Relationship between events, Methods,Container, & workflow

Hi all,
could you pls navigate through the hierarchical steps linking the above and explain the role/usage of these with a simple example.
thanks,
Subba

Thanks Rajan,
i need to understand the technical components involved in the flow..
so if i have a scenario like:
1) user creates and saves a Purchase order
2) his superior should get a mail to release/hold the PO
3) if yes then PO should be released.
so how would the events, containers, BOR methods and workflow container look like.
Thanks,
Subba.

Similar Messages

Relationship between Events, Album & Web Gallery

Hi, I'm new to iPhoto 08. Please bear with me if my question sounds stupid
What is the relationship between Events, Album and Web Gallery?
1. From Events, when I publish them to Web Gallery, does both environment auto sync with each other?
2. From Events, I create Album, then I publish to Web Gallery, do all 3 environments auto sync?
3. Why use Album when I can choose Option 1?
If I want to keep it simple and just want to put my photos to the web gallery, do I just use Option 1?
Thanks heaps.
Cheers,
Thomas

Thomas
Nothing - except Smart Albums - auto updates. If you add pics to an Event or Album you'll need to then update the corresponding Web Galleries.
Albums are infinitely more useful than Events for organising your pics.
Events are simple, date-based folders. Events in the iPhoto Window correspond exactly with the Folders in the Originals Folder in the iPhoto Library package file (Right click on it in the Pictures Folder -> Show Package Contents). However, Events cannot be nested, for instance and are very inflexible. A pic cannot be in more than one Event without duplicating the actual file.
Albums can be nested inside folders, can be created by drag and drop, or any of the Smart Album criteria - including but not limited to Date, Keywords, Ratings, even camera model. Like Playlists in iTunes, Albums are virtual a pic can be in 1,10 or 100 albums with no wasted disk space.
Regards
TD

Relationship between the workflows what have been triggered frm parent workflow using container step

Hi All,
There is a scenario in CQ5.5 where "Workflow A" has container step to initiate another "Workflow B" from it. Now the requirement is to identity the Workflow A's instance ID in "Workflow B".
Being quite unable to find any relationship between the workflows what have been triggered from parent workflow using container step.
Could any one share the pointers for the same?
Thanks in advanced.
Regards,
Saurav Jain
7428081341

Please do not keep reposting this.
Those of us that answer questions here are volunteers ... not paid Oracle employees.
If no one answered your question to your satisfaction it is either because they choose not to, don't know the answer, or because lacking a version number no one knows to what version you are referring.
My recommendation is that you go to http://asktom.oracle.com where you will find extremely good explanations of cursor sharing.
Thank you.

Does table STPOX contain parent-child relationship between components

Hello
I need to get a list of components of SO BOM.
FM CS_BOM_EXPL_KND_V1 exports an output table STPOX.
Does this table contain parent-child relationship between components? If yes , can somebody tell me which fields contain parent child id.
thanks

Hi,
STPOX is not a table, it is a structure & hence there is no storing of data in a structure. The table which stores this info is STPO.
To get the link you can refer to STPO-STLNR & pass this value to MAST-STLNR, this way you can link the child with its parent.
Regards,
Vivek

OTL - Table Relationship between Timecard and Workflow

Hi All,
Our employees work multiple projects and charge their time thru OTL to each of individual project as appropriate every pay period. Each project has it's own project manager. When an employee sumbits his timecard for approval the workflow routes an approval notification to EACH project manager. Every project manager must approve the employee's timecard before the "overall" timecard status is APPROVED.
For example, an employee works on four diffent projects - each project has a different PM. When the employee submits his timecard for approval an approval notification is sent to all four PMs. However, more than occasionally at least one of the PMs doesn't approve the timecard in a timely fashion so the employee's timecard is "hung up" waiting for approval.
I need to write a query in which I specifiy both an employee and particular pay period, and the query returns for the employee/pay peirod EACH Project Name, the PM for the respective project, and whether or not the the PM has approved the employee's time for the respective PM's project in the specified pay period.
Unfortunately I don't really know where to start. I don't know if there is an HXC or group of HXC tables that would allow me to report on the individual project manager's 'status' (i.e., has a PM approved his project in the employee's timecard)...or do I need to allow include some workflow tables such as (maybe ?) wf_notifications ? And if I need to include some WF tables can someone help me understand where the relationship between timecard and WF is definded/stored (in other words, for a particular timecard how can I query a WF table - for example, wf_notifications - and find all the respective notifications associated with that particular timecard ?
I hope my question is clear, but please advise if you have any questions. Thanks in advance for the help !!
Jeff

