Rendering - abnormally slow or normal?

Hi folks,
I'm rendering a 2 minute piece of video imported as a Quick Time file (size = 2GB). It's just taken 35 minutes and is up to 6%.
It's the first time I've rendered a .mov file. I'm used to slow rendering, but this seems excessive. Is it normal?
I just read about Magic Bullet in this forum. Is that something anyone can shed light on for speeding up rendering in FCE?
Thanks,
Andrew

Hi Tom,
The video file supplied on the disk is actually 122MB, but because I cannot import that file directly into FCE, I had to convert it to .mov first. To do this I used SnapzPro (video capture software). After capturing the video as a Quick Time file, it became 2.4GB.
I imported the .mov file into FCE, and then had to render.
6 files came on the disk, but only one plays the 2 minute segment. That one has a file extension of .VOB. The others have extensions .IFO and .BUP (don't know what they're for).
Does that shed any more light?
Thanks for the info on Magic Bullet.
Andrew

Similar Messages

My iMac, OS 10.7.5, is abnormally slow on start-up, taking many minutes for my password sign-in window to show up. I've run Disk Permissions and have verified my hard drive and all is in order. What do I do to start up my Mac in a normal manner?

My iMac, OS 10.7.5, is abnormally slow on start-up, taking many minutes for my password sign-in window to show up. I've run Disk Permissions and have verified my hard drive and all is in order. What do I do to start up my Mac in a normal manner?

If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Step 1
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Enter "BOOT_TIME" (without the quotes) in the search box. Note the timestamps of those log messages, which refer to the times when the system was booted. Now clear the search box and scroll back in the log to the last boot time when you had the problem. Select the messages logged after the boot, during the time something abnormal was happening. Copy them to the Clipboard (command-C). Paste into a reply to this message (command-V).
For example, if the problem is a slow startup taking three minutes, post the messages timestamped within three minutes after the boot time, not before. Please include the BOOT_TIME message at the beginning of the log extract.
If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don’t post many repetitions of the same message.
When posting a log extract, be selective. In most cases, a few dozen lines are more than enough.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.
Step 2
Still in Console, look under System Diagnostic Reports for crash or panic logs, and post the entire contents of the most recent one, if any. In the interest of privacy, I suggest you edit out the “Anonymous UUID,” a long string of letters, numbers, and dashes in the header of the report, if present (it may not be.) Please don’t post shutdownStall, spin, or hang logs — they're very long and not helpful.

Cut and paste operation in Hyperion Planning is slower than normal web page

We understand the web form under Hyperion Planning has many useful functions built-in but we also encountered some user complains that the operation inside the web form is relatively slower than normal web page. When user cut and paste 20 to 50 cells content, they need to wait 1 to 5 seconds on the "copy" function.
Any workaround can be implemented to improved the user experience? We have asked Oracle whether we can disable the SQL statement behind but no firm reply yet.
Thanks a lot for your help!

JohnGoodwin wrote:
Hi,
It has always been a bit of an issue, they supposely resolved in it earlier releases though I am not sure how much there really did resolve it.
It is down to the amount of Javascript that is used in the web forms and how much rendering and validation it has to go through.
The spec of client machines sometimes can have performance impact.
One route is to use smart view to enter data into forms, as it is excel based it should be much quicker to cut/copy and paste.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/
John, thanks for your advice.
Yes SmartView should improve the operational speed. However as not all of our users are using SmartView we are looking for some ways to improve the web form speed.

SSRS Subreport - Renders very slow

Hi All,
I have a subreport which is embedded in the main report (form report) which is inturn embedded in a list. The report is executed for different levels with each level having different number of records (say 100, 150, etc.) and gives us a form for each
of the records on a single page. That is the report will have 150 pages for 150 records. My subreport renders very fast when it is run stand alone. Even the SPs written for the subreport are giving results within seconds. But when embedded in the main
report, the whole report is rendering very slow.
I tried passing the parameters to the subreport in two different ways:
1. Assigned the main dataset's record id to the subreport which gives correct data but taking very long time to generate the report.
2. Assigned the main dataset's record id to a hidden parameter and passing that parameter to the subreport as a parameter. This way the report renders very fast but the subreport is always giving the results for the first record id. That is even for the
second record, the subreport is showing up the first record's details which is incorrect.
Have been struggling with this issue for a while. Request you to help me in this regard.
Regards,
Bala.

