Report a bug, if this problem is not solved, p2p of rtmfp will not be of much use

Question

Recently, we have several clients on a p2p application, but we use the development version to test, two-way voice and video connection is not successful, several customers of the network environment is as follows:
First of all, there is no firewall;
These networks have in common is:
After an optical access, the subnet with a lot of routers, one by one, and some series, some parallel, some in series and then parallel, and some in parallel then in series, in short, they can be online, and then not the same segment of the computer, p2p connection is not successful, and other computer connection is not successful, and some also use the vpn.
Analogy: 192.168.5.10 and 192.168.10.10 to connect not, 192.168.5.10 and 192.168.5.11 is ok, is 192.168.5.10 may be outside the network of other computers can connect to, but 192.168.10.10 possible and other computers outside the network connections are not.
Hope you solve this problem as soon as possible, because rtmfp too expensive, otherwise p2p applications, are generally large companies (schools, government) affordable, and their networks are very complex, they do not take, you will no client .
My English is not very good, google translation
I gave you a bug report so long, how did not care for me ah;
This forum nobody, or you did not test this bug, you do not have time to correct this bug;
Either we modify not the flash player platform to the bottom of things, I will not give you advice.
In fact, standing on a technical point of view to think that I have is to use a socket network communication can be OK, network barrier, it is not.
But would like the user's perspective, I can be normal to the Internet, other p2p communications software, I can, on this thing, impossible, it is this software not work, so that this bug is that we must solve the .
I am very concerned about this issue every day and came to see nobody replies, I think this problem, I think, to solve this problem, you can proceed in two ways:
1.dns
I think it may be able to solve this problem, dynamic dns,
The idea is: to allow users to connect to the server, the user computer first upd listener (that is, iis services), then farid + domain to form a secondary domain name server dynamically to resolve the domain name to the user's computer, in a timely manner to refresh dns.
In this way, the user's computer, there is a fixed identity.
2 gateway
From users within the LAN to solve this problem, it can only proceed from the gateway.
For example, to use arp and other means to get to the router, where each segment ip then ip, similar to the route command to specify more than one gateway to the user's computer may be able to solve this problem.
In theory, these two methods may be feasible.
We also expect a new solution, I do not know Daoxing not
Speak before this program, take a look at our test for RTMFP p2p network topology, and the test results (explain, test, do not open the firewall and router are not set up static routing).
Computer A, computer B - "router A -" server S
The above NetConnection.Connect.Success 95% NetStream.Connect.Success 5% NetStream.Connect.Fail
Computer A - "Router A - servers S" - routers B - Computer B
Above, NetConnection.Connect.Success, NetStream.Connect.Success
Computer A - "Router A - servers S" - router B - routers C - Computer B
Above, NetConnection.Connect.Success, 50% NetStream.Connect.Success 50% NetStream.Connect.Fail
(Computer A - Router A, computer B) - router B - server S
Above NetConnection.Connect.Success, 100% NetStream.Connect.Fail
Computer A - "Router A -" router B - server S "- Router C" - router D "- computer B
Above NetConnection.Connect.Success, 100% NetStream.Connect.Fail
Computer A - "Router A -" Router B - "Router C -" server S "- Router D" - Router E "- computer B
Above NetConnection.Connect.Success, 100% NetStream.Connect.Fail
See the above test results, is not very bad, the key is FMS4.5 sell 450,000 RMB in China, their own software does not do a good job, but also to sell such a high price in China, a man named QQ. The above test environment, all 100% NetConnection.Connect.Success 100% NetStream.Connect.Success, free, QQ has more than 100 million users, QQ companies rely on advertising to make money game.
Seems to digress, huh, huh.
The test results, 100% NetConnection.Connect.Success, and NetStream.Connect.Fail the main reason is because the route connected in series or more than two or two and then caused.
From a technical perspective, as a packet travels through a number of the NAT router default all packets can be out, new packets can not be into the second layer of the router caused.
Find the reason, we think of a countermeasure to solve this problem from the software itself.
The last case of the above test environment, for example:
When computer A and server S NetConnection.Connect.Success computer B with the server the S NetConnection.Connect.Success, computer A to Router D sends an upd packets, not because the router can only broadcast the data packet to computer B, so 100 % NetStream.Connect.Fail.
The 100% NetConnection.Connect.Success, if we can NetStream.Connect, and NetConnection.Connect connected together, is not can be 100% NetStream.Connect.Success?
In other words, no matter what circumstances, computer A and computer B can and server S connection is successful, the other way round, that is, the server S and the Computer A or Computer B can connect.
We can not let the computer A or computer B, pretending to server S (In theory, called NAT, technically speaking, is to modify the source ip of the packet header and source Mac server S, and parity), the router not in the NAT, and other communications.

Answer 1

Hi Mr. Wog,
My guess is that once you see an estimate for replacement for hundreds of dollars, those scratches won't look too bad anymore. There are products to cover the outer casing, and some people put stickers on, or even paint (I don't recommend either, but ymmv). Good luck.