Rejection mail

Hi gurus,
the initiator is not receiving  mail notification,after managers rejection,who rejected that manager is receiving notification.in send mail task agent as wfinitiator assinged.
i called terminating event for Approve and reject.
in reject outcome i called this send mail task for initiator's notification.but this not going to initiator , who has taken the reject decision that manager is receiving.
where is the problem?
Regards,
PS

Hello Pavan,
Check the below thread for similar issue,might be useful
Approval/Rejection of Access Request through email functionality not workin
Regards
Baithi

Similar Messages

  • Rejection Mail  to the Creator SOFM

    Hi ,
    I am Using  TS  20000139 to send the Rejection Mail . It going well but in the Subject i want the Employee Name should come in the text. It is not coming  properly.
    In Subject it coming like below.
    Reason for E-Payment Rejection for &BUS2089.TRAVELERNAME&
    &BUS2089.TRAVELERNAME& --> Instead it should pick the name dynamically.

    I think it will come like that only.. you will have to prepare the texts ina  seperate back ground task where you will concatenate the subject line in a string . and then pass on this string to DOCUMENTHEADER container element.
    Hope I am helpful enuf!
    regards,
    Anuj Sethi

  • Rejection mail in t-coce SOST

    Hi all,
    I am processing 50000041 approval workflow. if i reject the request, mail should go to requestor about rejection. But i am finding all rejection mails in t-code SOST, i am sending manually to respective requestor.
    Is there any way that rejection mail should go automatically to respective requestor?
    Please provide some inputs on this...
    Thanks

    Hi,
      The mails don't directly flow from SAP to the user's mailbox(outlook).  You need to check the following:
    1.  Is the exchange server of enabled to receive mails from your application server?
    2.  Is there a scheduled job (RSWUWFML) which sends work items/notifications?
    Regards,
    Aravinda Sarma M.

  • SPF IPv4 IPv6 Cross-Checking Bug - Producing PermError, Rejecting Mails

    Messaging Server SPF Query with IPv6 and IPv4 cross checking not skipped, but rather producing a PermError. This would reject a lot of incoming mails which have both ipv4 and ipv6 spf records published.
    I suspect that it is a bug.
    Linux:
    bin/imsimta version
    Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)
    libimta.so 7u4-27.01 64bit (built 08:50:46, Aug 30 2012)
    Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)
    Linux mx1.mathewsystems.com 2.6.18-028stab101.1 #1 SMP Sun Jun 24 19:50:48 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    Solaris x86:
    bin/imsimta version
    Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)
    libimta.so 7u4-27.01 64bit (built 08:47:11, Aug 30 2012)
    Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)
    SunOS COMM1 5.10 Generic_147441-01 i86pc i386 i86pc
    ./spfquery -i 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e -v gmail.com
    Running SPF query with:
    IP address: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    Domain: gmail.com
    Sender: [email protected] (local-part: postmaster)
    HELO Domain: gmail.com
    01:09:35.41: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    01:09:35.41: SPFcheck_host called:
    01:09:35.41: source ip = 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    01:09:35.41: domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.41: sender = [email protected]
    01:09:35.41: local_part = postmaster
    01:09:35.41: helo_domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.41:
    01:09:35.41: Looking up "v=spf1" records for gmail.com
    01:09:35.42: DNS query status: Pass
    01:09:35.42: "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com"
    01:09:35.42:
    01:09:35.42: Parsing modifier: "redirect = _spf.google.com"
    01:09:35.42: Processing macros in _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42: Returned: _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42:
    01:09:35.42: No match found, following redirect to _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42: Recursing into SPFcheck_host
    01:09:35.42: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    01:09:35.42: SPFcheck_host called:
    01:09:35.42: source ip = 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    01:09:35.42: domain = _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42: sender = [email protected]
    01:09:35.42: local_part = postmaster
    01:09:35.42: helo_domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.42:
    01:09:35.42: Looking up "v=spf1" records for _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.43: DNS query status: Pass
    01:09:35.43: "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com ?all"
    01:09:35.43:
    01:09:35.43: Parsing mechanism: " include : _netblocks.google.com"
    01:09:35.43: Assuming a Pass prefix
    01:09:35.43: Processing macros in _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.43: Returned: _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.43: Recursing into SPFcheck_host
    01:09:35.43: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    01:09:35.43: SPFcheck_host called:
    01:09:35.43: source ip = 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    01:09:35.43: domain = _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.43: sender = [email protected]
    01:09:35.43: local_part = postmaster
    01:09:35.43: helo_domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.44:
    01:09:35.44: Looking up "v=spf1" records for _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.44: DNS query status: Pass
    01:09:35.44: "v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ip4:173.194.0.0/16 ?all"
    01:09:35.44:
    *01:09:35.44: Parsing mechanism: " ip4 : 216.239.32.0/19"*
    *01:09:35.44: Assuming a Pass prefix*
    *01:09:35.44: +"ip4" not supported for IPv6; returning PermError+*
    +01:09:35.44:   Mechanism failed with PermError+
    01:09:35.44:
    01:09:35.44: SPFcheck_host is returning PermError
    01:09:35.45: Returned from recursion with status: PermError
    01:09:35.45: Returning with status: PermError
    01:09:35.45: Mechanism failed with PermError
    01:09:35.45:
    01:09:35.45: SPFcheck_host is returning PermError
    01:09:35.45: Returned from recursion with status: PermError
    01:09:35.45:
    01:09:35.45: SPFcheck_host is returning PermError
    01:09:35.45: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Mathew
    Edited by: 994254 on 15.03.2013 17:18

