Removing single core processor

Hi,
I just recently bought an early 2006 Mac Mini. I've ordered a newer duo core processor and additional ram. Looking at the processor, I'm not sure how to remove it. There's no lever or locking mechinism that I can see. Any help would be appreciated. Here's the pic:

Based on your photos your model is not upgradeable. This is the upgradable one.
https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Mac+mini+Model+A1176+Core+2+Duo+Processor+Replaceme nt/1178

Similar Messages

CS4 and single core processors

Hi,
I have a Mac Mini with a 1.5 GHz Intel single core processor and i want to buy Creative Suite 4 Web Standard to use on it.
But when i read the requirements for CS4 it mentions that a Mac should have the following:
PowerPC G4 or G5 or multicore Intel processor
Does CS4 work OK on a Intel single core processor?
Is a multicore processor specified because a small number of features benefit from it?
Any advice would be appreciated.

I used InDesign CS4 for a while on a 1 Gig 800MHz G4 tiBook. It was reasonably satisfactory given that I knew I was working in an underpowered setup -- I've since replaced the tiBook with a MacBook Pro with 4 Gigs.
I think that if you stick to your "one app at a time" philosophy, you'll be happy enough with the Mac Mini. I think Adobe was just reducing the testing and support load it had to deal with by apparently excluding older processors.
Dave

Testing single core / processor in Java

Hi all,
I delevoped multi-threaded application and I would like to test it on:
- machine with 2-cored processor
- machine with 2 processors
Is there possibility to push JVM to use only one core / one processor of hosting machine ? Just for comparision of efficiency ?
Regards,
Maciej

There isn't anything in the API for this. Probably the best thing is to disable or take all but one CPU offline and then run the java application. One way to do this on Windows is to add the /NUMPROC switch to boot.ini (not sure if you can do this dynamically). On Solaris the prsadm command can be used to take CPUs offline. There are probably many ways on Linux - one way is the maxcpus paramter to the kernel line in grub.conf. Hope this helps.

Processor question - Dual core vs. single core.

I currently have an Aspire 6930 laptop that I bought about a year ago on clearance from Best Buy. I'm quite happy with it. It has an Intel Core 2 Duo processor (2.0 GHZ, 800MHz, FSB, 2 MB L2 cache), 3 GB DDR2, 320 GB HDD if that means anything. I'm not a computer geek so really don't know much about this stuff.
Our old laptop is a modular laptop (about 4 years old) which my husband is using (I won't let him mess with my Aspire - long story) and it's pretty much falling apart. None of the USB ports work, the CD/DVD RW is broken, one of the hinges is busted so it won't close properly and it runs slower than a snails pace as he's dowloaded any and all "speed up your PC" and "diagnose your PC" programs from the web - if it's on the web it must be true, right???? Anyway, I've taken pity on him and have decided to try to buy him a new laptop as a combination 10 year anniversary/42nd birthday/Christmas present. Money is a HUGE issue as I'm a SAHM and have been pinching pennies and clipping coupons from the grocery money to try to come up with some funds for this surprise. I'd like to stay around $400.
I've found this one at Best Buy and it has good reviews.... http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Acer+-+Aspire+Laptop+with+AMD+Athlon%26%23153%3B+Single-Core+Processor/9...
But it says it has a single core processor. What exactly is the difference with single core vs. duo core???
We are not gamers. DH basically uses the computer to surf the web, watch Youtube video's, upload and download photo's, burn DVD's, etc. He does talk with family overseas so I would need/like to add a webcam.
I was also looking at this Asus model... http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Asus+-+Laptop+with+Intel%26%23174%3B+Pentium%26%23174%3B+Processor+-+Mid...
But the Asus has a Pentium processor which I've heard isn't the best???? Also, it's over $150 more. Is the duo processor and increase processor speed (1.6GHz vs 2.1 GHz) really going to increase the speed/response time significantly for what we do on the computer?? An extra $150 is going to be really tough for me to come up with but if it will truly make a significant difference I will try to find it somewhere.
Your thoughts/recommendations would be appreciated.
hugs -
lisa

Thanks for the input. We really don't have the space for a desktop which is why the laptop worked so well for us. The only place to put a desktop is on the kitchen table and then we are always taking it apart when family come for dinner (which is often). I thought of netbook, but it does seem so limited. My husband is an amateur photographer and I would like the larger screen so that if he decides to persue this he would be able to do some basic photo editing, etc.
I think I will go with the dual core processer. BB has an HP that is $429
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/HP+-+Laptop+with+Intel%26%23174%3B+Pentium%26%23174%3B+Processor+-+Black...
and then another HP that is $499
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/HP+-+Laptop+with+Intel%26%23174%3B+Pentium%26%23174%3B+Processor+-+Piano...
and I can't seem to find the difference?????? Except the cheaper on has more RAM??? Doesn't seem to make sense.
Thoughts on the HP???
hugs -
lisa

HP 4510S laptop. has dual core processor but is only running one half of it.

