Regarding STO and VL10B

Hi All,
When we creting a PO it gives a warning message "Shipping point 1100 not allowed for Shipping condition 02,loading group 0001 plant 1100" so we are not generating outbound delivary in VL10B.Please guide us.
Thanks & Regards
Suresh.

Hi Suresh
Firstly ,As you are getting  error "Shipping point 1100 not allowed for Shipping condition 02,loading group 0001 plant 1100"  . so check in MMR with which shipping point you have created the plant. and also check what is your plant.
Secondly also check the enterprise structure assignments.
Finally check OVL2 and check wheather assignments have been done with shipping conditions , loading group and plant for e deriving shipping point
Regards
Srinath

Similar Messages

  • REGARDING STO ISSUE

    HI GURUS,
                        I HAD CREATED STO BUT THE LINE ITEM IS NOT DISPLAYED IN VL10B SCREEN,I HAD MAINTAINED ALL DETAILS PROPERLY IN STO AND IT IS SAVED BUT NO LINE ITEM IS DISPLAYED IN VL10 B SCREEN .
                         SO PLZ GIVE ME SOME HELPFUL GUIDE LINES
    REGARDS
    KIRAN

    Hi,
    Check if the 'shipping' tab is appearing on the line item tab. If not then check the STO settings in config. The assignment of STO doc type ( generally UB), STO delivery type (NL), supplying point and checking rule must be missing. Make the settings following path-MM-Purchasing Docs---Set up STOs.
    Check by creating a new doc.
    Regards,
    Saurabh Diwakar

  • STO and Plant to plant materials transfer

    Hi,
      We have three plant in three different compnay code we are doing material transfer with MB1B  and it is working fine  now we want configure the STO ,  what is the advantage of STO  comparing to simple plant to plant material transfer  and in case of STO how accounting entry wil be generate  , also can u give the steps for customizationn setting for STO  and some links for the same.
    regards,
      zafar

    Hi,
    Confg steps for STO.
    1. Define shipping points for plants
    2. Create checking rule.
    3. Define checking rule.
    4. Assign deliery type to che. rule.
    Create Customer in Suppling plant for receiving plant
    Create vendor at receiving plant  for supplying plant.
    maintain material with Sales view for shipping point,
    create PO ME21n with Doc tyoe NB.
    Outbound delivery  Vl10B
    PGI --VL02N
    GR --- MIGO
    Acounting doc. at PGI.
    Move type: 643 &101  2 step
                       645 & 101 1 step
    Acc key
    BSX -
    GBB (VKA) +
    Billing
    Customer +
    Other sales dedution -
    Hope this will help.
    SAM

  • How to identify the emergency orders in STO and Sales Order

    Hi,
    kindly let us know is there any field in header details of STO and Sales Order where we can identify the emergency orders,
    In our STO Process we are creating more STO's from one warehouse to one Store,but in that orders we have some of the orders are emergency order's.
    Note:-if we create new order type then we can deference the orders but as per the business requirement we need to give same order type. 
    Thanks & Regards,
    Murali.M
    +91-9321526563.

    Thanks

  • STO and Multiple Schedule Line

    Hi,
    we create STO and we trigger ATP in SCM. We are currently getting multilple schedule lines. Then if you create a sales order and trigger ATP check it does not see all the schedule lines on the STO. It only sees the requested date and requested QTY.
    Any idea why we are not promising on all those schedule lines on the sales order?
    Let me know if someone saw this behavior before.
    Regards
    David

    Hi David,
    I suppose you have not activated the following customizing in APO:
    SAP - Implementation Guide
    Advanced Planning and Optimization
    Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP)
    Product Availability Check
    Consider Confirmed Quantity of Receipts
    Please check and activate to consider confirmed quantities instead of requested qty for STOs.
    best regards,
    Michael

  • STOs and Productions order are not lined up. Dates are off

    Hi Experts
    I have a production order and STO with different dates. I would expect no gap between Prod order and the STO. I have checked Planned delivery time,GR/GI at both supplying and receiving plant . Everything looks fine. Please Advice

    Ganpath,
    In general, both of those objects are executables.  In most applications, the relationship between the dates of STOs and the dates of Production Orders is not directly determined by the software,  It is only through careful design and execution of the overall process that you achieve dates that line up; assuming, of course, that is your business requirement (not everyone wants dates to line up).
    So, it depends upon how these two objects were created.  Can you please describe how they were created?
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Table for STO and Production Order

    Hello Experts,
    I would like to know in which table I can find a relation between STO and his related Production Order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Mayur

    Sorry!! I've selected wrong forum.

  • Table for STO and his production order in manufacturing plant.

