Regarding TEST System Build

Dear All,
We are planning to build a test system by copying one of our production database.
We are planning to use the homogeneous system copy method by offline backup .
Our Production system is SAP release 4.6c and database is
Oracle 10g and the OS is HP-UX .
Please suggest some important things which shd be considered during this ....
Thanks,
Jagadish ..

Hi Jagadish,
You should check the new SAPINST for Oracle 10g.
Because you old SAPINT will not allow you to use Oracle 10g as your database.
Other wise you should install using default oracle version and do upgrade to Oracle 10g than you can restore you offline production database.
Regards,
Fendi

Similar Messages

Cant find my file in Test system JDI

Hi ALL,
SORRY FOR LONG DESCRIPTION, BUT I WANTED TO EXPLAIN THE PROBLEM CLEARLY.
I have installed and configured JDI SP9 on WAS 6.40 SP9. I think there is not much difference between scenario 2+ and 3 configuration wise.. only difference is follow on tracks..for that i think not much config is needed.. anyhow we planned to implement scenario 2+ for time being. everything went smooth..didnt find many errors.. but we are missing to accomplish the goal
1. After importing Development config and adding a webmodule DC and enterprise application DC to SC. when I say checkin, It checks in all the files to DTR and what does "activate" do, I see that a central build is performed here. Is this the point where the files get deployed into my Development server? (please let me know). if so as what files will this be deployed into my server (if I am not wrong .sda ?? )
2. I already created Domain, Track and in runtime systems tab, I provided DEV,QA and PRD. following from the prev step, I released my activite from NWDS, which I was able to see in CONSOLIDATE tab in status "waiting for import" . and i clicked on import and the status changed to "import finished".
3. then it is turn of assembling. so it was here in "waiting for assembly" I selected my comp and clicked on "assemble component" and the status changed to "assembled".
AFAIK an SCA file will be formed in this step. I have seen this SCA file in JDI SYSTEM. /jtrans/archives.
Next, I clicked on TEST tab, but I didnt find this file there in status "waiting for import".. why is it so?
Let us think Assembly failed, if so, why did it showed me status assembled in assembly tab. and what would be the reasons that an assembly would fail?
4. anyhow my next trail was when assembling, this time i selected a checkbox "assemble even with inconsitencies".. so it changed to "assembled" state. and I could see this one in /Jtrans/archives and also it was in TEST tab with status "waiting for approval". then i clicked on import and it changed to "import finished". Then i searched for this file in Test system, but I didnt find this file there.
Experts, Please throw your suggestions
Thank you

Hi Shiva,
1. Activate process triggers a Central Build and it copies the sources from the inactive workspace in the DTR to the active workspace if the build is successful.No its is not at this point where your file is deployed. It is only after you release the activity for transport and then you import is your application deployed to the relevant runtime system.
3. Once you assembled your component and it did not show in the TEST tab then you should have checked the logs of the previous assembly that you did. This you can do by clicking the history button then select the relevant row in the table displayed and clicking the Details button. Under the Logs tab you will get all the logs and will show exactly where the assembly may have failed.
4. Again after you imported the component in the TEST system you should have gone in the history selected the relevant line in the table and clicked on the Details button. Under the logs tab you will find what all steps were executed and whether any step failed. You will also get a detailed explaination as to why the build failed.
If the logs show success then you can log in to Visual Admin and check whether your application has been deployed in the TEST runtime system.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Sidharth

Need SAP Test System

My company is building a specialized Java based systems integration tools. We want to test it with SAP. For now, we just want to build a demo that uses Java to invoke BAPIs that manipulate customer/order data.
How can we get an SAP test system set up to do this kind of thing? Is there a trial software program or a developers license?

