Request is being created in DMEE in sandbox

Hello,
when i am trying to change in DMEE transaction it is asking me to create a work bench request even if the client settings are
changes without automatic recording and the client role is customizing.
steps in DMEE
Tree type PAYM
Format tree /Z_PT_BANCOMER.
Please could any one help me in this regards
Thanks a lot.
Mallesh.

Hi,
Even though the process of creating the DME is customizing, in the backend it is coding. The changes you make is also client independent. Due to this, the system creates a workbench request.
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit

Similar Messages

Local change requests being created for changing package info

Hi experts,
After a client copy of object into a new server whenever changes are being made to these objects local change requests are being created. i found that the above behaviour is because of the transport layer in the package, which was also copied during client copy, is of the old server. And when that was change to the one available in the new server the change to the package also got created as local change request. Now I wan this package to get transported to quality from development ( where the change was made). Please help.

Hi,
Thank you for your suggestion. I Created a Tp copy and included the local change requests in them and gave target system as quality system. There were 2 requests as local change requests, only one of them took the intended change in the quality but for the other the change made in the development system was not refelecting in the quality system.

Create inquiry without material being created

Dear All,
Issue is regarding creation of inquiry, when material not being created.
Requirement is like at inquiry level customer may / may not know the material available, initially customer may not be aware of the products available but they want to buy that material.
Whereas in SAP, material has to be entered which is created in material master.
Is there any soln for the creation of inquiry / quotation (same case with Quotation too) with out material being created.
Regards,
Vijayasharee

Thank you one-and-all for the quick response.
Further i/p's for my query.
Suppose the customer send the RFQ (request for quotation) with their part no. where in that particular material is not produced.
However, once the RFQ is received company is confident enough to start produce that particular material for the first time.
So how to map this ie., customer part no. is known, where as company doesn't have the material as of now, once the material is produced it will have its own part no.
How to send a quotation with out company's part no. is the issue.
I/p's will be rewarded.
Regrds,
Vijayashree

Spool requests are being sent the the B9 printer queue(RSNAST00).

Hi gurus,
has anyone found a fix for this issue? i'm currently experiencing the same issue and would like to know how i can fix this..
Spool requests are being sent the the B9 printer queue. Most spool requests are for one page, when there are spool requests for multiple pages these spool requests take longer to create, in the meantime, other spool requests that are single pages are going to the printer queue. This creates and "out-of-vendor-order" issue during printing.
The out of vendor order sequencing creates a significant level of work effort for the business users to resort the printed copies in order to prepare the documents for mailing. A change is required to eliminate this manual effort.
Development has indicated an enhancement could be made to the RSNAST00 program where only those print jobs for application "MR" with transmission "1" (for print) would be gathered in groups of "X" number of documents to create one spool, prior to creating the spool, a check would be made to see if the next document was for the same vendor, if so the next document/s would be included in the same spool, when a new vendor was found, a new spool would be created.
To temporarily fix the issue the jobs have been placed on "no execute" and the support team is identifing the chargebacks and RTV created during the week, manually running the RSNAST00 program in groups of 500 - 800 documents, ensuring all doucments for a vendor a sent in the same spool request.

Post Author: Stephen@Azzu
CA Forum: General
Nobody know the answer to this one? Stephen@Azzu:Here's a good one...I'm using Crysal Reports XI (fully service packed) and the reports I have created are being used in a VB.Net application. I have no problems whatsoever in printing the reports, everything is fine. However, when the report is sent to the printer, the printer queue displays 'document' as the, err, document name. I'd like it to say something more relevant, such as the document number the user selected.So I've tried setting the ReportDocument.Name but wait, it's read only!? How about the summary info? No change. Filename? No change either. I've browsed the internet, searched the knowledge base and found nothing. So my question is this...How do I get the printer queue to display an appropriate name for my document?Stephen

Spool requests are being sent the the B9 printer queue.

Hi gurus!
has anyone found a fix for this issue? i'm currently experiencing the same issue and would like to know how i can fix this..
Spool requests are being sent the the B9 printer queue. Most spool requests are for one page, when there are spool requests for multiple pages these spool requests take longer to create, in the meantime, other spool requests that are single pages are going to the printer queue. This creates and "out-of-vendor-order" issue during printing.
The out of vendor order sequencing creates a significant level of work effort for the business users to resort the printed copies in order to prepare the documents for mailing. A change is required to eliminate this manual effort.
Development has indicated an enhancement could be made to the RSNAST00 program where only those print jobs for application "MR" with transmission "1" (for print) would be gathered in groups of "X" number of documents to create one spool, prior to creating the spool, a check would be made to see if the next document was for the same vendor, if so the next document/s would be included in the same spool, when a new vendor was found, a new spool would be created.
To temporarily fix the issue the jobs have been placed on "no execute" and the support team is identifing the chargebacks and RTV created during the week, manually running the RSNAST00 program in groups of 500 - 800 documents, ensuring all doucments for a vendor a sent in the same spool request.

