Reg Price block and Qty block in MM Invoice docs Tolerence Keys adjustment
Hi Friends,
Related to MM Invoice documents gets blocked with Price block and Qty block,based on this FI doc also gets blocked with Payment block indicator"R".As per Std SAP we can remove these blocks thru MRBR. Right now my users are asking not required to remove these blocks with MRBR Tcode.
So i checked the Tolerence Limits defined for the co code and Tolerence keys.
As per my understanding Tolerence Keys "PP-Price variance", "DQ-Exceed amount: quantity variance" need to adjust with upper llimits and Lower Limits.
here i can see Upper and Lower check limit Tolerance limit 5.00% for Tolerence Key "PP-Price variance"
Tolerence limit 0.01% for Tolerence key "DQ-Exceed amount: quantity :quantity variance
Instead of changing the Tolerence Limits can i select the DO NOT CHECK Radio button for the bothe Price and Qty block.
If i selected the DO NOT check button what will happen,how it works.
How i can maintain the Tolerence keys,is there any other Tolerence keys also need to maintain.
Please suggest me with your valuable inputs.
Brgds,
RK
Edited by: RK.SAP on Nov 17, 2010 7:02 AM
hi,
If you do not want to check the Invoice for tolerance keys like quantity variance and price varaince then tick on don't check .In this case system will not block any invoice and invoice will post Automatically without any error.
Please check other tolerance keys in SPRO: OMR6
One more blocking is defined in the vendor master also under payment transactions accounting screen.There you are defining the tolerance group for Invoice Verification.
Regards,
Amit
Similar Messages
-
Blocking and non-blocking workflows
How to specify a workflow to be blocking and non-blocking?
Regards,
MiguelWhen registering the custom workflow from Application Server Control (Enterprise Manager Web Site), you will see an option to specify whether the workflow is blocking:
Application Server Control > Content > Custom Workflows
Register Workflow
* Name
Description
* Launch Event
* Cancel Event
Blocking
Approvers Required -
Set Posting block and Purchasing block automatically upon vendor creation
Hi.
I have a requirement to automatically set the purchasing block and posting block to 'X' upon creation of vendor master. I have seen a user exit to do this but then I can't seem to find a way to set the SPERM field to 'X'.
Please help. THanks.Transaction FIBF start the event manager.
on menu: environment->info system (P/S) and then execute: it will be displayed all possible events.
between event 1410 and 1460, you will find all events about vendor.
click on documentation, it will tell you when the event is reached and what you can do.
After you have choose an event, you must create a function module, copying it from the sample function module of the event.
Once you have created your own funcion module, you should go to:
FIBF->SETTINGS->P/S MODULES.
This part of customization is not very clear to me, i've never done by myself. Anyway, here you associate at the businness event the function module you have created.
Sorry for not beeing exaustive, hope anyway could be help you.
Regards
Andrea -
Both blocking and non-blocking io
I'm wondering if this scenario is possible with the new nio classes:
I have a caching server. Clients connect to the server and occasionally send requests for objects. I'd like to use the nio non-blocking APIs to detect that there is a read pending on a socket. However, once I detect this, I'd like to go into a blocking loop to process the request. After this done, I'd like to go back into non-blocking mode and wait for another request.
It seems like this should be possible but the (woefully lacking) documentation isn't clear. Neither is the source code, apparently.
I've got a test case working but I was hoping someone could validate for me that this is support behavior. It's done by waiting for the isReadable() key then calling socket.keyFor(selector).cancel(); and then socket.configureBlocking(true); The reads are then done in blocking mode until the request is done and then the socket is registered with the selector again.
Thanks for any help on this.I have to ask why you would want to mix blocking and non-blocking I/O.
The only reason you would (IMHO) want to use non-blocking I/O is in a highly concurrent system, to increase the maximum load a system can handle.
The main reason you would want to use blocking I/O rather than non-blocking I/O would be to minimise the latency for a single request.
Unfortunately, the two don't seem to mix together very well... by switching a thread to blocking, you decrease the latency for a single request, but increase latency for the other requests due to reduced resources available. Similarly, by switching to blocking, you are requiring a dedicated thread for that request, so limiting the number of concurrent requests that can be serviced.
That is, it seems to me that using both blocking and non-blocking I/O introduces the weaknesses of both into the system, without gaining much of the benefits of either.
The above aside, the method you gave looks like it would work as you expect, depending on what you are doing with thread creation/delegation. Did your test case work as expected? -
Release Invoice Price Block and Quantity Block
Hi,
How can I release the Invoice Price and Quantity block at the same time? I need to create a Step in a work flow to release all blocks of a two-way match block invoice.
I've already tried to have a BDC for transaction MRBR but it is not working.
Can anyone help?Hi Simi,
This type of behaviour is documented in SAP note 394370:
"A document generated with MIRO was blocked for payment.You cancel the
payment block from the vendor line item in the FI follow-up
document.Transaction MRBR then displays the invoice document
nevertheless. Why?
