Render to YouTube

Almost all my projects, I upload dozens of works in progress for clients viewing in the private mode. for versions premire elements had a render and upload one step. Now Sony Vegas Pro has this feature. why do i need the speedbumps premire affords in uploading to youtube. If some want options, fine. but I want a quick freeway to the tube to approve changes. not to show off my compression prowess.And as the best settings change for youtube, adobe can silently adapt the expresslane settings. So why doesnt pp have it?

Valid Points all. But my main purpose would be to transmit privately works in progress to commercial clients. And many clients no use the platform embeded on their sites for video to save their sertvers bandwidth. as far as Anns anting to view the file before uploading, a good idea but time consuming. for me, the failure came with the you tube recompression, many of which fail anyway. so it wastes my time creating a good file, then have you tube mess it up. if watching the file on you tube and it looks ok, I send it to the client. very little of my youtube use is "public". I use it for what its not intended for, and dont really use it for social media. Ill take Johns suggestion and copy this message to the wish forum. Thanks and all the best Ann and John.
Steven

Similar Messages

  • Best Codec for Digital Hi8 SD Widescreen render to Youtube

    I shoot material on a Digital Hi8 camcorder in widescreen mode and can't seem to find a reasonable codec to render to for Youtube uploads that fill the screen.
    When I render at a 720x480 resolution and upload to Youtube I get letter and pillar boxing in the resulting Youtube. Many of my videos are over 10 or 15 minutes long and even though I have the ability to upload over 15 minute videos to my account, Elements will often give me a warning and not allow me to upload anything over 10 minutes long using the direct to Youtube "share" function.
    I've tried various .mpg and .wmv settings and have basically settled on 1280x720 as the rendered video resolution, but not only does this take a long time to render and upload as they become huge files at this resolution, but it also seems to be a waste and potential image degradation issue as it's blowing up the original video, but this is the only resolution it seems that fills up the Youtube window once uploaded.
    I also tend to try to up my audio codec too since a lot of my videos are music related and like to keep the audio quality up too.
    Any suggestions??

    Yes, Digital8 I guess would be the more accurate and correct term for the format... I do set my project settings for DV SD Widscreen which I assume is 720x480 and confirmed with the details of clips I import when I check them in Explorer.
    But when I render out to Windows Media (I've had problems rendering out as Quicktime before - fluttering of video, sync problems) so I've relied on mpg or windows media for the time being - when I render out as 720x480 and then upload to youtube, I get letterboxing and pillarboxing. Only when I expand the video to 1280x720 do I end up with a fully filled youtube viewing window. (And even then I am still getting a little black above and below the video)
    I can also improve the audio quality this way going with a windows 9.2 lossless codec which I like. Downside with all this is huge file sizes, long renders, and long upload times.
    I will try these settings that you provided, but won't 640x480 give me 4x3 squished video since my sources is 16x9??  Thanks for the help guys and community!
    From the Share tab,  choose Computer and then QuickTime/MOV.  Choose the DV preset and then click the Advanced button.
    From the settings window, do the following:
    Video Tab
    *Video Codec: H.264
    *Quality: 100
    *Frame Wdith: 640
    *Frame Height: 480
    *Frame Rate: 29.97
    *Field Type: Progressive
    *Pixel Aspect Ratio: square
    *Set Bitrate: checked
    *Bitrate: 8000 kbps
    Audio Tab
    *Audio Code: AAC
    *Output Channels: Stereo
    *Frequency: 44kHz

  • Safari unable to render some YouTube pages

    I have Safari 5.1.2. 
    Safari is suddenly unable to render some pages over at YouTube.  For example:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCBBv9LVGmc.  Safari seems to start loading the page, then starts all over, and then starts all over ... and then finally I get this message:  "Safari can't display this webpage.  Safari has repeatedly encountered an error ..."  I also get the same problem and message when I go to this page:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBrsM_WlfV8. 
    This does not happen with every YouTube page.  Just some. 
    I have closed and reopened Safari.  I have cleared the cache.  Same problem.  I have also uninstalled the Click to Flash extension.  Same problem.  Curiously, I do not have a problem with the page when I use my Camino browser. 
    Has anyone encountered this problem before?  Any solutions?
    TIA.

