Regex syntax for resource filters

Hi,
I'm defining an index management crawler with scope resource filters. What is the syntax for URL regular expressions used here?
Looking at the examples on http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/12/47833ceb3da02ce10000000a114027/frameset.htm I don't assume it's PCRE, is it?
Regards,
Oliver

Hi Oliver,
Take a look at this thread:
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=2189321&messageID=2172830
Hope this helps!
-StephenS

Similar Messages

What is the SYNTAX for the user and group filters??? Is the HTML Ampersand token Amper A m p semicolon required in the filter

There seems to be quite a bit of confusion over the actual syntax for the user and group filters on the Forms Based Authentication Ldap Role and membership providers.. MSFT isn't really clear and there is a universal confusion in the blogsphere.
I the filters should the prefix be the ACTUAL Ampersand or the HTML token for an AMPERSAND.. I realize the in many cases the blogger might have inadvertently specified the html token when the bare naked ampersand was intended.. The question
therefore is : can a filter be taken directly from and ADSIEdit query and used as a filter or must the filter be made HTML safe by swapping out the AMERSAND with the HTML Token for AMERSAND before putting it into the configuration
for the LDAPRole/membership provider...
All science is either physics or stamp collecting

Hi GUYO,
I am not quite sure how we implement this on sharepoint side, as I did research and sharepoint may not have this feature to do this.
most of the LDAP for sharepoint may need to follow these steps in this article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee806890(v=office.15).aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sridhara/archive/2010/01/07/setting-up-fba-claims-in-sharepoint-2010-with-active-directory-membership-provider.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaevans/archive/2013/01/31/configuring-ldap-for-fba-in-sharepoint-2010-or-sharepoint-2013-with-powershell.aspx
here is an example :
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sharepoint__cloud/archive/2011/12/20/achieving-fba-with-adlds-amp-sharepoint-2010.aspx
if should this questions was at the ADSIEdit part, perhaps you can help us by opening a new thread at the AD foum
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?category=windowsserver
Regards,
Aries
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Fill-down function not working for resources.

Hi,
I am running P6 version 8.2 and I am trying to use the 'fill-down' function to copy resources down for certain filtered activities but the option is always greyed out.
I can fill down just about anything else but for some reason it doesn't work with resources.
Can anyone fill me in on why this may be..?
Thanks.
Russell.

You can't use fill down on any column that is a list. Predecessors, Successors, Resources, Roles and Activity Codes can all be assigned to multiple activities by highlighting them, right clicking and going to Assign. This will bring up a window where you can choose what to assign.
I am not 100% sure on why you can't use fill down with resources but I imagine its because you are doing more than editing a value for each activity. You are linking an activity to a resource, each of which are objects in the database.

Question on syntax for role portion (LH side) of the credential

I am concerned about syntax for the role portion (the stuff to the left of the "@" sign). Specifically, what are the illegal characters? Can I use dashes and periods? And I presume I can intermix alpha and numeric characters, and I need to know if that's not the case.
Thanks,
Rob

That's a little complicated ... there are multiple layers to consider.
Firstly, recall where credentials go ... they go in iTunes U URL (URI) query component. WIthin the query component of any URI, certain characters are reserved. Those characters are:
From RFC 2396:
The query component is a string of information to be interpreted by
the resource.
query = *uric
Within a query component, the characters ";", "/", "?", ":", "@",
"&", "=", "+", ",", and "$" are reserved.
So you'll want to avoid those characters outright. In addition, there are characters that are not allowed (or have special meanings within) any URI (again I refer you to RFC 2396).
My suggestion would be to apply the same rules as would apply to a variable within most programming languages ... you're safest if you stick to alphanumerics and the underscore, start with an alphabetic character.
Recall, too, that while you use roles in whatever way makes most sense for your site, the intention is to use that slot as, well, a "role" ... you should be able to define that simply, in most cases, without the need for special characters. A "role" would be something like "Student" or "Instructor" or "Visitor" or "Guest" or "Actor" or "Producer" or "Editor" or "Dean" or "VideoProductionAssistant" or "Administrator" ... think of a role not so much as who somebody "is" within iTunes U, rather think of it as the place to describe what a person "does" within iTunes U. I suspect ... and I could be wrong ... but I suspect that the reason you're asking about special characters is because you want to create a role-per-user at your site ... and you want to make sure your rules for usernames will map to what's allowed in the role slot.

