Reg : Read statement using Binary Search....

I have an Internal Table as below
Value           Description
100               Product
2008             Production Year
05                 Production Month
I am using Read statement with Binary Search for getting Production Month.
Read table itab with key Description = 'Production Month' binary search.
I am getting sy-subrc as 4 eventhough data is present in the table for Production Month.
What may be the problem.

Hi suganya,
use
sort table itab ascending by <production month>.    
Read table itab with key description = <production month> binary search.
Remember always, while using binary search always sort the internal table.
Regards,
Sakthi.

Similar Messages

  • READ statement with binary search

    Hi friends,
    I know that while using the READ statement that we have to sort data and use BINARY SEARCH  for faster search.
    I have a situation
    following are internal table contents
    belnr          agent    action
    9000001   name1    BRW
    9000001   name1    API
    when i use READ statement with where condition (  ( belnr - 9000001 ) and  ( action = 'BRW' ) )  with binary search then the SY_SUBRC value is 4.
    if i remove the binary search then its giving SY-SUBRC value 0.
    Can anybody explain why BINARY SEARCH fails.
    Points will be rewarded for correct answers.
    Thanks and regards,
    Murthy

    try this i am not getting sy-subrc 4
    TYPES:BEGIN OF TY_ITAB,
    BELNR TYPE BELNR,
    AGENT(30),
    ACTION(5),
    END OF TY_ITAB.
    DATA:IT_TAB TYPE TABLE OF TY_ITAB,
         WA_TAB TYPE TY_ITAB.
    WA_TAB-BELNR = 9000001.
    WA_TAB-AGENT = 'name1'.
    WA_TAB-ACTION = 'BRW'.
    APPEND WA_TAB TO IT_TAB.
    CLEAR WA_TAB.
    WA_TAB-BELNR = 9000002.
    WA_TAB-AGENT = 'name 2'.
    WA_TAB-ACTION = 'API'.
    APPEND WA_TAB TO IT_TAB.
    loop at it_tab into wa_tab.
    read table it_tab into wa_tab with key belnr = wa_tab-belnr  binary search .
    write: sy-subrc, wa_tab-agent.
    endloop.

  • READ using Binary Search

    Hi,
    Is it necessary to use all the sorted keys in READ using BINARY SEARCH .
    For EX: Sort it_tab BY key1 key2
    While Reading i will use only key1 with BINARY SEARCH,Please tell me whether READ statement works?
    Thanks,
    Rathish

    Hello Ratish,
    There isnt any hard and fast rule that you will have to use all the fields on which you sort. The key fields which you may want to use in the READ statement depends on the logic with which you are reading the internal table. As Rob pointed out its better to use all the fields which could make a record unique in the READ statement else it would keep reading only the first occurence of the record.
    Vikranth

  • A little urgent when to use binary search.

    Hi evryone,
    Plz let me know under what kind of conditions can we use binary search addition cause if I use it for every read statement the database acees in se30 goes higher than normal.
    If i randomly select only a few big read table statements the database acees in se30 goes is slightly lesser.
    But I some how dont know where to use binary search and where not to with read statements.
    Expecting an early reply.
    Rgds,
    Anu

    hi,
    If you read entries from standard tables using a key other than the default key, you can use a binary search instead of the normal linear search. To do this, include the addition BINARY SEARCH in the corresponding READ statements.
    READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY <k1> = <f1>... <kn> = <fn> <result>
                                                           BINARY SEARCH.
    The standard table must be sorted in ascending order by the specified search key. The BINARY SEARCH addition means that you can access an entry in a standard table by its key as quickly as you would be able to in a sorted table.
    REPORT demo_int_tables_read_index_bin.
    DATA: BEGIN OF line,
            col1 TYPE i,
            col2 TYPE i,
          END OF line.
    DATA itab LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF line.
    DO 4 TIMES.
      line-col1 = sy-index.
      line-col2 = sy-index ** 2.
      APPEND line TO itab.
    ENDDO.
    SORT itab BY col2.
    READ TABLE itab WITH KEY col2 = 16 INTO line BINARY SEARCH.
    WRITE: 'SY-SUBRC =', sy-subrc.
    The output is:
    SY-SUBRC =    0
    The program fills a standard table with a list of square numbers and sorts them into ascending order by field COL2. The READ statement uses a binary search to look for and find the line in the table where COL2 has the
    reward if useful.
    Thanks,
    Madhukar

  • When to use binary search ... little urgent.

