Reorg moving indexes... how to avoid that?

Hi Everyone,
I'm running a db reorg for some tablespaces in oracle by following Note 646681 under section IV.
The problem is that i want to reorg PSAPVOLD into PSAPVOL2D (in order to be able to drop PSAPVOLD and then rename PSAPVOL2D) the problem is that the indexes of the 2 tables inside PSAPVOLD are been moved into PSAPVOL2D (from PSAPVOLI) and i want to avoid it.
I can't find any documentation on how to prevent reorg from touching the indexes, basically i want to do the indexes later in order to keep thing tidy.
I'm using command
brspace -f tbreorg -s <reorg_tsp> -t "*" -n <new_tsp> -p <par_degree>
Any Ideas?
Regards
Juan

Hi Juan,
the easiest way would obviously be to use the user interface brspace instead of trying to figure out the command line options.
Then you can enter a different target tablespace for indexes.
You may of course as well read the documentation/notes on brspace (or just type in 'brspace -help') and figure out that there is a option like this:
[-i|-indts <tablespace>]
separate index tablespace
default: table tablespace
By the way - there's really no big point in seperating index and data tablespaces. So the 'tidyness' is just a matter of your own gusto.
regards,
Lars

Similar Messages

I'm receiving some personnal SMS (through iOS 5 imessage) on an old iphone I've already sold. How to avoid that?

Hi,
I used to have an iPhone 3GS, which I recently upgraded to iOS 5 and sold. This device doesn't have any of my personnal information inside anymore (several resets and reinstall iOS5 from an blank iTunes on a seperate computer) and doesn't have my chip inside anymore.
I am using a new smartphone (not Apple) now and when I text friends who have iPhone (with iOS 5 and iMessage), I receive some of the personnal responses on the old iPhone. It seems those messages are sent through iMessage...
How to avoid that? I sold this iPhone and I don't want the buyer to receive my personnal message + I don't want to miss them on my new phone!
Thanks for the help.
Franck.

I would suggest you read the user guide. There IS no Facetime App for the iPhone.
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf
< Edited By Host >

When I am opening photoshop elements 10 I see my desktop picture into photoshop elements 10 ans I don't know how to avoid that

when I am opening photoshop elements 10 I see my desktop picture into photoshop elements 1- and I don't know how to avoid that. Does anybody know I can get rid of that picture, so that I only see the workspace of Elements?
Thanks a lot

What I said--go to the Window menu and turn on the application frame.

How to avoid that two or more people alter the same Sales Order same time

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution.
I've already put this thread in the Business One forum and someone suggested to put it in the Business One SDK forum, as there isn't a solution in Business One itself.
So if someone can give me a direction for a solution I would be very pleased.
Best regards,
Tim

Hi Tim,
The only thing that comes close to what you want in standard SBO is Data Ownership. However, this can't stop someone editing a document that is already being edited.
You can't use stored procedures to track which document is open because the SBO_SP_TransactionNotification proc (which is the only one that you are able to customise) is triggered when a document is updated or added (or cancelled or closed) and not when the document is actually being edited in the user-interface.
You could do this by writing an addon that uses the UI API to trap events in the sales order form. In theory, a sales order is being edited if the sales order form is in Update mode (ie in order for the form to be in Update mode, the user must have selected an existing document and changed the value of at least one field). You can trap the event of the user changing a value and then log the user and document in a table. When other users try to edit the same document, you could check the table and then prevent them changing values. When the first user clicks on the update button (or cancels the update or closes the form etc etc) you can remove the lock on the document. However, I have doubts as to how robust it would be. The problem with this kind of locking solution is that you sometimes get 'stranded' locks (eg user was editing a document when their workstation crashed) and the solution can end up being more troublesome than it is worth.
Kind Regards,
Owen

How to avoid that vis written in LV7.1 automatically open in LV8.5.1

Hello,
I have newly installed LV8.5.1 which also have LV7.1 installed. I noticed that the older vis now automatically open in LV8.5.1. If I save them accidentally, I will no longer be able to execute them with the older LV version. How can I avoid that Windows associates those vis with the new LV version?
Thanks.
Peter