Welcome to SDN.
You can download trial ABAP system from the following link. (its in downloads->SAP Evaluation Software->Web AS)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/downloaditem?rid=/library/uuid/cfc19866-0401-0010-35b2-dc8158247fb6
if you have issues with installing and configuring you can get help from the following forums
SAP NetWeaver Application Server
Software Downloads
Regards
Raja

Oracle DB copy from PRD system 10g to TEST system 11g

Hi All,
I have recently upgraded Oracle in the test system from 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.2. My Production system ran still with the old oracle version 10.2.0.4.
Now I need to refresh the test system.
Is that possible to be made at all, a database copy from production system (with old oracle version 10g) into test system (with the new version 11g) ?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Regards
Latif

We must have taken the
When you upgraded 10.2.0.X.X to 11.2.0.2.0 on TST System
You would have defintiely taken the 10.2.0.X.X. ( Oracle Home Backup)
I Strongly feel..
Resotre home folder in Qty System
Change the Environment Variables of s<sid>adm & ora<sid> users to oracle 10.2.0.X.X home directory
Change listener file entires.
Restore backup of Production of 10.2.0.X.X
recover system as you have not done any upgrade on QTY and release.
...The rest all approaches may consume your extensive .
You are the best judge...
How you want to build TST System ....want to make easy ...want to make hard your self.
Business wants data ..The rest all yours decission i think
Rgds

Crosstalk test system

Hello,
I am trying to figure out a way to build crosstalk test system using the following HW/SW:
- 8- HP8133A: pulse gens (upto 8 driven lines)
- TDS8000 scope
- Labview 7.1
- Test vehicle (MoBo+daughter card)
- cables
Obviously, it would be necessary to "de-skew" and confirm both 1)"pulse timing" and 2)rise-time input to DUT. (before actually measure crosstalk)
The final goals are:
- To test both single-ended and differential channel signal(s)
- To have range of 1 to 8 driven lines
- To save instrument state for pulse and test settings
- To display crosstalk plots on scope or screen capture(?)
- To generate automatic crosstalk (NEXT/FEXT) report (for spreadsheet)
I would appreciate your advice/help, sharing similar experience for pointing me into the right direction.
Best regards,

jjlee,
I have never built a system like the one you described, but I did find that there are instrument drivers for the HP8133A, and the TDS8000 on www.ni.com/idnet. They might at least provide a place for you to start, and if you run into problems along the way others might be able to help with the specific problems you encounter.
Shawn B.
National Instruments
Use NI products on Linux? Come join the NI Linux Users Community

Open and close posting periods on test system

Hello together,
to open and close posting periods is only allowed on the develepment und the production client, but not on the test client.
It is an customizing object, but the flag "current settings" is set, so you also can change the settings on the production system.
In the test system, it only can be changed by opening the system for customizing using SCC4 und change to "Changes without automatic recording".
Is there a way to allow open and close posting periods on the test system without opening the client for customizing?
Regards,
Michael

Hi Michael,
Please, refer to the note 356483. Proceed as following:
Call transaction SE54
Enter the Customizing object (view or table)
Select "Generated objects"
Choose "Create/change"
Select "no, or user, recording routine" in the bottom part of the screen
Save the change
The view in your case is V_T001B.
Regards,
Eli

New System Build feedback/advice, please...