This system is running on Win 7 32bit. If I upgraded to W7-64 bit would the system then use both halves of the processor?

I use BELARC advisor which lists all hardware, SW on my system. It also tells me what processors I have, memory, etc. It will also tell me if I have a dual or single core processor and whether it is running both cores or only one. My gateway NV50 is running Win 7-64 bit and BELARC tells me how it is working on both cores. But my wifes LT which is an HP has win 7-32 bit for an OS and Belarc advises that it is only running one core. That is why I asked the question. I am upgrading the HD from 250 to 750 gb and maxing out her memory. Maybe then she will quit complaining about how slow it works.

Will Illustrator run on 1.8GHz quad core processor?

I am reading that Illustrator CS4 requires a 2.0GHz processor to run. I am assuming that is for a single core processor. I am considering buying a new computer running Vista 64 bit with a1.8GHz quad core processor and 4GB of RAM. Would Illustrator CS4 run ok on such a system?
Thanks,
Bob

I think 1400 by 900 is good since you can run many of the motion graphic programs on such a monitor.
1920 x 1200 is very good but now things have gotten to the point that they have higher resolution available.
So I recommend the highest you need. The reason i say this is that once applications are made multi core worthy and go 64 bit it requires more resources but it will perform better and what I mean by better is not necessarily speed on any one task but the it will offer functions that are not possible on the current cpus with the current application.
It just seems to me you need a little more then what you are getting, a little more so that in the very near future you will not have to upgrade again causing you to end up paying even more that you thought you were saving.
If you understand my logic.
Though the answer to your original question is it can probably run, how well you would probably have to tell us after you get it.

What Do Multi-Core Processors Do?

I posted a thread on this some time ago, and my understanding was that a multi-core processor allowed for computing tasks be performed simultaneously. Rather than one after another, which is what a single-core processor would do. This is often applied within the applications themselves, to increase execution speed. Such applications being multi-threaded applications.
But I've recently learnt that even single core processors can execute code in more than one thread. So in this sense, what extra functionality does having multiple cores give you? Or am I wrong in thinking that single core processors can do this too? I'm trying to weigh up the advantages of buying a Mac Pro over a different model like an iMac.
There's a hole in my understanding somewhere, I just don't know where it is.
Any info appreciated.
Many thanks,
Adam

multi-threading varies by application
Think of the system having reserved rights to 0, some background task(s) to 1, Safari on 2, etc. is one scenerio.
Some but not all or even a lot of apps are truly multi-thread.
Faster processor cores are still more important than how many cores.
one core with hyper-threading can execute two threads, and deliver 20-35% more in performance at the expense of running hotter and using more watts. HT came back in 2009 with Nehalem and Core i-Series.
Dual processor, two cpus, have been around for a long time on Macs back to G4/500DP and dual and quad-core is just more efficient to manufacture and build into systems (dual core Atom or A8's in mobile devices).
Programs that worked without HT sometimes don't work properly with H-T until they are recompiled and optimized properly.
Your real question is what Mac to buy though, and what you actually plan to run and do.
And there are processors for laptops, desktop, towers and more. And all have different performance.
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/processors/index.htm
http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html
Some iMac vs Mac Pro
http://www.barefeats.com/imac10o.html
http://www.barefeats.com/imac10v.html
So getting things to work in multi-core, multi-threaded, how much memory you want, the need for multiple drives (SSD boot drive and 1TB data drive even in iMac now), and graphic offerings.
Start with what you use, then to what you need to buy. Don't put the cart before the horse. A Mac Pro or iMac may seem at first to be on somewhat equal footing.
http://www.barefeats.com/wst10c2.html
There is a huge range in performance on MacBook/Air/Pro platform.
http://www.barefeats.com/mbpp31.html

Public static Thread currentThread() and multi core processors??

Hello,
I have the following basic question: what does public static Thread currentThread() mean in the context of multi core processors where several threads may execute concurrently?
Any clue welcome,
J.