Cisco Content Engine for Content Filtering

Hi All,
I am looking for a low end solution for Content Filtering and would like to use Cisco Content Engine.
1. The documentation said that Websense, Secure Computing SmartFilter (does not require separate SmartFilter) & N2H2 support is there on the CE. I used configurator on CE 510, but it did not give me option for any of those. I would appreciate any input in this regard.
2. Also, I assume that once I get a Content Engine, I don't need to use Microsoft Proxy any more, please confirm.
regards,
Ahmer Ghazi

You would have to Install the Smartfilter software on the Content engine that would work with the ACNS software running on the CE. SmartFilter software operates inside your network to control user access to external Internet resources and allows you to restrict access to World Wide Web pages, newsgroups, and FTP sites.
For more details refer:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/webscale/uce/acns41/smrtfltr/sf_chap1.htm
The Content Engine does the job of storing content locally and serving it to the users, so you would not need to use the Microsoft Proxy.

Web.Xml Mapping For using Filters in Servlets

Hi Team
Can any one help me in getting the correct xml mappiing for using filters
Currently i am getting 404 error when calling any resource
using the below mapping
<web-app>
<display-name>OM</display-name>
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>Hello.html</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
<filter>
<filter-name>Basic Filter</filter-name>
<filter-class>BasicFilter</filter-class>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>Basic Filter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/sample1</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>sample2</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>com.ustri.xml.FilteredServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>sample2</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/sample1</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
</web-app>
Thanks
santhosh

As the messages tries to suggest, the elements under <web-app> must appear in a specific order. In particular the <filter> elements, if any, must appear before any <session-config> elements. That isn't the case in what you posted so it fails validation by the DTD.

Analytic Services: Syntax error loading filters

Hi, I use Hyperion Essbase 7.1.0 on Windows Intel. I constantly getting error message when building cubes. ============== error message ============= [Mon Jul 16 05:16:21 2007]localhost///biadmin/Error(1054013) Syntax error loading filters - operation canceled ========================================== Interesting is that error is not accuring every time I build the cube. For example at night when script is executed by scheduler it reports error, but at the morning when I manualy execute script it executes without any error. I have figured out that this error is only happening at ASO cubes. Any help is greatly appreciated. Can someone point me to the error messages book. What should I do to overcome this errors? Thanks, Grofaty

Here is a case on Hyperion's esupport relating to the error message. We cycle all our Hyperion services nightly before we begin our nightly runs. Hope this helps. I love the "cough" reasoning! Solution ID: hyp71264 Here is the solution: Error: "1054013 Syntax Error loading Filters" There are a few possibilities for this message: An invalid filter applied. Verify that all filters are correct There was some sort of network "cough" where the client loses connection with the server. This is so short that the enduser probably did not even notice it, though Essbase has. Stopping and starting the Essbase server usually resolves this error You may also see this after an abnormal termination of an application Here is the problem or goal: Error: "1054013 Syntax Error loading Filters" Error connecting to Essbase server

Request MDX syntax for BOE XI3.0 and SAP BI7

Hi,
Does anyone know that where I can find a document to specify the MDX syntax that can be used for BOE XI3.0 and SAP BI7?
I found a related topic on:
Resources for customizing SAP Universe objects with MDX
But after go through the above thread, the feeling is that we can only get the answer by testing each of the syntax.
Could anyone share any ideas to this topic?
Thanks and regards
nora

Hi Ingo,
Here is the example that customer gave:
Per you request, a real example. The following objects were created,
when an universe was set up against a BEx Query:
Notation A: [0LOCNOTA].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTA].[Value]
Notation B: [0LOCNOTB].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTB].[Value]
Notation C: [0LOCNOTC].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTC].[Value]
Notation D: [0LOCNOTD].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTD].[Value]
User Status: [0LOCUSTA].[LEVEL01].[20LOCUSTA].[Value]
Want to be able to create an object, CFact, defined in the universe as
(shown in Oracle syntax here, but of course we have a SAP OLAP
universe thus our request for a MDX syntax for BO and SAP BW/BEx Query):
decode([0LOCNOTA].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTA].[Value],'Y','FAIL;','')
||decode([0LOCNOTB].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTB].[Value],'Y','CDMN;','')
||decode([0LOCNOTC].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTC].[Value],'Y','BSFR;','')
||decode([0LOCNOTD].[LEVEL01].[20LOCNOTD].[Value],'Y','ERR;','')
||substr([0LOCUSTA].[LEVEL01].[20LOCUSTA].[Value],1,4)
Say, if values for the objects are 'Y', 'N', 'Y', 'N',
and 'INACESSIBLE', respectively, CFact would have the data
FAIL;BSFR;INAC
Hope the above provides you with enough detail.
thanks and regards
nora

Syntax for using a variable in an equation.

