Replacing original all in one exchange server 2010

Hello,
I currently have exchange 2010 all in one without an Edge Server. The HD is showing signs of failure so i want to move all these services to a new CAS Array and DAG. I know how to set up the DAGs but was confused about the HT and CAS roles. Currently
the all in one also has lync 2010 integration which i want to move to the new array. My question is how do i do all of this without interrupting the current setup until im ready to make the switch? Currently i have port forwarding to my exchange
server with 25 and 443 tcp ports pointing to it. I will be creating a new exchange certificate using my internal enterprise root CA to point to the new outlook.xxxxx.net. Currently my exchange cert is mail.xxxx.net with sub alternative of autodiscover.xxxx.net
and mail.xxxx.net. I dont want to mess with my current set up until im finished with this setup. i know my new cert should also have autodiscover.xxxx.net but would that mess with my current setup? Do i install the same cert on the other CAS array
member? I now i have to point to the new RPC but i will wait till the end for that. For lync integration, do i uninstall on the current all in one exchange server and install the components on both CAS array members? Do i install the HUB transport
role on both CAS Array members and point the natted ip to the CAS array(SSL 443) and (SMTP 25) virtual IP? I know this is a lot but if one of you can assist or point me to a guide i would really appreciate it.
Thanks

sorry about that. All my issues have been resolved minus one thing. So im using Zen Load Balancer on my cas array which also is part of a dag. From time to time outlook pops up a certificate warning about trust. The message varies from
time to time by listing one of my exchange servers and then the other one the next time. All i do is hit yes to accept and it disappears and outlook works fine. My exchange certificate is from my internal CA and it only list autodiscover and my
mail.xxxxx.net that points to my cas array(external facing) virtual ip. I was told my certificate does not need to have my internal mail servers name only my external which is why i think i get the certificate warning. Can you verify or provide
some guidance?
Thanks

Similar Messages

Use Different mailbox or same mailbox if setup two accepted domains in one Exchange Server 2010

Hi,
I want to know if I setup two accepted domain in one Exchange Server 2010, will it have another mailbox or use same mailbox?

Hi,
Based on my knowledge, to add a new name in the accepted domain list is to add a SMTP address suffix for the mailboxes. Thus, it uses the same mailbox if you setup two accepted domain in one Exchange Server 2010.
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Exchange server 2010 unable to send internet mails to some domains but receives mail

Hi all, I have exchange server 2010 deployed and can receive mail with no issues but cant send mails to some external domains. I can send mails to gmail some others. Yahoo! is among the domains that rejects mails originating from my exchange server. Is
there anyone to assist please?

You can start here.
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/how-to-get-removed-from-an-email-blacklist.html
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Migrate from Exchange Server 2010 sp3 to 2013 sp1

I have one Exchange Server 2010 SP3 server (300 mailboxes) installed on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 with three major roles on it (CAS, MB and HT) - typical installation. Edge Transport server is not installed thus for controlling of mail flow
Symantec Messaging Gateway Virtual Appliance is used as Smart Host. UM server is not installed either. I set up test domain environment where I installed one domain controller (Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1) and one Exchange Server 2010 SP3 (Windows
Server 2008 R2 SP1) at first place and yesterday I did everything necessary to install Exchange Server 2013 SP1 on new test virtual server running Windows Server 2012 R2 which I successfully did.
Now in test domain I have two Exchange Servers (2010 SP3 and 2013 SP1). Is there any 100% reliable documentation with all actions that had to be taken in order to successfully migrate Exchange Server 2010 SP3 to 2013 SP1? I would want to know what
needs to be done not only for my scenario but also for other scenarios (DAG, CAS array, Edge, UM, multiple HT servers . . .) since I am interested in digging deep into Exchange Server 2013.

Hi BoxiKG,
In addition to the above mentioned, and this for your reference:
Upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj898583(v=exchg.150).aspx
Best regards,
Eric

Exchange server 2010 DAG configuration

Dear Boss,
I would like to configure Exchange server 2010 with DAG . I have test lab . i would like to tell my test LAB setup .
One domain controller win-2008 X 64 Ent
Two Exchange server 2010 ( Role - Client Access, Mailbox) Each Server Two Network Cards with Different Classes
IP 192.168.44.50 , 51
IP 10.0.0.10 , 20
One Exchange server 2010 ( Role - Hub Transport )
IP 192.168.44.53
Pls tell me how can i create DAG
Note:- i would like to test below steps
1. Exchange server1 may be down or network link down how server 2 to work automatically without any disturbance
2. Exchange server2 may be down or network link down down how server 1 to work automatically without any disturbance
3. Hub transport server maybe down how it can be work ?
Regards
Subash