Hi Peter,
Unfortunately windows does not allow you to specify different executing programs between files with the same extension. The link provided above explains how if you have the older version open, it will open in that version, however once you open it in the newer version and save it, you can no longer open it in the older version. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Sappster

How to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution. So far I didn't find a standard option in Business One neither a solution in this forum.
Best regards,
Tim

Tim,
There is nothing in the application settings in Business One that could be used to prevent this. You may post this to the SDK forum as well and perhaps there is a way to achieve this through SDK.

How to avoid, that a CPD-Customer will used in Sales ORDER?

Hi,
i will avoid, that the user inserts an CPD-Customer in sales orders.
It's only in quotation allowed.
Therefore i use include MV45AFZB with following code.
FORM USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK USING US_DIALOG.
DATA: WA_KTOKD TYPE KTOKD.
IF VBAK-VBTYP <> 'B'.
SELECT SINGLE KTOKD FROM KNA1 INTO WA_KTOKD
         WHERE KUNNR = VBAK-KUNNR.
IF WA_KTOKD = 'CPD'.
    MESSAGE E010(ZZ) WITH
            'CPD-cutomer is not allowed!'.
    MOVE 'ENT1' to FCODE.
    EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
My problem is, that the user cannot chage the customer numer when error appears.
Is there another way to realize what i need, or is there a way to make the customer-Number
changeable in this case?
Hope anyone can help-
Regards, Dieter

Dieter
Have you tried using order block?
Firstly define an order blocking reason for CPDs and assign it to all relevant order types in config.
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Sales/Sales Documents/Define And Assign Reason For Blocking
And then block all CPD customers using VD05 ( there will not be many, so it shouldn't take time).
Alternately
make it a warning in the code you wrote and copy the same code as an error while saving the order using
MV45AFZZ - USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE or USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT
Hope this helps.

How to avoid that every page of a smartform is going to be printed out

Hi,
I have following problem. In my smartform I builded different pages (like a cover page, different lists etc.). The user should decide by setting parameters what lists he want to print. So if he don´t need the cover page, it should not be printed out.
Is there any way to set this up in the smartform? Right now, the printing parameters (what the user wants to print) are stored in an internal table and should be processed in the smartform. My problem is that there is no way to implement conditions on a page in a smartform.
Please let me know if somebody has a solution for this requirement.
Thanks a lot,
John Caspar
<MOVED TO CORRECT FORUM BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 15, 2009 8:49 AM

Hi Micky,
The external debugging works. Thank you very much!
And how can I reward you?

Despite checking the "Do not import suspected duplicates" box, my Lr4 still did re-import hundreds of photos. Anyone know how to avoid that?

Despite checking the "Do not import suspected duplicates"box, Lr4 still did re-import hundreds of photos from the same exact card they were imported from originally. Anyone know what I should do differently next time?

The problem with duplicate detection is that, as far as I can tell, Lightroom is using details it discovers about the file being imported (examining EXIF data and file stats) and what is already in the catalog. Unless it finds an exact match for all parameters, the file is not considered a duplicate. From my own experience, if Lightroom decides a file is a duplicate it is nearly always correct. However, when it misses, it really misses. I have not read anywhere that Lightroom is building and storing a hash count which would make the process more accurate. I also suspect that the search for duplicates is when you are importing a set of photos from one location (a memory card for example) and storing them into the same folder all the time. So, if you take a memory card and import all the photos into Folder_X and then later try and import the same photos into Folder_X again, Lightroom will catch that they are duplicates. But, if you were to import that same group of photos into Folder_Y, Lightroom will not catch it indicating the comparison is not catalog wide. I am not sure how to influence this behavior and it is not anything you did wrong or failed to do. It just is the way it is...

How to avoid that FalshPlayer use the disk C:\ for installation?

