Regarding video performance.

Hi,
I bought a MSI P7N SLI Platinum 750i chipset based motherboard Sn. 010B0807485693. After 8 months the board would not post, i.e. no display on the monitor even though the Harddisk LED and the CPU fans would run.
Handed over the motherboard to Microport, they sent it to Smartlink Network Systems Limited RMA Center N.R. Road Bangalore, I had to call up about 25 times to Smartlink and they took one month to give a replacement with the MSI P7N SLI Sn. 601-7380-010B0803214616. Got it on 18/9/2009.
The motherboard which I got from Smartlink is much older, as can be seen from the serial numbers. The video quality, i.e. clarity, color as well as frame rates are very bad compared to the original motherboard that I had.
I now know that the original motherboard never had a problem, only the technician at the Microport, Bangalore shop had delibrately not plugged in the power cord for the 9600 gt graphics card and unnecessarily made me RMA my motherboard.
I want to know if the older boards (of the same model i.e. MSI P7N SLI 750i platinum) used a different technology than the new motherboards have?
Is there a way to improve the video performance on my computer with this older motherboard.
Thanks.

All I can say about it is that, as far as I know, the P7N you got back, shouldnt be slower then the one you send in, they should be identical in setup/build.
I have the P6N platinum and the only difference between your and my board is that yours is able to run 45nm C2Q and has 2, I believe, PCIe 2.0 slots, where as I have 2 PCIe 1.1 slots.
But that doesnt make mine a slow board either, with current setup, see my sig, I have 0 issues or performance problems.
If you can, first try different videodrivers, be sure to delete old ones with drivercleaner or such.
If that doesnt work, might try a fresh install on seperate disk/partition and see if that helps.
But if performance still is bad, I would take it back, in my opinion you should not get an older/slower board back if you rma your new one.

Similar Messages

Recent ML upgrade leads to widespread video performance issues.

Hello,
I recently took the leap to Mountain Lion and I'm starting to regret my decision. I have noticed a real drop off in video performance across the entire system.
Firstly, I came across a well documented issue with Final Cut Pro 7 video playback in the canvas. Playback is almost unusable due to introduced artifacts and tearing. However the video performance issues seem more wide spread than "unsupported software". I notice extremely rough image switching when I switch between workspaces, particularly on the second monitor. Also, when the screen saver kicks in and it swaps images, the same very klunky image swap is noticed on the second monitor. Also when the Reading List display is toggled in Safari, the remaining window slide left or right is not smooth at all, irrespective of what monitor it is on. There are other Safari rendering issues too, involving flickers, and other general video issues.
My machine is a mid-2010 Mac Pro, 6 core, 3.3GHz with 24GB of RAM and a 5870 graphics card. None of these issues were present in Lion.
I was wondering whether anyone else had noticed similar issues and if so, what if anything can be done about it.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Scott

This problem is not restricted to Leopard, 10.4.10 with QuickTime 7.3 is affected too. 10.4.11 doesn't show any improvements either. Yes, we need a fix for this... but one that solves this problem on Tiger as well, please.

K8TNEO2-F V2.0 sub-par video performance

K8TNEO2-F V2.0
I am wondering if anyone has this board and has any experience with less than stellar video performance ? Reason I am asking is I have been all through the bios while attempting to improve the video performance.
What has prompted this is that I had all the same components in another box with an intel setup . Processor was a prescott 3.4 gig with one meg cache, 2 gigs of dual channel pc 3200 ram, 2 74 gig raptors 16 meg cache in raid 0, soundblaster audigy 2,and a x1950 pro agp with 512 megs of ddr 3. The only things that are different in the new box is the mobo (K8TNEO2-F V2.0) and an opteron 175 dual core. OS install and all the driver installs went flawless so I am not sure whats going on . I have the latest drivers from MSI site along with the latest vid card drivers .
The same games that I had previously installed with the intel system are performing at or near 20 % less in regards to FPS. Every thing else is improved significantly with the new mobo and processor.
I am open to any suggestions or bios settings that may correct this problem.
thanks
Wrath

Quote from: HenryW on 30-August-07, 05:56:35
Click on "Profile" > left side "Modify Profile" > in the menu select "Forum Profile Information" then scroll down to "Signature" and enter info in the box.
Thanks mate, Im gonna blame it on being so late
Thanks everyone as I have figured it out being directly related to video card drivers *amn ATI Grrr. I reverted to an earlier driver I had stored on one of my network backup drives . Installed it , tweeked the card some (slight OC, enabled fast read and write) changed aperture in bios to 512 . Rebooted and fired up some of my favorite games and they are back to where they use to be and beyond . Im one happy camper as the upgrade was not in vain after all . Thanks again for the responses here and looks like I have found a new home