Hi Suriya,
To create a DAG, simply use the below commands from Exchange Management Shell:
New-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup -Name "DAGNAME" -WitnessServer HUBSERVERNAME
Add-DatabaseAvailabilityGroupServer –Identity DAGNAME -MailboxServer ExchangeServer1
Add-DatabaseAvailabilityGroupServer –Identity DAGNAME -MailboxServer ExchangeServer2
New-MailboxDatabase -Name DB1 -Server
ExchangeServer1
Add-MailboxDatabaseCopy -Identity DB1 -MailboxServer
ExchangeServer2
You can run your tests now, by restarting any of the servers, and you should be able to see the DB1 will automatically failover & failback between the nodes with out any intervention.
for the HUB transport you must have another server to achieve high availability, so you can install the HUB role on a different server or add it to one of your existing servers.
Mohammad Saeed | MCSE 2003 | MCTS: Lync, OCS, Exchange

Receive email delay one hour using Mac Mail client (Mountain Lion) connect Exchange Server 2010

Hi all,
My boss use iPhone, iPad, MacBook Air (Mac Mail client), MacPro (Mac Mail client) connect Exchange Serve 2010 to receive emails. All clients are okay except MacBook Air, the Mac Mail client cannot receive the latest emails from Exchange Server, but it can receive (sync) the emails after one hour. The other clients can receive the latest email after Exchange Server receive new emails immediately.
In this period, the MacBook Air can receive the other IMAP, POP3 and webmail from ISP normally. I tried to set 5 mins to check emails or manual check email from Exchange Server. However, the latest email still delay one hour.......... .
I dumped a screenshot for Mac Mail setting for Exchange Server and a Log file.
could anyone help me to solve this issue?
Thanks

I am not sure what the user has the check for new messages set for but mail does arrive as short as 2 minutes. It does however arrive on his iphone immediately first.

All sub-folders in Mac Mail cannot synchronize with Exchange Server 2010

Hi all,
All sub-folders under Inbox in Mac Mail cannot be synchronized with Exchange Server 2010. There are 2GB messages size in Inbox folder and 500MB messages size under Inbox's sub-folders. All messages can be sent out and received and it can work in Outlook 2007 and Outlook 2010 normally. However, all messages in sub-folders cannot be synchronized (empty sub-folders).
Does this problem relate to message synchronization order of Mac Mail with Exchange Server? Do all sub-folders messages be synchronized after synchronization complete of Inbox? The synchronization of sub-folders will not happen if the synchronization of Inbox does not complete, doesn't it?
All messages synchronization is over internet. Can anybody help?
Thanks a lot
DT1640759

Hi,
1.please check the mailbox send and receive quota for exchange 2013 migrated mailbox.
2.Please check the email attributes of the exchange 2013 migrated mailbox because it seems to be a problem with that particular mailbox.
3.Then do the message tracking and that would be the only way to find the where the send messages has gone.
4.Please check and confirm you have an enough space on the disk where exchange queue database is residing.
I think I need to create a receive connector in the 2013 to receive from 2010 ?
No need ,by design exchange 2013 cas server default frontend receive connector will be having an
entire ipv4 and ipv6 segment and anonymous connection is checked by default.
I think I also need to create a send and receive connector for 2013 users to each other?
No need , an intra organisation send connector and the default receive connectors in exchange will be used
for internal mail flow between the exchange 2013 users.
Please reply me if you have any queries .
Regards
S.Nithyanandham
Thanks S.Nithyanandham

Why the removed flag will be resumed after re-sync with MS Exchange server (2010)

Dear Sir:
     I had a big problem using Lion mail application. I like the program since it's quite simple and useful. But this problem makes me not able to work with Lion mail program continaully.
     In Lion mail, I import my office mail account which based on MS Exchange server 2010. I just found some mails (sorry I cannot fina any rule) which ever be flagged, when I try to un-flag them. The flag status will come back after re-sync with mail server. But the status doesn't happen with all mails I had. One thing I can confirm is, the "specific" mail doesn't be marked with any status after I checked them using Outlook application (both Mac Office 2011 or Windows Office 2010). Have you ever received similar feedback? Please help me to resolve this issue ASAP. Thank you.
-Joseph