Hi Bala,
According to your description, it seems that the issue is caused by the parameters. Please check the parameters setting of each subreport control in the main report. Make sure the data types are the same between the parameters, and the values passed to the
subreport parameters are correct.
As to the report performance, we can refer to the ExecutionLog View to monitor it. The total time to generate a reporting server report (RDL) can be divided into 3 elements:
Total time = (TimeDataRetrieval) + (TimeProcessing) + (TimeRendering)
For more details about troubleshooting report performance, please refer to the following documents:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522806(v=sql.105).aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robertbruckner/archive/2009/01/05/executionlog2-view.aspx
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Premiere CS4 Rendering very slow

recently premier started rendering very slow after making a change to an effect or adding something, etc..
No hardware or software has been added or changed, have tried defragging, updating drivers, etc. Is there some sort of cache or flush I don't know about that premiere uses?
If anyone has any suggestions I am willing to try almost anything because hours of googling have not brought me any luck.
Here are my computer specs right from dxdiag :
System Information
Time of this report: 5/24/2010, 12:19:54
   Operating System: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_gdr.100226-1909)
          Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: System manufacturer
       System Model: System Product Name
               BIOS: BIOS Date: 11/12/09 16:29:41 Ver: 08.00.15
          Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
             Memory: 6144MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 6134MB RAM
          Page File: 3554MB used, 8711MB available
        Windows Dir: C:\Windows
    DirectX Version: DirectX 11
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
   User DPI Setting: Using System DPI
System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent)
    DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled
     DxDiag Version: 6.01.7600.16385 32bit Unicode
Display Devices
          Card name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
       Manufacturer: NVIDIA
          Chip type: Quadro FX 1800
           DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
         Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0638&SUBSYS_062C10DE&REV_A1
     Display Memory: 3560 MB
   Dedicated Memory: 749 MB
      Shared Memory: 2811 MB
       Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
       Monitor Name: Generic PnP Monitor
      Monitor Model: FPD1810
         Monitor Id: GWY0712
        Native Mode: 1280 x 1024(p) (60.020Hz)
        Output Type: HD15
        Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Driver File Version: 8.17.0011.9759 (English)
     Driver Version: 8.17.11.9759

One hard drive means one set of read/write heads... which can not be in two places at the same time
When parts of the program or swap file are being read from or written to... the data files suffer
A link with many ideas about computer setup http://forums.adobe.com/thread/436215?tstart=0
And even more hardware discussion http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/hardware_forum
Including this post about 3 possible builds http://forums.adobe.com/thread/598040?tstart=0
You really need a 2nd hard drive for video files... I haven't looked in a long time, but I think the official system requirements on Adobe's page even says something about a DEDICATED 7200rpm drive for files

MacPro 12c FCPX 10.1.3 rendering too slow

When I look at my activity monitor it say its only using 700-800% of cpu when doing any kind of exporting or sharing. I use a MacPro late 2013 12core.
yes it still is faster than anything else I have used but was wondering why it does not go any higher. Ive seen it spke everyonce in a while to 1200-1400%

Tim, I have no answer to your question. I have 6 cores and actually not measured the CPU usage. But here is an article that could be of interest. Your question is valid, you name rendering is slow, but that has very little to do with CPU, it is the GPU that counts.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7603/mac-pro-review-late-2013/4

Big problem with AE CS3 - abnormal slow with nvidia 8800 GTS 512 !

I try everything, newest drivers (nvidia 8800 GTS 512), older drivers, beta drivers, alternative drivers, uninstall QTime, disable OpenGL in After Effects, delete openGL plugin.... Simply, did not help. AE CS3 is abnormal slow, type text, draw and edit mask, any kind of moving element , moving windows (interface).... everything. When turn on openGL, openGL work fine, fast, smooth., but non openGL operation (written above), still the same! I did some test and found that similar problem have with encore (not my primary application, but...). Other programs work perfectly (premiere, photoshop, illustrator). I have core2 quad 6600 @ 3 GHz, 3 GB RAM, 8800 GTS 512 @ 2560 x 1600, win XP pro strong configuration but unusable for AE CS3!!! I try to reduce resolution, but also, did not help.
Please, is there anyone with some solution? Is problem with AE or drivers? Thanks.

