Relationship btween object in h.r

hellow i have a work in hr (abap)and i wont to learn about the relationship between objects in h.r like(objid,sobid,pernr...). if some one now about pdf or something else that can help i will appraise it .
(some one told me about the book hr 50 but i dont have it so i dont now) thanks ahead .

Hi,
The pdf in the following link gives an overview of org. object and their relationshipd. For detailed help refer help.sap.com.
http://www.purdue.edu/onepurdue/contribute_pdf/overview-of_om_objects.pdf
Thanks,
Prasath N

Similar Messages

No activation of relationship to object S 55000321 in pl.version 55000321 (

Hi experts,
I am getting this error while transporting the Change request.
" No activation of relationship to object S 55000321 in pl.version 55000321 (cl.610) "
Please advise.
Regards,
Tomesh

Hello Sikandar,
Q.1. I am coming across the same error as above. I tried runnig RHWFACTI but when I run it it says "No entried Exist for activation". Can you please advise if some thing is missing?
Q.2 . Is this the reason, that when I hire a person I am unable to view the Position's description(Text) on Infotype 0000 but just the Position ID.
Regards,
Kadir

Relationship between Objects Not Found in PA

Dear all,
I have uploaded objects (Org Unit, Job, and Position) and the relationships between objects separately using LSMW.
When i checked the update of the relationship between objects in PA30, but the relationship between objects (Org Unit, Job, and Position) did not exist, yet exists in PP02.
I tried to upload the relationships between objects using holder (A008) in LSMW again, still I could not find the relationships in PA30, but exist in PP02.
Then I tried to run rhinte00 and rhinte30 to link the relationship between objects. I managed to get through rhinte00, but failed to run rhinte30.
Below is the report log when I tried to run rhinte30.
Report log:
Processing mode:   Processing successful
Number of personnel nos. selected :   0
Personnel numbers with errors:

Check the following.
1. Check if integration is active in T77S0 table PLOGI PLOGI = Your active plan version & PLOGI ORGA = X
2. Check if all your objects are created with this active plan version
3. Check the feature PLOGI to see if your PA PSA etc for the employee are integrated.
cheers
Ajay

No activation of relationship to object RY 50000049 in pl.version 50000049

Hi experts,
I am new to HR.
I have deleted a user assignment to a position and assigned another user to the same position.
I have released the customizing TR from Development, but when I import it to Qualty I am getting the following error:
TR log:
No activation of relationship to object RY 50000049 in pl.version 50000049
RY 50000049 in pl.version 01 does not exist -> activation not possible
No activation of relationship to object RY 50000051 in pl.version 50000051
RY 50000051 in pl.version 01 does not exist -> activation not possible
No activation of relationship to object RY 50000055 in pl.version 50000055
RY 50000055 in pl.version 01 does not exist -> activation not possible
Errors occurred during post-handling RH_ACTIVATE_PDOBJECT_AFTER_IMP for PDST T
The errors affect the following components:
BC-BMT-OM (Organizational Management)
Please suggest.
Regards,
Karthik

Hi,
Plan versions enable you to carry out various simulations and compare plans in the system in parallel. As a rule, only one plan version depicts your enterprise's current organizational plan.
Implementation Guide (IMG), under Personnel Management -Global Settings in Personnel Management -Plan Version Maintenance-Maintain Plan Versions and Set Active Plan Version in that table see which plan version is active if you are using 01 as plan version cross check is current and active plan are checked if not please check.
2. Check the switches PLOGI PLOGI shld be with 01 integration
Thanks

Help with error "No activation of relationship to object..."

Has anyone experienced this error while transporting a work flow to another environment?
"No activation of relationship to object O 55000321 in pl.version 55000321"
Please help resolve.

Hi Vincent,
How did u solve this!
Regards,
Bharat

Relationship between Object Type QK & Q

Can someone help here. I am trying to confirm if there is a relationship between object type QK (qualification group) & Q (qualification). I checked HRP1001 but did not seem to find a relationship between these two object types. Is there another table I need to check.
Thank you.

Hi,
Have you checked A/B 030?
Q A030 Is a specialization of QK
QK B030 Is a generalization of Q
The table for all relationships in general is T777E.
Hope this helps.
Donnie

Relationship btween hrp1000 hrp1001

hallow i new in h.r and i wont to no the relationship between object (ex. objid sobid pernr ) and if you have an simple example it will be best for me .(visual example all so will help) becuse i am very confused. tankers for your time

Hi,
HRP1000 table is Object table where you get the basic details of the objects its name & validity dates.
HRP1001 table is Relationship table where all the relationship against that object is maintained.
Now object may be 'P' -> Person
                             'O' -> Organizational Unit
                             'S' -> Position
                             'K' -> Costcenter
Relationship can be 'A008' Holder
                             'A003' Belongs to
                             'A002' Reports to
                             'A012' Manges
Best way to understand this goto Tcode PP01, take one position then click on Relationship & display all its realtionships. Now all these relationship details are store in HRP1001 table.
Now in HRP1001 table,
otype is object type for e.g. 'S'
objid is nothing but object number which is 8 digit for e.g Postion number
Sobid is the relationship object number which is 8 digit
          for e.g Costcenter('K') or can be Person ('P').
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Sarika.