When the original message is accessed using IMAP, the reply method uses the information in the
IMAP ENVELOPE to determine where to send the reply. It first looks for the Reply-To address
in the ENVELOPE, then the From address.
Interestingly, when not using IMAP, the getFrom method returns the Sender header if the From
header is empty. The IMAP-specific code doesn't do that, although perhaps it should.
It would be interesting to compare the ENVELOPE data from the protocol trace in the two cases.
The ENVELOPE data will follow this syntax:
envelope     = "(" env-date SP env-subject SP env-from SP
          env-sender SP env-reply-to SP env-to SP env-cc SP
          env-bcc SP env-in-reply-to SP env-message-id ")"
So it's the first three address fields after the Subject that are relevant. If the From and Reply-To
fields are NIL, but the Sender field has a valid address, let me know. I should probably fix the
IMAP provider to fall back to the Sender field if the From field is missing.

Exchange Server 2010 Backup and Restore

Hai,
I have Exchange server 2010 stand alone server combined with mailbox, hub and cas role. i dont have backup application program. I want to take my exchange database backup to my SAN storage automatically everyday...
Using windows server backup i can take full backup only and i can schedule it to happen daily.. Is it possible can i take incremental backup??????????for exchange 2010 database.
Thanks Chandru CT. MCITP

You have two basic options to backup Exchange 2010, VSS snapshots and "native backup" (meaning a Lag copy). As far as VSS backups go, there are three components; the VSS Writer, the VSS Provider, and the VSS Requestor. The Writer is built into
Exchange. In fact in Exchange 2010 there are two - the Exchange VSS Writer and the Exchange VSS Replica Writer. The provider can be a software VSS provider such as the Microsoft Shadow Copy provider or a hardware provider (usually supplied by your
SAN vendor. The requestor is what you would tend to think of as the backup application; it coordinates activities between the Writer and the Provider.
As far as the Exchange 2010 plugin for Windows backup goes, it a very minimal requestor. It only supports the Exchange 2010 VSS Writer, not the Replica Writer. This means you can only take backups of the Active copy of a database. The requirement
to backup the entire "volume" in the windows sense, or partition to the rest of us is a function of the way VSS works and is no real surprise. In fact, another limitation of VSS is that the logs and database need to be on seperate volumes: see
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832794.aspx.
That it only takes full backups makes sense as well. Shadow copies, like many software providers and many hardware providers out there are copy on write. Initially, after the first one that is, they take up minimal space for some metadata.
As data is writen to the volume while the the snapshot is in place, the original blocks are evacuated to a "difference area" and the write is then written to the newly evacul\ated spot. You can generally put the difference area on the same volume or
somewhere else. The downside is to write a block while a copy on write snapshot is in place means a read and two writes for every write. This gets ugly on RAID 5 which already has a write penalty of 4; that turns into 9 IOs for every write while
the copy on write snapshot is in place. Since you can't do the snapshots on the replica because the replica writer isn't supported, that IO hit is on the active copy. When using copy on write snapshots, you generally want as few around as possible
for as short a time as possible; usually just long enough to export or copy the snapshot to another set of spindles. I really wouldn't want to use WSB plugin for Exchange 2010 in anything but the smallest deployments.
What about native backup? Well then you take a 100% space hit for every lag copy. In addition, restoring a LAG is a one shot deal. As you strive with the LAG to match what you could achieve with even daily or weekly copy on write snapshots,
the number of database copies, and Exchange mailbox servers, poliferates. You may want to consider a "Happy medium" that combines a LAG for fault tolerance/protection against logical corruption with copy on write snapshots (replicated or copied
to seperate storage) for HA. Perhaps DPM would be worth a look in your situation.
You did mention that you have a SAN. Most SAN vendors offer hardware VSS Providers. Many are copy on write, and you shift that set of problems to the, albeit likey a bit more performant SAN, Some vendors use other stratagies. The vendor
I work for uses allocate on write, so it avoids the 3 IOs per write copy on write penalty while a snapshot is in place. This means you can snapshot frequently and keep many of them around without penalty shortening your RPO and RTO. They optionally
archive truncated logs allowing for "up to the minute" restore of older snapshots, not just the last one. They also provide a proprietery version of RAID 6, called RAID DP that outperforms RAID 1. Combine that with all the storage efficiency features
like dedupe of primary storage, thin provisioning, compression, etc., that can all be combined and it starts to get compelling as the size of your deployment increases. Although I might be a bit biased when it comes to SAN vendors, if your SAN is someone
other than NetApp I still encourage you to talk with your SAN vendor and see what features/functionality they offer that can help you address your backup needs for Exchange 2010. I think you'll find much to like; it really comes down to scale and a cost/benefit
analysis.
If you decide that hardware VSS providers are not you thing and want to stay with a software vss provider, I encorage you to talk to the usual backup software vendors as well. Many can integrate with DAS and/or SAN, and have their own software
VSS providers often including support for the Exchange 2010 replica writer. This at a minimum allows you to snapshot passive copies. Features like replication (to get the changed blocks to other storage or off site), tape support (to roll backups
off to tape potentially to store off site) and catalogs come to mind as very useful things to have.
I'd take a look around at what's available and see if any of the things offered meet your business needs at a price you can afford to pay. The WSB Plug-in is a bare bones sort of thing, and it only gets better from there.
J

Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard "Certificate Authority Service" / Exchange Server 2010 EMC not starting and no AD connectivity for authentication.

Hello,
I am a new IT Manager at this company and need assistance big time. Their environment looks as follows:
Server 1. Domain Controller Server (Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard) running active directory.
Server 2. Email Server (Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard) running Exchange Server 2010 .
* Note. No back ups to work with aside from whats mentioned below.
DC had a virus infection causing a lot of issues on the shared network drives 2 days ago locking up all the files with a crypto ransom virus. Running Avast suppressed the infection. Had to recover the file shares which luckily had a back up.
The issue is that the Exchange Server 2 post this lost connectivity with the AD Server 1. Exchange Server 2 when launching EMC could not launch the console stating the following:
"No Exchange servers are available in any Active Directory sites. You can’t connect to remote
Powershell on a computer that only has the Management Tools role installed."
Shortly after I found that it is possible the EMC launcher was corrupt and needed to be reinstalled following another blog post. I deleted the exchange management console.msc per instructions only to discover I couldnt relaunch it because there was
no way how. So I copied another msc file that happened to be on the DC Server 1 back to Exchange Server 2 and got it to launch again.
Another post said that it might be an issue with the Domain Account for the Computer, so to delete it in the AD Server 1 only to find that rejoining it from Exchange Server 2 using Computer>Properties> Chage Settings > Change is greyed out because
it is using the Certificate Authority Service.
I tried manually re-adding the computer in AD and modeling permissions after another server in group settings but no go. After this I was unable to login to the Exchange Server 2 with domain accounts but only local admin, receiving the following Alert:
"The Trust Relationship between this workstation and primary domain failed."
I tried running the Power Shell tools on Exchange Server 2 to rejoing and to reset passwords for domain accounts as noted in some other blogs but no luck as the Server 2 could not make the connection with Server1 or other errors it kept spitting out.
I also during the investigation found the DNS settings were all altered on both the Server 1 and Server 2 which I luckily was able to change back to original because of inventorying it in the beginning when I started.
I need help figuring out if I need to rejoin the Exchange Server 2 manually by disabling the Certificate Authority Service (or removing the CA as listed here:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/fb23deab-0a12-410d-946c-517d5aea7fae/windows-server-2008-r2-with-certificate-authority-service-to-rejoin-domain?forum=winserversecurity
and getting exchange server to launch again. (Mind you I am relatively fresh to server managing) Please help E-Mail has been down for a whole day now!
Marty

I recommend that you open a ticket with Microsoft Support before you break things more.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Cannot install exchange server 2010 without small business server 2011

we purchased Windows Small Business server 2011 for one of our servers and installed the software and setup exchange server for the office. We had some 3rd party software that would not work with small business server so we had to install windows
2008 r2 server. we still need exchange server 2010. Is there anyway to install without small business server? When I entered the key in exchange server for the small business server it is saying that it is an invalid key. We have a
genuine version of windows small business server. is it all or nothing for the software. Thanks

SBS is indeed all or nothing. Breaking apart the individual components is not allowed. That includes exchange. If you want exchange without SBS, you'll need to buy exchange separately and exchange CALs. If you only have SBS CALs and aren't going to run
SBS, you'll need Windows CALs as well.

