Report rdf with size 8mb taking more time to open

Hello All,
I have a rdf ( reports 6i) report with size 8.5mb taking more time to open and more time to access each field.
Please let me know how do i solve this issue.
Please do the needful.
Thanks.

Thanks for immediate response.
pls let me know how do i know this.
Right now i have the below details from report->help
Report Builder 6.0.8.11.3
ORACLE Server Release 8.0.6.0.0
Oracle Procedure Builder 6.0.8.11.0
Oracle ORACLE PL/SQL V8.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle CORE Version 4.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle Tools Integration Services 6.0.8.10.2
Oracle Tools Common Area 6.0.5.32.1
Oracle Toolkit 2 for Windows 32-bit platforms 6.0.5.35.0
Resource Object Store 6.0.5.0.1
Oracle Help 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Sqlmgr 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Query Builder 6.0.7.0.0 - Production
PL/SQL Editor (c) WinMain Software (www.winmain.com), v1.0 (Production)
Oracle ZRC 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Express 6.0.8.3.5
Oracle XML Parser 1.0.2.1.0 Production
Oracle Virtual Graphics System 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Image 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Multimedia Widget 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Tools GUI Utilities 6.0.5.35.0
Thanks
Edited by: Abdul Khan on Jan 26, 2010 11:54 PM

Similar Messages

Issue with background job--taking more time

Hi,
We have a custom program which runs as the background job. It runs every 2 hours.
Itu2019s taking more time than expected on ECC6 SR2 & SR3 on Oracle 10.2.0.4. We found that it taking more time while executing native SQL on DBA_EXTENTS. When we tried to fetch less number of records from DBA_EXTENTS, it works fine.
But we need the program to fetch all the records.
But it works fine on ECC5 on 10.2.0.2 & 10.2.0.4.
Here is the SQL statement:
EXEC SQL PERFORMING SAP_GET_EXT_PERF.
SELECT OWNER, SEGMENT_NAME, PARTITION_NAME,
         SEGMENT_TYPE, TABLESPACE_NAME,
         EXTENT_ID, FILE_ID, BLOCK_ID, BYTES
   FROM SYS.DBA_EXTENTS
   WHERE OWNER LIKE 'SAP%'
   INTO
   : EXTENTS_TBL-OWNER, :EXTENTS_TBL-SEGMENT_NAME,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-PARTITION_NAME,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-SEGMENT_TYPE , :EXTENTS_TBL-TABLESPACE_NAME,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-EXTENT_ID, :EXTENTS_TBL-FILE_ID,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-BLOCK_ID, :EXTENTS_TBL-BYTES
ENDEXEC.
Can somebody suggest what has to be done?
Has something changed in SAP7 (wrt background job etc) or do we need to fine tune the SQL statement?
Regards,
Vivdha

Hi,
there was an issue with LMT's but that was fixed in 10.2.0.4
besides missing system statistics:
But WHY do you collect every 2 hours this information? The dba_extents view is based on really heavy used system tables.
Normally , you would start queries of this type against dba_extents ie. to identify corrupt blocks and such:
SELECT owner , segment_name , segment_type
        FROM dba_extents
       WHERE file_id = &AFN
         AND &BLOCKNO BETWEEN block_id AND block_id + blocks -1
Not sure what you want to achieve with it.
There are monitoring tools (OEM ?) around that may cover your needs.
Bye
yk

ESR & IR taking more time to open

Hi,
Enterprise Service Builder and Integration Directory taking more time.
Please help us to tune the necessary parameters or steps to follow to speed up the open time in ESR and ID?
Regards,
Kumar

But in development it take more than 30 minities
In quality it take more than 15 minities
Why the difference b/t to open ESR/ID in dev and quality system?
And also my internet connectivity very fast,it is 5mbps.
Is any way to speed up the open time of ESR/ID?
Regards,
Kumar

SAP B1 2005PL38 client on Windows 7 taking more time to open

i have SAP B1 2005 PL38 on Windows server 2003 and SQL 2005. I added one stem of windows 7 OS, and installed SAP client. Now it is taking more than normal time to open or any process. what could be the reason. Pl help