The invoice document itself cannot be changed by changes to the
follow-up documents; this is not programmed.Transaction MRBR therefore
continues to display the document as blocked. If this document is
released from an MM point of view, the FI follow-up document remains
released.Thus the damage caused is restricted to unnecessary work by the
user.
SAP recommends that you only use the release transactions for releasing
invoices."
MRBR generates its list of blocked invoices from table RBKP_BLOCKED and is the
only transaction which deletes entries from this table thats why when your report
calls FB02 to remove the payent block MRBR will still show the invoice as blocked.
You could code in a pop up message in your report that prevents the user from
deleting the payment block and to advise using MRBR instead to delete the block.
Hope this helps,
Adam. -
Problem in Execute query on non-database block and database block together
Hi All,
In my form,i have
1. First block is Non-database block with one non-database item.
2. Second and third blocks are database blocks.
Now the problem is that i want to perform execute-query for all the blocks.
If the cursor is on the non-database item of 1st block and i clicks on the "Enter-query" then i am getting message " This function can not be performed here".
If i click on the item of the database block and then clicks on the "Enter-query" and then "execute-query" it's working fine.
But i don't want to do in this way.
My cursor will be on the First block only and then it should perform execute-query.
I am using this non-database item to copy value of this item to the item of the database block item.
I think i make you understand about my problem.
I am using forms 10g on Window xp.
Please help me.Hi!
Simply create a enter-query trigger on the non-database-block:
begin
go_block ( 'database_block' );
enter_query;
end;If your search criteria is in the non-database-item in the first block,
you actually do not need the enter_query build-in.
Just create a execute-query trigger on the first block like:
begin
go_block ( 'database_block' );
execute_query;
go_item ( :System.trigger_item );
end;And in a pre-query trigger on the database-block copy the
value of your seach item into the item you want to search for.
Regards -
Page up and page down to go to next block and previous block
hii all
I want to incorporate a functionality which when the user clicks the page up button the cursor should navigate to the previous block and if i press the page down button the cursor should navigate to the next block
are there any triggersto do this ??
plzz help
thanks
mandarhii
thanks for ur response
i have written the code told my james
i have two blokcs master and details
i press the page down key to navigate to the details block from the master block..
after writing the code and executng the form when i press page down key
the message appears that at last block but the cursor still remains in that block only how do i make the cursor to next block ??
plzz help
mandar -
Max-width Ignored on fo:block and fo:block-container
I am writing an XSLT template using XSL-FO and I have an fo:block for which I want to limit the width. I set the property max-width to "3in" on the block, and that did nothing. Then I put the block into an fo:block-container and set the max-width property of it to "3in", and this was also ignored.
Is this a bug in the rendering engine or am I doing something wrong?
The block is in an fo:static-content.
Thanks,
KurzI'm not exactly sure I get what you intention is, but here are a few things to consider maybe.
max width will not make the image expand, just keep it from being any wider than the max width.
images by default display as in line. To make a width property work reliably, you will need to set it to block:
div#secondaries ol.secondary li div.item-img img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
image width as set above will be affected by its containers. (If you meant to limit the width of the image rather than to resize it, the same thing should still be true of a max-width on the image, though cross-browser support will be unreliable.)
The relevant container for the case above is:
div#secondaries ol.secondary li {
font-size: 1.1em;
width: 30%;
margin-top: 0em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;
margin-left: 0em;
So do you really mean it to be 30% or did you mean 100%. -
Blocking an Invoice for Tolerence Key BR (Percenatge OPUn variance)
Hi Gurus,
I am testing a new scenario in Invoice Tolerence Limits. I need to create a scenario for Invoice getting blocked due to tolerence key "BR". I am able to block the invoices but i am not sure that it is getting blocked due to the tolerence key BR (Percenatge OPUn variance)
Could anybody can throw some light on how to find that it is getting blocked for BR or please tell me how to test this scenario.
Thanks in Advance.
with Regards,
SaakithyanBR: Percentage OPUn variance (IR before GR)
The system calculates the percentage variance between the following ratios:
1) quantity invoiced in order price quantity units / quantity invoiced in order units (invoice value/inv qty)
2) quantity ordered in order price quantity units /quantity ordered in order units. (or value/ord qty)
The system compares the variance with the upper and lower percentage tolerance limits.
check if the above condn is satisfied.
Regards,
Bala -
Co-relation between oracle blocks and OS blocks ??
how is the database data-block co-related withe the OS data-block ??
Akshay,<br>
<br>
Ca va, merci. ;-)<br>
In the doc above, we can read "Each operating system has a block size. Oracle requests data in multiples of Oracle data blocks, not operating system blocks.".<br>
<br>
Anyway, you can search into Oracle doc, and find DB_BLOCK_SIZE Initialization Parameter : If a database's block size is different from the operating system block size, make the database block size a multiple of the operating system's block size.<br>
<br>
Nicolas. -
Qty Blocking scenario related to GR Based Invoice Verification
Friends,
I'm facing issues related to automatic deletion of Qty blocking reason during LIV.
Scenario is like below:
GR1 Qty = 5
IR1 Qty = 7
This invoice is posted by system but blocked for payment due to Qty variance.
