Replacement check after processing escheatment

Hi-
On my ISU project, we are using an outside tool to perform the escheatment process and steps on unclaimed customer credit refund checks. The checks have to be voided after 180 days then moved to a specified GL account. One way to achieve the reclassification of the credit is to specify a GL account in the Escheatment configuration. After the checks are voided and escheated, we need the ability to issue a replacement check if the customer comes forward before the dormancy period is reached. The system allws the creation of a replacemen check but no GL entry occurs when the replacement check is created. I would have expected the configured escheatment GL account to be debited at a minimim.
I
s there anything I am missing?.
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards,
M

yes the processing mode is delete for sender communication chennal.
I have created the other test scenario to test the processing mode is delete its working for other communication chennal. and my scenario also worked upto last 2 days. i have done delta cache and also created the new communication chennal even no luck.
00:06:47 Success The message status set to DLNG.
22.04.2009 00:22:42 Success The application sent the message synchronously using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Returning to application.
22.04.2009 00:22:42 Success The message was successfully transmitted to endpoint http://SAPRtest.test.com:8047/sap/xi/engine?type=entry using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
22.04.2009 00:22:42 Success The message status set to DLVD.
22.04.2009 00:23:12 Error Attempt to delete file "abc.dat" after processing failed. Retry
Please help me to reslove this.
Thanks,
Venkat.

Similar Messages

Vendor Open Item Was Not Offset After a Replacement Check

Hi FI Guru,
We have an issue with vendor replacement check. Our vendor open item still apears in FBL1N after a replacement check is paid. We initially issued a check against a vendor invoice and we had to void that check because due to check printing problem.   The check was cancelled in FCH8. We then issued a replacement check in F110. When I displayed open items for the vendor in FBL1N, the vendor invoice still showed up. The replacement check already sent to our vendor. So we have to apply the payment to the vendor's invoice. It seems the second transaction (for the replacement check) is incomplete because I dont't think it hits our bank account.
Here are my questions:
1) Is there another transaction our user needs to offset vendor invoice?
2) If we have to fix it manually, what is the best option to offset the open vendor invoice and still be able to hit our bank account.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks!!
Reiling

Hi,
In order to change the Open Item Management for a G/L account using
ZFSEPA02 the line item total(Total of open items)for this account
should match/tally with the account balance for this account (FS10),
otherwise the open item activation will not be possible.
Unfortunately as per note 175960 you find reports RFSEPA02/ RFSEPA03
are no longer supported as of release 4.5A.
ALTHOUGH you can find a possible solution on how to tally the line items
to the balance in the NOTE 403744.
1. Active New General Ledger
         This note applies ONLY WITH RESTRICTIONS to Release ERP 2004 or ERP
         2005 with activated New General Ledger and activated document
         splitting.
         In these releases, it is not currently possible to subsequently
         activate the open item management under the specified conditions.
         The only option currently available is to set up a new account with
         open item management and to use this instead of the original
         account.
         However, it is also possible to deactivate the open item management
         using report ZFSEPA03 under the prerequisites described below.
     2. Migration to the New GL:
         If you are planning to migrate to the new General Ledger using a
         migration type that enables the use of document splitting, ensure
         that in Phase 1 and Phase 2 NO changes are make to the open item
         management. Phases 1 and 2 indicate the period between the migration
         date and the end of the actual migration (the "Migration Completed"
         indicator is set)

Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG were negative!

Dear Guys,
We are facing issue during the upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 EHP4 in pre-processing phase,
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG were negative!
Last error code set: Detected 257 errors summarizes in 'ACTUPG.ELG' Check logfiles 'ACTUPG.ELG' and 'I:\usr\sap\DV1\upg\abap\log\SAPup.ECO'
ACTUPG.ELG:
******* LIST OF ERRORS AND RETURN CODES ******* ************************************************** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INECCDIMP.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INERECRUIT.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INFICA.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INFICAX.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INFINBASIS.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016ININSURANC.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INISM.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INISOIL.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INISPSCA.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60016INISUT.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60017INECCDIMP.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ETP111 exit code : "8" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-60017INERECRUIT.DV1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
......... Please help us to resolve the problem.
Regards,
Bharathi

Hi Bharathi,
Can you please provide the contents of the activation log SAPA-60016INECCDIMP.DV1 which provides the information about the error.
Please check the activation log SAPAAA*.DV1 to know which tables are not activated.
Thank You.
Regards,
Deepika

Could not archieve file after processing error in Rwb of sender adapter

Till today afternoon it is running fine.
The rpocess here is we will keep the files in FTP site. and pi polls and places the files in NFS Mount server AL11(FILE/STAGING).
Now these file will be process from FILE/STAGING to FILE/PROCESS in al11 .
Then proxy get trigerred and sends the data to sap where workflow will be trigerred.
now the issues file is getting polled from ftp and placed in file/staging folder perfectly.
Then the file needs to be moved to file/process folder using file adapter. here the issue is coming
error is as shown below
Time Stamp Message ID Explanation
Could not archive file '/FILE/Staging/20100517112845_140011140001.tif' after processing
com.sap.aii.af.service.util.transaction.api.TxManagerException: Unable to commit transaction: The transaction has been rolled back: com.sap.engine.services.ts.transaction.TxRollbackException
I had done the cache refresh still the problem persists.