Hi,
As per sap,
Microsoft Windows 7-Professional, Enterprise & Ultimate Edition(-32 Bit / 64 Bit) is planned to be supported only for 2007A,2007B and 8.8
Support of Windows 7 with the SAP Business One 2007 release track is planned to be provided as of Q1/2010.
For SAP Business One 8.8, support of Windows 7 is planned to be provided in Q2/2010.
Kindly check the product availability for in the sap portal for more information.
Hope this is helpful!

Dataloading taking more time from PSA to infocube through DTP

Hi All,
when i am loading data to infocube through PSA with DTP, it taking more time. Its taken already 4 days to load. Irrespective of the data the previous loads were completed in 2-3 hrs. This is the first time am facing this issue.
Note: There is a start routine written in Transformations
Plz let me know how to identify whether the code is written in global declaration or local. If so what is the procedure to correct.
Thanks,
Jack

Hi Jack,
To improve the performance of the data load, you can do the below:
1. Compress Old data
2. Delete and Rebuild Indexes
3. Read with binary search
4. Do no use LOOP withing LOOP.
5. Check sy-subrc after read etc.
Hope this helps you.
-Vikram

RDF report taking more time to complete

Hi All,
Our custom RDF report is taking more time to complete.
Acutally on early hours of the login day, when i submit that request it completes in 5-6 min, but when i resubmit that request that is going on running.
Please do help in this.

Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please enable trace and generate the TKPROF file -- https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Concurrent+AND+Request+AND+Slow&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

Custom Report taking more time to complete Normat

Hi All,
Custom report(Aging Report) in oracle is taking more time to complete Normal.
In one instance, the same report is taking 5 min and the other instance this is taking 40-50 min to complete.
We have enabled the trace and checked the trace file, but all the queries are working fine.
Could you please suggest me regarding this issue.
Thanks in advance!!

