Release in college web site?

Hi,
I'm an university student.
Can I use apple loops that are not just guitar samples or synth sounds, bass sounds.... but an independent, individual song for my final project?
In other words, I'd like to use apple loop, sample song as soundtrack in my video project which will be upload on class website. Is it possible? That's not, never! used for a commercial.
Is it a violation of federal copyright law?
This is a very important matter to me, so I wish ur thoughtful responses.
Thank u, folks in advance!

Are you referring to the "jingles" included with Apple Loops? Or an artist's song?
If the former, all of Apple's loops are royalty-free, so that won't be an issue. If it's an artist's song, then yes, there are definitely copyright implications to using other's works without licensing or permission.
(Although if it's for a class project and won't have a life outside of the class, I doubt you'd run into any serious trouble).

Similar Messages

  • I installed the update and now my firefox is very slow and mixing up everything I press on the online college web site I have been using just fine since Feb. Now it won't download the stuff I need and turns the pages white. Help

    Firefox is extremely slow and I am having trouble opening my college web site.

    Firefox is extremely slow and I am having trouble opening my college web site.

  • What is causing safari to lock up every time I try to access my college web site

    What is causing safari to lock up every time I try to access my college web site.....all other sites work fine

    Had to say.
    What is your college website?

  • Errors on my web site started with Flash Player Release a few days ago (Mar 28, 2012)

    Hi,
    I have a Flash based video player on my website.  This was designed and implemented based on an article vy Lisa Larson-Kelley.  It has run flawlessly for several years.  But, when I installed the lastest release of Flash Player a fedw days ago (Mar 28, 2012), I am now getting really annoying issues with the Flash Video Player.
    I expect that I will need to place insturctions for users on how to roll back their version of Flash Player, since this latest version is broken.
    But, many of the people who visit my site are not tech oriented (they are mostly friends and family, so, I don't expect that they will really roll back their version of Flash player.
    I am 100% certain the issue is the latest version of Flash, since these errors never occurred until I installed the latest version. 
    On my work laptop, I have an older version of Flas (10.x.x) and this probelm does not happen.  On my desktop PC at home, I have an older version of Flash 11 installed, and this problem does not happen (in IE9).  The version of Flash PLayer 11 where the issue does *not* occur is 11.1.102.63.
    On that same desktop PC, if I use Chrome, (which automatically defaults to the latest version of Flash which is 11.2.202.228, I get the problems.  So, there is no question that the issue is with the latest version of Flash and not my hardware or drivers.  I get the same problems on three different computers.
    My website has a username and password.  If someone from Adobe wants to replicate the problem send me an e-mail and I will send you the username and password.
    The videoplayer on my website is at this url:  http://www.jjjhi.com/TryMakingFlashVidPlayer/VideoPlaylist.html (but, you will need the username and password).
    The issue is that sometimes (not always) when you select a video to play, inistead of the video loading into the panel as it should (sized as 1025 x 578), instead, all you see is the control skin.  The video begins to play, but all you get is the audio.  It looks like this:
    You can recover from this error by using the skin control to make the image full screen, but, the video looks poor at fulls screen, because it is created at 1024 x 578.  You can then get the correct size by returning from full screen, but, I don't want the pepole who visit my cif\deo playet to have to go all through that.  Especially since most won't even know enough to try making the video full screen.
    This doesn't happen for every video on my web site, but, once it *does* happen once...it will happen for every video selection you make.
    This is unacceptable, and it absolutely a function of Flash version 11.2.202.228.
    Adobe:  Please fix this bug as soon as possible.
    I've implemented an HTML5 based video player and have begun populating it with mp4 versions of my video clips, but, quite honestly, the playback using HTML5 is much worse than with Flash.  I encoded the clips in the HTML5 player with the same Variable Bit Rates as in the F4V clips, and, in the HTML5 player, there are missed frames, and the audio can get out of sync.  So, I *want* to keep using my Flash Based video player, but...if Adobe doesn;t fix this, I will just dial down my VBR till I find one that is slow enough to play in HTML5 and ditch Flash.
    My HTML5 video player is here:
    http://www.jjjhi.com/TryMakingNewVideoPlayer/NewVidPlayer_option1_jth.html
    (again you need the username and password to use it, send me an e-mail and I will give them to you, I just don't want to post them in an open forum).
    Here is a bitmap of the page:  It is quite snazzy looking and is based on an excellent class from Chris Converse at Lynda.com.  But, even though it is 'snazzy looking' the HTML5 player performs poorly on an under-powered machine (like my work laptop).  It uses 100% CPU and misses frames and the audio loses sync.  The same videos encoded with the same VBR for Flash (F4V) play great, *except for the new issue described above!!!!)
    I Adobe can fix this issue with Flash Player 11.2.202.228  ASAP, else, I will  have to 'downgrade' to an HTML5 based video player, that, quite honestly does not perform as well as Flash.
    If you want to reproduce the problem contact me at my e-mail address: [email protected] and I'll send you the username and password.
    You can then prove that the problem does not exist with prior version of Flash player (before 11.2.202.228) but *does* exist with this latest buggy release.
    Thanks,
    John