HI,
1. check whether you have authorization for write access.
2. Check the path provided for process.
3. Ensure both the staging and the process paths are different.
Thanks,

Installing EHP4 on ERP 6.0: Checks after Phase SHD_RUN/ACT_UPG were negativ

hi
I'm installing the EHP4 on an ERP 6.0 System and get the following error:
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG were negative!
Last error code set: Unresolved requests in buffer EH4 Check logfiles 'ACTUPG.ELG' and 'C:\usr\sap\EH4\upg\abap\log\SAPehpi.ECO'
Here is a part of SAPEhpi.EH4:
SAPehpi> Starting subprocess tp.exe with id 5208 at 20090727150713
EXECUTING C:\usr\sap\EH4\upg\abap\exe\tp.exe pf=C:\usr\sap\EH4\upg\abap\bin\ACTUPG.TPP put EH4
Environment: JAVA_HOME=C:\j2sdk1.4.2_16-x64
Environment: PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.MSC
Environment: Path=C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\j2sdk1.4.2_16-x64\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\DTS\Binn\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\100\DTS\Binn\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\PrivateAssemblies\;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\usr\sap\EH4\DVEBMGS00\exe
Environment: dbs_mss_schema=eh4
This is C:\usr\sap\EH4\upg\abap\exe\tp.exe version 372.04.65 (release 701, unicode enabled)
Warning: Parameter INTERRUPT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter DAYLIGHT_SHUTDOWN is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter WITH_TACOB is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter IMPDP_BY_EVENT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter INTERRUPT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter DAYLIGHT_SHUTDOWN is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter WITH_TACOB is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter IMPDP_BY_EVENT is no longer used.
Looking for effective putsteps ... ... ready (looking for putsteps)
stopping on error 12 during DD ACTIVATION
tp returncode summary:
TOOLS: Highest return code of single steps was: 12
WARNS: Highest tp internal warning was: 0118
tp finished with return code: 12
meaning:
A tool used by tp aborted
ERROR: stopping on error 12 during DD ACTIVATION
Process with ID 17820 terminated with status 12
Part of ACTUPG.EH4:
DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-40401INEAIPPE.EH4
1 ETP111 exit code           : "12"
DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPA-603DDINEAAPPL.EH4
1 ETP111 exit code           : "12"
I applied the note 1306559 but it didn't help.
someone has an idea?
thank you

now i got some data from the shadow instance
JOB:
RDDMASGL                            DDIC         Canceled
JOB LOG:
Job started
Step 001 started (program RDDMASGL, variant IMPACTMRG, user ID DDIC)
Start of mass activation 10:37:39
ABAP/4 processor: TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY
Job cancelled
Runtime Error Short Text
    No roll storage space of length 638992 available for internal storage.
Error Analysis
Error analysis
    The internal table "\FUNCTION=DD_MASS_ACT_C3\DATA=DEPTAB" could not be enlarged
     further.
    Memory location: "Session memory"
    You attempted to extend the data structure for the management of the
    memory blocks for table "\FUNCTION=DD_MASS_ACT_C3\DATA=DEPTAB". However, the
     638992 bytes required for
    this were no longer available in the specified memory area.
    The amount of memory requested is no longer available.
should i also apply the note 1306559 in the shadow instance?
thx
Edited by: Joachim Knittl on Jul 29, 2009 3:30 PM

Could not archive file after processing.

All,
I'm doing simple File-File sceanario.I'm using NFS.But I'm getting the following error in sender communication channel monitoring.
Error: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.transaction.api.TxManagerException: Unable to commit transaction: The transaction has been rolled back: com.sap.engine.services.ts.transaction.TxRollbackException
Could not archive file "sample.txt" after processing
Note: The folder has full rights of read/write.
Can some one please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks.

