Regarding GR COnfirmation

Dear All,
DC make an Outbound Delivery for store against an STO and store do the GRN.
Is there any way of doing GR Confirmation to DC?
Awaiting Responses
Thnx in advnc
viks

Dear Viks,
You have created a purchase order with delivery date 01/10/2007
Quantity as 100.
Expected delivery date and quantity required you have mentioned in PO
The vendor will confirm that he has received you order, is supplying the material and will send you the confirmed quanity and confirmed date by which the material will be supplied.
Suppose he can only supply 80 units and only on 10/10/2007.
When you get the confirmation, you go to T.Code ME21N (U - STOand update that information in the confirmation tab in item details.
With regards,
B.Ravindranath

Similar Messages

Regarding order confirmation

Hello SD Gurus,
I am facing a problem my customer is creating the sales order but the order confirmation is going to different customers.
Is there any possibility to control the order confirmation in the standard SAP.
Regards,
Kishore reddy

Hi,
If the confirmation is going through Idoc then you need to check partner profile settings in WE20 transaction.
Regards,
Chandra

Regarding activity confirmation against order

Hi all,
I am confirming production order.
Case1 - Confimration using CO11N where I put actual activity quantity in the blank activity
Case 2 - Confirmation using CO15
I dont see any activity confirmation in AFRU in 2nd case. I think system is not proposing and carrying out the activity confirmations.
Help me in this case.
Regards,
Yogesh

Dear Yogesh,
1) Yes, if you go with order level confirmation then you cannot change activity timings
what ever defined in routing same will picked while confirmation
2) where as if you go with CO11N, then you can change you activity timings
This is Std SAP
Regards
Madhu

Regarding new confirmation profile

Dear Experts,
have created new confirmation profile(SAP001) through OPK0 and created all detail areas as required.but now i am facing following problems.
1. I am not getting the message "Activities are recalculated due to quantity change (please note)" when i change
Yield to conf quantity.
2. Activities like POWER ext. are not reinitilizing as per Yield to conf quantity.
Earlier it was working..
Thanks&Regards
rvyas

Dear,
Go to OPK4 tab operation indiv entry make sure that qty and service all tick to be marked make sure that if the quty is changed the actvities are also changed. And in OPK0 select your profile and go to detail in Default tab select the option immediate proposal for quants and services.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Regarding shift Confirmation as Mandatory Fielsd in Co11n in ECC 6.0

Hi SAP Gurus,
Right now i am working in ECC 6.0, and have activated shift with the helps EHP 3.0. Now my problems .
1. I wants the that shift field should be compulsory, I have looked in co86 but unable to do so
In co86(fielsd selectiuon tables) Ths shift field is not there (COCF_SHIFT_DISP), I tries with ABAP, but till now unable to do so .Please helps me to come out of the problems
Thx
Bhupendra Singh
09178253155

Dear,
You can do this with transaction variant through SHD0 for CO11N. In SHD0. tick the Field required then it become mandatory.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

URGENT REGARDING ORDER CONFIRMATION

my client requirement is he wants the material nmber in the order to be in display mode so that the end user cannot change it.please dont tell me as to write some routines and maintain CMIR.
guaranteed rewards

Hi,
Simply use userexit save document prepare in MV45AFZZ USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE.
Here you can write the code as check the entries in VBAP table for the material and if the current entry does not match with VBAP MATNR then show error as you can not enter a differnt material,so that user will not able to change the material.
This user exit comes into picture just while savng the document.
Other option is you can use field exit fort this application.(RSMODPRF)
In this write code to irst check Tcode,it should work only in casee of VA02.
Then check VBAP MATNR with XVBAP MATNR.If they are not same show error
Reward points if useful
Regards,
Amrish Purohit

Confirmation of a production order

Hello,
I have a question regarding the confirmation of a production order.
Is it possible to confirm part of a production order into a temporary special stock in 4.6b? The reason is that we have to perform inspection before posting it into final unrestricted stock. The confirmation into the 'temporary' stock should not book any values of the stock. The value should be booked after the inspection.
Looking forward to your feedback!!

Hi,
If you have QM module implemented, maintain inspection type 04 in material master & upon posting GR for the production order an inspection lot will be created. You can then do a results recording & a usage decision on the inspection lot. If it passes the QC it will be posted to unrestricted stock.
If you do not have QM module then alternatively create a SLoc which is not included for MRP & specify this SLoc in your order header & when you do GR it will be posted to this SLoc. You can then a SLoc to SLoc transfer. Or if you dont want to create a SLoc, check in MIGO while posting GR for this order if you can specify that it is to be treated as a QC stock.
Regards,
Vivek