Exchange Server 2010: Undeliverable Message

Dear All,
We are using exchange server 2010 to send a email to a client, however, we got this message back. How can i solve this problem?
Thanks for your attention and help!
次の受信者またはグループへの配信に失敗しました:
[email protected] 受信者の電子メールプロバイダーによって拒否されたため、メッセージを配信できませんでした。
メッセージは次の組織に拒否されました。BL2FFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com。
管理者向けの診断情報:
生成サーバー: xxxx.com
[email protected] BL2FFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com #<BL2FFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com #5.7.0 smtp;550 5.7.0 Relay Access Denied> #SMTP#
元のメッセージヘッダー:
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.241)
by exch.xxxx.com (192.168.10.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.210.2; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:36:47 -0700
Received: from BN1AFFO11FD049.protection.gbl (10.58.52.31) by
BN1AFFO11HUB044.protection.gbl (10.58.52.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 15.0.1049.20; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:44 +0000
Received: from mgcserv4.magsaysay.com.ph (203.167.92.249) by
BN1AFFO11FD049.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.53.64) with Microsoft SMTP
Server id 15.0.1049.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:43
+0000
Received: from Crystal ([203.167.92.232]) by
mgcserv4.magsaysay.com.ph (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3) with ESMTP id
2014102013364607-10992 ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:46 +0800
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.54])
by magsaysay.com.ph ([203.167.92.232]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service
7.0; TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) id 26975997000186d5 ; Mon, 20 Oct
2014 13:40:58 +0800
Received: from BL2FFO11FD041.protection.gbl (10.173.160.33) by
BL2FFO11HUB022.protection.gbl (10.173.161.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 15.0.1049.20; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:36 +0000
Received: from mail.xxxx.com (216.81.51.170) by
BL2FFO11FD041.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.137) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1039.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Oct 2014
05:36:36 +0000
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.236)
by exch.xxxx.com (192.168.10.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.210.2; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:36:28 -0700
Received: from BY2FFO11FD056.protection.gbl (10.1.14.33) by
BY2FFO11HUB055.protection.gbl (10.1.14.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 15.0.1039.16; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:15 +0000
Received: from mailgate.zzz.com (14.16.28.51) by
BY2FFO11FD056.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.15.193) with Microsoft SMTP
Server id 15.0.1049.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:13
+0000
X-AuditID: c0a81e07-b7f5e6d000000b4e-4d-54449f4b6588
Received: from UNER2.zzz.com (unr2.zzz.com
[192.168.30.13]) by mailgate.zzz.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with
SMTP id CA.40.02894.B4F94445; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:11 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from UN2.zzz.com ([::1]) by UNR2.zzz.com
([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:11 +0800
From: Yukihiro <[email protected]>
To: Simonu <[email protected]>, Charles
<[email protected]>
CC: Miln <[email protected]>, FSA
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: unia s maual / MV Kett Iand
Thread-Topic: unaa sh ml / MVlettsland
Thread-Index: Ac/sEV9D2LsdkU5fRkW0Rd1v4PsvSQAFlzIA
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D06AC01C.21F27%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509
x-originating-ip: [192.168.30.123]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVyYIUcr673fJcQg8bHChbzDrexW/R3vGG2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Return-Path: [email protected]
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 2
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:14.1.28.51;CTRY:HK;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(428002)(189002)(66654002)(199003)(252514010)(76176999)(21056001)(71186001)(31966008)(106466001)(81156004)(77096002)(95666004)(54356999)(105586002)(4396001)(50986999)(15975445006)(86362001)(83506001)(107046002)(84326002)(19617315012)(36756003)(85852003)(53416004)(92726001)(15974865002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(44976005)(101416001)(16236675004)(92566001)(87836001)(85306004)(99396003)(2656002)(46102003)(120916001)(15202345003)(20776003)(30436002)(512874002);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB055;H:mailgate.zzzz.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:014168051.static.ctinets.com;MX:1;A:0;LANG:en;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;UriScan:;UriScan:;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: zzz.com does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 203.167.92.249)
[email protected];
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
X-Matching-Connectors: 130582569966280204;(42405700-fa69-4020-a9c4-08d0e394d333);()
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:216.81.51.170;CTRY:CA;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(428002)(199003)(66654002)(252514010)(189002)(81156004)(106466001)(76176999)(54356999)(36756003)(77096002)(101416001)(53416004)(50986999)(105586002)(95666004)(31966008)(46102003)(20776003)(30436002)(19580395003)(4396001)(44976005)(19580405001)(16236675004)(6806004)(21056001)(71186001)(15974865002)(15202345003)(99396003)(84326002)(120916001)(15975445006)(83506001)(92726001)(92566001)(85852003)(86362001)(2656002)(87936001)(85306004)(107046002)(512874002)(19617315012);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB022;H:mail.xxx.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:216.81.51.170.epikip.net;A:0;MX:1;LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB022;UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 03706074BC
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mgcserv4/mgc(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at
10/20/2014 01:36:46 PM,
Serialize by Router on mgcserv4/mgc(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 10/20/2014
01:36:47 PM,
Serialize complete at 10/20/2014 01:36:47 PM
X-TNEFEvaluated: 1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_D06AC01C21F27hzzzcom_"
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:203.167.92.249;CTRY:PH;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(428002)(252514010)(189002)(66654002)(199003)(76176999)(54356999)(86362001)(15974865002)(50986999)(85852003)(92566001)(92726001)(19617315012)(512874002)(46102003)(85306004)(97736003)(99396003)(120916001)(33186001)(53416004)(44976005)(105586002)(19580405001)(106466001)(16236675004)(77096002)(81156004)(19580395003)(95666004)(31966008)(71186001)(107046002)(21056001)(101416001)(15202345003)(84676001)(68736004)(30436002)(87836001)(2656002)(20776003)(4396001)(6806004)(84326002)(83506001)(15975445006)(36756003)(72026002);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB044;H:mgcserv4.magsaysay.com.ph;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:ErrorRetry;MX:1;A:0;LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB044;