Hi Jeff,
Did you ever get an answer on this question, as I have similar issues.
One question you may be able to answer - Do all approvals on the project side need to be done for ANY project information to pull into Project Accounting, or as each Project Manager approves their portion does it pull in to PA?
Thanks very much!!
Lori

1-to-1 Relationship Between UI and subVI Data Cluster

Discussion continued from here.
In summary:
JackDunaway wrote:
Yes,
I can see clear benefits in implementing this Idea - that is, if your
underlying datatype elements have a 1:1 relationship with the UI
elements.
I will
illustrate this point by showing some potential flaws in your example:
"Profile Running" and "Profile Complete" are mutually exclusive, no?
Wouldn't it be better to have a single enum named "Profile" with three
elements "Idle, Running, and Complete" for the underlying datatype?
Having two mutually exclusive pieces of data in an underlying datatype
is among my favorite of code smell indicators.
Also, the underlying datatype probably only needs "Forward Miles" and
"Reverse Miles" since "Total Miles" is derived. Exclude "Total Miles"
from the underlying cluster and just show the sum for display.
Another
argument against using a 1:1 relationship: the customer now wants to
multiply speed by -1 if Direction==Reverse and not show the Direction
enum on the UI. The data source (the VI that generates the data) would
need to be updated using your 1:1 relationship. Using underlying data
different from the display data, only the data client (the UI front
panel) needs to change. I would be much more inclined to service the UI
FP for a cosmetic upgrade rather than tracing the data source back
through the HMI framework, through TCP, back to the RT, back to FPGA...
Basically...
I question a perfectly overlapped Venn Diagram where the set of data
shown to the user equals the dataset used for underlying data
processing/messaging/storing. The underlying datatype should be as
stripped and streamlined as possible, while the display datatype can
inherit all the flair and post-processing that Upper Management wants to
see in a UI.
LabBEAN wrote:
<JackDunaway wrote
I will illustrate this point by showing some potential flaws in your example...
<LabBEAN response
The data you see maps directly to tags on the PLC.
<JackDunaway wrote
Yes, I can see clear benefits in implementing this Idea - that is, if your underlying datatype elements have a 1:1 relationship with the UI elements.
<LabBEAN response
JackDunaway wrote:
This is a good indicator that we're both aware at this point that I'm
missing something... in all seriousness, could you reply to the 1:1
argument? I really want to understand this Idea and learn how/if I need
to apply it to my own style (our last back-and-forth turned out to be an enlightening and introspective exercise for me).
***EDIT: By all means, please start a discussion on the LabVIEW board so we're not hindered by the Exchange's interface. ***
My long delayed response:
The indicators you see map to tags on the PLC. That is, we were connecting through OPC to an application on a PLC that was written ~15 years ago. I have a VI where I read a bunch of SVs (Shared Variables). Each SV is bound through OPC to a PLC tag. In the interest of disclosure, two 16-bit tags are required to represent each 32-bit mileage number. In the same subVI, I read each set of mileage tags, convert, and feed my subVI cluster indicator. The same is true for wheel size: three bits get converted to the enum. Regardless, though, I have one subVI that reads SVs and outputs the same "underlying data" cluster that is seen on the UI. The UI has a "Faults" cluster full of fault Booleans that follows the same logic. When the user configures a profile of steps, they do so via an array of "step" clusters (although the cluster look is hidden for aesthetics). It's the same thing as above except we write tags instead of reading them.
In my case, each set of 16-bit tags is worthless as two 16-bit numbers. They are only useful as a 32-bit mileage, so I don't pass around the raw 16-bit data. The same is true for the wheel size bits. My software can just as easily (in fact, more easily) operate on the enum. So, the underlying cluster from the subVI is programmatically useful and applicable to the UI. I would guess that the same is true for a lot of RT applications, where the read VI can have some intelligence to process the data into useful / applicable clusters.
There are going to be cases where "Upper Management" would like to see "flair and post-processing" as you say. Your speed illustration is a good example of this. There are also instances where the cluster works fine on the UI the way it is (like this one and many others that we've seen).
<JackDunaway wrote
"Profile Running" and "Profile Complete" are mutually exclusive, no?
Wouldn't it be better to have a single enum named "Profile" with three
elements "Idle, Running, and Complete" for the underlying datatype?
<LabBEAN response
Did you mean "not" mutually exclusive? We combined 3 "dependent" (not mutually exclusive) Booleans into an enum for Wheel Size, as I mentioned above. Not sure now why we went the other way with these two (this was 2 years ago). In any event, with regard to UI representation, I still pass a cluster out of my read-raw-data-and-process-into-cluster subVI up to the applicable queued state machines and to the UI.
<JackDunaway wrote
Having two mutually exclusive pieces of data in an underlying datatype
is among my favorite of code smell indicators.
<LabBEAN response
Working with applications written in ladder logic, it is not uncommon to see separate Booleans that indicate the same condition. This seems to be especially true when safety is a concern. That is, ladder Coil A ON and Coil B OFF == switch open. Coil A OFF and Coil B ON == switch closed. If you ever read OPC tags from Coil A and Coil B and the two are the same, you know the ladder is in transition (hasn't updated the tags). Throw that point out and read again.
I, too, appreciate our back-and-forths. Good discussion.
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Wait for Flag / Set Flag
Separate Views from Implementation for Strict Type Defs