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a diagnostic test. It won’t solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    The purpose of this exercise is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account, or is system-wide. Enable guest logins and log in as Guest. For instructions, launch the System Preferences application, select “Help” from the menu bar, and enter “Set up a guest account” (without the quotes) in the search box.
    While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your personal files or settings. Any application you run will behave as if you were running it for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin.
    As Guest, launch the application(s) and test. Same problem(s)?
    After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it.

  • Premiere Elements 10 won't allow rendering long Youtube videos but Youtube will except them.

    Does anyone know how to disable the error that Premiere Elements gives you if you try to render a Youtube video longer than 10 or 15 minutes? My account on Youtube allows me to put up long videos (I currently have a 23 minute video I rendered with Pinnacle). I don't think it is the job of the software to stop you from doing something that is possible. It should give you a warning but you should be able to override it. Does anyone know how to get around this other than use a different preset? Most all the other presets create a much bigger lower quality file or render in a format not supported by youtube. ADOBE CAN YOU FIX THIS!

    Welcome to the forum.
    As Steve points out, that type of account, and its expanded duration, did not exist, when the current version of Premiere Elements was developed. Adobe went with what was available then. The expanded accounts are fairly new.
    I also agree with Steve that the "fix" is to just Export/Share to the proper YouTube settings, within the parameters of your expanded account, and then just manually upload it.
    My guess is that PrE 11 WILL handle the expanded accounts, but then if YouTube later expands the parameters more, the same thing will happen.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Composition Render Getting Stuck

    I'm having trouble accomplishing a full resolution render in AE.  Originally I tried exporting through AME, and even on low settings it was telling me to expect at least 180 hours to render.  Within AE, whether its H.264 or PNG, if I have the output setting on full resolution I never make it very far past 45-48 seconds in the export before it becomes bogged down and slows almost to a halt.  Several times now I've let it run up to 8 hours long and haven't seen anything beyond 48 seconds rendered of my 4 minute project.  Often it'll cruise through the first 30 seconds at a good speed, but not much beyond that.
    Within AE I'm able to knock it down to 1/4 resolution and get an MPEG2 to finish exporting in under an hour.  But obviously 1/4 resolution isn't going to yield me the professional product I want.  The project is just under 4 minutes long and I'm trying to make a high quality render for youtube.
    My source media is:
    1920x1080 (1.0), 24 fps, Progressive
    48000 Hz, Stereo
    My export settings that I want are pretty much the youtube HD preset:
    NTSC 1280x720, 24 fps, Progressive
    AAC, 128 kbps, 48 kHz, Stereo
    VBR, 2 Pass, Target 8.00, Max 9.00 (profile High, level 4.1)
    (I've also tried CBR @ .6 and that still clunks out past 30 seconds)
    Hardware:
    Intel Core2 6600 @ 2.4GHz
    4GHz RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 @ 2784 MB
    Effects used:
    This is my best guess at the hangup.  I have 155 AE elements.  Those 155 break down into:
    69 motion trackers
    2 solid layers (a slight color burn and slight vignette)
    1 adjustment layer with 3 effects
    2 sequences imported through the Premiere dynamic link including the motion tracking, a mask, 3 effects (including keylight, a simple choker and a simple wire removal), and a single audio track
    77 jpgs (each with 1 camera blur effect)
    4 short mp4 video tracks each between 3-3.2 MB

