REQUEST: Differentiate between iPhoto and Events

Hey there. Just got iLife 08 and I really like it.
However, I have a major problem with iPhoto '08. I like the Events feature, but I have a ton of random photos that don't necessarily qualify as an event. Random shot here or there.
In all previous iterations of iLife, the Albums and Library were only loosely linked. That is, you could delete a photo from album "Summer 07" and it wouldn't delete it from the Library. The iTunes playlist approach to photo organization, as it were.
Now, I expected/hoped/assumed the same functionality would be extended to Events. It wasn't. I found this out after I'd deleted about a quarter of my photo library. Thankfully the undo button averted disaster.
I don't understand why this works this way. If I have a random snapshot of, say, a sunset, one which doesn't fit into any event either contextually or chronologically, I'd like to be able to delete it from an Event while keeping it in my Library.
I could, of course, just split off all those photos and have one big "Miscellaneous" event. But that seems to run counter to the stated purpose of Events, and it's pretty darn tedious, and I don't understand why I can't just delete a few odd photos from the Events window without erasing them off of my computer.
Am I missing some big trick? Is there any way to change this?
Thanks.

The problem you're having is that you're assuming the new events replace the flexibility of the old albums. That's just not so.
Pre-iPhoto 08, all your photos were permanently stored in the library, and grouped by time of import into "film rolls". Using your example, all your weekend events would be imported into 1 roll. From that roll, you could create as many albums as you liked. Or, you could split that album into multiple rolls, if, say, one memory card was used to shoot a football game, a sunset, and then a concert. It was up to you. Create albums, split the film roll, or both. You were happy then, I assume.
Now with iPhoto 08, essentially NOTHING HAS CHANGED! You still have the flexibility to create your albums for football and concert, and leave all the originals in the library, including the sunset that doesn't go with the game or concert.
Only 2 things have changed: (1) film rolls are now called 'events', and (2) instead of importing your whole memory card into a single roll, iPhoto uses your preferences to automatically separate your photos into separate rolls based on when they were shot. (you could still do this before, just manually)
You basically have two primary means of organizing your photos: manually with albums, or automatically (via date) with events. The benefit of using albums is that it gives you the ultimate control that you want, while leaving the random photos protected in the library. The con is that you have to create and manage albums manually. The benefits of using events are that they're neatly organized by date and you have the flexibility to manually override their creation by splitting them or moving photos to any event you choose. The con of events is that, as sub-folders of the master library, every photo must be in an event, which forces you to create miscellaneous events of 1 or 2 photos--which admittedly clutters up your library--but only if you want that granularity of organization. There's nothing stopping you from having 1 single event called "football game, drunken roommate, and concert", and then 2 albums for the game and concert.
I tend to take photos like you do: many photos of particular events, with random scattered shots of wildlife in my yard, wrecks by the side of the road, cats doing funny things, etc. And I, too, don't like having lots of extra film rolls (still on v6) for those miscellaneous shots that don't qualify in my mind as events worthy of their own category.
So here's what I do... I never use albums because they're just too much work and they don't sort automatically. Since nearly all of my photos fall into the classic definition of an event, I primarily use film rolls (now events) to group my photos. If a roll from a camping trip happens to have 2 photos of a wild turkey in my yard, I usually leave it in the roll, but edit the roll's description to say something like "Camping trip to Catskills (+ wild turkey in yard)". That way I can see that the roll contains miscellaneous shots, and also be able to find them in the future if I search for "turkey".
While importing new rolls/events and organizing them, if I happen to notice that I have quite a few of those miscellaneous shots in close time proximity to one another, then I'll create a "Miscellaneous-August 2007" roll/event, for example, and move them all into one place. Having them together doesn't help the random pictures at all, but it does clean up all the other events from where the random pictures came. I actually find myself doing this more frequently since I started importing the highly random photos from my cell phone. One giant "misc" event would be too crazy, and having lots of scattered 1- or 2-pic events would be too cluttered. But having just 1 misc event per month seems to be a good compromise for me.
Apple is definitely not at fault in designing events. Really, they're nothing new compared to film rolls, except that they can split photos while importing. If you loved the old albums, then stick with them. They're 100% unchanged and still ultimately flexible. Otherwise, know the constraints of events, and make decisions based on what's important to you.