>My 8800GT is not going to work with AE and it's listed under Adobe's
>supported graphic cards????
That's premature to say. Please understand that in the OpenGL game there are just too many varaibles, a lot of them outside the control of Adobe or any other software vendor for that matter. Please consider the following:
- if tested, a card is usually tested in one configuration available at the time that presumably will be the most common one bought by users. There is room for better sub-versions (more VRAM, higher memory clock), as well as weaker ones (less VRAM, lower clock speed).
- the previous applies to the host computer. Nobody can test the 100 new different motherboards that come out every month let alone all that are already on the market. Same for RAM, processors, other peripherals.
- multiple vendors may produce cards based on the same design, but may use different BIOSes and branding
- even under ideal conditions, a given graphics card will be tested in about 30 different computer or so - some in Adobe's lab, others with Beta testers. As it stands, neither of them will necessarily coincide with your configuration nor will anyone throw a lot of money out of the window just to buy a hundred new testing machines...
- BIOS configuration, motherboard voltage fluctuations, PCI timings and whatnot can vary from user to user and thus have drastically different influence how a certain component behaves.
- lastly, driver configuration can vary. Even with seemingly the same driver version, the config may auto-adapt to different settings based on the environment it finds.
So given all of the above, please understand that this is a *******' tough job and by all rights nobody intentionally tries to scam users or something like that. You will also find it hard to blame anyone in legal terms, as you usually agree to use the software "as is" - with all it's flaws. As David says - please try first. We will gladly try to help you sort out any issues and who knows - none of the problems affecting other users may come down on you and you'll be a happy camper after all.
Mylenium

Premiere exports and rendering too slow

I’m using Premier Pro CC on a 2012 MacPro (aluminum box) with 16gigs or RAM.
I have to say that being a long time Avid Media Composer editor I am very, very pleased with the UI and overall capability of Premiere. It’s loaded with tiny nuances that Avid should have incorporated a long time ago. I am in love with this software.
Or at least I was until I went to export my files. What a slog! I’m sorry but the exports are out to lunch. A six minute 1080p 23.976fps sequence with a few titles, a basic colour effect and two tracks of audio takes…. 3 hours?!?!?? What the heck? If I was rendering an equivalent sequence in the Avid I’d be done rendering any effects and exporting a source QT by the time I finished this sentence. And if I set that QT up to encode in Sorenson I’d have my MP4 done by the end of this email. And the Avid doesn’t need to use any external hardware to ramp things up. In addition, just typing this email while Media Encoder pushes through the output (even with Premiere closed) is causing my whole system to slow down to a point that I find my computer basically unusable for anything else. 16 gigs of RAM and 2x six core processors and it’s acting like it’s 1996 running OS7.
Now wait, I hear you say, you can do so much more in Premiere. Yes, I can. But the moment I drop, for example, an After Effect link in there…I can feel the system trying to race glaciers - and losing. What I don’t get is if I were to use the the equivalent clips in After Effects doing the equivalent type of effects the render would be way faster than Premiere --- and it’s the same company! And don’t get me started on Speedgrade. I’m better off doing an oil painting of each frame than using that Dynamic Link function. And teh dynamic links are what encouraged me to try all this in the first place.
Pre-rendering everything is not only awkward but appears to have no effect on the export time - or playback for that matter. In fact I find the rendering of effects rather confusing and horribly inaccurate - both in its estimate of time to go and the number of frames to process. And what is a 'video preview’ anyway -is that the number of clips? Effects? Effects and clips? Grains of sand on a beach? And why does it’s number keep going up too? It just keeps climbing for no reason I can see. C’mon Premiere…it’s basic math- you count how many frames and then that’s the total number of frames. Why are you recalculating? And did you borrow your time estimate code from Windows 98’s progress bar? One thing it does tell you accurately is how much time you’ve been waiting. That’s handy (not). Oh and I sooooo love the fact that if I quit the rendering process it keeps NOTHING from what it did before. So i have two choices: quit this seemingly endless render to try something else only to find it didn’t help ... or stay put and watch my life drip away into nothingness. Right now, on a second sequence, it says "ETA - 13 seconds left" for, like the LAST 2 hours.
I can’t help but think Premiere is too caught up on render-free editing and it’s glorious Mercury Engine when they should be making it faster & easier to render effects for smoother playback and much faster exports. In my Media Composer I may not have as much robust real time function as I would like but it doesn't choke on the basics (title, colour crrection, dissolves) and the renders are so fast I don't care that I even have to render.
Maybe I’m doing something wrong but I’ll be damned if I know what. And no one else is talking. As I skip around the Google-sphere I’m amazed how many people are posing about speed issues (very common Google search result) and so many other editors are retorting “seems pretty normal to me”. No it ain’t. This is NOT normal. This is painfully slow and in no way reflects the current state of speed for import & exports in NLEs.
I’ve watched every tutorial I could find, picked over every preference, closed every other application, tried different media types, purged every bit of cache and even restarted with no discernible difference. At this stage I’d be thrilled to find out if I’m doing something wrong. But until then I’m afraid this software will not be a regular part of my tool set. This is very disappointing from Premiere given how everything else seems to work so well. Such a shame. This software could kick some serious butt otherwise.
Maybe Premiere will announce that they have a new render engine at NAB?…crossing fingers? Don’t think so.
><({(º>

