Reg settlement - CJ88

Hello,
Can you please tell me  the procedure how to do actual settlement Project/wbs element/net work.
Please help!!!!!
Thanks
SM

Hi,
Project view does not exists for information systems.
Message no OK 1013
I am using Version 4.7
Thank you
SM

Similar Messages

  • Selecting document type for settlement CJ88

    During project or order settlement (CJ88,KO88) the document type "YP" specified in the Settlement Profile is used for the FI portion of the settlement, WBS to AUC, but the controlling entries use the default FI/CO document type.   We would like all transactions in the settlement process, both FI and CO, to use the document type YP.
    The controlling enties, settlement from WBS to WBS, post to FI through Real Time Integration CO-FI.  If I change the document type in FAGLCOFIIMG from SA to YP then the CO settlement documents begin posting as YP as desired.
    Is there a way to have Real Time CO-FI Integration select a variant by transaction type so it chooses YP for only settlement transactions?  Or is there a better way to have all settlement transactions use the same document type? 
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Go to transaction KOT2_OPA and check against the order type that you use, which settlement profile is assigned.Then go to transaction OKO7 to change the document type for that settlement profile. Document types can be created in transaction OBA7.

  • Error in settlement CJ88

    Hello All,
    Good Day!
    I have encountered error while running CJ88 WBS settlement, according to it:
    "Data Inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted"
    Message no. AAPQ104
    What is the possible cause of this?
    Please advice.
    Thanks in advance!
    Jhero

    Hi,
    Please check the below OSS notes:-
    Note 97388 - Asset transfer: Problems with parallel areas
    Note 124231 - AAPO104 w/o reason in intercompany asset transfer
    Note 210557 - Mass retiremt w/ revenue in case of parallel crcies
    Also check whether there is any deletion of additional dep area recently after the asset creation. If yes, you need to add it again & populate additional Dep in Asset created during trial run by T code AFBN than rerun the settlement issue will be resolved.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • GL linked to project settlement(CJ88)

    Can anyone tell me how I can change the GL the project is settled to when I run transaction CJ88.
    I have checked the project profile and then checked the settlement  profile - allocation structure but cannot see where the GL is specified.
    thanks
    Joe

    CE category defines the nature of CE like which business transaction can be posted via that CE.
    as your CE type is 21: internal settlement, that means it will flow the cost exclusively with in CO (orders,projects,CO-PA,Cost centers.) CE type 22 is just opposite to it (assets,G/L,materials etc.) . System creates an accounting document for it whereas with CE type 21,it will create a CO document and settlement document only.
    Now, coming to your question during a business transaction whenever a CE is generating an accounting document it's impacting FI (P&L or BS accounts)
    Read following link for more info:
    Cost Element Categories - Master Data in Cost Center Accounting (CO-OM-CCA) - SAP Library
    Regards
    Saurabh

  • CJ88 - Settlement values are not appearing in CJ88

    Hi,
    I am not able to see any settlement values when i run CJ88. I have followed below steps.
    1.     Create Sales Order (TC: VA01)
    2.     Post Outbound delivery and PGI for the sales order (TC: VL01N)
    3.     Set the Order (Project) status to REL (TC: CJ20N)
    4.     Create Rework WBS/Network and Activity element at the project (TC: CJ20N)
    5.     Post one direct labor cost and rework entry to the order (CN25) (Use Activity type TECHXX for direct labor cost and RWRKXX for rework labor cost)
    6.     Post overhead (CJ44)
    7.     Post RA (KKA2)
    8.     Post Settlement (CJ88)
    9.     Change the order status from REL to TECO
    10.     Post RA (KKA2)
    11.     Post Settlement (CJ88) (Here you should see the costs posted to rework order should get settled to GL account 600724000)
    I am stucked at step 8, when i ran CJ88, i am not able to see any values. I have checked allocation structure and it is correct. Please help to resolve issue a.s.a.p.

    Hi,
    After step 5 verify CJI3 report. This is to show actuals against a project. Ensure the costs are posted correctly to the project. Next before OH calculation, do CJ88 for netowork so that it settles the cost to WBS Element. Then run the CJ44. During KKA2 verify the values make sure system calculated the PoC correctly. If everything till here is fine then run CJ88 for the WBS. System should picke up the RA values and post the settlement entries.
    PS: all the above assuming RA / Settlement configs are in place.
    Regards
    Sreekanth