Similar Messages

  • Htmlb:tree differentiate between nodeclick and tree node expander click

    Hi,
    how can i differentiate between nodeclick and tree node expander (to get to its children) click in my event processing in htmlb:tree element.
    <u><b>What i am trying to achieve?</b></u>
    Onload just load root node and its immediate children.
    On node expand get the children of the current node and modify htmlb:tree table2 with additional node inofs.
    on node click  call some client function.
    But my issue is that i am not able to differentiate between node expander click and node click in my event handling. Any help on this is appreciated.
    (I am not using MVC)
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Raja
    Message was edited by: Durairaj Athavan Raja

    After reading your weblog I think I understand better. I did some testing with my example.  I am using the toggle = "true", so that the page returns to the server each time an expander is selected.
    <htmlb:tree id          = "myTree1"
                  height      = "75%"
                  toggle      = "true"
                  title       = "<b><otr>EQI Reporting Tree</otr></b>"
                  width       = "90%"
                  onTreeClick = "myTreeClick"
                  table       = "<%= application->selection_model->itview                             %>" >
      </htmlb:tree>
    However I have not added any coding in my event handler to respond to the expander event.  I only respond to myTreeClick (which loads some data for the given selection).  The BSP tree element itself must be doing the hard work for me. 
      if event_id cs 'tr_myTree1'.
        data: tree_event type ref to cl_htmlb_event_tree.
        tree_event ?= htmlb_event.
        if tree_event->server_event = 'myTreeClick'.
          clear appl->message1.
          appl->selection_model->get_chart_data( appl = appl
                                                 node = tree_event->node ).
        endif.
      endif.
    I pass my entire tree defintion to the element.  It appears that it only sends visible nodes to be rendered. When the expander is selected, I don't have to do anything, the tree re-renders with only the newly visible rows. 
    I tested and turned off the toggle (toggle = "false") and my page took forever to load because it was sending all the nodes to the frontend on the first load.

  • Can someone please tell me a simple but effective method for burning a slideshow to DVD? Now that the connection between iPhoto and iDVD no longer exists, I can't figure out a way to get there with an acceptable quality result.

    Can someone please tell me a simple but effective method for burning a slideshow to DVD? Now that the connection between iPhoto and iDVD no longer exists, I can't figure out a way to get there with an acceptable quality result.

    Export the slideshow out of iPhoto as a QT movie file via the Export button in the lower toolbar.  Select Size = Medium or Large.
    Open iDVD, select a theme and drag the exported QT movie file into the open iDVD window being careful to avoid any drop zones.
    Follow this workflow to help assure the best qualty video DVD:
    Once you have the project as you want it save it as a disk image via the File ➙ Save as Disk Image  menu option. This will separate the encoding process from the burn process. 
    To check the encoding mount the disk image, launch DVD Player and play it.  If it plays OK with DVD Player the encoding is good.
    Then burn to disk with Disk Utility or Toast at the slowest speed available (2x-4x) to assure the best burn quality.  Always use top quality media:  Verbatim, Maxell or Taiyo Yuden DVD-R are the most recommended in these forums.
    If iDVD was not preinstalled on your Mac you'll have to obtain it by purchasing a copy of the iLife 09 disk from a 3rd party retailier like Amazon.com: ilife 09: Software or eBay.com.  Why, because iDVD (and iWeb) was discontinued by Apple over a year ago. 
    Why iLife 09 instead of 11?
    If you have to purchase an iLife disc in order to obtain the iDVD application remember that the iLife 11 disc only provides  themes from iDVD 5-7.  The Software Update no longer installs the earlier themes when starting from the iLIfe 11 disk nor do any of the iDVD 7 updaters available from the Apple Downloads website contain them. 
    Currently the only sure fire way to get all themes is to start with the iLife 09 disc:
    This shows the iDVD contents in the iLife 09 disc via Pacifist:
    You then can upgrade from iDVD 7.0.3 to iDVD 7.1.2 via the updaters at the Apple Downloads webpage.
    OT

  • Differentiate between mapping and optimization.

