Related to Settlement rule

HI ,
while converting planned order to production order settle is done .
when we look in settlement rule overview. the data is with respect to CAT: WBS and settlement receiver is wbs number .
but i need to change thst data . i have to teplace cat: NWA and settlement receiver should me network number and the activity .
please suggest any exit or badi or any possiblity to do the same
Regards
raadha

Giri,
Have a look at these transactions:
KSR1_ORI
Maintenance Order Strategies
KSR2_ORI
Strategy Sequences for PM-Orders
KSR3_ORI
Strategy Sequence - Ordtyp PM-Orders
PeteA

Similar Messages

Querry related to settlement rule

Hi,
      I have given default receiver as CTR and given cost center in IE02 / Now when creating Order, i am able to get default settlement rule .. but i am getting 02 line items in settlement rule both with same settlement category as CTR and same cost center ,settlement percentage is also 100% ..the difference is first line item has FUL and second line item has PER as settlement type .. I would like to know where do we control to always get 02 distribution lines in default settlement rule ..
Hope i am clear
regards
giri

Giri,
Have a look at these transactions:
KSR1_ORI
Maintenance Order Strategies
KSR2_ORI
Strategy Sequences for PM-Orders
KSR3_ORI
Strategy Sequence - Ordtyp PM-Orders
PeteA

Check settlement rule at save WBS

Hi guys,
I have a question and I'd very thankful if someone answered me.
I would need create a validation in the at save on CJ20N transaction. This validation should check settlement rule ( Really is need that checks fixed asset in the settlement rule).
We are usign this BADI WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE and the method AT SAVE, is this possible to check in this BADI :
1. WBS status ( current status, not information stored in JEST table)
2. and check that WBS division is the same as Fixed asset division ( ANLA) , being fixed asset the reciver in the WBS settlement rule. ????
really our problem is that we are not sure how to retrieve information at this point from another tables different from PROJ, PRPS, RCJ_PRPSUP and SYST.
Thank you!!!!

Hi Muralidhar!!!!
Thank you very much for your reply!!! We are trying to use that BAPI for check WBS status before it is saved.
Related to settlement rule information our problem is we don't know how obtain information from another table different from PROJ, PRPS, ....in this BADI, ( really is a technical question). We are creating a WBS ( which it has not be saved yet), settlement rule information is going to be saved in COBRA and COBRB but it is not yet.
Do you know how do I have to program it in order to obtain this information?
Thanks a lot!!!
Sara

GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

Please neglect by previous post with the same title
There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
The Process as follows:
(1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)
2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order
3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"
Acc/DR Expenses accounts
Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)

4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"
When we receive vendor invoice:
Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
Acc/Cr Vendor Account
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process
(N.B. By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL )
Your Reply is highly appreciated

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Process order - settlement rule

hi experts,
our client has a R&D trial batches scenario .
for that they will create a process order and the cost should go to cost center of r&d and not to matrial.
at present i get MAT in settlement rule , so the cost is settled against material.
i need CTR to come in default when i create the process order instaed of MAT .
please advice.
regards,
satish

If PS is implemented
for project related production for R & D
1) create a project profile with non valuated( for raw material procurement for project the price is taken from info record.
2) assign the production material in activity
3) maintain a settlement rule as cost center R &D
4) Run a MRP for a material
5) convert plan order into production order, system will set the WBS as settlement rule
6) Do the GI in MB1A or co11n ,confirmation in Co11n & GR in MB31 or MIGO or in CO11n
(If the material is valuated, system will take MAT as default ( as per the setting in OPL8 default settlement rule as PP1 or PP2)
the reason is if material is valuated, variance = (GI value + activity value) - GR value
only the variance in settled in settlement, so the variance value( (GI value + activity value) - GR value ) is going to MAT
if the material is non valuated then variance =(GI value + activity value) )
7) do the settlement for production order ( the variance (GI value + activity value) ) is settled to WBS element
8) after that confirm the project in CN27.
9) settled the project in CJ88, the cost will settled to relevant cost center
if PS in not implemented
or go head with
you can create a order in CORO itself by maintaining settlement rule as CTR with R& d cost center( manually)
we can't make particular cost center as default in settlement rule.