Hi Michal,
Thanks for the quick reply.I'm seeing this error in Production environment.So i cannot try as you suggested.
It was working until yesterday .I checked with BASIS team aswell for the folder access , Everything is OK .
Is there any other way i can check to resolve this?
Thanks

After processing sender file is not deleting

Hi All,
I have configured the File-JDBC-File sync mode. the scenario is working fine upto last 2 days. but the problem is once the file picks and process its not deleting or archiving the file. but scenaio is working fine when i check in sxmb_moni but the error in sender file adaptor.
Could not delete file 'abc.dat' after processing: java.net.SocketException: Broken pipe.
in FTP server i have delete rights the other test scenario are working fine with out any error.
Please help me to reslove this issue.
Thanks,
Venkat

yes the processing mode is delete for sender communication chennal.
I have created the other test scenario to test the processing mode is delete its working for other communication chennal. and my scenario also worked upto last 2 days. i have done delta cache and also created the new communication chennal even no luck.
00:06:47 Success The message status set to DLNG.
22.04.2009 00:22:42 Success The application sent the message synchronously using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Returning to application.
22.04.2009 00:22:42 Success The message was successfully transmitted to endpoint http://SAPRtest.test.com:8047/sap/xi/engine?type=entry using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
22.04.2009 00:22:42 Success The message status set to DLVD.
22.04.2009 00:23:12 Error Attempt to delete file "abc.dat" after processing failed. Retry
Please help me to reslove this.
Thanks,
Venkat.

Failed to delete file after processing FTP

Failed to delete file after processing. The FTP server returned the following error message: 'com.sap.ai i.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx: 550 Unexpected reply code *.txt: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. '. For details, contact your FTP server vendor.
I got this error many times for the same interface. Not sure what is the reason for this.
Searched on internet go comments that this is because of FTP version!
Please help

It is the "Msecs to Wait Before Modification Check" in the Sender Adapter that ensures this. It works like this: PI starts processing, finds a file, then waits the number of miliseconds specified and checks the file again to see if it has changed over the waiting period. If so, then it waits again to make sure the file is written completely. Only if no changes took place over the waiting period, it starts processing the file.
And the fact that your file was successfully processed at retry only confirms that it might have been still written to by the sender system. You can try comparing file's creation timestamp (in OS level) with its processing start time in PI - this could prove me right.
Edited by: Grzegorz Glowacki on Jan 13, 2012 2:15 PM

Why won't new version 4.0 open on my desktop while version3.6.17 works fine. When I check the processes running on the computer the firefox is running but it won't open on the desktop(monitor)

When I updated firefox from version 3.6.16 to 4.0 the program would not open on the desktop after I double-clicked the short cut on the desk top. I checked the processes running on the computer and it showed firefox running. I followed the short cut to its file and clicked on the executable file with the same result(it won't open). I went back to the previous version and it works fine. What could be the problem?

Hey djclark24,
Have you tried starting Firefox in Safe Mode? Hold down "shift" while Firefox is starting up. If the crash doesn't happen in Safe Mode, you should read [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]].
There is also a lot of useful stuff in the [[Firefox crashes]] Knowledge Base article.
You could also try [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Managing-profiles?s=create+a+new+profile&r=2&e=es&as=s#w_creating-a-profile Creating a new profile].
Hopefully this helps!

Messages in Xi is less than the messages in R/3 server after processing.

Hi Experts
I have a scenario file - Idoc.
XI picks up the file from FTP process it and sends to the R/3 server.
Now I have a problem is when I check the Data in XI using IDX5 or SXMB_MONI the no of messages in xi is less than the messages in R/3 server.
I am checking the data of the last day like 8th May from 00:00:00 to 23:59:59 in both the cases.
In R/3 I check using BD87 t code.
Thanx

Hi Divyesh
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Ya I am also doing exactly the same . But the problem is that I am checking for yesterday datas.
In idx5 I get total of 2625 messages for orders.
When I check the same on BD87 i get 2636 messages with status 53 & 1 message with status 51.
Difference is of 11.
Now the question in how is it possible that it is picking 2625 data from FTP and after processing its sending 2637 data on R/3 server.
Thanx

Files no longer default to SRGB after processing

I still have the ICC profile box checked when ave a Jpeg after processing.
Noticed that there was a bit of color shift on some images viewed on my web site in firefox----
checked the color space---unassigned!! That usually only happened the check box inadvertantly
was not checked. Now it doesn't save in sRGB unless I assign a profile under the edit menu--not sure that is a good thing to do
or not. Wonder how to restore it so the check-box on saving a Jpeg works again.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Mike

usher999 wrote:
I'll have to figure out an expand ed color gamut workflow for some prints later.Thanks so much!!!
You're welcome. Just watch your histograms to make sure you don't clip color channels when converting directly to sRGB.
For wide-gamut work I convert to ProPhoto RGB. For combinational stuff, for example where I need a print and web image, I (try to) remember to do Edit - Convert to Profile before saving as a web preview requiring sRGB. I created an action that embodies the conversion and "bends" the colors at the gamut edges so that the conversion to sRGB doesn't clip color channels. Finally, I keep a quick photo viewer (IrfanView) on hand set to do no color management, so I'll be able to see in a quick preview visually if I forgot to convert the image to use the sRGB profile.
-Noel