Satellite P100 PSPAD: Unable to update BIOS 3.8 and poor video performance

Hello,
I have absolute shoddy video performance on my machine as well as the fan on/off issues.
To add to my frustrations the WinPhlash programme included in BIOS version 3.8 dumps out when trying to flash giving a PHLASHNT.SYS unable to load message with various error codes associated with it (codes 5 and 147 depending on if I run the exe as it is extracted from the ZIP, or run the extracted files independantly).
I have checked all permissionings on the folder and I definately have full control - but still a generic "check your accounts, if you have no permissions please log in again!" message is displayed.
any help with my BIOS issue would be apreciated.
[Edited by: admin on 06-Jul-2007 11:10]

Hi,
I have had the same error message on P100 PSPADE and furthermore the laptop was no longer under control, neither by keyboard or by menu impossible to switch off. I have had to unplug and to remove the battery. Then impossible to switch on.
According to the local ASP the motherboard is KO (??) and the safest way to upgrade the bios was to boot from an USB floppy in DOS mode?
Sounds strange but be careful.
Regards

Regarding Reports performance

Hi All,
Now i am working in Production system.
How can i check the performance for reports.
How can i find the report performance is low/high?
Please let me know the details.
Thanks
Vasu.

Hi Vasu,
Use the search on the word "performance", you will got lot of answers which are related to queries.
There are lot of factrors involved regarding query performance :
1. Install BW stats and analyze the queries
2. Option of using aggregates is a good idea to consider
3. you can multi providers to do reporting for better query performance
4. Query Read Mode - Read when navigating and expanding hierarchies
5. Check if indices under ORACLE are degenerated. OSS Note 323090
OLAP Cache OSS Note # 456068
Also take a look to the OSS Note 567746 'Composite note BW 3.x performance: Query & Web' in which you can find all the info required...
Assign points if helpful
Bye
Dinesh

Flash video performance poor in Firefox 3 and other newer Gecko-based browsers; fails to detect mouse movement in full-s

Regardless of configuration, I have found Flash video
performance on Firefox 3 to be severely sub-par. Numerous visual
lags occur throughout a typical Youtube video as it cannot seem to
manage to maintain a steady frame rate. When in full-screen, mouse
movement is not detected, forcing me to click in a full-screen
Vimeo video in order to display its controls when I should have
only needed to move the mouse. I was informed that the technical
explanation for this is that Flash isn't triggering MouseEvents
other than MouseEVENT.CLICK.
In my tests, this behavior also occurred in Flashplayers 9
and 10 as well as with recent versions of other browsers that also
use the Gecko rendering engine, namely Camino, Flock and Songbird,
but not in Firefox 2. I was told by a Mozilla employee that this
issue can only be solved by Adobe.
This has forced me to use the Safari browser as my only
available work-around. I implore that these issues get resolved as
quickly as possible.

guys, im exactly experience the same issue here.. any
solution guys? tks in advantage..

Flash Video performance is horrible in Internet Explorer 11 & 10 Win7 64bit

Video performance is horrible with Internet Explorer 11 & 10 on a Win7 64bit system.
Flash Player version 12.0.0.70
The video is choppy and stuttering and it's dropping frames no smooth playback is possible.
HTML5 Video playback is super smooth in IE 10 & 11.
ActiveX Shockwave Flash Add On is installed correctly and activated.
ActiveX filtering is off.
nvidia Video hardware (Quadro FX 2700M) drivers are current and up to date with the latest version 332.50
Tested with Flash hardware acceleration on and off = same problem
Tested with Internet Explorer hardware acceleration (software rendering) on and off = same problem
Any suggestions what the culprit may be?

What version of Internet Explorer are you using?

Do they have 2011 american idol contestants live video performances?

Every year, iTunes had American Idol Contestants' live video performances to purchase, as well as, just the song. I cannot find that for this year, 2011.
Would appreciate any help!

The songs from this season are offered as singles. The first icon for each week is the album and the singles are the next icons. I am not sure why you aren't seeing this on the AI downloads page on ITunes. It shouldn't be a problem. If you are having trouble, try searching for the contestants name whose single you want to download.
Message was edited by: PJReid

Conky affects video performance while refreshig itself?

