Rendering so slow!

i am using adobe premiere cs3, when it comes to rendering .avi to .mpg2 DVD or avi to avi very slow rendering compare to ulead mediastudio. it take more than 3hours rendering the 130mins movie(project) while in ulead mediastudio it take only 1hr and 30-40mins.
I like to edit in adobe premiere than ulead,the only problem is, is in rendering so very slow. is there any solution to make it fast?
My unit specification is:
processor : AMD X2 dual core 5000
motherboard : Asrock
MEMORY : 2GB
HD : 160GB
OS : Windows XP SP2

At those write speeds, it's very likely not hurting either.
Generally speaking, the most effective way to speed up rendering is to buy a faster processor. Adding memory might help, but not nearly as much. Depending on the effects used, a powerful graphics card might also help some, but again not nearly as much as a new CPU.

Similar Messages

  • SSRS Subreport - Renders very slow

    Hi All,
    I have a subreport which is embedded in the main report (form report) which is inturn embedded in a list. The report is executed for different levels with each level having different number of records (say 100, 150, etc.) and gives us a form for each
    of the records on a single page. That is the report will have 150 pages for 150 records. My subreport renders very fast when it is run stand alone. Even the SPs written for the subreport are giving results within seconds. But when embedded in the main
    report, the whole report is rendering very slow.
    I tried passing the parameters to the subreport in two different ways:
    1. Assigned the main dataset's record id to the subreport which gives correct data but taking very long time to generate the report.
    2. Assigned the main dataset's record id to a hidden parameter and passing that parameter to the subreport as a parameter. This way the report renders very fast but the subreport is always giving the results for the first record id. That is even for the
    second record, the subreport is showing up the first record's details which is incorrect.
    Have been struggling with this issue for a while. Request you to help me in this regard.
    Regards,
    Bala.

    Hi Bala,
    According to your description, it seems that the issue is caused by the parameters. Please check the parameters setting of each subreport control in the main report. Make sure the data types are the same between the parameters, and the values passed to the
    subreport parameters are correct.
    As to the report performance, we can refer to the ExecutionLog View to monitor it. The total time to generate a reporting server report (RDL) can be divided into 3 elements:
    Total time = (TimeDataRetrieval) + (TimeProcessing) + (TimeRendering)
    For more details about troubleshooting report performance, please refer to the following documents:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522806(v=sql.105).aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robertbruckner/archive/2009/01/05/executionlog2-view.aspx
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • Premiere CS4 Rendering very slow

    recently premier started rendering very slow after making a change to an effect or adding something, etc.. 
    No hardware or software has been added or changed, have tried defragging, updating drivers, etc.  Is there some sort of cache or flush I don't know about that premiere uses?
    If anyone has any suggestions I am willing to try almost anything because hours of googling have not brought me any luck.
    Here are my computer specs right from dxdiag :
    System Information
    Time of this report: 5/24/2010, 12:19:54
       Operating System: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_gdr.100226-1909)
              Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
    System Manufacturer: System manufacturer
           System Model: System Product Name
                   BIOS: BIOS Date: 11/12/09 16:29:41 Ver: 08.00.15
              Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         920  @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
                 Memory: 6144MB RAM
    Available OS Memory: 6134MB RAM
              Page File: 3554MB used, 8711MB available
            Windows Dir: C:\Windows
        DirectX Version: DirectX 11
    DX Setup Parameters: Not found
       User DPI Setting: Using System DPI
    System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent)
        DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled
         DxDiag Version: 6.01.7600.16385 32bit Unicode
    Display Devices
              Card name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
           Manufacturer: NVIDIA
              Chip type: Quadro FX 1800
               DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
             Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0638&SUBSYS_062C10DE&REV_A1
         Display Memory: 3560 MB
       Dedicated Memory: 749 MB
          Shared Memory: 2811 MB
           Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
           Monitor Name: Generic PnP Monitor
          Monitor Model: FPD1810
             Monitor Id: GWY0712
            Native Mode: 1280 x 1024(p) (60.020Hz)
            Output Type: HD15
            Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
    Driver File Version: 8.17.0011.9759 (English)
         Driver Version: 8.17.11.9759

