Relation between plant and shipping point

Hi all,
my simple question is, what is the relation between plant and shipping point ?
in book i read, it is many to many,
but in some web link it is showing 1 to many
what is the logic behind these two ans.
pls tell me the ans...
Regards
Avinash

Hi Hegal . K . Charles,
it is correct, as we discussed above it may be MANY to MANY .
Suppose, we hv 2 plant 1 in delhi and 2nd in nagpur. and this company want to export via inland water ways, in this case we can assign mumbai port to delhi and nagpur plant as well.
as you said it is correct, It is just not to overload the master data maintenance
Ex- In case of Sales Org. Its is always advisable to keep it minimum to per company code. Because master data records are multiplied by each additional org. element.

Similar Messages

Table that gives the relation between plant and company code

Hi gurus,
I actually have plant number and using this plant value i need to get the company code.
Is there any table that gives the relation between plant and company code. So,that i can get the company code details.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Bhanuphani,
Use T001K where BWKEY is the plant
Reward if useful
Thanks Arjun

How to get automatic plant and shipping point and storage location

hi,
sap gurus,
how to get automatic plant and shipping point and storage location automatically into the sales order
i have done all the config settings for that
but its not appearing automatically.
regards,
balaji.t

Hi
Balaji...
U can get the plant in sales order, by doing the default the same in customer master or in material master. In customer master -- sales are data--shipping tab delivering plant there u can assign and get the same in order for that customer. it is better to do in customer master rather than in material master.
Shipping point is getting determine in sales order and u can not make it default like plant. Shipping point is determine in the basis of Shipping condition of customer ( ship to party)+ loading group of material + Deliverying plant there u have to assing the shipping point and it will flow in the sales order. Tcode OVL2
For S loc u have to enter manually in the sales order u can not get it automatically.
Hope this will help you.
Thx.

Plant and shipping point have no connection but still order got created.

Hi All,
An order was created and subsequenty delivered and invoiced. Later on the goods were returned.
The problem which occured is that the return order have plant A and shipping point B, which are in no way connected to each other. There is no configuration done to attach this two, still the order got created.
I wanted to know even if plant and shipping point is different, can a order be created and saved.
Please giude me.
Regards,
Satish.

yes Satish
this is possible, take a scenario, suppose one company is having 3 plants A,B,C with shipping point A1,B1,AND C1 respectively. But the requirement is such that they will collect the material from plant A and deliver it form B1 shiiping point which is linked with plant B.
so it is possible to create and save order if plant and shipping point is different.
bye

Plant and Shipping point assignment

Dear All,
As a standard process we have copied the plants and shipping points in the development client and i have deleted the default shipping point and assigned the newly defined shipping point.I have forgotten to assign one plant and shipping point and i have even deleted the default shipping point.Now i have to assign the plant x to the shipping point x where i am not able to find the plant in the ovxc screen.Is there any way to find the missing plant or i have to delete all the assignments and reassign again.
Help required as early as possible.
Thanks in advance,
Ramesh.

1) Check in OX10 whether you could see that plant
2) Check in OVXD whether you could see that shipping point
If the answer to both is yes, then you should be able to see in OVXC also. If not, better try to delete in the above areas also, recreate and then check in OVXC
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Database table/FM to find relation between plant and company code in SRM

Hi,
I have a requirement where I need to determine the relation between the plant and company code in SRM.
The plant and company code both belong to R/3. We are replicating the plant by using the report BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL.
This plant is now available as a BP in SRM. But from which SRM table or using which SRM FM can I get the relation between this and the company code?
Thanks,
Srivatsan

Hi
Check table BBP_LOCMAP. (Plants) - Manage Table Business Partner > System > Location
BBP_COMPCODE_FAV User-Specific Favorites for Permitted Company code.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Plant and shipping point is determined at Header or item level?

Hi,
Shipping point is determined at Header level or item level of Sales order?
How about Plant??
Thanks!!

Both Shipping point & Plant are determined for each Item in the Sales order automatically by the system.
For determining Plant, system first search the CMIR,
if not found the Plant there or CMIR is maintained then system searches Customer master of the SH, i
f here also not found then system sarches the Material master.
This is called Priority rule which is hard coded in SAP and can be changed by customisation.
For determining Shipping point, system takes three fields into consideration, they are
1. Shipping condition (first check Sales doc type , if not found then takes from Customer master of SP)
2. Loading group ( material master> sales org group 2)
3. Delivering Plant
So, they are (Shipping point & Plant ) item specific data in sales order.