Custom: use constant value in relationship between objects?

I have two related classes:
* Class A uses application identity, and has multiple PK fields, PK1 and
PK2.
* Class B has a 1-many relationship with class A. However, class B's
database table only has a column that relates to Class A's PK2 column.
(the PK1 value is a constant) for all Class B objects).
I have no idea how to express this relationship via kodo. Can anyone
assist?

What I've chosen to do is add a new DB column to my table which has a
constant value (ie: is the same for every row). Then I can join with it.
I'd request this simple feature to be added in a future release: the
ability to specify a literarl constant value as part of the join
criteria in the metadata. It could be very easily added: instead of
specifying a column containing the join value, you could put the literal
into the .jdo file.
thanks.
Patrick Linskey wrote:
You could put together a custom field mapping that performed the join
like you described if you really wanted to. Bear in mind, however, that
the field mapping APIs are subject to change etc. etc. etc.
-Patrick
On Tue, 20 May 2003 22:25:16 -0400, David Michaels wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply, as usual Abe.
In this case, I will link to the full PK of the related object, just one
of the components of that PK is a constant. There's no place to
override the SQL used for these sort of joins?
Perhaps I can do this with a view too.
Abe White wrote:
It's not possible to create a Kodo relation that doesn't actually link
to the (full) primary key of the related object. Note that in general,
that kind of database design is not a good idea, because there's no
guarantee you're linking to a unique object.
You can use a Kodo query to get the related objects; you could hide the
query behind your getter method.

Display relationships between objects

I've been tasked/ proposed to deliver a new project involving
two displayObjects... say 2 squares. Between those squares, I need
to show a connecting relationship of hierarchy. So, I need to have
a visual line connecting the 2 objects.
Does anyone know if there is already a class for this in Flex
or what I might use to demo this quickly. Never done this sort of
data visualization before, but the math can't be to hard.

"jwoozy" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:g96kmn$80o$[email protected]..
> I've been tasked/ proposed to deliver a new project
involving two
> displayObjects... say 2 squares. Between those squares,
I need to show a
> connecting relationship of hierarchy. So, I need to have
a visual line
> connecting the 2 objects.
>
> Does anyone know if there is already a class for this in
Flex or what I
> might
> use to demo this quickly. Never done this sort of data
visualization
> before,
> but the math can't be to hard.
>
I think there is something here
http://flexbox.mrinalwadhwa.com/,
but I
don't have time to search through it for you.
HTH;
Amy

Urgent: Many to many relationship with Objects

create type c1 as object (id varchar2(5),
descr varchar2(200))
create table c1_otab of c1(id primary key) object id primary key;
create type c2 as object (id varchar2(5), descr varchar2(200), cat1 ref c1)
I want a many to many relation between c1 and c2.
How do I create an object table of c2 having id,cat1.id as primary key?
Thanks

Mina,
As with relational tables, you can create a third table that has 1-n relationship with these two object tables. With 'cat1' as a REF attribute, an instance of c2 in c2_otab points to a c1 instance in c1_otab through the OID column. There is no need to explicitly create primary/foreign key. In fact, to prevent dangling REFs, the REF column should be declared as foreign key pointing to c1_otab.id (i.e. the primary key).
Regards,
Geoff
create type c1 as object (id varchar2(5),
descr varchar2(200))
create table c1_otab of c1(id primary key) object id primary key;
create type c2 as object (id varchar2(5), descr varchar2(200), cat1 ref c1)
I want a many to many relation between c1 and c2.
How do I create an object table of c2 having id,cat1.id as primary key?
Thanks

Help needed: modeling master-detail relationship using Object types

I would like to use object types to model a master-detail relationship. For e.g.
create or replace type detail_t as object
(id number,
name varchar2(20)
create or replace type details_t as
table of detail_t
create or replace type master_t as object
(id number,
name varchar2(20),
details details_t
If I don't use database object-tables, how can I return multiple master rows of the type above from a PL/SQL procedure? Can I return a cursor of some sort?
I'm using Oracle 8.1.7.
Thanks,
Niranja

Niranjan,
After the object types are defined, your data would come from either object tables or object views. In your case, to get multiple master rows, simply query the object view.
Regards,
Geoff

Relationship between objects and information stored in a database

I've got a question that's pretty broad... but maybe someone can help with it.
I'm writing a couple of classes, one called "Customer" and the other "Store". Store can contain any number of customers, which it keeps in an array. A customer object has name and address fields, as well as an array of the current movies the customer has checked out. A third "Driver" class has the main method which calls the other two classes. When a new customer is created, it is put into the array in an object of store, and written to disk in a file named with the customer's ID number.
My question is, I'm not really sure how objects tie in with the actual database on the hard disk. For example, if I run the program once and add 3 customers, all three get written to disk, and exist in memory as objects. However, when I exit the program, I lose all 3 of those objects from the array of customers in the store object.
So, when I run the program a second time, the array is gone, though the customer information remains on disk. I have methods to delete/add customer objects to an object of store, but those don't do me any good without the array in memory. I thought that I could just load all data from disk, and put them back into the array, but isn't that inefficient if the database is very large? Is there a better way to deal with this?
I hope that was reasonably clear. I'd appreciate any help. Thanks.