I got a new PC Clone system and for several reasons the hard
disk where I have the Windows XP is not the C:\.
When I try to install FlashPlayer version 10 always try to
install it on the C:\ (that is a card reader) and find there is no
space and then stop the installation.
I've installed a lot of other programs included Shockwave
without problems, but it seems that FlashPlayer installation
program for Firefox, doesn't identify where is the Windows systems
installed and always try to install in the disk C:\.
Is there any way to avoid it or any previous version that use
Windows XP hard disk place to install it?.
Thanks a lot.

Hi JuankaC-
Yep, C: is hardcoded into the program. You have to provide a
C: drive, a thumbdrive will do.
See the instructions at
http://www.adobe.com/go/kb406903
Also, in this forum, see the thread "Insufficient Diskspace
to Install:Wrong" by PhaineinTerra, dated 4/28/07. Read the replies
by Darren McNally (an Adobe guy).
There's another: "Firefox installation: Insufficient disk
space" by Archonion dated 2/4/09.
And another: "Do not have sufficient space" by Riula dated
9/22/08
Finally:
http://www.techtalkz.com/tips-n-tricks/
They have a thread Titled "Workaround: Adobe Flashplayer 10
installation bug for firefox......."
Doesn't look too bad. OR, if ya wanna wait... Adobe is
working on this, you could get by with your on-board IE &
Flash?
Your choice.

SSIS creates empty flat fie, how to avoid that?

I have a simple SSIS data export package - Data Flow task which takes data from db table and puts it in a flat file.
SQL Agent is used to run this SSIS data export package every 2 minutes.
Sometimes table is empty, does not have new rows that's why
1 - empty file is being created
2 - SQL Agent gave an error: The step did not generate any output. The return value was unknown. The process exit code was -1073741819. The step failed.,00:00:02,0,0,,,,0
I placed a "Execute SQL Task" step to count rows in the source table and
disable Data Flow task
if user::count==0 - this still creates an empty file.
Is there a proven workaround to use count variable and actually
disable Data Flow task and avoid creating empty flat file???
Are there any specific rules in setting up "result name" in "SQL Task" "result set" where you map Result Name and Variable Name?
Should it be column name, like "count" for select count(abc) as
count from TABLE
Thank you in advance!

Question about Precedence Constraint - should this work?
In control flow:
1st task
"Execute SQL Task" step to count rows in the source table
Next - Precedence Constraints - Expression - @[User::count]==0 (what should happen
with 2nd task if expression condition is met?)
2nd task: Data Flow which actually exports data from db and puts it into flat file.
In this scenario empty file is still being created...is there something wrong with my Precedence
Constraints - Expression - @[User::count]==0?
Brba,
Yes, there are 2 methods:
method1
Have the sql inside a execute sql task and obtain the rowcount into a variable. if the rowcount is greater than 0 then proceed to data flow task which will then execute sql
again and push data into flat file.
So you may set the precedence of the flow from Execute Sql task to Data flow task as an expression as :
@[User::Count]>0
i.e., only if its greater than zero, will the control even reach the DFT.
MEthod2
Similar method using @count variable. Have a data flow task followed by a file system task.
Inside the DFT, have the Rowcount transformation between the source and destination that would obtin rowcount into @count variable.
Now similar to above method, set precedence of the path (connnecting DFT and File System task) as expression such that @[User::Count] <=0 . So if rowcount IS zero, will reach FST - wherein you may program as DELETE FILE and select connection as flatfile
conenction manager itself.
Thanks,
Jay
<If the post was helpful mark as 'Helpful' and if the post answered your query, mark as 'Answered'>

How to avoid that some text [instructions] will be printed in PDF (forms)?

The idea is that some texts may be seen in the screen but not printed when the form is filled up.
Adobe has information on this in ECycle but could not find any reference in Acrobat X or Indesign.
It may be a solution to convert a frame text to a button and change thus its appeareance; but converting many continous texts in a form to single frames is a very dispensing task.

