Reports take more time
hello experts,
i am using report builder(10g).i am working on a report.the report is ok but it takes more time to run.
.i already created indexing in columns but yet not its sufficient to improve the performance
so pls help me to improve the performance of my report.
Thanks And Regards]
Ravi
964900 wrote:
hello experts,
i am using report builder(10g).i am working on a report.the report is ok but it takes more time to run.
.i already created indexing in columns but yet not its sufficient to improve the performance
so pls help me to improve the performance of my report.
Hi Ravi
NO one can help you without giving idea.
first idea you already done.
secondly test your query with explain plan. How to run ?
explain plan for <your query>;
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);more read SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
Lastly you can not get very good help from this forum. Better close it and post @ PL/SQL
Hope this helps
Hamid
Mark correct/helpful to help others to get right answer(s).*
Similar Messages
-
Why HTML report takes more time than the PDF one?
Hi,
I have created report in Reports 6i. When I run the report on the web with FORMAT = PDF it runs very fast and shows all the pages in 2 minutes. But when I run with
FORMAT = HTML it shows the first page in 2 minutes, after that it takes lot of time to show the remaining pages. If the total pages are more than 40, the browser just freezes
Can somebody give me the reason?
Is there any way to rectify this?
Thanks alot.
Ram.Hi Senthil,
Iam running with the below parameters.
Format : HTML
Destination : Screen.
My default browser is IE. When I try to run using Netscape it showed only 1 page out of 34 pages.
When I run Format as PDF it is faster but font size is small when it opens up. Offcourse user can zoom it.
If I increase the report width from 11 to 14 the font size becomes very small when it open up in browser.
Is there any way that I can set up zoom when I run as PDF?
Thanks for your help.
Ram. -
In my TDS Certificate Report takes more time in fetching the data from bseg
only i am checking mblnr and company code.
I think you can do this, but not the way you are doing it now. You have to use most of the key when going agains BSEG. I'll look around a bit and get back to you.
Yes - you can get the purchase order and sales order line items for the material. Then go to the history tables to get the material document numbers. Finally use AWTYPE and AWKEY to get the document numbers from BKPF.
Rob
Message was edited by:
Rob Burbank -
Take more time while running report on live
report takes more time to open on live. while running manually by connecting to live it run (means first pages generate with in 4 sec) but when i click to next page it tooks 3-4 sec.
thers's only two formula column.
please advice me to make it run smooth. waiting for ur response.
RegardsMay i know which version u are using
and hw many records does it has to fetch.? -
SSRS report taking more time but fast in SSMS
SSRS report taking more time but fast in SSMS,We are binding a string which more than 43000 length each and total number records is 4000.
Plese do the needful.It is not possible to create index because it crosses 900 byte.Hi DBA5,
As per my understanding, when previewing the report, there are three options to affect the report performance. They are data retrieval time, processing time, rendering time.
The data retrieval takes time to retrieve the data from the server using a queries or stored procedures, the processing time takes time to process the data within the report using the operations in the layout of the report and the rendering time takes time
to display the information of the report and how it is displayed like excel, pdf, html formats. It is the reason why report take more time than in SSMS.
To improve the performance, we need to improve the three aspects. For the details, please see the great blog:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mariae/archive/2009/04/16/quick-tips-for-monitoring-and-improving-performance-in-reporting-services.aspx
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Heidi Duan
Heidi Duan
TechNet Community Support -
'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document
Hi Experts,
I m using 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' in my custom report, it takes more time for creating Material documents.
Please let me know if there is any option to overcome this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
LeoHi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian -
Automatic DOP take more time to execute query
We upgraded database to oracle 11gR2. While testing Automatic DOP feature with our existing query it takes more time than with parallel.