    I stopped the jpeg sequence rendering.  Turned out like all of the others.  Ran for over 16 hours and only got 53 seconds into the composition.
    Here's some screen shots.  The first is just a basic breakdown - the null objects with the tracking info continue all the way up to 1.  The jpgs/mp4 clips continue all of the way down to the bottom.  The middle is two dynamically linked sequences from premiere pro 5.5.  There's a solid yellow color burn above it at 8% opacity, an adjustment layer with curves, unsharp mask, and noise HLS, and a black solid vignette at 5% opacity.
    This shot highlights the biggest JPG and mp4 transform details.
    This last one highlights how I approached the tracking information.  Each shot had its own tracker.  A jpg is loaded and parented to the null object with the appropriate tracking information.  Highlighted is 75 (IMG_2087.jpg) being parented to 69 (Tracking).
    As for the jpg and mp4 dimensions... looking them up now.
    The mp4's are 320 x 240 and scaled sometimes up to near 1000%
    The smaller pictures (IMG_2087-92) are at 3648 x 2736 and the big one I use for any shot with a big pan (bigcenter) is 7608 x 2736.  My composition settings are 1920 x 1080.  Sounds like a bad match!  And I've got 77 of these!

  • I can't export or render in adobe premiere!! HELP HELP!!

    I Can't export anything at all.

    The reason I couldn't export was my video layer was H264 and my lower third was a nested animation codec as well as my end graphic. I exported movies without lower third and then composited them in after effects for my final render to youtube. see here:  MAR1 1 - YouTube

  • Youtube support stops on ATV2

    We have probably all heard about Youtube discontinueing the use of an old API which will render the Youtube app on the ATV2 useless.
    However Youtube will still work on the ATV3, why doesn't Apple simply update the youtube app for the ATV2?

    Send some feedback to:
    https://www.apple.com/feedback/appletv.html
    AppleTV2 is a good few years old now but  they stopped offering software updates last year from memory.
    Appreciate your frustration but I think we'll see this a lot with electronic devices in coming years.
    My Sony BluRay can no longer access certain online services as the old APIs have changed for one reason or another.

  • A problem with my After Effects CS6

    Hi there,
    I'm triying to render a video in HD quality (1280x1080) for YouTube, but when I'm rendering adobe says and error massage to me. It says:
    If someone can help me with this explaining how to solve my problem I'll be very glad.
    PD: Sorry for my english. And thanks to all who helps.

    HD for YouTube is 1920 X 1080 or 1280 X 720. You should stick with the square pixel presets.
    We don't know enough about your composition and we know nothing about how you set up the render. Generally it's better to render for YouTube using the Adobe Media Encoder. You'll get better results for the MPEG compression required for the web. Tell us more and maybe we can help. There are too many variables to give us any idea what happened without knowing more.