Hi,
today I've installed conky and configured it to run with some basic configuration fond here http://conky.sourceforge.net/screenshots.html.
Happy with new fancy stuff installed on my system I've ran VLC to watch some movie. Unfortunately it came out that conky - while refreshing itself - affects video performance really badly. So badly that some stuttering on VLC is visible. In other words playback is no more smooth.
But just to have a proof I checked glxgears. Having conky turned on I had something like 40 FPS less (lack of smooth animation every time conky was refreshing its status was also easy to notice).
So - is just mine configuration broken or it's conky's fault? I don't believe that no one noticed this problem before.
I have nVidia Quadro NVS 140M and using nvidia-304xx drivers.
Last edited by jakub (2014-11-03 23:58:30)

that shouldn't happen, unless maybe if you ran it on really slow system with no gfx acceleration whatsoever.
Or if you were running some heavy script every time conky refreshes.
It might be a good idea to post the actual config you're using..

Seeking input regarding video card contribution to performance

I have the option of moving from a single Nvida graphics card 9600GT to a SLI combination dual card GTS 240 with 1 Gb memory in each card.
I understand this configuration is more appropriate for gaming, it would seem that the additional card performance would contribute to the performance of the editing platform. I used Premier CS4 exclusively.
I am fortunate enough to also be in a position to acquire a GTX 280 single card capable of SLI but I will only be able to use the single card. It too as 1Gb of memory but tremendous graphical power over the GTS 240 but again, since these cards are primarily aimed at the high end gaming appllications, would the performance increase not provide a benefit to me in Premier Pro and when transcoding?
Much thanks for input

Absolute waste of money. You will not notice any performance improvement.
The only thing that may help during encoding is when you ONLY encode to H.264 AND get a $ 1700 nVidia CX card. Price/perfomance wise your best option is either to keep your 9600 or get an ATI HD4890 card. The performance gain will be small, so the first option, keeping the 9600, seems the best.

Regarding Vendor Performance....

hii experts,
I am working on Vendor Performance report and finding problem in it.pls tell how can i analyse Vendor Performance report . what is the purpose of it? tables used . if possible give sample coding for this .
Any pointer will be highly appreciable..
Thanks in advance,
Ashok

