Report Taking A Long Time

I have a report, that if I hard code the parameters, then it takes 5 seconds to return data.
If I use a bind variable (page item), see below, then it takes 25 seconds to return data.
select * from (
select A.ITEM_ID, 
A.VIN,
B.MAKES,
C.MODEL,
A.BFG_NO,
A.FRG_NO,
H.PERSONAL_NO,
H.SURNAME,
A.NON_BFG_REG_NO
from MER_VEHICLE_OWNERSHIPS G,
MER_IMPORTED_ITEMS A, 
MER_PERSONS H,
MER_MODELS C,
MER_MAKES B
WHERE B.MAKE_ID(+) = A.MAKE_ID
AND C.MODEL_ID(+) = A.MODEL_ID
AND G.ITEM_ID = A.ITEM_ID
AND H.PERSONAL_ID = G.PERSONAL_ID
AND NVL(H.SECURITY_ID, 2) != 1
AND G.VALID_FROM = (SELECT MAX(VALID_FROM)
                      FROM MER_VEHICLE_OWNERSHIPS
                       WHERE ITEM_ID = A.ITEM_ID) 
where (
instr(upper("VIN"),upper(nvl(:P300_SEARCH,"VIN"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("MAKES"),upper(nvl(:P300_SEARCH,"MAKES"))) > 0  or
instr(upper("MODEL"),upper(nvl(:P300_SEARCH,"MODEL"))) > 0  or
instr(upper("BFG_NO"),upper(nvl(:P300_SEARCH,"BFG_NO"))) > 0  or
instr(upper("FRG_NO"),upper(nvl(:P300_SEARCH,"FRG_NO"))) > 0  or
instr(upper("NON_BFG_REG_NO"),upper(nvl(:P300_SEARCH,"NON_BFG_REG_NO"))) > 0
)Can anyone explain why ? and how I can speed it up
Gus

I have the below code on one of the reports and it takes for ever to load the page. In Prod tier the page never returns as we have excess data. Is there a way to resolve this issue ?
select
OBJECTID,
RSDA_ID,
COUNTY,
RESIDENCY_CODE,
JURIS,
FULLSTNAME,
HWY_NUM,
LENGTH_MILES,
CAUSE_OF_RESTRICTION,
ROAD_STATUS,
REPLACE(SHIELD,' ','') SHIELD,
COMMENTS,
FC,
UPLOAD_DATE_TIME
from   GISLINK.V_ROAD_STATUS_CURRENT
Where (  :P100_COUNTY_FILTER = 'EVERYTHING'
      OR :P100_COUNTY_FILTER = COUNTY)
and
(  :P100_RESIDENCY_FILTER = 'EVERYTHING'
      OR :P100_RESIDENCY_FILTER = RESIDENCY_CODE)
and
(  :P100_FC_FILTER = 'EVERYTHING'
      OR :P100_FC_FILTER = FC)
and
to_char(ROAD_STATUS) = to_char(decode(:P100_ROAD_STATUS_FILTER,'EVERYTHING',ROAD_STATUS,:P100_ROAD_STATUS_FILTER))
and
to_char(CAUSE_OF_RESTRICTION) = to_char(decode(:P100_CAUSE_FILTER,'EVERYTHING',CAUSE_OF_RESTRICTION,:P100_CAUSE_FILTER))Edited by: Lucy Discover on Sep 6, 2011 10:56 AM
Edited by: Lucy Discover on Sep 6, 2011 10:59 AM

Similar Messages

  • Discoverer report taking too long time to open.

    HI,
    Discovere reports are taking too long time to open. Please help to resolve this.
    Regards,
    Bhatia

    What is the Dicoverer and the Application release?
    Please refer to the following links (For both Discoverer 4i and 10g). Please note that some Discoverer 4i notes also apply to Discoverer 10g.
    Note: 362851.1 - Guidelines to setup the JVM in Apps Ebusiness Suite 11i and R12
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=362851.1
    Note: 68100.1 - Discoverer Performance When Running On Oracle Applications
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=68100.1
    Note: 465234.1 - Recommended Client Java Plug-in (JVM/JRE) For Discoverer Plus 10g (10.1.2)
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=465234.1
    Note: 329674.1 - Slow Performance When Opening Plus Workbooks from Oracle 11.5.10 Applications Home Page
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=329674.1
    Note: 190326.1 - Ideas for Improving Discoverer 4i Performance in an Applications 11i Environment
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=190326.1
    Note: 331435.1 - Slow Perfomance Using Disco 4.1 Admin/Desktop in Oracle Applications Mode EUL
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=331435.1
    Note: 217669.1 - Refreshing Folders and opening workbooks is slow in Apps 11i environment
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=217669.1

  • Discoverer reports taking a long time!!!