Note: No constrains or Index created on table to gain performance while loading data (5000records / sec)
Os : Sun Solaris 64bit
CPU = 8
RAM = 7456M
Default parameter settings:
parallel_degree_policy string MANUAL
parallel_degree_limit string CPU
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
arallel_degree_limit string CPU
cpu_count integer 8
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
resource_manager_cpu_allocation integer 8
Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT
/*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL */
Query gets executed in 22minutes : execution plan
COUNT(*)
9600
Elapsed: 00:22:10.71
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3765539975
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE OR| | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|Automatic DOP Query: parameters set
alter session set PARALLEL_DEGREE_POLICY = limited;
alter session force parallel query ;Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL*/
This query takes more than 2hrs to execute
COUNT(*)
9600
Elapsed: 02:07:48.81
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 127536830
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart|Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 150K (1)| 00:30:01 | | | | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10000 | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 4 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | PCWP | |
| 5 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWC | |
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWP | |
Note
- automatic DOP: Computed Degree of Parallelism is 16 because of degree limitcan some one help us to find out where we did wrong or any pointer will really helpful to resolve an issue.
Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:05 AMGenerated AWR report for ADOP
Foreground Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
direct path read 522,173 0 125,051 239 628.4 99.3
db file sequential read 663 0 156 235 0.8 .1
log file sync 165 0 117 712 0.2 .1
Disk file operations I/O 267 0 63 236 0.3 .1
db file scattered read 251 0 36 145 0.3 .0
control file sequential re 217 0 32 149 0.3 .0
library cache load lock 2 0 10 4797 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 0 9 3149 0.0 .0
read by other session 5 0 2 429 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 613,170 0 2 0 737.9 .0
sort segment request 1 100 1 1007 0.0 .0
os thread startup 16 0 1 43 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 1 527 0.0 .0
latch free 51 0 0 2 0.1 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 59 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 19 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 36 0 0 1 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 0 0 1 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 45 0 0 1 0.1 .0
CSS initialization 2 0 0 6 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 0 0 11 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 9 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 2 0 0 1 0.0 .0
direct path write 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
jobq slave wait 17,554 100 8,942 509 21.1
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4,060 95 7,870 1938 4.9
SQL*Net message from clien 96 0 5,756 59962 0.1
PX Deq: Execution Msg 618 56 712 1152 0.7
KSV master wait 11 0 0 2 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 0 0 1 0.0
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
control file sequential re 6,249 0 2,375 380 7.5 55.6
control file parallel writ 2,003 0 744 371 2.4 17.4
db file parallel write 1,604 0 503 313 1.9 11.8
log file parallel write 861 0 320 371 1.0 7.5
db file sequential read 363 0 151 415 0.4 3.5
db file scattered read 152 0 64 421 0.2 1.5
Disk file operations I/O 276 0 21 77 0.3 .5
os thread startup 316 0 15 48 0.4 .4
ADR block file read 24 0 11 450 0.0 .3
rdbms ipc reply 17 12 7 403 0.0 .2
Data file init write 6 0 6 1016 0.0 .1
direct path write 21 0 6 287 0.0 .1
log file sync 7 0 6 796 0.0 .1
ADR block file write 10 0 4 414 0.0 .1
enq: JS - queue lock 1 0 3 2535 0.0 .1
ASM file metadata operatio 1,801 0 2 1 2.2 .0
db file parallel read 30 0 1 40 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 955 0 1 1 1.1 .0
db file single write 1 0 0 415 0.0 .0
reliable message 10 0 0 23 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 75 0 0 2 0.1 .0
latch: call allocation 26 0 0 2 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 7 0 0 6 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 352 100 0 0 0.4 .0
undo segment extension 2 100 0 5 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 9 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 42 0 0 0 0.1 .0