    Thanks.
    I sent the username and PW to you and Chris.
    Cheers,
    John

  • Is there any college or university that offers a course on Web Site Building using I Web?

    Is there any college or university that offers a course on Web Site Building using I Web? 

    Check with your local Apple store for the next workshop for iWeb.  It'll be a hands on session learning to use iWeb. It'll be more technical than design oriented.
    OT

  • With Firefox 7, no "What's New" or "Release Notes" can be found anywhere in the app or on the web site!

    With Firefox 7, no "What's New" or "Release Notes" can be found anywhere in the app or on the web site! I just updated my software to version 7, but I can't find out why I should have done it, or what has changed.

    They had to suspend the release of 7.0 and quickly update it to 7.0.1 after some problems. <br>.<br>
    ''"We’ve identified an issue in which some users may have one or more of their add-ons hidden after upgrading to the latest Firefox version, affecting both desktop and mobile. These add-ons and their data are still intact and haven’t actually been removed. We paused new updates to Firefox to minimize the potential impact on users ... " from http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2011/09/28/issue-discovered-with-firefox-add-on-upgrades/
    * http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/7.0/releasenotes/
    *http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/7.0.1/releasenotes/

  • Release Management 2013 Server Web Site throwing "Data at the root level is invalid..." error after applying RM 2013 Update 4

    I upgraded our RM Server from 2013 Update 2 to Update 4. During smoke testing, I discovered that the RM approval website would get stuck and display a loading wheel when showing the list of releases. After rebooting the server and uninstalling and reinstalling,
    I eventually got it to load the web site just fine, however the windows event log is displaying thousands of instances of the same error (about once a second).
    Timestamp: 4/2/2015 2:25:05 PM
    Message: Data at the root level is invalid. Line 2, position 1.: \r\n\r\n   at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.Throw(Exception e)
       at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.Throw(String res, String arg)
       at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.ParseRootLevelWhitespace()
       at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.ParseDocumentContent()
       at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.Read()
       at System.Xml.Linq.XDocument.Load(XmlReader reader, LoadOptions options)
       at System.Xml.Linq.XDocument.Parse(String text, LoadOptions options)
       at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Release.Common.ExtensionMethods.XmlExtensionMethods.ToXDocument(String value, Boolean preserveWhitespace)
       at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Release.Common.Helpers.WebServiceHelper.ExtractWebMethod(String pathInfo, Stream inputStream)
    Category: General
    Priority: -1
    EventId: 0
    Severity: Error
    Title:
    Machine: [Server Name]
    Application Domain: /LM/W3SVC/2/ROOT-1-130724725961138960
    Process Id: 3448
    Process Name: C:\Windows\SysWOW64\inetsrv\w3wp.exe
    Win32 Thread Id: 1136
    Thread Name:
    Extended Properties:
    This is quite concerning because it leads me to think something else is wrong.  I read somewhere else that .Net Framework 4.5.1 is required for RM, but the system requirements on MSDN don't mention that.  Any help greatly appreciated.
    Specs:
    RM Server: Windows 2012 R2
    Release Management 2013 Update 4
    Connect to TFS Server 2013 Update 2
    We are not using HTTPS:

