Reg: WNA11 Rule Writing for Payroll

Hi All,
Does any body having information or documentation regarding WNA11 Rule Writing for Payroll system.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ratan Sonti.

Hi,
Please see a sample rule which I uploaded on this site:
<a href="http://img131.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rulera7.gif">Sample Rule</a>
In this rule, operations like OUTWP and MODIF are used.
<b>Reward points appreciated</b>,
Thank You,

Similar Messages

No posting rules exist for account key while doing purchae order.

Hi SAP Expert,
I have following problem while doing purchae order.
No posting rules exist for account key
Message no. FF714
Diagnosis
No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
Please give me reply.
Thanks in advance,
Yogesh.

check MM pricing procedure for any condition account key is assigned and for that account key, no GL is configured in OBYC, if it is related to tax condition type OB40.
regs,
ramesh b

Doubts In creating rule file for the given flat file.

Dear All,
How to create the rule file for following data. Kindly guide us to proceed further.
"Sales" "COGS" "Margin" "Marketing" "Payroll" "Misc" "Total Expenses" "Profit" "Opening Inventory" "Additions" "Ending Inventory" "Margin %" "Profit %"
"100-10" "New York"
"Jan" "Actual" 678 271 407 94 51 0 145 262 2101 644 2067 60.02949852507374 38.64306784660767
"Feb" "Actual" 645 258 387 90 51 1 142 245 2067 619 2041 60 37.98449612403101
"Mar" "Actual" 675 270 405 94 51 1 146 259 2041 742 2108 60 38.37037037037037
"Qtr1" "Actual" 1998 799 1199 278 153 2 433 766 2101 2005 2108 60.01001001001001 38.33833833833834
"Apr" "Actual" 712 284 428 99 53 0 152 276 2108 854 2250 60.1123595505618 38.76404494382022
"May" "Actual" 756 302 454 105 53 1 159 295 2250 982 2476 60.05291005291006 39.02116402116403
"Jun" "Actual" 890 356 534 124 53 0 177 357 2476 1068 2654 60 40.1123595505618
"Qtr2" "Actual" 2358 942 1416 328 159 1 488 928 2108 2904 2654 60.05089058524173 39.35538592027142
"Jul" "Actual" 912 364 548 127 51 0 178 370 2654 875 2617 60.08771929824561 40.57017543859649
"Aug" "Actual" 910 364 546 127 51 0 178 368 2617 873 2580 60 40.43956043956044
"Sep" "Actual" 790 316 474 110 51 1 162 312 2580 758 2548 60 39.49367088607595
"Qtr3" "Actual" 2612 1044 1568 364 153 1 518 1050 2654 2506 2548 60.03062787136294 40.19908116385911
"Oct" "Actual" 650 260 390 91 51 1 143 247 2548 682 2580 60 38
"Nov" "Actual" 623 249 374 87 51 0 138 236 2580 685 2642 60.03210272873194 37.88121990369181
"Dec" "Actual" 699 279 420 97 51 1 149 271 2642 671 2614 60.08583690987125 38.76967095851216
"Qtr4" "Actual" 1972 788 1184 275 153 2 430 754 2548 2038 2614 60.04056795131846 38.23529411764706
Thanks And regards
Sai

Hi,
Create 1 text file in this way, the file is tab separated. The first line is Header line. So do a setting to skip that line while you are loading a data.(Options -> Data Source Property -> Header -> No of lines to skip 1)
"Product" "market" "Period" "Scenario" "Sales" "COGS" "Margin"..... "Profit %"
100-10 New York Jan Actual 678 271 407 94 51 0 145 262 2101 644 2067 60.02949853 38.64306784660767
100-10 New York Feb Actual 645 258 387 90 51 1 142 245 2067 619 2041 60 37.98449612403101
and copy paste all your complete data lines below this and save your text file.
Create 1 rule file and open this text file in it and then provide a field settings one by one. Do the necessary settings also.
Hope this helps.
regards
SST.....

Guide for Payroll Schema

Hi all,
pls help us configuration for Payroll Schema step by step with international payroll
Thanks for support

