Renaming existing VLANs in UCS Manager

Hi guys
I would like to find out the possibility of renaming existing VLANs in UCS Manager 2.1.3b or a link where I can get the info or how to do doc best practices.
Thanks a million,
Ziccho_Virt

Hello,
This feature is not available any of the UCS releases at this time. A workaround if you
need to make the name change to your existing VLAN, would be to create a new VLAN with the
name you would prefer and with the same VLAN ID. Then apply this VLAN (with the new name)
to the interfaces as needed (vNICs and Ethernet uplinks). Once you are certain that you
have added the "new" VLAN to all interfaces as needed, you may remove the original VLAN
from each interface. Once the original VLAN is removed from the interfaces, you can then
delete it from the LAN tab altogether.
Please note that the above is an unofficial workaround.
There is an enhancement logged for this behavior. You can follow it's status using this link:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCui83127
Regards,
-Gabriel

Similar Messages

Cisco UCS Manager not discovering C240 server

Hello, Cisco community!
Currenlty UCS manager shows two Fabric Interconnects, and two Fabric Extenders, but for some reason my server isn't showing up
Here is the birds eye view:
I have my C240 connected with two 10GbE twinax cables, each going to one fabric extender. (2 FEX total)
I have two 10GbE twinax cables connected from the fiber module of each FEX to each Fabric interconnects. (2 FI total)
The fabric interconnect ports L1 and L2 ports are connected to their corresponding ports. So their connected to each other.
I run 'show cluster extended-state' on the primary FI and this is what i get:
FI-A# show cluster extended-state
Cluster Id: 0xebaad0e28ded11e3-0x86d4002a6a153d84
Start time: Wed Feb 5 16:07:44 2014
Last election time: Wed Feb 5 16:23:26 2014
A: UP, PRIMARY
B: UP, SUBORDINATE
A: memb state UP, lead state PRIMARY, mgmt services state: UP
B: memb state UP, lead state SUBORDINATE, mgmt services state: UP
heartbeat state PRIMARY_OK
INTERNAL NETWORK INTERFACES:
eth1, UP
eth2, UP
HA NOT READY
No device connected to this Fabric Interconnect
After configuring the server-side ports on each FI, the server still doesn't show up
Any idea are highly appreciated!!
-Alex

It's good to know that the Fabric Interconnects don't need upstream connectivity, so we can scratch that from our list of possible issues.
For clarity, here are the important firware versions:
CMIC - 1.5(3), cisco recommends a minimum of 1.4(6)
BIOS - 1.5.1c, cisco recommends a minumum of 1.4.7a
vNIC - 2.1(1c), cisco recommends a minumum of 2.1(0.367e)
So, we can cross out firware mis-matches from the list.
wdey,
I tried going trough UCS Manager and looking where i could configure the out-of-band IP management pool, but I can't find the right place to do that. Here is a screen shot of the VLAN tab of my UCS Manager.
Could you eleborate more on the process of how to do this? This might fix the issue.
Also, I noticed that in the BIOs setting screen, under Advanced -> LOM and PCIe Slots configuration -> PCIe Slot ID: 2(VIC 1225) it says Option ROM Status Not Loaded. Do you think this might have something to do with server discovery?
Thanks alot for the help guys It's really much apprecaited.
-Alex

Nexus 1000v UCS Manager M81KR

Hello everyone
I am confused about how works the integration between N1K and UCS Manager:
First question:
If two VMs on different ESXi and different VEM but in the same VLAN,would like to talk each other, the data flow between them is managed from the upstream switch( in this case UCS Fabric Inteconnect), isn'it?
I created a Ethernet uplink port-profile on N1K in switch port mode access(100), I created a vEthernet port-profile for the VM in switchport mode access(100) as well. In the Fabric Interconnect I created a vNIC profile for the physical NICs of ESXi(where there are the VMs). Also I created the vlan 100(the same in N1K)
Second question: With the configuration above, if I include in the vNIC profile the vlan 100 (not as native vlan) only, the two VMs can not ping each other. Instead if I include in the vNIC profile only the defaul vlan(I think it is the vlan 1) as native vlan evereything works fine. WHY????
Third question: How it works the tagging vlan on Fabric interconnectr and also in N1K.
I tried to read differnt documents, but I did not understand.
Thanks

Since you have defined switchport mode access vlan 100 on uplink port-profile of Nexus 1000v, it sends all ethernet frames untagged(without 802.1q tag).
When you include in the vNIC profile the vlan 100 (not as native vlan) ONLY like below screenshot, untagged frames are dropped because UCS expects all frames received on this port as tagged frames.
When you change vNIC template to include default vlan as native vlan ONLY like below screen shot, you basically bridge two vlans (vlan 100 and vlan 1) because UCS FI now puts all untagged frames in vlan 1. and sends untagged frames to other ESXi host and ESXi host again bridge vlan 1 to vlan 100 with switchport mode access vlan 100 on uplink port profile.

