Relationship between SAP R/3 and XI

Hi
I have a question. What kindoff relationship exists between an R/3 system and XI system. Is it 1:1 or 1:many.
Lets say i have a requirement where i have one r/3 system and 3 EAI system. I want to generate an idoc or rfc from a single r/3 which has to go through all the 3 EAI systems. Is it possible. If so how do i achieve it.
If not why is it so.
I was having a debate on this with my colleague at my work-place and i would like to hear from you all as to what your opinion is about this.
regards
Sameer

Hi Sameer,
it is no problem to implement an n:m relationship between systems. For example, you can have one R/3 sending an material master IDoc, configure in the receiver determination that this IDoc should go to 3 different receivers, than define for each receiver the interface as expected by the receiver (of course you will have to implement the payload mappings) and than choose three different adapters for sending the messages.
regards, frank

Similar Messages

The relationship between SAP BusinessObjects XI 4.0 and WebIntelligence 6

A lot of APIs in Rebean\ Report Engine Java SDK are disfunctional in BI 4.0 and there is no replacement.
[Rebean Developer Guide|http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir4/en/xi4_resdk_java_dg_en.pdf] say:
SAP BusinessObjects XI 4.0 release, the Report Engine SDK does not support the following features:
u2022 Drilling in Web Intelligence documents
u2022 Building queries
u2022 Document and report editing
in [BI 4.0 Javadoc|http://help.sap.com/javadocs/bip/40/re/en/com/businessobjects/rebean/wi/package-summary.html]
there are a lot of javadoc with warning Warning: This interface is no longer functional from the SAP BusinessObjects XI 4.0 release onwards
I found another [Java doc for WebIntelligence 6.x|http://help.sap.com/javadocs/boe/xi/re/en/overview-summary.html].
http://help.sap.com/javadocs/boe/xi/re/en/overview-summary.html
This documentation covers the REBean Java SDK. The REBean SDK allows you to work with ** documents and explore the metadata layer.
not supported by 4.x,but supported by 6.x?
what's the relationship between SAP BusinessObjects XI 4.0 and WebIntelligence 6.x?
What version of WebIntelligence used by SAP BusinessObjects XI 4.0 ?

Web Intelligence 6.x is an old product that is currently out of support.
Crystal Enterprise 10 and BusinessObjects 6.5 were the last separate Crystal / Web Intelligence products just after BusinessObjects acquired Crystal Decisions. BusinessObjects XI was the successor to both CE 10 and BO 6.5.
It just so happens that the product name was carried over from the BusinessObjects side, but the versioning brand was carried over from the Crystal side. So 6.x doesn't mean a newer version of ReportEngine. Timeline:
ReportEngine 6.x -> ReportEngine 11 (XI R1) -> ReportEngine 11.5 (XI R2) -> ReportEngine 12 (XI 3.x) -> ReportEngine 14 (BI 4.x).
So you can see the evolution of the branding that led to the newest version being branded by the number 4.0.
The internal APIs being wrapped by ReportEngine was changed from 12 to 14, and thus not all functionality was carried over to 14.
Sincerely,
Ted Ueda

Error while adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC

Hi Gurus
We are getting the Error in NWDS while Adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC.
Steps what we are Done
1. Create the custom project from inactiveDC's
2.creating the project for the component crm/b2b in SHRAPP_1
3.After that we changed the application.xml and given the contect path.
4.Then we tried to add Dependency to the custom create DC we are getting the error saying that illegal deppendency : the compartment sap.com_CUSTCRMPRJ_1 of DC sap.com/home/b2b_xyz(sap.com.CUSTCRMPRJ_1) must explicitly use compartment sap.com_SAP-SHRWEB_1 of DC sap.com/crm/isa/ like that it was throwing the error.
so, we skip this step and tried to create the build then it is saying that build is failed..
Please help us in this regard.
Awaiting for ur quick response...
Regards
Satish