  • Sending mail with multiple dest., one is rejected - mail is rejected, why?

    Hello,
    I have a problem with my messaging server, while sending mails to multiple users, and one of them does not exist or is overquota.
    If one of the recipients gets rejected (email address does not exists or is overquota), the email is rejected (type J register) and no one receive it.
    any idea why messaging is doing this?
    The queue i'm using is configured like this:
    tcp_intranet notices 3 smtp nomx backoff "pt5m" "pt10m" "pt30m" subdirs 50 maxjobs 20 pool TCP_INTRANET_POOL recipient
    limit 256 maytlsserver maysaslserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth identnone noexquota
    tcp_intranet-daemonand the version of messaging
    imsimta version
    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)
    libimta.so 6.2-4.03 (built 04:14:30, Sep 22 2005)
    SunOS smtp07 5.9 Generic_118559-28 i86pc i386 i86pc
    root@smtp:/var/opt/SUNWmsgsr/config > thanks in advance
    Xavier

    xavierm wrote:
    If one of the recipients gets rejected (email address does not exists or is overquota), the email is rejected (type J register) and no one receive it.If an individual email account is overquota or an email address doesn't exist, only that RCPT TO: attempt for that individual address will be rejected -- this does not mean the email cannot be delivered to the valid recipients.
    It is up to the email client to determine how an individual rejected recipient address is handled, i.e. should it continue sending the email or give up and alert the user.
    any idea why messaging is doing this?This is how all efficient email servers operate. What is the email client that you are using to send the email?
    The queue i'm using is configured like this:
    tcp_intranet notices 3 smtp nomx backoff "pt5m" "pt10m" "pt30m" subdirs 50 maxjobs 20 pool TCP_INTRANET_POOL recipient
    limit 256 maytlsserver maysaslserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth identnone noexquota
    tcp_intranet-daemon
    The noexquota option does nothing on Sun Messaging Server:
    "Note that these options have no effect on delivery to Messaging Server mailboxes on any platform. "
    http://msg.wikidoc.info/index.php/Exquota%2C_noexquota%2C_holdexquota_Channel_Options
    You may however want to try the acceptalladdresses channel option:
    http://msg.wikidoc.info/index.php/Acceptalladdresses%2C_acceptvalidaddresses_Channel_Options
    Regards,
    Shane.