  • CJ88 - Final settlement issue

    Hi All,
    Seek solution for this issue:
    After final settlement (CJ88) the cost that is getting settled and posted in FI is equal to the sum of the difference of Closing CTC (cost to complete) for period 10 and Opening CTC for period 10 and the closing CTC for the period.
    But the amount that should actually get settled is the difference of Closing CTC (cost to complete) for period 10 and Opening CTC for period 10. 
    For eg.  the amount that should get settled for Period 10 is 11,85,220.70 (Which is shown in Result Analysis - KKA2 under the head 'Changes in the period - C(period)'. This is the difference of Closing CTC for period 10 and Opening CTC for period 10).
    But the amount that is actually getting settled is, this amount i.e. 1185220.70 + Closing CTC i.e. 29,481,426.30.
    What could be the reason and solution for this? 
    Best regards,
    Nimish Goswamy

    Hi
    First maintain IT16 Contract elements
    IT185-subtype 03gratuity
    For Termintation Work bench both these IT are a must.
    Lock Personnel no in PU03 before running the termination workbench
    pc00_m40_term
    Then Enter personnel no-reason for and notice date and leaving date.
    Gratuity Leave encashment and all other wagetypes can be given at the time of termination workbench for calculating F&FS
    All the amnts are automatically updtd in IT15
    Run the leaving action with the date which was entered in pc00_m40_term
    Release the personnel no in puo3 and run the payroll-pc00_m40_calc
    DO reward points
    regards
    Iyer

  • Validation settlement to AUC or FXA from PS (CJ88)

    Hi All,
    I have an issue when doing settlement from WBS to AUC/FXA.
    Let say the project has a plant call ABCD, then i put settlement rule AUC or FXA..and doing settlement CJ88...but i could settle to AUC / FXA to different plant call CDEF . We decided not to use automatic AUC from IM, we create AUC and FXA from Asset module.
    How to validate that Project plant ABCD only could settle to AUC or FXA which have same plant..
    Cheers,
    Nies

    img-fi-spec purp ledger-tools-maintain validation/substitution rules - maintain substitution
    substitution rule under financial acc -line items
    create a substitution for doc type and get plant from WBS
    for this use substitution by exit for plant UF101
    Now write a program ZGGBS000 (config is in txn GCX2) to get plant from wherever you want

  • Settlement within the Project

    Hi All,
    There is an error during settlement -
    > CJ88 from a long time. My settlement structure is like Network to WBS, Lower WBS to Superior WBS, Level1 WBS to AuC and finally to FXA.
    My availability control is active after CJ30.
    Now when settling within the project system throws error.... Budget exceeded for items and exceeded by the assigned value. Fine I found out OSS Note--->159850 which details the reason why it is behaving so.
    Now after reading this note I am trying out both the possibilities mentioned there...
    1.Deactivate availability control which is not recommended.
    2.In CJ30 only do budgeting for top WBS..
    3.Exempt Settlement Cost element from Availability Control(but we are using Cost Element groups -
    > All Primary and Secondary Cost Elements) Tr--OPTK.which is also a problem
    I need a work around if anybody can help...the simplest way to remove such error during settlement.

    this has nothing to do with the cost element group
    when you settle
    you can either use the original cost element OR you can use settlement cost element (type 21 or type 22) - these are usually one or 2 and not the same as your chart of accounts
    these settlement cost elements should be entered in OPTK
    if you use original cost elements then you have an issue as you cannot use OPTK else the original cost itself would become exempt from budget check

  • Automatic Settlement rules generation

    PS Experts
    I need to have automatic settlement rule generation for WBS elements.
    I do have all the config (PS & IM) in place and when i release my WBS element then AUC is automatically created and no settlement rules are generated at this point.
    But when i create FINAL ASSET, then the settlement rules are generated automatically with final asset as the receiver. When i run my final settlement (CJ88) then the settlement rule is updated with AUC & Final asset.
    My question is do i need to have Investment profile to have automatic creation of settlement rules.
    What if i don't want to activate IM and still have automatic settlement rule generation?
    Edited by: Raj M on Apr 17, 2008 8:49 PM

    Hi,
    For automtic settlement rule generation folloowing steps need to be followed.
    1. Determine Strategy for Settlement Rule
    In this there will be settings for settlement rule where we define the recevier cost object after project settlement.
    This strategy will be assigned to project profile
    2. Generate Settlement
    CJB2 transaction need to be run for generation settlement for the WBSE.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

  • Rejection of WBS settlement step in SAP PS

    Dear Experts,
    I have on e new requirement to ignore WBS settlement step from SAP PS flow.
    Current scenarion ;-
    WBS --> Network --> Activity --> Material Po -->Budgeting --> Release budget -->PO creation --> GRN --> GI --> MIRO -->AS01   --> CJIC --> Settlement CJ88 --> Activity Confirm --> WBS Techo --> WBS Closed.
    Require Scenarion :-
    WBS --> Network --> Activity --> Material Po -->Budgeting --> Release budget -->PO creation --> AS01 --> GRN --> GI --> MIRO ->Activity Confirm --> WBS Techo --> WBS Closed.
    At the time of GRN only item should be cpitalised.
    can anybody explain is it possible? if not then why?
    Please explain impact on PS module.
    Please do needful.
    Thanks & Regars,
    Arvind Tirlotkar.

