Release Indictor Issue

Hi,
We have 3 release indicators B(Blocked),R(Released) and Z(Ready for Printing same as R)
Now the Problem is after Release upto "Z" we are not able to release collectively i.,e., by Me29n.
Compulsory we have to Use ME28.
But in our new scenario we want to relese collectively.
Any solution.
Please help
Thanks
Prasad

Hi,
Thanks,
We have 5 release codes are there . we want to take the printout in between that means after 3 rd release code.
Hence we have made another release indicator with release for Printing. and it is happening correctly also.
but we are forcing to use me28 after 3rd release.
OK
Prasad

Similar Messages

  • Release Build Issue

    Hello!
    I'm stuck on something pertaining to my release build. It's not working. I know there could be a lot of reasons for this, most related to path dependencies within my code. In my troubleshooting, however, I've stumbled across an issue that I think is at the root of the problem. I'm hoping someone has a solution!
    Here it is:
    I'm using Flex Builder 3, and it's an AS3 project. Running the project is no problem. Works great from the bin-debug folder. As soon as I pull the files in the bin-debug folder into another folder, however, it no longer runs. I'm doing this in the most basic way possible. Here are the steps I'm taking:
    1. create a new folder at the same level as bin-debug. Calling it, creatively, bin-debug2.
    2. copying all the files in bin-debug and pasting them in bin-debug2.
    3. opening my browser and surfing to bin-debug/project.html - works perfect.
    4. opening my browser and surfing to bin-debug2/project.html - doesn't work.
    How is it possible for the exact same files not to work just because the parent folder has a different name?
    I believe answering this will solve my release build issues.
    Thanks!!

    Hi Greg,
    Thank you for taking time to help me troubleshoot this.
    Running the bin-debug version of the projects main .html page in a browser works. Meaning, the page loads, I see the default background color I've set in the compiler, and the opening animation starts.
    Then I copy and paste all of the files in bin-debug to bin-debug2. Try running the exact same .html file. The page opens in the browser and I see the default background color I've set in the compiler. The opening animation never starts.
    Thanks,
    Jake

  • Release Authority Issue

    Hi Experts,
    The senario is as a SOX measure we want to restrict the USER from releasing the PUR Doc. created by himself.
    Means Person who has created document should not be allowed to release the same.
    Is there any workarround.
    Thanks in adv. for the help

    Badi - ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST   Enhancements for Processing Enjoy Purchase Order: Customer
    Check it gets called on release
    Create a message, on Check/Save issue error if Approver = PO Creator.  I'm assuming there is more than one potential approver at the level, otherwise you need to determine a different approver before PO is saved.
    See also Exit
    M06E000  Role determination for release of purchasing documents
    You should be able to get what you want with one of these.
    Regards,
    Nick

  • PR item release workflow issue

    Hi All,
    I have 1 issue with PR item workflow. We have PR itme based workflow with different agents for each line item.
    The issue is when approver goes to execute the work item, all the other items are available to the approver to edit or release other items as well. We want to disable other items being available to the approver for which he is not the approver.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srikar

    Hi Srikar,
       You can do this by using parallel processing in workflows. I am giving you the scenaio we use. We use this in invoices with multiple line items.
    This scenario is implemented using a sub workflow. In the main workflow when you insert a multistep task, go to "Miscellaneous" tab to implement parallel dynamic processing. here you have to pass a multi line container element containing line item numbers. Your sub workflow will trigger one for each entry in multi line element. Do not do any changes to you PR object with in Sub Workflow just get the results of decisions taken by user back to main workflow. Like (App - for approval, Rel - For release, Rej - for rejecetion, etc). When you have all decision collected and returned to main workflow, pass the results in a multi line container element to an activity. Then based on results decide weather you want to release or reject.
    Doing this if one person releases his line item, it will not effect the other workitems which have gone to other approvers.
    We do agent assignment based on profit centers.
    Best of luck.
    Regards
    Anuj Nagpal.

  • Segment Release version issue - ECC6 to older ver.