  • OS Crash when rendering project

    When I am rendering a project the OS crashes.  It's not a blue screen.  It actually just disappears.  Then entire machine just shuts off.
    The event viewer shows Event ID 41 (see event information below).  This is event it s new to the log.
    Repro Steps:
    - Copy any MTS file from my camera to the desktop (Canon VIXIA HF R21)
    - add it to the timeline
    - Render the file (render to youtube or locally as an avi)
    - The render never completes.  It crashes.  The machine just turns off.  (I was trying to use PRE to create a DV-AVI to edit)
    - It seems to fail at a specific step in the process.  Just not sure there is a log someplace for the render.
    Additional info.
    If I play any MTS file in the time line it flows nicely for about 20-30 seconds.  then the video gets jumpy.
    I understand the minimum system requiremetns for HD editing is 4GB Ram.  I see that I have 2GB.
    Question?
    Is this a problem that I could fix by throwing money at? (obviously that answer is usually yes, but I mean simply adding memory)  I would hate to buy an additional 2-4 GB's of RAM only to find out that was not the problem.
    It really feels like a step in the process is writing outside a buffer.  The OS just shuts down at that point.  It's not a reboot.  It just shuts off.  I have to manually restart the machine.
    System Info
    Hard Drive
    WD6400AAKS SATA 3 Gb/s,  7200rpm, 16 MB Cache, 640 GB
    System Information
    Time of this report: 4/7/2011, 20:12:00
    Machine name: IDK
    Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_rtm.101119-1850) (fully patched via Windows Update)
    Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
    System Manufacturer: HP-Pavilion
    System Model: AW011AV-ABA p6250t
    BIOS: BIOS Date: 05/06/09 11:31:10 Ver: 5.39
    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU    Q8300  @ 2.50GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.5GHz
    Available OS Memory: 2048MB RAM
    Page File: 1413MB used, 2680MB available
    Windows Dir: C:\Windows
    DirectX Version: DirectX 11
    DX Setup Parameters: Not found
    User DPI Setting: Using System DPI
    System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent)
    DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled
    DxDiag Version: 6.01.7601.17514 64bit Unicode
    Display Devices
    Card name: ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series      
    Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc.
    Chip type: ATI display adapter (0x954F)
    DAC type: Internal DAC(400MHz)
    Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_954F&SUBSYS_16131462&REV_00
    Display Memory: 1274 MB
    Dedicated Memory: 506 MB
    Shared Memory: 767 MB
    Current Mode: 1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz)
    Monitor Name: HP 2159 Series Wide LCD Monitor
    Monitor Model: HP 2159
    Monitor Id: HWP282B
    Native Mode: 1920 x 1080(p) (60.000Hz)
    Output Type: DVI
    Driver Name: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,a tiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
    Driver File Version: 8.17.0010.1070 (English)
    Driver Version: 8.831.2.0
    DDI Version: 10.1
    Driver Model: WDDM 1.1
    Driver Attributes: Final Retail
    Driver Date/Size: 3/8/2011 21:55:52, 795136 bytes
    Event Info
    System
    Provider
    [ Name]
    Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Power
    [ Guid]
    {331C3B3A-2005-44C2-AC5E-77220C37D6B4}
    EventID
    41
    Version
    2
    Level
    1
    Task
    63
    Opcode
    0
    Keywords
    0x8000000000000002
    John ...

    I find that Merlot makes all my video look better. 
    I went to Fry's and picked up a $19 heatsink.  It has the machine up and running.  The kids are "Happily" doing their homework again.
    I'm now looking for a new machine for editing.  I'll read through some of the posts and see where I'll end up.  Looks like an i9 9xx proc with 6-8 GB of RAM. and two HDD's (OS and Data).  An industrial HVAC system to keep the entire thing cool.
    GPU?  I'm sure it's important, I'd try to leverage that processor if I could.  But, PRE doesn't appear to have any settings, but I'm probably just missing something.
    I'll dig around those articles and try to pull someting together.
    John ....

  • Firefox Ver. 34.0.5 fails to render Youtube website. CSS not working. Ideas?

    Youtube.com website not rendering (CSS requests are not working), and videos not accessable. This is not related to any plugin issues, such as Flash, etc. The youtube.com main page renders like an experimental HTML document, with no style-sheet info. I've attached screen images to show what it looks like.
    I found one other similiar situation, in Arch-Linux, where the problem turned out to be a DNS configuration issue. I have tried many DNS configurations, and confirm I can get to every other website, and they seem to render ok. I can even watch videos on other websites, if I enable the Flash plugin. I have removed and re-installed Firefox at least three times, as I have it working correctly on several other machines (LInux and Windows ). The problem machine runs Windows XP, SP3, and is an older HP box. Note that all other websites seem to render correctly, and videos are watchable. It appears to be related to i.ytimg.com CSS (cascading style sheet) access just not working, but only for Youtube. Any ideas? Three detailed screen captures are provided below. I tried removing the firewall restrictions, made no difference. I also did a detailed scan for virus issues and malware, but no evidence of any found. I'm stymied. Any suggestions appreciated.
    One issue might be the recent TOR browser bundle, which I have installed on the machine. It works fine, and renders Youtube.com, but videos are slow. TOR documentation and technical reports assert that TOR-browser does not interact
    with existing browsers (it is Firefox 31.xx, I think.) TOR does establish proxy settings, and I have confirmed the Ver. 34 non-TOR Firefox is configured to not use any proxy setting.
    I am running out of ideas here. This behaviour is strange. Any suggestions how I can detail debug Firefox in operation as it does this broken rendering? The error even affects earlier versions of Firefox.

