Regardding Time Events confirmation.

Hi PP Gurus,
Could anybody please pour light on Time Event confirmation configuration for Work center and Customization? Whenever I'm trying to do Time Event confirmation for Processing finish event getting following error:
Message no. RU407: Pair formation: Conflict with previous confirmation
Diagnosis
A time event with the record type B40 should be created. When checking whether this is permitted based on time events that already exist a time event with the record type R10 was found as the predecessor.
The record type B40 cannot be a successor to the record type R10.
If anybody came across the same please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Abu Arbab

Hi,
The sequence can be the exactly in the same way as you have mentioned.
For Set-up time:
First select the Set-up Start radio button.
Now if you have Set-up Interruption then select the " Interrrupt Setup" Button.
If you want to start the set-up again then select the " Set-up Start" again.It will auto-confirm the interruption finish when you use the radio button "Start setup".
Finally you have to select the radio-button " Set-up Finished" so that Set-up time is completed.
Now the same-way for Process Time.
"Please come back with proficient comments". Hope I'am proficient enough with the reply.
Best Regards.

Similar Messages

  • Time Event Confirmation

    Hi.
    I am doing time event confirmations for certain operations.
    I have a break time defined in shift sequence as well as available cappacity.
    When confirmation is posted for start of processing and end of processing, this break time is automatically subtracted by system in posting  confirming / actual hours.
    Above break time is needed to be defined in work center so that it is considered during Scheduling of operation.
    now my client requirement is flexible time off during confirmation.
    in co19 dring time event confirmation, workers will take break by puasing the operation process start and interrupt option in
    time event confirmation  so this time will automatically subtracted from actual confirmation time as and when needed.
    in this case i want system to stop subtracting break time from actual confirmations.( is till need to define it in shift sequence so that it is considered in scheduling)
    let me know your comments.

    No Replies from forum

  • Standard not allow to edit value of activity type (Time event confirm CO19)

    All expert,
    I have requirement to customize program same as CO19 for confirmation time event by using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TE and now pogram can post record type B10 for start and B40 for finish processing. By the way I just have a little requirement for B40 to input calculation value in program at field ActyToConf1 to ActyToConf4 and Unit/activity1 to Unit/activity4 as parameters below. but program ignore all value that I input, only get result the value from standard
    Anyone advice me how I can do that?
    gt_timeevents-orderid = caufv-aufnr.
    gt_timeevents-operation = '0010'.
    gt_timeevents-recordtype = 'B40'. "Finish
    gt_timeevents-fin_conf = 'X'.
    gt_timeevents-logdate = wa_screen300-fisbd.
    gt_timeevents-logtime = wa_screen300-fisbz.
    gt_timeevents-yield = wa_screen300-yield.
    gt_timeevents-conf_acti_unit1 = 'MIN'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_activity1 = 10.
    gt_timeevents-target_acti1 = 'X'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_acti_unit2 = 'MIN'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_activity2 = 30.
    gt_timeevents-target_acti2 = 'X'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_acti_unit3 = 'UNI'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_activity3 = 60.
    gt_timeevents-target_acti3 = 'X'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_acti_unit4 = 'UNI'.
    gt_timeevents-conf_activity4 = 30.
    gt_timeevents-target_acti4 = 'X'.
    APPEND gt_timeevents. CLEAR gt_timeevents.
    Edited by: Konnapa on May 13, 2009 7:14 AM

    Rajesh,
    Put a breakpoint and try to debug the report step by step.
    You will findout the reason very easily.
    Whenever you have a select and are trying to append into an internal table, keep checking your internal table if it is been populated with the correct records.
    This way, you will findout the cause and can correct is accordingly.
    Thanks,
    Suresh Ganti

  • Differences between Time ticket (CO11N) and Time Event (CO19)

    Hi Guru
    Could you please briefly explain differences in between Time ticket (CO11N) and Time Event (CO19) during Prd Ord confirmation?
    I tried searching for relevant material but could not get any.
    Please advise

