"release to accouting" question

All,
I have question regarding the "release to accounting" functionality from the billing document.
Is there a configuration that will limit the accounting document to be "parked" rather than posted? Currently this posts an accounting document directly.
Thanks.
RKK

I think you want to post to accounting manually rather than automatic posting. In t.code VOFA define billing type you can set posting block fo the billing type to avoid automatic posting
Another option is to activate manual invoice maintenance indicator in your customer master so that the same will be copied to your billing document and will not allow to post document until you remove this indicator from billing doc.

Similar Messages

Pre-release Io-HD question

I know that it isn't released yet, in fact, I still don't know when it is scheduled for even after googling the heck out of it, but I have a fairly simple question about it's inputs. This is purely curiosity talking since I probably can't afford the Io-HD and also it being complete overkill if it can do this. My question is, I see that it accepts Y/Pb/Pr and my HDV camera has a component connection, but not HDMI. As a result, I can only capture via the firewire, which I've been told I can't easily convert into something like DVCPRO HD. Now my camera gives an HD output via the component, so could I plug my camera into the Io-HD and import full HD through it? I'm also wondering if that's useless since HDV is already heavily compressed and pulling into ProRes 422 is meant for uncompressed HD at SD data rates, there's be no advantage in doing so.
I know that this is all pre-release, but I bet many of you readers were at NAB this past week, or at least may have read something I didn't and have an answer, or maybe you just know the answer already. Any suggestions or ideas are appreciated.
Thanks,
-Brian

Andy, The Io HD is worth every dime if you can use it. Solutions like this cost thousands more before it. Crossconversion standalone box, works with any intel MBP or MP. Makes capturing from cameras with TC outs a snap.
Its a wonder. I actually think that costs going down will actually cover the expense of the box in no time. Capturing on the set is the way to go for most applications. The editor has to become familiar with the footage anyway... have him do the job for you on the set.
P2 brought this to the forefront I think. All the mistakes get caught and reshot right then and there... it's a wonderful thing all round.
Editor gets his roughs done right there on the set... I like this for all but a few things... I don't believe editors should be on narative film shoots.
Io HD captures any format except dual link. Turns any of the formats to the others too.... think of the uses... it's endless. MBP's are all you need for this. Add a matrox MXO to the mix and a 23" display and you have external video for the DP, director and editor too for under $2,000. MXO now has a blue only gun complete with proc amp controls. (new at NAB). Makes it very viable now I believe. You could buy any HD monitor of course too, but not without spending a bit more. Gotta have dem blue only views for calibration.
Let alone being able to capture to the Pro Res format on a laptop... to a cheap set of drives external SATA even FW raids would be more than adequate. G-Tech mini raid anyone? The costs in storage ALONE pay for this box. One would be best off buying this before he spent a ton on fast storage. It cuts storage and makes laptops actually edit the "real thing". works with towers of course. Has a handle and pretty lights. (they are the audio level during input)
Jerry

Error while releasing to accouting.

Hi,
in VF02 when we try to release to accounting, getting the error " Reconciliation account XXXX or short key 00 is not permitted "
Message no. F5788
Diagnosis
The system checked the entry to see whether a reconciliation account exists with the number 13401109 and whether it can be entered here, or whether the first two characters of your entry '00' form a permitted short key. Neither of these options is applicable to your entry.
System Response
Error message
Procedure
Enter either a permitted G/L account number or a permitted short key.
how to slove it?
Thanks,
Shwetha

Hi,
Check whether the reconciliation account assigned in customer master exist.
Regards,
Ashutosh

Error While Billing doc releasing to accouting

Dear Gurus,
when i Releasing to accounting billing document it is giving me Error.
below mentioned is error mess, please have a look and giv me solution.
No account is specified in item 0000001002
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000001002" of the FI/CO document.
System response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000001002" of the FI/CO document.