Place the text in a text field and set its visibility properties to "Visible, but doesn't print".
Alternatively, if the text is a part of the running text of the PDF and can't be placed in a form field, place a white form field on top of this text, and set that field's visibility to "Hidden but printable", so it would in effect hide the text underneath it when the file is printed, but will be invisible when viewed on screen.

How to avoid that Photo's made Adobe RBG will change in sRGB after processing with PE 10

Hello, I have a problem. I ake all my photo's with my Camera in adobe RGB. After processing with Photoshop Elements 10 and storage again it change in sRGB. Do you have a solution? thanks Reiny

File>Color Settings>Optimize for Print. That's the Adobe RGB setting for PSE.

How to avoid that the last column in a datagrid increase the width out of the window?

I have a datagrid with this configuraction:
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column01" Binding="{Binding Property1, Mode=OneWay}"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column02" Binding="{Binding Property2, Mode=OneWay}"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column03" Binding="{Binding Property3, Mode=OneWay}"/>
</DataGrid.Columns>
The last column is a description, so the text can be a bit large. so I would like that the width don't be wnough greater than makes the datagrid has a width out side the window.
For this, I have read that I can use Width="Auto" in all the columns and in the last column width="*", but in this case all the coloumns has a very low width so I can't read anything.
The code that I have used in this case is:
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column01" Binding="{Binding Property1, Mode=OneWay}" Width=""Auto"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column02" Binding="{Binding Property2, Mode=OneWay}" Width=""Auto"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column03" Binding="{Binding Property3, Mode=OneWay}" Width=""*"/>
</DataGrid.Columns>
I am using visual studio community edition and wpf 4.5.1.
Thank so much,

>>For this, I have read that I can use Width="Auto" in all the columns and in the last column width="*", but in this case all the coloumns has a very low width so I can't read anything.
Can't you just set an explicit width for the first two columns then?, e.g.:
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column01" Binding="{Binding Property1, Mode=OneWay}" Width="100"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column02" Binding="{Binding Property2, Mode=OneWay}" Width="100"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column03" Binding="{Binding Property3, Mode=OneWay}" Width=""*"/>
</DataGrid.Columns>
There is also a MinWidth property that you can use to prevent the columns from being to narrow:
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column01" Binding="{Binding Property1, Mode=OneWay}" Width="Auto" MinWidth="100"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column02" Binding="{Binding Property2, Mode=OneWay}" Width="Auto" MinWidth="100"/>
<DataGridTextColumn Header="Column03" Binding="{Binding Property3, Mode=OneWay}" Width=""*"/>
</DataGrid.Columns>
Hope that helps.
Please remember to mark helpful posts as answer to close your threads and then start a new thread if you have a new question.

How to avoid that my Ipod nano stop playing music each minute

My new i pod nano6th generation always stop playing musicbetween 30 sec and one minute after the launch

Your nano is pausing playback when the screen goes dark. The reason for this is that it is not detecting your headset. You may be able to hear music, but the headset jack is not inserted enough for the nano to detect that it is there (or something is blocking the connection). Here are your three options:
Insert the headset jack harder. Most folks find that this solves their problem. If you can see ANY of the silver of the plug when it is inserted, it is NOT fully inserted. You should feel and hear a "click" when it is fully inserted.
Clean out the crud in the headset port. If you have tried #1 and it just won't insert all the way, it is likely that you have crud in your headset jack. Shine a light in there. The entire inside of the jack is white, so if it looks dark down at the bottom, there is probably crud down there. You can try blowing it out or using canned air. Just understand that shoving anything else in there to clean it out will be taking your warranty into your own hands! However, I have cleaned mine out using whatever was handy and small enough to fit in there and so far so good. Your results may vary!
Take it to the Apple store. If you have really tried with 1 and 2 and it is still happening, then there might just be something up with your headset port or your headset jack. If it is the headset jack, you can look closely at that and be pretty sure if that is the problem. Try another headset to make sure. If you have worked all the way through to this point and it is still happening, it is time to take it to the Apple store.
i

Reorg moving indexes... how to avoid that?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for