Regarding CIC0 transaction

Hi All,
My client requires following way:
Business Requires a streamlined access to transactions in R/3 from the Customer Interaction Centre in CRM.
Currently, Users have to carry out the following steps in order for the Selected Business Partner details to pre-populate in the R/3 transaction selected.
1.   Search for BP.
2.   Validate Search results
3.   Navigate to Business Data Tab
4.   Highlight the Sold-to Party returned from that search
5.   Use Menus to navigate to desired transaction
Now they wants from second option they directly wants to go 5th option means bypass 3 and 4, please let me know is there any include or exit which solves this problem.
Thanks & Regards
Naveen kumar

Hi Naveen!
Unfortunately I don't know any way of changing the behaviour of the cursor positioning.
What I still don't quite get is the reason for your client to have to position themselves on the actual object in the BDD. Are they using context menus? If that is the case why not introduce Action Boxes (with all your R/3 target transactions) instead?
As soon as they confirm the search all context-based actions are already using the correct BP for them, so however they browse to other transactions they will pass the correct BP-number as parameter.
If they are not interested in the Contact Person from the pop-up list, just hit enter twice during confirmation and only the relevant BP will be selected (into the BDD) and no CP. Then you of course have to hit enter a third time to confirm the BP into the BDD.
I also noticed that the active tab of the locator search result remains the same within one session, meaning that your users will only encounter this problem once during every session. If they do the triple-enter confirmation they will be in the right place immediately.
Maybe I am missing something here, but I think it sounds like you should be able to find a work process that is not too cumbersome for the users.
/F

Similar Messages

Not able to find 'Sales Summary' of a BP in CIC0 transaction

Hi,
We are using CRM 3.0 vesion and not able to find 'Sales Summary' of a BP in CIC0 transaction.
Appriciate any suggests on this.
Regards,
Fedor.

Hi ,
is it open so item or you already done the DO and Billing? , it wont allow to change if you have any sub.documents for that SO.
regards
Prabhu

Problem with CIC0 transaction OK codes

Hi Experts,
We are using CIC0 transaction in CRM 3.1 system. As you know there is a button "Reset all fields" ( the one with a crooked arrow sign ) which is used to reset all the fields before entering the next business partner. This button is not working consistently. In my system, I am getting an OK CODE of "%_GC 117 1" when I click this button. But, when the actual user ( who is in a geographically different location ) clicks this button, he gets an OK CODE of "CSEARCH_DELETE". As a reslut I am not able to provide some functionality the user asked for. I checked the SAP GUI version, Patch Level, OS Version, and IE version and settings. There is no difference in these between my PC and user's PC. What could be the problem ? Is it due to some problem with BSP ? Please advise.
Regards,
Sameej T.K.

OK CODE? Hmmmm... are you sure that BSP even in sight of transaction CICO, the one with the crooked behaviour? No ideas. This does not sound like BSP.
But if you feel like experimenting, check whether it is language dependent (EN vs DE). This is just wild shot over my shoulder as I exit stage right.

Regarding CJ02 transaction

Hi all,
I am facing a problem regarding CJ02 transaction.
The problem is when I am saving the classifications of the project it is not reflected back to the corresponding fields of respective table.
It would be very helpfull if anybody sahres his/her any idea regarding this.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Is it the field name or the field value which u have given? Did u add custom fields to this table?
Regards,
Vishwa.

Regarding CS03 transaction

Hi friends,
I have a simple query regarding the transaction CS03. When I give the Material Number, Plant and BOM Usage as input, I would get the list of components for this material.
Inside the transaction, is a CHECKBOX field ASM - this Indicates that the component for this material has its own BOM or has further components).
Could anyone tell me in which SAP table this information is stored i.e. an indicator to tell us if the component/material has further BOM or not.
I checked MAST and STPO tables but could not figure out the right field.
Awaiting your valuable inputs.
Thank You.
Regards,
Gayathri.