TKPROF: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Tue Jun 5 10:49:32 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
Error in CREATE TABLE of EXPLAIN PLAN table: APPS.prof$plan_table
ORA-00922: missing or invalid option
parse error offset: 1049
EXPLAIN PLAN option disabled.
SELECT DISTINCT OU.ORGANIZATION_ID , OU.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
FROM
HR_OPERATING_UNITS OU WHERE OU.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID =:B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
total 3 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
3 HASH UNIQUE (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=52023 us cost=10 size=66 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=61722 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=20 pr=11 pw=0 time=61672 us cost=9 size=66 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=18 pr=11 pw=0 time=61591 us cost=7 size=37 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=16 pr=11 pw=0 time=61531 us cost=7 size=30 card=1)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=11 pr=9 pw=0 time=37751 us cost=6 size=22 card=1)
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK1 (cr=1 pr=1 pw=0 time=17135 us cost=1 size=0 card=18)(object id 43610)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS (cr=5 pr=2 pw=0 time=18820 us cost=1 size=8 card=1)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 43657)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=32 us cost=0 size=7 card=1)(object id 44020)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=52 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 330960)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=2 size=29 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 11 0.01 0.05
asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
INSERT INTO FND_LOG_MESSAGES ( ECID_ID, ECID_SEQ, CALLSTACK, ERRORSTACK,
MODULE, LOG_LEVEL, MESSAGE_TEXT, SESSION_ID, USER_ID, TIMESTAMP,
LOG_SEQUENCE, ENCODED, NODE, NODE_IP_ADDRESS, PROCESS_ID, JVM_ID, THREAD_ID,
AUDSID, DB_INSTANCE, TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID )
VALUES
( SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_ID'), SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_SEQ'),
:B16 , :B15 , SUBSTRB(:B14 ,1,255), :B13 , SUBSTRB(:B12 , 1, 4000), :B11 ,
NVL(:B10 , -1), SYSDATE, FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S.NEXTVAL, :B9 , SUBSTRB(:B8 ,1,
60), SUBSTRB(:B7 ,1,30), SUBSTRB(:B6 ,1,120), SUBSTRB(:B5 ,1,120),
SUBSTRB(:B4 ,1,120), :B3 , :B2 , :B1 ) RETURNING LOG_SEQUENCE INTO :O0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 20 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 21 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL (cr=1 pr=4 pw=0 time=36498 us)
1 SEQUENCE FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=24 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.01 0.03
SELECT MESSAGE_TEXT, MESSAGE_NUMBER, TYPE, FND_LOG_SEVERITY, CATEGORY,
SEVERITY
FROM
FND_NEW_MESSAGES M, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE :B3 = M.MESSAGE_NAME AND :B2 =
M.LANGUAGE_CODE AND :B1 = A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME AND M.APPLICATION_ID =
A.APPLICATION_ID
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
total 5 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=15724 us cost=3 size=134 card=1)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=20 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_NEW_MESSAGES (cr=4 pr=2 pw=0 time=15693 us cost=2 size=125 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_NEW_MESSAGES_PK (cr=3 pr=1 pw=0 time=6386 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 34367)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.00 0.03
DELETE FROM MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 DELETE MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=4 pr=3 pw=0 time=29161 us)
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=3 pr=2 pw=0 time=18165 us cost=2 size=13 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 3 0.01 0.02
SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
begin Fnd_Concurrent.Init_Request; end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
declare X0rv BOOLEAN; begin X0rv := FND_INSTALLATION.GET(:APPL_ID,
:DEP_APPL_ID, :STATUS, :INDUSTRY); :X0 := sys.diutil.bool_to_int(X0rv);
end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 8 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 8 0.00 0.00
begin fnd_global.bless_next_init('FND_PERMIT_0000');
fnd_global.initialize(:session_id, :user_id, :resp_id, :resp_appl_id,
:security_group_id, :site_id, :login_id, :conc_login_id, :prog_appl_id,
:conc_program_id, :conc_request_id, :conc_priority_request, :form_id,
:form_application_id, :conc_process_id, :conc_queue_id, :queue_appl_id,
:server_id); fnd_profile.put('ORG_ID', :org_id);
fnd_profile.put('MFG_ORGANIZATION_ID', :mfg_org_id);
fnd_profile.put('MFG_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID', :coa);
fnd_profile.put('APPS_MAINTENANCE_MODE', :amm); end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
SELECT FPI.STATUS, FPI.INDUSTRY, FPI.PRODUCT_VERSION, FOU.ORACLE_USERNAME,
FPI.TABLESPACE, FPI.INDEX_TABLESPACE, FPI.TEMPORARY_TABLESPACE,
FPI.SIZING_FACTOR
FROM
FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS FPI, FND_ORACLE_USERID FOU, FND_APPLICATION FA
WHERE FPI.APPLICATION_ID = FA.APPLICATION_ID AND FPI.ORACLE_ID =
FOU.ORACLE_ID AND FA.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
total 4 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=89 us)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=93 us cost=4 size=76 card=1)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=5 pr=0 pw=0 time=77 us cost=3 size=67 card=1)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=19 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=51 us cost=2 size=58 card=1)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=27 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 22583)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_ORACLE_USERID_U1 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 22597)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_ORACLE_USERID (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
SELECT P.PID, P.SPID, AUDSID, PROCESS, SUBSTR(USERENV('LANGUAGE'), INSTR(
USERENV('LANGUAGE'), '.') + 1)
FROM
V$SESSION S, V$PROCESS P WHERE P.ADDR = S.PADDR AND S.AUDSID =
USERENV('SESSIONID')
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
total 3 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1883 us cost=1 size=108 card=2)
1 HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1869 us cost=1 size=100 card=2)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1059 us cost=0 size=58 card=2)
182 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSLWT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=285 us cost=0 size=1288 card=161)
1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSUSE (ind:1) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=617 us cost=0 size=21 card=1)
181 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSUPR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=187 us cost=0 size=10500 card=500)
1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSLED (ind:2) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=4 us cost=0 size=4 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 6 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 6 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 4
Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
total 13 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 5
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 37 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 37 1.21 2.19
log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 49 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 89 0.01 0.07 7 38 336 24
Fetch 29 0.00 0.09 15 168 0 27
total 167 0.02 0.16 22 206 336 51
Misses in library cache during parse: 3
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
asynch descriptor resize 6 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 22 0.01 0.14
48 user SQL statements in session.
1 internal SQL statements in session.
49 SQL statements in session.
0 statements EXPLAINed in this session.
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
1 session in tracefile.
48 user SQL statements in trace file.
1 internal SQL statements in trace file.
49 SQL statements in trace file.
48 unique SQL statements in trace file.
928 lines in trace file.
1338833753 elapsed seconds in trace file.

XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD

HI
XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD.
The sql has 5 union clauses.
It takes 20-30 minutes in TOAD compared to running through Concurrent Program in XML Publisher in EBS taking around 4-5 hours.
The Scalable Flag at report level is turned on with the JVM options set to -Xmx1024m -Xmx1024m in Concurrent Program definition.
Other configurations for Data Template like XSLT, Scalable, Optimization are turned on though didn't bounce the OPP Server for these to take effect as I am not sure whether it is needed.
Thanks in advance for your help.

But the question is that how come it is working in TOAD and takes only 15-20 minutes?
with initialization of session ?
what about sqlplus ?
Do I have to set up the the temp directory for the XML Publisher report to make it faster?
look at
R12: Troubleshooting Known XML Publisher and E-Business Suite (EBS) Integration Issues (Doc ID 1410160.1)
BI Publisher - Troubleshooting Oracle Business Intelligence (XML) Publisher For The Oracle E-Business Suite (Doc ID 364547.1)

Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

Hi All,
I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
The problem,
Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
tableB.setID(bean.getID);
tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
Thanks & Regards
VB

Hello,
Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
Best Regards,
Chris

Query accessing SSAS cube is taking more time in power view report

Hi,
My SSAS server is having 16 Core's . I have created a power view in sharepoint site, which is accessing ssas cube.
The report is taking more time to show the result. I traced the DAX query using SQL Server profiler. When I ran this DAX query in SSAS server directly, then its taking less time but when the same query running from sharepoint server (power view) , it
is taking more time. Number of records in the fact table is 300M .
Also i tracked the %process time in performance monitor, mostly the line is below 20%. I think the CPU is not fully utilized..
Could you please help me to improve the performance of my report.
Regards,
Arun

Hi Arun,
According to your description, you create a PowerView report in SharePoint site connect to SSAS cube, the problem is that it take long time to show the result in the report, now you want to improve report performance, right?
In your scenario, you said that it takes more time to return the result in PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. For a report, its run time contain retrieval data time and render report time. So it takes more time to return the result in
PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. And there are 300M records in the fact table, the performance can be caused by large data. Here is a blog which describes tracks down Power View performance problems.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2013/07/29/tracking-down-power-view-performance-problems.aspx
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Currency translation taking more time at first time in the report

Hi All,
Here is an issue regarding the currency translation in the report. when we click on the currency translation from the contaxt menu on the report, its taking more time for the first time to get the selection options. But it is fast from the second time onwards. It will be not user friendly if its takes more time for the first time. Is there any way to fast up the processing time for the first time when i go for the "currency translation" option at report level for the first time.
let me know why it takes more time for the first time when we go for this option at report level.
Thanks,
Jack

Once again from the top.
This is undoubtedly not a database issue.
I doubt you can fix it in the database.
You can, however, spend a lot of hours asking questions and poking around if you are a consultant paid by the hour.
But as long as you are looking for something to do here are some that won't fix the problem but may be worth a few minutes of your time.
WHERE 1 = 1Are you kidding? Drop this nonsense. The Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. If it were my database I would also drop the parallel hint like a bad habit.
/*+ parallel(rp1, 8) */Again the Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. Ask for parallel threads that don't exist and the database will just queue your SQL and let it sit there until sufficient resources become available.