    Hi,
    I think you are talking about direct capital item procurement.
    you can make statistical project for that; then the wbs will only be used for budget check and you don't have to settle also.
    at the time of pr/po creation you can have wbs element field and asset field in account assignment tab (get with the help of MM consultant); all cost will got o asset and budget will be checked against wbse.
    Regards,
    Harsh.

  • Statistical Posting for PS settlement in Funds Management ECC 6.0

    Hi people
    Previously in 4.6C, WBS settlement (CJ88) will result in statistical posting in Funds Mgmt.
    But now after upgrade to ECC 6.0, it is now considered as actual posting.
    I know there is setting under FMCIA where you can set certain commitment item to be a statistical commitment item but we don't want to do that since the commitment is being used for other situation where we do want it to be an actual posting.
    Anybody know how to solve this.
    thank you very much
    irwan

    Hi,
    You can manage it easily via FMDERIVE functionalities. Define a rule, where depending on busniess transaction (KOAO), the derived commitment item will be a statistical one (the other one, from what you use for regular postings).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Customer project Settlement

    Dear All,
    i am working in customer projects. Actual cost and revenues r flowing.The RA key to the top WBS Element which is also billing element. I heve done the revenue based result anlaysis.Profit and loss are showing in RA. Now i want to settle the project to CO-PA.
    Given settlement rule to top WBS Element and all other lower WBS element have profile not ot settle.if i run settlement CJ88 then nothing is flowing and not any error.
    Need solution.

    Dear,
    i m settleing the lower level WBS Element to top WBS Element which is billing element and result analysis is done for that top wbse .Then i want to settle the top wbse to profibility segement .Then after trying some config steps and defining PA transfer strature settlement of lower level wbse to upper level wbse is going well and accounting document is creating well.And CJI3 report its flowing well.
    but in top WBSE the rule is profibility segment.I've done the result analysis and the net value (revenue-actual cost)
    is also showing.That value is on the lower level wbse and that only value is going to TOP wbse after settlement.
    but now i want to settle this top wbse but its showing no accured cost or revenue.
    Is the process i m using is correct or i've to do it by some other method.The RA valuation method is revenue based.
    sukhveer

  • RA Settlement User Exit for Posting rules

    Hi,
    For settlement of RA data the postings rules are defined in OK8G and the same are used while running settlement CJ88 or CJ8G.
    My question is do we have a user exit which kicks in at the time of settlement and could let us change the rules for a certain set of Projects?
    OR if we could have a substitution rule in place that could kick in at the time of settlement and would pick up the rule based on a critria?
    The reason for the above question is because we are trying to settle the Projects based on two selection critira:
    a) Based on RA key i.e. for RA key A use posting rule "123" and for projects with RA key B use posting rules "456".
    b) Based on the Work in Progress ( POCI and POCS) values we need to further decide if we need to change the posting rule or use exiting one.
    If RA key = A
      use rule "123"
          else if WIP position < 0
            use rule "123"
         else use rule "456"
    End

    Ankush,
    These are the routines for validation / substitutions where in you can write your own code. Check it in SE38.
    Regards
    Sreekanth

  • Problems with revenue's settlement

    Good morning,
    When I execute a revenue settlement (CJ88) from WBS to asset, the following error appears:
    The sender has revenues or customer down payments with cost element 112030 (business transaction: CO Through-postings from FI).
    You cannot settle these revenues or customer down payments to receiver FXA 40000005 0.
    We're using cost element category 11 and the revenue posting is recorded in PS table. Moreover, we recorded the cost element in allocation structure.
    Is it possible to settle revenues to asset under construction?
    thanks
    Marcel

    if the revenue is set up as negative cost then it should be fine

  • Project system - Settlement

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I have problem when executing a project settlement - CJ88, I have an error as :
    No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds
    Diagnosis
    A company code clearing transaction requires that you maintain clearing
    accounts for each of the company codes involved.
    System Response
    You must carry out company code clearing for the posting.
    You cannot carry out the posting if you have not assigned any
    clearing accounts.
    Procedure
    Maintain the clearing accounts.
    Can someone explain what is the clearing account that refer here, and where to maintain the clearing account?
    Many thanks!
    WL
    Point will be reward for useful point.

    thsk Paul, your note is helpful although the root of the problem is caused by others and I have got my problem solved .
    Points already rewarded to you..

Maybe you are looking for