    Hi Joe519,
    Thanks for your post.
    And thank you for sharing  the experience here. 
    All your participation and support are very important to build such harmonious/ pleasant / learning environment for MSDN community.
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • WRT54G2 and WRT54G locks-up (freezes) when blocking web sites using Access Restrictions

    I am convinced that a few Linksys routers such as WRT54G2 and WRT54G have a major issue when blocking web sites using Access Restrictions (Internet Access Policy). After a few hours of internet access by 15 wired users the Linksys locks-up and blocks all internet web access. The only solution is to restart the power on the router.
    We are currently using a Linksys WRT54G2 v1 (firmware 1.0.04). We upgraded the WRT54G2 v1 firmware to the latest 1.0.04 version which did not resolve the issue.  NOTE: We were previosuly using a a Linksys WRT54G v1.1 (firmware 4.21.1) until the power supply blew a week after we started blocking web sites using Access Restrictions (Internet Access Policy).  
    Basically, we have a T1 internet connection and a hub connected to the Linksys router. We are trying to block several web sites such as facebook, myspace, etc. for 15 wired users. We do not use wireless connections.
    This is the 2nd time it happened with 2 different models.
    Please help ASAP.
    Thank you,
    Lance
    (Mod note: Edited post. Some parts off topic.. Thanks!)

    Also,  you have already upgrade/re-flash the firmware of your Linksys Router you need to reset and reconfigure your router from scratch. Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your router...

  • Version 3.6.6 crashes or hangs at least once a day no matter what web site I am on.

    == Issue
    ==
    Firefox is crashing or closing unexpectedly
    == Description
    ==
    At least once, if not more, Firefox version 3.6.6 crashes no matter what web site I am on.
    == Crash ID(s)
    ==
    <code>
    Report ID Date Submitted bp-46f46477-ef0b-48d6-81b4-479f92100701 7/1/2010 1:29 PM bp-f48d335f-9865-490c-a4a5-6127d2100629 6/29/2010 12:13 PM bp-39e76d38-443e-4c2f-8099-2f6152100628 6/28/2010 6:24 PM bp-52be880d-962e-4d4c-8d0d-a67b82100627 6/27/2010 10:44 AM 5e745993-930d-48a7-99a2-03d536041670 6/26/2010 12:19 PM 2a107eb7-49bb-4a19-9d5e-80b263cbbc9e 6/26/2010 12:19 PM 75c78046-d47a-40a3-93f8-aa522b21af39 6/26/2010 12:05 PM 4ed22b8b-2ed1-4b54-9400-b76138290d6d 6/26/2010 12:05 PM bp-7756d1ca-4c26-4ac0-a543-092ff2100626 6/26/2010 12:03 PM bp-2005163d-261e-4d3a-baed-2c21e2100626 6/26/2010 12:03 PM bp-f12e6798-9734-4644-9409-837122100626 6/26/2010 12:02 PM bp-563ca22d-904a-4abf-9aa4-0412f2100626 6/26/2010 12:02 PM
    </code>
    == Troubleshooting information
    ==
    Version 3.6.6 crashes or hangs at least once a day no matter what web site I am on.
    ... 0 results for Version 3.6.6 crashes or hangs at least once a day no matter what web site I am on. in English ... Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 6.1...
    == Firefox version
    ==
    3.6.6
    == Operating system
    ==
    Windows 7
    == User Agent
    ==
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
    == Plugins installed
    ==
    *-Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox and Netscape "9.3.3"
    *Default Plug-in
    *NPRuntime Script Plug-in Library for Java(TM) Deploy
    *The QuickTime Plugin allows you to view a wide variety of multimedia content in Web pages. For more information, visit the QuickTime Web site.
    *Shockwave Flash 10.1 r53
    *iTunes Detector Plug-in
    *Windows Activation Technologies Plugin for Mozilla
    *4.0.50524.0
    *Office Authorization plug-in for NPAPI browsers
    *The plug-in allows you to open and edit files using Microsoft Office applications
    *NPWLPG
    *Next Generation Java Plug-in 1.6.0_20 for Mozilla browsers

