[REQ] resizing multiple images for same height or width

I often insert a lot of images in my indesign documents on a single page. I need to make them of the same height and then resize the image accordingly. I'm using cs6
For example to align all the images horizontally in a neat way, I change the height manually [for e.g. 60mm] in its dimensions box. Is there a way to do it quickly? Eg. I select all the images and put their height 60mm and their height becomes as specified and they get resized accordingly?
Same is the requirement of images for width.

See my reply here: [REQ] fast performance of an exported pdf on slow pc

Similar Messages

  • Unable to select multiple images for upload

    I have Windows 7 Pro and FF 9.0
    I have an online store and am always uploading product photos for items I have listed. I recently switched from XP Pro to Windows 7 Pro. I had no issues with XP. However, now that I have Windows 7 Pro I am unable to select multiple images for upload when using FF. I can only select one image at a time.
    The issue is unique to FF. I have tried in several other browsers, and FF is the only one that I am unable to select multiple images from.
    I had FF 8.0.1 and upgraded to 9.0... hoping that would resolve the issue. It did not. I have restarted my computer several times which has also had no effect.

    Hi,
    Welcome to the    Discussions
    I see it is about 6 hours since you posted, so I guess you will get this when you wake. (I'll be sleeping then)
    This would be better asked in the forum for Using Leopard inside the Leopard Category sating which browser and which site it was.
    (it probably made lots of sense to you when you were typing it but it seems a little short in facts or workable info.)
    8:43 PM Wednesday; March 24, 2010
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
    Message was edited by: Ralph Johns (UK)

  • How to resize multiple images?

    I am newbie to RH and would like to know if there is a method /shortcut by which I can resize multiple images?
    Specifically to my project: I have close to 50 tables containing various images and their descriptions. When I insert these images into RH, the original image size is inserted and these images are of various sizes.
    I know how to resize multiple images in Word but not in RH and hence, reaching to higher powers
    I am using RH 9
    Appreciate all your help!

    Hi There, Well the best option is to resize each image individually but if you feel that you can select all images together and the  resize them all at once I am sure that you would like to give a read to this post from forums which talks about this job
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/466933

  • Reg:Multiple UOMs for same item

    Hi,
    How to define the multiple UOMs for same item.And the item should be converted in one UOM.
    Iam using 9.0 PL.08

    Hi,
    Please check SAP help file:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo900/helpdata/en/89/7ca0a701c64e4a97f4ea5a4edca8b2/content.htm?frameset=/en/44/c4c1cd7ca22e17e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

    How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

    Sounds like there might be blanks in the artist name.
    For instance "Lou Reed" and "Lou Reed_" will not match.
    (Pretend the underscore _ is a blank).
    Select all the Lou Reed songs, Get Info, and type "Lou Reed" in the artist field. That should fix it.

  • Creating multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to store multiple values for same properties

    Hi All:
    I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
    store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
    'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
    values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
    maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
    'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.
    The scenerio is,
    define unified profile types (Business, Vacation) using Personalization
    admin tools, using com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User,
    com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserHome,
    com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserPk,
    com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User for Profile Class, Home, Pk class,
    JNDI name respectively.
    Define Property set 'HotelCommerce' with property
    HotelProp as single, restricted, text (valid values Single, Double)
    Now you can use the attached jsp files to login as a user and try to set the
    property value for HotelProp for each profile. As per my understanding, I
    was expecting that I can set different values for the property 'HotelProp'
    for each profiles. But unexpectedly, all the profiles get the same value.
    Question. is it the correct behavior? if yes, how can I achieve this
    functionality?
    if not, do you see any problem in my scripts?
    your answer asap is appreciated. we need to make decision on using
    Personalization server v/s developing our own Personalization server!!!:)
    thanks,
    -rajesh
    PS: I have tried 'Unified Profile Example' type too, but that did not work.
    [propsettest.jsp]
    [home.jsp]

    I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
    store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
    'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
    values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
    maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
    'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.Hello Rajesh,
    This is not the purpose of the UUP. The UUP is used to allow existing
    database schemas to be aggregated with the existing Weblogic Personalization
    Server database schema to provide a single, customized user profile with which
    to maintain the user properties (
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/users.htm#1068901 )
    If you want to have properties that change value based on some "profile" or
    classification of a user, then you should use classifier rules to change the
    user from "OnVacation" to "AtWork" or "AtHome". You can use these classifier
    rules to select content for the user or conditionally execute logic (
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/rules.htm )
    Ture Hoefner
    BEA Systems, Inc.
    1655 Walnut Street; suite 200
    Boulder, CO 80302
    www.beasys.com

  • Lightbox image 100% browser height or width

    Hello everybody,
    I am new here but I have a question regarding the lightbox. I am searching for a way to show an image in a lightbox that presents the image 100% browser height or width. The lightbox in muse only can show an image in native format. So if the image is too large for the height or width of the browser, the image will be cropped.
    Is there a widget or another way to make the image scale in a lightbox with the browser height and width?
    I hope someone could help me with this.

