Reg. IDOC Segement E1IDB02 in IDOC basic type PEXR2001

Hi All,
This probelm is with the idoc segment definition release.
The IDOC segement defintion E2IDB02002 is not in release status.
Could you please let me know how to change the segment Status to Release.
Regards
Anil Kumar K

Hi Anil,
You can set and reset the release status in transaction WE30 (if I remember it right). You can switch (when at the SAP Menu tree) to the IDoc Menu by transaction WEDI. You will see the relevant transactions under the menu point "development".
Gunter

Similar Messages

IDOC Segement Release vs IDOC Basic Type

Hi there,
we are in an upgrade project and are runing into a general question about idoc creation.
Here is our behavior:
1. We have an reduced IDOC Type in BD53 ZMATMAS based on Messagetype MATMASDI.
2. It has 2 Segements E1MARAM with fields MSGFN MATNR PSTAT and Subsegemnt E1MAKTM with fields MSGFN SPRAS MAKTX.
3. Done the things around (RFC, Partner Profile, distribution model, changepointer ..)
4. In Distribution Model in outbound parameters, added our ZMATMAS.
As parameters we have: Partner type: LS, Message Type: ZMATMAS, Basic Type MATMAS03! and Seg. release in IDOC Type 46B. The Partnersystem is an NoneSAP System.
We are using MATMAS03 because this interface exists since 46B.
Now we send an Material with BD10 and Message Type ZMATMAS.
The Master and Commuidoc are successfull created. In BD87 the commuidoc is an MATMAS03 and has the expected 2 segements E1MARAM and E1MAKTM.
But what we do not expect, if we look into the content of E1MARAM there are ALL Fields which exist for the E1MARAM in release 7.00. Not only our 3 fields MSGFN MATNR PSTAT, or as we second expect only the segemnts that had existed in the segemnt E1MARAM in release 46B of MATMAS03.
The additional fields were filled with the NODATA sign.
My question is: Is it correct that an IDOC with basic type MATMAS03 can have an segement E1MARAM which is formated like the segemntdefinition E2MARAM007 (Release 7.00 / 6.03)?
The difference is definatly the length of the field! 876 in 7.0 vs 757 in 4.6A.
Why is SAP using the highest available segemnt release regardles which basic type we choose?
Isnt this wrong?
Additional infos:
We know that it is not possible to have an IDOC with basic type MATMAS03 with an segement e.g. E1MARA1 which only exists in newer basic type MATMADI if segemnt release is set to 46B in our distribution model.
Failure is: Segment E1MARA1 is unknown in Release 46B/ (correct and expected behavior)
If we are using this scenario with not an reduced message type, we will only find the fields in E1MARAM which are filled with data. (Not all fields of the latest release with nodata)
I traced the MASTER_IDOC_CREATE_MATMAS and hit the function IDOC_REDUCTION_FIELD_REDUCE. As you can see in it, it first checks if the idoc is an reduced message type, and at the end, fills up all fields with the "empty_symbol" which have no data in it. Why is this only happening if it is an reduced message type?
Kind regards
Manuel

Additional Info:
In WE21 at the TRFC Port, it is possible to set this Option:
Send Only Fields of Selected Segment Version
The segment data of the IDoc is passed to this port with the length matching the segment definition of the release specified in the partner profile.
But if we are using an reduced message type, all fields of the newest release are in the segement.
The docu tells that this will be done in function EDI_DOCUMENT_OPEN_FOR_CREATE.
But it is never called when createing an material IDOC with BD10.
Bug or feature?
Kind regards
Manuel

Structure of basic type PEXR2001 - PEXR2002

Hello,
I am sorry for my english.
I search informations about the structure of PEXR2001 and PEXR2002.
I have found links for others types IDoc like CREMAS02 : https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002529571998/cremas02_d.htm
or MATMAS03 : https://websmp102.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002529571998/matmas03_d.htm
I want know if there are a link for see the structure of PEXR2001 and PEXR2002.
I have already test : https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002529571998/pexr2001_d.htm
but this don't work.
Thx,

Hi,
I up my post.
I have to make a mapping from PEXR2002 (PAYEXT) to SCT ( European format for credit transfer ).
I obtained a description of PEXR2002 with all segment that contain but without explications.
I search restrictions of this format (segment mandatory, field use or not), signification of segments and if it is possible to have a sample of PERX2002.
NB : I have not SAP software.
Thx,

Basic type show in WE05 not same as per defined

Hi All,
I have created a customised message type ZMATMAS1, using customised basic type ZMATMAS1 too.
already assigned in WE81 WE82 BD69 & activated in BD50
When idoc generated from BD21, I found that the idoc in WE05 shows the basic type is MATMAS05, why it doesn't follow ZMATMAS1 as I defined ?
Thanks in advanced