KOB5 Settlement Rule Extension

Hi,
Business is trying to enter line items of Capital Investment Measure to Final Settlement Rule n KOB5. Under enter Final Settlement Rule tab, it s accepting only 10 line items and not more than that. The requirement is to increase this restriction of 10 line items or remove this restriction totally.
Can you advise how we can do this.
Thanks,
Prithwi.

Hi,
1 - Go to CJ02, give your Proj / WBS and Enter,
2 - Select Related WBS & Select Settlement rule button from the same screen in bootoam
3 - next screen select Catogiry "GL" and Give Settlement Receiver GL A/C & Maintain %
Regards,
Viswa

Settlement Rule change

Dear Gurus,
This is related to an order which was created on 2007.
Order has been created and settlement rule has been defined with both PER one is 95% and other is 5% both has got settled on 2007. Now there is some balance amount which needs to be settled.
When we run the settlement rule it says there is nothing to be settled, but when we check in order there is very small amount to be settled. This is not happening because we need to change the settlement from Per to Ful but we cannot do it as this order type can have only max 2 settlement rule(both defined) and we cannot do any changes also as both of them used earlier.
Kindly let me know what shall we do for this case?
senthil

Hi Senthil,
The below links may be helpful ( Venkatesan Anandan had posted them in one tread)
http://sap-img.com/plant/settlement-rule-in-maintenance-order.htm
http://sap-img.com/plant/impact-on-business-if-pm-order-not-settled.htm
Regards
Arif

Settlement rule not getting defaulted in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi prasanth,
what i think is becoz in configuration for that order type they might have put the settlement rule as Mandatory for release thats why its coming like that. Do one thing change the settlement rule in configuration as Distribution for release and then check.
pls let me know the result after doing
if it is really helpful to you pls reward me with points
regards
Satish

Problem in Settlement Receiver during Settlement Rule in T.code IW31/32

Hi,
We have created an Equipment Number 11001212 with Business Area 1451 / Cost center 145130100. After that when are create Order in respect to that Equipment Number through IW31.
During Settlement Rule, when we select Account assignment category CTR - Cost Center...and press F4 on Settlement Receiver column, it shows the value in respect to all Cost Centers.
We want that in settlement receiver column, values should show in respect to related cost center. (defined as per Equipment Master).
Please guide...

Hi,
Pass the Order number in AFIH to get Equipment Number (EQUNR) value.
Pass the Equipment No in V_EQUI table with Valid to date (DATBI) as 31.12.999 & get the value of ILOAN value.
Pass this value in ITOB table & get Cost Center KOSTL value.
In IWO10027 user exit, in F4 possible entry option, ABAP people can restrict the required cost center.
IWO10009 PM Order: Customer Check for 'Save' Event
Even though the user enters manually some other cost center without going for F4 option, by check that value, you can give the error message, while saving the order.
Pass the Order number in AUFK table to get Object Number (OBJNR).
Pass OBJNR value in COBRB table to get KOSTL value.
Compare both the value & you can give the error message.
Give these tables, fields & user exits to ABAP people. They can form the correct logic.
Incorporate both the logic.
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Settlement Rule not defaulting in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi,
Thanks...... the issue solved.......
The issue was because of the derivation rule in Controlling.
Prase

Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

Hello,
I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L. However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

Settlement rule (Transport)

Hello All,
Can you please let me know, if there is a way to Transport Settlement rules linked to Internal order?
This is urgent. Points would be rewarded.Thanks
Regards.