    Hello Experts,
    I would like to know in which table I can find a relation between STO and his related Production Order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Mayur
    Edited by: mayur kshirsagar on Dec 19, 2007 1:48 PM

    Dear Mayur,
    For Production order related tables check in
    AFKO              Order Header
    AFPO               Order Item Detail
    AFVC               Order Operations Detail
    AFFL                Order Sequence Details
    AFFH               Order PRT Assignment
    AFBP               Order Batch Print Requests
    AFRU               Order Completion Confirmations
    AFFW              Confirmations -- Goods Movements with Errors
    AFRC               Confirmations -- Incorrect Cost Calculations
    AFRD               Confirmations -- Defaults for Collective Confirmation
    AFRH               Confirmations -- Header Info for Confirmation Pool
    AFRV               Confirmation Pool
    AFWI               Confirmations -- Subsequently Posted Goods Movements
    AUFK     Order master data
    AUFM     Goods Movements for Order
    VBAG                           Sales Document: Release Data by Schedule Line in Sch.Agrmt.
    VBAK                           Sales Document: Header Data                               
    VBAP                           Sales Document: Item Data                                 
    VBBE                           Sales Requirements: Individual Records                    
    VBBS                           Sales Requirement Totals Record                           
    are you meaning stock?
    then check in MARD.
    Regards
    Mangal

  • The "always allow" button is grayed out in settings regarding cookies, and I can not find where to change the setting.  (Restrictions are not on.)

    The "always allow" button is grayed out in settings regarding cookies, and I can not find where to change the setting.  (Restrictions are not on.)  Do you know where I go to change the setting to allow me to "always allow" cookies?

    Hi lisaarnett111,
    If you are having issues turning on Always Allow for cookies in Safari on your iPad, you may want to check to make sure that you don't have Private Browsing enabled, as noted in the following article:
    Turn Private Browsing on or off on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch - Apple Support
    Regards,
    - Brenden

  • Question regarding selectOneMenu and PROCESS_VALIDATIONS(3) phase

    Hi im a bit lost regarding selectOneMenu and how validation phase all works together.
    The thing is that i have a simple selectOneMenu
    <h:form id="SearchForm">                                                  
         <h:panelGrid columns="3"  border="0">
              <h:outputLabel id="caseTypeText" value="#{msg.searchCaseCaseType}" for="caseType" />                         
              <h:selectOneMenu id="caseType" value="#{searchCaseBean.caseType}" style="width: 200px;" binding="#{searchCaseBean.caseTypeSelect}">     
                   <f:selectItem itemValue="" itemLabel="#{msg.CommonTextAll}" />                                             
                   <f:selectItems value="#{searchCaseBean.caseTypes}"  />                              
              </h:selectOneMenu>
              <h:message for="caseType" styleClass="errorMessage" />
              <h:panelGroup />
              <h:panelGroup />
              <h:commandButton action="#{searchCaseBean.actionSearch}" value="#{msg.buttonSearch}" />
         </h:panelGrid>
    </h:form>Now when i hit submit button i can see that the bean method searchCaseBean.caseTypes (used in the <f:selectItems> tag) is executed in the PROCESS_VALIDATIONS(3) phase. How come? I dont whant this method to be executed in phase 3, only in phase 6.
    If i add the this in the method if (FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getRenderResponse())
    public List<SelectItem> getStepStatuses(){
         List<CaseStep> caseSteps = new ArrayList<CaseStep>();
         if (FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getRenderResponse()) {
              caseSteps = getCaseService().getCaseStep(value);     
         List<SelectItem> selectItems = new ArrayList<SelectItem>(caseSteps.size());
         for(int i=0; i < caseSteps.size(); i++){
              CaseStep step = caseSteps.get(i);               
              String stepStatus = step.getStatus() + "_" + step.getSubStatus();           
              selectItems.add(new SelectItem(stepStatus, step.getShortName()));
         return selectItems;
    } Now i get a validation error (javax.faces.component.UISelectOne.INVALID) for the select field and only phase1, phase2, phase 3 and phase 6 is executed.
    Im lost?

    I see. Many thanxs BalusC. Im using your blog very often, and its very helpfull for me.
    I changed now to use the constructor load method instead. But know im getting problem of calling my service layer (Spring service bean). Its seems they havent been init when jsf bean is calling its constructor.
    Can i init the spring service bean from the faces-config file?
    JSF Bean
        public SearchCaseBean() {
              super();
                    //caseService need to be init
              if(getCaseService() == null){
                   setCaseService((CaseService)getWebApplicationContextBean("caseService"));
              fillCaseTypeSelectItems();
              fillCaseStatusSelectItems();
    .....faces-config
    <managed-bean>
              <managed-bean-name>searchCaseBean</managed-bean-name>
              <managed-bean-class>portal.web.SearchCaseBean</managed-bean-class>
              <managed-bean-scope>request</managed-bean-scope>          
              <managed-property>
                   <property-name>caseService</property-name>
                   <value>#{caseService}</value>
              </managed-property>
         </managed-bean>

  • Question regarding roaming and data usage

    I am currently out of my main country of service, and as such I have a question regarding roaming and data usage.
    I am told that the airplane mode is sufficient from keeping the phone off from roaming, but does this apply to any background data usage for applications and such?
    If the phone is in airplane mode, are all use of the phone including wifi and application use through the wifi outside of all extra charges from roaming?

