Released Document not appearing.

Hello All,
There is a issue in our system.
We have a Purchase Requisition which is released in Live system.
When we log in with English Language then we can see the Document is released for all levels, but when we are logging in thru some Other Language say "RU", in the document we cannot see any Release happened.
Any idea why this is happening?
regards,
Prashant Rathore.

Plz maintain the characteristis in RU language
go to CT04 trxn and in the Descriptions maintain in RU Language
Similarlt go to CL02 trxn and enter your class and click the 'change language' and maintain in RU langauge..
Then go to Spro > Materials Management > Purchasing > Purchase Requisition > Release Procedure > Procedure with Classification > Set Up Procedure with Classification > Release Strategies
Here select the Release Strategy on top click Goto > Transalation and choose RU Language..
then check the PR by logging in RU Language

Similar Messages

Create Service Agreement - In Status field, "Release" is not appearing.

Hi folks,
I am creating a simple Service Agreement in CRM Web UI. Entered all data required like Customer, product, org details, price discount etc.. and tried to "release" before saving.
In the Status field "Release" option is not there to select. I see only "In Process" and "Completed".
Can anybody tell me how to make 'Release' available, so that I can release the document and save it.
The price is not determined for the product. Could that be the reason?
The document is error free as I don't see errors in App log.
Please give me and idea to resolve. Will be generous in giving points.
Regards,
John

Hi Shashidar,
Thank you for your response. Here is the following steps I did:
1. Status profile is CRMORDER
2. In this status profile, I see the following:   Open with status No.10
                                                                    In Process - 20
                                                                    Completed - 30
                                                                    Rejected - 40
3. I added a new entry for Released with status number: 50
4. I have taken care of the Lowest and Highest Limits.
5. I also checked the 'Object Type' as 'Agreement'
Now, I am not clear which Business Trans I should assign. In the drop down list, I see many Bus.Trans for 'Release'
such as APRL - Release / CALL - Release / CREL - Release and so on.
My question is, which one of these should I select. I tried couple of them, it did not work. (Release still not appearing on CRM7.0 Web UI)
Currently, I am trying to release a Service Agreement on the Web UI. I played around with lowest and highest limits a couple of times and it changes accordingly in Web UI. But some reason 'Release' is not visible which carries the status No.50.
I wonder what is going wrong. Any help would be well appreciated with generous points.
Thank you in advance,
Fred

Vendor open items appearing in FBl1 but same documents not appearing F-44.

Hi,
Vendor open items appearing in FBl1 but same documents not appearing F-44.
Please help me in this.
Thanks
GP

Hi,
F-44 is used for clearing vendor - header data. Check if there are both debit and credit entries for the vendor and if it exists then clear using F-44. Check the entries correctly in FBL1.
regards,
radhika

F-44: The Re-document not appear available to do the clearing.

Hi
Experts
Hi,
We need help to understand what hapen with the consult of vendor XXXXX
When we consult this vendor on transaction FK10N we see the information detailed on the attached file.
But when I try to do the clearing and try the transaction F-44, the re-document not appear available to do the clearing.
But when I try to do the clear vendor on F-44 the documents ( 4000000419   1700000135 and 1500000456 ) not appear and I not understand why?
But this Document No's are seen in FBL1N as a Open Items and also as a Cleared Items, But not able to see in F-44
4000000419    06/27/2011
1700000135    07/14/2011
1500000456    03/30/2011
Could you please help me with this issue?
Anil

hI
Friend,
I Checked SE11 REGUP table, if the documents You don't see by F-44 are already contained into a payment proposal.
If Yes, You should delete the F110 payment proposal to see them by F-44.
I deleted the payment proposal, even though Iam not able to see the docuements in F-44. what to do?
I Checked the table BSIK and Also BSAK it is showing this docu nos.
Anil

Documents appearing in FBL1 but same documents not appearing in F-44

Hi,
Vendor open items appearing (Documents) in FBL1 but same documents not appearing in F-44.
I executed FBL1 with input values:
Vendor
Company code
Open items
Normal items
I executed F-44 with input values:
Vendor, company code
OI check box
None under additional selection
Kindly help me in above case.
Thanks
GP

Hi gangappa,
For that first u check in F110 there u delete unwanted proposals through keep the cursor on run date field and select F4 there not yet complete proposals are available first delete that .
Second option
check it is it any advance payment. if any acvance payment plz select special gl indicator in F-44
May be this information is useful to you
Regards
Surya

Migo reference document not appearing in miro for frieght conditions

Dear all,
I ahve done migo for a po and i have checked GR based invoice in PO.When i am doing MIRO i am not getting the migo reference number for frieght condition where as the migo reference number is appearing for base price.How to get that migo reference number for frieght conditions also.
thanks in advance
regards
vithal

Sometimes the the MIGO creator might have reversed the same. In such cases the reversal document may be with different number in the same series and both posted & reversed documents will not appear in MIRO. Since you might checking with posted document number, you are seeing the blank in MIRO. In such cases, just enter the PO number in MIRO, give date & reference number press Show PO structure button in the left corner. You will find the following screen
Expand the required once. The following screen appears. In this both positive & negative numbers with same reference & document type appearing are the reversed documents.
Hope this is clear