Hi all,
Simple question here. What is tha appropriate syntax for using a variable in a calculation equation. Specifically, I am taking an established curve fitting equation from my channels and trying to calculate it over a lineargenerated data set to extend the curve beyond the original data sample. Here is the small portion of script I have that will not work. Thanks for any help.
dim a,b,c
a = Data.Root.ChannelGroups(5).Channels("air consumption formula").Properties("ResultApprAnsatzCoef1").Value
b = Data.Root.ChannelGroups(5).Channels("air consumption formula").Properties("ResultApprAnsatzCoef2").Value
c = Data.Root.ChannelGroups(5).Channels("air consumption formula").Properties("ResultApprAnsatzCoef3").Value
Call Calculate("Ch(""[5]/Air Consumption LG"")= ""a"" + Ch(""[5]/LinearGenerated"")*""b""+""c""*ch(""[5]/LinearGenerated"")^2")

Hi Gloorious,
I am using diadem script. In my example above, for the equation, if I substitue a,b,and c with numerical values, the script runs just fine and the formula executes as desired. Is there a way to place the variables there instead as I have tried to do (I was hoping it was just a syntax issue) or do I have to approach it a completely different way?
This script will execute just fine:
Call Calculate("Ch(""[5]/Air Consumption LG"")= 4 + Ch(""[5]/LinearGenerated"")*5+6*ch(""[5]/LinearGenerated"")^2")
but this will not:
dim a,b,c
a = Data.Root.ChannelGroups(5).Channels("air consumption formula").Properties("ResultApprAnsatzCoef1").Value
b = Data.Root.ChannelGroups(5).Channels("air consumption formula").Properties("ResultApprAnsatzCoef2").Value
c = Data.Root.ChannelGroups(5).Channels("air consumption formula").Properties("ResultApprAnsatzCoef3").Value
Call Calculate("Ch(""[5]/Air Consumption LG"")= ""a"" + Ch(""[5]/LinearGenerated"")*""b""+""c""*ch(""[5]/LinearGenerated"")^2")

Database error"ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource"

Hi All,
I got dump as
Database error text........: "ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for
resource"
Internal call code.........: "[RSQL/RDUP/NRIV ]"
Please check the entries in the system log (Transaction SM21).
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was not caught
in
procedure "READ_NRIV" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
Can u ppl tell me how to get correct this?
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Jul 20, 2009 11:01 AM

Hi Bala,
Same type of dump we got when we trigger the DTP which in process chain to load data from DSO to Info cube. And the load had processed with 225 data package and at 164th data package we got this error and except 164th data package all data package processed successfully
And the request was red. So we had done processed manually by clicking the icon. So all its been green and successfully loaded.
So when you do process manual the particular data package which got failed will be process successfully

ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource CLOSE cursor

Hi,
I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
This is the error I encountered:
process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
My questions are:
*Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
- one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
- another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
*Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
*From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
Thanks,
Raf

Raf Serrano wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
This is the error I encountered:
process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
My questions are:
*Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
- one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
- another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
*Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
*From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
Thanks,
RafSELECT (without FOR UPDATE) statements are never involved in ORA-00060.
only DML statements throw ORA-00060 error

Getting deadlock detected while waiting for resource error for select Query.....