    Hi
    tell me some thing about this.
    Differentiate between mapping and optimization.
    please
    urgent. imran

    user571615 wrote:
    Hi
    tell me some thing about this.
    Differentiate between mapping and optimization.
    please
    urgent. imranThis is a forum of volunteers. There is no urgent here. For urgent, buy yourself a support contract and open an SR on MetaLink.

  • Servlet filter that can differentiate between Filter and Servlet Writers

    Hey,
    I'm trying to build a Filter and HttpServletResponseWrapper that, when applied to a generic servlet, can differentiate between the output stream from the Servlet and the one from the Filters.
    So, say I have a servlet:
    PrintWriter pw = response.Writer();
    pw.write( "Output from servlet" );
    pw.close();And a filter that is applied to the servlet:
    PrintWriter pw = response.Writer();
    pw.write( "Output from filter" );
    pw.close();I want to be able to do this in my filter that is able to differentiate between the servlet and filter response:
    System.out.println( "Response from servlet: " + responseWrapper.servlet.toString() );
    System.out.println( "Response from filter: " + responseWrapper.filter.toString() );The responseWrapper.servlet and responseWrapper.filter can contain all filter responses from all the servlet(s) and filter(s), respectively.
    Can anyone give me guidance as to how to start with this - really I just need to know if I can differentiate between servlet and filter responses in a generic way (without having to modify the response specially in the filter or servlet files that write output)
    Thanks for your time.

    first thing's first..if the OutputStream if not closed Either a Filter or a ServletChain can write on to the stream.
    There could be cases where the servletoutputstream would be closed at servlet end itself.Therefore,its a valiant effort by acomplishing a responseheader in the response to indicate that.
    Now once the response/outputstream is not closed or flushed out there is not direct way by which you do this unless we indicate using response Headers as flags when we are implementing FilterChaning.
    Hope that might help :)
    REGARDS,
    RaHuL

  • Differentiate between Items and Customer Items

    Differentiate between Items and Customer Items
    pls try to give information about this
    thanx

    Hi Joel,
    Funny you mentioned it, because just today I was thinking about that, and I thought that if it will happen, I will rant you on your forum dereliction of duties. So it seems you’re off the hook now :)
    Anyway, judging from the last 3.0/3.0.1 versions it seems like you are doing your other duties very well so I really don’t mind you keeping the lead.
    Best regards,
    Arie.

  • Color discrepancies between iPhoto and Elements...

    Okay, enough ******** about iPhoto ’08. I actually like it, but I have had no problems, so far. Anyway, there is something a little quirky I have been noticing: I do like the new editor in iPhoto, but I still jump between iPhoto and Elements. I have noticed that my on-screen images are generally a little lighter and with much better skin tones while viewing them in Elements. In iPhoto they are a little darker and skin tones are more red. What am I missing? Is there a setting (Color Settings in PSE, Color Sync) I should be paying attention to? It would seem to me that the image should look identical regardless of which editor I am viewing the image in.
    Thanks for your thoughts…

    Old Toad wrote:
    TheGuyintheProj...:
    Try deleting the iPhoto preference file, com.apple.iPhoto.plist, that resides in your User/Library/Preferences folder. If you're still at 10.4.9 update to 10.4.10 via the COMBO updater. Also make sure you're at the latest Quicktime version.
    Next, log into another account, create a library if there is none, import a couple of photos that are showing bad in your primary account and compare. If those photos appear correct there may be some conflicting preference files in your primary account. Here's how you can weed them out if that's the case:
    Trouble Shooting Preferences
    Go to HD/Users/Your_name/Library. Move the Preferences folder (in its entirety) to the Desktop and make a second copy of it so you have Copy A and B. Now try the the process again and determine if problem is fixed.
    If the problem IS fixed, then go to the new Prefs folder that the OS will have created and open it up.
    Open Copy B on the Desktop and select all of the items inside. Drag them into the open new library folder. When the Copy window comes up check the Apply to All check box and then click on the Don't Replace button as seen here. That will keep the new files created and bring back all of the others.
    If the problem is NOT fixed, trash the new Prefs folder and move the intact Copy A folder back to the Library folder .
    Lastly, rebuild the library as follows: launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys depressed and follow the instructions to rebuild the library. Select the first three options.
    OT
    Old Toad,
    Thank you for the advice. I have done everything you have suggested, except for the updating to 10.4.10. That is not an option. It trashed 5 of my machines and I am just now getting my main machine usable again. Thank God for backups.
    I have taken the worst pictures and viewed them in every photo viewing application that I have including the Finder/Finder Window in column mode, iPhoto 6 and 4, and they are as they should be. This is clearly an iPhoto 7.x issue.
    Thanks again!