Spool requests are being sent the the B9 printer queue. Most spool requests are for one page, when there are spool requests for multiple pages these spool requests take longer to create, in the meantime, other spool requests that are single pages are going to the printer queue. This creates and "out-of-vendor-order" issue during printing.
The out of vendor order sequencing creates a significant level of work effort for the business users to resort the printed copies in order to prepare the documents for mailing. A change is required to eliminate this manual effort.
Development has indicated an enhancement could be made to the RSNAST00 program where only those print jobs for application "MR" with transmission "1" (for print) would be gathered in groups of "X" number of documents to create one spool, prior to creating the spool, a check would be made to see if the next document was for the same vendor, if so the next document/s would be included in the same spool, when a new vendor was found, a new spool would be created.
To temporarily fix the issue the jobs have been placed on "no execute" and the support team is identifing the chargebacks and RTV created during the week, manually running the RSNAST00 program in groups of 500 - 800 documents, ensuring all doucments for a vendor a sent in the same spool request.

Audit Log Not Being Created

Hi,
I'm using the workflow application "Audit" as an activity in my custom workflow and I'm passing the required arguments.
In the workflow trace file, I can see that the Audit application is run using the passed parameters but no record is being created matching that information in the "log" table.
Any ideas/suggestions?
Thanks
Here is the trace for your information:
Resolved reference requesterWSUser = object
Assigning requesterFullName = Test1 Manager1
Action Set Audit Resources List
Result title set to 'Set Audit Resources List'
Evaluating XPRESS
Resolved reference approved = false
Resolved reference auditApps = [AD_Simulated]
Resolved reference auditApps = [AD_Simulated]
Assigning depApps = [AD_Simulated]
Action Audit
Result title set to 'Audit'
Iterating over depApps = [AD_Simulated]
Iteration 0
app = AD_Simulated
Argument op = audit
Argument type = User
Argument status = success
Argument action = View
Argument reason = User Access Recertification
Argument subject = TestManager1
Resolved reference user.waveset.organization = null
Resolved reference app = AD_Simulated
Resolved reference app = AD_Simulated
Argument resource = AD_Simulated
Resolved reference enduserId = testuser4
Argument accountId = testuser4
Resolved reference enduserView.accounts[Lighthouse].firstname = Test4
Resolved reference enduserView.accounts[Lighthouse].lastname = User4
Resolved reference enduserId = testuser4
Resolved reference requesterFullName = Test1 Manager1
Argument error = The access of the user Test4 User4(testuser4) has been recertified by Test1 Manager1
Calling application 'com.waveset.session.WorkflowServices'
Application requested argument op
Application requested argument logResultErrors
Application requested argument action
Application requested argument status
Application requested argument type
Application requested argument subject
Application requested argument name
Application requested argument resource
Application requested argument accountId
Application requested argument error
Application requested argument parameters
Application requested argument attributes
Application requested argument originalAttributes
Application requested argument overflowAttributes
Application requested argument auditableAttributesList
Application requested argument organizations
Step complete 'Audit'
Step inactive 'Display Message'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with the anokun7. Check to make sure the action your are giving it is a valid one. ( See IDM Workflow Forms and Views pdf and search for Action Names, it will give you a list of all the valid actions) Also you can add your own attributes to the Audit object as well using the attributes variable. ( It expects a map: <map>
<s>Key</s>
<ref>value</ref>
<map>
Value can be a reference, or string, or however complex you want to make it. Just be aware of what view (if any) is available at the time you call the audit. Hope this helps
Message was edited by:
dmac28
Oh yeah..The attributes will appear on the audit log reports, Based on what action and type you audited it will show up on that record. i.e Delete action, on Type User...that audit record will have a changes value which will have whatever attributes you passed to the audit object.

How to deal with .csproj.user being created/modified by Visual Studio before the project is run?