Hi all,
i am getting a below error whenever executing the below select query....
some times it will show dead lock detected while waiting for resource and terminated...
some times it executes and gives result..
but all the time it writes an alert to alert log
Plesae suggest how to resolve the issue..........
Thanks in advance
Env: Linux / Oracle 11.2.0.3.3
Error from alert log:
Errors in file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
Trace file info... bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
Trace file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/oracle/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
System name: Linux
Node name: bdrdb.cteplindia.com
Release: 2.6.18-308.el5PAE
Version: #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:40:09 EST 2012
Machine: i686
Instance name: bdrdb
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 92
Unix process pid: 6076, image: [email protected] (P017)
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SESSION ID:(423.59970) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** CLIENT ID:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SERVICE NAME:(bdrdb) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** MODULE NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
 ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011 92 423 S 33 128 S X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000 33 128 S 92 423 S X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126 session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23 session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
 ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011 92 423 S 33 128 S X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000 33 128 S 92 423 S X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126 session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23 session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
Rows waited on:
Session 423: no row
Session 128: obj - rowid = 00021DC1 - AAAh3BAAVAAAQL/AAA
(dictionary objn - 138689, file - 21, block - 66303, slot - 0)
----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
Session 128:
sid: 128 ser: 46176 audsid: 1836857 user: 102/DBLOCAL
 flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
 flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
pid: 33 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 31611
 image: [email protected]
client details:
 O/S info: user: masked, term: masked, ospid: 5924:568
 machine: masked program: Toad.exe
 application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
 application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
 B_USER_INFO,
 J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
 L_TEST_STATUS,
 L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
 j_op_test_anml
WHERE B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
 AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
 AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
 AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
 AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_00"
 AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (:"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02", :"SYS_B_03")
 AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_04"
 AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = :"SYS_B_05"
 AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN (:"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07", :"SYS_B_08")
 AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.916
dbkedDefDump(): Starting a non-incident diagnostic dump (flags=0x0, level=3, mask=0x0)
----- Error Stack Dump -----
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
----- SQL Statement (None) -----
Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
More......
Query:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
 B_USER_INFO,
 J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
 L_TEST_STATUS,
 L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
 j_op_test_anml
WHERE B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
 AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
 AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
 AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
 AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = 0
 AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (1, 2, 99)
 AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
 AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = 1
 AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN ('Scheduled', 'In-Progress', 'Completed')
 AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
 AND ( (j_op_test_anml.end_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
 AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
 OR (j_op_test_anml.start_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
 AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
 OR (TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
 AND j_op_test_anml.end_date)
 OR (TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
 AND j_op_test_anml.end_date))
 AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
 AND B_FP_TEST.DATASOURCE_ID = 9
Query Exp plan:
Plan hash value: 3398228788
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1501 | 102K| 1929 (1)| 00:00:24 | | | | | |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1501 | 102K| 1929 (1)| 00:00:24 | | | | | |
| 2 | CONCATENATION | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ30005 | 241 | 16870 | 800 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,05 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 5 | HASH JOIN | | 241 | 16870 | 800 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,05 | PCWP | |
| 6 | PX RECEIVE | | 246 | 15990 | 797 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,05 | PCWP | |
| 7 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30004 | 246 | 15990 | 797 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,04 | P->P | HASH |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 246 | 15990 | 797 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,04 | PCWP | |
| 9 | PX RECEIVE | | 573 | 29223 | 793 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,04 | PCWP | |
| 10 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30003 | 573 | 29223 | 793 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,03 | P->P | HASH |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 573 | 29223 | 793 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,03 | PCWP | |
| 12 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q3,03 | PCWC | |
| 13 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q3,03 | PCWP | |
| 14 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ30000 | | | | | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 16 | NESTED LOOPS | | 485 | 20855 | 781 (0)| 00:00:10 | | | | | |
| 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| J_OP_TEST_ANML | 485 | 10185 | 296 (0)| 00:00:04 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX$$_2D190001 | 485 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
| 21 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,03 | PCWC | |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,03 | PCWP | |
| 23 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q3,04 | PCWC | |
| 24 | PX RECEIVE | | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,04 | PCWP | |
| 25 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30001 | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
| 27 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q3,05 | PCWC | |
| 28 | PX RECEIVE | | 30 | 150 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,05 | PCWP | |
| 29 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30002 | 30 | 150 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 30 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 30 | 150 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
| 31 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 32 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 210 | 329 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
| 33 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 195 | 329 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
|* 34 | HASH JOIN | | 2 | 114 | 325 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
| 35 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 36 | NESTED LOOPS | | 6 | 258 | 322 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
| 37 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 6 | 126 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 38 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_OP_TEST_ANML | 6 | 126 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 39 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
|* 41 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 42 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 1 | 8 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 43 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | FI_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 44 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 45 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
| 46 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 47 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ20003 | | | | | | | Q2,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 48 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 49 | NESTED LOOPS | | 33 | 2310 | 399 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
|* 50 | HASH JOIN | | 33 | 2145 | 397 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 51 | PX RECEIVE | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 52 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ20002 | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,02 | P->P | HASH |
|* 53 | HASH JOIN | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,02 | PCWP | |
| 54 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q2,02 | PCWC | |
| 55 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q2,02 | PCWP | |
| 56 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ20000 | | | | | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 57 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 58 | NESTED LOOPS | | 66 | 2838 | 382 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | | | |
| 59 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 60 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_OP_TEST_ANML | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 61 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 62 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
| 63 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,02 | PCWC | |
|* 64 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,02 | PCWP | |
| 65 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q2,03 | PCWC | |
| 66 | PX RECEIVE | | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 67 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ20001 | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 68 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 69 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
|* 70 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 71 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 72 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10003 | | | | | | | Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 73 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 74 | NESTED LOOPS | | 33 | 2310 | 399 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
|* 75 | HASH JOIN | | 34 | 2210 | 397 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 76 | PX RECEIVE | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 77 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10002 | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,02 | P->P | HASH |
|* 78 | HASH JOIN | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | |
| 79 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWC | |
| 80 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | |
| 81 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10000 | | | | | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 82 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 83 | NESTED LOOPS | | 66 | 2838 | 382 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | | | |
| 84 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 85 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_OP_TEST_ANML | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 86 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 87 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
| 88 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWC | |
|* 89 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | |
| 90 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 91 | PX RECEIVE | | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 92 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10001 | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 93 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 94 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
|* 95 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
 5 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
 8 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
11 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
18 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
19 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
20 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
 "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
22 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
26 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
30 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
34 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
38 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
 LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
39 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
40 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
 "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
41 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
42 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
43 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
44 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
45 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
50 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
53 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
60 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
 LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
61 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
62 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
 "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
64 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
68 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
69 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
70 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
75 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
78 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
85 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
 LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND
 (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
86 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
87 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
 "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
89 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
93 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
94 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
95 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)