Check the account key mapped to conditions of the item 0000001002 in billing document. It appears that the GL account is not maintained against account key used in one of the conditions. Maintain GL account in VKOA transaction against account key.
Edited by: Ramesh Reddy Nalamada on Apr 18, 2009 10:04 PM

Release 4.4 question

Does 4.4 provide tether support for Canon 6D?

There is no mention of it in the release notes for it: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/
And if it is, any indication Canon hasn't yet released it to their SDK: http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/standard_display/sdk_homepage#SDKQ7
Perhaps by final 4.4 release-who knows?

Release to accounting question

Hi there:
It generated three accounting document once we release billing to accounting, is there any configuratin to trigger that?

Hi Allen,
Please clarify this again, where you able to create 3 different accounting documents with 3 different accounting document numbers or you had created one accounting document which got posted to different GL accounts.
the former is not possible because once the accounting document is created, the billing documents completion status will be updated, if this was not done then only you may have such situation, if that is the case it will be because of improper table update, for which a standard program would have been suggested by SAP.
the later is a standard behaviour.
Thanks & Regards
Ilango

How do you cope with releases of your custom Portal Content (PCD Content)?

Dear SDN Community,
I'm very interested in how you cope with release management in the Portal (PCD).
Where I'm focusing on is the release of a "project" trough your landscape (Dev, Test, QA, Prod)
When starting a project you start with a new folder lets say "My Custom App" that contains all your content.
Once done you transport to Test, QA and eventually Prod. Now the Content is in use and roles are assigned.
Request for changes arive from the customer and eventually a new release need to be implemented.
Offcourse you could then change/update the content in the initial folder and transport that to Test, QA again but you will not be able to fix incidents while creating the new release because objects maybe touched.
I was thinking about a scenario where you create subfolders in your application folder, see example below:
\ "My Custom App"
|--- Release 1.0
|--- Release 1.1
|--- Release 2.0
|--- Current
You only do this on your Dev system. Everytime a Release is OK you put it in the "Current" folder and transport this to Prod.
Using this you won't have to change the Role assignments in your different landscapes as they are always pointing to the "Current" folder. In addition this scenario enables you to provide Pilot rollouts to smaller groups parallel to the Major release.
My question to you is to shoot on it and give your oppinion/feedback... where possible provide links to SAP document or best practices that describe this subject...
Thnx in advance,
Benjamin Houttuin

Hi Bejamin,
It is an interesting approach you describe and I see no reason it should not work.
The only thing which can create some problems is that the object ID of roles must be unique. For example com.mycom.roles.roleA cannot exist in two separate folders in the PCD. For all other PCD objects it is the PCD ID which must be unique and this includes the folder prefix.
In my experience, the most natural solution for this in large portal environments is to have both a version and a production line.
The production line will be your standard sandbox, development, test/QA, production and the version line will consist of an development and test/QA systems.
Long running projects for enhancements to existing functionality will be done in the version line, before being transported to the production line when ready for GoLive. This makes even more sense when you have version lines for backend systems your portal are using which are modified at the same time.
Whilst the project is running, the production line can be used for changes to the current version, but it is important to note that all these changes have to be migrated into the version line in order to make sure they are not overwritten.
Of course, a version line brings extra cost related to synchronization and similar, so it is not always it makes sense.
Amit's two documents of large portal installations might be somewhat relevant:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bec9711e-0701-0010-e4ac-84f50543bfa9
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/25cab009-0801-0010-1380-edaa1d5e7f85
Regards
Dagfinn

Two applet questions

Hi there,
I don't know if it's good to post two questions in one post, but I think it's okay since they are just small questions.
First one: When an applet is dragged out of a browser, I have to close the browser if I want Java to ask me if I want to create a desktop shortcut. Is it possible to change this behaviour, or will it be changed in the next release?
Second question: How can I re-integrate a JavaFX-Applet into the webpage? There seems to be no other possibility than to use that default small close button provided by Java, but I'd like to call it from the code. That must be possible?