    One hard drive means one set of read/write heads... which can not be in two places at the same time
    When parts of the program or swap file are being read from or written to... the data files suffer
    A link with many ideas about computer setup http://forums.adobe.com/thread/436215?tstart=0
    And even more hardware discussion http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/hardware_forum
    Including this post about 3 possible builds http://forums.adobe.com/thread/598040?tstart=0
    You really need a 2nd hard drive for video files... I haven't looked in a long time, but I think the official system requirements on Adobe's page even says something about a DEDICATED 7200rpm drive for files

  • MacPro 12c FCPX 10.1.3 rendering too slow

    When I look at my activity monitor it say its only using 700-800% of cpu when doing any kind of exporting or sharing. I use a MacPro late 2013 12core.
    yes it still is faster than anything else I have used but was wondering why it does not go any higher. Ive seen it spke everyonce in a while to 1200-1400%

    Tim, I have no answer to your question. I have 6 cores and actually not measured the CPU usage. But here is an article that could be of interest. Your question is valid, you name rendering is slow, but that has very little to do with CPU, it is the GPU that counts.
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/7603/mac-pro-review-late-2013/4

  • AE CC not rendering, chronically slow on start up, quicktime not installing, all on a trial copy

    I have just downloaded AE CC trioal on to my new iMac.
    on boot up it is chronically slow, but eventually it loads and shows a warning of no quicktime loaded......
    looked at a discussion here saying to remove  file to trash , but this file doesn't exist in my quicktime folder......
    I have made a piece of work and when io go to render it gives me an error code of 39::99
    , so i have no way of rendering and am not technical enough to work out what to do. Please help someone

    How to view the ~/Library folder in Mavericks | Macworld
    You need to look at the USER library folder. You can also view a link to the library folder by going to Finder>Go and hold down the Alt/Option key.

  • Premiere exports and rendering too slow

    I’m using Premier Pro CC on a 2012 MacPro (aluminum box) with 16gigs or RAM.
    I have to say that being a long time Avid Media Composer editor I am very, very pleased with the UI and overall capability of Premiere. It’s loaded with tiny nuances that Avid should have incorporated a long time ago. I am in love with this software.
    Or at least I was until I went to export my files. What a slog! I’m sorry but the exports are out to lunch. A six minute 1080p 23.976fps sequence with a few titles, a basic colour effect and two tracks of audio takes…. 3 hours?!?!?? What the heck? If I was rendering an equivalent sequence in the Avid I’d be done rendering any effects and exporting a source QT by the time I finished this sentence. And if I set that QT up to encode in Sorenson I’d have my MP4 done by the end of this email. And the Avid doesn’t need to use any external hardware to ramp things up. In addition, just typing this email while Media Encoder pushes through the output (even with Premiere closed) is causing my whole system to slow down to a point that I find my computer basically unusable for anything else. 16 gigs of RAM and 2x six core processors and it’s acting like it’s 1996 running OS7.
    Now wait, I hear you say, you can do so much more in Premiere. Yes, I can. But the moment I drop, for example, an After Effect link in there…I can feel the system trying to race glaciers - and losing. What I don’t get is if I were to use the the equivalent clips in After Effects doing the equivalent type of effects the render would be way faster than Premiere --- and it’s the same company! And don’t get me started on Speedgrade. I’m better off doing an oil painting of each frame than using that Dynamic Link function. And teh dynamic links are what encouraged me to try all this in the first place.
    Pre-rendering everything is not only awkward but appears to have no effect on the export time - or playback for that matter. In fact I find the rendering of effects rather confusing and horribly inaccurate - both in its estimate of time to go and the number of frames to process. And what is a 'video preview’ anyway -is that the number of clips? Effects?  Effects and clips? Grains of sand on a beach? And why does it’s number keep going up too? It just keeps climbing for no reason I can see. C’mon Premiere…it’s basic math- you count how many frames and then that’s the total number of frames. Why are you recalculating? And did you borrow your time estimate code from Windows 98’s progress bar? One thing it does tell you accurately is how much time you’ve been waiting. That’s handy (not). Oh and I sooooo love the fact that if I quit the rendering process it keeps NOTHING from what it did before. So i have two choices: quit this seemingly endless render to try something else only to find it didn’t help ... or stay put and watch my life drip away into nothingness. Right now, on a second sequence, it says "ETA - 13 seconds left" for, like the LAST 2 hours.
    I can’t help but think Premiere is too caught up on render-free editing and it’s glorious Mercury Engine when they should be making it faster & easier to render effects for smoother playback and much faster exports. In my Media Composer I may not have as much robust real time function as I would like but it doesn't choke on the basics (title, colour crrection, dissolves) and the renders are so fast I don't care that I even have to render.
    Maybe I’m doing something wrong but I’ll be damned if I know what. And no one else is talking. As I skip around the Google-sphere I’m amazed how many people are posing about speed issues (very common Google search result) and so many other editors are retorting “seems pretty normal to me”. No it ain’t. This is NOT normal. This is painfully slow and in no way reflects the current state of speed for import & exports in NLEs.
    I’ve watched every tutorial I could find, picked over every preference, closed every other application, tried different media types, purged every bit of cache and even restarted with no discernible difference. At this stage I’d be thrilled to find out if I’m doing something wrong. But until then I’m afraid this software will not be a regular part of my tool set. This is very disappointing from Premiere given how everything else seems to work so well. Such a shame. This software could kick some serious butt otherwise.
    Maybe Premiere will announce that they have a new render engine at NAB?…crossing fingers? Don’t think so.
    ><({(º>

