Regard ora-01207: How Oracle judge file is more recent than control file - old control file

ORA-00283: recovery session canceled due to errors
ORA-01122: database file 2 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 2: '/tmp/auxsys.dbf_rman'
ORA-01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file
How Oracle judge file is more recent than control file - old control file, then it thrown out error ora-01207.
It must compare data file with control file, but what compare?

Begin from the beginning.
Did you do a RESTORE DATABASE ?
Or did you selectively restore datafiles ?
Strange datafile name --- looks like it could have been a DATAFILECOPY done using rman.
It is a very bad idea to have a datafile in /tmp On some OSs, /tmp may get cleared of files on a reboot.
Hemant K Chitale

Similar Messages

ORA-01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file

Hi,
Today while i am multiplexing control files, i am getting error
ORA-01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file
Action taken:
a) shutdown the db
b) make changes in the control file by replacing all control files with a single good one control file
c) startup nomount pfile
d) create spfile from pfile
e) startup the database
But getting the below errors:
ORA-01122: database file 1 failed verification check
ORA- 01110: data file 1:
ORA - 01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file
Can anyone help on same
Regards
Vikas Kohli

Vikas Kohli wrote:
Hi,
Today while i am multiplexing control files, i am getting error
ORA-01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file
Action taken:
a) shutdown the db
b) make changes in the control file by replacing all control files with a single good one control file
c) startup nomount pfile
d) create spfile from pfile
e) startup the database
But getting the below errors:
ORA-01122: database file 1 failed verification check
ORA- 01110: data file 1:
ORA - 01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file
Can anyone help on same
Regards
Vikas Kohli
Please read the following MOS ID: Starting Database Returns ORA-01122, ORA-0110, and ORA-01207 (Doc ID 1011193.6)

ORA-00338: ORA-00338: log 2 of thread 1 is more recent than control file

Hi, I am getting error "ORA-00338: log 2 of thread 1 is more recent than control file"
My os is RHEL 5.5, 64-bit
Database version is 11.1.0.7
Help !

VinodNagpure wrote:
But we were not cloning this instance, and the instance which was being cloned is ok. The database as well as the application is open. The issue is with another database running on the same server.I suspect that the "working" DB has a file that over-wrote a file of the DB reporting the errors.
*NIX OS is not idiotproofed against somebody fumble fingering file name.

I have already assigned photos from iPhoto to folders in Pictures on the Mac using the instructions from Adobe. How do i now move more recent photos from iPhoto without duplication and import into Lightroom?

I have already assigned photos from iPhoto to folders in Pictures on the Mac using the instructions from Adobe. How do i now move more recent photos from iPhoto without duplication and import into Lightroom?

If the images are in the location you want them be sure to select "Add" at the top of the import dialog box.

When situation causes Firefox cache file to have Windows modified date more recent than the access date?

I'm reviewing a report from a forensic examination of a hard drive from a Windows machine. In that report are Firefox 3.x cache files where the Windows modified date is more recent than both the Windows created date and the Windows accessed date, with the latter two dates the same. For instance, the modified date might be March 23, 2011 at 10:30 am, and the created and accessed dates might be March 17 at 9:50 pm. What actions, by Firefox, a user, or some other program (other than a date-modification tool) would cause this state of affairs? I'm generally familiar with these dates and under what conditions they change, but have found no doc explaining this particular situation...

In your example,
*the site was originally visited on March 17 at 9:50 pm and the cache entry was created; at that time all three dates should be the same
*the user visited the site again and the information in that cache file was modified on that second visit, March 23, 2011 at 10:30 am
*my experience makes me agree with the first answer in the first link below that accessed timestamp on Windows system is not always accurate; '''''AND''''' accessed timestamp differs for files and folders as defined in the third link below
*See:
**http://superuser.com/questions/232143/windows-7-file-properties-is-date-accessed-always-100-accurate
**http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724290%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
**http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365739%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Study: Oracle database software has more flaws than SQL Server

