Regarding Liquidity Planner Customization (Configuration) ?

Hello ,
    Every one
        Currently i am searchiing basic neccessary Liquidity Planner Customization to be do . My question is could any body tel me the way how should i get the names of all necessary Liquidity Planner Customization ?
        If any body has list of it could you tel me the names ?
Thank you
Deepak Pawar

The best thing you could do is read the configuration guide for [FSCM-CM|http://help.sap.com/bp_bl603/BBLibrary/HTML/160_ES_VE.htm].
Hope it helps!

Similar Messages

Liquidity Planner - Liquidity Item Re-assignment

Hello Experts
My question is regarding Liquidity Planner.
We have offsetting items being allocated to Liquidity Item IN-TFR-000(unallocated payments).
For example clearing document 10018475 line item 1 reports +4375.00 for Liquidity item IN-TFR-000. The same clearing document 10018475 Line 2 will post -4375.00 for Liquidity item In-TFR-000.
Both items are reported on the FLQ Line Items report.
We need to exclude these items which have the same document number/ with zero totals from the Line items report. Note that liquidity item IN-TFR-000 also has other unallocated items to be reported.
Can I re-assign these items to another liquidity item (e.g OT-OUT-999) via a program or user exit? I can only do this after the liquidity item has been assigned through FLQAB/ FLQAC/FLQAD.
Also where to configure the user exit? Or do I use a program to call the manual assignment transaction FLQAM?
Thanks in advance!

Hi ,
It is possible to transfer the amount from one liquidity item to another liquidity item by using the transaction code FLQT1 .

Liquidity planner customer / vendor / gl account based query

Hi gurus ;
My client want to see cash flows at customer , vendor and gl account base. Are there any way to classify query results for customer , vendor and gl accounts.
Thanks ;
Koray

Hi,
As a standard solution, you need to define Planning Group in such a way which will give direct difference to Vendor/Customer records. As a result the CM settings can also be configured seperately for different Planning Groups.
Liquidity Planner will show the balance in drill down layout with different Planning Group also.
Regards
prasad

Liquidity Planner and New General Ledger

Dear all
We are in the process of implementing Liquidity Planner and would like any informaiton related to this which may be of help, particularly related to intergration with New General Ledger and providing cash flow statements for segments and profit centres.
Many thanks
PRG

Dear Bernd,
Document Splitting:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_glossary/en/35/88d1bbd1952050e10000009b38f982/content.htm
An automatic procedure for organizing line items in the document according to selected dimensions (such as organizing receivable lines by profit center). Moreover, you can effect a zero balance setting for selected dimensions (such as profit center or segment). The zero balance setting causes additional clearing lines to be generated on clearing accounts in the document after the document has been created.
For example, the document splitting procedure is necessary for drawing up financial statements for the selected dimensions.
Document Split Account:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_glossary/en/35/26c626afab52b9e10000009b38f974/content.htm
A special account that must be created in financial accounting for posting payroll results to accounting. The partial totals for all documents in a posting run are posted to this account.
Document Splitting Characteristics:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_glossary/en/10/046cfff732584989de50edd6fdc1e3/content.htm
Account assignment object for which document splitting can be performed.
This characteristic generally corresponds to a field in the data structure of the general ledger.
Examples of document splitting characteristics:
Profit center
Segment
Business area
Customer field
Other characteristics (characteristics that are relevant for application components that receive documents from General Ledger Accounting, such as Controlling).
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