  • Software conflict between iPhoto and Sony MP3 player

    I am experiencing a major software conflict between iPhoto and my Sony MP3 player (model: NWZ-E443). In the past, whenever I connect the MP3 to my 2009 MacBook Pro, iPhoto always opened. I would simply close iPhoto and everything would be OK, though. But after upgrading iPhoto a few months ago via an upgrade download I am now unable to view images full-screen. Although thumbnails display OK, when I double-click on any of them to display full-screen, the MP3's 'Do Not Disconnect' image displays full-screen instead, even when the MP3 is not connected.
    I have tried reinstalling iPhoto from the original iLife disc, but this didn't work and my fear is that the Sony software has somehow corrupted every image single file in my library.

    Turns out my Mac put code on the mp3 player because after I reset the mp3 player to its 'factory settings', (erasing everything) it went back to normal and now shows up in the finder window.

  • Difference between action and event

    Hi
    while creating an action, we will find action & event handler.  What is the difference between Action and event.  If anyone provide with examples, it will be helpful for me.
    regards,
    vijaya.

    HI,
    In simple words we can put it as..IF you need any user interaction.. i.e. if your logic is based upon how user interact with your application then use Action..
    e.g. Buttons, dropdown UI elements...etc..
    Means actions are act between user and your application.
    But your application not only communicate with user.But also communicate with server too.
    so to communicate with server you need and Event
    Note. In Web Dynpro, events are called actions if they are sent from the client to the server.

  • What's the connection between iPhoto and Desktop Images?

    I've had a problem for a couple weeks now, where I want to change my desktop wallpaper image and it won't stay set to the new image after I re-boot or re-start.
    Yesterday, I stumbled upon a suggestion to re-load images into iPhoto so they show up under Events.  I set the wallpaper image, rebooted and the old image came back.
    This morning, I went back into iPhoto and selected each of the folders where I could see the new image.  I selected the image, set it as desktop wallpaper and re-started.  It worked.  I changed the image to something else using the System Preferences --> Desktop & Screen Saver option, then re-booted and confirmed the new image I had selected was still set.
    Voila!  The problem was solved.
    But what I don't know, is why iPhoto had anything to do with System Preferences --> Desktop & Screen Saver selections.  I was trying to select the image in the main Pictures folder where I've always kept the images for my desktop but they wouldn't stay.  The only way I was able to fix the problem is to use iPhoto and somehow, whatever it was that got corrupted was now fixed.
    I've spent a good few hours over the course of the last couple weeks trying to fix the issue but I haven't yet found an actual fix until now as I stumbled upon it myself by chance.  Any insights one may be able to share would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to know the difference between User Profile Service and User Information List.
    The user profile store in SharePoint contains information about users. User profiles can be created by importing users from a user account directory, or they can be created manually.
    In most environments Active Directory will be used as the source for creating user profiles. The user profile imports can be scheduled to  run on a regular basis and they can be either  incremental or full.
    However, the information in the user information list is stored in the UserInfo table in the content database of the site.
    A user gets added to the user information list  when he or she has accesses the site for the first time.
    In the user information list a user's email address, login name and name are stored. SharePoint will make sure that user profile property information for those fields for users that are added to the user information list is sent to the user.
    For more reference:
    http://www.sharepointchick.com/archive/2009/06/17/user-profiles-and-the-user-information-list-or-userinfo-table.aspx
    Thanks,
    Jason
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • What is the relationship between iPhoto and my pictures ?

