Reg: RFC / IDOC required for doing CIDX Scenario

Hi! Gurus,
This is Amar Srinivas Eli. I have task here to work and implement CIDX Scenario succesfully. There are some business cases as per the CIDX standards from that I was selected one Business case i,,e, FORECASTING.
But inorder to implement that scenario I need some RFC's or IDOC lists from SAP side whether it may be a source or target side..what ever it may be...and other side will be CIDX format.
Here I need your help in the below mentioned tasks. Kindly help me out in a detailed step by step guide and do the needful to me.
1. How to get RFC / IDOC name from R3 System and I know that I can get RFC from SE37 and IDOCs
from WE05 but I need whether all the required fileds are statisfying in the RFC's or not.
2. My first preference is only for STANDARD SAP RFCs or IDOCs.
3. Please let me know how to see the inner fields present in those RFC's
4. ALso please provide any configuration guide which contains screen shots if you already worked
earlier on CIDX Scenario I mean step by step and also for testing
5... tell me if there is any other tool other than STK kit for testing CIDX messages.
6. Is there any Freeware STK tool kit is there or not...
Also share your experience and errors that you have faces while doing this CIDX Scenario.
Regards:
Amar Srinivas Eli

Hi! All,
Thanks for your fast response..
Hi! Raja,
I gone through your points. Here I have few doubts on those please clarify that.
1. Coming to testing i didt used any testing tool , but you can comre your output using XML Spy or Stylus studio.*
*CIDx Documents,you wil find in SDN please search in SDN.
Means Without using STK Tool or else some other tool How can I get the CIDX response for my request in the Testing environment. See I am not doing this in real time I am trying to findout the solution for Business cases so I need one testing environment tool right ? Is that ALTOVA XML spy will give no right ?
Note: You told that you have done that business case IDOC--CIDX Order change / req Will you please share the information documentation I mean step by step procedure for end to end doc...based on your scenario ?
2. I know those R3 and PI settings I mean configurations means ports and RFC destinations and all those..but only thing I dono is "How you got that IDOC I mean on what basis and how did u search the IDOC?"
3. See Here I am working on topic FORECASTING it includes so many sub tasks like Deman PLan req and response, supply plan req and response and replenishment order and etc....so based on that how can I get those related RFC's or IDOC's in order to communicate from R3 Side
If Suppose I have seen one RFC/IDOC and for example out of 10 fields few are there in one IDOC and another few are there in another IDOC then in that case I need to go for Multimapping IDOCs I mean 2 Senders to one Receiver if yes Is it possible?
My first requirement is based on the above mentioned business cases how can I get the corresponding RFC's or IDOCs ?
Regards:
Amar Srinivas Eli
Edited by: Amar Srinivas Eli on Jan 5, 2009 12:19 PM

Similar Messages

Business requirement for soap2rfc & file2idoc scenarios

1)Please give me the bsuiness requirement for soap-rfc & file2idoc scenarios
2)I also need the rfc and idoc used for that requirement

HI
Soap-RFC
SOAP to RFC sync scenario
File- IDOC
File to IDOC
File-IDoc Scenario
While doing an File -> XI -> IDoc scenario, The Points to noted are:
1. You dont need a DT, MT or a message interface for the IDOC as it itself acts as the Message Interface.
2. You import the IDOC and use the same in your mapping.
3. In this configuration note that you will need a sender agreement for the file.
4. In this configuration note that you will also need a receiver agreement for the IDOC.
For any File -> XI -> IDoc scenario ref:
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping
Also check these...
Configuring the sender File adapter --
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Configuring the reciever IDOC adapter --
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/96/791c42375d5033e10000000a155106/frameset.htm

Reg ALE-IDOC------- rush for points :)

Hi all,
I m trying ALE from client 800 to 810 of IDES. I completed the outbound process and i m seeing the IDOC with status 03 in WE02 with green signal.
Now wht i need to do to see my iDOC....help me futher.
Regards,
[email protected]