Expectation is that store person should GR for balance 2 qty.
However even when this additional GR is posted, it is appearing as separate line item in PO History also and is not linked to IR1 and qty block against that invoice remains as it is there and it can not be released in MRBR automatic release functionality.
However, it's working fine in case if there is No GR Based IN activated for PO Line item.
is it a standard thing that we can't implement Qty blocking scenario ( & obviously it's auto release after reqd GR ) for GR Based IV scene.Thanks PRIYA for prompt reply as usual.
You are right , system will expect additional GR for diff qty.
However issue is that even I post this additional GR for 2 qty , system is not relasing this blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
However, if i test same scenario for PO item NOT having GR based-IV tick...system automatically release such qty blocked invoice in MRBR once it find additional GR posted against same PO line item.
But i case of GR based IV, system is not linking this additional GR to pending qty blocked invoice.
just FYI, However invoice blcoking due to price variance is working fine ( iwth reqd PO Line item price change, system is able to release this price blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
I believe you might have qty blocking scenario for GR Based IV cases in your any of previous projects. if yes, pls advise me.
Thanks in advance. -
Sale order delivery and billing blocked
Hi sap sd gurus
I have a problem after creating a sale order , the one line item in sale order showing status of delivery blocked and billing blocked , now i am unable to post delivery and billing when i see in schedule line item order qty and confirmed qty .
Now i want to find why this is blocked and remedy for removing this block .
Could anyone suggest me in this issue asap
thanks in advance
KannaDear Kanna,
Go to XD02 at the toppage you will find Extras
In that Extra Topage you will find a field Blocking Data.
Check whether Order block and Delivery Block has been ticked.
If ticked is there remove the tick and try Delivery and Billing.
If you have any concerns revert back the same to me
With Regards,
Amjath -
SO created delivery and billing blocked
Hi sap sd gurus
I have a problem after creating a sale order , the one line item in sale order showing status of delivery blocked and billing blocked , now i am unable to post delivery and billing when i see in schedule line item order qty and confirmed qty is present.
Now i want to find why this is blocked and remedy for removing this block .
Could anyone suggest me in this issue asap
thanks in advance
KannaHi,
In shcedule lines VOV6 you have maintained delviery block that might be one of the reason to get item blocked for delviery...
And also some body might set delivery and billing block manually at item level so please also look at change log of that document...
Please go to VA02 and there at schedule lines data of item level there u just reomove the deliver block manually and then save the order and also at item level in billing tabage please remove billing block manually...
Then try to create delveiry and billing...
Regards
sankar
Edited by: sankar sankar on Jul 9, 2008 3:00 PM
Edited by: sankar sankar on Jul 9, 2008 3:03 PM -
Standard SAP Report - Payments blocked and released
Hi Experts,
We are having a requirement where the payment will be blocked for the invoices generated through Invoicing Plan.
But we need a report " To know the status of payments blocked and released according to the invoicing plan". Do we have any standard SAP report on this requirement?
By
PrabhuHi,
Use t.code: FBL1N , enter company code & select document type "KZ" in dynamic selection
and then select & execute for....
1.Open Items in status segment for not paid to vendor
2.Cleared Items in status segment for paid to vendor
Regards,
Biju K -
Delivery and Billing block error message instead of warning in VA-01
Hi
We have defined certain block codes for customer in delivery block and billing block, when i block the customer using these codes and use that customer in creating sales order VA01 i get warning message instead of error.
We donot use credit managment, Is it possible to convert warning mesg to error by configuration?
For overall block i get error mesg.
Thanks,
VaishnaviDear Friend,
One way you set that message as a error message that control is there
Sales and Distribution > Sales > Sales Documents > Define Variable Messages
above path find the message and put the status as error message it will work fine
Regards
Hanumant
Maybe you are looking for
-
Does ipod work on i3 2nd generation processors, Does ipod work on i3 2nd generation processors
iPod classic works/connects to the Intel Core2Duo with Windows XP. But it does not connect to Intel i3 2nd generation Processor with OS Windows XP+SP3.
-
Mail comes in, but won't hardly go out. 450 host down
09:16:13 2A9 Queuing deferred message: GMAIL_S/SYS:\GDOMAIN\WPGATE\GWIA\send\sf0272f3.391 09:16:13 2A9 MSG 2249149 Analyzing result file: GMAIL_S/SYS:\GDOMAIN\WPGATE\GWIA\result\rf026b6b.349 09:16:13 2A9 MSG 2249149 Detected error on SMTP command 09:
-
Safari failing to load screenshots properly
I have recently been seeing that Safari 5.0.1 is failing to load screenshots properly. Instead the image starts to load but once complete it automatically starts to reload time after time, almost as though it is redirecting to the same page. I have s
-
How to reset ical after bad sync input
How to set up ical sync with 3rd party software, e.g., fastmail calendar.
-
Flex Builder 3.0.2 on Windows Vista 64bits
Hello, I've installed Flex Builder 3.2 on Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bits, everything seems to work fine except for a detail. When I go into a project's property panel, specifically: Flex Build Path or Flex Modules, in the first window it should d