    Hi
    Our system was recently upgraded from ECC5 to ECC6 and we are facing an issue with one of the interfaces that is connected directly to the R/3 System.
    This issue is realted to an outbound interface and it used to work fine when we were on ECC5. The message we are sending is a bespoke extension based on basic type DELVRY03. The segment E1EDL24 have new fields added to them in the 701 release version compared to the 620 version which was the higest available on ECC5.
    I tried reducing the IDOC segment release version to 620 and 46C in the partner profile, but the message received by the thirdparty still contains the new fields which is causing an issue at their end.
    I would appreciate if you could provide me some guidanace on how to appraoch this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    Praveen

    Hello Guy's,
    We have recenlyt upgraded our quality system to ECC6.
    I am also facing the same issue, As per my unnderstadning if I put segment release in WE20 then in ALE communication Layer Idoc should remove the fileds which are not intended for the given release. For example E1EDP01 is having highest release 008 for 701 release. If I set 40A in partner profile the Idoc should generate with fileds only available in 40A release i.e. version 003,but SAP is filling all thefilds which are available in701 relase.
    I don;t understand why SAP has given such a functionality though it actually not filter the data at communication layer!!.
    Could you please let me know did any of you really see the difference when you use segment release in WE20 when using PI as receiver? I did sevaral test for MATMAS, ORDERS found this segment release is useless.
    If you have applied any workarounds(other then updating receiver system mapping) please let me know. I think is there any modification in ECC6???
    Edited by: Naresh Reddy K on Jun 7, 2010 3:30 PM

  • PR release workflow - issue in mulitple level approval

    Hi Experts,
    I have developed a new workflow for PR release strategy.
    Business object: BUS2105 ( Purchase Requistion )
    Triggerring event: ReleaseStepCreated
    Step1: Workflow started ( Releasestepcreated)
    Step2: Approve PR ( Agent1)
    Step2a
    If yes --> Released to next level (Agent 2 )
    Step2b
    If No --> Rejected and notified initiator
    If Yes --> Notify intiator and exit
    Step3b.
    If no --> based on next release code and release
    group get the next level agent and go to
    step2
    Step4: Workflow ends.
    Issue:
    For single step PR release, workflow is working fine.
    When PR created with multiple level release, a workflow triggers and notifies the 1st level agent, when the agent releases the PR at 1st level and saves it , workflow is not proceeds to further steps to find the next level agent.
    Here i am using the FM to fetch the approvers and assigning the same for release codes.
    Please guide me...

    Hi
    ''workflow is not proceeds to further steps''... do you mean that RELEASESTEPCREATED event is not triggered for next step ?
    you can check this in SWEL that whether event is getting triggered after first release.
    If yes then the issue is in configuration of release strategy where for all release code you need to mark workflow parameter 1.

  • Purchase requisition release strategy issue

    I have created release strategy in development, it was working fine with work flow. When I try to import the TR's I found that the document types in development are not in quality so I changed the document type. then I tried to create a PR and when I clicked on messages its not triggering the release strategy don't know why. In total there are 2 characteristic plant and document type.I even tried to delete the plant characteristic and tried again creating PR but still no use. let me put some screen shots comparing the development and quality. Please do help.

    Thanks for the quick reply, I just checked that the over all indicator for the development and quality, I found that in development its not activated while its activated in quality will that be of any issue.
    In development
    In Quality

  • PO Release Strategy Issue

    HI,
    We have created a PO release strategy workflow.All scenarios are working fine except 1 scenario.
    That is,when a PO is created and rejected by a user in user decision step.The workflow will end.If the PO is changed(amount) again,the release strategy is triggered for the same user.But the workflow is not triggering.
    If the release strategy is for a different user,its triggering the workflow.
    I have used a fork inside which 1 parallel branch contains a wait for significantly changed event & another branch contains the user decision step,po release step & rejection reason scenario.
    Can anyone tell the solution for why the workflow is not triggering for only this scenario?
    Thanks,
    Aparna.

    Feddie wrote:>
    > Kjetil, I am not clear still, could you explain me a bit clear. I have not seen any tool tip in my release tab.
    Don't you see any buttons in the subscreen? The tooltip is not for the tab (title) it is for the button. I am quite sure there is a button there for cancelling the rejection, but without access to a system where this has been set up I can't check it. I just had the same issue before Christmas, where the users said the solution didn't work for the same reason mentioned here - no workflow was sent after changes where made. In fact the solution did work flawlessly as soon as they cancelled the rejection.
    See also [documentation at help.sap.com|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/4c/16443c4a089537e10000000a114084/frameset.htm|ERP release ECC 6.0] for the workflow for rejected purchase orders.