Yes, I tried this, but it leads to "java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can not call FX.exit() twice".
Is there some way to do it like it is in standard java? Because there's the possibility to implement a function for the closeListener (or something like that), and then it's possible to directly call the listener to put the applet back into the page. And it hides the standard close button. Maybe we get this functionality in JFX 1.3?
I'm currently using stage.close(), but that leads to the problems I already described.

Reg: Workflow for Overall Purchase Requisition Release

Hi Experts,
I have got a requirement in Overall or Header level PR release.
My question is,
for Header Level release,
I am using BUS2105 and what are the event I need to maintain,
so that my workflow get trigger.
Regards,
Shriraam

Hello ShriRam,
         You have to use RELEASESTEPCREATED event if release steps are configured.
          If no release steps are configured,you can use CREATED event.In such case, you have to implement a BAdI named ME_REQ_POSTED.
         In either case, you have to use the change document BANF in the transaction code SWEC.
Regards,
S.Suresh

Report release - Product Safety

Hi all,
I read on the SAP help portal, and I read this portion on the report release process. One of the example shown is like the following process flow:
1st - GS u2013 Report generated successful
2nd u2013 R1: Report accept by the Toxicologist
3rd u2013 R2: Report accept by the lawyer
4th u2013 CO: last status complete
5th u2013 RE: Report released.
My question is why a report create in EHS environment has to go through so many status (i.e. by several party) before it is finally released.
I am trying to understand from the point of business in EHS environment.
Can someone explain to me?
Thanks,
Karen.

Hi Karen,
In EHS,the reports which are created or distributed need to be legally compliant considering the environement impact of the substance .So in the creation phase,the template is made and the report is created as per the R&D persons or those who know the specific properties of the substance(Experts who know the properties of substance)
Once the report is ready this need to be analysed by the concerned departments for the properties / subsance characteristics by the toxicologist or some one who is familiar with the physical and chemical properties of the substance( Like exposure to the environment or toxicity in water,air etc) .Once they approve,the report should be checked for the legal compliance.For example,in which validity area ,what regulations etc..this is done and approved by some one from legal department.
Once all the approvals are done,the report is in completed phase.Now the same can be released/distributed across an interface.
Programs RCVDDISP,RCVDEVEN and RC1wwiwp trigers in background in report generation.
Hope this helps
Thanks
George

Purchase requisition release (WS00000038)

Hi
I'm, testing the workflow WS00000038 for liberate purchases requisition.
The workflow run succesfully, when i liberate the purchase requisition, this follow the standard flow correctly and send the respective workitems (TS00007986, TS00008018 ), to the respectives actors.
But in the case when i receive the request for liberate but reject the position, the workflow don't execute the TS00008014, negative conformation, the workflow, follow the alternative events (SIGNIFICATLYCHANGED), that finish the workflow, and don't send message to the initiator of workflow.
I don't know why the workflow don't execute the standard task (TS00008014) when the event was triggered, in the transacción when i execute the reject of position.
For your suggestions.
Thanks

Hi all,
Here's the scenario: We are developing our workflow strategy for purchase reqs. We have several levels of approval based on Purchasing group,Rel code, amount, and so forth. My problem is when the first rel code is release PR and he has also able to release other .my question is if one rel code release a person does not authorised to release other . I am using standard workflow template like WS00000038.
Is that possible? If so, please advice..
Thanks in advance. Points will be given..

SD Released accounting Documents

Hi,
Can any body face the problem like this???
There are many (approx 200) that have status billing documents as being released to accounting. However, there are no accounting documents. We are certain there should be. VF02 - Release to Acctg does not work because SAP thinks it's already released. Any idea how to reset the flag so we can "re-release"?
If anybody knows how to do that, please reply me as soon as you can. your help would really appreciate.
Thanks,
Dhaval Shah.

