REGARDING VENDOR QUALITY RATING
Hi All
My client wants vendor quality rating
for this i maintend quality score in clint data maintened score procedure and assing it to inspection type
define the formula for quality rating in functional modul for Q score procedure
is this suficient or i m missing some thing pls tell me
regards
Sachin
HI
endor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
With regrds
Yashodhan
Similar Messages
-
Hi QM Experts,
My client is calculating Vendor Quality Rating based on following Formula
QR = ( (Q1Q2X1Q3X2Q5X3Q6X4+Q7X5)/Q ) *100
QR = Quality Rating
Q1 = Quantity Accepted
Q2= Quantity Accepted with Deviation
Q3= Quantity Accepted with Rectification
Q4 = Quantity Rejected
Q5= Field Failure
Q6= In process rejection due to material defect from vendor
Q7= Customer Notification about Quality problem
Q = (Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7)
X1= 0.8 Factor
X2=0.75
X3=0.5
X4=0.65
X5=0.6
Please help me how to map the above in SAP
Regards,
RajHi Kaushik
Thanks for your quick response,
I have already posted the formula, anyhow once again I will post it.
QR = ( (Q1Q2X1Q3X2Q5X3Q6X4+Q7X5)/Q ) *100
QR = Quality Rating
Q1 = Quantity Accepted
Q2= Quantity Accepted with Deviation
Q3= Quantity Accepted with Rectification
Q4 = Quantity Rejected
Q5= Field Failure
Q6= In process rejection due to material defect from vendor
Q7= Customer Notification about Quality problem
Q = (Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7)
X1= 0.8 Factor
X2=0.75
X3=0.5
X4=0.65
X5=0.6
Regards,
Raj -
Material Level Total Vendor Quality Rating (TVQR) Report
Hi, In SAP QM there is ME61 standard report is available for vendor evalution
But i want This report at Vendor Evalution at material levelHi Gurus,
we have use
Object Name
Field Short Text Data Element
/ Field Type Field Length Additional info
T001W-WERKS Plant WERKS_D CHAR- 4 Mandatory
MARA-MATNR Material MATNR CHAR-18 Mandatory
LFA1- LIFNR Account Number of Vendor LIFNR CHAR-10 Non-Mandatory
S068- SPMON Period to analyze - month SPMON NUMC-6 Mandatory
S068-ART Inspection Type QPART CHAR-8
S068- LIFNR Vendor Account Number ELIFN CHAR-10
S068-KLASSE_A Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class A QKLASSE_A INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_B Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class B QKLASSE_B INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_C Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class C QKLASSE_C INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_D Absolute Frequency of Quality Score Class D QKLASSE_D INT4-10
S068-KLASSE_E Absolute Frequency of Quality Score
Class E QKLASSE_D INT4-10
S068-ZHLSELECT Number of Summarized Inspection Lots (Without Cancellation) QZHLSELECT INT4-10
QMEL-QMART Notification Type QMART CHAR-2
QMEL-QMDAB Date for Notification Completion QMDAB DATS-8
S012-SPMON Period to analyze - month SPMON NUMC-6
S012-LIFNR Vendor Account Number ELIFN CHAR-10
S012-WERKS Plant EWERK CHAR-4
S012-MATNR Material Number MATNR CHAR-18
S012-REWRT Invoice Amount MC_REWRT CURR-15
score wtg M all this are getting calculated from elbp, t147i,t147e, t147c
in elbp table vendor is there
from where I will get the materia? -
Sample report on QM (Vendor performance rating)
Hi ,
I need a sample format of a QM report (preferably 2 to3 small reports on a same page) on vendor performance rating.Please suggest as to which is the best method to have multiple queries in same page.I have 4 reports on vendor performance based on cost,Quality,Delivery and management which i want on the same page in the report.
pawanHi you can create a workbook and include number of the reports that you need .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/Helpdata/EN/33/746e393cf65c1ae10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards. -
Need extra option in Vendor Performance rating in LOV
For the vendor performance rating, at present we are having two options
1.Accepted &
2.Rejected..
we need one additional option Partially approved..
plz let me know how to include the additional option.
regards ,
PrabhuHai,
i couldn't find "ERT Results Action" can u kindly tell me the menu path..
