Release Invoice Price Block and Quantity Block

Hi,
How can I release the Invoice Price and Quantity block at the same time? I need to create a Step in a work flow to release all blocks of a two-way match block invoice.
I've already tried to have a BDC for transaction MRBR but it is not working.
Can anyone help?

Hi Simi,
This type of behaviour is documented in SAP note 394370:
"A document generated with MIRO was blocked for payment.You cancel the
payment block from the vendor line item in the FI follow-up
document.Transaction MRBR then displays the invoice document
nevertheless. Why?
The invoice document itself cannot be changed by changes to the
follow-up documents; this is not programmed.Transaction MRBR therefore
continues to display the document as blocked. If this document is
released from an MM point of view, the FI follow-up document remains
released.Thus the damage caused is restricted to unnecessary work by the
user.
SAP recommends that you only use the release transactions for releasing
invoices."
MRBR generates its list of blocked invoices from table RBKP_BLOCKED and is the
only transaction which deletes entries from this table thats why when your report
calls FB02 to remove the payent block MRBR will still show the invoice as blocked.
You could code in a pop up message in your report that prevents the user from
deleting the payment block and to advise using MRBR instead to delete the block.
Hope this helps,
Adam.

Similar Messages

Reg Price block and Qty block in MM Invoice docs Tolerence Keys adjustment

Hi Friends,
Related to MM Invoice documents gets blocked with Price block and Qty block,based on this FI doc also gets blocked with Payment block indicator"R".As per Std SAP we can remove these blocks thru MRBR. Right now my users are asking not required to remove these blocks with MRBR Tcode.
So i checked the Tolerence Limits defined for the co code and Tolerence keys.
As per my understanding Tolerence Keys "PP-Price variance", "DQ-Exceed amount: quantity variance" need to adjust with upper llimits and Lower Limits.
here i can see Upper and Lower check limit Tolerance limit 5.00% for Tolerence Key "PP-Price variance"
Tolerence limit 0.01% for Tolerence key "DQ-Exceed amount: quantity :quantity variance
Instead of changing the Tolerence Limits can i select the DO NOT CHECK Radio button for the bothe Price and Qty block.
If i selected the DO NOT check button what will happen,how it works.
How i can maintain the Tolerence keys,is there any other Tolerence keys also need to maintain.
Please suggest me with your valuable inputs.
Brgds,
RK
Edited by: RK.SAP on Nov 17, 2010 7:02 AM

hi,
If you do not want to check the Invoice for tolerance keys like quantity variance and price varaince then tick on don't check .In this case system will not block any invoice and invoice will post Automatically without any error.
Please check other tolerance keys in SPRO: OMR6
One more blocking is defined in the vendor master also under payment transactions accounting screen.There you are defining the tolerance group for Invoice Verification.
Regards,
Amit

Blocking and non-blocking workflows

How to specify a workflow to be blocking and non-blocking?
Regards,
Miguel

When registering the custom workflow from Application Server Control (Enterprise Manager Web Site), you will see an option to specify whether the workflow is blocking:
Application Server Control > Content > Custom Workflows
Register Workflow
* Name
Description
* Launch Event
* Cancel Event
Blocking
Approvers Required

Set Posting block and Purchasing block automatically upon vendor creation

Hi.
I have a requirement to automatically set the purchasing block and posting block to 'X' upon creation of vendor master. I have seen a user exit to do this but then I can't seem to find a way to set the SPERM field to 'X'.
Please help. THanks.

Transaction FIBF start the event manager.
on menu: environment->info system (P/S) and then execute: it will be displayed all possible events.
between event 1410 and 1460, you will find all events about vendor.
click on documentation, it will tell you when the event is reached and what you can do.
After you have choose an event, you must create a function module, copying it from the sample function module of the event.
Once you have created your own funcion module, you should go to:
FIBF->SETTINGS->P/S MODULES.
This part of customization is not very clear to me, i've never done by myself. Anyway, here you associate at the businness event the function module you have created.
Sorry for not beeing exaustive, hope anyway could be help you.
Regards
Andrea

Both blocking and non-blocking io

I'm wondering if this scenario is possible with the new nio classes:
I have a caching server. Clients connect to the server and occasionally send requests for objects. I'd like to use the nio non-blocking APIs to detect that there is a read pending on a socket. However, once I detect this, I'd like to go into a blocking loop to process the request. After this done, I'd like to go back into non-blocking mode and wait for another request.
It seems like this should be possible but the (woefully lacking) documentation isn't clear. Neither is the source code, apparently.
I've got a test case working but I was hoping someone could validate for me that this is support behavior. It's done by waiting for the isReadable() key then calling socket.keyFor(selector).cancel(); and then socket.configureBlocking(true); The reads are then done in blocking mode until the request is done and then the socket is registered with the selector again.
Thanks for any help on this.