    Thanks for the reply SAFEHARBOR11.
    I agree, something isn't right. I've watched tutorials where the renders appear to happen in a "reasonable" amount of time and the numbers of frames and videos prviews never increases. So I don't know what is going on with me.
    While I have researched into render/don't render workflow with Premiere I can say I tried both ways only out of desperation.
    For my system, a MacPro from 2012, we got only one choice for a video card from Apple - ATI Radeon HD 5870. I tried to get a CUDA enabled card (3rd party) installed but despite tremendous research I could not find something that was authorized to work on my system. At the time I wanted the CUDA to accelerate by Sorenson encoding.
    One 2011 post suggested  that my issue was related to corrupt media. They had suggested that I try and isolate the timeline down by testing one section at a time with exports until the exports went from fast to excruciatingly slow. As I was working on multiple sequences without common media between them I had reasoned that the software may not have liked my Sony F5 native media (although it plays it just fine). So I took the time to transcode all my footage and use that instead—  with absolutely no difference. Even if it did make a difference I’d be disappointed because working natively with my media in Premiere was a huge time saver, unlike the Avid which claims to work with native media but really it leaves the system and editing sow & unresponsive so I usually end up transcoding anyway.
    My media encoder settings were the template h264 as a Youtube 720p, 23.976 file. Nothing remarkable there. (Although I did  try other settings to see if that affected anything - it didn’t).
    ><({(º>

  • Why does Premiere Pro CC 2014 renders incredibly slow?