Nexus 1000v UCS Manager and Cisco UCS M81KR

Hello everyone
I am confused about how works the integration between N1K and UCS Manager:
First question:
If two VMs on different ESXi and different VEM but in the same VLAN,would like to talk each other, the data flow between them is managed from the upstream switch( in this case UCS Fabric Inteconnect), isn'it?
I created a Ethernet uplink port-profile on N1K in switch port mode access(100), I created a vEthernet port-profile for the VM in switchport mode access(100) as well. In the Fabric Interconnect I created a vNIC profile for the physical NICs of ESXi(where there are the VMs). Also I created the vlan 100(the same in N1K)
Second question: With the configuration above, if I include in the vNIC profile the vlan 100 (not as native vlan) only, the two VMs can not ping each other. Instead if I include in the vNIC profile only the defaul vlan(I think it is the vlan 1) as native vlan evereything works fine. WHY????
Third question: How it works the tagging vlan on Fabric interconnectr and also in N1K.
I tried to read differnt documents, but I did not understand.
Thanks

This document may help...
Best Practices in Deploying Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches on Cisco UCS B and C Series Cisco UCS Manager Servers
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/white_paper_c11-558242.html
If two VMs on different ESXi and different VEM but in the same VLAN,would like to talk each other, the data flow between them is managed from the upstream switch( in this case UCS Fabric Inteconnect), isn'it?
-Yes. Each ESX host with the VEM will have one or more dedicated NICs for the VEMs to communicate with the upstream network. These would be your 'type ethernet' port-profiles. The ustream network would need to bridge the vlan between the two physicall nics.
Second question: With the configuration above, if I include in the vNIC profile the vlan 100 (not as native vlan) only, the two VMs can not ping each other. Instead if I include in the vNIC profile only the defaul vlan(I think it is the vlan 1) as native vlan evereything works fine. WHY????
- The N1K port profiles are switchport access making them untagged. This would be the native vlan in ucs. If there is no native vlan in the UCS configuration, we do not have the upstream networking bridging the vlan.
Third question: How it works the tagging vlan on Fabric interconnectr and also in N1K.
- All ports on the UCS are effectively trunks and you can define what vlans are allowed on the trunk as well as what vlan is passed natively or untagged. In N1K, you will want to leave your vEthernet port profiles as 'switchport mode access'. For your Ethernet profiles, you will want them to be 'switchport mode trunk'. Use an used used vlan as the native vlan. All production vlans will be passed from N1K to UCS as tagged vlans.
Thank You,
Dan Laden
PDI Helpdesk
http://www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Unified Communications on UCS C-Series through 6140 UCS Manager

I have a customer that has decided to provision their UCS C-210M2 using a PALO card to an existing 6140. They intend on using UCS Manager to provision the server and serve network connectivity. This is supported right up until the Unified Communications comes into the mix. UC requires two RAID arrays, RAID 1 (2 Disks) for VMware and RAID 5 (8 Disks) Virtual Machines. UCS Manager does not allow more than 1 RAID type per service profile. How do we make this work in a supported model?

UCS Manager is not able to provision the RAID arrays (Feature request - PLEASE). Cisco UC BU has the TRC#1-3 yet is flexible.
Two solutions are as follows:
1. DAS - Use CIMC to configure the RAID arrays (2 disks RAID1) for VMware + (8 disks RAID5). Create a service profile in UCS Manager that specifies that the Service Profile will not apply any local disk policies.
2. Diskless - Qualify the SAN environment, provision C210M2 using TRC#3 specs. Build service profile in UCS Manager as needed.

How to move a standalone Cisco C series to UCS managed service profile without losing data?