Creating Custom Schemas and Rules
Schema and Rule Naming Conventions
Customer modified schemas and rules need to begin with Z. Many customers simply replace the first letter of the standard schema with a Z u2013 i.e., their modified copy of UAP0 becomes ZAP0. But there can be problems with that convention. For example, you might later implement Canadian payroll and need a modified version of schema KAP0, but ZAP0 is already used for the U.S. For many years, I've used a naming convention of Z plus the country identifier and a sequential number for modified rules and schemas. So a modified UAP0 would become ZU01 and a modified KAP0 becomes ZK01.
Editor Documentation
Documentation for the function, operation, schema, and rule editors is available online at http://help.sap.com. Click on SAP R/3 and R/3 Enterprise and then select your release level and language. Then navigate to the Human Resources>HR Tools section.
F1 Help
In the schema and rule editors, place your cursor on a function or operation and press F1 to get help text. A schema or a rule's documentation is available in the editor via the Goto>Documentation menu. In the schema editor, the F4 key shows possible values for each of the four parameters for whatever function is entered on that line. The same documentation u2013 and more u2013 is available via transaction PDSY.
Creating a Test Schema
For testing purposes, it is useful to have a version of the payroll schema that does not care about the control record (transaction PA03) settings. Bypassing the control record lets you run and save the results for any pay period needed, without having to update the control record. There's no problem with having such a schema around, since the payroll driver does not save payroll results from a schema that ignores the control record in a production system. For examples, I will show you how to create two schemas u2013 ZUA0, which will be used in production and will check the control record, and ZUAT, which ignores the control record and is used for testing purposes only.
First, create a copy of SAP's schema UIN0 and name it ZUA2. In the schema editor (transaction PE02) enter schema UIN0, and click the copy button, or Schema>Copy in the menu. Enter ZUA2 for the To schema. Then edit ZUA2 and make the CHECK ABR line executable by removing the asterisk in the D column. The CHECK function is commented out by SAP in the standard schema, so you uncomment it here for use in the main ZUA0 schema.

View for PAYROLL transactions

I am working on a drilldown Report where by I need to generate ALL detailed transaction for a particular period.
I found some views useful for some modules like XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V a,XLA_AR_REC_AEL_SL_V etc .
I am not able to locate the view for PAYROLL transactions.
I actually need a view that holds ALL the transactions posted for PayRoll in details Such as : Desc-"Salary for John for Jan" Dr"40,000". I would have taken my information from the journals(Gl_je_headers and Gl_je_lines) but that, is not detail enough.
I notice for other modules Similar view start with "XLA_" exist.
It is very Urgent.
Thank You.

I am working on a drilldown Report where by I need to generate ALL detailed transaction for a particular period.
I found some views useful for some modules like XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V a,XLA_AR_REC_AEL_SL_V etc .
I am not able to locate the view for PAYROLL transactions.
I actually need a view that holds ALL the transactions posted for PayRoll in details Such as : Desc-"Salary for John for Jan" Dr"40,000". I would have taken my information from the journals(Gl_je_headers and Gl_je_lines) but that, is not detail enough.
I notice for other modules Similar view start with "XLA_" exist.
It is very Urgent.
Thank You.

An out-of-sequence check is not permitted for payroll type B

We had to do advance payments for 4 pay periods for an employee through offcycle workbench. One of the checks was wrong so we had to reverse it. It is an out of sequence reversal. Now when i try to do a correction run , it gives me an error An out-of-sequence check is not permitted for payroll type B
How can i run the correction run now. Please help
Edited by: sagarika sharma on Aug 14, 2010 6:29 AM

Check with SAP note 1425764,696067 and 1127119.
Mohan

Posting rules exist for account key

Hi ,
I got the message while creating PO AND WHEN I try to enter Tax code and Tax Jurisdiction i am getting the following error message :
No posting rules exist for account key
Message no. FF714
Diagnosis
No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
Procedure
Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
can any one give me solution to solve this issue !!!
Thanks & Regards,
senthil.

Hi Senthil
Based on your explanation I can understand that the Configuration settings for Automatic Account Determination is not done perfectly for the Account Ket vs GL Account. Do cneck this process carefully because here we define the posting rule, posting keys for the determined account key and later assign the same to the GL Account.
regards
Murali Kanth Natti