Hello rajeshwari,
After you have created a settlement rule, actual costs have been incurred on the sender object, and all the settlement prerequisites for that sender have been met, you can settle the costs incurred.
You can use individual or collective processing.
Procedure: Choose Settlement from the menu of the object you want to settle.
Make the relevant entries
For the order when you are in individual processing.
For the selection variant when you are in collective processing.
In contrast to assessment, you cannot perform settlement across fiscal year boundaries.
The system automatically determines the posting date from the posting period and the fiscal year. The posting date is the last day of the posting period. There is no input field for this, but the date does appear, for example, in settlement documents.
Asset value date
This is the date for valuation in Asset Management. You can enter the date in the initial screen in the settlement or derive it from the settlement rule for the sending or receiving asset. This field does not appear, for example, during settlement of production orders.
Processing type
There are 3 processing types defined for settlement:
Automatic
The system selects all the distribution rules for a sender. Note the following special features:
If a sender only has distribution rules with settlement type PER, the system only selects and settles the costs of the settlement period.
If a sender has distribution rules with settlement type PER (PER rules) as well as distribution rules with settlement type FUL (FUL rules), the PER rules are applied first to the costs for the settlement period. If any costs are left after that, the FUL rules are applied.
A production order with the FUL settlement rule to materials is not settled until the final delivery is received. However, if any work in process is calculated for the order (order accrual), the related values can be transferred to Financial Accounting.
For investment measures, FUL rules are not applied until the measure is technically closed (compare "partial capitalization"). Assets under construction (AUC) are always settled, regardless of status.
Periodic
All distribution rules with settlement types PER and AUC are selected. PER rules are applied first. In investment measures, this is followed by settlement to assets under construction.
Partial capitalization
Use this processing type if you want to partially capitalize an investment measure which is not yet complete, that is, if you want to settle part of the overall cost to finished assets.
Hope thisn helps. please assign points.
Rgds
Manish

Autogenration of Settlement Rule

Dear All,
I am doing Customer Project. I am having 5 level in Project. My 4th level is only having billing element.
I am making settlement rule as follows.
1st Level - Settlement to PSG
2nd Level - Settlement to PSG
3rd Level - Settlement to PSG
4th Level - Settlement to PSG
5th Level - Settlement to 4th Level.
My requirement is to genrate this settlment rule automatically. Please, let me know how I can do it.
I cannt your stargy to determin these rule using trasction CJb2 since two different types of rules are there.
Let me know how I can do it??
Thanks and Regards,
Atul R. Rajmane

Dear Virendra,
Thank you for your replay.
I need few more inputs from you if possible, since I and my ABAR never work on BAdI before.
Like, after creating BAdI I need to Run CJB2 again in order to generate settlement rule or rules will generated automatically say after release, of a Project or Project WBS?
Did I need make strategy to generate the settlement rule in that case??
It will be great help if you forward some documents or links related to it.
Thanks and Regards,
Atul R. Rajmane

How to Make Settlement Rule Mandatory in Sales Order(In Acct Assigt Tab)

Hi Gurus,
I have a business requirement. For Free of charge 3rd party orders (yes they have FOC orders delivered by third party) the business wants to ensure that the Settlement rule should be mandatory. They enter cost center & receiver in the settlement rule.
i.e the order should not save till Settlement rule is maintained in the line item in the Acct Assignment tab.
Please let me know how this can be done.
1: Applied my brains on incompletion procedure but does not seems like it can be done there.
2: Is there something in CO where some setting can make it mandatory to enter settlement rule in Sales order?
3: I s there any other way in user-exits or ABAP?
4: Is there any setting in Item category(I could not locate any)?
5: Can this be done via Requirement class.
Please assist to resolve this one.

Dear,
It depends on settings in Requirement Class (OVZG) and Account Assignment Catg (AAC) in OME9
If your AAC is E in Req Class, then your sales order is a CO object.
Requirement Class in IMG can be checked - IMG > Controling > Prod Cost Planning > Cost Obj Controling > Prod Cost By Sales Order > Control of Requirement.
Or any filed any you can Make mandatory through Transaction variant SHD0.

CO Order settlement rule to be changed on monthly basis.

Hello,
We have a scenario where in CO orders (i.e. orders created in KKF1) which is being used for goods issue (MT 261). Settlement rule is defined in the order and the receiver is CO-PA.
Now the requirement is, values lying in each order needs to be distributed to say 3 profit center on every month. This distribution rule is subject to change on a monthly basis. I know we can give the percentage say 50% to PC 1, 20% to PC 2 and 30% to PC 3.
But this rule is subject to change every month. How can the user give the Settlement rule manually every time which is very time consuming. Even if we gives it cannot exceed 999 line items.User wants to use the Same co order.
Regards
Karthik

Hi ajay,
Thanks for the reply. I am also planning to do the same... but is there any other way for this...
Even While trying to settle to Cost centre, system is not allowing to settle to cost centre for apr 2014. I have already remove the 100% indicator in settlement profile.

Related to Settlement rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for