Regarding status

Hi all,
         Regarding status code .
    How to find which user has released status, which user has set the status active and
   what are date set & time set in regarding status, & where to find these fields?
   Is there any table where I can find status description and all these fields are stored??

Hi,
if that has been runned as a job, then you can go to sm37 and double click on the release job or the the completed job and then click job details. you can know who had runned this job and what time it was started or going to start...
Regards,
Ramesh.

Similar Messages

Regarding STATUS FIELD INFORMATION OF T.CODE CO03(Display Production Order)

Hello Friends,
I want to know, how could i get the Status field information from T.CodeCO03(Display Production Order).
Any F.M or Table Name.
I have production order Number as input field and output will be Status.
Regards
Amit

Hello Amit ,
u can try fm STATUS_READ.
i think OBJNR u can get it from AFRU.
regards
Prabhu

Regarding status management

Hi,
I have a situation, wherein when a sales order is created, it is assigned a user status of CRTD using status management configuration. My requirement is to track a particular document's user status or system status to trigger a workflow if the document is complete with respect to header and item level info, and the status is in CRTD. I can check the completeness from VBUK table, but does anyone know as to which table the status profile values are stored in? Thanks for the help in advance.
Regards,
Vijay

Hi ,
Check the table JSTO & Jest table.
Also check the FM STATUS_READ
Thanks
Rajeev

Regarding status of job

Hi friends,
we are having some rapidmart , one of the rapid mart job server shows red in color in data services management console
Iam just gettinng confusion whether the job or data has been scheduled succesfully or not?
or Job has already schedule succesfully but i think it may have some errors?
when i check the DSMC iin JOB Trace log It shows
DATAFLOW: Run as separate process flag is set to YES for the Hierarchy_flattening transform <Hierarchy_Flattening> in data flow <DF_xx>. This is because the dataflow is set to run in Pageable cache and Hierarchy flattening cannot run in pageable mode. To avoid running as separate process, set data flow cache type to in_memory_cache.
(so is this a error ? if it is error please guide me how to resolve)
and siome data flows show successful and some are still showing '' started ''
Please assist I am new to this.
Thanks
Thanks in advance

Are you getting a red mark against a local repository? If so, one of your job in the repository has failed. That can either be a scheduled job, or that might have been triggered manually.
DATAFLOW: Run as separate process flag is set to YES
This is not an error seemingly, but a warning that the HF has been set to run as a separate process. If you want to change this warning, right click on the Data Flow and change the Pageable Cache to In Memory. The performance impact can be negative if the memory consumed by the Data Flow is higher than the available virtual memory.
If it is againsts the job server that you find a red status, you probably have set up a server group and is seeing status against this. That means the specified job server cannot connect to it's repository.
Regards,
Suneer

Regarding Status Menu

Hi All,
Is there any transaction to create Pf-status. or only way is to double click in the program and to create?
Then how to find short text for pf-status(Attributes).
Regards
Divakar

Hi,
I am not aware any t/code to create PF-STATUS other than double click in the program (change mode).
Go to SE41 to check PF-STATUS short text/description.
Enter program name and click on drop down button (Status).
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Regarding status in Work In Progress ALV Format Report.

Dear All,
I am creating ALV Report for Work In Progress for PP-module. I want to display Object Status i.e. field STAT table JEST
so for doing this I am Bringing objnr (object number) from table AUFK in my ITAB (it_so) by comparing AUFK-AUFNR
with my ITAB (it_so) AUFNR, then bringing corresponding STAT(object status) from JEST by comparing JEST-OBJNR
with it_so-objnr. Now , the problem is that I am getting only 1st STAT value(I0001). but there are so many STAT For
OBJNR (OR000010018621).
what do do, how to bring all data (STAT) comparing with it_so-objnr.