    Dear Premiere Pro experts
    I created a movie with Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2014 and I have serious performance issues when it comes to export the movie.
    The first 10% renders pretty fast and takes 1 hour. Then it takes for every additional 1% about 4 hours! (never rendered it to finish so far, 14% max so far)
    Here are some facts that might help to isolate the problem:
    Project:
    Length: 24 minutes in total, splitted into several sequences (up to 4 minutes) and arranged on a "main-sequence"
    Input: Cineform AVI files, 1080p, 59fps (I converted GoPro 3+ footage (3D!) using GoPro Studio to the Cineform format for further processing)
    Desired Output: Same as input, preserving 3D (Render 3D Intermediate)
    Effects used: Warp-Stabilizer (default settings) and Auto-Color (smoothing 1-2 sec) on almost every clip.
    Hardware / Software:
    i7-3770K @3.5 GHZ (Quadcore)
    16 GB RAM
    NVIDIA Geforce GTX 970 (also tried with a ATI Radeon R9 290X)
    Windows 8.1
    SSD for OS and programs, RAID 0 for media files and project, separate drive for rendering output.
    Then I tried to render using AME using the same settings. The whole video rendered in about 14 hours what is acceptable in my case. There problem here is that the 3D gets lost, even if I selected "Render 3D Intermediate". The picture for the left eye is the same as the one for the right eye. This is not happening when I do a direct export. But the direct export get almost stuck at around 10%.
    There is almost no difference in choosing Software-Rendering and GPU. Also, the GPU has almost no load. Premiere Pro uses the CPU for about 45% (total usage 65%) and takes up 5-9 GB of memory (total usage 65%). Disk usage at around 14b/s.
    I think there are two problems. One is that AME renders differently (no 3D) and the other is that the direct export takes way too long.
    Can someone help me with any of these problems?
    Thank you,
    Martin

    I did some additional research and found out, that the slow rendering happens with this combination:
    - Auto-Color using Temporal Smoothing
    - Render 3D Intermediate
    Without rendering the 3D intermediate, Temporal Smoothing is not a problem. And without temporal smoothing, Rendering 3D Intermediate is not a problem.
    Might this be a problem in the codec or in Premiere?

  • GPU acceleration is grayed out in Premiere and AE, but not in Media Encoder. However, rendering is slow in all 3 programs.

    It worked fine in CS6.
    Now, everytime I open a project (Pr or Ae) I get the message: This project was last used with GPU Accelerated rendering. This happens with all projects, even with those that I created in Pr/Ae CC, with GPU Accelerated rendering already disabled.
    In Media Encoder, the GPU Acceleration is not grayed out, but still if I render a premiere sequence or an ae comp via ME, its very very slow. (takes 5 hours for a video that took 20 mins in CS6)
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks, Daniel

    I think I found the problem. On the website you linked, it says:
    The following notebooks are not compatible with this tool:
    Notebooks equipped with switchable graphics
    Toshiba® notebooks
    Sony® VAIO® notebooks
    Panasonic® notebooks
    And I have a Sony VAIO.
    When searching for drivers, I only found sites like these: AMD Radeon HD 7650M drivers
    Are these legit?

  • Preview rendering Very Slow

    Hi,
    Can anyone help with Preview.app slow rendering issue for large PDF files, it is very slow after upgrading to lion. (AutoCAD drawings that are PDFed)
    Small PDF documents are fine.

    Hi Guys I work with a lot of pdf files with being a student at uni and not sure these tips might help. 
    Try an app called skim which is free it handles pdfs nicely and looks similar to the preview app. 
    Also if a pdf is slow to scroll try selecting all the pages goto file print.  Then on the bottom left hand side of the print window select pdf and then save as pdf.  I have found on some pdfs (usually the ones in black and white and look like a photo copy) using the the print save as pdf option has then allowed me to view a pdf fine in the preview app without any issues.  Hope this is useful.
    I suspect its to do with pixels per inch or dots per inch of the document.

  • Why is the rendering process slowing right down?

    Hi,
    I'm rendering a 4 minute clip of Pro Res LT files, there's a few effect on it but right now I'm only rendering the video at 1/4 quality.
    It starts rendering fine. Then starts to slow down, and by the time it gets to about 99.35%, it takes hours to render about 0.10 %, still rendering now, has been rendering over night, and is still on 99.54 %.
    Every time it renders another frame, it adds another frame onto the amount that still needs to be rendered. And the estimated amount of time left stays about the same - between 3 and 4 minutes (not true).
    I'm working on a Mac, with 4GB of RAM, but also rendering to an external hard drive that should have about 400GB free.
    Help please!
    Ashleigh

    ah! "locate" is a command you can use to search (inside Terminal,) though you should keep in mind that its database is only updated once a week by default, however, you can update it manually whenever you like, which takes a few minutes, using (in Terminal):
    sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
    actually, you could always automate that by adding this to the following file: "~/.bash_profile"
    [begin --don't include this line]
    alias locate='if [ $((`date +%s`-`eval $(stat -s /var/db/locate.database); echo $st_mtime`)) -gt 3600 ]; then echo "locate: db is too old!">/dev/stderr; sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb; fi; locate -i'
    [end --that code is all you need, and it needs to be kept together, all in one line]
    f.
    Note: if you need to create the file, (in Terminal) use:
    touch ~/.bash_profile