    Hi all,
    One of our clients is complaining that the discoverer reports are taking a long time to run for the last few days, the report used to take 30 minutes before but now is running for hours!!
    I have checked the SGA and I have killed the idle sessions but still there was no improvement in the performance.
    The version of BI discoverer is 10 and database also is 10g and the platform is win server 2003.
    I have checked the forums and they talk about explain plan and tkprof and other commands, but my problem is that i am unable to find the query that discoverer is running i mean once the report is clicked the query runs and gives the estimate time it would take. can some one tell me where this query is stored so that i can check this query,
    Also there were no changes made in the query or to the database.
    The temp space fills up 100%, i increased the size of temp space but still it goes to 100% also i noticed that the CPU utilisation goes to 100%
    i also increased the SGA but still no go.
    can someone kindly help me as to what could be causing this problem
    also kindly guide me to some good documents for tuning the discoverer.
    thanks in advance,
    regards,
    Edited by: user10243788 on Jan 4, 2010 12:47 AM

    Hi,
    The fact that the report used to work fast and now not can be related to many things but my guess is that the database statistics were changed and so the explain plan has changed.
    This can be done due to change in the volume of the data that crossed a level were oracle optimizer change the behavior but it can be other things as well.
    Anyway it is not relevant since it will be easier to tune the SQL than to find what have changed.
    In order to find whether the problem is with the discoverer or in the SQL extract the SQL as described above and run it in SQL tool (SQL Plus, TOAD, SQL Developer and so on).
    The best way to get to the problem is run a trace on your session and then use the TKPROF command to translate it to a text file you can analyze - you can assist your DBA team they should have no problem doing that.
    By doing that you will get the problematic statements/ functions/ procedures that the report uses.
    From there you can start working on improving the performance.
    Performance is expertise for itself so i'm sorry i don't know to tell you where to start from, I guess the start will be from understanding the meaning of the explain plan.
    Hope I helped a little although I wish Ii had a magic answer for you
    BTW, until you resolve that problem you can use the discoverer scheduler to run the reports in the background and so the users will get the data.
    Tamir

  • Hyperion Report taking a long time to process local query

    Hi All,
    I am trying to run a report on Hyperion IR 9.3.1. I am facing a performance issue with this report. I am joining 13 tables using full outer join. Each table is having data about 900 rows and the final output i am getting from the local query is about 11000 rows. This local query is taking a long time to get process about 3 - 5 minutes. I suppose it should run with in 30 sec as number of rows are very few. Can anyone tell me what is the problem with this local query and how the performance of the report can be increased?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Ujjawal

    Be aware that XP takes approx 1gb of your RAM leaving you with 1gb for whatever else is running. MS Outlook is also a memory hog.
    To check Virtual Memory Settings:
    Control Panel -> System
    System Properties -> Advanced Tab -> Performance Settings
    Performance Options -> Adavanced Tab - Virtual Memory section
    Virtual Memory -
    what are
    * Initial Size
    * Maximum Size
    In a presentation at one of the Hyperion conferences years ago, Mark Ostroff suggested that the initial be set to the same as Max. (Max is typically 2x physical RAM)
    These changes may provide some improvement.

  • Reports taking unusually long time to load

    Gurus,
    I am using BO 4.1 SP1. I am trying to open a report  on BI launchpad. But it is taking very long time to load. This occurs even when i am trying to access the last instance. Window remains in the following state.
    I checked load on the server. But tha'ts fine. What could be the issue?