Thanks for replying, Jason. Let me see if I can craft a coherent response after getting back up to speed...
(...later)
OK, let's go. I'm going to fully agree with you that LabVIEW imposes a strange constraint unique from most other languages where a Typedef defines two things: the underlying data structure, and also the view. A Strict Typedef should be more accurately deemed the Datatype-View-Definition, and a Typedef would be more accurately called the Datatype-Definition-and-View-Suggestion. And to be clear, there are two types of views: the programmer's view (a SubVI look and feel) and the UI view (what the user and Upper Management sees). (Finally, I admit I'm ignorant whether view or View is more a more appropriate term)
Linking the programmer's view to the datatype is perfectly fine with me, and based on your original Idea I think we both agree that's OK. I think we run into a disagreement where you have loosely tied the concept of "Strict TD" to "UI View".
Historically, I have used Strict Typedefs for the programmer's view (SubVIs), since I like to maintain a "functional UI" at the SubVI level. I don't use type definitions on User Interfaces - only Controls. That's the reason your Idea does not appeal to me, but perhaps if your Idea were implemented, it would appeal to me since View and Implementation would be divorced as separate entities within the Type Definition. (Does that classify as a Catch-22?) So, you're Idea is fundamentally suggesting that Type Definition .ctl files should be more accurately called "a container that holds both a Type Definition and any number of View Definitions as well".
Fundamentally, I think I finally understand the gist of your Idea: "let's ditch this weird constraint where View and Datatype are inextricably defined together in one file", and for that, I'll give Kudos to the original Idea. I got really tied up with the example you used to present the Idea, and plus I'm still learning a lot.
Additional thoughts:
This Idea reminds me of another: Tag XControl as Class View
We've still got some arguing to do on a 1:1 relationship between underlying datatype and UI presentation, so put your mean face back on:
Since our last conversation, interestingly, I have been on an anti-Typedef kick altogether. Why don't you drop some feedback on my attempt at a completely typedef-free UI framework?
a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"] {color: black;} a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"]:after {content: '';} .jrd-sig {height: 80px; overflow: visible;} .jrd-sig-deploy {float:left; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img {float:right; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img:hover {opacity:0.8;} .jrd-sig-deploy:hover {opacity:0.8;}

Relationship between WebDynproContext and Interactive Form (WebDynpro ABAP)

Hi,
I created a WebDynpro application including an interactive form. The context of the view contains a node 'Employeeinfo' with a further node 'Employeerecords' and a Attribute pdfSource. The node Employeerecords contains 2 Attributes: Employeename and Position.
the structure looks like this:
CONTEXT
___Employeeinfo (node)
______Employeerecords (node)
_________Employeename (attribute)
_________Position (attribute)
______pdfSource (attribute)
Employeerecords should be used as a table with the columns Empl.-name and Position. The Content of this table is filled by a Supply-Method.
I bound the properties of the interactive form like this:
pdfSource-> pdfSource
datasource-> Employeerecords
The Interface of the interactive Form is XML created by Context of the webDynpro Component.
When I start the application it is showing me an empty form allthough the Content was created correct by the Supply-Method ( I tested this with a WebDynproTable element in the same View). The table seems to be there ( I check this with a seperate color) but the Rows are not created.
It seems to me that there would be no relationship between the WD-Context and the Interactive Form.
Do you think it is a design mistake or a software problem?
I work with the following software components:
AdobeLifeCycleDesigner 7.1
Adobe Reader 7.0.9
SAP NW 04s
SAP GUI 6.4
ADS is working fine.
Could you please help me?
Thank you,
Nadin