Hi,
Study: Oracle database software has more flaws than SQL Server
Microsoft is often unfairly slammed for security issues, says NGSS
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9005383&intsrc=hm_list
Post your comments on this stupid artical.
Thanks!
M T

This is a case where size does matter.
When they say errors reported on oracle are about 4 times more than the ones reported on SQL server they forgot to say something like: SQL server is able to do... what a 10%, a 5% or whatever of what oracle can do.
Anyway who sayd this forgot to say that they worked with microsoft trying to improve SQL sever security features as well.
http://www.nextgenss.com/press-releases/ngs-and-the-sql-server-security-essential-guide/
They have a reason to say it. Who would say "I made a bad job!"
In my opinion there is no way yet to compare oracle to any other DBMS under any point of view.
Bye Alessandro

I am currently using the original macbook air and it is running 10.5.8 since it does not have anywhere to insert a disc how do I update it to anything that is more recent than that

I am currently using the original macbook air and it is running 10.5.8 since it does not have anywhere to insert a disc how do I update it to anything that is more recent than that

Keep in mind you can also use the optical drive of another computer to upgrade OS X. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2129 has information on how to do that. This works on a Windows PC as well as a Mac.

Automated convertion of AppleWorks files to more recent format?

Hi,
I had used AppleWorks extensively in the past and still have masses of documents in AW format (both the most recent one and the previous one). The bulk of those files are text with limited formatting, but some have a layout.
Is there a way to automatise the conversion of those documents to a more recent format such as Apple Page or Microsoft Word? Something using AppleScript maybe? I'm getting worried that if I keep those files in AW format there will soon come a time where I won't be able to read them anymore; already the AW5 files cannot be read by Page, meaning I'm dependant on AppleWorks 6 running in Rosetta to read them. Who said preserving documents in the digital era would be easy?
I'm a CS student, so solutions requiring a bit of programming are fine.

Hello
I made some changes so it would be easier to use it in a more complex script.
In AW6 Preferences > General > Files ,
uncheck three checkboxes:
Old Version Alert
[v6.0] Suffix
suffix .cwk
property zeDoc : "Macintosh HD:Users:yvankoenig:Desktop:téléphones5.cwk"
(* this is a sample, use your prefered protocol to define the file(s) to transfer. *)
property ZeFolder : ""
set ZeFolder to (path to desktop) as text
my saveAsPages(zeDoc)
on saveAsPages(docAW)
copy (read file docAW for 1) to signat
if signat < (ASCII character 6) then my saveAsAW6(docAW) (* was AW 5 or older *)
tell application "Finder"
copy docAW as alias to docAW_
copy docAW_'s {name, name extension} to {zeName, zeExt}
if zeExt is "" then
copy zeName to shortName
else
copy text 1 thru (-(2 + (zeExt's length))) of zeName to shortName
end if
end tell -- Finder
copy (ZeFolder & shortName & ".Pages") to destDoc
tell application "Pages"
open docAW_
save document 1 as Unicode text in file destDoc
end tell -- Pages
end saveAsPages
on saveAsAW6(docAW5)
tell application "AppleWorks 6"
activate
open file docAW5
copy name of document 1 to nomAW5
tell document 1
save nomAW5
end tell -- document
close document 1
(* docAW5 is now an AW6 document *)
end tell -- Appleworks
end saveAsAW6
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE samedi 27 mai 2006 14:04:05)

ORA-00338: log 2 of thread 1 is more recent than control file

We got this error in NSA (redo transport process) trace file last night. Everything looks fine now. Does anyone know what can be causing this error?
Thanks.

aDBA wrote:
We got this error in NSA (redo transport process) trace file last night. Everything looks fine now. Does anyone know what can be causing this error?
Thanks.always post your question with oracle version and operating system name and version.
refer:https://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2173829

How do I create a web site using already .doc files? More words than photo

I really want not to write everything on the iweb 08 format, but select, copy and edit my documents already written in .doc, or text, or ppt.
How do I do this? And, is it possible to edit them when they are in the iweb page?
Thanks,
María Cristina

You've posted this question in the iWeb 09 forum, but the same answer will work for both versions.
All you need to do is to choose which template type meets your needs and then copy/paste the text from your .doc or whatever document, into a text field on the page.
I would open the word documents with a text editor like Textwrangler so that all of the hidden Microsoft formatting data (font and paragraph info) is removed from the text. After pasting the text into the iWeb text box I'd change the font to one of the Web fonts for compatibility.
All of the text on an iWeb page remains editable for future changes.