    Hi,
    Ok, that's strange because the connection server doesn't actually handle data processing.
    (that would typically be the WebiProcServer or DSL_Bridge or DF service (depending on workflow))
    My advice would be to turn off 'refresh on open',  change viewer technology to "web view" (as opposed to Java rich internet client)  and start investigating again from that baseline.
    Also, this might be indicative of a BIplatform sizing or APS configuration issue. another option: have you upped your memory allocation to the Tomcat config? 
    Regards,
    H

  • Report script taking very long time to export in ASO

    Hi All,
    My report script is taking very long time to execute and finally a message appears as timed out.
    I'm working on ASO Cubes and there are 14 dimensions for which i need to export all data for all the dimensions for only one version.
    The data is very huge and the member count in each dimension is also huge, so which is making me difficult to export the data.
    Any suggestions??
    Thanks

    Here is a link that addresses several ways to optimize your report script. I utilize report scripts for Level 0 exports in an ASO environment as well, however the majority of our dimemsions are attribute dimensions.
    These are the most effective solutions we have implemented to improve our exports via report scripts:
    1. Make sure your report script is written in the order of how the Report Extractor retrieves data.
    2. Supressing Zero and Missing Data
    3. We use the LINK command within reports for some dimensions that are really big and pull at Level 0
    4. Using Symmetric reports.
    5. Breakout the exports in multiple reports.
    However, you may also consider some additional solutions outlined in this link:
    1. The MDX optimizing commands
    2. Back end system settings
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/esb_dbag/drpoptim.htm
    I hope this helps. Maybe posting your report script would also help users to provide feedback.
    Thanks
    Edited by: ronnie on Jul 14, 2011 9:25 AM
    Edited by: ronnie on Jul 14, 2011 9:53 AM

  • Sharepoint Report is taking very long time to load

    SharePoint(2010) Report is taking very long time to load and display in first attempt but from the next attempt it loads and display result normally. It's urgent..please help how to troubleshoot ...

    Hi Kunal,
    is there multiple report viewer webpart on page? if so then SharePoint doesn't do well with multiple report viewer web parts. if possible then merge the reports in one.
    Try to implement SSRS caching/ Database snapshots for reporting services, it will help you to improve the performance:
    reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522786.aspx
    Technet article to troubleshoot report performance:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    If my contribution helps you, please click Mark As Answer on that post and
    Vote as Helpful
    Thanks, ShankarSingh(MCP)

  • Taking too long time to get LOV

    HI,
    I have created a customer folder in which the query retuns 0.5 million records.
    I have created a item class in airline_name column which is being used in the worksheet as parameter.
    The problem is it is taking too long time near about 2 min to get LOV when the user wants to search the exact name.
    Thanks,
    Himanshu Tiwari

    Hi,
    Usually, you should not use the folder that the report is based on to define the LOV. You should use a separate folder to define the LOV that is optimised to return the content of the LOV.
    Rod West

  • My external library 100 GB on a 2TB drive is taking a long time to open.

    Hey there,
    I recently moved my library to an external drive.  When I tried to load the external drive, it said it needed to repair and I let it happen overnight because it was taking a long time.
    Now it seems to just freeze when I try to load the external library.  Can someone let me know if there is something I can do to make this process speed up?  Should I move some of my projects to another library and keep it off-line?
    Thanks,
    Austin

    Could it possibly be due to videos stored in the aperture library?  I think one of the folders has multiple GB of video...  Just a thought.
    If Aperture is freezing on opening, this can be caused by corrupted or incompatible media, but it would not explain the original error message your reported - "permissions".
    When the repair finishes, try to launch Aperture with the Shift-key held down. This will defer the generation of previews. If media cannot beprocessed, Aperture will hang, when it tries to generate the previews for those images or videos. If you can get Aperture to launch after deferring the preview generation, you could open the Activity window (Window > Show Activity) and then selectively try to generate previews for your last imported images and videos  (Photos > update preview). The Activity window will show, what is currently processed, and perhaps you can spot, which of the files is causing the hang.