Thanks for the reply SAFEHARBOR11.
I agree, something isn't right. I've watched tutorials where the renders appear to happen in a "reasonable" amount of time and the numbers of frames and videos prviews never increases. So I don't know what is going on with me.
While I have researched into render/don't render workflow with Premiere I can say I tried both ways only out of desperation.
For my system, a MacPro from 2012, we got only one choice for a video card from Apple - ATI Radeon HD 5870. I tried to get a CUDA enabled card (3rd party) installed but despite tremendous research I could not find something that was authorized to work on my system. At the time I wanted the CUDA to accelerate by Sorenson encoding.
One 2011 post suggested that my issue was related to corrupt media. They had suggested that I try and isolate the timeline down by testing one section at a time with exports until the exports went from fast to excruciatingly slow. As I was working on multiple sequences without common media between them I had reasoned that the software may not have liked my Sony F5 native media (although it plays it just fine). So I took the time to transcode all my footage and use that instead— with absolutely no difference. Even if it did make a difference I’d be disappointed because working natively with my media in Premiere was a huge time saver, unlike the Avid which claims to work with native media but really it leaves the system and editing sow & unresponsive so I usually end up transcoding anyway.
My media encoder settings were the template h264 as a Youtube 720p, 23.976 file. Nothing remarkable there. (Although I did try other settings to see if that affected anything - it didn’t).
><({(º>

Timeout portlet rendering for slow or non responsive portlets ?

Hi,
We have a requirement to implement a timeout for portlet rendering on a
portal if the rendering of any of the portlets exceed a specified time
interval (configurable).
For example if a portlet would normally take 200ms to render, if during
the render phase that time limit is exceeded then the content of the
portlet should not rendered but instead an error message is displayed.
The idea behind this is to prevent problems with a single portlet
stopping the rendering of the portal page itself. If for example a
portlet uses a database but the response time for that DB is slow we do
not want this to hold up the render of the entire portal page.
Can anyone recommend how might be the best way to implement this
functionality in 8.1 ?. Furthermore if there is no mechanism to do this
in 8.1 are there any roadmap plans to implement this kind of feature in
the product at any point in the future in an SP or major release ??.
The current portal that we are migrating uses Watchdog to implement this
functionality currently and thus we need to be able to imitate this
during the migration to 8.1.
TIA
Martin

It was my antivirus clogging the pipes. I installed another and it's fine.

Abnormally Slow Powermac G4

I have a powermac G4 that is now about 3 years old. I have used it frequently over those years and have never had a problem with it, but once I installed 10.4 all the user acounts have been extremely slow, except the original acount created which works fine. Every time I switch between a Program or go to the Finder it has to think for about 10 seconds before it will switch, and during those ten seconds it is unresponsive. Also, when on the user/ non- admin acounts, It tends to freeze an abnormal amount. (It usually freezes up about 3 or 4 times a day). I don't use the computer a whole lot, but my family does, and i've finally gotten around to asking about it. I've tried installing more memory, and that didn't work, so I was wondering if you had any other suggestions?