    You can use any other slide show with full width as because lightbox will show the original image centrally on screen.
    Thanks,
    Sanjit

  • How to use the same (selection) paths in multiple images for batch processing?

    I have a whole bunch of photos I need to batch process, but, when creating an action for this, I stumbled upon the problem that the paths I selected with the pen tool, and saved under the "Paths" tab need to be in every image for to be used in the action. I did try to solve it for some time, but couldn't figure out. Any ideas?
    Many Thanks
    Carlos

    Batch processing usually involves using actions you have recorded.  In Action you can insert Path that can be used during processing documents.  Path have some size so you may want to only process document that have the same size.  Look in the Actions Palette fly-out menu for insert path.  It inserts|records the current document work path into the action being worked on and when the action is played it inserts the path into the document as the current work path..

  • Resize multiple images?

    Hi everyone, I'm new here and to adobes photo programs. 
    I tried Lightroom3 but it's above my price range so I'm considering Elements instead.
    I have several photos  that I need to resize. There's at any time 100+ photos of diferent people/things that I need to
    make smaller to fit onto a A4 with space for text beside each. In LR I did so by importing the photos, selecting "all" then exporting and picking size to say "2cm /1cm" then just pasting from the folder into my document.  (the originals were not affected as far as I can tell)
    I can't find a try-it version for Elements so I'll ask here.
    Can I do this in elements too or do I have to live on water for a month or two and get the LR?

    The export function in lightroom gives you a choice of resizing the
    long edge, short edge, width and height, etc.
    The process multiple files dialog in elements doesn't have those choices,
    so the procedure is a little different. You have to run the process multiple files twice
    once for the landscape photos and once for the portrait photos.
    1. Copy your landscape photos to one folder and your portrait photos to another.
    2. For the portrait photos, in the process multiple files dialog, under image size
       check the constrain proportions box and enter 2cm for the height (long edge)
       (leave the width blank) resolution 300.
    3. For the landscape photos under image size check the constrain proportions box
       and enter 2 cm for the width, leaving the height blank, resolution 300.
    MTSTUNER

  • Resizing an image for the web

    Have been using an old version of Photoshop but am now using Photoshop Elements 8 and I need to 'resize' images so I can save them for website but can't seem to do so.   The old system was so easy - you just clicked 'resize image' and altered the pixel width or height and it just did it!   Can anyone help me please

    It should work the same in photoshop elements 8.
    Make sure in the image size dialog you have Resample Image checked along with Constrain Proportions.
    Photoshop elements 8 also has a File>Save for Web option where you resize the image and see the estimated size at the same time.