Excellent piece of follow-up on my first suggestion.
I nearly made a comment about how the plan doesn't show Bloom filter pruning either - and then I realised why not. The plan you've shown us comes from Explain Plan with literal values present; the trace file shows bind variables with names that are generated when cursor_sharing is set to force or similar - so the run-time plan and the plan from explain plan are almost guaranteed to be different.
Oracle support will need you to supply the plan you get from trying to run the query and then making a call to dbms_xplan.display_cursor() - dbms_xplan in 10g | Oracle Scratchpad If you do this I think you'll find that the pstart/pstop columns contain entries like :BF0000, and you may even find operations link PX JOIN FILTER CREATE / PX JOIN FILTER USE
A couple of generic notes:
if a query does sufficient work to merit parallel execution, then it's usually better to supply the best possible information to the optimizer, which means using literals rather than bind variables - you could try executing the query with the hint /*+ cursor_sharing_exact */ to stop Oracle from turning your literals into binds; it might be the presence of bind variables that's making the optimizer choose a path that has to include bloom filter pruning in your case.
Where you have the to_date() call you've used a four-digit year - which is a very good thing and helps the optimizer - but it's also a good idea to include an explicit format string as well: with a four-digit year this probably won't make any difference, but it avoids any risk of ambiguity for the optimizer.
I made a comment about the P->S stage and bottlenecks - I spent a couple more minutes looking at the plan, and I see the optimizer has used concatentation: in effect it has run three query blocks one after the other and fed the results to the query co-ordinator - in this case the P->S would make no difference to the end-user response time there's always a final P->S to the coordinator, you just happen to have three of them.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