Hi Ashok,
 I have worked on Vendor performance and i am sending you
 the code as per your requirement.....
 Hope this will help you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
REPORT ZVENDOR_PERFORMANCE.
TABLES: lfa1, lfm1, j_1inewjcode.
*STRUCTURES
DATA: BEGIN OF wa_lfm1,
lifnr LIKE lfm1-lifnr,
ekorg LIKE lfm1-ekorg.
DATA: END OF wa_lfm1.
DATA: BEGIN OF wa_lfa1,
lifnr LIKE lfa1-lifnr,
txjcd LIKE lfa1-txjcd,
adrnr LIKE lfa1-adrnr .
DATA: END OF wa_lfa1.
DATA: BEGIN OF wa_lfb1,
lifnr LIKE lfa1-lifnr,
bukrs LIKE t001-bukrs.
DATA: END OF wa_lfb1.
DATA: it_lfa1 LIKE wa_lfa1 OCCURS 10 WITH HEADER LINE,
it_lfm1 LIKE wa_lfm1 OCCURS 10 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA jcode LIKE j_1inewjcode-txjcd.
DATA count TYPE i.
DATA: new_lfa1 LIKE wa_lfa1 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : it_adrc LIKE adrc OCCURS 10 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : bukrs LIKE t001-bukrs, porg LIKE t024e-ekorg.
DATA: it_lfb1 LIKE wa_lfb1 OCCURS 10 WITH HEADER LINE.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK block1 WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
PARAMETERS:
p_bukrs LIKE t001-bukrs OBLIGATORY,
p_ekorg LIKE t024e-ekorg OBLIGATORY MEMORY ID buk.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK block1.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK block2 WITH FRAME TITLE text-002.
SELECT-OPTIONS: p_lifnr FOR lfm1-lifnr.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK block2.
PARAMETERS: test AS CHECKBOX DEFAULT 'X'.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON p_bukrs.
SELECT SINGLE j_1ibukrs FROM j_1iindcus
INTO bukrs
WHERE j_1ibukrs = p_bukrs.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE e128(8i).
ENDIF.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON p_ekorg.
SELECT SINGLE ekorg INTO porg FROM t024e
WHERE ekorg = p_ekorg
AND bukrs = bukrs.
IF sy-subrc NE 0 .
MESSAGE e015(me) WITH p_ekorg space.
ENDIF .
*-------header print.
TOP-OF-PAGE.
NEW-LINE NO-SCROLLING.
FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING INTENSIFIED ON.
WRITE : / ,
05 'Vendor', "#EC NOTEXT
22 'New Jud Code'." 38 'Old Jud code'.
FORMAT COLOR OFF.
NEW-LINE SCROLLING.
START-OF-SELECTION.
Get the dummy Jur Code
SELECT SINGLE txjcd FROM j_1inewjcode
INTO jcode
WHERE aland = 'IN'.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE e000(8i) WITH 'Jur code not defined in Table J_1INEWJCODE'.
ENDIF.
CHECK for lfB1 if the customer exists for company code
SELECT lifnr bukrs FROM lfb1 INTO TABLE it_lfb1
WHERE
lifnr IN p_lifnr
AND bukrs = p_bukrs.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE e000(8i) WITH 'No vendors defined for company code'.
ENDIF.
Check if vendor defined for purchasing
SELECT lifnr ekorg FROM lfm1 INTO TABLE it_lfm1
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_lfb1[]
WHERE lifnr = it_lfb1-lifnr
AND ekorg = p_ekorg.
Get data from General data of vendor master
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE e000(8i) WITH 'No Vendors defined for purchasing organization '.
ENDIF.
SELECT lifnr txjcd adrnr FROM lfa1 INTO TABLE it_lfa1
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_lfm1[]
WHERE lifnr = it_lfm1-lifnr.
SORT it_lfa1 BY txjcd.
DELETE it_lfa1[] WHERE txjcd = space.
SELECT * FROM adrc INTO TABLE it_adrc FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_lfa1
WHERE addrnumber = it_lfa1-adrnr.
CLEAR count.
LOOP AT it_lfa1.
IF test <> 'X'.
UPDATE lfa1 SET txjcd = jcode
WHERE lifnr = it_lfa1-lifnr.
ENDIF.
count = count + 1.
WRITE : / , 5 it_lfa1-lifnr, 25 jcode.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT it_adrc.
IF test <> 'X'.
UPDATE adrc SET taxjurcode = jcode
WHERE addrnumber = it_adrc-addrnumber.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
IF test <> 'X'.
WRITE : / 'The No of Vendor Master updated with new Jur Code is:',
count.
ENDIF.
"Kindly reward points if answer is useful"
Regards,
mandeep.

Regarding the performance in report

Hi Abap Gurus,
i am working on the report. my requirement is that after executing the report data gets extracting after 11 hours.the required data is comonf perfectly. how to improve the performance. any tips to follow the performance in the report. if possible post the code.
Moderator Message: Please search the forum for available information.
Edited by: kishan P on Oct 19, 2010 4:50 PM

Hi,
Please check below thread;
Extract from ALV List
Regards
Jana

Regarding Imporving performance

Hi All
I am fetching data into a database table but in that table there is no primary key then how i can impove the performace .
can u please tell me step
Moderator message - Please see Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum before posting - post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jun 30, 2009 10:26 AM

Be more specific when posting a question.
Tell us the scenario and the tables involved in your program.
Always have a habit of searching the forum before posting a question.
Regards
Karthik D

Regarding Application Performance

Hi,
I am developing the application using JSF Framework. For AJAx functionality I used a seperate servlet and for some other purpose I want to create one more servlet. Is there any problem in Performance if we keep on creating servlets in the application.
I need a suggestion regarding the number of servlets we can create in an application, so that the performance of the application can't be get down.

Try google.
However for the most part the performance is not related to the application/web server that you use.
It more depends on
- the machine you are running it on
- what code you are running on it.
With regards to "best", you can debate that forever.
Tomcat is widely used, mainly because it is free. But it is solid.

Regarding Query Performance.

Please tell me ..
How can i check the performance of query using index and without using index?

Hi,
As deepak said, query with and without index.
to get the cost and access path of the query get explain for the query. Read the Oracle docs
[http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/ex_plan.htm]
It is common to all the version from 9i as far as I know.
do
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> run your query
you will get the explain plan and cost information in the sql prompt if the statistis_level is set to typical or all
Regards,
Vijayaraghavan K
Edited by: Vijayaraghavan Krishnan on Jan 18, 2010 4:24 PM

Regarding video performance.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for