Time to build a new WorkStation. My motivation for upgrading is that I have been using a mediocore laptop (i7m, 8gb, 250gb ) from my work as my home system for the last 2 years, I am starting to get more freelance coming in and need a good desktop.
I am not so sure about my processor, mother board and video card choice. I am more interested in app usability than absolute throughput and want to maximise my dollar investment.
Purchase date: this week
Budget: I'd like to stay close to $1000-1300, but can spend more for significant performance gains. As I do more research, my inclinations are trending higher.
System Usage: My primary uses will include photo editing with Lightroom and Photoshop, 3D graphics using 3D studio Max, Maya and Mud Box, HD video editing using Premiere and After Affects and Web Design. I will also use it as an HD media player and hifi audio is important. Maximizing cs6 performance in premiere & pShop is my main target. I am focused mainly on user experience while running these apps. If I need to encode hrs of video or crank out frames in max/maya, I can do it at work. I seldom run games.
Monitors: I'm running two Dell U2410's IPS, calibrated w\Color Munki, one portrait one lanscape.
Parts to Upgrade: Full system build
O/S : Win7 Ultimate, I might play with Ubuntu/Virtualization
Vendor: Newegg unless I can save big $$ else where. I like B&H.
It needs to be an Intel machine & I have chosen lga 2011 becuase I'll eventually go to 64gb. I'll do some modest overclocking.
Any advice is appreciated. Thank you for your expertise.
Processor:
Intel Core i7-3820 Sandy Bridge-E 3.6GHz (3.8GHz Turbo Boost) LGA 2011 130W Quad-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73820
$299 w/ship
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115229
or
Intel Core i7-3930K Sandy Bridge-E 3.2GHz (3.8GHz Turbo) LGA 2011 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73930K
$569 w/ship
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116492
Do you have any feeling about how much I'll gain by going to the 6 core cpu over the 4 core? Remember, for me usability in the cs6 apps is more important than marginal gains in throughput.
Mobo:
MSI X79A-GD45 (8D) LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard with UEFI BIOS
$218 w/ship
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130635
or
ASRock X79 Extreme6 LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
$240 w/ship
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157289
or
MSI Big Bang-XPower II LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 XL ATX Intel Motherboard with UEFI BIOS
$380
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130626
I would really appreciate any feedback on mobos in regards to maximizing cs6...7...8 performance, system logiveity, and performance. Is it worth it to go for a higer end mobo? If so which one. I like the msi's based on eventually ug to 128 gb, but are they money well spent? Any probs w/these mobo's?
Memory:
G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL10Q-32GBXL
$130
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231490
Hard Drive:
SAMSUNG 830 Series MZ-7PC256B/WW 2.5" 256GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
$160
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147164
Video:
GIGABYTE GV-N65TOC-1GI GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
$160 w/ship
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125447
or
MSI N660 Ti PE 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
Item#: N82E16814127696
$300
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127696
I am still a little unsure of the real world differnces that I'll realize by doubling my video card expense, advice please?
Optical Drive:
LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM 4MB Cache SATA BDXL Blu-Ray Burner with SW, 3D Play Back - BH14NS40
$70
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136250
Case:
COOLER MASTER HAF 912 RC-912-KKN1 Black SECC/ ABS Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
$60
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119233
Power Supply:
FX Core Edition PRO650W (P1-650S-NLB9) 650W ATX12V 2.2 & ESP12V 2.91 SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Active PFC Power Supply
$90
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817207014
Total $1190
or $1760
I have picked the MSI motherboard due to its support for 128gb ram, superior audio and other high end features. The AS Rock for its rep for solid value/performance. Opinions?
Finally, I would like some advice on video cards. I prefer nVidia to ATI, but I'm not sure which chip to go for. The six fifties are cheaper, but the 660 ti provides more CUDA cores.

Alex,
I sure wish you would quick picking fights with lots of knowledgeable people just trying to help people build good PCs for running Adobe Premiere. (I am stating that based on not just this thread, but rather the strong challenges you seem to bring to about half of the threads that you've chosen to participate in).
I was the original poster to suggest that Neal select a larger case. Next Harm agreed and cited 6 points which I would agree with regarding why a larger box is better for a video editing rig.
What are the typical goals for someone wanting a video editing PC? I would expect that most users want:
- robust, runs and never fails
- has incredible power; face it, video editing with AVCHD is one of the most taxing applications a PC can face today
- quiet; who wants to be doing creative work with any server room like wind noise
Now let me be specific where you are simply WRONG WRONG WRONG:
You stated: "Back pressure increases in larger spaces due to natural impedance of airflow (much like with electricity traveling over distance)"
Fact: Exactly the opposite; Back pressure decreases in larger spaces due to more room for the air to flow (much like thicker copper passes electricity with less resistance than a thin wire)
Your stated: "Open non-compartmentalized spaces are a recipe for hot spots - areas of turbulence with higher temperatures." and then cited a server room article talking about cooling air taking the path of least resistance -- going under the floor in a server room, instead of through rack mounted servers.
Fact: Lots of open space for large, slow moving fans to keep a video editing box cool is a great way to go
You stated: "Full towers - in themselves - are worse for cooling"
Fact: That is one crazy indefensible statement!
I seriously doubt that you fully comprehend the differences and importance of thermal conductivity, heat capacity, conduction, convection, and radiation for you to make the statements that you have so far and these are the staples for discussing how heat transfer takes place.
Note to other readers... There are lots of ways to cool components including cpus, hard drives, gpus and memory. I suspect that the noise levels brought by servers and some gamers would be totally offensive to the ambient noise level that you want in the room with you for video editing. Therefore we are left with just a few quiet alternatives: 1) lots of volume at low velocity (large cases, large fans, slow rpm), 2) liquid cooling, and 3) Cases with doors or baffles to keep the sound from a noisier solution from getting back to your ears.
Regards,
Jim

How can I handle deploying multiple test systems on the same PC that have been developed using different versions of LabVIEW, TestStand, and/or Switch Executive?