Item not assign in standard liquidity planner

Hello to you all.
I am using liquidity planner in the standard way without any developing.
Once I used Tcode FLQQD7 - Test Query to check my setting of the Assignment from Invoices, the document was assign to the correct item.
Once I used Tcode FLQAD - From Invoices to actual assign it, I was surprised that the system couldn't find the document at all.
I will appreciate your advise.
Amir

probably this Document is not present in LP tables(FLQITEM*) as it does not have an actual account Line.
So FLQAD doesnot capture this Document.
Let me explain with an example how the assignment program FLQAC and FLQQC7 works,
Assume Liquidity item for Info be assigned through query as Q1.
Doc1
Actual account : 100
Info account : 100-
Now when you run FLQQC7 for this Doc,then you will notice 2 Lines for same Doc with no Liquidity item for the Line item with actual account and Liquidity item Q1 being assigned for the Line item with info account.FLQQC7 just projects the LI assigned for the account in the Doc.
Now when you run FLQAC for the same Doc,then the amount 100 will be assigned to the Liquidity item Q1.You will notice only 1 Line. This implies that the amount from actual account is ASSIGNED to the LI Q1.
Now if have cleared the Info line in Doc1 with another Doc,for eg, Doc2,
Info account :100
Info account1:100-
Then FLQAC will have assigned the amount 100 to LI for the info account1.
This implies that the amount from actual account is assigned the info account1.
And you should use the FLQQC7 to info account1 and check it is the same LI as FLQAC and not for the info account1 in Doc1. This is how FLQQC7 should be used.
But in your case you have marked the gl accounts as actual and also as Info through query.
When you run FLQQC7 and FLQAC for the Doc with such accounts, for Eg:
Actual1 : 100
Acutal2 : 100-
This Doc is just a Bank transfer Doc. So when you run FLQAC for such Docs,you will notice the amounts assigned to transfer LI assigned in FLQC2.
But when you FLQQC7(Note that both the Docs are assigned a LI in query), you will notice that the LI assigned in query is assigned to those accounts in Query.
To test query assignment is working correctly,I would suggest you to post a Doc as the First example.
And assign LI through query for the Info account only.Then RUN FLQQC7 for the info account in the Doc.
Then Run FLQAC for the same Doc.The assignment program should also have assigned the same LI as in FLQQC7.
If so then query assignment is working fine.
Also I would suggest you to read the note 412605 on how the Liquidity planner should be used.
Kind Regards
davide

Liquidity Planner (queries)

Hi,
I am working in a roll out of liquidity Planner (liquidity calculation). There is already a company in the country which is the one that I have to take as a reference. My question is about queries (TS FLQCC1 and FLQQD1); I can see that the reference company has the queries which I need already created (they are created for the company and not global for the country). I am thinking of changing these queries as global for country (without an specific company) and then assign them to an specific secuency query for the company (TS FLQQC5 and FLQQD5).
My question is if these changes can generate any problem for the document chains and if the perfomance could be worse?
In addition I want to ask which is better or more usually: to define queries for a company or global for a country?
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi Cecilia,
I would like to clarify certain things though i am not an expert in Liquidity Planner.
By reference company, do you mean that you want the functionality like them or something else? I do not know for the country though, but liquidity forecast for the treasurers should be interestd only for their company. And country , even if it is possible, should be mich more performance intensive.
Please correct me if i interpreted the question erroneously.
Best regards!
Sandip

What is difference between customization & configuration

what is difference between customization & configuration ???

Hi Sahu,
The difference between cutomizing and configuration is:
CONFIGURATION: we will configure the system to meet the needs of your business by using the existing data.
CUSTOMIZING: we will customise or adapt the system to your business requirements, which is the process of mapping SAP to your business process.
Also, When considering enterprise software of any type, it is important to understand the difference between configuration and customization. The crux of the difference is complexity.
Configuration uses the inherent flexibility of the enterprise software to add fields, change field names,modify drop-down lists, or add buttons. Configurations are made using powerful built-in tool sets.
Customization involves code changes to create functionality that is not available through configuration. Customization can be costly and can complicate future upgrades to the software because the code changes may not easily migrate to the new version.Wherever possible, governments should avoid customization by using configuration to meet their goals.Governments also should understand their vendor's particular terminology with regard to this issue since words like "modifications" or "extensions" often mean different things to different vendors.
Regards
Sasikanth.Ch

Difference between customization & configuration

What is the difference between customization & configuration?