Hi,
We currently have a standalone cisco C series server with Windows 2012 installed on the local disks. We need to move this server to Cisco UCS managed with a service profile but cannot lose the existing data and OS boot method.
Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks

Hi Adrian,
To be able to accomplish this set the local disk policy to "Any Configuration" this way UCSM won't overwrite the current raid configuration on the server.
See link below
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2-1/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_1/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_1_chapter_011110.html#task_897FABF194524BDF8C0EF72E755972F0
Let it me know if this helps

UCS Manager and C Series questions

My reading of the documentation is that in order to use the UCS Manager with a standalone C series server (C200, C210 or C250, anyway) is that in addition to UCSM 1.4 and a pair of 6108 fabric interconnects you also need a pair of 2248 fabric extenders.
First, is Cisco planning to add support for additional fabric extenders? I have a customer with a pair of 2232's who is looking at adding some standalone C series servers to be managed along with an existing B series chassis.
Second, I'd read on this forum that the Palo card may not be supported on M1 servers. Is it safe to assume that the Palo card is supported on M2 servers?
Thanks!

Michael,
Correct, for the current revision of UCSM (1.4) you require two 2248's for Management traffic (CIMC) while your two 10G connection for the dataplane will connect direclty to each Fabric Interconnect. Future planning is going to have a single I/O path and remove the need for the additional 2248's. Future support for 2232 (10G FEX) will also be added to increase port density on the Interconnects.
Palo may "work" with M1 servers, but is only "supported" on M2.
Regards,
Robert

UCS Manager Update from 2.1(1a) / 2.1(1b) to full 2.1(3b) cause Policy Reference Error on iSCSI

Hello,
I actualy did a UCS firmware upgrade from a mixed 2.1(1a) and 2.1(1b) to a full 2.1(3a) version.
Chassis are 2208XP, Fabrics are 6248UP and blades are all B200-M3.
I use firmware policy to update the firmware on the blades.
Here are the current version of the different componments:
- CIMC, Adapterers and BIOS Server: 2.1(3b)
- UCS Software: 2.1(3b)
- IO Modules: 2.1(1b)
- Fabric Kernel / System : 2.1(1b)
After UCS Software update when I connect on UCS Manager I got several warning referencing the error "Policy reference autProfileName does not resolve to named policy" on different parts.
I have follow some post to resolve some of them:
- iSCSI nic is created without Authentication profile issues:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCui43905
- Default SOL policy issue:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtl88314
This resolve a lot of error but I'm still having errors like this on all my iscsi NIC:
Causing this:
Right now the update of the IOMs and FIs are on standby until I resolve this.
Can I have some help please.

It looks like you are hitting:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCui43905
Symptom:
Warning with the text "Policy reference authProfileName does not resolve to named policy" is seen when creating an iSCSI nic on a service profile.
Conditions:
Issue happens only when iSCSI nic is created without an Authentication profile
Workaround:
Use Authentication profile
Create a Default Authentication Profile
Existing warnings from the previous version would still exist even after the upgrade and that can be isolated only using the above work around. If new service profiles are created on the 2.2.1b version will not experience this issue.
Here is how to create an authentication profile:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.1/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_1_chapter_011111.html#task_5DBBCD17FFA046A395B4493104838B1F

Monitoring Cisco UCS Manager via HP System Information Manager 7.1 (SIM)