Hi balteo,
When you invoke Thread.currentThread(), you get the reference of the current thread : the thread where you make the call.
Just try :
System.out.println("My program is running thread : " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
mean in the context of multi core processors where several threads may execute concurrently?Several threads may run concurrently with single core processors. The number of concurrent threads you may execute depends of the processors architecture and the OS.

Power Mac MDD G4 1.25 Single Core vs. Dual Core

I am purchasing a 1.25 MDD G4 that has the single core processor. I am going to be using it for music recording and creation.
Am I going to wish I had the dual core? Or will I not notice the difference? I was previously using a 700mhz imac with 765mb of ram and overloaded it pretty quickly.
This machine, with 1 (which is has) or 2 (which I might install) gigs of ram should outshine that pretty significantly even with a single core shouldn't it?

Dual if you can, especially if you're looking to go to Leopard during the life of the machine. Single G4 CPU and Leopard is painfully slow, even at 1.67GHz.
Even the current entry level iMac blows away most of the G5's, except maybe the quad cores) so G5's should be reasonably priced.

What the heck is Single Core, Dual Core, and Quad Core Processor Configurat

I am listing an eMac computer on ebay. I have all the information necessary except processor configuration. Do eMacs come with Single, Dual, or Quad processor configurations? Or does it vary? I don't even know what those are really.

Make sure to follow these steps when selling*:
http://www.macmaps.com/selling.html
As was already indicated all eMacs were single core.
Apple didn't start releasing multicore machines until the later G5s.
- * Links to my pages may give me compensation.

Unable to capture data from Serial port using LVRT2010 in single core pentium 4 machine

I am using application written in Labview using windows Labview
Runtime environment 2010. Application creates a tunnel to intercept data from
Serial port.
My problem is, Currently, I am using single core Pentium
processor. When I am trying to intercept the data between COM1 and COM7 (COM 7
is a virtual port) it is not able to capture data.
When I am running Labview RT environment using dual core
processor machine it is running normally. I wonder whether it could be the compatibility issues with
single core Pentium processor.

Hi Magnetica
Are both of the machines running the same runtime engine,
drivers ect?
Have you had RT applications running on this
machine before?
Is the development computer a 64bit machine?
The processor is a supported model (See link below).
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/8239
Regards
Robert
National Instruments UK & Ireland

Extract report only runs on a single core

I am running the following extract report on a dual quad-core processor server with 32 GB ram and when I suppress empty rows the process runs on a single core which of course runs at 100% slowing down the process, but if I do not sppress rows all cores are used. Has anyone else experienced this or can i modify my report to improve performace?
<PAGE ("Years")
FY06
<COLUMN ("Time Periods")
{SUPHEADING}
{Width 20}
<DIMBOTTOM "Time Periods"
<ROW ( "Market Segments","Object",Entities, Currencies,Years,Scenarios, Versions,HSP_Rates,Accounts,"Data Type")
{NAMEWIDTH 30}
{TABDELIMIT}
{ ROWREPEAT}
{MISSINTTEXT "0"}
{SUPMISSINGROWS}
{ NOINDENTGEN }
{ SUPCOMMAS }
{ decimal 4 }
<DIMBOTTOM "Market Segments"
<DIMBOTTOM "Object"
<DIMBOTTOM "Total Company (Mgmt)"
Local JPY USD CNY GBP
<DIMBOTTOM "Scenarios"
<DIMBOTTOM "Versions"
<DIMBOTTOM "HSP_Rates"
<DIMBOTTOM Accounts
<DIMBOTTOM "Data Type"
!

One item unrelated to the DimBot issue:
If you have a time period that can be used to restrict on (for suppression), you can use the restrict approach rather than the sup missing, ala:
<RESTRICT (@DataCol(11) <> #Missing )
I'm not sure I would attempt this if you had to deal with multiple restrict's though -- I'm also not entirely convinced the savings would be substantial, but it could be based on the multiple core aspects.