  • How to call Link in Rejection mail

    Hi Experts,
    When a Approver rejects a Shopping Cart, i am sending an email.In that email i wnat to send a link using which the user can login and directly open the shopping cart in change mode.
    How do i create that Link or how do i call a transaction ?
    Runal.

    there is one standard report available in the system which generates mails for the shopping cart approval.
    this report only considers workitems which are to be approved and sends them over to the relevant approvers.
    This is the case when the approvers has to approve the shopping cart , it will open link where the approver can approve ths shopping cart.
    you can change the same report to consider the rejected shopping carts and send over the links, but i am not sure what will open up when you click on this link
    report RSWUWFMLEC is used by the system to generates the mails
    Edited by: khan voyalpad usman on Sep 14, 2009 6:13 AM

  • Rejection Mail notification, Initiator not receiving

    Hi gurus,
    the initiator is not receiving mail notification,after managers rejection,who rejected that manager is receiving notification.in send mail task agent as wfinitiator assinged.
    i called terminating event for Approve and reject.
    in reject outcome i called this send mail task for initiator's notification.but this not going to initiator , who has taken the reject decision that manager is receiving.
    where is the problem?
    Regards,
    PS

    yap,its customized workflow, using same way Organization Object and Expression which has Workflow Initiator in the send mail step.
    starting with Event call and also for approve & rejections callling another events for terminating events
    through rejection terminating event not sending to initiator.
    I need to send Initiator's SAP INBOX only..no need to send their Emails(external inbox).
    Regards,
    PS
    Message was edited by:
            peter son

  • Rejection mail did not trggiered

    Hi,
    I am phasing the issue when approver rejects the Access Request, rejection notification event does not trigger and mail does not send to respected recipient. Although rejection notification event has been configured in stage
    Only END_OF_REQUEST notification event triggers and GRAC_USER get the mail.
    Please help me on that.
    Regards,
    Pavan

    Hello Pavan,
    Check the below thread for similar issue,might be useful
    Approval/Rejection of Access Request through email functionality not workin
    Regards
    Baithi

  • Forwarding rejected mail to internal recipient?

    I would like to forward all mail that is normally rejected by the mail gateway to a "junk" mail folder on the internal mail server. How would I acchieve this?
    Is this done by using a wildcard in the transport map or is there another method preferrable?
    The reason for this request is that I want to see what mail does no longer arrive at the internal mailboxes. Just in case my filtering is too narrow.
    TIA
    Hans

    If you edit main.cf manually look up "luser_relay"
    http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#luser_relay
    Ok. I had overlooked this. Thanks...
    You are mixing issues here. Mail to unknown users is
    one thing, mail to be fed to the spamfilter another.
    Don't worry about this until you actually turn on
    spamfiltering (which I'd turn on immediately). No
    reason why you shouldn't. If you are concerned about
    false positives, keep the settings "light".
    Well, the mail load is still rather light, less than 200 each day, so I simply use a catchall to collect copys of all incoming mail. I then add all spam, not filtered automatically, manually to the junk mail box of my copy of Apple mail. Everything else I simply put into the trash. This means I'm "collecting" spam to train the spam mechanism of the server. Hence this perhaps strange question...
    Furthermore (but that's my personal opinion), mail
    adressed incorrectly, should bounce back to the user
    so they know and can fix it. Besides, an enormous
    amount of incorrectly adressed mail comes from spam.
    I agree, so far we simply added new aliases. But now that we have the new server setup we have decided to slowly lock everything down tight. But for us this means we have to see what comes in with false addresses and then reply to the sender manually informing him of the correct address. Due to the low mailload this is still pretty simple. I would rather not try this later this year when the load has increased.
    http://www.postfix-book.com/
    I already bought this one, and Apache, and "DNS and Bind", and Kerberos and LDAP etc.
    I was more thinking in the line of "in general" for OS X server "Using the gui for beginners with examples and explanations" since Apple's documentation kind of ***** in some areas.
    For example I get an error when connecting Dreamweaver to my websites using webdav while FTP seems to work fine. Webav failes even though I defined realms and all that other stuff needed.
    And there are some other similar general problems I have encountered through time as with Kerberos Open Directory and LDAP.
    Somehow Apple's documentation seems to explain what to do, very often skipping the "how" and "why" and "what if" parts.
    Thanks again for your help.
    Hans