Hi Shiloh,
According to your description, my understanding is that you send a message to external user(@xxx.com) fail.
Before going further, I'd like to ask the following question to narrow down the issue:
1. Could you send message to any other external user except xxx.com? like google.com,outlook.com.
2. Try to disable or bypass Transport Scanning in Forefront Protection 2010 and check if any helps.
You can refer to the following article to disable or bypass FPE:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/407.how-to-disable-or-bypass-transport-scanning-in-forefront-protection-2010-for-exchange-server-fpe.aspx
Best regards,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Exchange server 2010 mail limitation

Hi,
We have exchange server 2010 cashub1 and cashub2
and also we have edge1 and edge2.
my requirement is, i want all the exchange user to set limit of internal and external as 10 MB, except just 5 to 10 user we need to set limit as 50MB.
Can you please assist and provide the step by step configuration to setup the requirements.
Thanks in advance.

Does that 50MB limit apply to messages to and from the internet as well?
If so, then here is an example of one way to do this:
I would set all the limits to 50MB including the organizational limits.
Then create a hub transport rule that rejects any message with an attachment over 10MB with a rejection message and code of your choosing except when to and from a Group that you create that contains those 5-10 users who need to send messages as large as
50MB.
and, as always, test this very well before implementing!
More info:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124345(v=exchg.141).aspx
Understanding Message Size Limits
Twitter!:
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Exchange Server 2010 OWA Error 405 StaticFileModule

I am running Exchange Server 2010
(Version 14.1 - Build 218.15) on Windows Server 2008 R2. This is a all-in-one-server roles installation. Everything is working fine except forms-based authentication. When enabled I get HTTP Error 405.0 "Method not allowed". The page
you are looking for cannot be displayed because an invalid method (HTTP verb) is being used.
Details are:
Module StaticFileModule
Notification ExecuteRequestHandler
Handler StaticFile
Error Code 0x80070001
Requested URL https://localhost:443/owa/auth/owaauth.dll
Physical Path C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\ClientAccess\owa\auth\owaauth.dll
Logon Method Basic
Logon User administrator
When in EMC, Client Access, on OWA & ECP tabs I change authentication forms-based to standard with basic check box and restart IIS the Web Access works fine.
I have already tested solutions like recreating Virtual Directories, Allow .Net 2.0, etc. I have also checked all the modules and the associated mappings in IIS one by one for every VM. I believe this is an error in a .config file. If you have encountered
a situation like this please help.