Hi
Please Ignore my above message.
Thanks for ur Response.
After ur valuble inputs we have added the required dependencies and sucessfully created the projects, then building of the projects was also sucessfully done and EAR file was created.
We need to deploy this EAR file in CRM Application Server by using the interface NWDI.
For Deploying the EAR into NWDI, we need to check-in the activites what i have created for EAR. once i check-in the activites ,the NWDI will deploy the EAR into CRM Application Server.
In the Activity Log we are able to check the Activities as Suceeded but the Deployment column is not showing any status.
When i right click on my activity Id the deployment summery is also disabled.
So finally my Question is that where can i get the deployment log file, and where can i check the deployment status for my application..
Any pointers in this regard would be of great help..
Awaiting for ur valuble Responses..
Regards
Satish

What is the differenec between 'sap list viewer' and 'abap list viewer'

hi
what is the differenec between 'sap list viewer' and 'abap list viewer'

Hi,
There is no difference between them.SAP List Viewer (ALV) is the new name of the ABAP List Viewer (ALV).
The SAP List Viewer unifies and simplifies the use of lists in the R/3 System. A uniform user interface and list format is available for all lists. This prevents redundant functions.
The SAP List Viewer can be used to view both single-level lists and multilevel sequential lists.
Single-level lists contain any number of lines that have no hierarchical relationship to each other.
Multilevel sequential lists consist of any number of lines that have two hierarchical levels. Multilevel lists have header rows and item rows; the item rows are subordinate to the header rows. For each header row there can be any number of subordinate item rows.
You can view subtotals and totals rows in both single-level lists and multilevel sequential lists
From End User Point it is SAP LIST viewer , From Developer Point of View it is ALV .
Check the Below Link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/66/bc7aab43c211d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
Satish

Difference Between SAP R/3 and SAP CRM

hi firends,
Iam new to the SAP world.What is the difference between
SAP R/3 and SAP CRM.
What are the additional services provided by the SAP CRM?
How it does differs from R/3?
Can any one guide me.
Thanks in Advance
Ganga Prasad

Hello,
I think the best start is to look at the:
- <a href="http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/crm/featuresfunctions/index.epx">mySAP Customer Relationship Management: Features & Functions</a>
- <a href="http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/featuresfunctions/index.epx">mySAP ERP: Features & Functions</a>
also the help at http://help.sap.com/ could be very valuable:
- <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40sr1/helpdata/en/1a/023d63b8387c4a8dfea6592f3a23a7/frameset.htm">mySAP Customer Relationship Management</a>
- <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm">SAP ERP Central Component, Release 5.0, SR1</a>
Regards
Gregor

Relationship between TRANSACTION DOCUMENT Nu00BA and REQUEST/TASK

Dear Gurus
I've created an change request - urgent correction and this assined to ID (Transaction Document Nº) = for example 8000001285.
The next step is create the Request/Task relationship with this ID.
I need to generate report that have relationship between Transaction Document Nº and Request/Task, but I need to know the tables that save this information.
Could you please help me?
LASAM

Thanks,
SAP is working to make the two technologies comparable, as we can see also from products like [SAP Application Interface Framework|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_aif10/helpdata/en/5a/3eacf824e74542abbd2271238dc70b/frameset.htm] so I ask to the community if somebody find how the linking between the business document and ABAP proxies is implemented
Regards

Difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0

hi frnds
.what is the difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0?
regards

Hi,
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
Goods receipt
Goods issue
Transfer posting
Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location
Regards
Priyanka.P
AWARD IF HELPFULL

Delta functionality between SAP 4.7 and ECC 6

Hi All,
Can anyone please provide me with any documents or links on delta functionality between SAP 4.7 and ECC 6.0 in MM/WM.
Any information would be helpful.
Regards
Prashant

Hello
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
Goods receipt
Goods issue
Transfer posting
Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with "Non-Hierarchy" display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location.
If u want to know more go through the following links
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
http://help.sap.com/saphelperp2005vp/helpdata/en/43/6880cbb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm_
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERP6/ERP2005+Upgrade
check following
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/html/U40_EN_IN.htm
for more help check following
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/BBlibrary_start.htm
Go through the following link for the Delta functionality notes
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
Regards
Priyanka.P

Getting Error The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed in SharePoint 2010