    Ann154 wrote:
    If you are getting charged to use the wifi, then it is possible.  Otherwise no
    Just to elaborate here, Ann154 is referring to access charges for wifi, which is nothing to do with Verizon, so if you are using it in a plane, hotel, an internet cafe etc that charges for Wifi rather than being free .   Verizon does not charge you (or indeed know about!) wifi usage, or any other usage that is not on their cellular network (such as using a foreign SIM for example in global phones)  So these charges, if any, will not show up on the verizon bill app.  Having it in airplane mode prevents all cellular data traffic so you should be fine

  • Question regarding MM and FI integration

    Hi Experts
    I have a question regarding MM and FI integration
    Is the transaction Key in OMJJ is same as OBYC transaction key?
    If yes, then why canu2019t I see transaction Key BSX in Movement type 101?
    Thanks

    No, they are not the same.  The movement type transaction (OMJJ) links the account key and account modifier to a specific movement types.  Transaction code (OBYC) contains the account assignments for all material document postings, whether they are movement type dependent or not.  Account key BSX is not movement type dependent.  Instead, BSX is dependent on the valuation class of the material, so it won't show in OMJJ.
    thanks,

  • **question regarding 3G and wif**.

    I have a question regarding 3G and wifi. I have #G activated as well as wifi, when I go to retrieve mail for example I get a pop up asking me if I want to connect to a wifi network…should I have wifi and 3G activated at the same time, and why am I getting the pop up…
    Thanks

    You can have them on at the same time, but they will not be used at the same time for data. The order of preference for data is WiFi > 3G > EDGE > GPRS. You're getting the pop up, most likely, because you have Settings > Wi-Fi > Ask to Join Networks set to ON. You can set that to OFF, and the iPhone will still join known (i.e. previously used) WiFi networks automatically.

  • Question regarding Dashboard and column prompt

    My question regarding Dashboard and column prompt:
    1) Dashboard prompt usually work with only for columns which are in subject area. In my report I've created some of the columns which are based on other columns. Like I've daysNumber column that is based on two other columns, as it calculates the difference of two dates. When I create dashboard prompt I can't find this column there. I need to make a prompt on this column.
    2)For one of the column I've only two values 1 and 0. When I create prompt for this column, is it possible that in drop down list It shows 'Yes' for 1 and 'No' for 0 and still filter the request??

    Hi Toony,...
    I think there was another way of doing this...
    In the dashboard prompt go to Show option > select SQL Results from dropdown.
    There you need to write your Logical SQL like...
    SELECT CASE WHEN 1=0 THEN PERIODS.YEAR ELSE difference of date functionality END FROM SubjectAreaName
    Here.. Periods.Year is the column which is already exists in repository's presentation layer..
    and difference of date functionality is the code or formula of column which you want to show in drop-down...
    Also write the CASE WHEN 1=0 THEN PERIODS.YEAR ELSE difference of date functionality END code in fx of that prompt.
    I think it helps you in doing this..
    Just check and inform me if it works...
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore Guggilla
    Edited by: Kishore Guggilla on Oct 31, 2008 9:35 AM

  • STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of background

    Hi experts,
    In return document (with reference to Work Order), When user is selecting recommended action u2018YAu2019 and clicking the u2018returnu2019 button, an STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of generating them in background.
    T-code - o3o_RT02
    Test case
    Create Work Order (IW31)
    Create return document w.r.t Work Order (o3o_RT01)
    Select recommended action u2018YAu2019, save and select u2018returnu2019 button.

    Hi,
    Could you checkthe foll cust link in SPRO:
    Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders).
    PO is created if you set the "*" for EITHER the purchasing group OR the product category.
    SRM is creating PR or PO depending on:
    - SRM customizing (ex: always external proc + PR if incomplete, PO if complete)
    - the interpretation of SC data by R/3.
    IF your SC is considered complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
    For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
    Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
    - prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
    - custom checks in user exits in R/3
    - error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
    To debug without debuging into R/3, you can also try the following:
    - use BADI DETERMINE_TARGET_OBJECT and force PO creation
    - so the system will always try to create a PO
    - R/3 won't create the PO (for the same reason as in META_INTERPRETE_DATA), and will raise an error in SRM
    - finally you get the real error in application monitor (SC --> backend application errors
    Related thread:
    Re: PO not create from SC with source of supply in classic sena
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

Maybe you are looking for