I am working with a customer to configure HP System Information Manager 7.1 (SIM) to monitor their Cisco UCS Manager.
The customer is looking to monitor the following:
- CPU Utilization on manager, blades, servers, etc...
- Memory utilization
- Network utilization
- System inventory
Alerting is needed for the following:
- Hardware failures: memory, power supply, drive, etc...
- Predictive failures
- Alert messages
I have the list of all the MIBs provided by Cisco but an having the following issues while loading them into HP SIM.
While loading MIB "CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-TC-MIB" I get the following error message:
Line 128: Error defining object: expected a label, found reserved symbol {
Line in MIB: SYNTAX Gauge32 {
Guage32 is imported from SNMPv2-SMI MIB
To get past this error I found a version of the MIB that removes all the textual conventions that where causing errors. I have attached the fixed MIB file to this discussion. With the fixed version of the MIB installed in SIM everything compiles and installs except the following two MIBS. CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-NOTIFS-MIBCISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-CONFORM-MIB Questions:
1. Is there any way to get the CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-TC-MIB MIB to install correctly into HP SIM?
2. Is my MIB load order setup correctly?
3. Has anyone had success getting HP SIM to monitor and alert for Cisco UCS manager?
MIB Load Order:
SNMPv2-SMI
SNMPv2-TC
SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB
RFC1213-MIB
IF-MIB
CISCO-SMI
CISCO-ST-TC
ENTITY-MIB
INET-ADDRESS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-TC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-FAULT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-NOTIFS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-AAA-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-ADAPTOR-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-BIOS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-BMC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-CALLHOME-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-CAPABILITY-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-COMM-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-COMPUTE-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-CONFORM-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-DCX-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-DHCP-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-DIAG-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-DPSEC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-EPQOS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-EQUIPMENT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-ETHER-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-EVENT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-EXTMGMT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-EXTVMM-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-FABRIC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-FC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-FCPOOL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-FIRMWARE-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-FLOWCTRL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-HOSTIMG-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-IMGPROV-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-IMGSEC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-IPPOOL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-IQNPOOL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-ISCSI-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-LICENSE-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-LLDP-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-LSBOOT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-LSMAINT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-LS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-MACPOOL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-MAPPINGS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-MEMORY-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-MGMT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-NETWORK-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-NWCTRL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-ORG-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-OS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-PCI-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-PKI-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-PORT-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-POWER-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-PROCESSOR-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-PROC-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-QOSCLASS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-SOL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-STATS-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-STORAGE-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-SW-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-SYSDEBUG-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-SYSFILE-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-TOP-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-TRIG-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-UUIDPOOL-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-VM-MIB
CISCO-UNIFIED-COMPUTING-VNIC-MIB
References:
ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/supportlists/ucs/ucs-manager-supportlist.html#_Toc303691433
http://www.hp.com/wwsolutions/misc/hpsim-helpfiles/simsnmp.pdf

Please post "debug ccsip messages".
Based on your debug you are getting "Cause No. 38 - network out of order."
You may want to bind SIP to an interface that the IP address is defined which Lync points to.
Chris

Can't name new folders or rename existing folders in Finder

I can't name new folders or rename existing folders in Finder. I've never had this happen before. I tried both using the new folder icon and choosing "new folder" from the actions icon. The only unusual thing I'm doing now is working with Spaces enabled, but I can't imagine that this has anything to do with the problem. Selecting and hitting "return" doesn't allow me to either erase existing text or overwrite with new text. Any ideas?
Thanks.
Sue A.

Same here --
I just created a new folder and couldn't change its name. Finder would give me "more info" (permissions certainly not an issue) and allow me to delete (and then recreate) the folder, but not change its name.
Problem came from out of the blue, on a one-week-old system with all OS updates. Also found this old thread, which also suggests a Finder restart: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8989639
So that'll probably do it, but what gives?
Not so impressed with 10.5.7 so far... first a complete system crash while doing no more than downloading updates (a few hours after booting up for the first time), then networking stopped working (see http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2003868), now this...

Clearing UCS Manager fault about unused adapter uplink from C-series

I have a number of C240M3 servers in a UCS infrastructure. They all have two VIC 1225 adapters and when they were initially connected, the technicians accidentally connected the second adapter on some of them to the FEXs. For now at least, we only want the first adapters used (both ports - one to each FEX). However, since adapter 2 was connected at one point, UCS Manager won't stop giving these faults:
F0206 - Adapter 5/2 is unreachable
F0209 - Adapter uplink interface 5/2/1 link state: unavailable
It doesn't seem to have a way to clear the faults without reconnecting that second adapter. Re-acknowledging the server didn't help and I'm not sure I want to try decommissioning them and then getting them to appear in UCS again.
Does anyone know how to manually clear these faults?

Hi Kenny,
Correct; the second PCIe card is not connected to a FEX anymore. I tried reack'ing the FEXs but that didn't help, unfortunately. (If it helps, the fault appears in the individual servers' Faults tab - the FEXs don't show any faults.)

