Release strategy -multiple account assignment

Hi,
I have PO release strategy based on account assignment(one of the criteria). AAC used is P,Q, and N . Couple of questions -
1) I do not want to allow multiple account assignment in PO.
2) KNTTP is not available in CEKKO communication structure. I had to bring it through a user exit. Because of this looks like multiple account assignment still triggers release.

Hi
The thing you need to get considered is does the PO release at header level or at item level .You can create a class for account assignment category and assign the charecterestic properly created with the tab basic data properly filled for value assignment and assign the values for the AAC .
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Requisition Release Strategy - multiple account assignments

    Hello,
    We would like to be able to create a purchase requisition where each line item can have 1of 3 account assignments (KNTTP).  These 3 account assignments all have the same Release Strategy.  Our expectation was that the purchase requisition would have a release strategy but it doesn't.  If we use 1 account assignment withmultiple line items we get a Release Strategy but if we mix them we get nothing.
    Does anyone know how to make the Release Strategy show up for multiple account assignments that share the same Release Strategy?
    Regards,
    Corinne Taylor

    Dear Corinne Taylor,
    You may assign a BLANK value in the characteristic:
    You can add also as " " and named it as BLANK so you can have your release strategy get trigger
    for all MRP account assignment or multiple account assignment.
    Example setup
    Account assignment A
    Account assignment K
    Release group X1 strategy 01 classfication has blank in values.
    Classification:
    Value Description
    A         Account assignment A
    K        Account assignment K
               BLANK
    Test this and it will work.
    Best Regards,
    Ian Wong

  • PR Release Strategy for Account assignment cat "U"

    Is it possible to set up release strategy for Acct assignment Cat "U" - if yes, How would it be configured?  additionally we are also setting up Rel str for acct assign cat K and A - specific question is relative to "U" in addition to K and A.
    Other parameters being used are
    pur Org
    Doc type
    cost center
    Total value
    Thanks for the help in advance
    Raj

    Dear Raj,
    When you creating PR with acct assignment U, the acct. assignment tab will not appear, thus
    you not able to enter cost center. You may try this workaround via customizing.
    a) You may define a <BLANK> value for the cost center in customizing and assign it to your release strategy.
    Characteristic:
    Cost Center:
    Value    Desc:
    1000     1000
    2000      2000
                    <BLANK>
    b) You may use user exit  EXIT_SAPLEBND_001 and pass the dummy cost center to get the release strategy
    determine.
    Regards,
    ian Wong Loke Foong

  • Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

    I  am getting error message
    PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
        Message no. MEPO841
    When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
    Sequence of events.
    PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
    Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
    GR done
    PO line item marked for deletion.
    Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
    Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
      (even with check zero indicator )

    Hello Dan ,
    Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
    If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
    If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment )  in Release 604.
    Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment  and test the problem again in a productive system.
    I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Frank Farinella

  • GR/IR Rounding Logic for Multiple Account Assignment

    We have activated business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 (EHP4 release 604), GR valuated. When choosing Distribution on quantity basis and distribute partial inv proportionally, the MIGO postings are different from the MIRO postings. For example, we have a quantity of 12 that we allocate to two different cost centers 33.3 / 66.7 %. We receive a partial qty of 5. MIGO distributes the quantity 1.665 / 3.335, respectively. However, MIRO distributes the quantity 1.666 / 3.333 respectively. Since MIRO is supposed to accept the MIGO quantities and amounts, why is the percentage allocation different?  Is there a way to make the percentages equal for MIGO / MIRO? Modification of the percentage field (VPROZ) in the PO to more than 1 decimal is not an option.
    Example
        PO (quantity-based distribution, partial inv is proportional: Receive partial Qty 5 of total 12
                             Net Value            Qty              Percen           MIGO           MIRO
        Item:            9,600.00 USD    12.000 pc     100.00       4,340.00      4,340.00
        Account 1:  3,200.00 USD      4.000 pc        33.3         1,446.67      1,446.96
        Account 2:  6,400.00 USD      8.000 pc        66.7         2,893.33      2,893.04
    The small difference of $0.29 for this example is inconsequential, but for larger quantieis it will have a greater impact on the account allocation.