    Dear Lyonie,
    In my understanding CO11N, is generally used to confirm the production execution at operation level or sub operation level or
    normally for milestone operation confirmation.Automatic Goos movement can also be performed when this T Code is executed.
    There is no track of exact setup start time,end time,execution start time and end time.
    Using CO19,we can track the or post the exact or actual setup start time,setup end time,processing start time,end time for each
    operation.
    More related to Time Eevnt confirmation,
    Time Event Confirmations  
    Every confirmed time event is assigned internally to a record type group:
    Setup times are assigned to record type group 1.
    Processing times are assigned to record type group 2.
    Teardown times are assigned to record type group 3.
    Each record type group can be assigned to one or more parameters in the standard value key for the work center (for example machine time). (See Customizing in Production ® Basic data ®Work center ® General data ® Standard value ® Define standard value key). The link between time event and parameter ensures that the calculated duration counts as an activity (for example, when calculating the actual costs of the operation.
    The processing of an operation requires both machine time and labor time. The time event confirmation for the processing section of the operation can take effect on activity u2018machine timeu2019 and on u2018processing timeu2019, if you enter record type group u20182u2019 for the parameters u2018machineu2019 and u2018laboru2019 in the standard value key.
    You can only confirm quantities when you confirm processing time events.
    You can only confirm activities that cannot be assigned to a particular record type group (Set-up, processing, teardown) by using the time event u2018Variable activityu2019. The confirmed value is assigned to corresponding value in the standard value key parameters.
    Regards
    S Mangalraj

  • One issue regarding PPDS OP.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system

    Dear Experts
    we met a BAPI function issue regarding PPDS Operation.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system.
    scenario is as following:
    we want to build the interface between PPDS and non-SAP system, regarding OP. and order confirmation inbound processing.
    now we input simulated inbound date and test using BAPI: BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFOPRMULTI
    but we find a problem, even we set different value for fields ‘ duration’ in function. after call BAPI, It didn't reflect the 'net duration' or 'remaining duration', these fields not changed through check in Tcode:/SAPAPO/RRP3 for single operation.
    In the meanwhile , but it works for fields 'confirmed Yield' and fields 'confirmed Scrap' for single operation.
    my questions is that: if we need to synchronize the operation confirmation( including confirmed yield,confirmation scrap, duration)，do we use the correct BAPI for this or do we need an additional BAPI, please hints.
    Thanks a lot! any feedback would be welcome!
    Best Regards
    Kevin

    Hi Kevin,
    Yes you use the right BAPI.
    you have to use table OPERATION_CONFIRMATION.
    You cannot just set the duration. You have to trigger time event confirmations.
    The field duration according to the documentation currently not supported.
    You need to use CONFIRMATION_TYPE
    0100 Start of Setup
    0150 End of setup
    0200 Start of processing
    0300 Partially complete
    0350 Complete
    Not sure if all confirmation types are supported by the BAPI.
    You can also set start and end time but not sure either whether it is supported or not.
    Regards,
    Uli

  • Time event C019 integration with results recording

    Hi ,
          Posted this in the QM forum and got no response so reposting it here.  I am asking for a discrete manufacturing scenario. Does any one know how to integrate CO19 time event confirmation with the results recording transaction. Usually on the mfg floor the mfg people will do in process inspection. They are used to more of a clock in clock out way of working. They clock into the operation, they do the manufacturing activities and then they do the inspection activities. Once both are done they clock out and the material moves to the next operation. I knoe we can tie in manufacturing confirmation (CO11N) transaction with the results recording for inspection points. But I am looking to tie in the CO19  time event transaction to do the clock in clock out and tie it with the inspection point results recording transaction. The operators on the floor do not want to go to mutliple transactions to record thier time on that operation. Do you know how that can be done and if its even possible ?
    Also do we have to use inspection points or can we do it without inspection points ?.
    Thanks

    GS, Time events are always tied to a record group technically and this prohibits free/extended usage of the transaction compared to say CO11N.
        Explore further on the details provided in the sap help site which states,
    'You can only confirm quantities when you confirm processing time events.
    You can only confirm activities that cannot be assigned to a particular record type group (Set-up,processing, teardown) by using the time event ‘Variable activity’. The confirmed value is assigned to corresponding value in the standard value key parameters'..