So, what is the problem?
The problem is that Visual Studio considers .csproj.user a dependency of the project being run.
Let us assume the following:
- We have a freshly built solution containing a web application project `X` as the Start Up project.
- There are Silverlight applications served by the X web application.
- There is no `X.csproj.user` file initially.
Now consider the following flow of events:
1. Open the solution in the Visual Studio
2. Build.
3. Run.
4. A dialog is open to ask whether Silverlight debugging is to be enabled. Enable it.
5. Stop the debugging session.
6. Run again.
7. Stop the debugging session.
8. Run again.
Assuming nothing is built at step 2 (because the solution is totally up to date), will there anything be built at steps 3 and 6?
The answer is affirmative and here is why:
- The X.csproj.user file is actually created by Visual Studio when the project is requested to run. What happens next is that the
X.csproj.user file is considered a dependency of the project
X by the Visual Studio. Being created just now the file is newer than the project binaries and so Visual Studio builds the project
X. This explains why the project is built at step 3.
- When we agree to enable Silverlight debugging Visual Studio records this agreement in the
X.csproj.user file. So the file is modified again, after the project has started running. Restarting the debugging session is going to build the project
X yet again, after all X.csproj.user is again newer than the binaries built a second ago. This explains why the project is built at step 6.
Fortunately, nothing is built at step 8.
Call me petty, but I want to avoid the builds at steps 3 and 6. The problem is that I am not allowed to check in the X.csproj.user file, because that is likely to create a mess with people accidentally checking in their private changes.
On the other hand, I am unable to move its default content (along with the agreement to enable Silverlight debugging) into the project file
X.csproj. Well, I can, but it is just being ignored.
So, here is my question - is it possible to separate the content stored in a
.csproj.user into two groups:
- Permanent. These are the things I would love to have in the .csproj file. It will be checked in.
- Temporary/Private. These are the things private to individual developers. Never checked in.
Visual Studio already allows this separation for certain properties - see the
Apply server settings to all users (store in project file) checkbox in the Web properties tab of a Web application project - http://olalalittlen.wordpress.com/2011/07/20/vs-tips-managing-server-settings-in-web-projects-for-multi-developer-scenarios/.
However, it is insufficient.
Any other ideas on how to prevent the aforementioned redundant builds are welcome too.

Hi Mark,
I think your issue is more about project itself. the saved information in the .csproj.user settings is about the project's information.
So I suggest you post your issue to the related project forum.
web forms:http://forums.asp.net/18.aspx/1?Web+Forms
mvc:http://forums.asp.net/1146.aspx/1?MVC
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Transport Request Not getting created automatically

Dear Sir,
We are facing a problem related to , Transport Request not getting created automatically during the SPRO change activities . We have to manually create the Transport Request and then changes need to be included in the request individually on the manual basis .
However earlier , we had no such problem and Transport Request were getting created perfactly .
We request you to kindly help us on this issue pl .
Rgds
Sonia Agarwal

Hi Sonia,
This is purely because of the client settings. Your client settings are in such a way that the cghanges are not getting captured. As mentioned by Naveed, check to see the client settings and change the settings if needed.
FYI: The SandBox clients will have the client settings as in ur system now.
Regards,
Varadharajan M

Did a Clean Install of Lion and I see "librarians" logs being created in Console

I have "librariand" logs like these being created excessively every 2-3 minutes. Does anyone know why ? ?
What is "librarians" for ? Where is the error ?
The logs looks like this:
Process:         librariand [1188]
Path:            /usr/libexec/librariand
Identifier:      librariand
Version:         ??? (???)
Code Type:       X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [154]
Date/Time:       2011-08-15 17:37:16.697 -0400
OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.7 (11A511)
Report Version: 9
Crashed Thread: 0
Exception Type: EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Application Specific Information:
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries
Dyld Error Message:
Library not loaded: /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Ubiquity.framework/Versions/A/Ubiquity
Referenced from: /usr/libexec/librariand
Reason: image not found
Binary Images:
       0x10d60b000 -        0x10d614fff librariand (??? - ???) <0FE2CEEA-611E-3407-AC6E-2ADD0712E195> /usr/libexec/librariand
       0x10d621000 -        0x10d62fff7 com.apple.AOSAccounts (1.0 - 1.0.20) <E9099EA0-613F-36A5-BA18-57A977BEEAEF> /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/AOSAccounts.framework/Versions/A/AOSAccounts
    0x7fff6d20b000 -     0x7fff6d23fac7 dyld (195.5 - ???) <4A6E2B28-C7A2-3528-ADB7-4076B9836041> /usr/lib/dyld
    0x7fff951ad000 -     0x7fff954bffff com.apple.Foundation (6.7 - 833.1) <618D7923-3519-3C53-9CBD-CF3C7130CB32> /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation
    0x7fff98520000 -     0x7fff987f7fff com.apple.security (7.0 - 55010) <2418B583-D3BD-3BC5-8B07-8289C8A5B43B> /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Versions/A/Security
11-08-15 5:40:59.527 PM ReportCrash: Saved crash report for librariand[1254] version ??? (???) to /Users/stamatgeo/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/librariand_2011-08-15-174056_Ge orges-MacBook.crash
11-08-15 5:40:59.840 PM ReportCrash: Removing excessive log: /Users/stamatgeo/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/librariand_2011-08-15-173717_Ge orges-MacBook.crash