Hi
See the tarnsaction WE05
or in the tables EDIDS,EDIDC and EDID4
see the other related tcodes of the IDOC's
Important Transaction Codes:
SALE - IMG ALE Configuration root
WE20 - Manually maintain partner profiles
BD64 - Maintain customer distribution model
BD71 - Distribute customer distribution model
SM59 - Create RFC Destinations
BDM5 - Consistency check (Transaction scenarios)
BD82 - Generate Partner Profiles
BD61 - Activate Change Pointers - Globally
BD50 - Activate Change Pointer for Msg Type
BD52 - Activate change pointer per change.doc object
BD59 - Allocation object type -> IDOC type
BD56 - Maintain IDOC Segment Filters
BD53 - Reduction of Message Types
BD21 - Select Change Pointer
BD87 - Status Monitor for ALE Messages
BDM5 - Consistency check (Transaction scenarios)
BD62 - Define rules
BD79 - Maintain rules
BD55 - Defining settings for IDoc conversion
WEDI - ALE IDoc Administration
WE21 - Ports in Idoc processing
WE60 - IDoc documentation
SARA - IDoc archiving (Object type IDOC)
WE47 - IDoc status maintenance
WE07 - IDoc statistics
BALE - ALE Distribution Administration
WE05 - IDoc overview
BD87 - Inbound IDoc reprocessing
BD88 - Outbound IDoc reprocessing
BDM2 - IDoc Trace
BDM7 - IDoc Audit Analysis
BD21 - Create IDocs from change pointers
SM58 - Schedule RFC Failures
Basic config for Distributed data:
BD64: Maintain a Distributed Model
BD82: Generate Partner Profile
BD64: Distribute the distribution Model
<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
Regards
Anji

Sugestion required for Fiscal Year scenario

Hi Gurus,
I need your suggestion for the below scenario
One of our client going to change the Fiscal period from (Jan - dec ) to (Sep - Oct). We have nearly 5 years of records as on date based on the (Jan-Dec) fiscal period.
Requirement: If new fiscal peirod will come in active , they want to view all the data ( Including historical records)based on the both the fiscal period based on the selection in the query.
Technical requirement: Dynamic switching is requried for Fiscal Year Variant in the query level.
Suggestion Required for below point:
1. Is it required to maintain two Fiscal year variant ?
2.How do we maintain the new fiscal year period for historical record ?
3. Is it any posibilities their with out major disturbance of the existing query ?
4. Is it possible to do in query level with minor impact of performance ?
5. Is it possible to do in back end side with out redundancy of the records ?
6.I have a solution to use multiprovider on top of two infoprovides which are maintain the fiscal period based on two fiscal year variant. If I realize this it would lead major back end work.
7. I have another solution to add another two fields in the existing structure to hold new variant and fiscal period. If I do this How dynamically I can change the structure of the query for to view the different fiscal period information.
Anticipate your reply eagerly
With Regards
Siva

Hi,
1. Is it required to maintain two Fiscal year variant ?
Yes, You will need to have another Fiscal Year variant for Sep to Oct.
2.How do we maintain the new fiscal year period for historical record ?
To do this at the BI Level, You can have a routine to convert the Fiscal Year Period according to the new Variant.
You will have to get the help of a functional consultant in order to understand the logic of opening and closing balance. According to the new variant the current Fisc Period 009.2009(Sep 2009) will become 001.2010 and so on. Apart form just converting the period, you will also have to take care of carrying over the balances.
3. Is it any posibilities their with out major disturbance of the existing query ?
Once you implement the above logic, you can just include the New Fiscal variant into the query.
4. Is it possible to do in query level with minor impact of performance ?
Yes, as mentioned above.
5. Is it possible to do in back end side with out redundancy of the records ?
Not sure about this.
6.I have a solution to use multiprovider on top of two infoprovides which are maintain the fiscal period based on two fiscal year variant. If I realize this it would lead major back end work.
This seems to be the best way. You will not have to touch the existing cube. Only your reports will have to be copied to the New MultiCube. The logic in the 2nd Q above will be for the new cube.
Regards,
Gaurav

Is SAP-OSS RFC Configuration required for Technical Monitoring ?

Hi Experts,
I have not configured the SAP-OSS rfc connection.Is it required for setting up the technical monitoring(Tcode : SOLMAN_SETUP).
If Yes can you please help me in solving the above problem.Our aim is to configure technical monitoring for system and self-monitoring.
Thanks In Advance,
Satheesh E

Hello,
I am assuming you are speaking about 100 concurrent users and not the entire company userbase.
Core i5 (although is dual core underneath) is generally meant for desktops, having said this, please note that its difficult to arrive at any recommendation based on simply userbase. You need to have more data with you with respect to amount of transactions, concurrent users, peak period, load during peak period etc.
You need to use SAP's quicksizer to calculate the amount of SAPS for your production servers, SAPS is the unit used to calibrate your hardware for running SAP Applications.
If you provide your SAPS value to hardware vendor, they will advise what CPU rating and how many CPUs you need. They will infact tell you the entire configuration that you need.
you can also buy the following book:
http://www.sap-press.com/products/Sizing-SAP-Systems.html
Regards,
Siddhesh

Conceptual advice required for file receiver scenario

Hi,
My scenario is to read 3 sets of data from SAP ERP and write files on the receiver system, one per data set.
I could create 3 service interfaces and set up Integration Builder configuration for each one but this seems messy.
Alternatively, if I create one service interface with 3 operations to group them, it is not possible to create the required files unless I add mapping and use dynamic configuration to determine the filename from the payload and set this in the receiver communication channel.
It seems to me that I would have benefited from the ability to define a rule in the receiver determination to define a different communication channel per operation where the specific filename could be specified.
It is only possible to bind a service interface to one communication channel in the receiver agreement.
What would you recommend as the cleanest and best approach to meet this requirement - 1 or 3 service interfaces, use of mapping or are there any alternatives?
Thanks in advance.
Alan
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 4, 2011 7:02 PM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 4, 2011 7:02 PM