    I hope you don't mind if I pose another question to you: one that's been bothering me for some time. It has to do with iPhoto and storing photos in general. So far I have been placing my photos in >my mac>my pictures and then working through iPhoto to sort them into categories, events, etc. So far, so good, but I don't understand the relationship between the two. For example, I can create new folders in iPhoto, but that doesn't change my original folders in my pictures at all; so where are the iPhoto folders on my mac? And if I delete from >my pictures, then does that also automatically delete them from iPhoto, or visa versa? The set up that I would ideally like to have is that everything I do in iPhoto automatically updates my actual photos in >my mac>my pictures. Is that possible? Or am I going about this the wrong way? Your input would be appreciated. Thanks. Adrian

    You're going about it the wrong way
    iPhoto is a Database. The entire point of it is that you can manage your photos without recourse to your files. This is more powerful and a whole lot more flexible than files in folders.
    iPhoto can run in two modes: Managed and Referenced.
    In Managed (the default mode) your photos are copied into the iPhoto Library when you import them. I would strongly suspect that this is the case in your set-up. This is the best way to run iPhoto.
    It also means that you now have two copies of the photos - on in the iPhoto Library, the other in your Pictures Folder. (And by the way, there's no "my pictures" folder on a Mac. It's just the Pictures Folder. I'm always amused by the "my" prefix on WIndows folders. Who else's files would they be? If they belong to someone else, shouldn't you have a "their" Pictures Folder too? Any enough of a pointless digressions)
    In Referenced mode iPhoto does not copy the files into the LIbrary. It simply references them where you have put them. I'll add a bit to the end of this post explaining some of the gotchas with this mode.
    How can you tell if you're running a Managed or a Referenced Library? Go to iPhoto -> Preferences -> Advanced. Is the box at Copy Items to the iPhoto Library checked?
    As iPhoto is a database there is
    a: No relationship between the photos in your Pictures Folder and iPhoto if you have a Managed Library
    b: Minimal relationship if you have a Referenced Library.
    For example, I can create new folders in iPhoto, but that doesn't change my original folders in my pictures at all; so where are the iPhoto folders on my mac?
    They are entries in the iPhoto database.
    And if I delete from >my pictures, then does that also automatically delete them from iPhoto,
    Again: depending on whether your Managed or Referenced:
    a: Managed: No it does not, makes no dfference to iPhoto at all.
    b: Referenced: You've just corrupted your iPhoto Library.
    When you use iPhoto it's your "Go To" app for photographs. The point is that you don't manipulate the files in the Finder any more. You use iPhoto to import, iPhoto to organise, share and so on, you use iPhoto to Delete too.
    or visa versa?
    Managed: Deleting from iPhoto also removes the files from the HD.
    Referenced: Deleting Files from iPhoto only removes those elements within the iPhoto Library. You then need to trash the original file yourself. Why? When you elected to Reference the files you said to iPhoto "I want to manage the files myself" So manage them.
    The set up that I would ideally like to have is that everything I do in iPhoto automatically updates my actual photos in >my mac>my pictures. Is that possible?
    That's not possible. That's file organising, and as I said, iPhoto is about Photo organising. Albums, Folders, Slideshows etc in iPhoto are all virtual, that is they are entries in the database. The advantage of this is that a photo can be in 50 albums and use no extra disk space at all. Also, iPhoto has no ability to manage files outside the iPhoto Library Folder.
    So how do you actually get to your files if you want to email, upload etc?
    There are many, many ways to access your files in iPhoto:
    *For Users of 10.5 and later*
    You can use any Open / Attach / Browse dialogue. On the left there's a Media heading, your pics can be accessed there. Command-Click for selecting multiple pics.
    Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