  • Regarding ABAP dump during time ticket confirmation.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    I'm getting an ABAP dump while doing time ticket confirmation for a process order using COR6N. The dump is coming only for one plant and all the plants are working fine.
    The reason for dump is
    The current application program detected a situation which really should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).
    I tried to analyze the dump and got OSS# 385830. But this note only talking about the conversion of message from A to X type. What should be the reason (configuration/product error) behind that?
    If anybody came across the same, please comment on this
    Thanks & Regards,
    Abu Arbab

    Hi,
    Since this dump is happening only for a particular plant, compare the config set of this plant with the other plant which is working fine, you should be able to resolve it.
    Alternatively, ask your abaper to analyze the dump in ST22 & he / she should be able to let you know the exact reason why the dump is occurring.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • LIssue with time events upload through RPTEUP10

    Dear experts,
    I am using the standard report RPTEUP10 for uploading time events in IT 2011. It works fine but in the log, it just indicates the number of records read, posted, placed in the error pool ...
    Can we by any chance know the PERNRs for which the upload failed? The FM HR_CC1_TIMEEVENT_INSERT directly takes table of time events as parameter.
    Will I have to put this FM inside a loop and pass a each entry for each PERNR separately, so that I could catch the failed PERNRs? or is there any standard solution to this?
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Sumit Nene

    Hi,
    Actually we tried to upload the data manually through RPTEUP10 using txt file and also our client also want this for few locations.
    But we are unable to sort it out.
    I have gone through your document  and we adopted for automatic recording process as  my colleague confirmed it works excellent.
    But the problem is with manual uploading, the same is not showing in it 2011.
    any changes required in 2011 or 0050 before recording.
    it 0007, 1-1 is selected.
    please suggest some measure to achieve this.
    Regards,
    Sumana

  • Goods receipt is automatically created at the time of confirming the transf

    Hi,
    we are following the confirmation control key inbound delivery process.
    I am making an inbound delivery with refernce to the purchase order.
    then i am making a putaway against the inbound delivery through LT0F and creating a transfer order against the inbound delivery.
    Then i am confirming the transfer order through LT12, when i am confirming the transfer order the goods receipt is automatically created without manuallyy doing a PGR in inbound delivery.
    Can any one let meknow how to avoid the creation of the auto GR at the time of confirming the putaway TO
    Sunil

    Hi,
    In LT0F check in  the initial screen -->control data -->weather the adopt put away quantity field value is 4. If it is 4 then the GR will be posted automatically.
    Regards,
    Bharat.

  • Logical time in deleted time events - RPUAUD00

    Dear All,
    We are using standard report RPUAUD00 to read deleted time events (Infotype 2011) from system. In certain cases, deletion entries are displayed without any entry for field LTIME (Logical Time). Can any one throw some light, as of why and how this LTIME entry is not logged in change log?
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Kartik

    Dear All,
    We tried replicating this behaviour, but unable to. Any thoughts on this behaviour please..
    Regards,
    Kartik

  • To transfer time events from external time recording system to sap r/3

    hi all,
          I have a task to make an interface program between external time recording and sap r/3, and then to transfer the time events from that external system to sap system with the help of an rfc, i have got some information like the data first has to be transferred to the table CC1TEV and then from this table the data will be uploaded to 2011 infotype with the help of a standard program, but i am unable to find a solution for making the interface program and the RFC or BAPI which will transfer the records from external system.
        if anybody has any information on this plz help me out to solve this problem.

    Which recorgding terminals using to capture time events? They should have give some guidelines about this?
    Regards
    niranjan

  • Goods receipt at the time of confirmation

    Dear all,
    At the time of confirmation only i want to do goods receipt in the goods movement screen. So please suggest me the configuration setting by which i can do GR at the time of order confirmation.
    Thanks,
    Aravind.