Invoice document not appearing in follow-on document list

Dear All,
I am customizing Classic scenario for my client. In our process, Shopping cart only created in SRM 5.0 system where as all follow-on document - PR/PO/GR/IV will be created on back-end SAP ECC 6.0 system.
My Issue:
1. Shopping cart appears in requested 'Check Status' list till the time PR, PO and GR created in back-end ECC system.
SC disappear in the requester 'Check status' list the moment invoice entered in back-end ECC system. Do the problem
is due to authorization issue ?
2. Other user who has SRM-Administrator authorization can view all such shopping cart in 'Monitor shopping cart' option.
All follow-on document such as PR, PO and confirmation are appearing in Status check option both in graphics as well
as table form. However invoice document is not appearing in the follow on document list. Do I need to enable any
customization setting so that back-end invoice will appear in follow-on document list ?
<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
Thanks in advance.
Regds,
Jennifer
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 1, 2010 4:10 PM

My problem got resolved.

1 document not appearing in TDs certificate

Hello,
While previewing TDS certificate,
every thing is printed really properly except that 1 document of WTAX amount of rs 400 is not appearing in the certificate.
Business place and section codes are maintained.
Please suggest any solution.
Regards,
Devang

Hi,
What kind of document that is?
Check whether in vendor master recepient type is not maintained or not?
Any changes in vendor master withholding tax tab?
Check the line item exist in table WITH_ITEM and J1INMIS
Check and revert back.
Regards,
Sankar

April 2015 Release KB2952664 Not Appearing in SCCM

I've withheld deploying previous versions of KB2952664 since it initial release after seeing multiple reports of troubles and failed installs. It's now at version 7 and I haven't seen any similar troubles with the latest release, however I'm
now noticing that it is not appearing in the SCCM console as an available update. I've looked into the WSUS console on the server but am only finding the declined versions prior to the April 14 2015 release. Has anybody else seen this and what has
been done to get it available in SCCM?

The Windows Emulators require a physical machine that runs Windows 8.1 (x64) Professional edition or higher, and a processor that supports Client Hyper-V and Second Level Address Translation (SLAT). The emulators will not run when Visual Studio is installed
in a Virtual Machine (VM).
The emulators for Universal Windows app development work best with Windows 10.

SODIS, email disclosure documents not appearing in emails... SOLVED

Hi all,
recently uncovered a useful item to make note of, while trying to modify email headers, previously posted in Re: Email - adding custom SMTP header to outgoing email.
In this instance, I was sending email with ABAP code using classes cl_bcs, cl_document_bcs, etc. and setting up email disclosure documents through tx SODIS. I set up disclosure documents for individual users (notably, our workflow user WF-BATCH and my User ID), but when sending email in code using those users (sender and recipient), noticed that only the Standard/Default email disclosure statement was being appended to emails as they were released from SOST.
The problem appeared to be the manner in which I was creating the sender and recipient objects in my code. I was using cl_cam_address_bcs to create a sender and receiver (note, I have used USERNAME_FROM and USERNAME_TO to demonstrate the different users and their role in sending/receiving emails...):
data:
    lo_bcs type ref to cl_bcs,
    lo_sender type ref to cl_cam_address_bcs,
    lo_recipient type ref to cl_cam_address_bcs,
    lv_ret type os_boolean.
lo_bcs = cl_bcs=>create_persistent( ).
lo_sender = cl_cam_address_bcs=>create_user_home_address( i_user = 'USERNAME_FROM' ).
lo_bcs->set_sender( i_sender = lo_sender ).
lo_recipient = cl_cam_address_bcs=>create_user_home_address( i_user = 'USERNAME_TO' ).
lo_bcs->add_recipient(
    i_recipient = lo_recipient
    i_copy = '' " CC indicator
* create document and add to lo_bcs with lo_bcs->set_document( lo_doc )
lv_ret = lo_bcs->send( ).
This is fine and will work to send to external addresses (i.e. to send an email to Outlook) but if the sender is WF-BATCH, it will not find the correct disclosure document I created for WF-BATCH.
After much debugging, I noticed that the address type of the sender had to be 'B' (SAP User) when the disclosure document was selected, but the cl_cam_address_bcs doesn't allow creation of SAP User addresses. It only allows the six (6) external comm. types INT, X400, RML, PRT, PAG and FAX. No 'B'. Problem.
I found it here:
FG SOE2
FM SO_OBJECT_MIME_GET
FORM GET_MIME
Class method cl_bcs_send_request->as_mime_message( )
Class method cl_bcs_send_request->add_disclosure_to_mime( ) [added as part of OSS Note 1086090]
Class method cl_disclosure_bcs->get_disclosure( )
Class method cl_disclosure_bcs->resolve( )
(Here you can see the try statement and a case statement - this is where the action happens)
However, this class cl_cam_address_bcs does implement interface if_sender_bcs, so it was relatively easy to find out what other classes implement if_sender_bcs. Turns out, cl_sapuser_bcs does this and it defaults to the address type 'B' - SAP User. So I replaced the above code in my program, with the following:
data:
    lo_bcs type ref to cl_bcs,
    lo_sender type ref to cl_sapuser_bcs,
    lo_recipient type ref to cl_sapuser_bcs,
    lv_ret type os_boolean.
lo_bcs = cl_bcs=>create_persistent( ).
lo_sender = cl_sapuser_bcs=>create( 'USERNAME_FROM' ).
lo_bcs->set_sender( i_sender = lo_sender ).
lo_recipient = cl_sapuser_bcs=>create( 'USERNAME_TO' ).
lo_bcs->add_recipient(
    i_recipient = lo_recipient
    i_copy = '' " CC indicator
* create document and add to lo_bcs with lo_bcs->set_document( lo_doc )
lv_ret = lo_bcs->send( ).
Et voila! The disclosure statement for USERNAME_FROM was applied perfectly.
Now there are other ways to achieve this, such as using the email address filter when creating the disclosure document, but I like to keep it to the system-used username rather than an ambiguous email address that could potentially change.
So if you find that your disclosure documents aren't being applied correctly in code-generated emails, there's your answer. Hope that little break-down helps someone.
Hagen