check the following points
(this is an old version of requirements but still will help)
2-1 The SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio (Support Package Stack 11) including Adobe LiveCycle Designer (forms design tool) is installed on your computer.
2-2 You have access to the SAP J2EE Engine (Release 6.40). (Note that you can download an evaluation version (Sneak Preview SAP Web Application Server 6.40 Java) from the SDN Download Area at https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/downloadarea.sdn.)
2-3 Adobe Reader 7.0.x is installed on your computer.
2-4 The Active Component Framework (ACF) of the Interactive Forms integration is installed on your computer. With SP Stack 11, calling a Web Dynpro application that includes a PDF form for the first time should automatically install the ACF in the background. If you experience
difficulties that may be related to the frontend installation, please see SAP Note 766191 on the SAP Service Marketplace for manual installation.
2-5 The Adobe document services are configured on the SAP J2EE Engine you are using. To access the Installation and Configuration Guides for Adobe document services, go to http://service.sap.com/nw04installation → SAP Web AS → SAP Web AS 6.40 SR1 and Related Documentation → Adobe Document Services.
2-6 Basic knowledge of developing Web Dynpro applications. For helpful information about Web Dynpro, go to https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/developerareas/webdynpro.sdn?node=linkDnode6-2.
regards,
-ag.

Problem with a 1:M relationship between two entity beans

I am having trouble trying to implement a 1:M relationship between two EJB2.0 entity beans using and EJBQL query. I have an ApplicantEJB, which contains a collection of phone numbers. The applicant table in the database has one primary key, applicant_id. The applicant_phones database table has a compound primary key--applicant_id and phone_type_id--so I have implemented a custom PK class to represent this, PhonePK. I have implemented a findByNameAndPhone method in my ejb-jar.xml file with the following syntax:
SELECT object(a) FROM applicants a, applicant_phones p where a.applicantID = p.applicantID and a.name = ?1 and p.phoneNumber = ?2
If I deploy this, Orion/OC4J translates the query in the orion-ejb-jar.xml with an incorrect reference to the applicant_phones.applicant_id column:
SELECT a.applicant_id FROM applicants a , applicant_phones p WHERE ((a.applicant_id = p.applicantID ) AND (a.name = ?) AND (p.phone_number = ? ))
I must have something wrong with the ApplicantEJB and PhoneEJB primary key mappings in my orion-ejb-jar.xml file, but I have tried many different combinations of values and keep getting them overwritten by the container with each deployment. Why is Orion/OC4J defaulting the applicant_id reference to the ob[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

I have posted excerpts from my orion-ejb-jar.xml file in this posting: Problem mapping a 1:M relationship between two entity EJBs w/ a compound PK
Sorry for the duplicate postings, but I was getting errors on the submission.
April

Table relationship between Profit Center and G/L account.

Hi,
I have an issue related to wrong profit centers. We have a workflow that updating the profit center to a G/L account regarding the business of Reverse Logistic. In that business, we shift from a G/L account to another G/L account.
Now I have to find the tables relationship between Profit center and G/L account, which contains the correct relationship between a profit center and a G/L account, so that I can profit centers related to the moved G/L account and the original G/L account.
Thank you.
Moderator: Please, search before posting

Hi
The Posted data can be seen in BSEG & GLPCA/FAGLFLEXA
The default assignment of GL & PC can be seen in 3KEH / FAGL3KEH
br, Ajay M

What relationship between RMI interface and stub?

