REM MFBF Scrap posting not reflecting in MD04

Hi All,
If I am doing yield posting from MFBF i can see reduced quantity in MD04.
If I am doing scrap posting from MFBF quantity is not getting reduced from MD04.
how can i achieve it via ABAP coding. pleae help with any exit or sample code.
Thanks,
Chinna

Hello Chinna,
Please refer below thread for your issue
Scrap rate is set in bom but can't be consumed in REM
I hope this information helpful to you
Regards
Umesh Mali
Message was edited by: Caetano Almeida

Similar Messages

Storage location entry in ASN is not reflected in MD04 screen

Hi Gurus,
We are using scheduling agreements with confirmations (ASN) . For some business reason we change the storage in inbound delivery created against the SA . However change effect of storage location is not reflected in MD04 .
In MD04 screen storage location is getting defaulted from the scheduling agreement .
Why the system is not considering the storage location from the inbound delivery ?
Thanks in advance

Thanks for the reply.
Indeed it will appear in MD04 if you change in SA. However I don`t want do that , in certain cases only I want change at IBD level which should reflect in MD04. Is there a way to achieve this ?
Thanks in advance

Sales orders not reflecting in MD04

Hi all
Can anybody explain reason why sales orders are not reflecting to MD04. If possible kindly give config settings for this issue...!
Thanks in advance
Nadh

Hi,
Please check the check box for the CP and MRP combination in the SPRO setting and tick the check box for Availability check and requirment.
sales distribution --> basic Functions -->Availabiltiy chekc n transfer of req -->Define procedure for each schdule line category
I hope this is helful for you.
if still it is not solved ,please clarify whether r u using std requirement type or your own requirement type.
best Regards
Srinivas

Echo from WordPress post not reflecting post changes

I am developing a php site on my localhost and had been successful in establishing a Dreamweaver Binding to echo content from the site's attached blog posts to respective divs on the site's php pages. All was well until today. For some reason edit changes made to the blog post content are not be reflected to the echo content on the php pages. The echo displays pre-edit content minus the changes. This had been working for several days but suddenly stopped functioning. Does anyone have any ideas as to why.
Thanks in Advance.

You know, sometimes it only takes a night's sleep. I woke up this morning and discovered that I had not changed my database connection file back to my localhost from my remote connection. I am going to try to avoid posting questions late in the evening.

Problem:FM - ME_CONFIRMATION_INSERT_GR,changes are not reflecting in MD04

The problem with the Function modules ME_CONFIRMATION_INSERT_GR is that it updates the table EKES directly because of which the data in MD04 has two lines even if we confirm the full quantity. One line with MRP Element as ShpgNt (shipping notification) and another line with MRP Element as POitem. Instead it should display the full confirmed quantity in one line with MRP element as ShpgNt.
Also, BAPI_PO_CHANGE doesnu2019t work for updating the confirmation data.
Is there any way to reflect the change into MD04 through my Zreport .

The problem with the Function modules ME_CONFIRMATION_INSERT_GR is that it updates the table EKES directly because of which the data in MD04 has two lines even if we confirm the full quantity. One line with MRP Element as ShpgNt (shipping notification) and another line with MRP Element as POitem. Instead it should display the full confirmed quantity in one line with MRP element as ShpgNt.
Also, BAPI_PO_CHANGE doesnu2019t work for updating the confirmation data.
Is there any way to reflect the change into MD04 through my Zreport .

PR not reflected in MD04

Hi,
I am doing stock transfer thro'rule based.When save the sale order in R/3.I am getting my R/3 PR number in APO.But in MD04 i am not able to see the PR number.But in ME52N(change PR),I am able to see it.How i can fix this issue
regards
venkadesh

Hi Ken,
I have changed my default document type as ZZ instead NB.But i don't know what was the problem in NB.Now we are getting results.
thanks
venkadesh

Demand for Partial Schedule line not showing in MD04?

Hi All,
An SO with around 1200 line items, having problem with one line item, ordered qty is 20. Shipped a partial line of 6qty.Schedule line was showing order qty of 20, confirmed qty 6 but no second schedule line for the balance of 14 and the demand for the open qty 14 is not reflected in MD04. Tried manually and also manually running MRP for the item but neitger created a second line or triggered the demand to show in MD04.
Thanks in Advance.
Thankyou and Regards
Hatti.

Try creating the schedule line in the order and then running MRP for the demand to show in your stock requirements.