Network confirmation cancell. thru CN29,when past posting period isnot open

Hi Gurus,
I have one query regarding netowrk confirmation. In our scnario, we are confirming network activity/element directly through CN27. Now after confirmation, due to some mistake we are trying to cancel that confimration through CN29 but system gives me error that "posting period is not open". As my network confirmation was done in the month of March'10 and i am trying to cancel it in April'10 that's why system is not allowing me to canel the confimration.
Now my query is that how to cancel the network confimmation without opening past posting period. I looked into the configuration for network confirmations but there is no setting available to allow cacellation of network confirmation done in posting period which is not open now.
however in CAT5, we have a option where we can enter cancellation posting date, and system allows to cancel time postring for that period also which is closed now (by putting cancellation posting date belonging to current posting period wihhc is open).
regards
Alok Mittal

I have not verified the same on system, but It's quite good observation. I think it's standard behavior in system and could be possible, in CN29 you are not having option to put posting date, so, system is taking date of posting date on which it got posted for reversal. i.e. March 10, but period is closed for that date. so, system is giving you error that period is closed.
Now coming to CAT5 if you give posting date of March 10, and try to reverse this document system will give you same error of period close. but if you give posting date of period April 10 system will allow to post. Because current period is open. Reversal program works in SAP based on some logic for different documents.
If you wanted to check why system is behaving in that way in that case, compare both documents ( original posted and reversal document posted in CAT5, check after posting reversal document is there any change done by system to original documents , I understand mostly system put reversal tick mark or so, in original document and give reference document in new documents )
Please check and revert back.
With Regards
Nitin p.

Line item issue in order confirmation

Hi folks..!!!
i have an issue regarding order confirmation. while i am trying to display a sale order that line item quantity and somo more data's are printing in second line. i need those data's has to be print in same line in line i.e item , material and material description displaying row...
while in layout they done for item, material , material desc are in one TEXT element i.e ITEM_LINE and Quantity and some more fields are in other TEXT element i.e ITEM_LINE_PRICE_QUANTITY, i think becoz of this quantity is display in second line.. could you plz solve this issue..
ITEM     MATERIAL     QTY      DESCRIPTION   PRICE....
10           ABC                           DEMO
                                10PC                                 2113
i need output like this...
ITEM     MATERIAL     QTY      DESCRIPTION   PRICE....
10           ABC             10PC          DEMO         2133

hi ,
u r using script or form ?
if u r using script ...
in tag column put "=" ... so it will cont with the prev line...
in case u r using smartforms ... keep all the values in single text element ...
is there any problem in putting them in single column ?

Goods Confirmation in SRM 7.0: requester, recipient, in behalf of

Hi GURUS,
I tried to find out in the others threads, but I still have dubts regarding Goods Confirmation creator.
We are working on SRM 7.0 SP3, with basic employee.
In the previous release of SRM when an employee went to Goods and Services Confirmation could decided the role in the document: Receiver or Requester. (Today we can search the Goods Confirmation ALREADY created with this kind of roles, but doesn't help in the creation).
Now in SRM 7.0 we have in the "Create Confirmation" iView the following text / fields:
To create a confirmation, you need to select a purchase order as a reference
Proceed as follows: search for the required purchase order, then select it from the search results below
Purchase Order Number:
Item Description:
Timeframe:
Product ID:
Shopping Cart Number:
Shopping Cart Name:
That is not enough.
Moreover if an employee creates a Shopping Cart in behalf of someone (we give the professional iView to the employees), this other user doesn't have the opportunity to create a Goods Confirmation in the POWL of the Shopping Carts.
So: did SAP forget some functionalities?
We are working on the Classic Scenario and the list of the Purchase Order ready for the Goods Receipt is horrible.
Did you have the same problem?
Do you know a way or manual workflow to have the old funcitonality?
Thanks!
BRs,
Maria

Hi Raj,
The requester attribute is used for Shop on Behalf functionality. This makes creating shoppingcarts and confirmations available for employees. Therefore i believe that the configuration of this attribute in your central recipient scenario is obsolete.
I think that you havn't configured the SYS attribute in your organizational schema. This attribute tells the system where to look for your inv/confirmation documents. Include all systems here, in your case: Add your local SAP SRM logical system name. This should resolve your problems.
Ps. Also try giving a (couple) of parameters when searching for your PO document from the central recipient transaction, this helps (speed up) searching for a reference document.
Kind regards,
Tim
Edited by: T. Schuffelen on Jul 14, 2010 12:29 PM

Can we get PO confirmation message in MD04?