  • Computer still taking a long time to boot

    I have a late 2013 21.5” iMac (Model: ME087LL/A) with a 1TB hard drive (5400 rpm).  I just switch from Windows to Mac, so I tried to keep everything as simple as possible on the transfer of files.  I had only added Kaspersky Antivirus and Western Digital Tools. 
    Boot times and operation seemed normal so I transferred my music, pictures, and some files.  My computer started running slow with just one user and started taking a long time to boot.  I found that since I added about 24,000 pictures to iPhoto, the Mac was trying to send all these pictures to iCloud in the background.  I stopped using iCloud for iPhoto and that seemed to speed up the normal operation once the computer is booted. 
    The computer still seemed to take a very long time to boot.  It would now take 3 minutes to get from turning it on to being able to use Safari.  I uninstalled Kaspersky Antivirus and Western Digital Tools using each company’s uninstallers so I know they are completely off the computer. 
    Any ideas on how to get back to the fast boot time?  I am only using about 150 GBs of the 1 T drive so I don’t think that is causing the issue.  What should I expect for a boot time on a brand new Late 2013 iMac?  Or should I try to re-install Maverick and try to get a fresh start?
    Any advice would be appreciated so I don’t feel like I made the wrong choice going to Mac.  I'm kicking myself because the computer was so fast when I just got it.

    Seventy one thanks for trying to help me out.  I really appreciate it.  Log is below.  You are absolutely right. Kaspersky and WD look like they still have something (as well as google??).  Is there anything else that stands out?  How would I go about getting rid of them?  Re-Install?  Clean Re-Install?
    EtreCheck version: 1.9.12 (48)
    Report generated June 16, 2014 at 6:19:51 PM EDT
    Hardware Information:
              iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2013) (Verified)
              iMac - model: iMac14,3
              1 2.9 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 4 cores
              8 GB RAM
    Video Information:
              NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M - VRAM: 1024 MB
                        iMac 1920 x 1080
    System Software:
              OS X 10.9.3 (13D65) - Uptime: 0 days 0:8:41
    Disk Information:
              APPLE HDD HTS541010A9E662 disk0 : (1 TB)
                        EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
                        Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 999.35 GB (847.45 GB free)
                        Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
    USB Information:
              Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
                        Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
              Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
    Thunderbolt Information:
              Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper:
              Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions:
              [loaded] com.kaspersky.kext.klif (3.0.3a40) Support
              [loaded] com.kaspersky.nke (1.6.3a13) Support
    Launch Daemons:
              [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
              [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
              [loaded] com.westerndigital.ErasePrivilegedHelper.plist Support
    User Launch Agents:
              [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
    User Login Items:
              None
    Internet Plug-ins:
              SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.2 - SDK 10.6 Support
              FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 14.0.0.125 - SDK 10.6 Support
              Flash Player: Version: 14.0.0.125 - SDK 10.6 Support
              QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
              Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
    Audio Plug-ins:
              BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
              AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
              AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
              iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins:
              Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    3rd Party Preference Panes:
              Flash Player  Support
    Time Machine:
              Skip System Files: NO
              Mobile backups: OFF
              Auto backup: YES
              Volumes being backed up:
                        Macintosh HD: Disk size: 930.71 GB Disk used: 141.47 GB
              Destinations:
                        Mac Backup [Local] (Last used)
                        Total size: 2 
                        Total number of backups: 5
                        Oldest backup: 2014-06-08 00:03:53 +0000
                        Last backup: 2014-06-16 03:07:06 +0000
                        Size of backup disk: Adequate
                                  Backup size 2  > (Disk used 141.47 GB X 3)
              Time Machine details may not be accurate.
              All volumes being backed up may not be listed.
    Top Processes by CPU:
                   2%          WindowServer
                   1%          fontd
                   0%          hidd
                   0%          dpd
    Top Processes by Memory:
              98 MB          Finder
              74 MB          WindowServer
              66 MB          ocspd
              66 MB          mds_stores
              66 MB          Dock
    Virtual Memory Information:
              5.37 GB          Free RAM
              1.69 GB          Active RAM
              233 MB          Inactive RAM
              731 MB          Wired RAM
              233 MB          Page-ins
              0 B          Page-outs