    Hi evryone,
    Plz let me know under what kind of conditions can we use binary search addition cause if I use it for every read statement the database acees in se30 goes higher than normal.
    If i randomly select only a few big read table statements the database acees in se30 goes is slightly lesser.
    But I some how dont know where to use binary search and where not to with read statements.
    Expecting an early reply.
    Rgds,
    Anu

    Hi,
    If  you read entries from standard tables using a key other than the default key, you can use a binary search instead of the normal linear search. To do this, include the addition BINARY SEARCH in the corresponding READ statements.
    READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY <k1> = <f1>... <kn> = <fn> BINARY SEARCH.
    The standard table must be sorted in ascending order by the specified search key. The BINARY SEARCH addition means that you can access an entry in a standard table by its key as quickly as you would be able to in a sorted table.
    BINARY SEARCH approaches the middle entry in the table, decides if it matches, or lexically greater than or equal to the key being searched. It accordingly skips either the top or bottom part of the internal table and searches the other half. It repeats this process till it finds the row.
    Using BINARY SEARCH with READ is the most efficient way to read standard internal tables which are sorted by the key used to search them
    BINARY SEARCH addition when reading a sorted table is not required, as it happens by default. It makes a good difference in performance if you are reading a large standard internal table without sorting and reading by BINARY SEARCH.
    Regards,
    Padmam.

  • Can't we use Binary SEARCH  for TYPE SORTED TABLE?(Performance Improvement)

    Hi Expert!
                       I have declare a sorted type table with NON -UNIQUE, and want to use Binary search in read statement. But while  using bunary search in read statement I'm facing an error. The ERROR is
    "Table LI_MARC is a SORTED TABLE or INDEX TABLE. The BINARY SEARCH
    addition is only allowed for these tables if the key specified is an
    initial part of the table key."
    Please find detail
    TYES: tt_marc  TYPE SORTED TABLE OF marc   WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY matnr,werks.
    DATA: li_marc type tt_marc.
    READ TABLE li_marc INTO marc WITH KEY matnr = i_mbew-matnr     
                                                                          werks = i_mbew-bwkey BINARY SEARCH . 
    To my understanding , there is no need to mention Bianry Search  for sorted table TYPE. Please  let me know can  i use ?

    Hello,
    there is no need to mention Bianry Search for sorted table TYPE.
    Yes, this is because for SORTED TABLEs binary search algorithm is used by default for READ TABLE. Although you can use BINARY SEARCH addition but it's use is redundant.
    As for your case you've defined the KEY fields incorrectly There shouldn't be any "comma(s)" between the fields.
    TYPES: tt_marc TYPE SORTED TABLE OF marc WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY matnr werks.
    When you define it with commas
    TYPES: tt_marc TYPE SORTED TABLE OF marc WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY matnr, werks.
    the result is something like this:
    TYPES: tt_marc TYPE SORTED TABLE OF marc WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY matnr.
    TYPES: werks.
    Hence you were getting the syntax error!
    BR,
    Suhas
    PS: As for MARC you can use UNIQUE KEY addition because MATNR & WERKS are the key fields in the table.

  • Read table and binary search

    Hi all,
    I have a simple query regarding read int_tab with binary search.
    Why reading  internal table with binary search fails if it is sorted in descending order table must be sorted in ascending order?
    I check fo the algorithm of binary search, it does not talk about sort order. As far as my understanding goes binary search only require sorted table but while reading table in SAP it has to be sorted in ascending order!!

    By default binary search assumes that the sort order is ASCENDING.
    If you sort the list in descending and then try to binary search your quires will fail. Look at an example:
    Let the descending order internal table as:
    Field1      Field2
    Sam        50000
    John       34786
    Boob      54321
    Alice       12345
    When you do binary search with key = 'Sam' then it will directly go to 2nd and 3rd records for comparision. The binary search algorithm compares 'Sam' with 'John' and it concludes that 'Sam' is greater than 'John' and it will continue to look downward into the internal table. And when it reaches the end of the internal table then the value of SY-TABIX = 5 and SY-SUBRC = 8 (Key is greater than the all).
    And if you do binary search with key = 'Alice' then the binary search algorithm compares 'Alice' with 'John' and it concludes that 'Alice' is lower than 'John' and it will continue to look upward into the internal table. And when it reaches above the first record in internal table then the value of SY-TABIX = 1 and SY-SUBRC = 4 (points to the next largest entry).
    The only correct result you will get is when you execute statement with key='John' (In this particular case) . SY-TABIX = 2 and SY-SUBRC = 0. I think you got this binary search algorithm.