The major issue here is that the test systems must be documented and validated before being released to the production floor. Given this if a test station has multiple test systems deployed on it that have been developed on various versions of LV, TS, and Switch exec how can I force the test system selected to use the correct versions of TS, LV, and Switch exec.? I understand that the solution would be to recomplie everything and bring them up to the latest version but that would then require re-validation according to the QA department. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
It would be nice if theTS deployment was more like an LV executable... meaning when a LV executable is launched it always knows what LV runtime engine to use when there are multiple engines installed on a PC.

Hi,
Multiply versions of teststand can reside on the same system, but only one version can run at a time. They is a utility that has to be run to set the active version.
The SequenceFiles have a version number, and you will find an error will be generate if you try to Load the sequencefile in the wrong version of TestStand.
The labview VIs will only work providing the correct version of the RTE is also installed on your system, even a labview executabe requires the correct RTE to be installed, either as part of the executable installation or as a seperate installation, before the labview exe will work correctly.
I'm not fimilar with the Switch exec but I would expect that it will also require the correct lower level device drivers to be available for the version you are using.
Therefore, as you are indicating that some of your system are at a older version, its difficult to image how you could achive this, considering if you say you have different versions of the software(s). For a start, you may have the problem that newer code/ sequencefiles using additional functionatily not available in the older versions.
I would think your only solution would be to have different deployments covering the different versions you have, or at least bring all your test systems up to the same version of teststand.
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer

How to setup a BW test system?

Hi
We are having R/3 and now we are planning to install BW. Now a few questions are coming to us like...
1. In what cases we need a test system? Can we bypass test system and have development and productive system only?
2. How to setup a test system? Should we reload data from R/3 test system or can it be sourced from BW Productive system (in order to get more historical data)?
3. Has anybody setup a test system and loaded data from BW Productive system before?
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Pundit

Hi Arjun,
It is depends on client, for eg:say if client follows Sixsigma processes, then give much importance on Quality. So in this scenario it becomes much clear to have Quality box, If for other clients who don't have much Quality processes in place. you can take up the Quality (test) in Development box itself.
And it also depends on data you want have test on. For some clients they move much of their historical data for testing purpose..
Also some clients mainatain all 3 boxes(Dev,QA & Prod.)in sink..so that it would be easy for any changes or whatsoever.
Hope this helps...
Best Regards,
DMK
*Assign points if it helps...

OSS note is not working in production but works correctly in test system .

hello friends ,
weh have implemented one OSS notes , which is working corectly in Test system , but not working in production .
Could you please let me know , what could be the reason ?
OSS note no 1064273-
Regards,
Manoj

Pls. check with Basis if the OSS note has been implemented properly and successfully.

Strange problem in report Execution in test system

Hi,
As something strange going on my program in test system.
1) Executing the program in Development system using SE38->program name->F8. the program executes and display selection screen fraction of seconds.
issue:
When i am doing same process in TEST System(using SE38->program name->F8) the execution process is min 1 or 2 min , then i am gettign the Selection screen.
I have checked other programs in TEST System but it doesnu2019t happen to any other programs on TEST system.
Program functionality--
i am using 2 table and MARA and Z table, Using Selection screen i am extracting the data into output screen and excel download
Dispaly
1)if user select the Radio button output to screen in selection screen
Display data into screen using some color formatted
2)if user select the Radio button output to file in selection screen
I am using OLE Automation Controller to get the Output excel download some color formatted data
please let me know how to rsolve this type of isssue in Test system...
plz respond when you find the time.
Regards,
AS
Moderator Message: Urgency downgraded.
Edited by: kishan P on Apr 13, 2011 11:59 AM

Yes ..
INITIALIZATION. Event i have written code like free the objects ans clear Work Area and Refresh the Internal tables
And
*-to highlight the comments on selection-screen
LOOP AT SCREEN.
    IF SCREEN-GROUP1 = 'RM1'.
      SCREEN-INTENSIFIED = '1'.
      MODIFY SCREEN.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Add entries to get the search help values
PERFORM SEARCHELP_REGION.
PERFORM SEARCHELP_COUNTRY.
At selection screen event i am getting the search help for the region and country
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR S_REGN-LOW.
*Search help for Region
PERFORM SEARCHHELP_REGN_F4.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR S_CTRY-LOW.
*Search help for Country
   PERFORM SEARCHHELP_CTRY_F4.
using FM :*FM for F4 help for returning the value to be displayed
CALL FUNCTION 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
Please let me know is it couse problem in TEST System....
so how to resolve the issue...
Regards,
SR