Basically your requirement is many to many mapping. Please decide based on the sender system requirement. If your sender system sends different message structure then you can break into three diff interfaces and keep the interface simple.
You can route to three diff recievers based on the condition setting in the receiver determination or you can do in the mapping too. That is not the whole point. you need to think about how do pick the three different interfaces. You might also consider using ccbpm for this.
Refer the pattern that comes in the PI standard installation under SAP BASIS SWCV.
BPMPatternSerializeMultipleTrigger or BPMPatternSerializeOneTrigger

Should a new custom ESB contract wsdl required for such a scenario?

Hi,
I am using AIA 2.4 for my client who is integration Web-center 11g with JDE 9.0. The question is more pertaining to design approach that one needs to take for a scenario as this-
The case - an ADF page tries to create a customer in the JDE and uses AIA layer for the movement of business data.Once the customer gets created in the JDE,JDE in turn returns the client Id which ADF needs to navigate to a different page.The ESB currently is based on the entity WSDL(CustomerPartyV2.wsdl) and the operation is create. Since create ops in the above Entity contract is defined as 'async-one way' we cant get any response back to the ADF page via the provider ABC service.
Now to break the impasse, client has suggested if I can extend the entity wsdl file and create a new process wsdl file.But I couldn't convince myself as the need for a custom wsdl file for the EBS. This is becoz we are neither adding new operation nor we are extending a new EBO. The only thing that needs to be done is to make the create operation from async to sync in the wsdl. Unfortunately the Integration guide for 2.4 doesn't lay-down any step as how to tackle such an issue.
Please provide me some guideline on design as how to approach this problem and break the impasse!
Thanks
Prabal
Edited by: user10797754 on Apr 1, 2010 9:14 AM
Edited by: user10797754 on Apr 1, 2010 1:36 PM
Edited by: user10797754 on Apr 1, 2010 1:40 PM

Hi,
In AIA, the CRUD operations but for Query have implemented Asynchronous request / response patterns. Hence, these interfaces are modeled 2 one-way operations. The programming model stated in Integration Development Guide does specify how the client (in AIA, it might be Requester ABCS) can optionally choose to receive the outcome; and also about how the provider service needs to be coded to handle this.
The “responseCode” attribute of the EBM verb is set to indicate to the providing service that the requesting service is expecting a response. This is evaluated in the providing service to send back a response. The Create verb has an optional “ResponseCode” attribute that communicates the payload that is expected in the response message to the “Create” request. . The possible values for the ResponseCode are restricted to either “ID” (response payload is expected to be the Identifier of the object that was created) or “OBJECT” (response payload is expected to be the entire object that was created).
Even though the above programming model does allow for client services to receive the responses about the outcome of create / update / delete / sync operation in an asynchronous way, I would strongly discourage ADF page making a synchronous service call which in turn leverages AIA's asynchronous request / response pattern based services. This synchronous - asynchronous pattern could have performance impact.
I would make two recommendations - one is to follow customer's suggestion - add a new synchronous request / response based operation in process wsdl. But that means, you need to implement requester as well as provider services for that operation; and have ADF page invoke that synchronous requester ABCS.
The other option is to leverage the delivered existing services - clone the requester ABCS and make changes to cloned requester ABCS to update the requester application after receiving the response. Instead of cloning, you could also decide to make inline changes to the delivered requester ABCS - but need to be aware that those changes are not upgrade safe.
The user experience will certainly have to be modified - have the user refresh the screen - refreshing the screen should result in retrieval of the identifier from the data store ; and that could be used to navigate to the specific object. There might slightly be an inconvenience to the end user - but the implementation has all of Quality of Service characteristics such as resiliency, transactionality, guaranteed delivery etc.
Hope it helps.
regards,
Ravi
I

Any Badi required for service procurement scenario?