I have to ask why you would want to mix blocking and non-blocking I/O.
The only reason you would (IMHO) want to use non-blocking I/O is in a highly concurrent system, to increase the maximum load a system can handle.
The main reason you would want to use blocking I/O rather than non-blocking I/O would be to minimise the latency for a single request.
Unfortunately, the two don't seem to mix together very well... by switching a thread to blocking, you decrease the latency for a single request, but increase latency for the other requests due to reduced resources available. Similarly, by switching to blocking, you are requiring a dedicated thread for that request, so limiting the number of concurrent requests that can be serviced.
That is, it seems to me that using both blocking and non-blocking I/O introduces the weaknesses of both into the system, without gaining much of the benefits of either.
The above aside, the method you gave looks like it would work as you expect, depending on what you are doing with thread creation/delegation. Did your test case work as expected?

Purchase order price variance and quantity variance

Hi All ,
     I am working on a report development where we need price change , value change and quantity change in the report along with net value (ekpo-netwr) .
    Can anybody suggest me tables in ECC where the changes (price,quantity and total value ) are captured ??? and if there is any BI content datasource which can satisfy this requirement.

Hi All ,
     I am working on a report development where we need price change , value change and quantity change in purchase order in the report along with net value (ekpo-netwr)
    Can anybody suggest me tables in ECC where the changes (price,quantity and total value ) are captured ??? and if there is any BI content datasource which can satisfy this requirement.

Problem in Execute query on non-database block and database block together

Hi All,
In my form,i have
1. First block is Non-database block with one non-database item.
2. Second and third blocks are database blocks.
Now the problem is that i want to perform execute-query for all the blocks.
If the cursor is on the non-database item of 1st block and i clicks on the "Enter-query" then i am getting message " This function can not be performed here".
If i click on the item of the database block and then clicks on the "Enter-query" and then "execute-query" it's working fine.
But i don't want to do in this way.
My cursor will be on the First block only and then it should perform execute-query.
I am using this non-database item to copy value of this item to the item of the database block item.
I think i make you understand about my problem.
I am using forms 10g on Window xp.
Please help me.

Hi!
Simply create a enter-query trigger on the non-database-block:
begin
go_block ( 'database_block' );
enter_query;
end;If your search criteria is in the non-database-item in the first block,
you actually do not need the enter_query build-in.
Just create a execute-query trigger on the first block like:
begin
go_block ( 'database_block' );
execute_query;
go_item ( :System.trigger_item );
end;And in a pre-query trigger on the database-block copy the
value of your seach item into the item you want to search for.
Regards

Page up and page down to go to next block and previous block

hii all
I want to incorporate a functionality which when the user clicks the page up button the cursor should navigate to the previous block and if i press the page down button the cursor should navigate to the next block
are there any triggersto do this ??
plzz help
thanks
mandar

hii
thanks for ur response
i have written the code told my james
i have two blokcs master and details
i press the page down key to navigate to the details block from the master block..
after writing the code and executng the form when i press page down key
the message appears that at last block but the cursor still remains in that block only how do i make the cursor to next block ??
plzz help
mandar

Max-width Ignored on fo:block and fo:block-container

I am writing an XSLT template using XSL-FO and I have an fo:block for which I want to limit the width. I set the property max-width to "3in" on the block, and that did nothing. Then I put the block into an fo:block-container and set the max-width property of it to "3in", and this was also ignored.
Is this a bug in the rendering engine or am I doing something wrong?
The block is in an fo:static-content.
Thanks,
Kurz

I'm not exactly sure I get what you intention is, but here are a few things to consider maybe.
max width will not make the image expand, just keep it from being any wider than the max width.
images by default display as in line. To make a width property work reliably, you will need to set it to block:
div#secondaries ol.secondary li div.item-img img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
image width as set above will be affected by its containers. (If you meant to limit the width of the image rather than to resize it, the same thing should still be true of a max-width on the image, though cross-browser support will be unreliable.)
The relevant container for the case above is:
div#secondaries ol.secondary li {
font-size: 1.1em;
width: 30%;
margin-top: 0em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;
margin-left: 0em;
So do you really mean it to be 30% or did you mean 100%.