    Firefox 3.6.4 and 3.6.6 use a process called, "plugin-container.exe" which was using up most of my CPU when I opened up multiple tabs that contained Adobe Flash files, and caused Firefox to lock up.
    My solution was to use Firefox 3.5.10 which you can get from the Mozilla website at [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html]
    I am using Adobe Flash 10.1.53.64 without any problem in this version of Firefox. Check the release notes, I believe it contains all the latest security fixes in "Firefox 3.6.4".
    Hopefully, they will fix Firefox 3.6 in the next version (e.g. Firefox 3.6.7), until then you should probably use "Firefox 3.5.10".

  • After numerous display problems with version 5 affecting my job's web site, I've gone back to 3.6.18. Any dangers in this?

    My workplace's web site was recently redesigned and launched and with more recent versions of Firefox [including 5] I had both display and functionality problems I hadn't had before and that aren't happening with IE8. Everything from wrong colors to scroll bars in editing text boxes that wouldn't work unless you toggled to full page view and back, to excessively constrained columns on the main portal page. Two support people at our web site company told me they still used 3.6.18 so I uninstalled 5 and went back to 3.6.18. Some colors are still wrong [I tried the troubleshooting suggestions for that to no avail] but at least the functionality problems are gone. Firefox has been my preferred browser for several years now, but I worry about the ramifications of using such an older version.

    Going all the way back to Firefox 3.0.5 is shear foolishness, it is 14 security versions behind the last 3.0.19 release. And that version is missing at least a dozen security updates that were applied to the 3.5 and 3.6 versions after support for 3.0.x ended.
    If you are not happy with Firefox 4, you should have installed Firefox 3.6.17. That is very similar to the 3.0 and has all the security fixes that have been released since support for Firefox 3.0.x ended last year.

  • Trying to sign in on one web site, I get this message: Cancel OpenID

    The web site is for my electric bill. I have to open Safari, and sign in from there. The message I get using Fireox when I put in my user name and password is: Cancel OpenID. The web site is EPB.NET, and they have checked everything on their end and have no suggestions other than it's a browser incompatibility.
    Yes, I've deleted cookies, history, cache and such. Yes, I've disabled all extensions.
    It has been a problem for months.
    Should I just make Safari my default browser?
    Thanks for any effective help!

    You can go back to the release, but need to consider the different options.
    You may either run both versions, but they will need separate profiles. Or you may downgrade to the Release version. It would be relatively easy to copy bookmarks etc
    '''Whatever you do it is worth backing up the current profile first.'''
    * [[Back up and restore information in Firefox profiles]]
    You will want to try to use at least some of those files. Put them somewhere safe outside Firefox profile or program paths. Your Desktop or My Documents would do.
    Also if you only want to retain bookmarks the easiest method without messing with profile files is to use the backup option before you change over.
    * [[Restore bookmarks from backup or move them to another computer#w_manual-backup]]'''_manual-backup'''
    If you have both versions running with separate profiles it does have the advantage that you can take your time in migrating profile files. Here is the info on running multiple versions and profiles
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Testing_pre-release_versions#Installing_multiple_versions
    Incidentally the Firefox version & channel previously known as Aurora and now know as Developer Edition now installs by default as an additional version and installs with its own separate profiles.
    * See [[Firefox keeps crashing at startup#w_try-a-clean-install]]'''_try-a-clean-install'''
    * https://developer.mozilla.org/Firefox/Developer_Edition
    You could simply try installing Firefox 35.x over Firefox beta.
    It will probably work. But issues could occur with the profile. More generally problems will occasionally also occur with program files when downgrading.
    It would be best to do a clean install (explained in article linked above) removing the program files; and also renaming the profile folder. After installing overwrite only some of the files such as places.sqlite
    * This article goes into the fine details of what to transfer http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox#Suggested_profile_contents_to_transfer