Schedule agreement not showing in MD04

Hi All
We have a schedule agreement created and its not reflecting in MD04. According to the thread i changed the avl check to 02.
But its still not showing in MD04. So my question is do I have to do any other thing so that the avl chk change will get affected for same schedule agrmnt or I have to create a new one so that it will show in MD04.
Thank You.

First you need to identify what schedule line category is flowing in your sale order. Normally, this would be CP. So next go to VOV6, select the schedule line category and execute. There tick the box for "Req./Assembly"
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Confirmed quantity of STO not properly reflected in MD04

I am facing following problem:
I Have created one STO for 20 pieces. In supplying plant only 10 pieces are available and rest 10 pieces will be available later. So, 10 pieces are confirmed for today (14.09.07) and rest 10 pieces are confirmed for 20.09.07 in STO.
Now when I look at transaction MD04 for receiving plant, all 20 pieces are shown against 14.09.07. This is the problem.
Can anyone please clarify above.
Thanks & regards,
Nilesh kumar

Thanks for the reply.
Indeed it will appear in MD04 if you change in SA. However I don`t want do that , in certain cases only I want change at IBD level which should reflect in MD04. Is there a way to achieve this ?
Thanks in advance

Changes in server side java file not reflecting in Client side java code?

Hi friends,
iam using eclipse IDE, JBoss server, SWING GUI and Oracle DB
( looks like : SWINGGUI (Client) <--> EJB's (serverside) <---oracle )
my problem is , when i make change in server side bean file, that changes are not reflecting in GUI programs.
(for ex: iam adding settr and getter for a field and using that in GUI program. but its not identifying that setter or getter).
please tell me what should i do for every change done to server side program, that should reflect / available to GUI?

my problem is , when i make change in server side bean file, that changes are not reflecting in GUI programs.
(for ex: iam adding settr and getter for a field and using that in GUI program. but its not identifying that setter or getter).what do you mean it's not "identifying" the methods?
you have to call those methods you know
are you getting NoSuchMethodError?
please tell me what should i do for every change done to server side program, that should reflect / available to GUI?you haven't posted any code or error messages that might help us debug

GR time not taken in MD04

Hello Everyone,
In my project an enhancement been done for running Route Determination at the time of PO save. In order to update GR time in MD04, I am updating field TERMN in EKET table at the time of PO save that finally reflect in MD04 when MRP is run on that material. But the problem is when this is not happening in one PO, It updated TERMN at PO schedule line level but when MRP is run it shows delivery date without considering GR processing time.
is there any condition when GR time not considered when Route is run.
Is there something i need to check to find the cause.
Thanks
Sunil

Answered

AR Down Payment Invoice Does Not Reflect in BP Master Data...

We have placed a sales order for a BP.
We select payment means and accept the payment
In the background a AP Down Payment Invoice is created
When we view the BP master data - the account ballance window does NOT reflect this "down payment"
If we select the golden arrow at account ballance, uncheck "reconciled transactions" you can see the payment and AP down payment and they clear each other out.
The problem is that when the final invoice is created it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. Even if you are simply working at the BP master data window, it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. I belive our process is correct because If you click the TDP box, the payment is listed and will be applied to the final invoice.
It simply does not alert the user that a payment had been received.
What are we doing wrong?????\
Thank you!
Edited by: Andrew Bleier on Feb 4, 2009 1:27 AM

Keith Taylor
You are right this feature is only available in Version 2007A. There account posting happen purely due to the pay SAP has been designed and the configuration of GL Accounts.
To make fundametal change to the core product is very difficult if you explain me your business process exactly as you do, I could think of alternatives.
Please let know.
Suda

Check Box values not reflecting in the pageflow instace variable

Hello BEA Experts,
I am binding a checkBox group to an instance variable of a Pageflow , it seems that the array inside the pageflow is null no matter what can you please let me know why.
Is it possible to bind the checkbox group tag to an array in Pageflow or is there anything wrong with the way I am using the checkbox group with in a data- repeater table.
Here are the code snippets..
JSP:
<netui-data:repeaterItem>
<tr class="tablebody">
<td>
<netui:checkBoxGroup dataSource="{pageFlow.nodeIds}">
<netui:checkBoxOption value="{container.item.nodeId}">&nbsp
</netui:checkBoxOption>
</netui:checkBoxGroup>
Contoller:
Has a private instance varible named nodeIds with getter and setter methods..
Please let me know why the checked values are not reflecting in the pageFlow attribute.