Apple pro res 422 file consuming more space than usual

hi everyone!
I've been working with FCP 7 since 2008 and at the same time I started working with Canon T2 from 2 years ago and I haven't had any problems with my FCP workflow files, editing and output used to be H. 264 based files until I started to have problems with my hd DSRL projects. Recently when editing the audio went out of sync and I was suggested to change the Quicktime video settings from FCP 7 to imovie (which is th application I commonly use to create chapters and share to iDVD) this worked perfectly. It was the first time I which I had to change the Quictime Settings to Apple Pro Res 422 The Out of sync problem was resolved but the space consumed by the file was enourmosly ncreased instead. ie. A 5 min project usually would take like a 500 mbs quicktime file and now using the Apple Pro Res 422 this 5 min project went up to 5.3 Ggs!! And also the exporting process is taking forever!! For instance I'm working with a 30 min project and the Quicktime conversion never ends. It's taking about 12 hrs and is not taking more than the 20% of the process. Is there something I'm doing wrong? I need help in a extremely urgent way! Thank you all guys! And best regards from Mexico!!
Mac Pro early 2008
Processor 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Memory 10 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
Graphics ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256 MB
Software OS X 10.8.4 (12E55)

>using the Apple Pro Res 422 this 5 min project went up to 5.3 Ggs
That's about right for a ProRes 422 file. High quality video takes a lot of space. It's sufficient to use the lighter ProRes LT for the footage from your T2 by the way. Your MacPro can also have up to 4 hard drives for plenty of storage.
Why are you using QuickTime Conversion?
Exporting to QuickTime with current settings and self contained is the better way. Then you use Compressor to make your delivery format from that master. Compressor is faster because it can take advantage of multiple cores - FCP doesn't. It will also give you far more control and choice over the encoding.

HT204150 I dropped my iphone 4 in water and am using an older iPhone as backup. When I restored my contacts/calendar, etc. Only the calendar updated correctly. No notes transferred over and my contacts are from a year ago. How do I get my more recent c

I dropped my iPhone 4 in water and cannot get it to dry out enough to turn back on. I may have fried the battery. I am using an old iPhone 3 temporarily but cannot get all of my current info to sync. My calendar is up to date but none of my notes have transferred over and the contact list is from when I originally used the iPhone 3 last year. How do I get my iPhone 4 info synced onto the iPhone 3?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
You can't restore an iPhone 3G from an iPhone 4 backup. Until you get a replacement you can access your iCloud data at iCloud.com on a computer.

ORA-01110: ORA-01207: on sysaux01.dbf file

Hi,
I have a an Oracle 11.2 database running on SuSE Linux, and I did a cold linux backup of the database (shutdown database, and tar all file system to tape). Now I have restored all the files on a new server, and when I try to start the database, it brings the below error.
SQL> startup mount
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 1603411968 bytes
Fixed Size 2213776 bytes
Variable Size 872417392 bytes
Database Buffers 721420288 bytes
Redo Buffers 7360512 bytes
Database mounted.
SQL>
SQL> alter database open
2 /
alter database open
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01122: database file 2 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 2: '/data1/oradata/prod01/sysaux01.dbf'
ORA-01207: file is more recent than control file - old control file
When I do the restore, all the files have the same datestamp. But After the alter open database command, control01.dbf and system01.dbf files changed their timestamp to today.
Help.
Kevin

Oracle Error :: ORA-01207
file is more recent than control file - old control file
Cause
The control file change sequence number in the data file is greater than the number in the control file. This implies that the wrong control file is being used. Note that repeatedly causing this error can make it stop happening without correcting the real problem. Every attempt to open the database will advance the control file change sequence number until it is great enough.
Action
Use the current control file or do backup control file recovery to make the control file current. Be sure to follow all restrictions on doing a backup control file recovery.