    (Note the above illustration is not a Finder Window. It's the dialogue you get when you go File -> Open)
    You can access the Library from the New Message Window in Mail:
    Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
    *For users of 10.4 and later* ...
    Many internet sites such as Flickr and SmugMug have plug-ins for accessing the iPhoto Library. If the site you want to use doesn’t then some, one or any of these will also work:
    To upload to a site that does not have an iPhoto Export Plug-in the recommended way is to Select the Pic in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export and export the pic to the desktop, then upload from there. After the upload you can trash the pic on the desktop. It's only a copy and your original is safe in iPhoto.
    This is also true for emailing with Web-based services. However, if you're using Gmail you can use iPhoto2GMail
    If you use Apple's Mail, Entourage, AOL or Eudora you can email from within iPhoto.
    If you use a Cocoa-based Browser such as Safari, you can drag the pics from the iPhoto Window to the Attach window in the browser.
    *If you want to access the files with iPhoto not running*:
    For users of 10.6 and later:
    You can download a free Services component from MacOSXAutomation which will give you access to the iPhoto Library from your Services Menu. Using the Services Preference Pane you can even create a keyboard shortcut for it.
    For Users of 10.4 and later:
    Create a Media Browser using Automator (takes about 10 seconds) or use this free utility Karelia iMedia Browser
    Other options include:
    1. *Drag and Drop*: Drag a photo from the iPhoto Window to the desktop, there iPhoto will make a full-sized copy of the pic.
    2. *File -> Export*: Select the files in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export. The dialogue will give you various options, including altering the format, naming the files and changing the size. Again, producing a copy.
    3. *Show File*: Right- (or Control-) Click on a pic and in the resulting dialogue choose 'Show File'. A Finder window will pop open with the file already selected.
    *To work with another editor*
    You can set Photoshop (or any image editor) as an external editor in iPhoto. (Preferences -> General -> Edit Photo: Choose from the Drop Down Menu.) This way, when you double click a pic to edit in iPhoto it will open automatically in Photoshop or your Image Editor, and when you save it it's sent back to iPhoto automatically. This is the only way that edits made in another application will be displayed in iPhoto.
    Note that iPhoto sends a copy+ of the file to Photoshop, so when you save be sure to use the Save command, not Save As... If you use Save As then you're creating a new file and iPhoto has no way of knowing about this new file. iPhoto is preserving your original anyway.
    Finally +On Running a Referenced Library:+
    *How to do it:*
    Simply go to iPhoto Menu -> Preferences -> Advanced and uncheck 'Copy Files to the iPhoto Library on Import'.
    *What Happens:*
    Now iPhoto will not copy the files, but rather simply reference them on your HD. To do this it will create an alias in the Originals Folder that points to your file. It will still create a thumbnail and, if you modify the pics, a Modified version within the iPhoto Library Folder.
    *Some things to consider:*
    1. Importing and deleting pics are more complex procedures. You have to to put the files where they will be stored before importing them. When you delete them you'll need to remove the files from the HD yourself.
    2. You cannot move or rename the files on your system or iPhoto will lose track of them on systems prior to 10.5 and iPhoto 08. Even with the later versions issues can still arise if you move the referenced files to new volumes or between volumes.
    3. Most importantly, migrating to a new disk or computer can be much more complex.
    4. Because iPhoto has no tools for managing Referenced Files, if, for some reason, the path to the photos changes then you could find yourself resolving aliases for +each photo in the Library+ one by one.
    My own opinion:
    I've yet to see a good reason to run iPhoto in referenced mode unless you're using two photo organiser
    I know there's lot there, so by all means post back if you need more
    Regards
    TD