Creation of rule file for adding aliases to Members

Please help me in creation of rule file for adding of aliases to the members. I have created a new alias table along with default alias table.
These are the members and alias names for the newly created alias table.
0000002452     TA
0000002459     HJ
0000002460     HK
0000002462     HM
0000004012     CB
0000004015     EA
0000004025     BA
0000004070     DA
0000004087     GC
0000004088     FD
0000006231     CM
0000009103     WP
0000009106     WV
0000009126     WW
0000008458     NH
0000008475     NY
0000008481     NF
0000008483     NG
The below are the members and aliases for the default alias table.
0000001209     P&S Storage Facilities
0000001210     1210 US Procurement & Supply
0000002452     Warren Truck Assembly
0000002459     Toledo I Assembly
0000002460     Toledo II Assembly
0000002462     Toledo III Assembly
0000004001     US Manufacturing Group Office
0000004012     Jefferson North Assembly
0000004015     Belvidere Assembly
0000004025     Sterling Heights Assembly
0000004070     Newark Assembly
0000004087     St Louis North Assembly II
0000004088     St Louis South Assembly II
0000004199     Pilot Operations
0000004501     Opm
0000005111     Kokomo Casting
0000005203     Trenton Engine
0000005205     Kenosha Engine
0000005209     New Mack Avenue Engine
0000005304     Detroit Axle
0000005305     Kokomo Complex
0000005308     Indiana Transmission
0000005403     New Castle Machining & Forge
0000005404     McGraw Glass
0000005406     Toledo Machining
0000006203     Warren Stamping
0000006204     Twinsburg Stamping
0000006215     Sterling Heights Stamping
0000006231     Conner Avenue Assembly
0000002100     2100 Sales & Marketing
0000005221     GEMA - Plant1 Ops
0000009006     9006 Canadian Customs
0000009008     Canadian Manufacturing Group Office
0000009103     Windsor Assembly
0000009104     Etobicoke Casting
0000009106     Pillette Road Assembly
0000009126     Bramalea Assembly
0000008458     Atos
0000008475     Saltillo Truck Plant
0000008481     Toluca Assembly Plant
0000008483     Lago Alberto Truck Plant
Now I have to create rule files to update these aliases.
Please elaborate, so that it will be clear for me. As I am new, please make it up with steps.

You dont need to create a rule file. You can create a alias table like this in a notapad
$ALT_NAME 'First'
0000002452 TA
0000002459 HJ
0000002460 HK
0000002462 HM
0000004012 CB
0000004015 EA
0000004025 BA
0000004070 DA
0000004087 GC
0000004088 FD
0000006231 CM
0000009103 WP
0000009106 WV
0000009126 WW
0000008458 NH
0000008475 NY
0000008481 NF
0000008483 NG
$END
and Save it as First.alt and You can import like this
1)Open the outline in edit mode.
2)Select Outline > Import alias table.
3)In the Open dialog box, select the alias table import file.
4)Click OK.
go to outline properties and the new alias table must be made Set as active to view the alias names.
you can create and import up to 10 alias tables

Aggregation rule ignored for Logical sources

Hi,
We are using materialized views as logical sources for our logical tables. These logical sources contain aggregated data at higher level for dimensions. However, we have a logical source at the most detailed level for the dimensions.
Problem: We OBIEE hits the correct logical source based on dimensions selected in answers, it does not apply the default aggregation rule.
For instance, if a measure has aggregation as AVG, then when the logical sources corresponding to aggregated tables are queried, OBIEE does not apply AVG function. However, it does apply the aggregation rule when it uses the logical source at the most detailed level.
I have specified the aggregation content properly for every dimension.
Any pointers to debug the issue will be helpful.
Thanks,

Click on LTS of Table - Column Mapping - Select the logical column - click on expression - Put your logic here. You will get Aggregation rule is enalbed for the column.
Why ? -- Reason could be nested aggregation is not allowed. Aggregation on the normal column applied during query generation at run time. If you use that Agg.Measure to derive another Agg.measure server could not recognize it during runtime.

Unable to provision Business Rules access for users

Hi all,
Our analytic server is properly configured in Shared Services : we can correctly create users, provision Essbase access for those users, change password, etc...
An application business rules is visible in the left pane of shared services, but we are not able to provision Business rules access for users.
When we try to provision access for a user, we have only access to the Analytic properties.
What's going wrong ?

It sounds like the user you login to HSS with hasn't been assigned with "Provisioning Mgr" rights to business rules.
Get the HSS admin user to grant you these rights and you should then be able to provision users to use Business RUles.
Gee

Mail rules work for some users, don't work for others

Ready to pull my hair out over this one:
Leopard to Snow Leopard upgrade went uneventfully, except for the fact that server-side mail rules (accessed via browser at FQDN -> Mail Rules) work for several users (two, to be exact) and don't for the rest (about 15 or so).
The usual culprits have been reviewed: 'Enable Server-Side Mail Rules' is checked in Mail -> Settings -> Filters, 'Allow users to configure server-side mail rules' is checked in Web -> Sites -> Web Services, users can create vacation notices and email rules without issue via browser, permissions look fine on the contents of /Library/Email Rules and /var/spool/imap/dovecot/sieve-scripts, logs give no indication of any foul play (at least the Email Rules -> debug.log generates the same entries for both functional and non-functional users), etc.
I have noticed that /var/spool/imap/dovecot/sieve-scripts contains only two items, which - you guessed it - line up with the GUIDs of the two functional users. Theoretically every user with a rule should be represented here.
As suggested in this thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11171395&#11171395
I created both a vacation notice and an email rule for several users, thinking that may force the folder creation for those users, but no dice. I even manually created folders for a few users with their GUIDs as the folder names and assigned each user ownership and read/write access. Still nothing. Created a few new test user accounts just to rule out any legacy account weirdness (although it's worth noting that I completely redid the OD and recreated user accounts after the upgrade) and replicated the problem with these, as well. Lastly, used Inspector to compare OD attributes between functional and non-functional accounts, with no glaring differences.
Help!