Hi Janice,
Sorry, just noticed that I initially read your posting wrong. You have defined a new basic IDoc type and not a new extension type. So my reference to the customer exit is not applicable, because the one I referenced cannot be used to change the basic IDoc type.
Have you taken a look at message type MATCOR with IDoc type MATCOR01 (basically MARA + MAKT)? This might be what you want if you just need some basic material data.
I can't use reduced type of MATMAS bcos some mandatory fields cannot be omitted.
I'm not aware of any mandatory fields. Within IDocs you have a concept of mandatory segments and you cannot remove mandatory segments via IDoc reduction. So for MATMAS05 you cannot remove E1MARAM and E1MAKTM, but other segments you can remove. Thus a reduced message type actually is an option.
Cheers, harald

Inbound IDOC basic type HRMD_A07: Why no validation available?

I am using a standard inbound IDOC basic type HRMD_A07 to update employee master data (IT0000 & IT0001). However, i found out that this IDOC just directly updates to the infotypes without any validation. For example, i provide an invalid company code (BUKRS) and personnel area (WERKS), the IDOC still updates into database without any proper validation.
Filled the following fields in the IDOC segments:
E1PLOGI
plvar=01, otype=P, objid=00000001, opera=I
E1PITYP
plvar=01, otype=P, objid=00000001, infty=0000, begda=20120101, endda=99991231
E1P0000
pernr=00000001, infty=0000, endda=99991231, begda=20120101, massn=01, massg=01, stat1=3, stat2=3
E1PITYP
plvar=01, otype=P, objid=00000001, infty=0001, begda=20120101, endda=99991231
E1P0001
pernr=00000001, infty=0001, endda=99991231, begda=20120101, bukrs=XXXX, werks=XXXX, persg=1, persk=EC, abkrs=99, plans=00000111, otype=S
Please help me out in case I am missing something. Thanks.

Additional Info:
In WE21 at the TRFC Port, it is possible to set this Option:
Send Only Fields of Selected Segment Version
The segment data of the IDoc is passed to this port with the length matching the segment definition of the release specified in the partner profile.
But if we are using an reduced message type, all fields of the newest release are in the segement.
The docu tells that this will be done in function EDI_DOCUMENT_OPEN_FOR_CREATE.
But it is never called when createing an material IDOC with BD10.
Bug or feature?
Kind regards
Manuel

IDOC communication between different basic type releases.

Has anyone run into a scenario where a newer SAP release would like to send a message to a partner with an older SAP release, using a basic type that does not exist in the older system? (eg. DELVRY05 which only exists in release 700)
In this scenario, what is the best practice, other than to have the newer SAP system send an older basic type that does exist in the receiving partner?
Thanks.

Hi,
You can do this by specifying the older release in the partner profile outbound settings (for message type).
Under the "Outbound options" tab there is a field "Seg. release in IDoc type". There you can specify the older release and the IDoc will automatically be depricated when it is received in the receiving system.
Regards,
Gajendra.

Enter a valid basic type - BW IDoc type RSSEND is not same as the SS IDOC

Hi,
I am connecting the ERP system to BW system, and am getting error:
CHECK(context menu source system):
@5C@     BW unknown in source system     RSAR     8
@5C@     The BW IDoc type RSSEND is not the same as the source system IDoc type     RSAR     371
RESTORE(context menu source system):
Information: Enter a valid basic type
Information help:
Enter a valid basic type
    Message no. E0434
Diagnosis
    An entry with the key /BD2CLNT100/LS//RSSEND//// is to be inserted in
    table
    EDP13.
    The value 'RSBEND' is not valid for field IDOCTYP.
Procedure
    Check whether basic type RSBEND exists.
help required

Hi,
Please find the below link may useful.
http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/Re-Connect_R/3_and_BW
Reg,
Venkat

How to change the default IDOC basic type from CREMAS05 to CREMAS04.