Hi,
SharePoint 2010 Backup has been taken from production and restored through Semantic Tool in one of the server.The wepapplication of which the backup was taken is working fine.
But the problem is that the SharePoint is not working correctly.We cannot create any new webapplication ,cannot navigate to the ServiceApplications.aspx page it shows error.Even the Search and UserProfile Services of the existing Web Application is not working.Checking
the SharePoint Logs I found out the below exception
11/30/2011 12:14:53.78 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x2D24 SharePoint Foundation         Database
8u1d High    Flushing connection pool 'Data Source=urasvr139;Initial Catalog=SharePoint_Config;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Connect Timeout=15'
11/30/2011 12:14:53.78 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x2D24 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
2myf Medium Enabling the configuration filesystem and memory caches.
11/30/2011 12:14:53.79 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x12AC SharePoint Foundation         Database
8u1d High    Flushing connection pool 'Data Source=urasvr139;Initial Catalog=SharePoint_Config;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Connect Timeout=15'
11/30/2011 12:14:53.79 WebAnalyticsService.exe (0x06D4)        0x12AC SharePoint Foundation         Topology
2myf Medium Enabling the configuration filesystem and memory caches.
11/30/2011 12:14:55.54 mssearch.exe (0x0864)                   0x2B24 SharePoint Server Search      Propagation Manager
fo2s Medium [3b3-c-0 An] aborting all propagation tasks and propagation-owned transactions after waiting 300 seconds (0 indexes) [indexpropagator.cxx:1607] d:\office\source\search\native\ytrip\tripoli\propagation\indexpropagator.cxx
11/30/2011 12:14:55.99 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
75dz High    The SPPersistedObject with
Name User Profile Service Application, Id 9577a6aa-33ec-498e-b198-56651b53bf27, Parent 13e1ef7d-40c2-4bcb-906c-a080866ca9bd failed to initialize with the following error: System.SystemException: The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted
domain failed.       at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.TranslateToNTAccounts(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Boolean& someFailed)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection
sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAce`1.get_PrincipalName()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1.Add(String princip...
11/30/2011 12:14:55.99* OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
75dz High    ...alName, String displayName, Byte[] securityIdentifier, T grantRightsMask, T denyRightsMask)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1..ctor(String persistedAcl)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedObject.Initialize(ISPPersistedStoreProvider
persistedStoreProvider, Guid id, Guid parentId, String name, SPObjectStatus status, Int64 version, XmlDocument state)
11/30/2011 12:14:56.00 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Topology
8xqx High    Exception in RefreshCache. Exception message :The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.
11/30/2011 12:14:56.00 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Timer
2n2p Monitorable The following error occured while trying to initialize the timer: System.SystemException: The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.       at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.TranslateToNTAccounts(IdentityReferenceCollection
sourceSids, Boolean& someFailed)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type
targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAce`1.get_PrincipalName()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1.Add(String principalName, String displayName, Byte[] securityIdentifier, T grantRightsMask,
T denyRightsMask)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administrati...
11/30/2011 12:14:56.00* OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1DF4)                   0x1994 SharePoint Foundation         Timer
2n2p Monitorable ...on.SPAcl`1..ctor(String persistedAcl)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplication.OnDeserialization()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedObject.Initialize(ISPPersistedStoreProvider persistedStoreProvider, Guid id, Guid parentId, String name, SPObjectStatus status, Int64 version, XmlDocument state)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.GetObject(Guid
id, Guid parentId, Guid type, String name, SPObjectStatus status, Byte[] versionBuffer, String xml)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.GetObject(SqlDataReader dr)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.RefreshCache(Int64
currentVe...
Please guide me on the above issue ,this will be of great help
Thanks.