hi gayathri,
1.
the bom can exist for HALB or FERT .
u can dimnish the material not having a bom on this category .
i.e to say material type 'RAW' dosent hav a bom .
2.
like check out for table "MVKE" (Sales Data for Material) and in here check the fields
MVKE-MTPOS (Item category group from material master)MVKE-DWERK(Delivering Plant).
now giv the material and execute for initially dont giv a plant , and execute .
proceed with parent-matrial in bom and execute ,
u'll see the list of materials assigned in a particular sales area now check for MTPOS status this will have a category called LUMF ( this u will hav only for parent)
now say that the parent have 4 child materials (say)of which one has subassemblies so as u said it will hav a ASM check box ticked in CS03, now take this material and goto mvke and repeat the procedure and check the MTPOS status this will have item category like 'NORM'
remember for parent it was 'LUMF'
now for child(having subass;les) we got'NORM'
now check for same which dosent have a subassemblies from the child items it will be like 'ZATP' or 'XXXX' but not LUMF or NORM. to tell that it dosent hav further bom.
generalise the conclusion for all the materials(parent childorphans)if found okay apply this logic.
second alternative is ,
check the transaxction cs12.
give BOm material and observe that the first field(dglvl) ...
it indicates the level of that material in thta BOM.
exact indiaction is whether it has sub assemblies in that Material is the
field (BOMFL) If it has sub assemblies then it will be' X'.
see if u can make any hit in the tables using this relation above
regards,
vijay.

CIC0 transaction in CRM

How can I display transaction no in 'cic0' transaction on the screen ? I found no enhancements for this transaction.
Thanks in advance ,
Shekar.

Hi Shekar,
Go to T-code " crmc_cic_act0 " and change the Save Bus. Activity = Save Bus. Transaction on Req wrt to your Transaction Profile.
Hope this would fix your problem.
Thank you,
Jess

CIC0 Transaction

Hi All,
In CIC0 transaction in customer search tab , I need to change the 'Business partner 1' to customer . but this being a standard transaction i am clueless as to how i will change it . Cannot use the access key also.
please help.
Thanks,
Amit

Hi Amit
The BP Search tab is a HTML based screen. So any modification in the format or content of the screen, has to be done in the HTML template or in the program it uses in the search.
Goto Txn SMW0 - > Select the radio button HTML Templates for WebRFC Applications and Enter -> Need not enter anything in this screen , just execute.
You'll find all the templates here, select the one which you are using , by default it will be CIC_SEARCH_DISPLAY for the default search profile. Now that we cannot mess around with the standard stuff we make a copy of this template and then assign it to the search profile we are using in the SPRO . You can download the standard template onto your desktop make it a Z one and upload it back from SMW0 itself. You can make use of this one for your search.
Select your template in SMW0 and then select Change icon.
The html code is displayed in the notepad. Find the code
<TR><TH align=left style="font:bold" width=28%>
<!%%BP1%></TH></TR> and change it to
<TR><TH align=left style="font:bold" width=28%>
Customer</TH></TR>
If you want the above change to be done programatically, which is very simple provided you have the access key, in the program SAPLCRM_CIC_BP_SUB goto text elements and
change the text-020 . CRM_CIC_BP_SUB is the function group which the standard html template CIC_SEARCH_DISPLAY makes use of in implementing the search.
Ideally,I would suggest you to get the access key and do it programatically.
Hope this helps!
Ranjit

Doubt Regarding MIGO Transaction

Hi,
Where exactly the source code of MIGO transaction fills these two fields : BED , SED (Note: Under the Tab Excise Invoice).
Thanks & Regards,
Lakshmi.

ok

Doubt regarding SHDB transaction

Hi All,
            I have a doubt regarding the Process Tab in the application tool bar of SHDB transaction. What is the use of the following check boxes?
1)       Default Size
2)       Cont.after commit
3)      not a batch input session
4)      END: Not a Batch Input session
5)      Simulate Background mode

Hi,
Basically these are the properties for CALL TRANSACTION using. You need not worry about these unless you really need those.
1) Default Size: it will set the Default screen size for CALL TRANSACTION USING...
2) Cont.after commit : it will set indicator that CALL TRANSACTION USING... is not completed by COMMIT. after commit also the process will continue
3) not a batch input session: sets indicator that present session is not batch input
4) END: Not a Batch Input session
5) Simulate Background mode : session will be run in foreground. but similar to back grpund
you can see the documentation by placing the cursor on these and click f1.

Regarding FBL1N transaction

Hi All,
In transaction FK03 i am able to view full name of vendor but when i am going for transaction FBL1N for the same vwndor i am not able to see full name there, last few characters are missing there. Can you please tell me how can i increase the lenght of vendor name in FBL1N transaction?
Thanks.