  • Bridge CS4 won't output to pdf multiple images with same filename

    Hiya...my googling efforts have thus far failed!
    I've got CS4, and in Bridge, I created a New Smart Collection to find all filenames in a folder containing "." or ".jpg" - which in turn searched through all the subfolders like what you used to be able to do in Photoshop CS3.  Very simple stuff, but all the images are jpg's, but in multiple folders (I don't want to move them out of the folders, as the files came from an external source, and there are heaps of folders, and I don't want to pdf each subfolder seperately as it will take forever).
    The problem is that some of the files have the same filenames (again I'd prefer not to rename, as it happens a lot on this project, and they are all over the place).  So whilst Bridge will show the thumbnail images correctly in the content tabbed screen in my New Smart Collection, but once I've done the Output to PDF thing, for example, instead of showing both different images it has pdf only the first image but repeated it twice.  And this happens multiple times throughout the pdf, the more times the same filename is used, the more times the first image gets repeated.
    I know that it is messy to have multiple similar filenames, but why can't bridge just place the image anyway?  It allocated a space for it on the pdf and does show it in bridge, it just doesn't seem to survive the transfer to pdf well.
    The only other thing that I have done is use the below link (which was posted on another adobe forum thread) to create a custom pdf output template (nothing too fancy, just number of rows / columns, size, font etc).  But I've tried using the standard bridge templates and it does the same thing.
    http://www.proficiografik.com/2009/08/03/save-custom-pdf-output-template-in-adobe-bridge-c s4.html
    Any help would be appreciated...even if to tell me that I am being unreasonable!
    UPDATE 16/11/09
    Just to let you know that I seem to have resolved the bug inadvertently with one of the Adobe updates. The below is the link for the AdobeOutputModule-2.1-mul-AdobeUpdate.zip which was released on 2/19/2009 - which allows for headers & footers to be placed in the Ouput pdf. I finally installed it today, and everything seems to be working fine now (i.e. I can pdf multiple images with the same filenames and the pdf will actually show each different image rather than repeating only 1 of the images).
    Must have been a fix installed in the contact sheet templates that get installed with the update - not sure why the original version was corrupted, but I've left that with the Adobe guys (I submitted a bug report - and they were able to replicate the problem but hadn't fixed it as yet).
    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4228
    Message was edited by: djtun71 (16/11/09)

    When I click import from disc I am asked to choose a disc and then I get this message:
    The following photos will not be imported because they are already present in the catalog. To see these photos in the catalog select 'Show in Library' (the import will be canceled).
    This is followed by a long list of images. If I click 'Show in Library' I can see all the images with the same filename. And then they start to automatically write over those images with images from the disc. However they keep the same metadata and keywords from the previous images. If I click on Import and deselect the "don't reimport suspected duplicates" box, it imports only the images that don't share filenames and none of the images that do.
    Is there a way of setting the "Don't reimport suspected duplicates" box in preferences?

  • Multiple images with same filename

    I have a very large library of images on DVD and I want to make a database of the entire library in Lightroom. I do not rename my images from my camera so it's not uncommon for me to have multiple images on different discs with the same filename. I'm finding when I try to import these images into lightroom they write over the existing images that share the filename. Is there a way to work around this? I assumed the different EXIF data would be enough for the program to realize that it was dealing with two different images, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
    In a possibly related issue, I've found some images that have the wrong filename in lightroom (different from the filename on the original disc). What's up with that?
    I've been working for weeks trying to create this database. It's huge already and I've barely scratched the surface of my entire collection. Currently I'm over 22,000 images and I suspect I'll be over 300,000 when all is said and done. I need to resolve this or all those hours of work will have been for naught. Help!
    Thanks,
    Steven

    When I click import from disc I am asked to choose a disc and then I get this message:
    The following photos will not be imported because they are already present in the catalog. To see these photos in the catalog select 'Show in Library' (the import will be canceled).
    This is followed by a long list of images. If I click 'Show in Library' I can see all the images with the same filename. And then they start to automatically write over those images with images from the disc. However they keep the same metadata and keywords from the previous images. If I click on Import and deselect the "don't reimport suspected duplicates" box, it imports only the images that don't share filenames and none of the images that do.
    Is there a way of setting the "Don't reimport suspected duplicates" box in preferences?

  • InDesign CS3 Scripting XML Import Multiple Images into same Text Frame

    I am having trouble importing multiple images into the same Text Frame using XML import. I imported 5 images into the text frame. However, all 5 images are laying on top of one another. Does anyone know if there is a way to have all images laying out like how Microsoft Word handles inline images, i.e., laying out next image to the right of previsous image in the same line and if there is not enough space left in the line, then wrap to next line. Thanks in advance. I understand I could use JavaScript to do post import processing, e.g, calculate the image size and place each images accordingly. But I am trying to see whether there is a way to do this without scripts.

    You can apply an object style to all anchored images by script. A text frame containing main flow should be selected.
    var doc = app.activeDocument;
    var textFrame =  app.selection[0];
    var rectangles = textFrame.texts[0].rectangles;
    if (rectangles.length > 0) {
         for (var i=0; i < rectangles.length; i++) {
              rectangles[i].appliedObjectStyle = doc.objectStyles.item("Cover");
    However, there is a better approach:
    Step 1
    Create place holders for a single "Book" element and format it as needed -- apply an object style to the cover.
    Step 2
    Import the xml file -- the placeholders are replaced with data from the 1st xml element
    Step 3
    Drag & drop the element containing all "Books" elements into the main flow -- all elements are placed and formatted the same way as in step 1.
    Finally, add a new page, click the overset text icon and autoflow text to add pages so that to fit all the text.
    Hope this helps.
    Kasyan