  • Mac OS X Server 10.4.7 wrongly rejecting mail based on incorrect RBL info

    On two separate servers in the past few weeks the mail servers have been rejecting messages saying the sender is listed on an RBL when this in not correct. Spamhaus and orbs are both listed as the source, but looking up the IPs in question, they are not listed. The only solution we have found so far is to disable the RBLs.

    If it happens again I will collect that information. I have since updated SpamAssassin and other updates and tried enabling the RBLs again and things are working fine since them. Must be related to this massive spam surge of recent months.

  • Reject mails content filter based (regex)

    How can I reject incoming mails based on a regex?

    Rejecting incoming emails where the envelope sender is in your own domain can help but if you have any roaming users it will likely end up being a problem unless they always connect over VPN. My experience has been that they will often try to use other ways to send email even if just as an expedient.
    You absolutely can reject spoofed envelope senders but these are based on basic rules rather than a regex. From the GUI menu select Mail Policies -> Mail Flow Policies and you can edit the settings for each mail flow policy. Each policy has a section at the bottom called "Sender Verification."
    You can reject based on three main criteria. The appliance does a DNS lookup on the domain in the envelope sender and can take action based on this.
    1) Malformed or partial envelope sender
        Example: Just a username with no domain at all
    2) Envelope senders where the domain does not resolve
       DNS returns temporary error. Could be all their DNS servers are unreachable.
       The appliance defaults to a 4xx 'try later' response.
    3) Envelope senders where the domain does not exist
        DNS returns NX Domain/Perm fail. Like if the roots say the domain does not exist.
        The appliance defaults to a 5xx "perm fail" response.
    I have tried for years to get Cisco/Ironport to add options where the MX resolves to something ridiculous like 127.0.0.1 or 1.1.1.1 but that has never flown since it would involve interpreting a DNS lookup versus just a go/no go result.Even just the three cases there are now can make a huge difference.
    Anyway, check the section titled "Sender Verification: Envelope Sender" in the AsyncOS configuration guide.for more information on these settings.
    The Advanced Configuration Guide details a fairly new feature (for Ironport) called SMTP Call-Ahead. It can go further by looking up the full email address but make sure that you understand the implications of this as it can result in your mail server being seen as doing excessive lookups and getting blocked, or worse, a DOS attack.

  • Outgoing mail server rejects mail

    Hello,
         My ISP's SMTP server started rejecting the outgoing mail I am trying to send through it.  I called them, but they checked the settings with me (which as far as I know had not changed).  They said they were OK and that I should call Apple.
    Does anyone know what would cause this  I restarted the computer and the modem/network completely.  It still does it.  I have a pc on the same network which is able to send mail through the same SMPT server, so it does seem like something on this mac maybe.  Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Bob

    Start here:
    Mail: Troubleshooting sending & receiving email messages

  • Rejecting mail password

    Hi,
    I just opened Mail and it gave me the following message:
    The POP server rejected the password for the user "X".
    Noting that I haven't changed my password and I've checked it on the mail website.
    What might be the problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Camille

    Blame it on a mis-sent byte of information when the POP server you were trying to use tried to authenticate your login information.
    You can click 'cancel', and try retrieving new mail again from within Mail by selecting Mailbox, Get new mail, and selecting the account in question. It will probably work the second time without re-entering your information.
    It happens to me all the time. I've aggregated six family email accounts on various free email providers services and MobileMe in Mail, and I get an event like that at least every week or two.
    In my experience, Apple seems to have recurring trouble with authentication servers used by Microsoft Live Mail (formerly Hotmail). Coincidence?