    *** SOLVED *** !!!
    Got it!
    I have spent *days* on this, because it just bugged me so much!
    FOund it by searching and reading all the Mozilla FIrefox support forums.
    Problem was an old hard-coded fix that I put into my HOSTS file, on my Windows XP, SP3 machine. Specifically, I had experienced hang issues with a site called "i.ytimg.com", which I believe is the static cache for Google/Youtube stuff. I tracked this error down to failures of security certificates, but confirmed my security cert store was isometric between my machine cluster (they were all the damn same!)
    So, I had put two lines in the HOSTS file, to hard-code an IP address so that Google-youtube pages would not hang up waiting for "i.ytimg.com"
    Well, of course, Google/Youtube is now using different locations, or akami servers or some damn thing...
    The fix just involved removing these two hard-coded lines from my HOSTS file. I just commented the old fix out, and now everything works.
    <pre>
    # --- two lines added to fix i.ytimg.com hang problem
    # 74.125.162.39 static.cache.l.google.com s.ytimg.com
    # 74.125.162.39 static.cache.l.google.com i.ytimg.com
    </pre>
    (The # symbol is used to make a comment in hosts file... )
    On Windows XP, XP3, the "hosts" file is typically located in:
    C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
    If you are having goofy problems with some youtube/google webpages
    not rendering, or generating SSL (bad_certificate) errors, check your
    "hosts" file, and ensure no ip redirection has been slotted in there
    from a while back.
    Hope this helps others...
    - Mark Langdon, GEMESYS Ltd.

  • YouTube Video: Do you recommend use maximum render quality?

    YouTube Video: Do you recommend use maximum render quality?
    Is it worth the wait?
    Do you use it for YouTube videos?
    How much longer does it take to render / export?
    Twice as long or ?
    Just looking for a general comparison in time based on with and without.
    I know it depends on variables.
    I'm already in the process at 21%. (15 mins.)
    Just curious for the future.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You can use the "Maximum Render Quality" whenever you are scaling down the resolution from larger frame size to smaller frame size while exporting.
    It requires more RAM during export & should be used whenever maximum quality output is required. However the export process may be slower than the normal export.
    Thanks.

  • Render issues for Youtube

    I am trying to render a project for youtube. I have uploaded screenshots of my render settings, which were recommended by other users as I am using the trial and dont know if I want to pay for this program. (The Advanced Settings for Audio has bitrate checked) It rendered with a mp4 ending but youtube says it isnt recognized. Is this normal or is something wrong with my settings?

    Use the preset it already has for YouTube, not a custom one. You will see it if you scroll down the box, pick out for example YouTube HD 1080p. If you're in 720P then pick that one.
    Another thing would be to try to not get an .mp4. Select quicktime on export.

  • Render Settings for Exporting 4k 60fps to Youtube

    I have been playing around with my new adobe cc 2014 and i gotta say i love it!
    the only problem is when uploading video in 4k to youtube it will only process in 4k if its 30fps max lock or less.
    if i upload 4k in 60fps it only goes to 1080p 60fps max. if you use google chrome.
    My question is how and what settings have worked for you to upload 4k in 60fps?

    Well i have seen many videos in 4k 60fps turns out its something to do with vp9 encoded files. so i encoded one in 4k 60fps and uploaded still only went to 60fps in 1080 and didnt not process up to 4k. so how can i get this done?
    site sources:
    Star Citizen: Pieces of Eight (Piracy and Boarding) - YouTube
    Redfoo - Juicy Wiggle (Lyric and Dance) - YouTube
    Batman: Arkham Origins benchmark — 4K resolution - YouTube
    [MV/HD 4K] SECRET (시크릿) - YOOHOO (유후) - YouTube
    Star Citizen: Pieces of Eight (Piracy and Boarding) - YouTube
    Terrifying Pyroclastic Flows Sinabung Volcano Eruption in 4K Ultra HD - YouTube
    2013 怡保斗母宫九皇大帝出巡大游行 (超高清 Ultra HD 4K) - YouTube
    How Paintballs Are Made at G.I. Sportz - YouTube

  • Settings for Youtube render?