Co-relation between oracle blocks and OS blocks ??

how is the database data-block co-related withe the OS data-block ??

Akshay, 
 
Ca va, merci. ;-) 
In the doc above, we can read "Each operating system has a block size. Oracle requests data in multiples of Oracle data blocks, not operating system blocks.". 
 
Anyway, you can search into Oracle doc, and find DB_BLOCK_SIZE Initialization Parameter : If a database's block size is different from the operating system block size, make the database block size a multiple of the operating system's block size. 
 
Nicolas.

User exit/BADI in MIRO that would trigger invoice quantity block.

Hi,
Is there a way to enchance MIRO so that an invoice quantity block will be set automatically through user exit/BADI?
My requirement is that if an invoice is to be posted onto a PO line using an IO, the invoice needs to be processed onto the PO line up to the total of the PO line. And if the invoice goes above the PO line and there is still some budget on the IO, the invoice should get a quantity block.
Also, the quantity block should be set before posting the invoice.
Thanks.

Hi,
Exit Name           Description
LMR1M001            User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002            Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003            Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004            Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
LMR1M005            Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
LMR1M006            Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001            Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002            Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003            Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001            Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
Badi Name            Description
INVOICE_UPDATE       Business Add-In: Logistics Invoice Verification
INVOICE_UPDATE       Transfer Invoice Receipt to Records Management
INVOICE_UPDATE       Event manager communication from invoice processing
INVOICE_UPDATE       Rückantwort ins CRM aus der Lieferantenrechnung
INVOICE_UPDATE       Implementierung, um S1NVEXC zu übermitteln
INVOICE_UPDATE       Save FI Document Type for Principle of Prudence
INVOICE_UPDATE       Vendor Evaluation Based on Documents from IV
Check this badi's and user exits.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Qamar.

Invoice --- quantity block

Hi Gurus,
I created a Po in which GR based IV indicator unchecked(in item detail --invoice tab). Then done Invoice without doing GR...
Now the invoice status is showing as quantity block
wat could be the reason...
regards,
subbu

Hi,
I am having the same problem.But even after releasing the invoice without doing GR also the invoice showing in the Quantity blocked status as "X". Can any one help what could be the reason for this.
regards,
Kannan B

Quantity block

Hi Gurus,
I created a Po in which GR based IV indicator unchecked(in item detail --invoice tab). Then done Invoice without doing GR.invoice status is showing as quantity block..But even after releasing the invoice without doing GR also the invoice showing in the Quantity blocked status as "X".
Can any one help what could be the reason for this.
regards,
Kannan B

Hi
SAP help says about Quantity Variance as, "The invoiced quantity is larger than the difference between the quantity delivered and that already invoiced". Here, there is no Delivered Qty as you didn't do GR. Therefore, the difference will always be there. That's why it is blocking the Invoice.

Sale order delivery and billing blocked

Hi sap sd gurus
I have a problem after creating a sale order , the one line item in sale order showing status of delivery blocked and billing blocked , now i am unable to post delivery and billing when i see in schedule line item order qty and confirmed qty .
Now i want to find why this is blocked and remedy for removing this block .
Could anyone suggest me in this issue asap
thanks in advance
Kanna

Dear Kanna,
Go to XD02 at the toppage you will find Extras
In that Extra Topage you will find a field Blocking Data.
Check whether Order block and Delivery Block has been ticked.
If ticked is there remove the tick and try Delivery and Billing.
If you have any concerns revert back the same to me
With Regards,
Amjath

Price and quantity variance

Hi guru's,
Can any body explain how to find out price variance and quantity variance?thanx in advance

hi,
for price varience we need to assign gl account for transaction event key prd in obyc settings
Thanks & Regards
phaneendra

Release Invoice Price Block and Quantity Block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for