latch: parallel query allo 4 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 37,948 97 104,599 2756 45.7
DIAG idle wait 16,762 100 16,927 1010 20.2
ASM background timer 1,724 0 8,467 4912 2.1
shared server idle wait 282 100 8,465 30019 0.3
pmon timer 3,123 90 8,465 2711 3.8
wait for unread message on 8,381 100 8,465 1010 10.1
dispatcher timer 141 100 8,463 60019 0.2
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50 8,462 14010 0.7
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 304 0 8,462 27836 0.4
smon timer 35 71 8,382 239496 0.0
Space Manager: slave idle 1,621 99 8,083 4986 2.0
PX Idle Wait 2,392 99 4,739 1981 2.9
class slave wait 46 0 623 13546 0.1
KSV master wait 2 0 0 27 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 7 0 0 1 0.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 24 100.0
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1812 99.0 .3 .4 .2 .1
CSS initialization 9 100.0
CSS operation: action 11 90.9 9.1
CSS operation: query 54 100.0
Data file init write 6 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0
Disk file operations I/O 533 88.7 2.6 .6 1.5 .2 6.4
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 4 100.0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 2 100.0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 42.9 28.6 28.6
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 6 100.0
SQL*Net message to client 102 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 4 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 527 100.0
buffer busy waits 4 75.0 25.0
control file parallel writ 2003 9.3 .5 .0 .1 90.0
control file sequential re 6466 10.6 .0 .0 .0 .1 .2 89.0
cursor: pin S 9 100.0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
db file parallel read 30 6.7 30.0 63.3
db file parallel write 1604 7.4 .1 .6 16.5 75.5
db file scattered read 403 3.7 .2 2.5 13.6 14.9 3.5 61.5
db file sequential read 1017 12.3 .8 2.3 7.3 6.6 2.0 68.8
db file single write 1 100.0
direct path read 522.2 2.2 2.1 .1 .0 1.8 17.9 75.9
direct path write 22 4.5 4.5 90.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: JS - queue lock 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 100.0
enq: PS - contention 1 100.0
kfk: async disk IO 614.1 100.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100.0
latch free 58 46.6 27.6 15.5 10.3
latch: cache buffers chain 19 36.8 10.5 52.6
latch: call allocation 26 76.9 11.5 7.7 3.8
latch: parallel query allo 4 100.0
latch: shared pool 111 44.1 28.8 27.0
library cache load lock 2 100.0
library cache: mutex X 45 84.4 8.9 4.4 2.2
log file parallel write 861 10.0 .1 .1 89.5 .2
log file sync 172 6.4 90.1 3.5
os thread startup 332 100.0
rdbms ipc reply 18 72.2 11.1 16.7
read by other session 5 100.0
reliable message 11 81.8 9.1 9.1
sort segment request 1 100.0
undo segment extension 2 50.0 50.0
ASM background timer 1724 .8 .6 .1 .6 97.9
DIAG idle wait 16.8K 100.0
KSV master wait 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4060 .4 .0 .0 .1 3.4 96.0
PX Deq: Execution Msg 617 34.7 1.5 2.4 1.5 1.5 .2 .8 57.5
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 93.8 6.3
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 71.4 7.1 14.3 7.1
PX Idle Wait 2384 .0 .6 99.3
SQL*Net message from clien 103 82.5 1.0 1.9 1.0 13.6
Space Manager: slave idle 1621 .2 99.8
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50.0 50.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:52 AM -
MRP job takes more time (Duration / Sec)
Hello PP Guru’s,
I have below situation in production environment,
MRP job for plant – A (Takes more time – 14.650)
MRP job for plant – B (Takes less time – 4.512)
When I compare the variant / attributes with plant A and B, I observe only difference in attribute is scheduling (2 - Lead Time Scheduling and Capacity Planning) for plant A.
For plant B scheduling (1- Determination of Basic Dates for Planned) it was updated.
So in my observation this scheduling is playing a major role for MRB job which takes more time in plant – A.
I am in process of changing the variant attribute for plant – A from scheduling 2 to scheduling 1.
I wanted to know from experts whether if I change any impact / problem will happen in future for plant A or not.
Please let me know what all the hidden impacts are there if I change the scheduling in variant attribute.
I look forward to your valuable input to reduce time for my MRP related job.
Regards,
Kumar SHi Kumar,
You have no need to change the inhouse production time you just need to update the Lot size dependent inhouse production time in work scheduling view of material master. That you can do by scheduling the routing/recipe.
