Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

Hello Gurus,
Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
Thanks
RG

Hi Raghu,
After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
You will be able to get the comparison...
Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
Srikanth Munnaluri

Similar Messages

  • COPA Costing key for actual cost component split

    Hi,
    I would like to allow the users to specify different period/year in the following screen every month when they do the COPA revaluation. However i noticed this screen is part of customization and cannot be changed by the users without a transport. As such how can we allow the users to change the period/year by themselves every month?

    Hi Sanjay Ram,
    Whatever the marked one i.e. period/year is used especially when you want to consider the PUP or actual cost the material for that specific period only. As you know it can not be changed in every period.
    So, for that purpose only we have the above one i.e. period a/c to line item, by this system is going to pick the PUP or actual cost of the specific period for which the line item has taken place (the line item that may be billing or settlement)
    Regards..
    Jose

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • Actual Cost component split - Per PO

    Dear ML Experts,
    We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
    But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts).  Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
    Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
    Can you please provide your advice?
    Thanks,
    Balram

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

  • Need to de-activate Actual cost component split

    Hi All,
    I need to de-activate Actual cost component split in the test client.
    It has been activated by my testing associate by mistake.
    Please let me know the do and donts if anyone has done this de-activation before.
    I could not find any relevent OSS messages or consulting notes on this topic
    We are using ML Actual Costing and Multi Currency  - without actual cost component split.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Vik Sood

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

  • Raw Material Costing with Actual Cost Component Split

    Hi All
    I have requirement to split inventory RM Value with material component and Freight cost, all config done and looks well if I check at CKM3N cost component view, material cost $100 and Freight $20, I GR the inventory with freight cost, since I'm using actual costing when journal freight cost go to Price Difference account. But after actual costing closing why the system can't split the variance update to freight cost component? is this the standard SAP behaviour?
    Please help for the solution
    Regards
    Luiz

    I see that you want to split your material cost and freight cost. you need to check the following:
    Is your current standard cost estimate support this structure i.e do you have seperate cost components for RM and Freight.
    If not first you need to change cost component structure and as mentioned by owen you to map the purchase condition type to the origin group and cost component structure.
    Then system will do the same for the actual costing

  • Report Painter/Writer Ctr & WBS costs

    I think I've tried every possible variation to bring the appropriate CTR/WBS costs. Here's what I'm trying to do:
    1. See in one reprt both the CTR planned costs and the WBS planned costs where the cost center is assigned to the WBS as a responsible CTR.
    2. Added the characteristic "Import CTR Data" into either a row or general data selection as well as adding object types WBS, ACT, PRJ, and CTR.
    3. I can get the WBS to display as a line item with the planned costs, but when I do it changes the credit balance on the CTR to a positive value. This is after I run plan reconciliation for the CTR, and I have integrated planning turned on.
    Example:
    Postings:
    WBS Labor CE: $100
    CTR Labor CE: -$300
    Report:
    Total CTR LAbor balalnce $100
    WBS displayed with $100.
    When I remove the WBS and Import CTR Data i get the $-300 balance on the CTR. So I'm guessing it's not possible to bring these two objects into the same report to show the CTR over/inder absorption with WBS visibility.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Jim

    Cost center...that's the abbrev. used in report painter. As an update the problem seems to stem from the fact that I've added the WBS charateristic to the line and exploded it. when I do this I lose the credits to the cost center. Any idea?

  • Actual Cost Component Split Datasource

    Hello all,
    Did anyone work with 0CO_PC_ACT_10.
    I am using 0CO_PC_ACT_10 datasource to feed Infocube 0COPC_C07, we have loaded data period wise and based on actual costing run and we are validating data with ECC using CKM3.
    My aim is to get for category ending inventory (EB). Single level price differences and quantity is matching with CKM3 values but multi level price differences are not matching.
    I have tried searching in SDN and related sap notes but couldnu2019t find anything appropriate.
    Kindly assist and please let me know if you need anything more.
    Thanks,
    Rakesh

    Hi Rakesh , 
    The datasource 0CO_PC_ACT_10 uses the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA to extract its data .
    And in the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA,
    i could locate these tables - ckmlhd and  ckmlmv011 .
    So you can check these tables for your information .
    You can also have a look at this :
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/a2e338d96cd84fe10000000a11405a/frameset.htm]
    Thanks ,
    Lokesh

  • Material Ledger Active - K088 Settlement doesnt use Actual Cost Comp Split

    Production Order quantities are all scrap (in confirmation) thus order balance contains Consumed Materials and Activity Allocation
    When KO88 Settlement is run, the system uses Standard Cost Component Split to allocate the residual to Cost Components instead of the Actual Cost Component Split
    When we run the flow trace, the message says:
    "Splitting according to output material S-Price CCS"
    Expectation was that costs would flow according to Actual Cost Component split.
    There is note 756167 - This note activates the update of the actual cost component split information in the material ledger document when you perform the order settlements.
    However current release is 604, so its expected that this is already applied.
    Any help or insight on how to settle using Actual Cost Component split is appreciated.
    Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:57 PM
    Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:59 PM

    The second option you mentioned of using separate value field for transferring the standard cost component split from the actual cost component split is the way SAP designed this integration between CO-PA and the Material Ledger.  But 40 value field for cost component split is excessive.  CO-PA allows up to 120 value fields maximum, so I agree it does not seem prudent to use 80 of them for this purpose.
    I suggest you reexamine the level of detail you think may be needed in CO-PA and try to use CO-PC reports at the cost element level to report on more detail.  Keep the CO-PA view more aggregated and you can stick with the standard solution for comparing standard to actual costs in CO-PA.
    Best regards,
    Jeffrey Holdeman

  • Activating Cost Component Split

    Hi People,
    I have to do some tests and for while i need to activate the "cost component split" in the path:
    \IMG\ Controlling\ Product Cost Controlling \ Actual Costing/Material Ledger \ Actual Costing \ Activate Actual Cost Component Split  (by valuation area)
    I would like to know if there is some impacts for that and
    if we have some problems to revert, becuase at this moment it is only a test.
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

    Hello Paul,
    Thanks for your answer.
    We already use "material ledgder" but we don´t have activate component split. But look, what I am talkin is only one transaction (that I said before), becuase I have to do some test inside the aplication BW and it is a prerequisite.
    I would like to know what is the impact to activate the component split on that transaction I said before.
    It is only a test, but I don´t know if I put a flag in that transaction, the system will create some table internally.
    And other thing I don´t know is, if It it is possible to reverte the activation (only in that transaction) that I would update and if there is some impacts.
    Thanks a lot.