Hi Pantelis,
Please make sure that the client sends a request that contains a valid HTTP method.
1. Click Start, type Notepad in the Start Search box, right-click
Notepad, and then click Run as administrator.
Note If you are prompted for an administrator password or for a confirmation, type the password, or provide confirmation.
2. On the File menu, click Open. In the
File name box, type %windir%\system32\inetsrv\config\applicationhost.config, and then click
Open.
3. In the ApplicationHost.config file, locate the <handlers> tag.
4. Make sure that all the handlers use valid HTTP methods.
5. Save the ApplicationHost.config file.
More details to see: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942051
Please also try to re-build OWA Virtural Directory. To see:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941201
Thanks
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Problems installing Mailbox role on Exchange Server 2010 SP3

I am in the process of installing Exchange Server 2010 SP3 on a Windows Server 2012 server in order to migrate our existing Exchange 2003 server. Everything went well with the installation process until I went to add the Mailbox server role, which is giving
me the following error (from the log file):
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0090] [1] Executing:
$wevtutil= join-path (join-path $env:SystemRoot system32) wevtutil.exe;
$manifestPath = [System.IO.Path]::Combine($RoleInstallPath, "Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man");
Start-SetupProcess -Name:"$wevtutil" -Args:"im `"$manifestPath`" "
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0105] [2] Active Directory session settings for 'Start-SetupProcess' are: View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'TAM-FS2.tacomaartmuseum.org', Preferred Global Catalog: 'TAM-FS2.tacomaartmuseum.org', Preferred Domain
Controllers: '{ TAM-FS2.tacomaartmuseum.org }'
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0105] [2] Beginning processing Start-SetupProcess -Name:'C:\Windows\system32\wevtutil.exe' -Args:'im "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man" '
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0276] [2] Starting: C:\Windows\system32\wevtutil.exe with arguments: im "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man"
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0344] [2] Process standard output:
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0344] [2] Process standard error: The value for channel property Type contains an invalid value. The parameter is incorrect.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0347] [2] [ERROR] Unexpected Error
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0347] [2] [ERROR] Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0350] [2] Ending processing Start-SetupProcess
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0350] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0350] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0350] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.TaskException: Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0351] [1] [ERROR] The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
$wevtutil= join-path (join-path $env:SystemRoot system32) wevtutil.exe;
$manifestPath = [System.IO.Path]::Combine($RoleInstallPath, "Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man");
Start-SetupProcess -Name:"$wevtutil" -Args:"im `"$manifestPath`" "
" was run: "Process execution failed with exit code 87.".
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0351] [1] [ERROR] Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0351] [1] [ERROR-REFERENCE] Id=MailboxComponent___13A8A6B7DE0A4fe3BEB5CB1D86105DA3 Component=EXCHANGE14:\Current\Release\PIM Storage\Content Indexing
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0351] [1] Setup is stopping now because of one or more critical errors.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0351] [1] Finished executing component tasks.
[05/03/2013 21:58:09.0393] [1] Ending processing Install-MailboxRole
I've searched all over but can't seem to find any reference to "exit code 87" - does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Matt

Error 87 -with these details below - and a fix. The situation that got me here by the way was an incomplete install that was uninstalled, then installed again.
[02/24/2014 06:49:06.0967] [2] Active Directory session settings for 'Start-SetupProcess' are: View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', Preferred Global Catalog: 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', Preferred Domain Controllers:
'{ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx }'
[02/24/2014 06:49:06.0967] [2] Beginning processing Start-SetupProcess -Name:'C:\Windows\system32\wevtutil.exe' -Args:'im "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man" '
[02/24/2014 06:49:06.0967] [2] Starting: C:\Windows\system32\wevtutil.exe with arguments: im "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man"
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [2] Process standard output:
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [2] Process standard error: The value for channel property Type contains an invalid value. The parameter is incorrect.
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [2] [ERROR] Unexpected Error
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [2] [ERROR] Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [2] Ending processing Start-SetupProcess
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0592] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.TaskException: Process execution failed with exit code 87.
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0608] [1] [ERROR] The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
          $wevtutil= join-path (join-path $env:SystemRoot system32) wevtutil.exe;
          $manifestPath = [System.IO.Path]::Combine($RoleInstallPath, "Scripts\TSCrimsonManifest.man");
          Start-SetupProcess -Name:"$wevtutil" -Args:"im `"$manifestPath`" "
        " was run: "Process execution failed with exit code 87.".
[02/24/2014 06:49:07.0608] [1] [ERROR] Process execution failed with exit code 87.
I found I could fix this by removing the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Microsoft-Exchange-Troubleshooters/Operational
and everything underneath it.
My guess is that wevtutil didn't like adding an event log where it already existed but was slightly different in setup (no idea how, exactly).
After 24 hours I'll try post again - giving things time to make sure they are actually working.

Replacing original all in one exchange server 2010

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for