  • Rejected Mail Issue - Bad return address

    All,
    I am getting a small precentage of mail from my server returned with to my users with the error:
    Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused.
    The return address was '<[email protected]>'
    I cant find much more detail in the error logs, but Im assuming this mail is being rejected by the mail server of the intended recipient which is not in the same domain as mine. Is there anyway to verify which server is rejecting the mail? Is there anything I can do to fix this issue as both the sender and recipient are valid accounts. TIA>
    Pete Serafin

    I have looked in the headers, but there isnt anything that looks bad in them. I should also state that this issue is only on replies. Original emails sent to these addresses that are being bounced get through without any problem. Also and maybe more importantly, it is only on replies to certain domains ( such as AOL ). Any other ideas?

  • Rejected mail messages

    Hallo
    Recently I installed Sun Communication Suite with Messaging server included. I migrated to some test users to new installation and they report, that there are mail messages frequently rejected with explanation:
    Thu, 20 May 2010 19:50:21 +0200 (CEST)
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See [http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html]
    Error occured to webmail users and users with other mail clients. I searched for answer, but I still don't have I clue, how to change my mailer to avoid this.
    Regards
    Matej

    Output from imsimta version is:
    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)
    libimta.so 7u2-7.02 64bit (built 03:03:02, Apr 16 2009)
    Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)
    SunOS mailstore 5.10 Generic_138888-01 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120
    You are right. Delivery notice come later. Here is example of whole message.
    Message-id: <[email protected]>
    Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:50:18 0200+
    From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?=22Petja_Plau=A8tajner=22?=
    +<[email protected]>+
    To: Ana Filipov <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: dunaj
    Your message has been enqueued and undeliverable for 2 days to the following recipients:
    Recipient address: [email protected]
    Reason: unable to deliver this message after 2 days
    Delivery attempt history for your mail:
    Thu, 20 May 2010 19:50:21 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Thu, 20 May 2010 11:50:20 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Thu, 20 May 2010 03:50:20 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Wed, 19 May 2010 19:50:20 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Wed, 19 May 2010 11:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Wed, 19 May 2010 07:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Wed, 19 May 2010 03:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Tue, 18 May 2010 23:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Tue, 18 May 2010 21:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Tue, 18 May 2010 19:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    Tue, 18 May 2010 18:50:19 0200 (CEST)+
    Temporary error from SMTP partner: smtp;451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.
    The mail system will continue to try to deliver your message for an additional 5 days.
    I don't see any additional information in whole message.
    Regards
    Matej

Maybe you are looking for

  • NFe de devolução com referencia a Cupom Fiscal - Versão 3.10

    Olá pessoal, boa tarde! Tenho o seguinte cenário em uma instalação de IS-Retail. O sistema legado no PDV não emite notas fiscais eletrônicas para acobertar processos de devolução de vendas. Este processos, eram realizados no ECC para a versão 2.0 sem

  • Edits "lost" on save

    I opened a pdf with Acrobat X; did an ink signiture; made edits (added text) with the typewriter tool. After saving, the typewriter edits do not show when the file is opened with Mac Preview; the signiture does show. Ideas? oh, tried saving with diff

  • Error in Portal

    Hi All, I have an MSS application. On navigating from one ivew to another, the portal is displaying the following error message. 'The iview has timed out. There is no cached content to display. Click 'Reload' to display updated content. You may need

  • Transactional Replication - Distribution agent not pushing some commands

    We are experiencing an issue where our log reader is reading the commands and placing them into our distribution database, but when the distribution agent runs it skips certain commands (it is the same commands every time for one of our processes). I

  • Dreamweaver crashes when loading external code or files.

    Dreamwever CC crashes when I paste code retrieved from an external source (hubspot template, html source files, etc). If the code contains live links to certain servers (jquery on Google, etc) then Dreamweaver takes a lot to load and often crashes. I