  • Incompatible web sites, playing wmv video on mac

    I am an expert pc user switching to mac...
    I realized when I made the switch that they would be software that worked with PC that would not work with MAC. What has really surprised me, is there seems to be many web sites that will not work with MAC and its browsers.
    This started with a conversation with apple support, where they indicated there were incompatible web sites.
    My business bank stops you cold and says you have to use IE; you can ignore it and move on and it seems to work ok.
    The Walgreen pharmacy web site has a drug cost calculator that also says you must use IE, and you cannot move on.
    What really concerns me are the ones that give you no warning, but just don't work. If you go to
    http://www.dotnetnuke.com/default.aspx?tabid=777
    under the title of Video introduction:
    Mac Firefox - nothing displays for the video player
    Mac Safari - the video player displays, but the video will not play.
    PC IE - everything works as expected.
    The video format is wmv, which is an industry standard. I installed flip4mac, which is supposed to allow you to view wmv in quicktime, but it did work. Even after downloading the video (a link), I could not watch in on the mac. I had to go to a PC.
    This type of silliness is exactly why I am running from a PC. Now I am finding it prevalent on the mac.
    Question 1) specific to the wmv file format, how do you get it to run on mac?
    Question 2) is this just the way it is? You cannot depend on web applications working at all with mac?
    thanks!
    bob

    Hi Bob,
    Ok, I'll bite
    Apple has to understand that we don't care about who is at fault for web sites not working with Mac
    The WebKit team are more than aware of that fact, and where possible they work with popular websites to get them to correct their websites or add specific 'kludges' into the WebKit code to specifically support these sites.
    Apple has the ability to have an IE mode in safari to handle these situations, but hey choose not to
    I've not heard that before. Can you quote a source?
    If it takes IE compatibility mode to handle all web sites, then just do it.
    That of course costs money. And then there's the prospect of Apple having to license Microsoft's DRM solution to provide 100% compatibility with Windows Media files. As we all know, Apple like good P.R. as much as the next company and handing something like that to Microsoft is never going to happen.
    Microsoft clearly won't provide updated WMP technology for OS X as it gives them nothing, other than the extra impetus for people to switch away from Windows.
    So we're stuck with essentially badgering the broken sites to fix things, or going somewhere else (and spending our $$$ there if needed).
    The bar for a college student is much lower
    True, but today's college student is tomorrow's business person and Apple products are very popular with college students these days. Apple are in this for the long term. Things will change, but we have to live in the real world and know this isn't going to happen soon.
    The truth of the matter is that the sooner Microsoft get on board with being a responsible web-citizen then the better it will be for everyone (and by everyone I don't just mean Apple users, but anyone connected to the internet).
    Almost [1 in 3 browsers on the web are not Internet Explorer|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usageshare_of_webbrowsers] - that's a huge number and businesses on the web need to be aware of this.
    Please please please do not get me wrong - I would love it if Safari (or Firefox, or Opera, or Chrome, or ...) could handle every site that IE does but it's never, ever going to happen.
    Cheers,
    Ben

  • Printing on HP P1505 not printing correctly yet Explorer 9 works on same web site with same printer.

    I have download the latest software for Firefox and the HP P1505 printer, but the pictures within the web site print correctly. The text information is not printing correctly. Lots of spaces and the font is a mess. You can read the text information, but it is all over the page. Firefox did print with no issues before 4.0b12. It always worked with the version 3 of course. I really do not want to go back to 3 as 4 is better except for this issue.

    This is a known issue in Firefox 4 beta 12. You could wait til' the RC comes out, or you could grab one of the latest nightly builds availible here that fix this problem: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central/
    Just a note though, nightly versions of firefox are generally less stable than betas or releases. I am waiting for the Release Candidate to come out myself. (Should be early next week)

  • Firefox does not work with the USPS self ship web site. Will not allow printing of postage labels.