  • Rank Function taking a long time to execute in SAP HANA

    Hi All,
    I have a couple of reports with rank function which is timing out/ or taking a really long time to execute, Is there any way to get the result in less time when rank functions are involved?
    the following is a sample of how the Query looks,
    SQL 1:
    select      a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over(partition by a.column1 order by sum(b.column2) asc)
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analyticview1"         b
                    join          "Table1"            a
                      on          (a.column2 = b.column3)
    group by  a.column1,
    b.column1;
    SQL 2:
    select    a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over( order by min(b.column1) asc) WJXBFS1
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analytic view2"         b
                    cross join                "Table 2"               a
    where      (a.column2  like '%a%'
    and b.column1  between 100 and 200)
    group by  a.column1,
                    b.column1
    when I visualize the execution plan,the rank function is the one taking up a longer time frame. so I executed the same SQL without the rank() or partition or order by(only with Sum() in SQL1 and Min() in SQL 2) even that took a around an hour to get the result.
    1.Does anyone have an any idea to make these queries to execute faster?
    2. Does the latency have anything to do with the rank function or could it be size of the result set?
    3. is there any workaround to implement these rank function/partition inside the Analytic view itself? if yes, will this make it give the result faster?
    Thank you for your help!!
    -Gayathri

    Krishna,
    I tried both of them, Graphical and CE function,
    It is also taking a long time to execute
    Graphical view giving me the following error after 2 hr and 36 minutes
    Could not execute 'SELECT ORDER_ID,ITEM_ID,RANK from "_SYS_BIC"."EMMAPERF/ORDER_FACT_HANA_CV" group by ...' in 2:36:23.411 hours .
    SAP DBTech JDBC: [2048]: column store error: search table error:  [2620] executor: plan operation failed
    CE function - I aborted after 40 mins
    Do you know the syntax to declare local variable to use in CE function?

  • What's in the apple TV update that came out tonight?  It's taking a long time to load.

    What's in the apple TV update that came out tonight?  It's taking a long time to load.

    Apple TV Software Update 5.2
    Feature
    Summary
    iTunes in the Cloud
    Browse and play your purchased iTunes music directly from iCloud. This feature may not be available in all countries.
    Bluetooth keyboard
    Use your Apple Wireless Keyboard to control your Apple TV. See this articlefor more information.
    AirPlay audio for videos
    Send stereo audio from movies, TV shows, and other videos on Apple TV to AirPlay-enabled speakers and devices (including AirPort Express and other Apple TVs).
    Stability and performance
    Includes general performance and stability improvements.
    If it's taking awhile to load it could be due to slow network speed or interference. It's around 600MB. If on ethernet, some have reported issues, try wifi.