Hi Bob
I didn't understand fully what you are trying here. Could you please clarify?
I assume that you have a Array of NodeId objects.
Lets say:
Public NodeId[] nodeids = new NodeIds[10];
and you want a checkBoxGroup mapped to NodeId[]
and have as many checkBoxOption as number of elements in array with value as NodeId(i).nodeId
Is this assumption correct?
If the above is correct then the code snippet you have pasted is wrong in the sense that checkBoxGroup datasource is the array but the Option value is the main repeater item's nodeId which is wrong.
The container.item would not access anything within the pageflow variable.
I will post a sample in the next one
Vimala-

BPM 11g Role Assignment not Reflected on BPM Workspace

Hi,
I'm having trouble with role maping in JDeveloper for my BPM 11g project, where the server groups mapped against a particular applcation role is not reflected in BPM workspace.
I'm mapping application roles with server groups in the Organization section of my BPM project in JDeveloper, but when I open the Administration section of the BPM workspace, I see that the appropriate section is blank where there should be the server group assigned.
I have confirmed that the server groups are in place, and have users associated with them. I even tried ti with the Administrators groups of WebLogic, with the same results.
However, when I deployed this same project on an Oracle On Demand server, the JDeveloper role maapping was successfully deployed along with my process. Could anyone please provide some insight in this matter?
I'm working on JDeveloper and SOA 11.1.1.5
Thanks,
Debojit

HI,
In 11g you have the concept of Global Links. You can refer to http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/user.1111/e15175/bpmug_ext_apps.htm#BACCACGI fro example of how this can be acheived
I think there are also some samples on java.net for Oracle BPM Suite however this appears to be down at the time of posting so I can not validate this.
Hope this helps
Regards Dave

LPA changes are not reflected fully in 2LIS_02_SCL

The changes done to scheduling agreement, schedule lines are not reflecting in 2LIS_02_SCL, and there by resulting errors in delta update in BI system.
For example
     LPA     RM     SCL     Quantity                                    (2LIS_02_SCL)
ODS(A)      3001             15          800
ODS(C)     3001     X     15          300
     3001          15          800
PSA      3001     X     15          400
        3001             15          900
As we are using the Update type Addition,
From PSA, it is clear that the change is 500; this change got reflected in ODS properly.
But when I compare ODS data with EKET data,
LPA     SCL     ODS(Active)          EKET
3001     15     800               900
As you can see wrong validation results between BI & R3
I am missing the below changes happened to SCL in the extractor
     3001     X     15          300
     3001          15          400
The missing above entry is resulting errors.
Does anybody know how the EKET line changes can be tracked?
How to check the V3 Update, we checked the program: RMBWV302
Does anybody have idea where to track this error.
Note: the above case is happening to only a for few documents
Regards,
NK.A
Message was edited by:
        nandakumar a

Hi Renjith,
Thanks for the reply. Can you please let me know few more answers to the below points.
As the datasource 2LIS_02_SCL does not takes this event into account (only MA, MB, MC and MD), this field is not passed to BW (you can see the events per datasource in transaction LBWE)
You are referring to posting of the Material Ledger posting right ? Can you please give some more information about MA MB MC MD as I have verified in LBWE and could not find anything about it except that its picking that GLMNG value from MCEKET table.
Renjith, Please update your views on the below query. I am not able to get any answers from anyone on this query. I appreciate your reply.
In my opinion you would be able to fill it in the customer-exit of LIS (EXIT_SAPLEINS_001) or BW (EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001)
If I add a zfield to the SCL DS and then populate that field with the code in the include ZXRSAU01 , EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 in that going to help.
Do I have to verify the events MA MB MC and MD while populating this zfield or I can just do a direct lookup on EKET
select single * from EKET
where EBELN = l_MC02M_0SCL-EBELN
and EBELP = l_MC02M_0SCL-EBELP
and ETENR = l_MC02M_0SCL-ETENR will do ?
So when ever the ds fields are getting populated in the org DS ...it will find this zfield in the same structure and will fill this field. Is that going to fix it ? I have also found couple of SAP Notes on the same issue and do you think implementing those notes will fix the problem without the zfield or code.
Could you please check out these notes 100690 and 431145. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Daniel

REM MFBF Scrap posting not reflecting in MD04

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for