Cannot find the Web Content repository in test system under KM Content

Hi Experts,
We have implemented Web Page Composer in our development landscape. I have created a web page with the required content in the development and now wish to transport this web page and its content to our test system.
However when I navigate to Content Administration -> KM Content, inside the root directory I am not able to find the Web Content repository within which all WPC content resides.
I want to know what configuration has to be done in the test system so that the Web Content repository becomes available within KM Content.
Thanks and Regards,
Saurabh

Hi,
I just want a confirmation on whether I will have to deploy the .SCA file for Web Page Composer in my test and production systems to be able to use the web pages I have created in the development environment.
Regards,
Saurabh

BSP pages in test system after transport have same URL as development

Hi. I have just transported some BSP's from our development into our test system and have encountered a problem.
The URL's of each page is the same as it was in the development system, so when we try and use the pages in the test system we get a "service can not be reached" error.
I am relatively new to BSPs and this is the first time I have transported them. I presumed the URL would update to reflect each server.
Have I missed a setting or something? I searched on SDN but could not find a similar post.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Regards,
Dave.

Hi,
check whether the service is active in transaction SICF
(it may become inactive, when there is patch applied, upgrade , etc)
then you will get one screen there then what you need to do is
without entering anything just click execute and expand the tree to
default_hots->sap->bc->bsp->sap-> under this node you should be able to see your BSP name . right click on it and click activate.
here The BSP Name is nothing but the BSP Application name. When you create a BSP applicaiton, a SICF service is created along with the BSP application. All the request that the user makes to this BSP application is processed by the service only with the help of this corresponding SICF service.
regards
Bhavana

How do CVI7.0 runtime engine and TestStand3.0 runtime engine work in a test system?

I developed code modules from CVI 7.0, and test sequence from TestStand 3.0. Now I want to deploy all to a test system. Should I create distribution kits for CVI and TestStand, and install to a target PC? Do each kit include the RTE? How do the runtime engine work in a system?

hp7550,
I saw your post earlier entitled "what is a run-time engine?". It looks like this post is addressing the same issue.
To answer your questions, it is not necessary to create a distribution kit for your CVI code modules. You can simply install the CVI Run-time Engine, which you can find if you go to www.ni.com and click on the Drivers and Updates link on the left-hand side.
Then you will need to deploy your TestStand system using Tools >> Deploy TestStand System in the Sequence Editor. That tool will go out and gather all the CVI code modules your sequence calls - unless you are calling a DLL or something dynamically inside of a code module; in which case, you need to add that dynamically called DLL (or code module) to your TestStand workspace.
To install the TestStand Run-time Engine, make sure the Install TestStand Engine option is checked on the Installer Options tab of the deployment utility. You can customize what gets installed with the engine by clicking on the Engine Options.
For more information on deployment, see Chapter 14 of the TestStand Reference manual (Help >> Search the TestStand Bookshelf...).
To answer your last question a run-time engine simply gives you access to the compiled code that corresponds to the functions you used from the CVI or TestStand libraries during development.
I hope that helps.
Best Regards,
Matt P.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

How to transport the DATABASE TABLE into the Test system ?

Hi Experts,
I am working on BI7, I had created Database table in BDV system using SE11. Tech_name is ZGLACC_TEMP. I had activated it. I had used this database table for the purpose of writing the start routine in the transformation. while I am transporting the transformations to the test system, It is showing as syntax error in ABAP program,
In BDV system there are no syntax errors. it is working fine,
So now I have to transport the database table to test system so that I can transport the transformations into Test system without any error.
Kindly anyone can give the answer , it will be appreciate and points will be assigned.
thanks
sekhar

Hi Sekhar,
Go to SE11, go into the change mode of your table and change the Object Directory entry (Goto -> Object Directory Entry) to some valid package (other than $tmp). Then it will ask for a transport request. Give a transport request and then I believe you know what to do with that transport.
Another thing to keep in mind ... transport all the data elements and domains you have created for this table. Change their Object Directory Entry and assign them to the same transport request.
Best regards,
Kazmi

Regarding TEST System Build

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for