SSRS report taking more time but fast in SSMS

SSRS report taking more time but fast in SSMS,We are binding a string which more than 43000 length each and total number records is 4000.
Plese do the needful.It is not possible to create index because it crosses 900 byte.

Hi DBA5,
As per my understanding, when previewing the report, there are three options to affect the report performance. They are data retrieval time, processing time, rendering time.
The data retrieval takes time to retrieve the data from the server using a queries or stored procedures, the processing time takes time to process the data within the report using the operations in the layout of the report and the rendering time takes time
to display the information of the report and how it is displayed like excel, pdf, html formats. It is the reason why report take more time than in SSMS.
To improve the performance, we need to improve the three aspects. For the details, please see the great blog:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mariae/archive/2009/04/16/quick-tips-for-monitoring-and-improving-performance-in-reporting-services.aspx
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Heidi Duan
Heidi Duan
TechNet Community Support

Taking more time to save report or prompt

Hi All,
When am saving report or prompt taking more time. When i tried to keep filter on Business Month column in report and when i click on All Choices in Filter to select particular value it is taking nearly 50 sec to get the values, hardly it contains 100 values in Business Month column. Please can any body let me know why this is taking more time to retrive the data in filter,saving report and prompt.
Any suggestions/help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Rajkumar.

Hi Rajkumar.
Is the source for your prompt a fact table or a dimensional table? Do you have indexes on the column in the database?
regards
John
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/

Report taking more time to execute

Hi,
I Have created a report on " 0FIGL_O02 " General Ledger: Line Items(DSO)
This report is creates for document details . so using this report i want to creat
jump report. But When i am running the report it is taking more tme.
variable sellections i uesed for this report.
1. company code
2.G/L Account
3.Posting date
there are no caliculations for this report. But it is taaking more time and not getting
executed.
plz sugest.
Regards,
prasad.

Hi,
Please rebuild the statistics of the ODS.
Also check the various options available below:
ODS Performance
-Vikram

Log applying service is taking more time in phy. Standby

Hi Gurus,
My Database version as follows
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
We have datagaurd setup as well - Huge archive logs are generating in our primary database - Archive logs are shipping to standby with no dealy - But applying the archive logs are taking more in our physical standby database - Can you please help me why it was taking more time to apply archivlogs (sync) in standby ? - What could be possible reasons..?
Note : Size of standby redo logs are same as redo log file of primary database - Also standy by redo one or more than online redo log primary.
I also confirmed from network guy for network issue - He said that network is good.
Please let me know if any other information required? - Since i need to report my higer leve stating this is cause for delay in applying archive logs.
Thanks

No we don't have delay option in log_archive_dest
here is alert log
edia Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42017 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:00:09 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 6 Seq 42017 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Thu Sep 19 09:00:49 2013
RFS[1]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:00:54 2013
Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
RFS[2]: Successfully opened standby log 7: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0701.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:00:58 2013
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42018 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:00:58 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 42018 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42019 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:01:08 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 7 Seq 42019 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0701.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0701.log
Thu Sep 19 09:01:08 2013
RFS[1]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:01:22 2013
Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
RFS[2]: Successfully opened standby log 6: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:01:26 2013
RFS[1]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:01:26 2013
Media Recovery Log /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/arch/ARCH1_42020_821334023.LOG
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42021 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:01:30 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 42021 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Thu Sep 19 09:01:51 2013
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42022 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:01:51 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 6 Seq 42022 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0601.log
Thu Sep 19 09:01:57 2013
Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
RFS[2]: Successfully opened standby log 5: '/xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log'
Thu Sep 19 09:02:01 2013
Media Recovery Waiting for thread 1 sequence 42023 (in transit)
Thu Sep 19 09:02:01 2013
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 42023 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /xyz/u002/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log
Mem# 1: /xyz/u200/oradata/xyz/stb_redo/redo0501.log

Report rdf with size 8mb taking more time to open

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for