Checks to be escheated

u2018Statusu2019 of checks after pulled for unclaimed property reporting. Can we establish an (E)scheated status? Does SAP have any functionality for handling checks that need to be escheated?
I know the checks can be voided and then using FB05 the open items can be transferred to the appropriate state authority. However our unclaimed property director does not want to void the checks but wants to reclassify the checks to an esheatable status.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
Alicia

Alicia-
I dont think standard SAP has any functionality for escheatment of checks. I remember seeing something that oil and gas specific sap solutions has escheatment functionality though. Maybe you define a void reason code in FCHV for escheatment and post journal entries to transfer balances.
Shail

How check Integration process

Hi friends
I have scenario like when ever maintenance order is created and released an event will trigger function module to post the details to PI to start the Integration Process.
We created Maintenance order in IW31 and released from IW32.
after this i am not able to find messages in SXMB_MONI and I am not able to see in SXMB_MONI_BPE
how to check Integration Process working or not. Please guide me

Hi
you need to put breaakpoint in your FM to see if FM is being triggered and the value are getting inserted into the tables/structure of FM

Checklist to check after SP upgrade

Hi Experts,
We are planning a system upgrade from SP15 to SP27 very soon.
Is there any kind of check-list which can provide us the options to check after post-upgrade of the system?
Any kind of help/ documents/links related with checklist would be helpfull.
Note that the current version being used is BI 7.0
Regards,
Arpit
Edited by: apkmnp on Mar 8, 2012 11:58 AM
Edited by: apkmnp on Mar 8, 2012 11:59 AM

Hi,
The basic checklist for a SP upgrade would contain tasks like below
Before Upgrade:
-check if the objects are active.
-initialize the deltas
After Upgrade:
-create a infopackage/dso/cube etc
-run the delta DTPs
-run the full DTPs
-run the delta InfoPackage
-run the full InfoPackage
-run the APDs
-execute the queries in RSRT
-execute the process chain
-edit the psa
-delete data from PSA, DSO, changelog, cube
-load data to the dso cube etc
-comress your cube
-Extract data from R3/ XI (PI) if connected or any other source system.
-load your masters
-run the attribute change run for the masters
-run your important programs
-post data in R3 and pull it to BW
-Create workbook
-create query variants
And if any critical or specific tasks you perform you would have to check those.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Joe

Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/RUN_RADTBUCACT were negative!

Hi Experts,
        I have installed ECC 6.0 system ( OS400/V7R1)and curently i am upgrading to EhP4 SP06. Right now Preprocessing- Shadow System Installation stage and got the error.
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/RUN_RADTBUCACT were negative!
Last error code set: BATCH JOB RADTBUCACT FAILED: Error(s) found in the
log(s), accumulated in "PADTBUC.ELG".
PADTBUC.ELG log
Pool adaptions for UNICODE ERRORS and RETURN CODE in RADTBUCACT.NID
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1EDDA479    Fehler bei Alter - Table Generierung für Tabelle "GLSP"
Long text:
    Cause
      This error message indicates that internal inconsistencies exist.
    System Response
    What to do
      Please consult SAP.
1EDDT066 Tabelle "GLSP" (Statements konnten nicht generiert werden)
Long text:
    Cause
      A requested database action could not be carried out.
    System Response
    What to do
      First try to repeat the action which caused this message. If the
      database action again cannot be carried out, find out the cause of the
      error using the analysis tool in the database utility. There might be
      an inconsistency between the table definition in the ABAP Dictionary
      and the existing nametab (runtime object for the table).
1EDD0319 Returncode...............: "8"
A2EEDDU 309XActivation ends with return code: "8""123341"
A trouble ticket and an archive with all relevant log files have been
generated. Trouble ticket: "/usr/sap/NID/EHPI/abap/log/SAPehpi_troubleticket.log"
I found OSS note 1449201 - Index becomes extension index: Index is deleted...And followed the manual steps. Once update the trans file and ran the report i was able to see the changes, Still i am not able to continue with the process.
Thanks.
Vel.

Hi All,
       SAP development proposed below details...
While checking your system we saw that table GLSP did not have any column defined at the database level.
Since it is a freshly installed system, I recreated the table in the database via transaction SE14.
I check the other tables process in the current phase and the other tables are consistent.
Please continue with this phase.
I am able to continue with the next phase.
Thanks.
Vel.

Replacement check after processing escheatment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for