Reinstall oracle with old control,data,parameter files

Hello,
I want to reinstall oracle, on a fresh server, but want to use old control,parameter and datafiles as i cold backup of these files, i mean os level backup, i want to know the procedure, thank in advance

See TIP 04: Duplicating a Database in 10g by Joel Pèrez

Necessary to "Update" old illustrator files?

I have tons of files created in old illustrator 6.0 and now that I have a newer version of illustrator, specifically CS2, loaded on Mac OS X it's calling all of my illustrator files "Text Files."
It says, "This file contains text that was created in a previous version of Illustrator. This legacy text must be updated before you can edit it." It asks you to either Choose Update or OK to update later.
Should I take the time to update all of these files now? I'm just archiving them. I have thousands of files and it would take time to open them all and update each one. If I don't update now though, will I be stuck later in years to come, with files that won't open at all, as operating systems progress, etc?
2) If I open a file, hit update and then hit save or save as, Logo A for instance will be renamed Logo A [Converted].ai - My question is should I just leave the brackets and the word converted or should I get rid of it?
3) Also, if I open a file, hit update and then hit save or save as it goes to "illustrator Options". In this dialog box it defaults to "Use Compression". Should I just leave it checked or deselect it? (I'm scared of the word "compression" as I just spent the last several days decompressing old Disk Doubler files using an OS 9 emulator. I was lucky to be able to do this.)
4) In this Illustrator Options dialog box it always gives me two warnings for these old files - The Document Raster Effects resolution is 72 ppi or less. What does this mean? Should I try and change it? If so, how? The other warning is "only fonts with appropriate permission bits will be embedded. What does this mean?
Please keep answers as simple as possible. Thanks so much.