  • Print quality difference between iphoto and aperture...?

    when ordering books, is there a print quality difference between using iPhoto and Aperture? or are they sent to the same lab?
    it's possible i may have some setting wrong, but when i order a book using iphoto, i never really feel the quality is that great. it's good, i just feel it could be a lot better. the print quality sort of reminds me of newsprint, albeit high quality newsprint. similar sized prints made at home on my basic 3-in-1 printer look better.
    thanks...

    Previews are what you view on your display. When you import a photo into Aperture (and I'm pretty sure iPhoto as well), your computer automatically generates a preview for quick viewing. The original images are stored in your library, but it is the preview that you see.
    In Aperture, you are able to set the size and quality of these previews. When sharing photos between Aperture and iPhoto, the process is as follows:
    Let's say that your images are stored in Aperture, but you also want to be able to view them in iPhoto without taking up too much room on your hard drive. Essentially, if you were to import the originals into iPhoto as well, you would be storing two exact, yet separate copies of the same image on your hard drive. As you are aware, with large images (whether JPEG's, and especially RAW) this would put quite a tax on your storage capacity after not too long.
    So, you have your images in one or the other (in this case Aperture), but you want to play around with them in iPhoto. What you can do, is open iPhoto, go to the File menu and then select, Show Aperture Library. This will open a window with all of the contents of your Aperture Library. You can then drag any images you want into iPhoto . The only thing is, you are not dragging the original JPEG's, but rather, the previews of those images. If you have those previews set to a lower quality (again for capacity concerns), you will only have lower quality and lower detailed images in iPhoto. These images might not be ideal, or even suitable for printing high quality prints. The previews that you generate in Aperture though can be adjusted to be extremely high quality with no size limits.
    My thinking was that since you mentioned Aperture, it sounded like you had experience with working with it and with ordering a photo book through Aperture. I guess you were saying that you ordered via iPhoto, weren't happy with the quality and were wondering if Aperture created books were better.
    Anyway, if this is the case, I cannot answer that for you. I have never ordered a book through Aperture. If the quality of your images is good, you should be able to get a decent product no matter where you order it from. There is not doubt that the materials used and the print shop that does the work makes a difference, but if your images are good, you should still get a decent product through iPhoto. Perhaps iPhoto isn't the way to go though if you have had poor experiences with them.
    If you haven't used Aperture yet, I would highly recommend it though aside from the photo book aspect of this thread. It is a stellar product.
    I hope this helps.
    Message was edited by: macorin

  • How to differentiate between Parent and Child in IBASE?

    Hi. I am working on enhancing a BAPI :BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE by calling the following function module IBPP_CREATE_IBASE at its exit.
    The BAPI is being called from an SAP ME system and will be passing MATNR and Serial Number of Parent and Child materials to create the IBASE in ECC system. I am confused as to how to differentiate between whether a object is Parent or a Child when the BAPI: BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE is called.

    if you have NULL valued fields. If
    you do a compare and one or both are NULL, then the result is always NULL,
    never true or false. Even comparing two fields which are both NULL will
    give NULL as result, not true! Or if you have something like "select
    sum(field) from ..." and one or more are NULL, then the result will be
    NULL. Use always "if field is NULL ..." for NULL checking and for safety
    maybe something like "select sum( IsNull(field,0) ) from ...". Check the
    function ISNULL() in the manual.

  • Differentiate between invoice and clearing document

    the table BSID and BSAD contains the details of both invoice and clearing documents.
    How to differentiate betwee invoice and clearing document.
    i thought that all debit documents are invoices and credits are clearing documents.
    But its not working because there are invoices which are credit and clearing documents which are debit.
    Please let me know if there is any indicator or field which

    Hi,
    No difference between invoice and billing document.
    But If we want to inform the payable to the customer we use the terminalogy invoice.
    Example Credit meomo, debit memo. etc ...
    As there is no difference , both have the same document types.
    thanks
    Kuntla

  • Differentiate between report and generated scheduled report - report list

    How do I differentiate between a (.rpt) report and a (scheduled generated report) from this report (.rpt with data) when I list all the reports on the server.
    I need this information because when I view the scheduled report, I do not need to set the parameters via the crystal viewer.
    Thanks in advance.
    JM

    Ted.
    I am not sure why the scheduled report is saying si_instance=false.
    So I scheduled the sample report - Drilldown and named the scheduled instance as "DrilldownInstance",
    it created two info objects. One has SI_INSTANCE = true and the other has SI_INSTANCE = false!!!!!
    select * from CI_INFOOBJECTS
    where
    SI_PROGID = 'CrystalEnterprise.Report'
    and SI_KIND = 'CrystalReport'
    and si_name LIKE '%DrilldownInstance%'
    I presume it should have only created one object, and set si_instance=true
    Thanks,
    JM
    P.S
    Sorry to be a bother! but this is driving me nuts!
    Edited by: jam mend on Jan 20, 2009 9:07 PM

Maybe you are looking for