  • FOI theme (Oracle Maps) rendering very slow

    I sniffed the network traffic when a FOI theme is rendered on a map. I determined that for each feature of the theme a network request is sent to the server fetching the corresponding marker. Fetching markers has a big impact on the performance.
    I think that fetching the same marker for each feature is not nessary.
    Is there a way (undocumented feature or patch) to avoid this from happening?
    Thanks in advance,
    Jeroen

    Hi,
    Experienced the same issue. I would like to hear from Oracle Maps development team if they are going to do something with it because our Map with active theme is very slow (rendering of markers and also panning the map). Without active markers it's fast.
    thanks,
    Branislav

  • Why is XDCAM HD rendering so slow?

    XDCAM HD 1080i60 VBR rendering is terribly slow. I'm using an 8-core Mac Pro with 8gb of RAM, a 3x750GB internal RAID 0, and the Radeon X1900 that comes with the machine.
    XDCAM HD rendering is taking about 4x realtime to export using QT conversion. Before you ask, I HAVE to use QT conversion due to some technical limitations.
    Are there any reasons why performance is so slow? I only achieve ~5-7% faster results compared to my 4-core Mac Pro. It's quite upsetting...

    I know this probably isn't helping you any, but I feel your pain.
    I'm using a Dual Core Mac with 9 gigs of ram. I'm rendering some simple 16:9 video right now and I might as well go to Starbucks and get a cup of coffee.
    5 minutes worth of video ... taking about 25 minutes to render. grr.

  • Video rendering extreemly slow or just halts

    Being playing with video a bit since I bought a Sony RX100 III.  Other than the well known problem with Dolby audio I find that rendering of video clips in Photoshop CC is very hit or miss.  Sometimes the clip renders (very slowly if many adjustments have been made) or a rotating disc appears and nothing at all happens, task manager shows some activity but not nearly as mutch as when rendering is happening properly - the program seems to be in an infinite loop.  My Windows 8.1 machine is reasonably powerful, if I use DaVinci Resolve Lite (if you think Photoshop has a steep learning curve try Resolve!!!) then even with quite complex edits clips render at around real time (25fps).  Something is clearly wrong with the video rendering routine in Photoshop which is a pity as I only want to do the occasional bit of video editing and rendering and certainly don't want to pay for a dedicated video editing tool or invest hours of time learning Resolve (the Lite version is, amazingly, a free download).
    Am I missing something?  Do others find Photoshop video rendering flakey?  Is there a work round for this problem?

    I do not do video. However i did take a few clips with my Canon 1D Mark 4 it captures 1920x1080 frames and audio. The latgest clip I have is only like two minuets long.  Video captured is format .MOV and the files tend to be very large. 300MB+ per minute. So I thought let see what Photoshop CC 2014 does rendering it to mp4. Render seem to be threaded so the more processors  cores you have the better off your are.  I have two slow 2GH 6 core xeons in my work station soe 24 threads were used.  It took CC 2014 just under 3 minuets to rendet the video went from 733MB to 380MB around 1/2 size and bite rate the mp4 is.

  • Live text rendering is slow

    When I create a Live Text template and insert it into my Premier timeline the render time is very long.  For a :05 simple text reveal the render is over a few minutes.  If I don't use it as a template but just a dynamic link comp then the render is only 10-15 seconds.  I also find the render slows to a crawl at times but if I cycle to After Effects and back to Premier the render seems to get faster.  Not sure why.
    To avoid the rendering I tried to create a Title graphic to speed the process but it appears a mask or graduated background can't be incorporated into a background graphic inserted in Title.
    Is anyone else experiencing this?