Hi,
Check the code below:
REPORT ztest_00000002.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab OCCURS 0,
        aufnr LIKE caufv-aufnr,
        objnr LIKE caufv-objnr,
       END OF itab.
DATA :BEGIN OF itab1 OCCURS 0,
       objnr LIKE caufv-objnr,
       stat LIKE jest-objnr,
     END OF itab1.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK b1 WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
PARAMETERS : sp_aufnr LIKE caufv-aufnr.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK b1.
SELECT aufnr objnr FROM caufv INTO TABLE itab
WHERE aufnr = sp_aufnr.
IF itab[] IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT objnr stat FROM jest INTO TABLE itab1
for ALL entries in itab
                    WHERE objnr = itab-objnr.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT itab1.
WRITE : / itab1-objnr, itab1-stat.
ENDLOOP.
Thanks,
Sriram Ponna.

Regarding status of the vendor

Hi All,
Is there any way we can find the status of the vendor i.e., whether he is active or inactive?
If so, where can i find this?
Please anybody help me in this.
Thanks

Gautam,
Is the vendor number (LIFNR) and the personel number (pernr) belong to a same person.
I mean is the employee and the vendor same?
Please help me.
Thanks

Doubt Regarding status group with respect to Incompletion log

Hi,
I just want to know if in status group if i click the radio button delivery & billing then will it alllow me to create delivery and billing even if sales order is incomplete .

Hi,
No delivery & Billing are not carried out unless the sales order is complete. Selecting the radiobuttons delivery & billing indicate that some input data is missing.
Example Shipping point data in sales order is missing then delivery cannot be carried out and the system displays it in incompletion log.
If payment terms are missing in sales order, then billing cannot be carried out and the system displays it in incompletion log.
chan
Message was edited by:
hari sri

How to increase the number of rows in Status Oveview iView in MSS?

Hi
We have implemented MSS and have a question regarding Status overview iview.
The standard status overview iview of the team workset has 5 rows and we have to scroll using the arrow buttons to select/view a request.
Now can anyone explain me how to increase the number of rows in this iview? Is this somthing that has to be accoplished through web dynpro customization?
I checked the options in iView property and do not see any option to increase the number of rows.
please help
Thanks
-Michael

Hi Micheal,
Well, I am not really sure, if you could accomplish this using customizing, but I am sure that you can accomplish this using the JDI. Well, you can extract the application's source code using JDI and then change the required display rows property and republish it.
Am not really sure if this is suggestable method for this requirement,but it can be achieved using this JDI stuff.
Regards
<b>Raja Sekhar</b><i></i>

Want to add new status while searching PO in EBP

Hi All,
While in EBP, I want to search for POs at link: PURCHASE ORDERS>>PROCESS PURCHASE PRDERS>>FIND.
At this position i want to search for the POs with some statuses like: ordered,awaiting approval,in your inbox etc..
I want to add 2 more statuses while searching POs. These statuses are "Transaction Completed" and "Error in Process".
Please tell me how to add these 2 extra statuses there.
Reg,
Bis

Hello Bis,
You can find PO in status 'Error in process' using status drop-down list with wording 'Transfer Failed': this is standard.
Regarding status 'Transaction completed', why do you want to make a difference with standard status 'Ordered' ?
Regards.
Laurent.

Status Sequence not letting to change to other status

Hi All,
I have a question regarding status change using sequence.
I am trying to add sequence to statuses for a status profile, it is like below:
01 Z001 Open              01 99
02 Z002 In Process     01 99
03 Z003 Approve        03 99
04 Z004 Complete      03 99
05 Z005 Closed          04 99
Now my issue:
Once I set the status Z003 (Approve), the system does not allow me to set to status Z002 (In Process) though a program. Is there any way I can set the status Z002 or Z001 without changing the sequence.
Thank you for your quick reply.
Regards,
Abhay