I've had similar problems ..not constant. But a real drag when it happens... - and I'm still at 10.4.3 ATM ..
I suspect Tiger in general of course - because my system has remained untouched and the probs only started after the upgrades ...
Activity monitor (and little 'procesor window') shows nothing strange (but then it is conceivable that IT may being affected too in some way and may not be being updated whilst the processor is actually looping at 100% frantically doing something else..)
my probs are same with orig main admin account.
LONG pauses unresponsive - incl to KBD [CMD-OPT-ESC, F9, F10, F12] - for changing apps, in finder... if things are bouncing in the dock .. they slow/stop/restrt/ in 200Ms jumps with larger gaps .. it'll even affect me when I'm typing a phrase omitting letters in what wd normally be in the type-ahead buffer - they don't appear at all - as if the processor etc is completely unresponsive - in bursts .. I have 768 meg of ram which shd be plenty for the load .. this 'keyboard' thing happens even when I don't notice 'unresponsiveness' - letters 'drop out' when I'm typing - as if I'm having short 'mini-freezes'... in addition to the long, noticeable ones (it's happening now as I type ...)
Like you, I tried more memory which immediately made the problem worse - AND introduced freezes etc - even tho latest techtools pro etc report that the mem tests ok ... going back strictly to my original mem config (same dimms, same slots..) helped somewhat .. - worth you checking - these beasts can be very finicky about memory .. - like witchcraft
The problems appear to get worse the longer it's been since cold boot. - Is this so with you? It also worst when more apps, more windows are in use ...
My 'sixth sense' for these things associates the probs with these :
* a Finder internal problem. - Sometimes I've done nothing but 'relaunch Finder' and the probs often go away a while ..
The system as a whole seems to do a lot of unnecessary paging (why page when there's plenty of free Real mem ?) Maybe there's a bug in memory handling somewhere.
* Spotlight - a suspect. [gonna try turning it off/disabling].
* Safari - a suspect. The problems appear to get worse if it is or has been running. I'm going to switch to Firefox exclusively for a while .. RSS may be part of it. Safari seems to need WAY too much real & virtual mem and eat too many processor cycles (like 280MB of Real and 580MB of Virtual for a few windows & tabs = 11 threads and regular jumps to 30% proc when it isn't really doing anything...... Why ? - those numbers look silly/incorrect)
*memory config changes .. check as advised. try resetting PRam.
* something in Dashboard. I may try disabling.
ON several occasions, the pauses hve [note that last word) turned into an apparent complete freeze - I try various things to cause an interrupt/change in status - unplug network/usb/KBD.. then back in .. no help .. yet, when I go to another system on the network, expecting no response, it responds to pings .. so I try SSH - a brief delay .. and I'm asked for a PW .. another .. and I'm in .. terminal IS responsive : TOP doesn't appear to show anything odd .. - I kill a few things and eventually responsiveness returns . I save what I can and cold boot.
I've noticed a number of times that SystemUIServer goes 'unresponsive/not responding'. Its Parent process appears to start additional Copies of it - but it IS unusual.
ATM, I'm toying with going up to 10.4.4 and whatever else there is . If that doesn't work, I guess it's back to the latest 10.3.x.
Have you made any changes to or had problems with USB lately ? I have a feeling it's also involved somehow.
Will advise.
Anyone with a similar set of probs, please DO post here . This is a weird one.

IMac works fine in safe mode, extremely slow in normal mode

Hey guys, I'm going nuts!
My mac got stuck on a white screen, I ended up reinstalling Snow Leopard - now when I boot in normal mode everything is extrememly slow - when I mouse over the corner of a window (close minimise etc) is stops and takes about 10 seconds to make the rollover affect (putting the "x" in the red circle). When I move the mouse over anything on the desktop, it stops working for about 10 seconds as well. The mouse moves around the screen fine, and after a lot of painful (and very patient) clicking, I can transfer files around fine - happens just as fast as it would normally, windows open as normal etc.
The most frustrating part is - everything works fine is safe mode! I'm typing this message on the mac now... I was thinking that I could transfer all of my data on to an external drive, but safe mode won't recognise them it took me about 10 minutes to select a folder and copy it to a hard drive in normal mode - I can't drag over a few items because of the mouse problem...
I have updated my software - can't open the app store for some reason (I want to upgrade to Lion as well). No idea what to do...

One of the primary difference between a safe boot and a normal boot is that all third party software is prevented from starting in the safe boot. So it sounds like something you installed on your Mac is causing the problems.
Are you running any kind of AV software?
If you are I would suggest that you start by unsintalling it. There are no virus on the Mac for the AV software to find any way so all it ever does is cause problems.
Allan

AE CC not rendering, chronically slow on start up, quicktime not installing, all on a trial copy

I have just downloaded AE CC trioal on to my new iMac.
on boot up it is chronically slow, but eventually it loads and shows a warning of no quicktime loaded......
looked at a discussion here saying to remove file to trash , but this file doesn't exist in my quicktime folder......
I have made a piece of work and when io go to render it gives me an error code of 39::99
, so i have no way of rendering and am not technical enough to work out what to do. Please help someone

How to view the ~/Library folder in Mavericks | Macworld
You need to look at the USER library folder. You can also view a link to the library folder by going to Finder>Go and hold down the Alt/Option key.