  • Oracle Database 10g 64-bit (10.0.2.5) with Developer 6i release 2 Issue

    Hi,
    I am using oracle database10g (10.0.2.5) 64bit on linux Red Hat 64bit. Problem is on forms having required field as hidden or not taken in-put from user Using developer 6i release 2. Please guide me or give some advice to resolve the issue.
    Basically i want upgrade developer 6i to developer 6i release 2 but when i run some forms on developer 6i release 2 return some error (enter required field ).
    Thanks

    Problem is on forms having required field as hidden or not taken in-put from user 1. Un-hide the field and/or make it enterable so that the user can enter a value.
    or
    2. Make the field optional instead of required.
    or
    3. Give the field a default value.
    or
    4. Give the field a value programmatically.
    Looks like a bug in Developer 6i R1 that this was possible at all.

  • Edge Animate 1.01 is now released, fixing issues with DPS

    Hey All,
    If you've been using Edge Animate content in your DPS creations I come bearing good news! Edge Animate 1.01 is now available for download, providing a fix for a nasty iOS6 bug when deploying multiple Animate compositions in DPS. If you're using EA in conjunction with DPS I encourage you to download the update. Instructions and release notes can be found here http://helpx.adobe.com/edge-animate/release-note/release-notes-edge-an imate.html.
    Thanks to all of our InDesign/DPS friends for using Edge Animate!
    Sarah Hunt
    Product Manager, Adobe Edge Animate

    Hi,
    Thank you for the post.
    Can you please share your composition in which you are getting this issue. We will investigate this issue.
    In the mean time, you can install the previous version of Edge animate using below link.
    HTML animation | Download free Adobe Edge Animate CC trial
    Regards,
    Devendra

  • TFS Build and vNext Release Trigger issue

    When the build definition is set to “True” for release – getting the error even though the Release template was linked to the Build definition.
    ERROR: No release template matching the current build definition was found to create a release and deployment for.
    When flag is reset to false to release - build completes and let the release be created in RM Client and select the latest build.
    Another observation, was able to link the same build definition to both "Agent based" and "vNext" releases at the same time.What could be the wrong we are doing?

    I had exactly the same issue (reported
    here). And have reported this issue in
    Microsoft Connect as well and waiting for their reply 
    Regards, Bharath
    LinkedIn:

  • Airport Extreme 802.11n New Firmware Release (VPN ISSUE)

    The info accompanying the release of today's firmware upgrade makes no mention of a fix to the VPN problems. Does anyone know if the new firmware had any effect on the problem?
    Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   4 GB Ram

    Our VPN is now working (checkpoint)
    For me the firmware update initially seemed to fix the VPN issue, but after closer inspection there still seems to be something wrong with it. (We are using CheckPoint.) My Wintel-box that has been provided by my employee is still having issues with connecting to our exchange server and the network drives do not seem to be working all that realiable. Probably a configuration issue, but do you have any ideas on where to start looking for a solution?
    br,
    -Joose

  • Schedulling agreement release output issue/.........

    Hi All,
    This issue is related to scheduling agreement release. I've mentained condition record for doc type/ purch. org/ vendor through transaction MN10 for this.
    Now i am maitaining Delivery schedule for this, but system is not fetching the output type automatically here. Nor its is allowing me to put it manualluy as the whole field is greyed out.
    Can anybody help in resolving this issue?
    Thanks in advance.

    >
    aakansha kumar wrote:
    > Hi All,
    >
    > This issue is related to scheduling agreement release. I've mentained condition record for doc type/ purch. org/ vendor through transaction MN10 for this.
    >
    > Now i am maitaining Delivery schedule for this, but system is not fetching the output type automatically here. Nor its is allowing me to put it manualluy as the whole field is greyed out.
    >
    > Can anybody help in resolving this issue?
    >
    > Thanks in advance.
    Check if your output type is present in the output type determination in the following path:
    Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Messages -> Output Control -> Message Determination Schemas ->  Define Message Schema for Scheduling Agreement Release/Expediter
    Also check the analysis tab while you check the SA release, it will give you clearer idea about the problem.
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • Production Release Install Issues on Linux