Thank you. -
Vendor delivery rating for scheduling agreements
Dear All,
I need to check vendor delivery rating for sch. agreements. Mc$6 is not usefull because of sch. lines it works fo Po's. please suggest me how to get this.
Regards
MSRHi,
Vendor delivery rating is calculated via the formula actual delivery date (in me38) -statistical deliver date( in me38)/ statistical delivery date. points need to be maintained for ratio which is calculated in the above case in the path spro -materials management-purchasing -vendor evaluation-maintain purchase organisation data-points for automatic criteria
after which execute the t code me63 for automatic valuation
Regards
Sandeep -
Stock provided to vendor Quality inspection Stock
Hi
can any expert please Explain what is use of subcontractor inspection stock ,how the movement takes place between Stock provided to vendor unrestricted use & Stock provided to vendor Quality inspection if Iwanted to move between this two location how can i activate the QM ?Hi,
I think you can not move the inspection stock in your plant to inspection stock provided to vendor.
Regards,
Prashant -
Vendor Quality Certificate - upload to R/3
Dear Guys,
Here is my Quick Question
The scenario is like this, the client Receive the Quality certificate from the vendor , for the purchased materials as Hard copy
The client wants to scan the Vendor Quality certificate and upload to sap
shall i develop new transaction code to upload those certificate to optical archive
or there available any sap standard transaction if yes please let me know is there any config to be done
Thanks
RajAs per my Knowledge there is not any standard transaction to upload certificate ,so you must crate new transaction for this
-
Help/Info regarding the CL rating of RAM upgrades.
I'm upgrading my Early 2011 Macbook Pro 17 to 8GB Ram and I'm curious if anyone can offer advise regarding the CL rating. All the DDR3 1333GHz SODIMM kits have a CL9 rating. Is this a higher latency than the 4GB of ram that I have already? If so, will more latency actually do more harm than good??
Pardon me if I sound like a noob!
I'm running a stock MBP 17 8,1 2.2GHz i7 with Windows 7 Pro Bootcamp. (Windows & + Zone Alarm = 50% RAM usage when using Excel, UGH!)No, CL9 is a standard. I have the same model and put 8G from Omni Technologies in mine. It screams!
17" 2.2GHz i7 Quad-Core MacBook Pro 8G RAM 750G HD + OCZ Vertex 3 SSD Boot HD -
Regarding Vendor Rating.
Pls any one can help me how to capture Vendor Rating for Quality.
I have the requirement for accepted with Deviation.
if accepted it is considered as 100 score
if rejected it is consideredsas 1 score
but it the Lot size is some thing more Then One.
Here, let us assume that Lot size is 10 no's
out of which i accepted 4 No's
and rejected 3 No's
and accpeted with Deviation is 2.
and 1 No's is in Hold.
what should be the score and UD code.
i mean to say is i want to Decide the Q Score according to the Vendor and Quatity posted .
pls help me
thanks in advance.
Kumar.Hi
A quality score can be derived from the:
Usage decision
Share of defects in the lot
Share of defects for the characteristics
Quality score for the characteristics
You can use share of defects in the lot procedure .AssignQ score procedure " quality score from share of scrap" in material master
This procedure calculates the quality score using the share of scrap in the inspection lot:
I_KQD_MAX Share of scrap
E_KQD = I_KQD_MAX * (--) ** (-(--
- 1) ** 2)
Limiting val. Predef. share
with I_KQD_MAX Maximum QSc from vendor evaluation
Limiting value Lower limit for good quality in QM
Share of scrap Estimated share of scrap in inspection lot
Predef. share Predefined share of scrap from QM
inspection data
If it does not meet your requirement, create your own function module ,create new Q score procedure in spro and assin new function module to this procedure.
Sanjay -
Regarding Incoming quality certificate from vendor
Hi Experts ,
Please explain me with steps how the certificate process is carried out for both in outgoing & incoming case.
REgards
vivekHi vivek,
For Out Going Certificate.......