  • Please explain how to use binary search in this loop.

    Hi,
    I want to use the binary search in below Read please give me solution....
    LOOP AT it_vbfa_temp ASSIGNING <fs_vbfa_temp>.
          CLEAR is_ekbz1.
          READ TABLE it_ekbz1 INTO is_ekbz1 WITH KEY xblnr = <fs_vbfa_temp>-deliv flag = space.
          IF  sy-subrc = 0.
            w_tabix = sy-tabix.
            is_ekbz1-tknum = <fs_vbfa_temp>-shipno.
            is_ekbz1-flag  = 'X'.
            MODIFY it_ekbz1 FROM is_ekbz1 INDEX w_tabix TRANSPORTING tknum flag.
    ENDLOOP.

    Hi,
    Thanks for the inputs given.. Please find the solution for the same ....
       CLEAR is_ekbz1.
        is_ekbz1-flag = 'X'.
        MODIFY it_ekbz1 FROM is_ekbz1 TRANSPORTING flag WHERE flag IS INITIAL.
        SORT it_ekbz1 BY ebeln xblnr lifnr flag.
      LOOP AT it_vbfa_temp ASSIGNING <fs_vbfa_temp>.
          CLEAR is_ekbz1.
          READ TABLE it_ekbz1 INTO is_ekbz1 WITH KEY xblnr = <fs_vbfa_temp>-deliv flag = 'X' BINARY SEARCH.
          IF  sy-subrc = 0.
            w_tabix = sy-tabix.
            is_ekbz1-tknum = <fs_vbfa_temp>-shipno.
            is_ekbz1-flag  = space.
            MODIFY it_ekbz1 FROM is_ekbz1 INDEX w_tabix TRANSPORTING tknum flag.
      ENDLOOP.
    Regards,
    Srinivas
    Edited by: Srininas on Apr 6, 2010 12:16 PM
    Edited by: Srininas on Apr 6, 2010 12:17 PM

  • READ...BINARY SEARCH for more than 1 row.

    Hi,
    i have an internal table that contains several same entries. now i want to search the table with READ ... BINARY SEARCH ( or in another efficient way ) and get all those entries and not just one/the first one.
    how could i do that ? thanks in advance!

    hi leider,
    plz c the below sample code.
    loop at i_head into workarea.
    READ TABLE i_zvfx_gts008_itm INTO wa_zvfx_gts008_itm
                                     WITH KEY
                                     bukrs     = wa_zvfx_gts008_head-bukrs
                                  zzinvoice = wa_zvfx_gts008_head-zzinvoice
                                     BINARY SEARCH.
        IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
          LOOP AT i_zvfx_gts008_itm INTO wa_zvfx_gts008_itm FROM sy-tabix.
            IF ( wa_zvfx_gts008_itm-bukrs NE wa_zvfx_gts008_head-bukrs ) OR
          ( wa_zvfx_gts008_itm-zzinvoice NE wa_zvfx_gts008_head-zzinvoice ).
              EXIT.
            ENDIF.
    endloop.
    this is something like avoiding loop at where condition.
    plz reward points if found helpful.

  • Binary search option with Read statement

    Hi,
    There are any chances that the Read statement with Binary search option to fail, even though the key exists??
    Here the itab is sorted in descending order. and then some duplicates are removed using the delete adjacent statement.
    Regards,
    Sandhip.

    Hi,
    Here is an example:
    sort itab1 by a b c.
    loop at itab2 into wa_itab2.
      read table itab1 into wa_itab1
                       with key a = wa_itab2-a
                                b = wa_itab2-b
                       c = wa_itab2-c
                           binary search.
      if sy-subrc = 0.
        wa_output-a = wa_itab1-a.
      endif.
    endloop.
    Another alternative is to use sorted tables.
    Hope it helps...
    P.S. Please award points if it helps...