I have same error. Verified for trust , ports , cleaned up cache.. nothing has helped.
The problem is caused by User profile Synch Service:
UserProfileProperty_WCFLogging :: ProfilePropertyService.GetProfileProperties Exception: System.SystemException:
The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.       at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.TranslateToNTAccounts(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids,
Boolean& someFailed)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type
targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAce`1.get_PrincipalName()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1.Add(String principalName, String displayName, SPIdentifierType identifierType, Byte[]
identifier, T grantRightsMask, T denyRigh...
08/23/2014 13:00:20.96*        w3wp.exe (0x2204)
        0x293C        SharePoint Portal Server              User Profiles
        eh0u        Unexpected        ...tsMask)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAcl`1..ctor(String persistedAcl)
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplication.get_SerializedAdministratorAcl()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplication.GetProperties()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfilePropertyService.GetProfileProperties()
Please let me know if you any solution found for this?
Regards,
Kunal

Connection between SAP R/3 and SAP XI with RFC

Hi Experts,
I am beginner in SAP XI.
We are using SAP XI 3.0 SP 9 and SAP R/3 4.6 C
I am trying to validate a connection between SAP R/3 and SAP XI with RFC.
I followed all the weblogs ,and i did exactly the same way, but I am unsucessful...
Schema not available Exception
com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.CPAException: Schema not available for RFC|3b787a8035c111d6bbe0efe50a1145a5|http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
at com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.cache.directory.DirectoryDataSAXHandler.endElement(DirectoryDataSAXHandler.java:262)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.handlers.SAXDocHandler.endElement(SAXDocHandler.java:154)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanEndTag(XMLParser.java:1826)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanElement(XMLParser.java:1722)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanContent(XMLParser.java:2298)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanElement(XMLParser.java:1719)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.scanDocument(XMLParser.java:2701)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.XMLParser.parse0(XMLParser.java:162)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.AbstractXMLParser.parseAndCatchException(AbstractXMLParser.java:126)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.AbstractXMLParser.parse(AbstractXMLParser.java:136)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.AbstractXMLParser.parse(AbstractXMLParser.java:209)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser.parseWithoutSchemaValidationProcessing(Parser.java:270)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser.parse(Parser.java:331)
at com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:125)
at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:345)
at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:143)
at com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.cache.directory.DirectoryDataParser.updateCentralCache(DirectoryDataParser.java:54)
at com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.cache.CacheManager.updateCacheWithDirectoryData(CacheManager.java:713)
at com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.cache.CacheManager.performCacheUpdate(CacheManager.java:595)
at com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.cache.CacheManager$CacheUpdateRunnable.run(CacheManager.java:440)
at com.sap.engine.frame.core.thread.Task.run(Task.java:60)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl5.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:73)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl5.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:145)
Please help me out on this
Thanks in advance
Raju

hi,
try refreshing you CAP cache:
741214 (check this note)
and check if the refresh was successful
(CPA history)
Regards,
michal

Secure Communication between SAP R/3 and SAP portal(WAS Java)

Hi All,
We have a requirement where client says ,there needs to be a SSL tunnel established between SAP R/3 and Portal(through ITS) to access R/3 through portal
Do we have to use SSL for that or SNC?I heard SNC is a mechanism which have to be used here since it uses DIAG protocol to connect but not Http.Is it true?Kindly give some more ideas on this.
Other thing is to do this they need to open a port between for using Firewall.Can you guide which SAP port has to be open for this connection?
Thanks In Advance
Regards
Rani A

Hi Rani,
what the ITS Admin is, is explained in the docs to the <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/28611e0bd26493e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm">ITS Admin Tool</a>. This also includes how to access it.
Usually specifiying the ABAP backend is done by maintaining the <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/2b67fe369b060ae10000000a155369/frameset.htm">Global Service File Parameters</a>.
The <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/2aa8081a3a060ae10000000a155369/frameset.htm">SNC configuration</a> is part of the <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/2a95a61a3a060ae10000000a155369/frameset.htm">Security Configuration</a> and also done in the ADM instance of the ITS.
Regards,
Patrick

Difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow

Hello guys,
Is there any difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow?
Are there others workflows types in SAP?
In all SAP Workflow Courses (BIT600, BIT601, BIT603, BIT610) only was talked about SAP Business Workflow, and nothing about CRM Workflow.
Thanks a lot!
Kleber