    I may lower the resolution but the other settings are what I have a question with.
    I was doing some test renders earlier and ended up with audio artifacts/glitches, these settings seem to work but please correct any settings that are less than ideal.
    Format:   MPEG2
    Preset:    Custom
    Codec:    MainConcept MPEG Video
    Quality:    5
    TV Standard:   NTSC
    Frame Width:   1440 pixels
    Frame Height:   1080
    Frame Rate:      29.97
    Display Format: Drop Frame
    Use Maximum Render Quality:    Checked
    Field Order: Upper
    Pixel Aspect Ratio:  Widescreen 16:9
    Profile:  Main
    Level:    High
    Render at Maximum depth:   Unchecked
    Bitrate Encoding:  VBR, 2 Pass
    Minimum Bitrate:    4
    Target Bitrate:     15
    Maximum bitrate:   18.5
    GOP Settings
    M frames:     3
    N frames:  15
    Closed GOP every:      0
    Automatic GOP placement:   UNchecked
    Advanced Settings
    Macroblock Quantization:   10
    VBR Buffer Size:   112 x 2Kbytes
    Noise Control:   Sensitivity
    Write SDE:     Yes
    Video Format:     NTSE
    Horizontal:   1440
    Vertical:     1080
    Color Primaries:   ITU-R Rec. 709
    Transfer Characteristics:   "   "
    Matrix Coefficents:   "    "
    Force VBV Delay:  0xfff
    Intra DC Precision:   9 bits
    Write Sequence End Code:   Yes
    Embed SVCD User Blocks:   No
    Ignore FrameInterval:   0
    Use Maximum Render Quality:   Checked
    Use Frame Blending:             Unchecked
    Estimated File Size:   107 MB

    Thanks Ann and Bill. I will have to learn from this one and make sure I don't make that mistake again.
    The sound is ADR. Originally the voice was in camera but there was too much wind/ocean noise. Later, the voice was re-recorded indoors with same Canon HV20 camera but with an external $500 Sennheiser mic and a separate purchased ocean track was added.
    I never listened to it with headphones. I also didn't notice that although the voice is:
    Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - compressed - Stereo
    Project Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 32 bit floating point - Stereo
    with headphones I only hear it in one ear and, in Premiere, the track with the ADR voice recording shows 1 single soundwave(although it's in a stereo track) as opposed to the 2 soundwaves the purchased ocean wave track has.
    I must have to change some setting on the camera or within Premiere because the voice should be heard in both ears.
    Any thoughts, before I investigate, as to why the ADR with a external mic is "stereo" but heard in only one ear?

  • Render video in PS CS6

    I can render out the same video (same quality) in both PS CS5 and PS CS6, and in CS6 the mov file size will be about 10X bigger.
    How can I get CS6 to render out a smaller file size mov?
    examples (random ACS comertial/video from youtube)
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/videos/att/ACS_cs6.mov
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/videos/att/ACS_cs5.mov

    unless im missing something here
    cs5 has more options avalable for rendering mov then cs6, so in a way cs5 is more advanced
    on the highest settings cs5 is able to render a smaller file size with the same quality render
    I see that cs6 has mp4 available from media encoder, but i feel like its a step backwards since most of these videos still have to go though Media Encoder
    ... also Media Encoder doesn't have mov renders as an option
    the reason why this is such a huge issue is that pptx files strictly take mov as a preferred video file, the whole adv industry runs on pptx presentations
    cs5 - more options smaller files
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/attila/Screen%20Shot%202012-07-26%20at%201.57.16%20PM.png
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/attila/Screen%20Shot%202012-07-26%20at%201.57.31%20PM.png
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/attila/Screen%20Shot%202012-07-26%20at%202.09.08%20PM.png
    cs6 - less options larger (unusable size) files
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/attila/Screen%20Shot%202012-07-26%20at%201.56.20%20PM.png
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4135293/attila/Screen%20Shot%202012-07-26%20at%202.01.39%20PM.png

Maybe you are looking for