Sqlldr- ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

Hi Team,
My database version is 11.1.0.7.0. I am loading the data using sqlldr. I am getting the error ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource. once dead lock detected ,whether data will be rejected after commit point reached(Rows=100000). FYI information only sqllder is running on the database,it is getting completed withing 5-10min. please help me whether any other lock happening on this due to sqllder.
sqlldr userid=orcl/orcle control=".$controlfile." log=".$logfile.".log data=".$datafile." bad=".$badfile." discard=".$discardfile." Bindsize=19000000 Rows=100000 Readsize=20000000 Errors=1000000";
Thanks in advance

user9256814 wrote:
Hi Team,
My database version is 11.1.0.7.0. I am loading the data using sqlldr. I am getting the error ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource. once dead lock detected ,whether data will be rejected after commit point reached(Rows=100000). FYI information only sqllder is running on the database,it is getting completed withing 5-10min. please help me whether any other lock happening on this due to sqllder.
sqlldr userid=orcl/orcle control=".$controlfile." log=".$logfile.".log data=".$datafile." bad=".$badfile." discard=".$discardfile." Bindsize=19000000 Rows=100000 Readsize=20000000 Errors=1000000";
Thanks in advanceadditional clues will exist within alert_SID.ora file & subsequent trace file.

ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource with Tbs Read-only

Hi all,
We're using Oracle 10.2.0.1 and 9.2.0.4.
I'm testing the performing of a procedure that inserts, like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE P$TAD_TEST
IS
TYPE T_T1_C1 IS TABLE OF T1.C1%TYPE INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
TYPE T_T1_DT IS TABLE OF T1.DT%TYPE INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
P_C1 T_T1_C1;
P_DT T_T1_DT;
P_RESULT NUMBER;
BEGIN
FOR j IN 1..4032 LOOP
P_C1(j) := j;
P_DT(j) := SYSDATE + (j/24/60);
END LOOP;
FORALL i IN P_C1.FIRST..P_C1.LAST SAVE EXCEPTIONS
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (P_C1(i), P_DT(i));
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
P_RESULT := SQLCODE;
END;
The table T1 is partitioned across 10 tablespaces. The test consist to take
these tablespace read-only and perform the procedure, and analyze the results,
like erros.
but when I perform the procedure, The alert.log indicates the error
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource.
Why this occurs only the tablespaces are read-only?
thank you!!!!

Hi,
yesterday we got this error again(in fact twice) and we were able to get the trace file. It says this is NOT oracle error. i was wrong in suspecting Oracle. This is the trace file details. i dont know how to debug this. Any help appreciated.
*** 2010-06-15 16:24:29.243
*** ACTION NAME:() 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
*** MODULE NAME:(JDBC Thin Client) 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
*** SERVICE NAME: 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
*** SESSION ID:(482.4266) 2010-06-15 16:24:29.231
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-00300021-0000b52d 209 482 X 247 474 S
TX-002a0009-00011b24 247 474 X 209 482 S
session 482: DID 0001-00D1-0000000A session 474: DID 0001-00F7-00000008
session 474: DID 0001-00F7-00000008 session 482: DID 0001-00D1-0000000A
Rows waited on:
Session 474: obj - rowid = 0000CED4 - AAAM7UAAxAAAVgSAAA
(dictionary objn - 52948, file - 49, block - 88082, slot - 0)
Session 482: obj - rowid = 0000D8BF - AAANi/AAuAAB+z/AAA
(dictionary objn - 55487, file - 46, block - 519423, slot - 0)
Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
Session 474:
pid=247 serial=31796 audsid=25502259 user: 62/USER
O/S info: ....
program: JDBC Thin Client
application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
Current SQL Statement:
INSERT QUERY1
End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
Current SQL statement for this session:
INSERT QUERY2
Thanks,
AK

Syntax for Evaluate function in OBIEE

Hi
I have browsed through the docs but couldn't find syntax for Evaluate function. Could someone pass me the full syntax and if possible a helpful example against essbase.
Thanks

Hi
definitely
syntax:- EVAULATE('your db function(%1,%2)', parameter list)
here %1 and %2 are the no.of parameters (columns or may constant values) to be passed for the db-function
if you have 3 parameters then you need to use %3 also.. means the columns to be passed.
following exapmples are for ORACLE db,
ex1: EVALUATE('upper(%1)', 'kishore kumar') gives the result as -> KISHORE KUMAR
ex2: EVALUATE('upper(%1)', 'Markets.Region') here Markets.Region is column.
you also can call the user-defined functions through evaulate
EVALUATE('functioname(%1,%2), column1, column2)
the above function has 2 parameters to be inputted
Thanks & Regards
Kishore Guggilla
Edited by: Kishore Guggilla on Jan 16, 2009 11:00 PM

Regex syntax for resource filters

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for