Release Rules Problem

Hi All,
While Settin Up the OM,there existing a problem in Release Rules:-
in tab Inventory in (Define Release rules form) when i go to select the warehouse ,i can not find any organizations defined . it appears empty.
thanks.

are you on 11.5.9 or 11.5.10? This issue has been reported in 11.5.9 but I belived it is resolved in 11.5.10. Please check patch 4688704 for more details.
thanks
Vikrant

Similar Messages

Facing problem in define Release Rule

I have completely defined all the things in OM, but when i am going to define the Release rule,in the warehouse...the LOV is blank... as far as the Inv. Org are concerned... i am finding it on every screen...but in this partcular screen ... it`s not shwoing any warehouse... when i am going to define release rule...i have already made the ship confirm rules, the Picking rules...So, please help me this regard..
Thanks.

I can see my inventory organization everywhere in the OM, i have defined everything regarding warehouses.... but i only left the customer and supplier association ...when i am enetering the inventory oraganizatin`s ...recieving information,inventory info and accounting info. in global HRMS.right now when i am going to define release rules....in the inventory tab... my warehouse list is not coming there only...Thanks
Junaid

How to use Pick Release Rule while doing pick relase from API.

Hi All,
I need to Pick Release the Order based on pick release rule through and API. I am using WSH_DELIVERY_PUB to do Pick release/confirm.
I did not find any parameter in the API which allows to use Picking rules for Pick Release.
Is there any way we can do the PICK RELEASE using Picking Rule through APIs.
Any information on this will be appreciated.
Thanks
Sreenivasa Gurani.

Hi Srini,
You need to use WSH_PICK_LIST.RELEASE_BATCH API, this one has two parameters
1. p_batch_id -- Get it from WSH_DELIVERY_DETAILS tables
2. p_log_level -- Not requires
Or
By Using this API you create the Batch
WSH_PICKING_BATCHES_PUB.CREATE_BATCH -- This API Returns Batch id
use this batch_id for WSH_PICK_LIST.RELEASE_BATCH
Thanks
Reddy

Release Rule Form

I am defining Release rule form, defined all the parameters but Ship From, Warehouse list is not coming, giving error message as "FRM-41830: List of ValueContains no entries".
I have defined Transaction types, warehouse is coming in LOV but not appearing in Release Rule Form (Order management->Setup->Picking->Defined release rules form)
I have done all setups correctly, please advise.

949067 wrote:
I am defining Release rule form, defined all the parameters but Ship From, Warehouse list is not coming, giving error message as "FRM-41830: List of ValueContains no entries".
I have defined Transaction types, warehouse is coming in LOV but not appearing in Release Rule Form (Order management->Setup->Picking->Defined release rules form)
I have done all setups correctly, please advise.what happens if you go to inventory tab and in that warehouse..?are you able to see there?
I guess ship from is the actual location of the warehouse
Mahendra

Release Rules in 11.0.3

When setting up a release rule the LOV for customers is created by all customer that has open orders. Once that customer does not have an open order, you can not pull up the release rule. We have auto picking through concurrent managers, is this standard. Will the release rule kick back in again when there is an open order?
Thanks, Beth

Set hold until date to the order lines and run the auto release concurrent program.
Thanks / Bhaskar Akkala

Update rule problem - validation of "sales/cost w/ tax" keyfigure

BW Gurus,
    Hi to all, i have this update rule problem at "sales/cost w/tax" keyfigure here is the senario.
    Our Goverment mandatory implemented an additional 2% tax from the original 10%, this will affect our report on sales, and also the BW "sales/cost w/ tax" key figure.
    My question is How can I validated the effectivity of the new tax? i have tax 10% from previous sales and 12% on the current sales. What "date field" can I use to validated this. I am using /BIC/CS2LIS_13_VDITM stucture to get the data i need.
Thanks in Advance
Joven

Hi,
Till to day how are extracting the data for tax(original 10%) is it available directly in 2LIS_13_VDITM ?
Usually all taxes( condition types) can be extracted by the data source 2LIS_13_VDKON.Discuss with SD team, they may give the condition type used for different taxes.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar sharma .P

Can Pick Release Rule be restricted to Operating Unit

Hi Gurus,
I have created Pick Release Rule for two operating unit. Though operating units are different , I am able to see Pick Release rule in both Responsibilities.
Also all inventory organisations created are appearing in LOV of Warehouse field of pick release rule.
Can anyone please suggest if I can achieve this without customization?
Edited by: user11981009 on Nov 11, 2012 4:14 AM