Did you find an answer? I encounter the same problem on my new MiniServer. Deleted and created all users several times, but just for some accounts mail is working.
Do you have the answer?
(new to this site, read a lot already, but not found)

Where we r customizing for Payroll Checks

Hi,
I made changes to the Program assigned to F110(Automatic Payment Run). I want make sure that these changes not effected the Payroll Checks. can anyone guide me where we are assigning the Program and Layout for the Payroll Checks. I want to give the Technical Details about this to My Manager. I know these changes won't effect to the Payroll Checks.
Please Guide me.
Regards,
Nagesh.

Hi Nagesh,
What program did you change? for Payroll checks, the Program used is RFFOUS_C and the Custom Layout set if any is assigned on the selection screen under 'Output Control'.. otherwise ist is the std F110_PRENUM_CHK. More often than not we will be using custom layout sets...
Regards,
Suresh Datti

Report for Posting Rule details for Functions/items

Hello
Is there a standard program in SAP to take a report or listing of extract in MS Excel of the posting rule details configuration settings in SAP-JVA. I am fairly certain there is a program to extract the details in Excel but I am not sure what is the name of that program and how to use it. I appreciate any ABAP programmer or expert can guide me how to go about this listing.
Thanks

Hi Raghavendra,
In order to do postings in JVA, we create posting methods and under that Posting method we have to create and configure posting rules. Under the posting method, there are SAP JVA processes or functions and function items that are used to create the posting rules. The posting rules details are specified for each function and function item combination and involve the specification of Recovery indicator along with posting keys, SE indicator and billing indicator.
I am not convinced that the standard codes in my system for posting keys, recovery indicators and billing indicators are exactly the same as the default settings and I need to check it along with the posting rule details.
Please see the screenshots attached to give you an idea. I am looking for an ABAP program or report program to take out a listing of these posting rules details from the system.
Spro - JVA - Posting rules fig 0
Posting method / Posting rules screen - fig 1
Posting rule item codes for function CCOP
Posting rule details for function/item CCOP/AC

Update rule/routine for 0PUR_C04

hi experts,
can someone give the update rule/routine for uploading 0ORDER_VAL(effective order value) into the cube 0PUR_C04 and the calculations for it?
and also some explantion on how this effective purchase order value 0ORDER_VAL is calculated*??
thanks

Hi Surya,
If you are using standard content for 0PUR_C04, you can get the update rule in standard update rules, which you can see in Business content on Metadata repository. For standard content four data source used to fill cube. Purchasing Group (2LIS_02_S011 ), Purchasing Data (2LIS_02_HDR), Pur.Data (2LIS_02_SCL) and Purchasing Data (2LIS_02_ITM). The mapping for different update rules are done as:
2LIS_02_S011: Direct Mapping
2LIS_02_HDR: No Update
2LIS_02_SCL: Routine (mm_convert_effwr)
fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor ent *ries
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '001' or "Bestellu *ng
COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '011' or
COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '021' or
COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '004' or "LP
COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '014' or
COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '024' )
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-ORDER_VAL <> 0.
perFORM LOC_CURR_CONVERT
USING COMM_STRUCTURE-ORDER_VAL
COMM_STRUCTURE-DOC_DATE
COMM_STRUCTURE-ORDER_CURR
COMM_STRUCTURE-LOC_CURRCY
COMM_STRUCTURE-EXCHG_RATE
CHANGING RESULT.
if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
RETURNCODE = 0.
else.
RETURNCODE = 4.
endif.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
2LIS_02_ITM: No Update
Hope this will give you some lead.
Regards,
Kams

Order type Z031 plant AT01. No checking rule mantained for operation

Hello PS Gurus,
I am trying to create a new element PEP, and when i tried to release the element PEP i get.
Order type Z031 plant AT01. No checking rule mantained for operation
Can someone tell me what is missing in our customization?
Best Regards
João Fernandes

I assume you are trying to attach materials to network activity which is assigned to WBS.
Your error is because of missing configuration in below mentioned node:
In SPRO maintain the 'Define Checking Control' under Project Systems->Material->Availability Check (T code OPJK)
For plant AT01 and Order Type Z031 maintain parameters which are suitable to you. Before this you need to check the node OPJJ.
Regards
Sreenivas
Pls close this post if satisfied.

Reg: WNA11 Rule Writing for Payroll

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for