Why does Premiere Pro CC 2014 renders incredibly slow?

Dear Premiere Pro experts
I created a movie with Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2014 and I have serious performance issues when it comes to export the movie.
The first 10% renders pretty fast and takes 1 hour. Then it takes for every additional 1% about 4 hours! (never rendered it to finish so far, 14% max so far)
Here are some facts that might help to isolate the problem:
Project:
Length: 24 minutes in total, splitted into several sequences (up to 4 minutes) and arranged on a "main-sequence"
Input: Cineform AVI files, 1080p, 59fps (I converted GoPro 3+ footage (3D!) using GoPro Studio to the Cineform format for further processing)
Desired Output: Same as input, preserving 3D (Render 3D Intermediate)
Effects used: Warp-Stabilizer (default settings) and Auto-Color (smoothing 1-2 sec) on almost every clip.
Hardware / Software:
i7-3770K @3.5 GHZ (Quadcore)
16 GB RAM
NVIDIA Geforce GTX 970 (also tried with a ATI Radeon R9 290X)
Windows 8.1
SSD for OS and programs, RAID 0 for media files and project, separate drive for rendering output.
Then I tried to render using AME using the same settings. The whole video rendered in about 14 hours what is acceptable in my case. There problem here is that the 3D gets lost, even if I selected "Render 3D Intermediate". The picture for the left eye is the same as the one for the right eye. This is not happening when I do a direct export. But the direct export get almost stuck at around 10%.
There is almost no difference in choosing Software-Rendering and GPU. Also, the GPU has almost no load. Premiere Pro uses the CPU for about 45% (total usage 65%) and takes up 5-9 GB of memory (total usage 65%). Disk usage at around 14b/s.
I think there are two problems. One is that AME renders differently (no 3D) and the other is that the direct export takes way too long.
Can someone help me with any of these problems?
Thank you,
Martin

I did some additional research and found out, that the slow rendering happens with this combination:
- Auto-Color using Temporal Smoothing
- Render 3D Intermediate
Without rendering the 3D intermediate, Temporal Smoothing is not a problem. And without temporal smoothing, Rendering 3D Intermediate is not a problem.
Might this be a problem in the codec or in Premiere?

GPU acceleration is grayed out in Premiere and AE, but not in Media Encoder. However, rendering is slow in all 3 programs.

It worked fine in CS6.
Now, everytime I open a project (Pr or Ae) I get the message: This project was last used with GPU Accelerated rendering. This happens with all projects, even with those that I created in Pr/Ae CC, with GPU Accelerated rendering already disabled.
In Media Encoder, the GPU Acceleration is not grayed out, but still if I render a premiere sequence or an ae comp via ME, its very very slow. (takes 5 hours for a video that took 20 mins in CS6)
Any thoughts?
Thanks, Daniel

I think I found the problem. On the website you linked, it says:
The following notebooks are not compatible with this tool:
Notebooks equipped with switchable graphics
Toshiba® notebooks
Sony® VAIO® notebooks
Panasonic® notebooks
And I have a Sony VAIO.
When searching for drivers, I only found sites like these: AMD Radeon HD 7650M drivers
Are these legit?

Preview rendering Very Slow

Hi,
Can anyone help with Preview.app slow rendering issue for large PDF files, it is very slow after upgrading to lion. (AutoCAD drawings that are PDFed)
Small PDF documents are fine.

Hi Guys I work with a lot of pdf files with being a student at uni and not sure these tips might help.
Try an app called skim which is free it handles pdfs nicely and looks similar to the preview app.
Also if a pdf is slow to scroll try selecting all the pages goto file print. Then on the bottom left hand side of the print window select pdf and then save as pdf. I have found on some pdfs (usually the ones in black and white and look like a photo copy) using the the print save as pdf option has then allowed me to view a pdf fine in the preview app without any issues. Hope this is useful.
I suspect its to do with pixels per inch or dots per inch of the document.

Rendering - abnormally slow or normal?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for