Hi,
you can achieve this through form personalisation.
Regards,
Rajesh

Alternate subinventory for pick-Release rule

Hi everybody, this is my first post and I have a question.
I have configured a subinventory for our top 4 clients and a pick-release rule for them (the rule refers to the subinventory to pick the items from) but im wondering if there is a way to define an alternate subinventory in case the primary doesn't have enough items in any given time, or any workaround for that matter.
Thanks!
Oracle applications 11.5i

Thanks Vipin,
We have not WMS, therefore those special rules are out of my reach, altough the min-max can be helpfull. I had an Idea yersterday, but it seems more like a temporary workaround..
The only thing that is not covered in de min-max subinventory rule is that, we supply that special subinventory with items that those customers regularly request, but they can request things they hadn't before, and thats why I needed de rule to look for the unexpected and unavailable items in the main subinventory when needed.
Anyway, is there a simple way to setu up those min-max transferring rules? can you point me in the right direction?
Thanks again!

Mail rules problem

Hi everyone
I'm using a MacBook Pro 10.7.4, I'm having rules problems in Mail.
I run a Graphic design and photography company, I have folders set up for 20-30 clients, when emails come in from a certain client they go straight to that client folder.
Equally, I have a 'Personal' folder, emails from friends should go to there.
Recently though for some reason ALL of my sent items have started to flood into a client folder, a lot of my client emails are going to a general folder and personal emails are not going to the right folders.
Does anyone have a second to advise what might be causing this, or even better - a potential fix for this problem, it's making me a little crazy and adding to my workload daily.
Hope to hear from you.
best regards
Alex

hello. When you say the sent items flood a client folder, do you mean, duplicates, or the actual sent mail goes there?
I have been trying to look into why periodically, things I send go into drafts folder.
Sounds like an issue that needs updating.. maybe we should "report bug to apple" maybe..

WMS Define Release Rules (Need to migrate all the rule)

Hi All,
Is there an API to Migrate all the WMS Release Rules?
Thanks,

Hi All,
Is there an API to Migrate all the WMS Release Rules?
Thanks,

Custom Rule - Problem in passin values From Rule Container to WF Container?

Hi Guys,
I am having hard time passing values back from my custom rule. I have created a custom rule to determine the agents in PFAC which takes in the Person number as import element of container. It determines the Manager as agent and I am passing Managers Person Number back to workflow. If he dont approve the Request then it will be passed to his boss. In this case I will pass this imported Mangers Person number back to rule so that his boss will be determined as agent. I have created ZRULE function module. I am passing value back from Rule container to Workflow Container using following code.
swc_set_element ac_container 'SUPERPERNR' lf_super_pernr.
I have created a element SUPERPERNR on rule container and workflow container as well .The problem is in the Rule container I am not able to create SUPERPERNR as export parameter. The tick mark is grayed out and there is no option for setting it as export.
My question is do I have create a Export element on Rule container or Not? If i just write the code
( swc_set_element ac_container 'SUPERPERNR' lf_super_pernr ) will it set the value in WF container? In my case it is not setting. I have to bind the values from rule container to WF container and if My rule container element is not allowing me to click the tick mark as export how can i pass value of of rule container back to WF Container?
Please help me guys.
Thanks,
Manish.

Hi Manish,
     Same scenario I have developed in my system. This all steps I did in my system.
1) Created a Z function module which takes import parameter (Parameter name = 'EMP') in the
    format 'US100123'.
2) This in turn fetches back the supevisor or boss as an export parameter (Parameter name = 'BOSS') in
     the format 'US100245'.
3) This function module is attached to a BUS object(SWO1).
4) While attaching this function module to BUS object you need not do any manual coding it is done
    automatically.
5) Implement, release and generate this BUS object.
6) Create a new variable in your workflow (Parameter name = 'ZSUPERVISOR') for storing the value
    which is returned by the Z method.
7) Create a new task.
8) Put in your BUS object name, then your Z method name, select background processing checkbox.
9) Press save, it will ask for transfer of missing elements, select yes.
10) Then you will see a green button below your Z method name click on it.
11) Top portion contains your Z method variables, below to it you have the import parameter window in
      this window you should have &EMP& -> &EMP&., below to import parameter window you have
      export parameter window in this window you should have &BOSS& <- &BOSS&. (This is method
      binding).
12) Now click on enter button then click on back button it will generate the task binding automatically
     just press yes.
13) Now click on binding exist button.
14) Here you have the Workflow container variables as well as the system container variables.
15) In the import parameter window left portion is for your workflow variables and right portion is for your
      method variables. In my case i had sent workflow initiator and fetched his supervisor. The Import
      parameter binding was &WF_INTIATOR& -> &EMP&. and the export parameter binding part was
      &ZSUPERVISOR& <- &BOSS&.
16) Save the task and run the workflow.
Regards.
Vaibhav Patil.