  • Problem with READ Statement in the field routine of the Transformation

    Hi,
    I have problem with read statement with binary search in the field routine of the transformation.
    read statement is working well when i was checked in the debugging mode, it's not working properly for the bulk load in the background. below are the steps i have implemented in my requirement.
    1. I selected the record from the lookuo DSO into one internal table for all entried in source_packeage.
    2.i have read same internal table in the field routine for each source_package entry and i am setting the flag for that field .
    Code in the start routine
    select source accno end_dt acctp from zcam_o11
    into table it_zcam
    for all entries in source_package
    where source = source_package-source
         and accno = source_package-accno.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    delete it_zcam where acctp <> 3.
    delete it_zcam where end_dt initial.
    sort it_zcam by surce accno.
    endif.
    field routine code:
    read table it_zcam with key source = source_package-source
                                                 accno  = source_package-accno
                                                 binary search
                                                 transportin no fields.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    RESULT  = 'Y'.
    else.
    RESULT = 'N'.
    endif.
    this piece of code exist in the other model there its working fine.when comes to my code it's not working properly, but when i debug the transformation it's working fine for those accno.
    the problem is when i do full load the code is not working properly and populating the wrong value in the RESULT field.
    this field i am using in the report filter.
    please let me know if anybody has the soluton or reason for this strage behaviour.
    thanks,
    Rahim.

    i suppose the below is not the actual code. active table of dso would be /bic/azcam_o1100...
    1. is the key of zcam_o11 source and accno ?
    2. you need to get the sortout of if endif (see code below)
    select source accno end_dt acctp from zcam_o11
    into table it_zcam
    for all entries in source_package
    where source = source_package-source
    and accno = source_package-accno.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    delete it_zcam where acctp 3.
    delete it_zcam where end_dt initial.
    endif.
    sort it_zcam by surce accno.
    field routine code:
    read table it_zcam with key source = source_package-source
    accno = source_package-accno
    binary search
    transportin no fields.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    RESULT = 'Y'.
    else.
    RESULT = 'N'.
    endif.

  • Binary Search in Dynamic Read

    Here is the code
          read table <fs_it_crv> assigning <fs_wa_crv> with key
                                      ('objty') = wa_plfh-objty
                                      ('objid') = wa_plfh-objid
                                      binary search.
    If i use binary search system giving error while activating as
    You cannot use explicit or implicit index operations on tables with
    types "HASHED TABLE" or "ANY TABLE". "" has the type "ANY
    TABLE". It is possible that .
    How could i use Binary search in dynamic read

    Hello,
    how do you create your internal table "<FS_IT_CRV>" ?
    i found this thread [here|Need help regarding Dynamic Read Table statement;.
    You can try the code lines of  David Klotz.
    If you insert a sort statement before read and change read adding binary search it might work.
    SORT <gt_itab> BY (ge_key_field1) (ge_key_field2) (ge_key_field3) .
    * Finally, perform the search
      READ TABLE <gt_itab> ASSIGNING <gs_result>
              WITH KEY (ge_key_field1) = pa_cond1
                       (ge_key_field2) = pa_cond2
                       (ge_key_field3) = pa_cond3 BINARY SEARCH.
    I tried the following code in my own program and it works:
    SORT <wlf_t_data> BY (c_trkorr).
      read table <wlf_t_data> assigning <wlf_header> with key
             (c_trkorr) = 'DRR' binary search.
    Where   <wlf_t_data> is a dynamic table created by method create_dynamic_table of class cl_alv_table_create.
    Cordialement,
    Chaouki

  • Usage of binary key in the read statement

    Hi Experts,
       For usage of binary search in the read statement, what is the minimum number of records (availablity) should be available in the internal table itab as per the below Example..
    SYNTAX: Read table itab with key X binary search.
    For eg: we have to use 16 primary keys only while creating a table.
    Regards,
    Maha

    Hi Pushpraj,
    I am sorry to say this. I am not at all speaking about the number of keys  in the read statement.
    I am talking abt "number of records to be there in the internal table to use binary search"
    Generally, we use binary search when there is more data in the internal table. Can u specify what is the minimum records available in the internal table for using the binary search???
    For Eg: Read table itab with key X binary search.
    Iam talking abt the number of records in the internal table ITAB available if we want to use BINARY SEARCH(keyword).

  • Weird situation with BINARY SEARCH in READ statwment??