  • Resizing an image for a Wordpress Theme

    I am creating a website/blog on Pro PhotoBlog and the Masthead of the theme I am using requires my image to be 990 pixels wide. I have entered the dimensions of what I wanted (990x600 pixels) on the Aperture export screen. When I import the image into Pro Photoblog, its saying its 826x600 which is an incorrect size! What's causing my export to change dimensions? The original size of my images are way big so resizing them down to 990x600 should not be an issue unless I am missing something.
    The instructions Pro Photo gives is to use Photoshop to resize the images before uploading them but why do that when I can do it in Aperture.

    Expanding a little on Munas' spot-on answers.  Note that the wording of the control in the Image Export Preset dialog is "Size to➞Fit within (pixels)".  This means that Aperture will not change the aspect ratio of your Image, it will shrink it so that it _fits within_ the dimensions you specify.  When you specify 990 x 600, you are telling Aperture to shrink the Image _proportionately_ (that is, with the same aspect ratio) until it fits within a rectangle that size.  Your Image is, apparently, not rectangular enough to _exactly_ be 990 x 600 when the width is 990 _or less_ AND the height is 600 _or less_.
    As Munas says, you must _start with_ an Image that has an aspect ratio equal to 990/600 in order to end up with an Image that is 990 x 600 when it is resized to fit within 990 x 600.  To get an image that has that aspect ratio, you need to crop an area with that aspect ratio.  I suggest creating a new Version from an Image you want to use, and then cropping with the crop tool set to "Aspect Ratio➞Custom" and "Width➞990" and "Height➞600".

  • Cropping multiple images with same ratio

    I'm photographing an old scrapbook that has over 200 pages. I used the "do not constrain" to crop the first page. Now I want that same aspect ration for the rest of the pages.The pages are going to be printed at13.5 x 9.00 inches so I put this value into the custom crop HUD but the crop ratio it gave was incorrect.
    However, It seems simpler to crop them all at the same ratio and then put the image size in at export, a process I'm familiar with. Help would be much appreciated. Thanks, jp

    The Crop HUD, afaict, allows only integers in the Width and Height fields*.  To convert 13.5 to an integer I needed to multiply by 2.  To keep the aspect ratio the same, any arithmetic operation on one parameter must be applied to the other, so I multiplied 9 by 2.  Thus, 27 x 18. 
    There are many ways to express the same ratio.  I could have corrected for the incorrect parsing of the decimal by multiplying _both_ height and width by 10, and used 135 x 90.  (13.5 x 9), (27 x 18), and (135 x 90) all represent the exact same aspect ratio.  The simple way to express it is 3 x 2.
    *This makes sense mathmatically (to me, a lapsed abstract tinkerer), but assumes, wrongly, that all users are sensible mathmeticians.  The interface should be refined enough to either accept decimal input in those fields or refuse it.  Currently, it accepts decimal input, but misreads it.  You might send Apple a note and ask them to fix this:  "Aperture➞Provide Aperture Feedback".

Maybe you are looking for

  • I cant't find all the motion 2.1 preferences

    Hello, i make the crossgrade of final cut pro 5 to 5.1 on my power mac g5 dual, because i buied the new portable mac intel based. I made the upgrade on my desktop power mac from motion 2.0 to motion 2.1, but i cant see in the preference tab all the o

  • I have my family's iPhones all on my account can I switch them to different accounts?

    Can I switch an iPhone to a different Apple ID without everything getting deleted?

  • Movieclip rollovers not working on different frames

    I'm creating an interactive that consists of 3 maps, each on its own tab. On each map, there are various circles representing data for a particular city.I want the circles to display a pop-up containing text when you roll over each one. Since I don't

  • Column level security

    Hi, While changing PROJECT_INACCESSIBLE_COLUMN_AS_NULL to YES in NQSConfig file to implement the column level security, we get an error saying 'A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46036] Internal Assertion: Condition m_CountFields == static_cast

  • Mac not reading Disc full of .VOB and other DVD files

    Hi all! I wasn't sure where to put this so here I am. I'm currently transferring old VHS cassettes to DVD-R using the Sony RDR VX530. The disc plays in the Sony. I finalize it and take all appropriate steps. When I insert the DVD-R into my MacBook, i