Other Delete Business Rule Problem

Hello everybody
I have a problem with Oher delete business rules and the problem is for getting rowid for a deleted row and it causes ther error : no data found.
I solved this problem in this way
qms_transaction_mgt.process_rule_violation
( p_br_name => 'BR_TEAM004_DEL'
, p_msg_code => 'MS-00184'
, p_display_label => display_label
, p_table_name => 'ms_teams'
, p_table_rowid => null /* get_rowid */
In fact, I use null instead of get_rowid for this kind of rull. Is it a good way? Have every body any better way?
Thanks
Hassan

Hassan,
This is a known bug in the original Headstart 6i release. This bug was corrected in Headstart Patch 6.5.2.1 which is available via the Headstart Supplement Option. The Supplement Option can be purchase via your local consulting organization or the Oracle store. You will be given access to a portal from which you can download patches.
Regards,
Lauri

Tiggger-Business Rule Problem

Hi Guys
I have BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON ASSESSMENTS for each row which is doing some sort of validation for date.
IF INSERTING OR UPDATING then
v_involv_identifier := NVL(:new.identifier,:old.identifier);
IF :new.start_date is not null THEN
BEGIN
SELECT MIN(irole.start_date)
INTO v_irole_start
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF trunc(:new.start_date) > trunc(v_irole_start)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
END;
END IF;
IF :new.end_date is not null
THEN
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(irole.end_date)
INTO v_irole_end
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF v_irole_end is not null
AND trunc(v_irole_end) > trunc(:new.end_date)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
End;
BEGIN
SELECT MAX(irole.start_date)
INTO v_irole_start
FROM involvement_roles irole
WHERE irole.involv_identifier = v_involv_identifier;
IF v_irole_start is not null
AND v_irole_start > :new.end_date
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
EXCEPTION
when no_data_found then
null;
END;
END IF;
END IF;
          Now in AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON ASSESSMENTS for each row
          I am updating the values of Involvement_role(irole.start_date, irole.end_date) and
          Involments(start_date, end_date ) to temporary table and from there to respective table to avoid
          mutation.It works fine as expected in all cases.
          But I am unable to update when both InvolvementRole enddate and Invovement enddate are updated at same
          (Both are same date)or InvolvementRole startdate and Invovement startdate are updated at same time
          (Both are same date) because of business rule implemented.But from user prspect it should be able to
          update at the same time.
          After analysising I think it happening because of the max value of v_irole_end & v_irole_start which i m
          getting using the select statement which still coantain the old value.
          Say for example currenlty the InvolvementRole enddate=4/9/2009 and Invovement enddate=4/9/2009
          Now I m updating with value say InvolvementRole enddate=3/9/2009 and Invovement enddate=3/9/2009
          Now with select stm. the max value of v_irole_end=4/9/20099 (say)
          so this rule apply
          IF v_irole_end is not null
AND trunc(v_irole_end) > trunc(:new.end_date)
THEN
raise_application_error(-20103, 'SSL-13085');
END IF;
          and it will not allow to update .
but if you update separately it will not cause any problem as the value of InvolvementRole enddate is
          already modifes and contain the new value (3/9/2009)
          Now question is it's frustrating to user.Can any one suggest how to over and allow user to update
          simulteneouly without violating B-Rules.
          For information I m updating the Involvement Role table before and then InvolvementTable.

1. db details
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
2.
for dml u can look into which updating ----
FOR c IN c_temp_id LOOP
IF c.action_ind = 'R' THEN
dbms_output.put_line('updating role for involvement '||c.identifier||
' to end on '||c.date_param1);
UPDATE involvement_roles
SET end_date = c.date_param1
WHERE involv_identifier = c.identifier;
-- AND end_date IS NULL;
end if ;
IF c.action_ind = 'Q' THEN
update INVOLVEMENTS
set end_date=c.date_param1
WHERE identifier = c.identifier;
End if;
END LOOP;
3. In after statement trigger
procedure is a called to update both table
IF UPDATING THEN
v_db_mode := 'U';
END IF;
involv_asprc(v_db_mode);
code inside procedure involv_asprc look like-----------------------
CURSOR v_del_record IS
select identifier involv_identifier
,action_ind
,text_param1 corgan_code
,text_param2 corgan_mapping_code
,numb_param1 person_identifier
,numb_param2 ounit_identifier_inv
from temporary_identifiers
where session_identifier = v_session
and target_tablename = 'INVOLV_EDIN'
and action_ind = 'D';
v_corgan_code VARCHAR2(4);
ounit_id VARCHAR2(30);
v_count NUMBER;
v_id NUMBER(10);
v_max_date DATE;
v_end_date DATE;
v_per_record NUMBER;
v_excep_desc VARCHAR2(1000);
v_name1 VARCHAR2(10);
v_person_id NUMBER(10);
--End JG167184
BEGIN
--Rc
FOR c IN c_temp_id LOOP
IF c.action_ind = 'R' THEN
dbms_output.put_line('updating role for involvement '||c.identifier||
' to end on '||c.date_param1);
UPDATE involvement_roles
SET end_date = c.date_param1
WHERE involv_identifier = c.identifier;
-- AND end_date IS NULL;
end if ;
IF c.action_ind = 'Q' THEN
update INVOLVEMENTS
set end_date=c.date_param1
WHERE identifier = c.identifier;
End if;
END LOOP;
end;