Relation between Sales org and Shipping Point

Hai all,
Can any one tell me wt is the relation between Sales Org and Shipping point?
Ravi
< PLEASE DONT USE SMS LANGUAGE AND PLEASE SEARCH THE FORUMS. >

Hi Ravi,
There is no direct relation.
Sales organisation in broader level, it is responsible for selling a product in a company.
It is liable to the customer interms of service of the product or service and confirmation of the sale order, delivery and invoicing.
Shipping Point is a logical point from where the shipment / dispatch begins.
Both Sales organisation & Shipping point wil be linked to plant (one or more).
In case of sale order, sales org will decide the delivering plant.
Shipping point will be picked based on delivery plant, sh.conditions (cmr) & loading grp (mmr).
hope this is clear to you now!

Is any relation between customerNo and Plant in R/3

hi,
in bapi_salesorder_cretefromdat2 i can get netprice by giving import parameters like customerNo,salesArea,material, etc.......That means customer should be assinged to a plant(one sales area can have many plants( material price can vary from plant to plant) .pls give me clear picture on how net price is calculated in bapi_salesorder_createfromdat2.
regards
Guru

There is a relation between customer and plant in the KNA1 General Data in Customer Master table.
kna1-kunnr
kna1-werks.
Kindly reward the points

Relation between Rollup and compression.

Hi All,
Is there a relation between rollup and compression ? i.e if i compress the cube, will the rollup job be faster ?

Hi,
Thanks for all your replies. Now the picture is crystal clear.
1. A compression job moves data from F table to E table. This is also applicable for aggregates. If you schedule a compression job for a cube, the aggregates are automatically compressed( You can also compress aggregates of a cube without compressing the cube. There are programs avalibale for the same).
2. Assume that you have not done compression . If you load the data to base cube ,it takes more time to create the indexes after loading.
3) Assume that you have done compression . If you load the data to base cube ,it takes less time than 2 point to create the indexes after loading.
On similar lines, if aggregates of a cube are compressed before rollup, then rollup will be faster. This is what exactly I have experienced. I had a cube which had 1000 request. It was never compressed. The rollup job for the cube used to take around 60,000 seconds. I compressed 900 requests. Now the rollup job gets over in 2400 seconds.So the conclusion is the following:
When aggregates of a cube are compressed, the rollup job runs faster.
Message was edited by: Tej Trivedi

What are the Relations between Journalizing and IKM?

What is the best method to use in the following scenario:
I have about 20 source tables with large amount of data.
I need to create interfaces that join the source tables into target tables.
The source tables are inserted every few secondes with about hundreds to thousands rows.
There can be a gap of few seconds between the insert of different tables that sould be joined.
The source and target tables are on the same Oracle instance and schema.
I want to understand the role of: 'Journalizing CDC' and 'IKM - Incremental Update' and
how can i use it in my scenario?
In general What are the relations between 'Journalizing' and 'IKM'?
Should i use both of them? Or maybe it is better to deelte and insert to the target tables?
I want to understand what is the role of 'Journalizing CDC'?
Can 'IKM - Incremental Update' work without 'Journalizing'?
Does 'Journalizing' need to have PK on the tables?
What should i do if i can't put PK (there can be multiple identical rows)?
Thanks in advance Yael