Hi
What are the values we need to pass for lo_doc
Regards
Madhan D

Css document not appearing

Hello Dreamwevaers.
i have managed to attach my source code to my style sheet,but when i go to my style.css i dont see the following
in my sheet.
/* CSS DOCUMENT */
does that mean the css wont work?or is it somethig i can even type myself in,if dreamweaver doesnt do it for me?
thank you.

davidhelp wrote:
Firefox will ignore this but IE won't. The page will not display until the  ) just before the closing </style> tag.
i.e.
<style>

</style>
If that closing HTML comment fragment --> is missing, which is the most common issue, then IE treats all the code on the page from the opening HTML comment fragment to the first closing --> it finds on the page (or failing that the closing </body> tag) as part of one big comment i.e. most or all code on the page is ignored so no page appears at all in IE.
Note: the HTML comment inside the <style> tag is no longer required at all. It was a workaround introduced because very old browsers (10+ years ago) did not recognize <style> tags (and therefore ignored them) and treated all CSS rules inside <style> tags as plain text on a page. So instead of a nicely styled page, the browser re-printed the CSS rules verbatim on the finished page. Wrapping the embedded CSS rules in HTML comment tags meant that browsers which could not understand <style> tags also ignored any text i.e. CSS rules, encountered inside those tags. This scenario no longer applies in modern browsers so the HTML comment no longer serves any purpose (unless that closing --> fragment is missing).

Documents not appearing in Pages/Numbers

I've uploaded a number of documents from my MacBook Air (OS X 10.7.2), when I open Pages or Numbers on my iPhone 4S (iOS 5), none of the documents show up, or I just don't know how to access them. Thoughts?

Hi Badri,
The default content access account should have Full read permission at the
web application level.
No need to give permission to any site collection individually.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc678863(v=office.14).aspx#Section3
Check description under heading named default
content access account
To know,how to give permission at web application level,then refer the below url.
http://www.dotnetmafia.com/blogs/dotnettipoftheday/archive/2010/10/19/how-to-properly-set-permissions-on-your-search-crawl-account-in-sharepoint-2010.aspx
Note: Please mark this as answer & helpful if this resolves your problem.
Best Regards,
Pavan Kumar Sapara.
s p kumar

Purchase Document not appearing on GL Line item report

Hi gurus: Please help me figure out why even though I have activated the purchase document field in the field status group I still cannot see it in the line item reports when I run FBL3n. Note the purchase document field is showing up as a field for selection but it comes thru blank.
Please help me
thanks
Brian

i wanted to get the same output, it doesnt work for some reason. I had to craete a query to achieve this

In FI Line Item Display Purchase Document Not appearing

Dear All,
Could you please help me, how i can get the Purchasing document Number in Line Item Report .
Thank you in advance.
KSK

Hi
You have to add Purchase Document (PO) as a special field in the line layout variant through customizing to view PO in the FBL3N Line layout,
Go to SPRO Settings - **** - GL Accounting - GL Accounts - Master Records - Line Items - Line Item Display - Define Special fields for finding and sorting data"
A message will be displayed that it is a cross client change. Presse nter
Before adding the special field PO, the line layout variant does not have the field PO
Click on New Entries button
Give the Table as BSEG and Field as EBELN.
And save.
Assign points if useful.
thanks
radhika

Document not appearing in FBL5N

Hi,
Invoice is generated for the month of April but i am not able to view the document related to same in FBL5N for particular customer. Rest all the documents for each month i can be able to view. Can you please tell me what could be possible reasons for this.?
Thanks.

Hello,
Please verify if you have necessary authorization to view vendor line items of specific group or account.
After you run FBL5N transaction code immediately execute transaction code /OSU53 to check if you need any additional authorization to view
vendor line items.
If it is authorization related issue then you can contact your system administrator to get additional authorizations.
Also check posting date and clearing date of the document.
If required change the selection in FBL5N screen as required.
Thanks!
Raju

Released Document not appearing.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for