Association Rules problem

Hello,
I have a problem with making association rules in Oracle 10g ODM. The problem is as follows:
I have my test dataset for testing assoc. rules. I used that dataset before for testing assoc. rules models with Oracle 9i ODM release (9.2.0.4). And I have found significant number of rules within that dataset when I used Oracle 9i ODM (9.2.0.4.).
But when I use Oracle 10g ODM to build an association rules model with the same set of parameters (min. support, min. confidence and max. rule length) I've got 0 rules.
I can't find where is the problem, so I think that there is some sort of bug within Oracle 10g ODM.
Does anyone have similar experience or have some explanation for this?
Thnx in advance,
Ivan

What version of Data Miner are you using?
If you are using the api directly, are you using the
java or pl/sql api.
Thanks, MarkI've been using Java API.
I've continued my investigation of the mentioned problem and I have found that DMS throws following exception:
ORA-38605: FI not enough memory (stringK) for candidate generation(stringK)
Cause: There was insufficient available memory for candidate generation.
Suggested action from Metalink is:
In workarea_size_policy='manual' mode, set ficarea_size to a reasonably larger value. Or, in workarea_size_policy='auto' mode, set pga_aggregate_target to a reasonably larger value
And I've increased the size of my SGA more than three times (from 128 to 512 MB), set work_area_policy=auto and set pga_aggregate_target to 20% of SGA .
After that I've got following exception:
ORA-40101: Data Mining System Error ODM_ASSOCIATION_MODEL-BUILD--20010
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 105
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 150
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 1299
ORA-01452: cannot CREATE UNIQUE INDEX; duplicate keys found
ORA-06512: at "DMSYS.ODM_ASSOCIATION_RULE_MODEL", line 1364
ORA-06512: at line 1
DMS throws this exception after longer time of task execution.
Now, I don't know what to do further.
I repeat that with the same dataset and same model parameters (support, confidence and max. rule length) I've got significant number of rules with ODMS within Oracle 9i database (9.2.0.4).
Thnx,
Ivo

On (release) action problem - how to fix the loading issue?

Hi,
I'm making a progress with the website in Flash. I have pretty much things already done. Motion tweens that change alpha in percentage ammount are working correctly - I've used them for loading pages but I encountered a one tiny problem...
Describing the website: there are buttons that - when you click - play an animation (motion tween with alpha changing) to load a proper page that is pinned with a particular button. So: home button loads the home page, bio button loads the bio page etc. All pages go with the motion tween - they fade in the website (from alpha 0% to 100%). Everything is fine and the website with everything works just perfect! But: there's one thing that doesn't keep me calm. When I open my website in a browser to test it and I click on each button to load pages - everything is ok, but when I want to click the same button few times - other things are being loaded by clicking the same button.
For instance: I click the "bio" button once and it loads my biography page with the motion tween as I described before. But when I want to click it secondly or thirdly it doesn't load my biography page anymore but a page before that one (in this case: home page). When I click it again the button loads my bio page again. So - in sum - it doesn't load the same page all the time, but randomly: the proper one or the one before (in the timeline).
My AC code for each button is simple, for example:
on (release) {
gotoAndPlay(173);
Also I've got the "actions" layer that carries stop(); command in places that are for it.
I tried with _root.gotoAndPlay and also with frame_number +1 and always the same problem.
I hope it isn't anything serrious and can be fixed.
I'll be very grateful for help.
Greets!
J.J.

As I explained in my post: I test my website in the browser (firefox), I click on a particular button which loads a particular section. It works with all buttons but sometimes when I click the button an incorrect section appears.
For example: I click biography button, and the biography section appears. Then I click contact button and contact section appears. Then when I want to see biography section again and click on the biography button, the biography section doesn't appear but the other section appears, for instance: home section, about section, gallery section or other from what I have.
Concluding from the entire description I've placed above in the topic I don't know why this thing happens and I need some help how to fix this issue of loading sections firstly correct and then, after some clicking - incorrect.
I hope I really presented it clearly.

Release Rules Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for