Hi:
I think the stub is enough to remote call, why to use RMI interface? what relationship
between RMI interface and stub?
Regards!
Stive

Hi,
Stub is merely a proxy for server , it doesn't contain any declarations of
remote methods. to which it is being responsible for .
where RMI interface is one which contains signature of the Remote methods which
throws Remote Exception.
Regards
Karthikeyan Gangadharan
SIP Technologies, Chennai
E-mail-ID: [email protected]
"Stive" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi:
I think the stub is enough to remote call, why to use RMI interface?
what relationship
between RMI interface and stub?
Regards!
Stive

Relationship between unknown SAP-TABLES

Hi Folks,
Lets take a scenario of populating an ouput internal table with fields from 4 unknown sap tables(relation between the tables is unknown). How can we check the relationship between those tables to populate the internal table..? What are the possible ways to check the relationship between tables..?
Can u please help me on this.
Thanks n regards,
ram.

Hi Ram,
 I tried the following method to find relation between tables and i think it is quite useful. I hope this will be of some use to you.
-> Goto SE11 and display one of the tables.
-> Click on the Graphic icon on the toolbar or use shortcut ctrlshiftF11
-> It displays all the related tables by foreign key and even gives you all check tables involved. If the list is a long one, you can even use Find option to check if the other tables you are trying to find relation with, exist in the screen.
 Hope this Helps!! Do get back!!
Regards,
Naveenan.

Relationship Between ECC Customers (Contact Persons) and CRM BP

Hello,
I am new to middleware and need some help with the relationship between ECC customers/contact persons and CRM business partners.
We are transferring via bdoc this information from ECC to CRM.
Which bdoc types are used when transferring customers/contact persons? I believe it is BUPA_MAIN but am not too sure. How is the relationship between customer its contact person transferred? Is this done through BUPA_REL? I looked at the segment fields in SBDM but am not too sure how to understand the relationship...
Thanks for the help!
Regards,
Tiffanie

Thanks! With the initial load, how do I check what fields are being passed in the bdocs?
I tried to look for customer_main, customer_rel in SBDM and couldn't find it. Instead I used BUPA_MAIN and found some segments but couldn't find all the data that was being transferred (e.g. customer name, address, etc...) Where do I find all the fields contained in the bdoc?
I see them in SMW01 when I view the bdoc contents but can not find the actual structure (data fields) that are being brought in from ECC.
Thanks!
Tiffanie

Problem with 1:many relationship between entity beans.

Hi All!
I have two tables TMP_GROUP and TMP_EMPLOYEE with following fields:
TMP_GROUP: ID, CAPTION, COMMENT, STATUS.
TMP_EMPLOYEE: ID, LOGIN, GROUP_ID.
For this tables i create two entity beans GROUP and EMPLOYEE respectively.
The relationship looks like this
descriptor ejb.xml:
<ejb-relation>
 <description>description</description>
 <ejb-relation-name>employeesOfGroup</ejb-relation-name>
 <ejb-relationship-role>
 <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.mypackage.GroupBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
 <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
 <relationship-role-source>
 <ejb-name>GroupBean</ejb-name>
 </relationship-role-source>
 <cmr-field>
 <cmr-field-name>employees</cmr-field-name>
 <cmr-field-type>java.util.Collection</cmr-field-type>
 </cmr-field>
 </ejb-relationship-role>
 <ejb-relationship-role>
 <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.mypackage.EmployeeBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
 <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
 <relationship-role-source>
 <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
 </relationship-role-source>
 </ejb-relationship-role>
 </ejb-relation>
descriptor persistent.xml:
<table-relation>
 <table-relationship-role
 key-type="PrimaryKey">
 <ejb-name>GroupBean</ejb-name>
 <cmr-field>employees</cmr-field>
 </table-relationship-role>
 <table-relationship-role
 key-type="NoKey">
 <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
 <fk-column>
 <column-name>GROUP_ID</column-name>
 <pk-field-name>ejb_pk</pk-field-name>
 </fk-column>
 </table-relationship-role>
 </table-relation>
Now i implement business method:
public Long addEmployee(String login, long groupId) {
 Long result;
 try {
 EmployeeLocal employee = employeeHome.create(login);
 GroupLocal group =
 groupHome.findByPrimaryKey(new Long(groupId));
 Collection employees = group.getEmployees();
 employees.add(employee);
 result = (Long) employee.getPrimaryKey();
 } catch (CreateException ex) {
 result = new Long(0);
 } catch (FinderException ex) {
 result = new Long(0);
 return result;
When i call this method from web service, the following exception is raised:
com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseTransactionRolledbackLocalException: Exception in method com.mypackage.GroupLocalHomeImpl0.findByPrimaryKey(java.lang.Object).
P.S.
1) I have transaction attribute set to "Required" for all methods of all beans
2) I have unique index for each table:
TMP_GROUP_I1: CAPTION
TMP_EMPLOYEE_I1: LOGIN (however i think GROUP_ID must be added here too)
3) I tried many:many relationship with this tables and it works fine
4) I try another implementation of addEmployee method with
EmployeeLocal employee = employeeHome.create(login, groupId);
without using GroupLocal cmr-field and GroupLocalHome findByPrimaryKey method, the result is same error.
Can somebody help me with this problem?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards, Abramov Andrey.