The difference between cutomizing and configuration is:
CONFIGURATION: we will configure the system to meet the needs of your business by using the existing data.
CUSTOMIZING: we will customise or adapt the system to your business requirements, which is the process of mapping SAP to your business process.
Also, When considering enterprise software of any type, it is important to understand the difference between configuration and customization. The crux of the difference is complexity.
Configuration uses the inherent flexibility of the enterprise software to add fields, change field names,modify drop-down lists, or add buttons. Configurations are made using powerful built-in tool sets.
Customization involves code changes to create functionality that is not available through configuration. Customization can be costly and can complicate future upgrades to the software because the code changes may not easily migrate to the new version.Wherever possible, governments should avoid customization by using configuration to meet their goals.Governments also should understand their vendor's particular terminology with regard to this issue since words like "modifications" or "extensions" often mean different things to different vendors.
Regards,
Gauravjit
Reward Points if the answer is helpful.

Liquidity Planner- Redetermine Liquidity Items

Hi,
I have created my bank sub-accounts as Actual Accounts. I had missed creating a few accounts ( bank sub- accounts ) to be assigned as actual accounts. After a few entries had been posted I realised that these accounts had been missed and then created them as actual accounts.
I have now run Transaction FLQAC and have found that for the documents that were posted before I have maintained the Actual Accounts,the system has not derived the Liquidity items .
For example an entry has been made from the Main Bank Account to Bank -Sub Account.
As the Actual account was not maintained for the Sub- Account at the time of initial posting.,the system has now an entry with INIT_TRANS, when I run FLQAC.
Is there a way I can rectify this and ensure that INIT_TRANS becomes Zero ?
Thanks and Regards.

You need to use t.code FLQC10 to pull missed documents to liquidity planner and then run FLQAC/FLQAD.

Liquidity Planner - Forecast Programs

Hi,
We are implementing the Liquidity Planner SAP module, and we need to use some forecast programs for loans and others treasury transactions.
Does anyone have documentation regarding to the following forecast programs?
RFLQ_CASH_FORECAST_TRC1
RFLQ_CASH_FORECAST_TRD1
RFLQ_CASH_FORECAST_TRT1
We have already implemented them, however we need to create queries type T - From Treasury Deal, in order to derive correctly the liquidity items. Wich is the transaction that we have to use?
Thanks in advance.
Regards

Hi Ana.
I am facing the same problem. I cannot find a way to maintain a query which is origin T. I tried to run SAPMFLQQRMAINT program, but I am getting an error (FQL037) when I try to fill the "Origin" field with "T".
Have you found a way to make it work properly?
Kind Regards,
Paulo.

Liquidity planner

Hi All,
I have question regarding liquidity forecast report,
when I double click on my PAYABLE group, I have sub group such as :
- TRADE,
- SPECIAL GL
- DP REQUEST
When I double click on the trade group, I see nothing .. no data at all. this is only happen to my AP trade group.
Nothing's wrong with the special GL / DP request. Also no problem with AR side.
Anyone ever face the same problem as mine here ??
Could anyone suggest me, what I might done wrong
Thanks,
-M-

no longer needed

Query regarding the Node manager configuration(WLS and OAM Managed server)

Query regarding the Node manager configuration(WLS and OAM Managed server):
1) In the nodemanager.properties I have added the ListenAddress:myMachineName and ListenPort: 5556
My setup : One physical Linux machine(myMachineName) has : WLS admin server, managed server(OAM 11G) and nodemanager.No clustered environment.
2) nodemanager.log has the following exception when I start the oam_server1 using EM(Enterprise Manager11g):
Mar 23 2012 1:39:55 AM> <SEVERE> <Fatal error in node manager server>
java.net.BindException: Address already in use
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method)
at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.bind(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:336)
at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:336)
at javax.net.ssl.impl.SSLServerSocketImpl.bind(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.<init>(ServerSocket.java:202)
at javax.net.ssl.SSLServerSocket.<init>(SSLServerSocket.java:125)
at javax.net.ssl.impl.SSLServerSocketImpl.<init>(Unknown Source)
at javax.net.ssl.impl.SSLServerSocketFactoryImpl.createServerSocket(Unknown Source)
Default port on which node manager listen for requests is localhost:5556.I have changed it to point to my machine. The port should be of WLS admin server or it should be the managed server port?
3) I have started the NodeManager using the startNodeManager.sh script.
4) The admin server port is 7001 and the oam managed server port is 14100.
Any inputs on what might be wrong in the setup will be helpful.Thanks !