Transactions CA97 or CA97N can be used to update the in-house production time with the information from the routing.
If business don't want to have the capacity planning for planned orders then you change the scheduling from 2 to 1 basic date scheduling.
Expert Caetano already answer you query
The reports listed below can be used to compare the MRP past executions regarding the runtime:
RMMDMONI: This report compares the runtime of the MRP execution and also provides the total of planning elements (planned orders, purchase requisitions, etc) changed, created or deleted. It also shows which planning parameters where used and how much time MRP spent on each step (database read, BOM explosion, MRP calculation, scheduling, BAdIs, etc). With this information is possible to observe the relation of runtime and number of elements changed/created/deleted and also to see on which step MRP is taking more time.
RMMDPERF: This report shows the "material hit list", that means, which materials had the highest runtime during the MRP execution and also on which step MRP is taking more time. Knowing which materials have the highest runtime, allow you to isolate the problem and reproduce it on MD03, where it is possible to run an ABAP or SQL trace for a more detailed analysis.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Oracle9i reports take longer time while running in web
Hi,
I have developed few reports in Oracle9i and I am trying to run the reports in web. Running a report through report builder takes lesser time compare to running the same report in web using web.show_document. This also depends on the file size. If my report file size(.jsp file) is less than 100KB then it takes 1 minute to show the parameter form and another 1 minute to show the report output. If my file size is around 190KB then the system takes atleast 15 minutes to show the parameter form. Another 10 to 15 minutes to show the report output. I don't understand why the system takes long time to show the parameter form.
I have a similar problem while opening the file in reports builder also. If my file size is more than 150KB then it takes more than 15 minutes to open the file.
Could anyone please help me on this.
Thanks, RadhaThis problem exists only with .jsp reports. I saved the reports in .rdf format and they run faster on web now. Opening a .jsp report takes longer time(file with 600KB takes atleast 2 hours) but the same report in .rdf format takes few seconds to get opened in reports builder.
-
Hi all
I want to fetch just twenty thousands records from table. My query take more time to fetch twenty thousands records. I post my working query, Could you correct the query for me. thanks in advance.
Query
select
b.Concatenated_account Account,
b.Account_description description,
SUM(case when(Bl.ACTUAL_FLAG='B') then
((NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_CR, 0)) + (NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_CR, 0)))end) "Budget_2011"
from
gl_balances Bl,
gl_code_combinations GCC,
psb_ws_line_balances_i b ,
gl_budget_versions bv,
gl_budgets_v gv
where
b.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and bl.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
bl.budget_version_id =bv.BUDGET_VERSION_ID and gv.budget_version_id= bv.budget_version_id
and gv.latest_opened_year in (select latest_opened_year-3 from gl_budgets_v where latest_opened_year=:BUDGET_YEAR )
group by b.Concatenated_account ,b.Account_descriptionHi,
If this question is related to SQL then please post in SQL forum.
Otherwise provide more information how this sql is being used and do you want to tune the SQL or the way it fetches the information from DB and display in OAF.
Regards,
Sandeep M. -
Takes more time to start & shutdown the database
Hi All,
I have created a database in oracle9i by following manual steps. Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and shutdown also.
but the problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the database and the same during the shutdown. So anyone help me..
the follwing are the pfile specifications:
db_name=practice
instance_name=practice
control_files= 'E:\practice\control\control1.ctl',
'D:\practice\control\control2.ctl'
db_block_size=2048
db_cache_size=20m
shared_pool_size=20m
background_dump_dest='E:\practice\bdump'
user_dump_dest='E:\practice\udump'
Thanks in AdvanceEvery thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and > shutdown also.Please restate the above.
problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the >database and the same during the shutdownHow have you compared? Could it be O/S resources, installation of additional software; you have not mentioned the O/S and complete version of your database.
You can review the following although I am bit unclear;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/instreco.htm#440322
Adith -
PDF Form Takes More Time To Open when using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948
Hi All,
Adobe Reader Version : 8 and above.
designer : 7.1.3129.1.296948
When i am devloping the adobe interactive form Using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948, When I open the same in the adobe reader 8.1.2 and 9.1 its take more time (Nearly 20 mins).