    I just upgraded from the beta to the production relase on Linux (Suse 10.0).
    The following issues were easy enough to bypass, but should be fixed in the next release nevertheless, to allow a Linux installation as smooth as under Windows:
    * calculation of required swap space: when I installed the beta in November I had 512MB RAM and 1GB swap - no problem at all. Meanwhile I upgraded to 1GB RAM, 1GB swap. The production release complained during install. Why would I need more swap to install Oracle after upgrading RAM? Should the script not instead check total memory (RAM+swap) and be happy?
    * second, related issue: the installer complained that I had only 850MB swap space, it supposedly required 1GB. Fact: I have 1GB swap space, but about 150MB were used at that time. Instead of checking the total swap space, the installer checked the free swap space. Solution was easy enough: swapoff -a ; swapon -a. All swap space free, installer runs...
    * during configuration (/etc/init.d/oracle-xe configure) I selected not to automatically start Oracle at boot time. This set the ORACLE_DBENABLED variable (in /etc/sysconfig/oracle-xe) to false. Unfortunately this variable is used in /etc/init.d/oracle-xe to check before 'start' and 'stop'. As a result it was not possible to manually start and stop the database. Solution: either don't check the variable before start and stop or - as I did: set ORACLE_DBENABLED to true and prevent start at boot time by editing the runlevels (as should be).
    Other than that: great product and great timing! Keep up the good work! Thanks a lot!
    Cheers,
    Peter

    As an addendum to the above, I noticed that sqlplus failed wouldn't run - it was failing with messages such as:
    ERROR:
    ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
    ORA-27121: unable to determine size of shared memory segment
    Linux Error: 13: Permission denied
    and:
    ERROR:
    ORA-27140: attach to post/wait facility failed
    Through scanning countless posts on this forum the solution turned out to be:
    chmod u+s `which oracle`
    chmod g+s `which oracle`
    Speaking as someone who is in Oracle's target audience for this product (small company, currently using open source DBs), I have to say that my experience of installing Oracle was pretty painful and was far more hassle than PostgreSQL, MySQL or even (heaven forbid) SQLServer. Come on Oracle, you can do better than this!

  • Captivate patch released - possible issue?

    Hi all
    First, a wonderful announcement! The Adobe folks have released a patch for Captivate 4. So thanks for all the problem reports.
    Click here to read about it
    Now for some possibly disturbing news. My own Captivate 4 is today reporting licensing has expired. If you see the same, Please report the bug!
    Click here to visit the Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Cheers... Rick
    Click here for Adobe Certified Captivate and RoboHelp HTML Training
    Click here for the SorcerStone Blog
    Click here for RoboHelp and Captivate eBooks

    Hi Rick,
    I didn't notice any issues yet but I am actually able to record audio and record screen interactions now on my Vista 64-bit system.. The screen recordings are still a little buggy since it wont actually create the captions like it would do on a 32-bit system, but I'll try and reinstall Captivate and see if that helps out.
    /Michael
    Click here to visit the www.captivate4.com blog

Maybe you are looking for

  • Audio Tracks will not play

    Hi there, I'm using FCP 7 for a project that was originally edited in Final Cut 6 (I had to switch to 7 because BOTH my computers at home have crashed today which use FCP6, now I'm up at my office and have to use 7 - bad day, I know). I'm trying to d

  • How do I restore my iTunes library from a backup?

    Like an idiot I deleted my Itunes library after backing it up to an external HD. After doing this I deleted my original iTunes library and lo and behold I had no music. I thought I would be able to play them from the external HD but this wasn't the c

  • Weirdness with creating QT files

    I have nine short HD clips I'm making into QT files with Photo JPeg codec from FCP timeline. All shot with same camera, captured in same way, same time, and have all been treated same way in the edit. When I convert them to QT, some of them turn out

  • HAVING A HARD TIME WITH SPRY MENU BAR - #2

    To V1: Thanks for the answer - it took care of the problem. After I changed the links in the site to absolute,  another problem occurred: the links only function  on the uploaded site, not in DW (when I click on "preview in browser" in DW, the link i

  • Serious problem with my MB....

    A few minutes ago, I downloaded a program to convert a movie to an iPod Touch. After starting the conversion, it said it was going to take several hours. Shortly thereafter, the fan kicked up to 6500 rpm and I decided to "bail". With no apparent prog