    Hi Experts,
    I got weird situation with BINARY SEARCH !! bcoz, below is my code,
    data: begin of it_vbap occurs o,
            vbeln like vbap-vbap,
            posnr like vbap-posnr, ( i also tried like, posnr(6) type n)
    end of it_vbap.
    data: counter type i ( i also tried like, counter(6) type n)
    my it_vbap is filled like below,
    vbeln----
    posnr
    12345678-------000001
    12345678-------000002
    12345678-------000003
    12345678-------000004
    12345678-------000005
    12345678-------000006
    sort it_vbap by posnr. (*)
    clear counter
    loop it_vbap.
    counter = counter + 1.
    read table it_vbap with key posnr = counter
    binary search (after commenting the above SORT * marked statement, then,if I delete BINARY SEARCH, then its working!!)
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    here is my logic.
    endif.
    endloop.
    so, now, for
    1st loop the sy-subrc = 0.
    2nd loop the sy-subrc = 0.
    3rdloop the sy-subrc NE  0.
    4th loop the sy-subrc = 0.
    5th loop the sy-subrc NE 0.
    6th loop the sy-subrc NE 0.
    so, why, ebven though there r all entires in it_vbap, why am getting the sy-subrc NE 0??
    Is the reason that, there r less number of entries in it_vbap?? and am using BINARY SEARCH??
    thanq
    Edited by: SAP ABAPer on Dec 4, 2008 8:33 PM
    Edited by: SAP ABAPer on Dec 4, 2008 8:37 PM
    Edited by: SAP ABAPer on Dec 4, 2008 8:37 PM

    Hello
    The following coding works perfect (6x sy-subrc = 0) on ERP 6.0:
    *& Report  ZUS_SDN_ITAB_BINARY_SEARCH
    REPORT  zus_sdn_itab_binary_search.
    TABLES: vbap.
    DATA: BEGIN OF it_vbap OCCURS 0,
    vbeln LIKE vbap-vbeln,
    posnr LIKE vbap-posnr, "( i also tried like, posnr(6) type n)
    END OF it_vbap.
    DATA: counter TYPE posnr.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
      " Fill itab with data:
    *  12345678-------000001
    *  12345678-------000002
    *  12345678-------000003
    *  12345678-------000004
    *  12345678-------000005
    *  12345678-------000006
      REFRESH: it_vbap.
      CLEAR: vbap.
      DO 6 TIMES.
        it_vbap-vbeln = '12345678'.
        it_vbap-posnr = syst-index.
        APPEND it_vbap.
      ENDDO.
      SORT it_vbap[] BY posnr.  " for BINARY SEARCH
      BREAK-POINT.
      clear counter.
      loop at it_vbap.
      counter = counter + 1.
      READ TABLE it_vbap WITH KEY posnr = counter
      BINARY SEARCH.  " (after commenting the above sort * marked statement, then,if i delete binary search, then its working!!)
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        "here is my logic.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    END-OF-SELECTION.
    By the way, if your requirement is to check whether the first item has POSNR = '000001', the second item has POSNR = '000002' and so on then you can simplify your coding like this:
    counter = 0.
    LOOP AT it_vbap.
      counter = syst-tabix.
      IF ( it_vbap-posnr = counter ).
        " put in here your logic
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • "Binary search" in READ

    Hi frnds,
      I sumtyms  dont get the desired result while using the
    "BINARY SEARCH" addition with the "READ" statement.
    y is that? is there any rules to be followed to use binary search option in read statement.
    Regards,
    Madan...

    Hi
    Please go thru this.
    Binary Search in Standard Tables
    If you read entries from standard tables using a key other than the default key, you
    can use a binary search instead of the normal linear search. To do this, include the addition
    BINARY SEARCH in the corresponding READ statements.
    READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY = <f> <result> BINARY SEARCH.
    and
    READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY <k1> = <f1> ... <kn> = <fn> <result>
    BINARY SEARCH.
    The standard table must be sorted in ascending order by the specified search key. The BINARY
    SEARCH addition means that you can access an entry in a standard table by its key as quickly
    as you would be able to in a sorted table.
    Example
    DATA: BEGIN OF LINE,
    COL1 TYPE I,
    COL2 TYPE I,
    END OF LINE.
    DATA ITAB LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF LINE.
    DO 4 TIMES.
    LINE-COL1 = SY-INDEX.
    LINE-COL2 = SY-INDEX ** 2.
    APPEND LINE TO ITAB.
    ENDDO.
    SORT ITAB BY COL2.
    READ TABLE ITAB WITH KEY COL2 = 16 INTO LINE BINARY SEARCH.
    WRITE: 'SY-SUBRC =', SY-SUBRC.
    The output is:
    SY-SUBRC = 0
    The program fills a standard table with a list of square numbers and sorts them into
    ascending order by field COL2. The READ statement uses a binary search to look
    for and find the line in the table where COL2 has the value 16.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/fc/eb35f8358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
    Thanks
    Shiva

Maybe you are looking for