    U set or U dont set system will flag the GR non valuated once u assign multiple account assignment.
    But SAP is coming up with GR valuated for Multiple account assignment in enhancement package 4.
    Check out EP4 Presentation at........
    https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/erp-ehp
    Venkat

  • Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

    Dear Experts,
    While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
    reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
    In that purchase order we have given
    multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A  50% cost center B 10% Cost Center  C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
    but
    system is flagging message
    Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
    assignment
    Message no. ME717
    What will be the possible cause?
    regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
    10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
    and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
    Regards,
    satish

  • GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
    We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
    But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
    We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
    The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
    It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
    The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
    This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
    But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
    Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hi Srivatsan ?
    In ECC, you have a configuration point :
    Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

    Hi Guys,
    We created  a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
    While doing IR it is giving error
    1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
    2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
    what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
    Regards
    palani

    Hi,
    I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up.  Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account?  Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
    Cheers,
    HT

  • 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'  Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item

    'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'  -> This BAPI works perfectly without the  'account assignment' option . But  for purchase requisitions which have account assignments  BAPI returns the error  - E|8W |185   |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
    Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
    My coding I have done like below.
    DATA: pohead  TYPE bapimepoheader.
    DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
    CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
    DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
    DATA: return  TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poitem  TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: posched  TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: POACCOUNT  TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
      pohead-comp_code = '1000'.   "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
      pohead-doc_type   = 'NB'     .
      pohead-creat_date = sy-datum   .
      pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
      pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
      pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
      pohead-langu      = sy-langu   .
      pohead-doc_date   = sy-datum.
      poheadx-comp_code  = c_x.
      poheadx-doc_type   = c_x.
      poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
      poheadx-vendor     = c_x.
      poheadx-langu      = c_x.
      poheadx-purch_org  = c_x.
      poheadx-pur_group  = c_x.
      poheadx-doc_date   = c_x.
      poitem-po_item    = iLineItem.      "1.
      poitem-material   = req_item-MATERIAL.   " '000000000040000234'.
      poitem-plant      = req_item-PLANT.
      poitem-quantity   = req_item-QUANTITY.
      poitem-net_price  = NET_PRICE.
      poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
      poitem-shipping   = 'Z1'.
      poitem-preq_no    = req_item-PREQ_NO.
      poitem-preq_item  = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
      poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
      APPEND poitem.
      poitemx-po_item    = iLineItem. "1.
      poitemx-po_itemx   = c_x.
      poitemx-material   = c_x.
      poitemx-plant      = c_x .
      poitemx-quantity   = c_x .
      poitemx-tax_code   = c_x .
      poitemx-item_cat   = c_x .
      poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
      poitemx-net_price  = c_x.
      poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
      poitemx-shipping   = c_x.
      poitemx-preq_no    = c_x.
      poitemx-preq_item  = c_x.
      poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
      APPEND poitemx.
      POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
      POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
      POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
      POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.       
      POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.       
      POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
      APPEND POACCOUNT.
      POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
      POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
      POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
      APPEND POACCOUNTX.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
        EXPORTING
          poheader  = pohead
          poheaderx = poheadx
        IMPORTING
        exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
        expheader        = exp_head
        TABLES
          return    = return
          poitem    = poitem
          poitemx   = poitemx
          POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
          POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.

    I  found the answer

  • Urgent plz...Error: Multiple Account assignment in  BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE

    Hi All,
    I'm using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE to create the PR . The PR is created successfully with service lines. The service lines for PR item has to be assigned to different account assignment. My problem is that account assignment is not getting assigned to the service line for multiple account assignment cases, instead the account assignment is blank for the sevice line.
    Here is part of my code.
    For Account Assignment
    t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000630010'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801112560'.
    append t_requisitionaccoun
    t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '02'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
    t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
    append t_requisitionaccoun
    t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00020'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
    t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
    append t_requisitionaccoun
    For Service account Assignment
    *<b>PR item 10</b>
    Service item 1
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
    APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
    Service item 2
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 3.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '02'
    APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
    *<b>PR item 20</b>
    Service item 1
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000004'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
    APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
    With this code, what I get is the blank account assignment for PR item 10 and correctly filled account assignment for PR item 20.
    Does anyone done this before and can give me some help. Thanks.