Adobe Media Encoder only using single core of CPU (core parking has already been disabled and did not solve the problem)

I only edit videos every few months and the last time I edited a video was around 6-9 months ago. At that time, I noticed AME was only using a single core of the CPU and contacted Adobe who instructed me to disable core parking, which worked. After disabling core parking AME used 100% of all 12 logical cores to process the video and all was good. Then last week, I decided to edit another video and noticed AME was very slow and checked and it was again only using a single core to process the video, but core parking is still turned off. By slow I mean that a 10 minute video with the lens distortion correction preset and one video transition effect is estimated to take nearly 3 hours to complete. For comparison, the GoPro software processed the same clip with the same effects in 20 minutes. Also, through troubleshooting with Adobe over the last few days, I have also tried downloading previous versions of the software but the prior versions have the same issue.
The video I'm trying to edit was shot on a GoPro Hero 4 Black with 1080p Wide at 60 frames per second. The default video format for GoPro is .mp4. The output settings I'm using when I export from Premiere Pro to AME are H.264 with the YouTube 1080p HD.
My system:
ASUSSabertooth X79
Intel core i7 4930k (6 physical cores, 12 logical cores)
16GB DDR3 Quad channel RAM
Samsung 830 SSD 128GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 (not CUDA compatible, I know)
Please ask if you need any additional information to help solve this problem.

This has been driving me CRAZY... so going over the message boards from 2 to 5 am this morning I found the best explanation I have seen. The problem is that Adobe Creative Cloud is NOT "Processor Group Aware". Windows parses any more than 36 cores into "Processor Groups" and while the Pro version of Windows 7 & 8 can handle 256 threads they have to spread them across multiple processor groups.
Simple Version: AREA | How many cores does 3ds Max support?
Microsoft's Explanation: Processor Groups (Windows)
Clearly, this is an Adobe Problem... If any engineers are reading this PLEASE review the below and incorporate it into your next build of Creative Cloud!!!
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn653313%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Again, I bought a VERY expensive machine based on your white paper that recommended Dual Xeon Workstations. Please, Please Give us the product you PROMISED!!!
Michael

Labview 7.1 and Dual Core Processors

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has encountered any problems using Labview
7.1 and the newer dual-core processors. I have a Dell Dimension DXPO51,
2.8 GHz Pentium D with 1 GB ram. There is NO virus software or any
other non-essential programs running in the background. The computer is
totally dedicated to controlling a machine.
Other NI boards installed: PCI-6221 for analog inputs, PCI-6602 for
reading encoders, PCI-7352 Motion Control board to control 2 motors.
The problem:
Periodically when I start my program, it locks up and I get the "Tell
Microsoft about this problem..." screen. After it exits out of Labview
and I restart, the Run arrow is not broken but the program will not run
until I make a change on the block diagram. Then I can run again.
Doesn't happen all the time, doesn't happen after running after a
certain amount of time, doesn't happen after a particular change is
made (i.e. adding case statements, adding an event, etc.). In other
words, totally random.
I have tried totally uninstalling ALL National Instruments software,
including cleaning the registry, and re-installing everything. Didn't
help.
The machine will be shipping with the executable file only but I'm still leary of problems arising due to this issue.
Any help or suggestions of things to try would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Teri

Hi Teri,
I've seen scattered reports of users having trouble with dual-processor
machines with earlier versions of LabVIEW, though I'm not aware of
verified solutions in those cases. The dual-processor operation
should be completely transparent to LabVIEW, although I know XP has had
some difficulties in providing the abstraction correctly. A
workaround that has been successful in the past is to set the processor
affinity for LabVIEW to a single processor. This should eliminate
the dual-processor nature of the system from consideration. If
the problem still recurs after that, then the issue stems from another
source and we can investigate further. Does it show this behavior
with any program (or just by opening the LabVIEW environment)?
How often does this occur (10%, 50% of the time)?
Cheers,
Matt Pollock
National Instruments

2.7ghz Dual Core verses Single Core

Hi, I have a Pro Tools system with PCI audio cards that I sunk quite a bit of money into. Needless to say, I'm stuck in PowerMac purgatory until I come up with the cash to make a total PCIe conversion. With that being said, I am now trying to determine what the absolute fastest (dare I say the best) PowerMac was before Apple moved on to greener pastures. What I've been able to find with some light research is that they built the obvious 2.7ghz Dual Core machine but also momentarily built a 2.7ghz Single Core machine for some reason. Can anyone shed some light on the advantages/disadvantages between the two? Thanks!

You have received misinformation. The dual processor (not dual-core) model was the only one offered. Only the 1.6 GHz and 1.8 GHz machines were ever offered with a single-processor.
All G5s at 2.5 GHz and above were also liquid cooled, so you may want to take that into account. Should one of them develop a leak, the repair bill is astronomical, assuming you can't coax Apple into fixing it as a design defect.

Removing single core processor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for