I have posted excerpts from my orion-ejb-jar.xml file in this posting: Problem mapping a 1:M relationship between two entity EJBs w/ a compound PK
Sorry for the duplicate postings, but I was getting errors on the submission.
April

Creating a relationship between one table and the PK in another

Sorry the subject of this message is a bit vague. I'm not sure how to describe this problem in one sentence.
So here's the issue: I've just created a new block on my form based on table2. Table2 contains t1_id which is the FK link to Table1.
What I want is when one of the fields in Table2's block is changed and inserted, the t1_id is inserted in the applicable row. Essentially, I need :table2.t1_id to have the 'Copy From Item' property set at :table1.id
I cannot seem to see where in designer this option is. I asked a friend and he said what I need to do is 'create a relationship between the two values in designer'. Huh? In the Table Definitions the FK is set for the two, so I'm not sure how to do this.
Another problem, which I'm believing will be solved when this is, is that when the form loads, this new block, table2, is not automatically populated with the applicable values from the table.
Thanks for any help. It's greatly appreciated!

Do you mean that you want to create a Master-Detail Form using Designer?
If yes, you need to define the entity usage from the Function Hierarchy Diagrammer, then attribute usage definition. Generate the module using Application Design Transformer. You need to define the Context so that master table's PK will be carried over to the detail table.

How to create the relationship between ESSBASE 11 and DM in OBIEE11

Hi Experts,
I have one requirement that there is one property table named 'Store Master' in DW,and it contains a lot of attribute, such as Open Date, Close Date, IS 24 Hour etc.
But another data source is essbase and based on this source, I create all reports.
In ESSBASE, it has one dimension and hierarchy Location, and it has four level, Country(L1),Region (L2),Province(L3),Store(L4)
So I want to know how to create the relationship between Location (ESSBASE) and Store Master (DM).
I try to create one relationship in physical layer between Gen4,Location and Store, then drag the open date and close date into Location Dimension in BMM,then Presentation Layer.
When I drag column 'Open Date' ,'Gen4,Location ' and 'Sales' into reports, it will generate the following error message:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request Dim Region.Store Open Date. (HY000)
However, when I remove the column 'Open Date'. it will be ok.
So what I missing the steps? Please help me. Thanks.

>
'2. Now, pull the 'Store' column from relational DB onto the Gen5, Location column from Essbase. This action now creates, two logical sources for your 'Store' column.'
If the length from different data source is not same,such as 1001(DM),L_1001(ESSBASE), can I drag the 'Store' column from relational DB onto the Gen5, Location column from Essbase?
I think it does not work.Right?Hi,
I am not sure if you are talking about the length(as in varchar(128)) of the member value being different in different sources, or the member itself is different in both the sources.
I am still assuming, that you are referring to the members not same in both the sources.If it is, the whole concept of federation is based on conforming dimensions. So, it needs that the same dimension information is present in both the sources and then only, you know we can analyze the numbers based on this dimension. So, either the dimension being different in both sources, or the members not present in both the dimensions might lead to incorrect numbers.
So I select Store Attributes in relation DB and Location in ESSBASE in physical layer, then create the physical join, such as right("Hour Sales"."H_Sales".""."H_Sales"."Gen6,Location",4) = "Authorization".""."EDW"."T_EDW_MDM_STORE"."US_CODE", then drag the OPEN_DATE and CLOSE_DATE in relation DB to Location in ESSBASE in BMM,finially drag them into presentation layer.We create physical layer relationships, to send over the same relation to the underlying database during querying. So, creating a physical relationship between essbase cube and relation database would not help here.
When you set up this federation, BI Server sends individual queries to each source and maps the conforming dimension members internally.
Hope I was clear, and this helps.
Thank you,
Dhar

Relationship between events, Methods,Container, & workflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for