Hello Kleber,
There is not much of the differance between CRM workflows and SAP Business workflows..
Workflows are esentially part of Basis (BC) components and hence its the same across all SAP products as all these products have components of Basis(BC) in them...
To Conclude, SAP Busines workflows and CRM workflows are the same things... However when you work on CRM, the BOR objects would be belonging to CRM and not to ECC... However conceptwise , there in no change at all.. If you learn BIT100......, you can also work on CRM workflows..
Regards,
Anand

Purchase price difference between SAP R/3 and BWI report

Hi
Purchase price difference between SAP R/3 and BWI report
What is purchase price variance ?, my user is telling that in SAP R/3, purchase price variance 100 and in BWI report it is 200 .
Any other terminologies are there for purchase price variance ?
And any idea wherefrom BWI will take this purchase price variance ?
Thanks In advance

Purchase price variance is he difference in price between the amount paid to the supplier and the planned or standard cost of that item
Request you to check your data first in your Cube/ODS, better would be to check in the data container where the data is first loaded.
Also check if this field is getting directly loaded as 1-to-1 mapping.

Connectivity between SAP ECC system and SAP BI

Connectivity between SAP ECC system and SAP BI
Hi BI-experts!
I would like to load e.g. transaction data from SAP ECC system into SAP BI system.
The Loading process is hanging in processing step u201CSERVICE APIu201D.
The process in hanging in status "yellow" and then changed after a while to status u201Credu201D.
[0FI_AR_4 |http://www.file-upload.net/view-1447743/0FI_AR_4.jpg.html ]
The following steps within Load process are yellow and then red:
Extraction (messages): Missing messages
Missing message: Request received
Missing message: Number of sent records
Missing message: Selection completed
Transfer (IDocs and TRFC): Missing messages or warnings
Request IDoc : Application document posted (is green)
Data Package 1 : arrived in BW ; Processing : 2nd processing step not yet finished
Info IDoc 1 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Info IDoc 2 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Info IDoc 3 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Info IDoc 4 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Subseq. processing (messages) : Missing messages
Missing message: Subseq. processing completed
DataStore Activation (Change Log) : not yet activated
Question:
Can some one tell me whether my distribution model or other settings are wrong?
I created 2 distribution model (BD64), one from SAP BW system and other from SAP BI system with message types RSRQST, RSINFO, RSSEND
Thank you very much!

Hi Holger.
this issue is related to the RFC but not the one which is communicating from BI to R/3 rather the one which is communicating from R/3 to BI follow these steps.
1. check your BI system logical name from the myself source system.
2. go the ECC and run the transaction sm59
3. go the ABAP Connection folder and search for your RFC which name would be by default as per your BI logical system name.
4. double click it and edit it now check whether the Target hostname or ip is OK.
5. In the logon tab check the client number User and password settings.
Save it and test it with both Connection Test and Remote Logon.
if every thing work fine i hope your problem will be solved.
kind regards,
Zeeshan

IDoc structure mismatch between SAP R/3 and PI

Hi,
There is an interface in PI which receives IDoc from SAP R/3 system. I have been facing an issue of IDoc structure mismatch (in terms of data present in it) between SAP R/3 and when PI receives the IDoc.
To be more precise,
In SAP R/3 system, the value ABC is present in the field DOCNUM in the IDoc.
But when the PI receives the same IDoc from SAP R/3 (as seen in Integration Engine), the value ABC is present in a different field and the DOCNUM field is empty.
<DOCNUM></DOCNUM>
<ARCKEY>ABC</ARCKEY>
The first step towards resolution was to delete and reimport the IDoc metadata from SAP R/3 in PI system using IDX2, which did not help in this case.
Could anyone please help in resolving the field mismatch between the IDoc triggered from SAP R/3 and the IDoc received by PI.
Regards,
Prajeet

Hi Prajeet,
it's long ago but your question has not been finally solved, so let me try to give you an answer. We are facing the same problem after patching our PI.
I think the reason for the different behaviour is related to SAP note 1233908, where SAP has changed the IDoc adapter.
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1233908
Regards,
Lars

Relationship between SAP R/3 and XI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for