    Hi,
    As others have mentioned, auto GR can be done in the below listed manner:
    1. Maintain control  key with auto GR. If you want only auto GR in last operation then create a new control key for which only auto GR is checked in SPRO T. Code: OP00
    2. If you want auto GR only for few order types then for the respective order type create a production scheduling profile and assign that order type in production scheduling profile and in work scheduling view of material master maintain this production scheduling profile with auto GR checked in SPRO t. Code: OPKP.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards,
    Alok Tiwari

  • Multiple entries in TEVEN for one time event created by HR-PDC

    Hi experts,
    we have a SAP certified time attendance system connected to our ERP 6.0 system by HR-PDC interface.
    Now it happens from time to time that exactly one time event causes multiple entries in SAP table TEVEN and therefore is shown in the check report PT40.
    The number of duplicate records is always different - up to about 140 entries for one and the same time event in the worst case.
    Except the field PDSNR all the other fields contain exactly the same values.
    I have checkt many of the problematic bookings and I have always just one correct time event in the source application and there is only one data record in the corresponding IDOC too.
    Also the number of transferred records shown in the protocol spool of the report SAPCDT45 is correct and identical to the number of records in the IDOC.
    The first place where I can identify the problem with the duplicate records is the table TEVEN.
    No records are left in the interface table CC1TEV.
    I have seen that within one block of identical time bookings in TEVEN the field PDSNR ist not numbered in one sequence but there are gaps in between that are used for any other entries.
    As I can see in historical entries of TEVEN the problem exists already for years so it does not seem to be in direct connection with the latest support pack or something like that.
    The relevant jobs run every 15 minutes whereby SAPCDT45 is started 5 minutes after RPTCC106.
    Has anyone else experienced this strange behaviour or knows what I could further investigate?
    Many thanks for your replies in advance and best regards
    Günter

    Hi Carlos,
    thanks for your fast reply.
    It seems that an entry for Status A00 or A05 would solve my problems and of course I will try to handle it by this view.
    But do you know whether there is any possibility to find out how it comes to these repeated postings?
    I do not know whether the repeated postings happen in the same package (IDOC) or in an earlier package and to be honest I do not think that the record comes from the source application a second time because there I could find only one record that seems to be correct.
    I also cannot understand how it comes that I have even 140 "identical" entries for one time event.
    Could you please let me know your thoughts about that?
    Anyway I thank you for offering a solution - even if I do not understand the reason for the pborlem.
    Thanks and best regards
    Günter

  • Formula at the time of confirmation

    hello anybody pls help,
    my client is asking formula at the time order confirmation for scrap qty. l am explining the scenario.
    i have created BOM for FG. In that i have maintaing RM, scrap and packing materials and i have two operations for this.
    i have created production order for FG with backflush. in this my scrap qty is not atcual qty. i have confirmed first operation and made goods issue more than the planned qty with movment type 261. then i am going to confirmed for second operation. here my client is asking formula before posting goods movement in CO11 t.code for scrap qty. it should be caluculate automatically from Issued RM qty to FG QTY (101 MVT) and RM return qty( 262 MVT). like
    scap qty = (RM1 qty +RM2 qty) - FG1 qty-FG2 qty - RM return qty.
    let me know is it possible.
    thanks & regards
    Bhakta

    Bhakta,
    Following are the list of Confirmation related  enhancements,
    Cust. specific enhancements when saving - CONFPP01
    Determine customer specific default values - CONFPP02
    Customer specific input checks 1 - CONFPP03
    Cust. specific check after op. selection - CONFPP04
    Customer specific input checks 2 - CONFPP05
    Customer specific enhancements when saving- CONFPP06
    Confirmations: Actual Data Transfer - CONFPP07
    Since I dont have the SAP access at this point of time, I will not be able to comment on which one can be usefull.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Upload time events using PA61?

    Hello friends,
    I have written code to upload time events using BDC for transaction PA61.
    But when i try to upload data,in the LIST ENTRY part there's a field ORIGF that is automatically getting filled with 'M" (indicating a manual entry).
    The requirement is that i need to change the content of ORIGF to SPACE.
    I tried updating table TEVEN but there's no change.
    Can anybody please suggest me as to whet i must do.
    Thanks in advance.
    Sanghamitra.

    Hello friends,
    Yeah thats right.
    Its always a good gesture to write down the way we solved.
    I faced problem in two areas :
    1) uploading more than three rows in the time events part of transaction PA61.
    2) updating ORIGF field of TEVEN.
    Solution:
    1) have set the a counter while looping through the time events and also set field DEFSIZE of CTUEVENTS.
    2) i observed the records getting uploaded in foreground mode so i could not notice the difference in the contenets of the field ORIGF but when i had done the same in background i could.
    I hope the reason is understood.
    Regards,
    Sanghamitra.
    2)

Maybe you are looking for