Dear Guru's
I am configuring the service procurement classic scenario in SRM 7.01. Our requirement is as below:
If the service requisition has backend contract available as a source of supply, it will create a purchase order in the backend ERP system.
However, when it comes to contract, service hierarchy is supported in the srm contract as well. So, unlike srm 7.0, we can create follow-on contract with service hierarchy both in SAP SRM system and backend ERP system. How the system will decide whether to create the contract in the backend system or local SRM system?
If I want to create local contract only from the purchase requisitions with service hierarchy, do I need to take help of the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'? Or i Need the BAdi only if I need to create the contract directly in the backend system.
Secondly, Will the local contract be available as a source of supply in the sourcing cockpit or only the backend contract will be available as a sourcing?
Thanks in advance,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Dear Ricardo,
Thanks for the confirmation. Till SRM 7.0, service hierarchy was not supported in the contract document in SRM. The system behaviour is to create contract with service hierarchy in the backend system. In case of multiple backend systems, we need to use the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'.
Since we are in the SRM 7.01 where the central contract supports service hierarchy, we are proceeding with the approach suggested by you.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Licensing Requirement for my below Scenario:

Hi Friends,
Scenario:
I want to install 4 Servers with Windows 2012-Standard Edition.
Later will configure Hyper-V Cluster on it... on top of this cluster we would like to install 16 "Windows 2012 Standard" Virtual instances.
Please let me know how many "Windows 2012 Standard" License are required?
Thanks in Advance,
Regards, Prabhu B.

Hi Prabhu B,
Please try to contact Microsoft Activation Center for further assistance :
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/existing-customers/activation-centers.aspx
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Inputs required for Sales & Service scenario

Hi All
I have a situation here.
I have to charge my customer for the services period.
Let us say for Example my company has provided services to a customer worth 1000 dollars and now i have to invoice to the customer. But the customer pays 25% for it and 50% by his insurance company and 25% by his employer. How can i do the invoicing process.
Now how can i handle this scenario. Any inputs are appreciated.
Thanks
Sonali

Hi
U can add the Bill to partys and partner function tab
r u doing billing in R3 or CRM
Regards
Manohar

Reg rfc & idoc

hai all,
i want to know exactly the reason why RFC resides on Java stack and where as IDoc resides on Abap stack, as they both belongs to SAP R/3.
Thanking You All,
Mohammed Akmal.

Hey,
Same topic was discusssed y'day check this thread.
Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
Prateek asnwer is most near same as it think of.
<b>Cheers,
*RAJ*
*REWARD POINTS IF FOUND USEFULL*</b>

Reg: Hands on Requirement for OCP Certification in 10G

Hai all,
I am called Prabhu Prashant.R I Live in India(in Chennai). I've passed OCA in 10G and waiting to attend OCP. I am preparing by myself. but you all know that Oracle is insisting to complete a Hands on Requirement Course for certification Purpose. My question is should I complete the course only from OU or can I complete that course in any of the Workforce Development Partner. If there are any one existing in India, learned people please provide me the name of them. I could not afford OU courses because It costs a Hefty.Please Help!!!!.

You can take a required course not only at Oracle University, but also from the Oracle Authorized Center.
See the details from the following links
http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=112
http://www.oracle.com/global/in/education/maps/index.html

Paramters require for doing PO confirmation in SRM

Hi,
We are trying to do Confirmation in SRM by uploading excel file and we are using FM BBP_PD_CONF_CREATE
What are the input paraments we need to pass for this FM to create automatic confirmation.
Thanks,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
You should use the FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL first, map the PO data to the BBP_PD_CONF_CREATE structures, and then insert the input values from the Excel file.
Besides that, inform the I_SRC_GUID as the PO header GUID and I_SAVE as u2018Xu2019.
You should be able to create the Confirmation Document this way.
Regards,
José Omar

Help required for doing LIKE search in SQL

Hello All,
I have situation like below
DECLARE @TempTable TABLE (Name1 VarCHar(100), Name2 VarChar(100))
INSERT INTO @TempTable(Name1, Name2)
VALUES('_HASKAR','BHASK_R')
SELECT *
FROM @TempTable
WHERE Name1 LIKE Name2
Both the columns are having WildCard (underscores). How can I do like search so that the where condition will be TRUE?
Regards,
Amar Ankatha
amar ankatha

Hi,
If I understand correctly, the position of H, A, S, K, R is fixed in the strings and you can use
SUBSTRING function.
DECLARE @TempTable TABLE (Name1 VarCHar(100), Name2 VarChar(100))
INSERT INTO @TempTable(Name1, Name2)
VALUES('_HASKAR','BHASK_R')
SELECT *
FROM @TempTable
WHERE substring(Name1,2,4) = substring (name2,2,4) and right(Name1, 1) = right(Name2, 1)
Thanks.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

RFC Destination is required for R/3 receiver system

Hi All,
Is RFC destination required for R/3 receiver system? Scenario i,e File >XI> RFC
How XI system communicate with R/3 receiver system?
Regards,
Sameer

Hi,
RFC dest is not required in this case, XI will communicate thru RFC channel which you will configure as receiver channel. Hence in this channel, you will mention the required parameters.
Please search this fourm and you will get plenty for blogs with step - to -step details of configuring the FILE 2 RFC scenario.
Regards
Sai Ganesh

Reg: RFC / IDOC required for doing CIDX Scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for