  • Time Machine Taking a Long Time to Index / Back Up

    Hi everyone.
    I noticed this on the latest backup to my Time Capsule device.  I'm backing up over a WiFi connection to a time capsule device.  It is taking a long time to index the backup.  Here's the code from the latest backup.
    10/17/12 9:43:03.799 PM com.apple.backupd: Starting standard backup
    10/17/12 9:43:04.091 PM com.apple.backupd: Attempting to mount network destination URL: afp://Michael%20Payne@Extreme%20Pleasantville._afpovertcp._tcp.local/Time%20Mac hine%20Backups
    10/17/12 9:43:12.657 PM com.apple.backupd: Mounted network destination at mountpoint: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups using URL: afp://Michael%20Payne@Extreme%20Pleasantville._afpovertcp._tcp.local/Time%20Mac hine%20Backups
    10/17/12 9:43:34.015 PM com.apple.backupd: QUICKCHECK ONLY; FILESYSTEM CLEAN
    10/17/12 9:43:37.440 PM com.apple.backupd: Disk image /Volumes/Time Machine Backups/Michael’s MacBook Pro.sparsebundle mounted at: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups 1
    10/17/12 9:43:37.459 PM com.apple.backupd: Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups 1/Backups.backupdb
    10/17/12 9:45:23.296 PM com.apple.backupd: 500.1 MB required (including padding), 3.27 GB available
    10/17/12 9:46:48.844 PM com.apple.backupd: Copied 1436 files (3.4 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    10/17/12 9:46:51.897 PM com.apple.backupd: 448.1 MB required (including padding), 3.27 GB available
    10/17/12 9:46:51.898 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:47:53.681 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:48:55.642 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:49:56.511 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:50:56.564 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:51:57.643 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:52:57.903 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:53:59.341 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:55:01.281 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:56:03.171 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:57:03.966 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    10/17/12 9:58:33.083 PM com.apple.backupd: Copied 824 files (1.2 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    10/17/12 9:58:40.359 PM com.apple.backupd: Starting post-backup thinning
    10/17/12 9:59:51.851 PM com.apple.backupd: Deleted /Volumes/Time Machine Backups 1/Backups.backupdb/Michael’s MacBook Pro/2012-10-16-213620 (5.6 MB)
    10/17/12 10:00:17.440 PM com.apple.backupd: Deleted /Volumes/Time Machine Backups 1/Backups.backupdb/Michael’s MacBook Pro/2012-10-16-113505 (1.6 MB)
    10/17/12 10:00:30.046 PM com.apple.backupd: Deleted /Volumes/Time Machine Backups 1/Backups.backupdb/Michael’s MacBook Pro/2012-10-16-103509 (1.6 MB)
    10/17/12 10:00:43.781 PM com.apple.backupd: Deleted /Volumes/Time Machine Backups 1/Backups.backupdb/Michael’s MacBook Pro/2012-10-16-093513 (1.3 MB)
    10/17/12 10:00:43.781 PM com.apple.backupd: Post-back up thinning complete: 4 expired backups removed
    10/17/12 10:00:45.207 PM com.apple.backupd: Backup completed successfully.
    10/17/12 10:00:56.988 PM com.apple.backupd: Ejected Time Machine disk image.
    10/17/12 10:00:57.550 PM com.apple.backupd: Ejected Time Machine network volume.
    I am just curious as to why this is, and what I might do to fix it.  I did see one suggestion in another website suggesting diabling spolight indexing of the backup image with sudo mdutil -i off /Volumes/Time Machine Backups, but don't know where to type that in.  It then states to reenable it, but don't know where to type that in, either.  Any advice would be helpful.  I did run a verification not too long ago, and here's that code.
    10/14/12 3:44:14.289 PM com.apple.backupd: Backup verification requested by user.
    10/14/12 3:44:41.503 PM com.apple.backupd: Running backup verification
    10/14/12 4:04:31.602 PM com.apple.backupd: Backup verification passed!
    If any of you have or had a similar problem, I'd appreciate your help.  For the time being, I may just disable time machine during the evening, and only have it run during the day when I'm at work.

    Is your sig still current (10.7.3)? Or did you update to 10.7.5? Because 10.7.5 had a Spotlight/Time Machine bug that slowed down a lot of backups. If that's what it is, there's now a 10.7.5 Supplemental Update that fixes the slow Time Machine problem.
    If it isn't 10.7.5, I don't know what the problem might be.

  • My email all of sudden is taking a long time to open

    Since last week my msn.com email is taking a long time to open I haven't changed a thing and I have had this email since 1998

    How large is your hard drive and how much hard drive space do you have left?
    Which Macbook Pro do you have?
    Which os & version are you using?

  • My mac pro is taking a long time to open files

    When I rey and open applications like Finder, it is taking a long time to open or it hangs how can I fix this
    I have OS10.7.2 and 300GB left out of 500GB.
    Mac book peo 17
    Message was edited by: waldoamt

    How large is your hard drive and how much hard drive space do you have left?
    Which Macbook Pro do you have?
    Which os & version are you using?

Maybe you are looking for

  • 1. could I connect an external USB3 drive to my macbook pro (15" MID 2010)?

    Trying to connect I can't see it. 2. Question: Is it mirroring possible with apple TV on MacBook pro 15" MID 2010?. Playing a movie with VLC can I send it to TV? Could you please give me an advise?

  • After Update to Mac OS 10.10.2 grey Display and Stop symbol

    After Update to 10.10.2 grey Display and Stop symbol while booting. Happily I had a TimeMaschine BackUp. But what can I do to solve the Problem and update to the newest version 10.10.2 ? My Hardware: Macbook Pro 13" Mid 2010 Samsung SSD 840 Evo 250GB

  • Where can i get my i pod fixed

    Hey were can I get my I Pod fixed

  • Lightroom 5 suddenly not recognizing CR2 files...

    I plugged in my card reader today to import some raw files, and lightroom said they could not be imported because the files weren't recognized. I opened them just fine in photoshop so I know the files are okay. I also tried copying to my desktop and

  • Shared members issue

    Hi to all, I've a Problem with the shared members in a excel spreadsheet. I need to see all members in a specific dimension (shared members included). using members selection dialog box, i'm using the view method "by generation name" and the output o