Hi All,
i have got a requirement from my customer. please help me know how it can be done in SAP.
Customer wants that once buyer gets a confirmation regarding a delivery & it is updated in the confirmation Tab at PO level, then after MRP run system should give a message in MD04 that this PO is confirmed.
could you please let me know if we can do it in SAP & how?
any help on this will be highly appreciated.
regards,
anubhab

FOr confirmed PO's MD04 shows a differrent MRP element ShpgNt ( Notification) & that can be easily seen by all buyers/ MRP controllers.
Also you will need to try to setup email to MRP controller under activate workflow for mail to MRP controller
Hope this helps. Good Luck
Thanks,
Ram

SCRAP DURING CO11N CONFIRMATION

Dear All,
I am facing client sensitive problem regarding scrap confirmation at CO11N.
As I am having Production Order of 5 qty & having 3 Operation.
Now I have confirmed the first Operation with 5 qty as Yield.
for second operation I confirmed 3 qty yield & 2 as scrap.
for third operation system is allows me to confirmed the 5 qty as a yield.That's should not be allowed logically & practically as well.
& system is allowing to confirmed any no of qty of scrap.i.e more than Production order qty.
Please give your valuble suggesting to clear this issue.
& exact terminology behind the scrap confirmation.
I have already maintained error for overdelivery & underdelivery tolerance in confirmation parameter,
similarly i have not maintained any percentage scrap in BOM & Material master Your immediate reply is highly appreciated
Thanks & Regards,
vidyasagar diwate

I checked and found that system is not allowing me enter the any no of qty for scrap for the second operations.
here i confirmed 80 as yield and 20 as scarp in first operation...here this will allow me to enter any no of qty of scrap as this is first operation and will give the warning message for exceeding over delivery (this depends again confirmation settings).
During second operation i confirmed 80 as yield and again 30 as scrap...here i got the error message saying 80 is only allowed.
regards
Tajuddin

Confirmations after SRM Server update to level 9

We are having an issue with regards to Confirmation of goods, we have a po of 300 units and we have confirmed 85 but this has failed there is no figures in the confirmed Qty nor is there a value.
Any ideas?

We resolced this by checking the PORT in EDI (WE21) rfc connections where incorrect

WM: Pick HU (=SU) during TO confirmation

Hello,
I have a question regarding TO confirmation.
The requirement is to allow the fork lift driver to pick any HU(=SU) in the storage bin during TO confirmation.
The storage BINs have put away strategy Bulk Storage. The system is Full WM u2013 HU managed.
I am simulating the process with the LT03 transaction. When creating the TO in foreground:
a) Source SU is empty u2013 which is OK u2013 fork lift driver will choose which SU to pick.
b) Destination SU has only zeroes: 00000000000000000000.
When I create such TO the system gives me an error via sap mail notification: u201CExpress document "Update was terminated"u201D
Error info: SU 00000000000000000000. Already exists.
Solution:
I created a new HU through HU01 and then gave this new (letu2019s say dummy) HU as Destination SU in the process of TO creation.
Now the fork lift driver can choose the real pick HU during TO confirmation. The dummy HU is replaced by the real HU.
My question is:
Is there a solution that the system would automatically generate this dummy HU as destination SU instead of the 00000000000000000000. Or could the destination SU field be empty somehow?
Please help.
Thank you very much in advance

Thank you again for your effort.
As far as i can see in my settings - The SU-managed Bulk Storage is active for the storage type.
But still i have to generate a dummy HU with HU01, which i then use in LT03 as destination SU when creating the TO.
The system doesn't allow the destination SU to be emtpy or all zeroes.
Once again:
The process works, but my question is if i can get rid of the step where i manually have to create a dummy HU which is then replaced with the real HU in the process confirming the TO ( picking in the BIN).
Thank you in advance for any new hints.

Confirm TO Query (ref:L_TO_CONFIRM)

HI Everyone,
I have a query regarding TO confirmation that I'd appreciate some advice on. I implemented a custom RF transaction to confirm TO for putaway using the function module L_TO_CONFIRM. To my mind it's working as it should but my client has reported what they think is an error. Bascially when the TO is created from the goods receipt it's creating entries as follows . e.g
Material Batch   QTY
1234      ABC     1
1234      ABC    1
Now when the client uses the RF transasction they scan in the details for material batch and quantiy and perform the confirm action. In the example above they enter Quantity as 2 so they expect both lines above to be confirmed. Currently it just confirms one of these lines. My question is this:
Why have two different lines on the TO/GR with the same material and batch instead of just one line with a quantity two ?
and
Can the function module L_TO_CONFIRM handle the above scenario ?
Any help or advise is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your time
DK

More or less what J put. Presumably you've got two TO items as there are two destination bins. On that basis confirming a quantity of 2 is incorrect if that is against a single TO item. In fact you should probably have some form of feedback given to the operator to that effect i.e. an 'error' or 'warning' sound and msg as quantity input does not match quantity expected, for your custom RF tx.
You've got two issues:
1. Understand why quantity split over two items and possibly correct settings
2. Consider how to present the information to the operator so the operator understands the expected quantity and is alerted to entry of a quantity that doesn't match.

Regarding GR COnfirmation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for