    Hi, can you send me an example of this BAPI.
    I have the same requeriment, i'm new with bapis
    thanks

  • PO with hundreds of multiple account assignment lines on service line level

    Hi, experts,
    I want to create a external service PO with multiple account assignment.
    However, in the service line item level, when I click on the multiple account assignment, I could only enter 97 lines. But I need to create around 1000 account assignment lines for a single service line.
    Is it possible to extend the no. of account assignment lines inside the service line level? May I know how to do so?
    Thanks & regards,
    James

    I'm facing a similar error. 
    What I think it's happening is that for technical reasons the program involved only delivers 99 line items... To make things worse, When you try to create an invoice for that full item you are going to get an error bc the invoice reserves line 99 for unplanned account assignments.
    The suggestion from SAP is to create further items with 98 account assignment items or less.
    Have a look at these notes: 486808, 651784
    Regards,
    Nelson
    PS: Please rewards points for helpful answers

  • Multiple Account Assignment details for Service PRs

    Hi,
           I have developed a RFC for creating PRs. For multiple service PRs, multiple services are getting created but account assignment details getting created only for the first service line item. Iu2019m using BAPI_REQUISISTION_CREATE. Please provide me a solution.
    Regards,
    N.Senthil

    hi all,
          the issue has been resolved by passing the below mentioned values.
          wa_item_data-distrib = '1'.      "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT based on the quanlity
          wa_item_data-part_inv = '1'.     "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT
    solution got from
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE
    http://www.sapnet.ru/viewtopic.php?p=9306
    Regards,
    N.Senthil

  • MIGO in case of multiple account assignment.

    Hi,
    I have created PO with multiple account assignment. AAC is P.
    While doing MIGO, FI document is not getting generated.
    Can anyone plz explain how multiple account assignment functionality works?
    Regards
    Nilesh

    Hi
    Its a standard practice that if there is multiple account assignment, the proportion will not be appearing at the time of MIGO. It will get updated only at the time of Invoice verification.
    Regards,
    Lakshmanan Krishnan

  • GR Printing For Single Line Item With Multiple Account Assignment.

    Hi All,
    There is PO for projects (Account Assignment -P - Network) in which in a single item consist of multiple account assignment.
    Noe while entering the GR I select "Collective Slip" option but when the GR is posted system automatically select option "Individual slip" and seprate line item are printed for each account assignment.
    The printing program is standard SAPM07DR. The SAP version is 4.7. Can anyone tell what is ther any setting in configuration or is it problem in program or smart form
    Thanks & Regards,
    Omkar

    hi
    please check your form and routine used to print.

  • Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP

    Hi Gurus,
    We are in SRM 4 SP13  and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that  PO subsequently.
    When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment  and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres   the PR created  with
    Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
    Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
    But for Services it is created as
    Distribution :  Distribution by percentage  and
    Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
    For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
    Is this a standard behaviour  or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Rajesh

    Hi there,
    Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when          
    sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:                                                                               
    SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv              
    to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.                                                                               
    It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with           
    multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is           
    proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this             
    indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi               
    to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.                                                                               
    You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you            
    can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.                    
    This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.                                
    You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
    ======================================                                                                               
    set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services         
    for material items and the service lines                          
    it is derived from distribution type in EBP                       
        IF next > 1.                                                    
          IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR                                 
             po_items-item_cat = '1' .                                  
            po_items-distrib = '2'.    "prozentuale Verteilung          
          ENDIF.                                                        
          po_items-part_inv = '1'.      <<<<       Hard Coded to "1"    
          MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
        ELSE.                                                           
          CLEAR po_items-distrib.    "prozentuale Verteilung            
          MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.                                
        ENDIF.                                                          
      ENDLOOP.                                                                               
    CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.                                                                               
    ======================================         
    Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
    Hope this points you in the right direction.
    Regards,
    Matthew

Maybe you are looking for

  • Open VI Reference for a Project Library VI

    Hi, my code calls some subVIs by reference by using "Open VI Reference" and "Call by Reference" VIs. Now, "Open VI Reference" expects a path to the VI: When the SubVIs sit in the same folder as the calling VI, it is easy to simply supply the name of

  • Finding EXPORT pair of an IMPORT statement

    Hi! I found an IMPORT xyz INTO xyz FROM MEMORY ID xyz. statement in a user-exit. However I don't know exactly where is it's pair, and I don't know the easiest way to identify it's program, where this global variable is filled. It could be in other us

  • How do I know if the apps are free or not if I already have them on my ipad??

    How do I know if the apps are free or not if I already have them on my ipad?? I have an ipad and it was open by another person's Apple ID and all the applications too. Now I have change the Apple ID by my name and I wanted to update the apps and I ca

  • Problem with barcode font in Forms9i

    I need urget help with the following matter: I'm using a barcode font to display a text item. In developer everything is ok, but when i run the form in the web browser, the barcode font is replaced with another normal font (arial i think)! I don't kn

  • PR release strategy-ERROR

    Gurus, I am trying to assign for PR rel strategy,i am getting this error. Error in classification (class RP_XX class type 032) Message no. ME179 Procedure Please check the specified class or class type in Customizing for the release procedure. What s