Hi Abhay,
I doubt you can achieve this using a BAdi.(May be I'm wrong but I doubt) It may need standard modification after you find the place where system performs this check.
As Arden Stricke mentions, you can achieve this by changing Low High values. This will enable you to do it manually as well. And if a certain thing can be done manually on WebUI/GUI it can be automated. But if it cannot be done manually, then normally you cannot automate it.
If you cannot change the configuration for any reason, then look for the place where SAP checks for an allowed status and modify it according to your custom logic.
Cheers,
Niraj

Internal Order Status Management

Hi All,
I'm having a query regarding Status Management of Internal Orders.We have created a User Status starting from 10 till 50 to go alongwith the system status. We want a scenario wherein the user cannot change the status from 10 to 20 till such time the BUDGETING PROCESS is not completed at stage 10. Can we do the same by playing in the User Status Management or do we need to invoke User Exits? Please suggest.
Regards,
Prathamesh.

Prathamesh,
In status profile, at each step if you double click, it takes you transaction control. In this screen you can configure which Business transactions that need to be allowed (Influence) and what are the next actions (steps) that can be performed.
Pl. review the configuration elements and let me know if you still need more inputs
Regards,
Som

Status Profile @ Item Level

Hi ALL,
This is regarding Status profile. I have maitained status profie in Quotation item level.
Quotation has to approve by diff depts i.e. MM/PP sequentially.
so i have maintained- as
status no./ status/ initial status/ Lowest/Heighest/Position/Priority
1 / APRD / Approval req'd by MM / 1 / 2 / 1 / 1
2 / OKMM / OK by MM / 2 / 4 / 1 / 1
3 / NOKM / Not Ok by MM / 2 / 4 / 1 / 1
4 / OKPP / Ok by PP / 4 / 6 / 1 / 1
5 / NOKP / Not ok by PP / 4 / 6 / 1 / 1
6 / DONE / Finally approved / 6 / 6 / 1 / 1
when MM dept, trying to choose "NOKM- Not OK by MM" system is not allowing.
as per system settings, I should check status-2, before proceeding to status-3,
where as I want in such a way, either I can choose status 2 or 3.
Let me know, if anyone done this status profiles??

Thanks for your interest.
I have done the rel changes as suggested , system is still giving error.
as per my observation system is not checking at lowest/Heighest levels.
it is checking as per assigned "Status no" such no.1 , 2 & 3 so on.
( Lowest colums i have maintained "2" in step 2 & 3 which allowing me to move from 2 - 3 & 3 - 2, which is fine)
similarly system should allow me choosing from step-1 to step- 3 direclty,
ANYMORE IDeas

Issue-status of the sales order

Hai Gurus,
I'm facingo one problem that eventhogh i created delivery and billing the status of the document in document flow is showing wrong details.
Is there any settings regarding status of teh documents that we make in SAP.
Can any one please explain
Thanks in advance
take care
sameer

Hai veera,
thanks for teh suggestion.hope i will check teh completion rule and confirm u that i will work r not.
i do the necessary settings as specified.
thanks
take care
sameer

User status profiles for work orders and sub-orders

Hi Experts,
I have the following question regarding status profiles for SAP PM work orders (but I guess it relates to all user status profiles).
Customizing
A status profile is defined for order type "PM_A", which contains an authorization key "OP" for certain user states (to be set by the ordering party)
Situation
The ordering party A creates an order of type PM_A for contractor B, and B then creates a sub-order of type PM_A for contractor C
Problem
- If I assign the authorization key "OP" only to roles of party A, then party B can't set the user states reserved for the ordering party (correct for the order A->B, but not for the sub-order B->C)
- If I assign the authorization key "OP" to roles of party A and party B, then B could set certain user states reserved for the ordering party in the order A->B, which is also wrong
Question
Is there a way to restrict sub-orders differently than "non-sub-orders", or do I have to create a "sub-order order-type" for each order type, in order to assign them different status profiles and authorization keys?
Thanks a lot!

hi
since you have 3 roles to be assigned to the same order type with different authorization ,it is better you create an seperate order type for sub order and assign the user status with authorization for B and C
regards
thyagarajan

Regarding status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for