i would make the store a manager of the customer objects whose
responsibilities include read and writing the objects as well as caching
them.
here is some sample code for this.
public class Customer(){
int id;
/* the id field is the unique identifier for each Customer.
     this field should probably be our primary key in our database
     table. you don't have to use a number but whatever it is it
     needs to be unique */
boolean updated;
public Customer(int customerId){
    id = customerId;
    updated = false;
public int getCustomerId(){
    return id;
/* if the customer object has been changed and needs to flushed back
     to the database this returns true. */
public boolean needsFlushing(){
    return updated;
/* and your other methods go here... */
}and now for the Store...
public class Store{
private Customer[] cache;
public Store(){
    cache = new Customer[10];
    /* here i have hard coded as 10, you could change this or for more
       flexibility use a Vector or such. */
/* spin through the cache and return the matching customer. if the
     customer is not in the cache load it in the database. */
public Customer getCustomer(int customerId)throws SQLException{
    for(int j=0;j<cache.length;j++){
      if((cache[j]!=null)&&(cache[j].getCustomerId()==customerId)){
        return cache[j];
    Customer c = loadCustomer(customerId);
    addToCache(c);
    return c;
public void addCustomer(Customer c)throws SQLException{
    /* adds a new (non-existing customer) */
    saveCustomer(c);
    addToCache(c);
public void close()throws SQLException{
    /* flushes back any updated customers */
    for(int j=0;j<cache.length;j++){
      if((cache[j]!=null)&&(cache[j].needsFlushing())){
        saveCustomer(cache[j]);
    cache = null;
private Customer loadCustomer(int customerId)throws SQLException{
    /* here would be code for loading a customer object from the
       database that matches the customerId. */
    return new Customer(customerId);//temporary
private void saveCustomer(Customer c)throws SQLException{
    /* here would be the code for saving the customer c into the
       database */
private void addToCache(Customer c){
    /* this method adds the customer c to the cache. it may have to
       to remove an older customer from the cache to do this. i leave
       the algorithm for deciding this up to you */

How do I create parent/child relationship between objects? so that if I change one, I change all

I have multiple instances of an object, and I would like to make any changes that I put on one of these objects to perpetuate and change on the other instances of the object

turn your object into a symbol, and place multiple instances of it on the artboard, when you edit the symbol all instances will update.

Problem in Assigning Relationships (Org Mgmt)

Hi,
The system does not show (neither through PPIS or through PPOME) organizational structure when I create A003 (Belongs to) relationship between organizational units (Object Key 'O'). The same is shown when I change relationship to A002 (Reports to).
Moreover, system does not show (in PPOME & PPIS) positions that are assigned A003 relationship with object key 'O', but the same is shown when this relationship is changed to A002.
Now, a position is supposed to report to a super position & for which relationship has to be A002 (Reports to). But when this is assigned, the system does not show it throguh PPOME / PPIS.
What shall I do to fix the problem? Moreover, can anyone tell me which tables store the OM Objects (i.e. OUs, Positions, Work Centers, Jobs, Persons & Relationships)
Rgds,
Tapan Shah

Hi,
The display characteristics of PPOME is determined by evaluation path SBESX.
Please check table T778A.
You may change the relationships displayed using this table.
However, this display behavior is determined due to some logic and think twice before changing the standard system.
As of your requirement, 002 relationship can be used btw O objects instead of 003, why do you want the second?
And the tables for OM objects are basically HRP1000 (object names, etc), HRP1001 (relationships)
Regards,
Dilek

Question for making Report of Custom Object(01)

We use Custom Object 01 for Comment under the Calendar(Activity) Screen.
- Objective :
1. We want to manage Comment that are made by Manager after closing Sales Activity
2. But, we can't manage Comment history in Calendar(Activity) Details because it is remained Last Comment in Details
3. So, we use Custom Object 01 for Comment
- Problem & Question :
1. We can manage Comment history under Calendar(Activity) Screen
2. But, we can't make Report Comment Report related with Account, Contact
3. So, we want to know
a. Are there no relationship Custom Object 01(Comment) with Account, Contact in Calendar(Activity) Screen
b. If we have to make Comment Report related with Account, Contact, how to make it?
Please let me know about that issue.... Thank You!!!

Your question is not clear. Do you want CO 1 to be related to Account, Contact and Activity? Or not? And what exactly is the reporting question?
Custom Object 1 is available for Real-Time reports. The Custom Object 1 subject area allows you to report on CO along with the related Accounts, Activities, Contacts, Leads, Opportunities, and Service Requests.

Relationship btween object in h.r

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for