Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"
Hi Gurus,
I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
Pls advice on this.
Regards,
Venu
Hi
There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards
Raja
Similar Messages
-
Hello Experts,
I have small doubt in vendor evaluation; we are not purchased any material from vendor X. But when I run the evaluation transaction (ME61 and ME63) it will give the some score. My question is why it is giving score? It should be a 0.
Kindly any one suggest me why it is happening.
Reg/ ShankarHi Shankar
Manual scores can be given even when you did not purchase any material.
This means you have given manual scores. The final score 46 is calculated based on the weightages you have given to price, quality & delivery.
Does this clarify ?
Best regards
Ramki -
Hi All,
We have configured the vendor evaluation in our ECC 5.0 Dev system.
We have Defined the main criteria, respective sub criteria s, weighting keys and also the purchase org level data.
The weighting level is equal.
The scoring methods have also been set such as:
For Main Criteria Delivery, Subcriterias such as On Time delivery, Quantity reliability, Adherence to confirmation date ...etc has been given the scoring methods.
3 for On Time delivery
2 for Quantity reliability
B for Adherence to confirmation date.
The point scores for these methods have also been set with scales such as
for 5.0 % score is 20
for 20.0 % score is 10
for 50.0 % score is 5
for 99.9 % score is 1
In ME61 the vendor evaluation is created.
We tried 2 scenarios.
Scenario 1: Where the purchase order is created and the receipt is done at a later date than mentioned in the PO as the delivery confirmation date.
Scenario 2: Where the purchase order is created and the receipt is taken for a quantity which is less than the quantity ordered.
When the vendor evaluation is carried out in ME61 Automatic New Evaluation or ME63 we get the result for only price and that too
The score is 1.
The weighting is 100%
The overall score is 1
My Doubt is why isn't there a calculation on the scores done for criteria 03 - Delivery ???
It shows a score of 0. But the scenarios mentioned should have populated the score for Delivery, I presume.
Please advice where I have gone wrong or what is that I have missed to configure.
Regards
Govind
Edited by: Govind Ramesh on Aug 23, 2011 11:54 AMI can see that you are using a ZSAP update group , and think this is the root cause for all your problems.
See OSS Note 397864 - Self-defined info structures purchasing similar to S013
it explains:
Therefore, you are not permitted
a) to use info structure S013 as a template for self-defined info structures (This is prevented as of Release 4.5 due to a termination message).
b) to create any update rules for S013 with a self-defined update group.
c) to include the enhanced update rules that are used for S013 during the definition of key figure updating into the definition of the update of a self-defined info structure (compute...).
Sorry for this late update, just saw that you found it yourself, I had the reply open but then went for a breakfast without sending.
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Aug 24, 2011 9:55 AM -
Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date
Hi,
The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
with regardsUse this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM -
Vendor evaluation criteria rejects/complaints
Hi,
I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ?
Also is it mandatory to use the Q2/F2 notifications types for vendor evaluation.? What if I create my own Z notification type with origin Q2 ? Will vendor eval still work ?
ThanksHi Shailendra,
I am aware of all these settings and have gone thru your document as well. However if you read my post carefully you will see what I am actually asking.
"I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ? "
My question is...how do I show all the notificaitons of type external origin when I run my ME63 report ? Right now no matter how many notifications I create and assign the the external origin, they dont show up in ME63.
Thanks -
Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance
Hi,
We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation. I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these. Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to?
Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
Percentage
Score
0
100
10
90
20
95
100
80
200
60
300
40.......
When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are? Or is there another way to look at it?
Thanks
BeverlyHave you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank to 99.9 and your from -99.9 to blank
this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week each day corresponds to 20% -
Dear friends !
I have a doubt about Vendor Evaluation criteria calculation.
For example , Price
Into Price(main criteria) we have Price Level and Price history.
SAP calculate scores to price using which tables ? this criteria is accumulated by month ? or by Purchase order ?
Does anyone could help to understand the places where SAP catch data to calculate vendor scores ?I really do not understood the help.sap.com regarding this subject.
Best regards,
AleHi Alessandro Brazil
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
Thanks -
Delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation
hi
where we maintain the delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation.
nitinHi,
Delivery date in vendor evaluation is a subcriteria for On time delivery and its automatic (3)
Delivery date is calculated from GR from stastical delivery date in delivery schedule TAB and actual receipt date
Hope this is clear to you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful -
Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation
Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
PratapHello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards, -
Dear Gurus,
Are there any BAPIS available for vendor evaluation?
I had created a few vendor evaluation criteria that requires manual input of the vendor score. However, these scores cannot be further breakdown to a plant level.
Thus, I am trying to find a bapi that allows me to update vendor evaluation scores for those criteria I defined at the plant level.
Please advice. Thank you.
Best Regards,
JosephHi W1N,
If we run ME6H, there is an option to break down the scores to the plant/site level. I was wondering if there are any BAPIs that can achieve the same functionality.
Based on this report, I think that in the background, SAP still tracks the scores at plant level?
Best Regards
Joseph -
Vendor evaluation delivery subcriteria's calculation verification - reg
Dear Experts,
In display vendor evaluation & Standard analysis we get to know the quantity reliability, on time delivery criterias individual scores but can anyone plz guide the tcode to verify the score calculation for delivery and quality criterias. Ontime delivery and quantity reliabiltiy verification mc$6, mc$8 respective tcodes values not satisfactory to us for analysis.
(We have analyzed the Price criteria - "price level" factors by comparing info record/PO price history and effective price of vendors).
Simillarly plz guide how to confirm scores that are getting calculated is correct or not for
delivery criterias - quantity reliabililty, on time delivery.
Plz solve this issue.
full rewards assured.
Thanks & Regards,
Viju.Hi,
I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks. -
Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month
Dear Gurus,
I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
Thanks & Regards
AkshayI don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get a 100 % -
How to add criteria in vendor evaluation
Hi friends,
For vandor evaluation , I wants to add 'Criteria' how can i add it.
Regards,
Mahesh.Hi Mahesh,
Vendor Evaluation comes with the standard main criterions Price,Quality,Delivery and Services and Sub criterias.
It's possible to add the criteria through config.
Regards,
Bijoy Kumar S.P. -
Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria
Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar PitlaT147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance -
Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria
Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regardshi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance Score
-99.9% 1
+99.9% 100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran
Maybe you are looking for
-
HT4436 one apple ID for 2 people?
My husband and i have a mac and 2 ipod shuffles. We both use one Apple ID to use iTunes to purchase music since we both like the same music. We want to get iPhones, but can we both access that iTunes acct on the phones while having separate AppleIDs
-
How do I select a range of rows from an internal table in the debugger?
Hi, I have a case where I wanted to delete a range of rows (several thousand) from an internal table using the debugger. It seems that rows can only be selected one at a time by selecting (clicking) on the far left side of the row. This is cumbersome
-
Is there any way to prevent excess rows from being added to a table on the front panel?
Whenever I programmatically add rows through a property node I can still go into the front panel and keep adding additional rows through the table. Is there any way to prevent this "excess scrolling"? Maybe grey out the rows or something? At least I
-
Itunes cannot open beacuase it has detected a problem with audio configuration
i have the same poblem my Itunes cannot open beacuase it has detected a problem with your aduio configuration i saw the answer to that question and i tryed it but my computer was already to those settings and my Itunes is still not working i realy ne
-
How do I get iPhoto to stop pulling from two photo streams?
My iPhoto library is saved on an external hard drive and I've opened it on 2 separate macs and each mac has it's own separate account linked to it, now my iPhoto is pulling photos from 2 separate photo streams. How do I fix this?