By using netstat -anp|grep 5556 you can check which process on your machine is using the 5556 port.

Liquidity Planner - assignment logic!

Hello,
unfortunately I have several problems with the liquidity planner in SAP R/3. From my point of view i`ve done the whole customizing (default-settings, N:M, partially ..., assignment to the liquidity positions, settings for the online update, ...). Everything works fine but I am not able to reproduce the logic of the assignment programm. There are a lot of complex FI-documents which have several clearing documents and it`s almost impossible to check if the assignment programs (1st step: FI assignment / 2nd step: bill-assignment) is working in an acceptable way. Sometimes it looks like that the assignment-program allocate the values in a special way (also if there is an 1:1-assignment between the information-lines and the actual-lines (banc account, ...)).
My questions:
Which experience do you have made with this kind of functionality?
How is your approach to make the assignment (which user-exits do you use, is it necessary to use enquiries, ...)?
Do you know any reports which might be helpful to analyse the assignment logic (I`ve found the program "RFLQ_REXCHAIN2 -> this one is nice for one position but in case of complex documents it`s also not really helpful)?
Do you have any documentation which is more helpful than the oss-notes?
I would be really grateful for a feedback. Thx in advance.
W
Edited by: Werner Hörhager on Jun 24, 2010 5:49 PM

Hello,
unfortunately I have several problems with the liquidity planner in SAP R/3. From my point of view i`ve done the whole customizing (default-settings, N:M, partially ..., assignment to the liquidity positions, settings for the online update, ...). Everything works fine but I am not able to reproduce the logic of the assignment programm. There are a lot of complex FI-documents which have several clearing documents and it`s almost impossible to check if the assignment programs (1st step: FI assignment / 2nd step: bill-assignment) is working in an acceptable way. Sometimes it looks like that the assignment-program allocate the values in a special way (also if there is an 1:1-assignment between the information-lines and the actual-lines (banc account, ...)).
My questions:
Which experience do you have made with this kind of functionality?
How is your approach to make the assignment (which user-exits do you use, is it necessary to use enquiries, ...)?
Do you know any reports which might be helpful to analyse the assignment logic (I`ve found the program "RFLQ_REXCHAIN2 -> this one is nice for one position but in case of complex documents it`s also not really helpful)?
Do you have any documentation which is more helpful than the oss-notes?
I would be really grateful for a feedback. Thx in advance.
W
Edited by: Werner Hörhager on Jun 24, 2010 5:49 PM

Error Dummy items from Customizing have to be excluded @ Liquidity Planner

Dear Experts,
I want to try Liquidity Planner Calculation, using FLQAD,
when in selection screen i aready insert :
- Paying Company Code
- 1st Derivation Step : Query Sequence
- 1st Derivation Step : Exit Module
- 2st Derivation Step : Buffer Item
- 2st Derivation Step : Exit Module
- Test Run
- Detail List
so when Execute / F8, i get error message "Dummy items from Customizing have to be excluded"
please help me.
thx you.

You get this error if the liquidity items in FLQC2/FLQC13 and buffer item field of flqad selection screen are same.
Buffer item refers to liquidity items assigned to vendor/customer recon accounts.
To avoid this error donot use liquidity items from FLQC2/FLQC13 in FLQAD buffer item.

Liquidity planner versus FF7B and CO cost elements

What is the added value of SAP Liquidity Planner (only looking at actual data; the planning function I understand) when Liquidity Forecast (transaction FF7B) and CO (expense cost elements) have already been implemented?

Please, take a look on this discussion
Treasury - FF7B

Regarding Liquidity Planner Customization (Configuration) ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for