  • Change Analyze cost component split CK80_99 or CK13N.

    HI experts,
    How or where can i change report CK80_99 or CK13N? I don´t know which is it report? I need some summarization row to this report, for example:
    Cost component split:
    10 raw material
    20 wraps
    10-20 material in sum - Summarization
    30 wages
    40 overhead
    10-40 production costs - sumarization
    Thanks a lot, for Your help.
    Gustavo

    Hi,
    CK13N transaction allows you to see information of standard costs in below formts.
    1.Cost itemisation-cost of each item which is responsible for standard cost and summation of all elements in last row.
    2.Cost component-these are configured cost sets based on local cost reporting method.
    3.Costing level with cost component-This replica of your BOM structure with additional information cost for each level.
    Your issue is realated with #2 in the above list.
    I hope following steps will help you to get that information,
    In CK13 transaction call the cost component report.Download this report into excel format and sum up as per your requirement.
    or else if you want configure existing cost components under expected groups in cost component config.
    Hope this helps you.
    Ashok

  • Report Painter / Writer  creation

    Dear SAP gurus,
    pl let me know how to create Report Painter /Writer for PS reports. Wud like to know step by step process or process flow
    thanx in advance
    regards
    Srihari

    EXACTLY ps I DON'T HAVE, but please follow the links you will get the idea.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/5b/d2342943c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/56/32e339b62b3011e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/erpfi/report+painter

  • Reference to note 434873 - Auxiliary cost component split

    1) We use material ledger. We already have a primary cost component split defined in our system.
    2) We want to activate an auxiliary cost component split.
    3) We read the note 434873, paragraph 2)b) (activating an auxiliary cost component split).
    4) Who can assist us to develop the customer-specific Z program that is referenced in the note?

    Hi to Evrybody,
    I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
    1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning!  Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
    2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
    3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
    I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
    Best Regards,
    Georgi Georgiev

  • Material Ledger: Cost Component Split (Elements) table CKMLKEPH

    Hi All,
    Whats the use of this table, what information get updated in this table while creating invoice.
    Message was edited by:
            Alexander

    Hi Alexander,
    CKMLKEPH belongs to material ledgers actual cost component split database:
    Differences from Actual Costs to Standard Price
    Entries per material, update, cost element structure, kind of difference and level
    Created per any update where occur differences
    so if ML is active with actual CCS and your invoice has a price diference than CKMLKEPH will store the split of the price difference posting.
    it is related to CKMLKEV.
    this note gives some further links
    <a href="https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=398941&_NLANG=E">Note 398941 - INFORMATION: CO-PC-ACT (Data structures)</a>
    best regards,
                         Udo

  • Auxiliary cost component splitting issue in CK11N

    Hi Friends,
    We are using primary cost component split for the auxiliary cost component structure for getting more information.  We have a machine cost in the main cost component which is split in three auxiliary cost component i.e. Energy, Maintenance and depreciation. 
    My belief is that with the activation of primary cost component split the costs have to flow from cost center in its primary cost element form to this cost component structure.
    With the current data that we have, the cost component split is seen for all the three cost elements in the auxiliary cost component split u2013 But we are not able to trace the source of this amount as we do not have any splitting structure in place, the plan costs are only for Energy not for Maintenance and depreciation.
    OKES Configuration:
    Selection for assignment:
    Cost Element               GMACHINE (only for Energy)
    Activity Type     MACH
    Splitting rules:
    10                                        21     Equivalence Numbers Planning
    Machine 0.64 is splitting into as follows Depreciation 0.41, Energy 0.12 and Maintenance 0.11
    I am afraid from where splitting happening for Energy and depreciation and there is not receiving   splitting rules.
    Appreciate for quick reply
    Thanks
    Govind

    Hi to Evrybody,
    I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
    1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning!  Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
    2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
    3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
    I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
    Best Regards,
    Georgi Georgiev

Maybe you are looking for

  • EDI 870 - Order Status Report

    Hi, I would like to know the Message type and basic type for EDI 870 (Outbound). In what instance it is triggered. Should i create an abap report ?? Thanks in advance...

  • Error in outbox folder

    Today, when I send emails I receive an 'Error' message that says: This message could not be delivered and will remain in your Outbox until it can be delivered. The sender address [email protected] was rejected by the server This seem to happen when I

  • Redundancy: ¿Does each context need to be included in a FT-group?

    Hello team: My apologies in advance for the following basic questions. I am new to the ACE architecture and still a little bit lost in this arena. Question 1: I built a "FT-group 1" for the Admin context, and wondered if I need to build a different F

  • How to extend Article to Different Sales organization

    Hi experts How to extend Article to Different Sales organization thanks in advance

  • Temporary Solution for screen flicker r9 280x

    After performing various tests I've fixed the screen flickering on my msi r9 280x, I hope this can be useful for all here with the same problem and with different patterns of R9 family, that I have running on my pc and I have not had even the slighte