Using a RV180W to encrypt data passing thu an existing VLAN

Hi,
I have a customer with an existing VPN across 20 sites that has been implemented using ADSL lines and routers. The VPN is used to view confidential CCTV data. This VPN, which I will call the security VPN, must be upgraded to use the customer's existing IT network but must have its own security so that only authorised Security staff within the security VPN will have access to the equipment within the VPN. The existing security equipment will not be changed, but if necessary can be reconfigured. I have tried to setup the RV180W but I am doing something wrong and the RV180 is freezing. Each site has its own subnet, e.g. 10.0.x.0/255.255.255.0. The equipment at each site is setup to use the gateway 10.0.x.2. IT have provided each site with an access IP address of 10.0.x.3. What I am trying to do is to setup the RV180 with an address of 10.0.x.2 to act as a replacement gateway. This will encrypt the data and then send it 10.0.x.3. The IT internal network will then route the data to one of the other sites in our security VPN via its access IP address of 10.0.y.3 where the RV180 at this site will pick it up and route it within the target site. Any of the 20 security sites must be able to connect to any IP address at any of the other sites. The ADSL connections are obsolete and will be removed. The new infrastructure that IT will provide is based on VLANs. Is what I am trying to do possible using the RV180 and if so how should I configure the RV180 at each site? If someone can assist me it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your reply,
I have attached a drawing of what I need to achieve. I have omitted the old ADSL links that are now obsolete. My concern is: Is it possible, and how can I configure, a VPN or any other method of encryption over an existing VLAN or VPN whilst keeping the existing networking configurations at each site. This is required to ensure that the IT department cannot access or view sensitive security data (e.g CCTV and access profiles) that is moving between the remote sites and Central Security. The other challenge is that the Cisco router will be installed in the remote sites one at a time over 3 months. During this time sites must be able to operate with or without the upgraded security depending upon what has been installed.

Aaa ldap problem on UCS Manager

Hi all,
i'm working on UCS Manager Suite and i would like configure Authentication method using LDAP protocol ( AD : Windows 2008 R2 Standard Edition).
I follow this configuration guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/sample_configurations/UCSM_1_4_LDAP_with_AD/b_Sample_Configuration_LDAP_with_AD.pdf
but i obtained some message : authentication failed.
10.164.85.2 (UCS Manager)
10.164.85.21 (AD)
I have some doubt regarding "Non-Admin Bind User Account" : what are the privileges that it need?
In attach wireshark capture taken on AD Server.
Regards.
Dino

Hi Brian,
I deleted ldap provider profle and reconfigure new profile with same parameters and now it works.
I already use "aaa test server" command to verify authentication and it's works BUT if i checks output
scope security
scope ldap
show server
i obtained same output
DAP server:
    Hostname or IP address   DN to search and read    Port SSL Password
    10.164.85.21             CN=ucs binduser,OU=DDUsers,DC=didata-dc,DC=local
                                                      389   No
I expected **** under Password column.
Thank you for support.
Regards.
Dino

UCS Management Pack for System Center 2012 OpsMgr add monitor wizard error

We're successfully using the 2.6.0.179 version of the UCS Management Pack for System Center 2012 Operations Manager in our 2012 SP1 OpsMgr environment; however, in the new 2012 R2 OpsMgr environment we've stood-up and in which we installed the 2.6.2.0 version of the UCS MP, we're getting an error when trying to run the Add Monitoring Wizard under the Management Pack Templates node of the Authoring pane. We get the same error from the 2.6.1.0 version of the UCS MP as well. The text of the error is as follows:
"The page [Cisco.UCS.MP.UI.Proxy.Template.Page.ProxyDetailsPage] in the assembly [Cisco.UCS.MP.UI.Culture="",PublicKeyToken="6c96076cdf2c87a",Version="2.6.0.0"] could not be loaded. Please make sure that the account you are running under has sufficient privileges to load the given assembly, or the management pack that defines this page is installed or the assembly containing the page is in the path of the executible or that the page derives from known Operations Manager page type."
I'm an admin user in OpsMgr, so this should not be a user privilege issue, and that leaves the MP itself. The fact that a 2.6.0.0 version is mentioned makes me wonder if the base version of the MP must be installed before the 2.6.2 version. I'd test this, but we no longer have that version, and its no longer available for download from Cisco that I can see.
Has any dealt with this issue successfully, or have any insight into the problem?

Solved...the requirement is that you must do the MP configuration from the SCOM console on the SCOM Management Server where you installed the Cisco UCS MP; you can't do it from a SCOM console on a remote computer like I was trying to do.

Where to download VM-FEX software on UCS manager 2.1(1a)?

I'm looking for the .vib file to install it on the ESXi host.
On UCS manager 2.0, there use to be a link on the main page to download the file.
One 2.1(1a), it's not there.
Any idea where I can find it?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Thomas,
VNMC (Virtual Network Management Center) provides a centralized multi-device and policy management for virtual network services like Cisco vASA and VSG.
Please post your question on UCS support forum (https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/data-center/unified-computing) if you still have this question.
Thanks,
Ranga

Renaming existing VLANs in UCS Manager

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for