    Some months ago, user "junkbondman" asked this question somewhat poorly, and partly as a result got a non-responsive boilerplate answer by someone who did not read the question's key (if cryptic) point:
    > Select a service type. THIS IS WHERE THE WEB SITE FAILS TO WORK PROPERLY
    That's too bad, because 16 other users identified "HAVE SAME PROBLEM" - as had, no doubt, a large majority of the 677 viewers of the question. However, maybe to get a better answer we need to start with a better definition of the problem.
    The way that the USPS site <cns.usps.com> works to print a label is that addresses (return and forward) are defined, the package weight and value are specified, and then a shipping mode is selected before paying and printing the label. The shipping mode is selected in a section titled "Select a service type", via an embedded table using a vertical scroll-bar that Firefox cannot handle. [Firefox is not alone in that. For example, Safari under iOS cannot scroll the embedded table, but USPS provides a mobile app which mitigates that problem by presenting the table differently.]
    Now, it should be stipulated that the table is the worst element in a bad page that does not begin to pass W3 validation [71 errors, 19 warnings - looks like government work]. However, other browsers (like Google Chrome) handle that table with apparent ease. The question is whether Firefox should be able to do so - and, if so, how? As of Fx 33.0, this still does not work.
    NOTES:
    (1) Unfortunately, to examine this problem requires setting up a USPS account in order to see the shipping page. Setting up the account is easy, but it is a small extra burden to examining the problem.
    (2) The problem has been reported to USPS, but has elicited no sign of intelligent life.

    ''I get the "pointer" mouse cursor when mousing over the blue bar, and I can click on it and scroll the contents as with any other scroll bar, but the bar doesn't move up and down in sync with the content being scrolled: it just stays put. If I do not slide straight down, the blue bar may twitch a pixel left or right.''
    Great description! - sorry if you implied that earlier and I misunderstood, but I think that description adds crucial details:
    * must hover over the ''blue'' part of the bar (representing the visible part of the table) and
    * get the "selector" cursor (the pointing finger), then
    * hold that click while scrolling (inside or outside of the table doesn't matter, as long as that click is held) to the needed table row, then
    * release the click, and the table stays in place to allow a selection.
    Most pages with an embedded scrollable input form (like the box I'm typing in on this page) do not change to the selector cursor when hovering over ''any'' part of the scroll bar, either ''blue'' (representing the visible part of the input form) or ''white'' (the invisible part of the input form). And it is common to click in the ''white'' part of the bar as a way of saying "show what is not visible". You can't do that with these USPS input forms, which behave differently.
    Now, even with this method, that remains a very unintuitive (because the scroll bar does not reflect the position, and because the actual ''selections'' never get the "selector" cursor) and awkward way to work, so there is no visual feedback on either part of the operation.
    And, I must try to understand why some browsers treat this differently. For example with Chrome (like Firefox), the cursor changes to "selector" in the blue part of the scroll bar, but not in the white part, but with Chrome (unlike Firefox):
    - a ''click'' in the white ("invisible") part of the scroll bar or
    - a ''drag'' on the blue ("visible") part of the scroll bar
    causes movement in the required direction - altogether more intuitive behavior.
    Bottom line: At least there is a way to make this work with Firefox, but it is awkward, to say the least. It will require a lot more thought to think about:
    * how and why some browsers handle these non-standard input forms with such intuitive behavior (that is, behavior that is familiar in more standard input forms),
    * whether the fact that Firefox is less accommodating in that regard is a reportable bug, or whether Firefox should not have to worry about sites (like usps.com) that can't be bothered to comply with standards.
    What do you think about those questions?

  • Solaris 10 11/06 - Cannot access external web sites from server

    Hi,
    I am relatively new with Solaris so I hope this is something simple. I just installed Solaris 10 11/06 with the `Secure By Default` option.
    From the command line I can use dig and nslookup to resolve external web sites fine, but if I try to use the update conection manager (desktop), mozilla browser (desktop), or pkg-get (command line) it fails to resolve the external sites. I have a valid resolv.conf file and I have named installed and running.
    It is on a LAN with other servers that have no problems with external access. I am running as root in all instances, so is there some permissions issue I am missing with this install/release?
    I don't want to open up the install more than I have to.
    Thanks,

    Hi again,
    I figured it out. The nsswitch.conf file was not referencing dns as part of the `hosts` and ipnodes` resolution methods. Once I added this and restarted named it worked.
    group: files
    hosts: files dns
    ipnodes: files dns
    networks: files
    -----------------------

Maybe you are looking for