Hi All,
How to change the default IDOC basic type from CREMAS05 to CREMAS04 when sending Vendor Master Data.
When I generate partner profile, the system will add the latest version of IDOC type which is CREMAS05 to the Outbound message. In my project, I'm asked to use CREMAS04.
I want to use BD14 to send master data directly, but the program will generate IDOC using CREMAS05. Is there a way that I can change it to CREMAS04? And also for using Change Pointers, I want to use the report RBDMIDOC, but i have the same problem.
Thanks
Sai Krishna

execute WE20 and edit the outbound parameters
here is a pretty good example: http://documentation.softwareag.com/webmethods/sapr3_gateway/sap231/pages/sapdist.htm
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Sep 7, 2011 9:49 PM

Error in idoc of basic type artmas05 - status 51 with Message no. MG537

Hi all,
I tried to upload the material master table through idoc creation of basic type artmas05. But when i'm trying to do that i'm getting status 51 with Message no. MG537. then I analysed the application log which displays the following
*The field MARA-MEINS/BAPIE1MARART-BASE_UOM(_ISO) is defined as a required
field; it does not contain an entry
*The field MARA-TAKLV/BAPIE1MARART-TAX_CLASS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
*The field MARA-TRAGR/BAPIE1MARART-TRANS_GRP is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
*You have not fully maintained the tax classifications
*The field MAW1-WLADG/BAPIE1MAW1RT-LOADINGGRP is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
But i hv given values for all the above fields in their respective segments.So can any1 suggest me how to proceed further.
It would be helpful if someone could tel me the required fields in idoc to upload material master table through idoc.
Thanks in advance,
Revathi.

Hi,
Anybody please tell me the reason for the following error, despite giving all the field values mentioned there. The same error occurs even if I run the BAPI (which the ARTMAS iDoc uses) directly by passing values.
The field MARA-MEINS/BAPIE1MARART-BASE_UOM(_ISO) is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
The field MARA-TAKLV/BAPIE1MARART-TAX_CLASS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
The field MARA-TRAGR/BAPIE1MARART-TRANS_GRP is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
The field MAW1-WLADG/BAPIE1MAW1RT-LOADINGGRP is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
Regards,
Gowri.S

Fill IDOC segment, E1IDBW1. For PEXR2002 Basic Type

Hello Team.
We send the IDOC for the Basic Type PEXR2002, Message Type PAYEXT.
This IDOC doesn't fill the Segment E1IDBW1 (IDoc header - special instructions (INP) )
I'm review some notes(1164524) and said to fill this segment it's neccesarie config the IHC.
But doesn't have this functionality.
It's possible fill the segment E1IDBW1 in a user exit or any other enhacement at creation idoc moment?
My idea is used the FM
CALL FUNCTION 'GET_SEGMENT_POS_FOR_INSERT'
    EXPORTING
      I_BASIS_TYPE            = ch_edidc-idoctp
      I_EXT_TYPE              = ch_edidc-cimtyp
      I_SEGMENT_TYPE          = 'E1IDBW1'
    IMPORTING
      E_INDEX                 = li_tabix
    TABLES
      IT_EDIDD                = t_edidd
    EXCEPTIONS
      BASIS_TYPE_NOT_FOUND    = 1
      EXTENSION_NOT_FOUND     = 2
      EXTENSION_ERROR         = 3
      INVALID_IDOC_DEFINITION = 4
      IDOC_ERROR              = 5
      INVALID_SEGMENT_TYPE    = 6
      INVALID_START_INDEX     = 7
      NO_MORE_POSITION        = 8
      TOO_MANY_SEGMENTS       = 9
      OTHERS                  = 10.
To Fill 2 constants in this segment.
Do you have any other idea?
Thanks
Edited by: David Lezama Gonzalez on Sep 1, 2011 2:51 PM

Hi,
Basically the segment E1IDBW1 will always be filled via user exit.
If you work with the IHC (In-House-Cash) application you have to fill
the E1IDBW1 segment as described in note 626577.
If you don't work in an IHC environment the following conditions must
be fulfilled:
1. The payment program has to fill certain fields (e. g. REGUH-DTAWS,
REGUH-DTWS1 - REGUH-DTWS4).
2. If this is fulfilled the payment data (REGUH, REGUP tables) will
be filled. The instruction keys will be moved to IDOC segment
E1IDKU3.
3. In user exit EXIT_SAPLIEDP_002 you can take over the instruction
keys from segment E1IDKU3 into E1IDBW1.
You may also read note 496663, this note explains about user exit
EXIT_SAPLIEDP_002 to populate this field in the idoc.
Also, you can check the note:
580321 - RFFOEDI1: BTE process 00002441 (Change IDoc)
REgards,
Cristiano

In cross apps what is basic type,idoc type , message type

in cross apps what is basic type,idoc type , message type explain to me breflley how to work on realtime plz help me i am learning