When I am opening the same in the adobe reader 7.1 its opening fine.
How to resolve This problem in adobe reader 8.1.2,9.0 and 9.1 ?
Regards,
Boopathi MHi,
I have seen this exact same problem happening when, I created/developed a adobe form, on a PC which had adobe livecycle designer 7.1, but had adobe reader 7.
Once the form is created on a machine which had reader 7, then it does not matter whether u try to open that pdf in reader 8 or 9, it will take 20-30min to open, it will freeze your pc, etc.
Please ensure that when/where ever the form was first created, that machine had adobe reader 8 or higher installed it.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Hanoz -
PDF Form Takes More Time To Open when using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948 + Reader 8 above
Hi All,
When i am developing the adobe interactive form Using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948,After that I converted to PDF.
When I am opening the PDF form its takes more time(Using reader version 8.1.2).
How to resolve This problem ?
Regards,
Boopathi MHi,
I have seen this exact same problem happening when, I created/developed a adobe form, on a PC which had adobe livecycle designer 7.1, but had adobe reader 7.
Once the form is created on a machine which had reader 7, then it does not matter whether u try to open that pdf in reader 8 or 9, it will take 20-30min to open, it will freeze your pc, etc.
Please ensure that when/where ever the form was first created, that machine had adobe reader 8 or higher installed it.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Hanoz -
'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document for the 1st time
Hi Experts,
I am doing goods movement using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in my custom code.
Then there is some functional configuration such that, material documents and TR and TO are getting created.
Now I need to get TO and TR numbers from LTAK table passing material documnt number and year, which I got from above used BAPI.
The problem I am facing is very strange.
Only for the 1st time, I am not finding TR and TO values in LTAK table. And subsequent runs I get entries in LTAK in there is a wait time of 5 seconds after bapi call.
I have found 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document with similar issue, but no solution or explanation.
Note 838036 says something similar, but it seems obsolete.
Kindly share your expertise and opinions.
Thanks,
AnilHi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian -
Hi All,
I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
Below query takes more time than excepted.
Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
Values in Where clause are as follows
OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224 BT KSBB012157221571)
GJAHR in blank
VERSN in '000'
WRTTP in '04' and '11'
all others are blank
VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT
FROM (V_DB_TABLE)
WHERE LEDNR = '00'
AND OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR
AND GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR
AND VERSN IN GR_VERSN
AND WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP
AND KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR
AND PERIO IN GR_PERIO
AND BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT
AND PAROB IN GR_PAROB
AND (VT_VAR_COND).
Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
Could any one help me on this>1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
> 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
> If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
Select options:
Did you ever try to trace the SE16? The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
are at least 2**n combinations possible!
Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain!
Maybe you are looking for
-
Today I finally decided to use the C4795's wireless function on my home network. Everything connected fine wirelessly, and as I go from computer to computer they could all see it and installed the software for it. The trouble is that after a period
-
Duplicate Ethernet Interface - Connection Issues
Hi, Recently, after rebooting, I had a continuous stream of error messages on my login terminal, and I couldn't connect to the network. [ 669.236979] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 0. 00000080 (eth0) vs. 00015a20 (timer) [ 670.235840] genirq: Flags mi
-
Is it possible to use the keyboard arrow keys to adjust the exact position of a text box in PE11?
Hello all, Could someone please give me a tip on a precise way to move a text box a pixel to the left (or right) - any direction really, using the arrow keys on the keyboard instead of the mouse. This may sound like a daft question but the only way I
-
Interesting speed test. iPhone Edge vs Blackberry 3G video
Check this out on youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJTdFTIF2No theres also a second test to view....
-
My OAM has two LDAP stores(OID). One for user and another for policy and config. The two OIDs are further replicated. We have reinstalled my OID user store. After which I am not able to login into my OAM. I get a invalid credentials. It was fine and