Hi Yael,
I will try and answer as many of your points as I can in one post :-)
Journalizing is way of tracking only changed data in your source system, if your source tables had a date_modified you could always use this as a filter when scanning for changes rather than CDC, Log based CDC (Asynchronous in ODI, Logminer/Streams or Goldengate for example) removes the overhead of of placing a trigger on the source table to track changes but be aware that it doesnt fully remove the need to scan the source tables, in answer to you question about Primary keys, Oracle CDC with ODI will create an unconditional log group on the columns that you have defined in ODI as your PK, the PK columns are tracked by the database and presented in a Journal table (J$<source_table_name>) this Journal table is joined back to source table via a journalizing view (JV$<source_table_name>) to get the rest of the row (ie none PK columns) - So be aware that when ODI comes around to get all data in the Journalizing view (ie Inserts, Updates and Deletes) the source database performs a join back to the source table. You can negate this by specifying ALL source table columns in your PK in ODI - This forces all columns into the unconditional log group, the journal table etc. - You will need to tweak the JKM to then change the syntax sent to the database when starting the journal - I have done this in the past, using a flexfield in the datastore to toggle 'Full Column' / 'Primary Key Cols' to go into the JKM set up (there are a few Ebusiness suite tables with no primary key so we had to do this) - The only problem with this approach is that with no PK , you need to make sure you only get the 'last' update and in the right order to apply to your target tables, without so , you might process the update before the insert for example, and be out of sync.
So JKM's provide a mechanism for 'Change data only' to be provided to ODI, if you want to handle deletes in your source table CDC is usefull (otherwise you dont capture the delete with a normal LKM / IKM set up)
IKM Incremental update can be used with or without JKM's, its for integrating data into your target table, typically it will do a NOT EXISTS or a Minus when loading the integration table (I$<target_table_name>) to ensure you only get 'Changed' rows on the load into the target.
user604062 wrote:
I want to understand the role of: 'Journalizing CDC' and 'IKM - Incremental Update' and
how can i use it in my scenario?Hopefully I have explained it above, its the type of thing you really need to play around with, and throroughly review the operator logs to see what is actually going on (I think this is a very good guide to setting it up : http://soainfrastructure.blogspot.ie/2009/02/setting-up-oracle-data-integrator-odi.html)
In general What are the relations between 'Journalizing' and 'IKM'?JKM simply presents (only) changed data to ODI, it removes the need for you to decide 'how' to get the updates and removes the need for costly scans on the source table (full source to target table comparisons, scanning for updates based on last update date etc)
Should i use both of them? Or maybe it is better to deelte and insert to the target tables?Delete and insert into target is fine , but ask yourself how do you identify which rows to process, inserts and updates are generally OK , to spot a delete you need to compare the table in full, target table minus source table = deleted rows , do you want to copy the whole source table every time to perform this ? Are they in the same database ?
I want to understand what is the role of 'Journalizing CDC'?Its the ODI mechanism for configuring, starting, stopping the change data capture process in the source systems , there are different KM's for seperate technologies and a few to choose for Oracle (Triggers (Synchronous), Streams / Logminer (Asynchronous), Goldengate etc)
Can 'IKM - Incremental Update' work without 'Journalizing'?Yes of course, Without CDC your process would look something like :
Source target ----< LKM >---- Collection table (C$) ----<IKM>---- Integration table (I$) -----< IKM >---- Target table
With CDC your process looks like :
Source Journal (J$ table with JV$ view) ----< LKM >---- Collection table (C$) ----<IKM>---- Integration table (I$) -----< IKM >---- Target table
as you can see its the same process after the source table (there is an option in the interface to enable the J$ source , the IKM step changes with CDC as you can use 'Synchronise Journal Deletes'
Does 'Journalizing' need to have PK on the tables?Yes - at least a logical PK in the datastore, see my reply at the top for reasons why (Log Groups, joining back the J$ table to the source table etc)
What should i do if i can't put PK (there can be multiple identical rows)? Either talk to the source system people about adding one, or be prepared to change the JKM (and maybe LKM, IKM's) , you can try putting all columns in the PK in ODI. Ask yourself this , if you have 10 identical rows in your source and target tables, and one row gets updated - how can you identify which row in the target table to update ?
>
Thanks in advance YaelA lot to take in, as I advised I would reccomend you get a little test area set up and also read the Oracle database documentation on CDC as it covers a lot of the theory that ODI is simply implementing.
Hope this helps!
Alastair

What is the relation between KTOPL and 0CHRT_ACCTS_ATTR? both Chart of Acct

Hi
If an R3 field e.g. KTOPL (in datasource 0fi_gl_4) which is a "Chart of Accout" is extracted a part of 0fi_gl_4 to BI,
is there the need to separately extract 0CHRT_ACCTS_ATTR & 0CHRT_ACCTS_TEXT which are also "Chart of Accout"
What is the relation between KTOPL and 0CHRT_ACCTS_ATTR & 0CHRT_ACCTS_TEXT in R3?
What is the relation between KTOPL and 0CHRT_ACCTS_ATTR & 0CHRT_ACCTS_TEXT in BI?
Thx