ALE/ IDOC
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/dc/6b835943d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/ale_scenario_development_procedure.doc
http://edocs.bea.com/elink/adapter/r3/userhtm/ale.htm#1008419
http://www.netweaverguru.com/EDI/HTML/IDocBook.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapedi/index.htm
http://www.sappoint.com/abap/ale.pdf
http://www.sappoint.com/abap/ale2.pdf
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapedi/idoc_abap.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/0b/2a60bb507d11d18ee90000e8366fc2/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/78/217da751ce11d189570000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
http://www.allsaplinks.com/idoc_sample.html
http://www.sappoint.com/abap.html
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/dc/6b835943d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/ale_scenario_development_procedure.doc
http://edocs.bea.com/elink/adapter/r3/userhtm/ale.htm#1008419
http://www.netweaverguru.com/EDI/HTML/IDocBook.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapedi/index.htm
http://www.allsaplinks.com/idoc_sample.html
Check these step-by-step links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/ccab6730-0501-0010-ee84-de050a6cc287
https://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/8fd773b3-0301-0010-eabe-82149bcc292e
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/3c5d9ae3-0501-0010-0090-bdfb2d458985

Trigger workflow when IDOC Status 51 & with Basic Type "ORDERS003"

Hi Experts,
Can any one explaine how to create worlflow for "When Idoc status is 51 with the combination of Basic Type "ORDERS003" . If this condition will satisfy i need to send a mail using worklflow. For this one Bussiness type is BUS2102".
Can you explaine any one please i am new to Workflow.
Regards,
Sri

Hi,
Please refer to the below thread. Hope it helps.
Triggering workflow upon idoc fail
Regards,
Sridhar

EXTEND BASIC TYPE HRMD_A FOR TRANSFER IDOC DATA (HR MODULE)

Hi,
I'm trying to various infotype 2001,2002,2006 ecc to another SAP system via ALE and since they are not part of message type "HRMD_A" I have created the extension ZHRMD_A06. I've already created the new segments(we31) and put these segments (with names Z1P2001, Z1P2002 ecc ecc) into the extension(we30). And I've assigned the extension to the message and basic type (we82).
The new segment are processed correctly in the idoc creation via transaction PFAL, but via transaction BD21 i meet the abend message : B1 070 - Internal Error : program....command... for argument Z1P2001 (for example)
In other words, BD21 do not process the custom segment but the PFAL yes...how it is possible?
I've activate the change pointer in every customizing table intersting.
Many thanks in advance for any reply
Achille

unfortunately, the standard do not provide the infotypes for the HR-TM (Time Management), that
are between the structures i must send in the other system sap.
Ok, I have never delt with Time data in HRMD_A. Probably this is the case then
Ok,now i've checked the filter in BD64 and the tables BDCP2, CDHDR and CDPOS but it seems
all correct!!
By checking Filters I mean that confirm if you have added Time Infotypes there (just
making sure). If data is appearing in BDCP2 that means there is no problem in Change
pointer creation, Just ruling out possibility.
Try with an user exit it's a good idea, but why in the PFAL the idoc (with the custom segments)
is created without problems and in the BD21 no??? This is very strange
1) Well BD21 uses the Function module (TBDME for HRMD_A) which read change pointers and
create IDOCs. So now if you have extended Segment you have to add your population code
here somewhere.
2) PFAL is Push program, my assimption here is you have wriiten some piece of code to
populate Additinal segments data here? Otherwise IDOC will not be populated
automatically.
Let me know what you think.

Inbound IDOC:Not able to create OBJID while testing basic type HRMD_A07

Hi Friends,
I am trying to test creation of organization data (HRP1000) for inbound idoc via tcode WE19 using basic idoc type HRMD_A07.I am using inbound fm IDOC_INPUT_HRMD.After test data entry,The idoc status is showing as 53 but in the database table HRP1000 objid is blank.It is not creating objid.can any body suggest solution for this.In this case,i want to create objid internally by the system.
Thanks,
Rajesh Kumar
Edited by: rajeshvatsa2005 on Feb 17, 2011 9:03 AM

Hi Rajanidhi,
Thank you for following up!
Perhaps optomizing the choice of forum for the questions could also help somewhat, in addition to following up on them. For example [this one|Forgot username & password; would have enjoyed more knowledgable attention in the NW Admin or Security forum.
Hope that helps in future,
Julius

Idoc Message type & Basic type

Hi All,
Can any one tell me what is the <b>Message type & Basic type(idoc type)</b>
of <b>Goods received</b> for inbound & outbound
Thanks
Sunil

refer view V_TBDMS in Sm30 transaction
check message types -
ACC_GOODS_MOV_REVERSE
ACC_GOODS_MOVEMENT
DANGEROUSGOOD
GOODSMVT_SAPCREATE
MBGMCA
MBGMCR
WGSREQ
WMMBXY
WPUWBW

Reg. IDOC Segement E1IDB02 in IDOC basic type PEXR2001

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for