You need to maintain a Certificate Profile (QC01)
Assign the material to created COA profile. (QC15/QC16)
Then run trx QC21 to take print out of COA, now system will pick the result for the inspection lot,(you have enter in the selection layout for QC21 initial screen). for all those MICs that you have attached to the profile.
For In coming COA.
Maintain the QM in Procurement data in the QM view MM.
Define the certificate type the vendor furnishes with the delivery, in Q info record (QI01).
Regards,
Shyamal -
Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score
Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
SauravDear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm -
Upload vendor quality certificate to inspection lot
Hello,
I want to know the procedure to upload the vendor certificate to inspection lot in detail.
I have gone throught SAP library but didn't get much out of it.
Please explain me step by step process.
MimiriRefer to SAP help portal about quality certificate for goods receipt
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/90/cff086e36711d1954300a0c930e04c/content.htm
In the material master
-'QM in procurement' is active
-A control key with certificate requirement is set
-A certificate type is specified
You can upload the vendor certificate to inspection lot through transaction QC51.
Regards
Luke -
Vendor Evaluation / Rating
All SAP Gurus,
I want to evaluate number of vendors (but not all) at a time, how it can be done?
Regards,Hi Ranjan,
Vendor Evaluation component helps you select sources of supply and facilitates the continual monitoring of existing supply relationships. It provides you with accurate information on prices, and terms of payment and delivery.
The standard SAP System offers you a scoring range from 1 to 100 points, which is used to
measure the performance of your vendors on the basis of five main criteria.
We can determine and compare the performance of your vendors by reference to their overall
scores.
The main criteria available in the standard system are:
Price
Quality
Delivery
General service/support
These four main criteria serve as a basis for evaluating vendors from whom you procure materials.
External service provision
This main criterion serves as a basis for evaluating those vendors you employ as external service providers.
The first thread in MM contains a Pdf on Vendor Evaluation which gives a complete infromation
Hope this basic infromation helps you out
In case of any further clarification do get back
Please reward in case if you find this information is found useful
Thanks & regards
Pavan -
Regarding Vendor wise ALV Display
Dear All,
I am working on a report which has different fields like vendor , Doc No., Date, Amount. I am able to display all these fields for all the vendors in single alv grid. I want the report to display all these fields vendor wise in diffent Alv grid. Foe e.g.,
Vendor Code: 111111
Vendor Name : xyz ltd.
Doc no . Date Amount
11 01.05.2010 50000
12 02.05.2010 10000
Vendor Code: 222222
Vendor Name : pqr ltd.
Doc no . Date Amount
13 03.05.2010 5000
14 04.05.2010 1000
Pls, suggest any good Solutions.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandip SonarThank U sandeep,
But I want the list for all the vendors entered in selection-screen.
Thanks again,
Sandip Sonar
Maybe you are looking for
-
How many usb drives to install windows 8.1
Hi! I hope that someone can help answer my question. I need to install windows on my laptop. It is an Air with 4gb ram and 256g drive from 2011. So, I tried to download windows to my mac but that didn't work. The windows store only allows downloadi
-
Is TREX required for the customer specific catalog views in SAP ERP E-com
Hi gurus, I see there are few ramp-up sap notes for enabling the customer specific catalog views of Product catalog in SAP ERP E-commerce scenario. Any one who has already implemented them know if TREX is mandatory for having catalog views? specifica
-
Would this be a good idea for saving some space on 1st drive?
I have sort of run out of space on my original drive until i can get more RAM so that it may stop spinning beach balls.. the space taken up is nowhere near the max, but it's obvious I need to speed it up a bit, asi can here the processor working over
-
Printing PDF's I can't print anymore
When I try and print anything in pdf it let's me pick a printer. When the printing window opens and I hit print, it goes to "print to file" and won't print. It's only on one computer. I have other computers and everything works fine. On this computer
-
Adobe Customer Service had drastically deteriorated in the past few years.
I have worked in IT for more than 25 years. In this period I have seen Adobe's customer service deteriorate dramtically. Technology it is now made it possible to have tech support and customer service agents any place in world, which usually means t