Hi,
I get these well with examples so let me see if I get your point:
So in the tranx data the 0fg_gl will be a value for KTOPL e.g. 450009 as a G/L Account number? (Values for chart of Acct should be GL Accounts, right?)
but before this tranx data is loaded, preferrably, 0CHRT_ACCTS_ATTR and 0CHRT_ACCTS_TEXT should have been extracted to BI; and data loaded; and this will be the master data and there should have been in it:
.._ATTR -
.._TEXT
450009 -
Petty cash Expenses
Is my understanding exact?
Thnx

What is the relation between UTXJ and JMOD, how JMOD determine in order

Hi All,
What is the relation between UTXJ and JMOD!
How JMOD determine in order! ( For TAXINJ).
Please help me
Regards
raj

Dear Raj
Both are not related in anyway. UTXJ is for sales tax and JMOD is for excise condition. For UTXJ, you need to create a tax code in FTXP and assign it in VK11 / UTXJ, whereas, JMOD is an excise condition type for which, you need to maintain the relevant datas in J1ID.
Coming to your question, how JMOD is determined in sale order, it is based on delivering plant. This delivering plant, as already said above, you will have to maintain in J1ID with the indicator "1" under declared tab in Material Chapter ID combination.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Cant Assign Plant to Shipping Point

Dear Gurus,
I've defined my Plant then later defined my shipping points. When it came to OVXC I could not see my plant so therefore I could not assign my shipping points to it. What is the reason for this .. did I miss a step? Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Jin

go to define plant and see whether ur plant is appearing there and whether u have maintained the address for the plant, if yes check whether u have maintained these things:
1.define sales org.
2.defien division
3.define sales office.
4.define shipping point.(check if u have maintained the address for the shipping point)
5.assign sales org. to company code
6.assign distribution channel to sales org.
7.assign division to sales org.
8.set up sales area
9.assign sales office to sales area
10.assign sales org, dist.channel to plant
11assign shipping point to plant

Relation between URL and content in JSF navigation

Hello,
I've tried lots of JSF examples and there always occoured a strange kind of navigation to me:
The URL you see in the browser's address bar has nothing to do with the actually displayed JSP. Instead of that, the URL is always pointing to the previously called JSP - where the call to the current JSP comes from.
I know where this comes from:
If the form tags don't define an action, they are pointing to the current page itself.
And the actually called navigation case is chosen by a (hidden) post parameter.
So the JSF controller servlet doesn't actually care, which URL is called - it just regards the mentioned parameter.
This kind of navigation seems quite confusing, especcially since JSF claims to make navigation clearer.
One of the basic demands of the web applications we are developing is, to have a clear relation between URL and page content.
E.g. it must be possible to index the pages with search engines. Or to simply bookmark distinct pages in the browsers favourites.
Another problem about this navigation concept is, that it always works with forms and with post method (you can't choose get method), even if you just have simple links - e.g. detail view of a single item after selecting it from a list of items. That way it's not possible to ever use the back button of your browser.
I'm new to JSF, so my question:
Is this the (one-and-only) navigation concept of JSF, or are there alternative concepts as well?
I would be surprised, since the mentioned demands are basic web standard - although I didn't find any alternatives so far.
Thanks,
Chily

Thanks for the answer!
I'm not sure, if using a redirect on every single call is very achieveable and in the purpose of the JSF design.
E.g. it is generating a lot of traffic overhead.
(Identifying the navigation case by the page name instead of a hidden parameter would help a lot.)
Or the history of the browser doesn't work with it, so you can't identify visited links.
But anyways, there are also internal problems with it in most cases: I've inserted the <redirect/> tag in the navigation cases of a few examples. This just causes a call of the <to-view-id> page, without any parameters. So I probably have to add some non-standard-processing around the call to make it work:
If e.g. I have the standard case of a list of items (let's say in a dataTable), which are identified by an id. And each item uses a commandLink to call it's detail view.
* How do I get the identifier (id) as a parameter into the redirect URL?
* And how do I access this parameter in the destination form bean to choose the item to be displayed? (see also http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=607505)
Thanks for help,
Chily

Relation between plant and shipping point

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for