I would suggest (if the problem is not resolved after re-releasing in VFX3), to search for OSS notes. There are couple of OSS notes with this SD and Fi _ releasing to accouting.
regards
S

How Release Strategy is picked up

Hi,
There are many release strategies configured in the system for various company code/P Grp/Plants combination.However for newly introduced territory and the respective company code/plants combination,the configuration has not yet been carried out.
Even though a configuration is not done, when a PO is manually created for one of the combination for this territory system does allow to successfully save the PO suggesting 'unable to determine Release Strategy'
My question is what is the driving parameter which is coming in to picture in this case which prevents me to create & save a PO for testing with this error.
Please suggest
BM

Hello Arjman,
The driving parameter here is the combination of Release Group, Release Class for External Purchasing Documents- indicator 2. Since you have configured a class for External Purchasing documents.. PO in this case, he message becomes relevant, however since none of your strategies or classification data exist, the system fails to derive a strategy

Official Nokia C7 PR1.1 Release Schedule

As with N8, we now have the C7 Release Schedule available for you. This list will be updated regularly with release timings for different countries and variants. So, if you’re not sure about the availability for your phone, just take a look at the list.
Status: 13th April 2011
The release schedule for C7 PR1.1 is attached as an Excel file.
To check the Software Update availability for your phone, please first search for your country and then have a look for your specific productcode. (Your productcode information can be found by typing *#0000# on your C7.)
Status "Published" means that the software update is available for download
via your C7 (use Menu > Applications > Tools > SW Update > tick C7-00 Device Update and then follow the on screen prompts) or
via PC (connect your phone via USB and use OviSuite).
If you need more instructions just post here and we'll assist you.
Status "In creation" means your version is currently with our software teams. We can't give a specific day here, but you can switch on the automatic software update check in your phone (via Menu > Applications > Tools > SW Update > Options > Settings > Auto-check for updates) and your C7 will prompt you as soon as the new software is available. Please be aware that there may be delays for your code if pre-release testing highlights an issue that needs to be resolved prior to release.
Any questions, just ask us!
Yvonne
Attachments:
C7 PR1 1 & PR1.2 status (130411).xls ‏70 KB

Ok, I'll answer one by one:
- Week07 is the calendar week, meaning it will be released this week when it's listed as "in creation"
- Product codes that are missing in the excel sheet are not with our software team yet - this is mostly due to us waiting for approvals from operators, who want to test the software first
- Creating this list is manual work & we therefore can only do that for N8 & C7. At the moment I can't give any information about other products & software releases. If you activate the autocheck in your phone, it will automatically tell you when a new software is available.
- There are separate software update packages created for PC-update and in device-update - so it could be that one of those packages is available faster than the other.

Release Strategy for Condition Records

Hi,
This is a requirement from my client. The client needs to give 4 levels of release strategy for the condition records created. The selling price for the products will be entered by person 1. This has to be approved by the sales execute (person 2); then by the sales manager (person 3); finally by the General Manager (Person 4). The selling price of the products ranges from 10 lakhs to 40 lakhs. so, the release strategy is needed. This type of release strategy is available in MM for PR and PO. Please let me know whether similar facility is available in SD. Any alternative is also solicited.
Regards,
K Bharathi

Hi,
Thanks for your valuable reply.
I defined 3 Processing status (Menu path: SPRO >> SD >> Basic Fn >> Pricing >> Define Processing status). They are EU-End user, KU-Key user, MD-Final authority. These processing statuses are assigned to Release status. First two processing status EU, KU were assigned to A (Blocked). The third processing status MD was assigned to Blank (Released). The purpose is: at processing status EU one person will upload the price master. Second person will check the price and will change the processing status to KU if he satisfies with the accuracy of the price master. The third person (final authority) will check the price and set the Processing status MD. Once the condition record gets the status MD, the prices can be used for creating sales order because it is released.
In the condition record for PR00, when I enterthe processing status EU or KU the release status shows 'Blocked' release statuses. When I enter MD in the processing status, the release status show 'released'.
My question is how can assign the responsibilities of changing the processing statuses EU to KU, KU to MD to two different persons.
Regards,
K Bharathi

"release to accouting" question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for