Hello,
The output of the name is 'just' possible until the 35th character.
The reason is the following:
In the creation of the master data, the 'address' data is stored in
two different areas, first in the master data table (LFA1) and in the
specially created 'address information' tables.
Out of the technical design of the 'header setup' for the line item
display transactions, 'only' the LFA1 master data table is accessed.
As the field only contains 35 characters in this table LFA1, only these
will be displayed.
The restriction within some functions about the 'display' length of
the address information is also mentioned in a warning message you
receive, if you store a value which is 'bigger' then 35 characters:
The use of the last 5 characters in field NAME1 is restricted (40 of 40)
Message no. AM228
Diagnosis
The address data in field NAME1 exceeds the 35th position (40 of 40
characters occupied).
System Response
In this form the data can be saved and used up to the complete length
of 40 characters.
In some scenarios, the system only uses the first 35 characters of name
fields.
REgards,
REnan

Regarding XK02 transaction in SAP ECC 6.0 Version

Hi All,
I am working with an object which calls a transaction <b>XK02</b> to modify the name and contact details fields in Version <b>SAP ECC 6.0</b>.
The problem is that, when the transaction is run manually and saved or when an SHDB Recording is created, the data is getting updated.
But when the transaction is called from a program or when the SHDB Recording which is already created is run, the data is not getting updated in Version SAP ECC 6.0.
The data is getting updated properly when it is done in Version SAP 4.6b.
Central Address Management System is used here.
Can anybody please help me in this regard?
Thanks & Regards,
Vaitheeswaran.

Hi Prabhu,
The call transaction statement is running smoothly. The SY-SUBRC is 0 for this.
The thing is, there is a Check Box at the end of the screen called 'Use Central Address Management' when the SHDB is created.
If this is checked, the contact details are stored in ADRC and LFA1 tables and only in LFA1 if not checked.
In the new version SAP ECC 6.0, the data should also get populated in the ADRC table.
There is a slight change in the logic in SAP ECC 6.0 version.
Thanks & Regards,
Vaitheeswaran.

Regarding F110 Transaction - Check printing

Hi All,
I switch on debuggin for the form of check printing and set a break point in the print program. then when i am going thru the process using F110 tanasaction by providing the variant and other details exactly, then it is not stopping in the form or in the print program, directly it is creating the spool request.
kindly help me how to debug the check printing form and print program using F110 transaction
Regards,
Prasad

Hi Jilan,
After activating the debugger in the form and putting break-point in the print program restart the transaction F110.It will stop there.
If even then it is not getting stopped there then check in the Transaction NACE which form and Print program is configured with the output type of your application.
OR Go to SE37 transaction display the FM 'OPEN_FORM'.
put the break-point at the line
check co_perform-active <> true.
Restart the transaction F110.Check the value of 'FORM' in debugging mode that will be the form configured to your transaction.
Regards,
Mukesh KUmar
Message was edited by: mukesh kumar

Billing quantity data in CIC0 transaction

HI Gurus,
I would like to know how the billing data is stored in CIC0.
When I searched previous threads, I came to know that
Billing data is stored in CRMD_BILLING table and header
data in CRMD_ORDERADM_H table.
But when i checked my system, i didnt got any
CRMD_BILLING table.I got the header data table.
I would like to know that for a given business partner
and posting date, How the billing quantity is calculated?
Points will be rewarded to helpful answers
Regards,
Senoy

check
CRMD_BILLING table....
i can c same table in my system..
check once again
Regards
Anbu

Need Information regarding JTA Transactions

Hi all,
I have written session beans with out transaction.But now i want to apply JTA Transactions to that session bean methods.Can you pls send some code,Examples and related links regarding this.
Regards,
Kiran

Hi Kiran,
But it was discussed so many times, check:
Problems while providing Transaction for a method in EJB
Problems while giving a transaction attribute to a Method in EJB
EJB transaction concurrency issue
Best regards, Maksim Rashchynski.

Regarding New transaction in BPM's

Hi Everyone,
1.Are there any Prerequisites for defining BPM's?
2. In the Block Step Type,we have option as New Transaction. Can anyone tell me the use of this. please site some examples.
3. In some step Types like Send, Transformation, Receiver Determination, We have an option with Check Box as Create New Transaction. Is it the same function as in Block step New Transaction when do we use this option.
4. How to check the errors in BPM.
5. What are the different Error codes in BPMs.
I have found some information in SAP Help as well, please provide with some suitable Examples so that It would be much easy to Understand .
Thanks & Regards,
Varun

Hi
Create New Transaction
Create New Transaction in Block step, is used mainly for Error monitoring. If any error then can restart block. use below thread.
New transactions in BPM
To monitor BPM process use this guide
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/troubleshooting%252bintegration%252bprocess
Various Error TCode
SXMB_MONI_BPE -> To monitor Integration Process.
SWWL->To Know open BPM Instances

Regarding CIC0 transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for