Lala,
Most of this just boils down to personal preference and/or common sense.
I have tons of files created in old illustrator 6.0 and now that I have...CS2...Mac OS X [is] calling all of my illustrator files "Text Files."...Should I take the time to update all of these files now?
That's just a file-association issue on the OS, mostly for icon and doubleClicking-to-open. It doesn't mean you can't open the file in a later version of the creating program. Here's the main thing: Can you still directly open AI 6 files in the current version of AI (CS5)? If yes (as I suspect), then whether you update all these files before archiving them or not is just a question of what you consider most convenient. Do you prefer to have all your archive files already updated to current-version AI, or do you prefer to update them on an as-needed basis?
Personally, I opt for the as-needed route. I also have thousands of archive files. But I'm not going to open and resave them all (and mess with replacing legacy fonts, etc., etc.) with every new version of the host program. One could make a career of that. (And Illustrator is far from the only program I use.) In my case, the majority of those legacy files will never be needed again. Although I keep good backups, I always make it a point to make sure my clients know I am under no obligation to indefinitely archive my working files for their completed projects. (Anyone who takes on that liability, without being in that business and charging for it is flirting with disaster.) I provide the customer copies of what is necessary for the reproduction and uses he has contracted for, and he bears responsibility for redundant backup security of the files provided if he deems it necessary.
I'm just archiving them. I have thousands of files...will I be stuck later in years to come, with files that won't open at all...?
As long as the current version still supports the legacy format, it still boils down to whether you want to have all your archive files already updated or update them as-needed.
Now, eventually a new version of the host program may completely break backward file compatibility with a legacy format. That actually happened once in the history of FreeHand when a major modernization of the program was done. If a FH user at that time chose not to update their legacy files, then they would have to do a 2-step update, first using the latest version that did maintained the legacy compatibility, then to the current version. Even then, I did not convert all my archives (especially those for long-inactive accounts.)
The potential larger issue in that kind of scenario would be whether the "middle step" version of the host application will still run on the current-version OS. No one can predict that years and years in advance.
(Aside: For that matter, what assurance do we have that the next computer technology that everyone flocks to--say, organic computing with true artificial intelligence--will not break compatibilty with every existing PDF, CD, DVD, hard disk, VHS tape, Flash drive, Zip drive, Syquest disk, SCSI device, and AI file on the planet? On the other hand, I'm still able to use FH11 without a hitch on Windows Vista--haven't tried it yet on Windows 7. I'd love to try a copy of Windows FH 8--that was a clean drawing program--but only have a Mac version.)
It says "This file contains text that was created in a previous version of Illustrator. This legacy text must be updated..." It asks you to either Choose Update or OK to update later.
Fairly recently (much more recently than version 6), Illustrator's very archaic text objects were updated to a...well...less archaic structure. For backward compatibility, Adobe included a "conversion" routine to give you the option of updating the older text objects. Understand, you can still open, work with, and even re-save the file with the legancy text objects if you have need to. So again, do you really want to do this to all your archive files?(Understand, the reason for the warning in the first place is that the changes affect spacing and therefore potentially line wrapping, and other type-specific things; so if you are truly "updating" the file, i.e.; making it Johnny-on-the-spot, ready-to-go print-ready, you may have some re-typesetting to do. Do you really want to do that on all your legacy files right now?)
Logo A for instance will be renamed Logo A [Converted].ai ...should I just leave the brackets and the word converted...?
That's also just up to you. Makes no functional difference. Appending the word "converted" is intended as a mere file naming convenience. (FileMaker does the same thing by default, for example, when opening an Excel spreadsheet and thereby converting it to a FileMaker database.) For one thing, it lets you save the new file to the same directory as the original file without overwriting it. (In the FileMaker scenario, I always delete the "converted" because the .xls and .fp7 file extensions themselves are going to prevent accidental overwrites. In Illustrator, I never keep the multiple-version files anyway, so I also delete the "converted".)
... it goes to "illustrator Options"...defaults to "Use Compression". ...I'm scared of the word "compression"...
I'm not "afraid" of compression, but I never use application-specific file compression. It just creates other inconveniences in collaboration with others. For example, for many years Corel has provided the option of saving Draw files as compressed or not. It is a very common ocurrence for an AI user to receive a Draw file they should be able to open but can't, just because the Draw user forgot to not save it with compression (or didn't know better).
Yeah, Adobe's marketing might like to think I and everyone else in the world uses only its products, but the real world (thankfully) still isn't that close-minded.
The Document Raster Effects resolution is 72 ppi or less. What does this mean?
See online Help for what Document Rster Effects setting is all about. You need to understand it; but it doesn't really have anything significant to do with the question of updating legacy files. 72 ppi is the default, so if you update a legacy file from a version that predates raster effects, that's the setting the new document is going to get. But since there were no raster effects in the old file, it has no real bearing. But that setting is something you should be familiar with regarding any file you are sending to print, regardless of when.
The other warning is "only fonts with appropriate permission bits will be embedded. What does this mean?
You're getting this when converting legacy AI files? An EPS or PDF file may have embedded fonts, but (correct me if I'm wrong) not an AI6 file, unless the "Save with Acrobat compatibility" option was available in AI6.
At any rate, that's nothing new. Some programs can try to embed fonts in a file to facilitate remote printing and display (but not editing) without having to do the old-world "bundle for output" routine. If you happen to be the typeface designer, of course, you may not be too happy about that. So such features have had to provide the typeface foundry an opt-out. Some typeface vendors are almost as piracy-paranoid as Adobe--much to the dissatisfaction of their legitimate customers. So there is a setting in font files that the font creator can set to disallow embedding of the font. One example of particular distress to me is ITC Officina. Nowadays, I make a point to never purchase fonts that can't be embeded in a PDF. So ITC (or whomever actually owns the thing now) has at least one unhappy legitimately-licensed customer who has stopped using one of his favorite fonts and won't buy an updated version unless and until this nonsense is corrected. Again, it's really a non-issue re file version updating. You can't do anything (well, anything practical) about a font that doesn't allow embedding anyway. The warning is just a "reminder"; it's a standard alert whenever saving a file in a format that tries to embed fonts.
JET

Regard ora-01207: How Oracle judge file is more recent than control file - old control file

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for