    I find if it isn't open then the links are often lost.  I always have to open the AE project prior to loading the Premiere project.

  • After Effects Rendering REALLLY Slow!?

    So, i have a two minute clip, thats taking 3 Hours and 20 mins to download?! Heres some information that may help you help me out... :
    Today, everythings just going really slow, i have no idea why. I have cleared my Cache and everything...I don't know what to do anymore.
    Installed RAM: 7.82 GB
    Current RAM Usage: 5.55 GB
    Allowed RAM Usage: 6.32 GB
    Process ID
    Application Name
    Min Needed Memory
    Max Usable Memory
    Max Allowed Memory
    Current Memory
    Current Priority
    672
    After Effects
    0.40
    7.82
    6.32
    5.55
    1 - High

    Y'know, for the past few days you've been crying and moaning about slow render times.
    I went back & checked, and do you know how much information you've given to help us help you?  Here's the answer:  ALMOST NOTHING!  And that is despite people asking you over and over again for certain information, and you ignore it!  Do you LIKE not getting help?
    You know what we know?  You're running Win 8 and you have 8 gigs of RAM.  You're rendering a 3-minute clip, and it's taking 10 hours.  Well, lah-dee-dah.  In AE terms, you might just as well have told us you're from Japan and you have red hair.
    You want to know what we should know?  Here's a list that will get the diagnostic process going:
    The PRECISE version of AE you're using, right down to the last decimal place
    The PRECISE version of your operating system, right down to the last decimal place
    The identities of any third-part video cards
    Got any drivers for these cards?  What are their PRECISE version numbers?
    The horizontal & vertical dimensions of your comps and frame rate
    The media container (.mov, .avi, etc.) and codec(s) of the clips you're using
    Got audio clips?  wav, aiff, or something else?
    What kind of still images are in the project?  Bitmapped or vector?  What are their horizontal & vertical dimensions?  Are they RGB or CMYK?
    What kind of effects are you trying to use?
    Trying to use ray-tracing?  You shouldn't.
    Trying to use multiprocessing?  You shouldn't.
    This isn't an all-encompassing list, but it ain't bad.  So toss the people here a bone and cough up some information, okay?  Give us a fighting chance, and don't make us rely on crystal balls.

  • How do I fix CS4 from rendering very slow?

    I just swithced from CS3 to CS4. The process went well and I did not have to reinstall CS4 to access my projects; thanks to all your help.
    After installing CS4 I uninstalled CS3 then I defragged.
    Now rendering takes a very long time in CS4.
    What is the magic button I need to push to speed things up?
    I have Vista 64 bit
    8GB RAM
    6000X2 at3.1Hz processor

    Is the slow render issue happening when you open a CS3 *.prproj with Premiere CS4?  We've had many issues with CS3 projects opened with CS4.  For example, stuttering video that has blur effects applied.  I recommend you avoid doing that. Many have reported that CS3 and CS4 can peacefully co-exist on the same system. That may be your solution if you need to revisit CS3 projects.
    Then of course there is the issue of hardware specs. CS4 runs great on the new Intel i7 processors with lots of RAM...6GB+. Harm has a good article on video editing hardware specs. The only point I disagree with is on packing a full tower case full of high capacity hard drives. We have found that in many cases when one of our editing system slows to a crawl, the cause is a hard drive that has one type of issue or another. One workaround if you want to load up on internal drives is a quality hot-swappable cage that holds multiple drives. Kingwin has a model for instance that holds 4 drives and uses up only 3 DVD-sized computer case openings. There could be drive cooling issues with the Kingwin product because the included fans are small and some have claimed, "cheap".
    We use the Panasonic P2 cameras. The video looks great and the resolution is all that we need for the type of work that we do. Editing is smooth when we edit P2 on external drives connected via E-Sata. This keeps the internal drives to a minimum.
    I would take a look at the new SSDs for your system drive, and install two additional internal drives. Look at the consumer drive ratings on newegg.com.  For example, some of the Seagate 1.5's have reliability issues.

Maybe you are looking for