Good luck finding anything on this. librariand is new to Lion, and there is no man page for it, nor any general info around the internet. It is soooooo annnoying..
searched the developer site...
No results were found for librariand. Please try a different search.
NOT what I would call "proper" documentation.
i get this kind of crap ALL DAY long..
8/19/11 11:27:24.821 PM librariand: error in handle_item_info_request: NSCocoaErrorDomain/260/Request for item properties on non-existent item.
8/19/11 11:27:24.823 PM librariand: client connection is invalid: Connection invalid
8/19/11 11:27:24.823 PM librariand: no clients - starting idle timer
8/19/11 11:32:27.812 PM librariand: new client - cancelling idle timeout

Accounts being created with administrative group rights

Hello,
The server is a Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise fully patched used for Shared Hosting purposes. It runs Hsphere control panel. I am trying to identify how the following hack is happening.
1) There are users being created with Administrative group rights.   Below is the EventViewer log for the user creation:
User Account Created:
    New Account Name:    username
    New Domain:    PCNAME
    New Account ID:    PCNAME\username
    Caller User Name:    PCNAME$
    Caller Domain:    DOMAINNAME
    Caller Logon ID:   (0x0,0x3E7)
    Privileges       -
Attributes:
    Sam Account Name:    username
    Display Name:   <value not set>
    User Principal Name:   -
    Home Directory:   <value not set>
    Home Drive:   <value not set>
    Script Path:   <value not set>
    Profile Path:   <value not set>
    User Workstations:   <value not set>
    Password Last Set:   <never>
    Account Expires:   <never>
    Primary Group ID:   513
    AllowedToDelegateTo:   -
    Old UAC Value:   0x2DAB2B0
    New UAC Value:   0x2DAB2B0
    User Account Control:   -
    User Parameters:   <value not set>
    Sid History:   -
    Logon Hours:   <value changed, but not displayed>
There exists entries as well where the primary group ID is changed to the Administrative group, but I am omitting such.
2) I tried to identify what Caller Logon ID:   (0x0,0x3E7) means. I found out from here:
http://blog.joeware.net/2013/01/14/2667/ that I can use LogonSessions.exe to identify it.
Output from LogonSessions.exe is pasted below (snippet):
[0] Logon session 00000000:000003e7:
    User name:    DOMAINNAME\PCNAME$
    Auth package: NTLM
    Logon type:   (none)
    Session:      0
    Sid:          S-1-5-18
    Logon time:   9/11/2014 12:41:53 PM
    Logon server:
    DNS Domain:
    UPN:
        4: System
      316: smss.exe
      364: csrss.exe
      392: winlogon.exe
      440: services.exe
      452: lsass.exe
      628: svchost.exe
      756: LMAgent.exe
      840: svchost.exe
     1000: spoolsv.exe
     1252: avagent.exe
     1268: camWMIAgent.exe
     1324: cissesrv.exe
     1380: cpqrcmc.exe
     1404: vcagent.exe
     1440: svchost.exe
     1480: HsQuotas.exe
     1740: inetinfo.exe
     1780: EmailAgent.exe
     1856: snmp.exe
     1884: sysdown.exe
     1920: smhstart.exe
     2192: svchost.exe
     2388: cmd.exe
     2396: hpsmhd.exe
     2444: cqmgserv.exe
     2464: cqmgstor.exe
     2484: HSphere.exe
     2596: wmiprvse.exe
     2676: cmd.exe
     2684: rotatelogs.exe
     2692: cmd.exe
     2700: rotatelogs.exe
     2732: searchindexer.exe
     2812: hpsmhd.exe
     2824: cqmghost.exe
     2852: svchost.exe
     3044: cmd.exe
     3052: rotatelogs.exe
     3080: cmd.exe
     3088: rotatelogs.exe
     5452: svchost.exe
     5596: GravitixService.exe
     7392: csrss.exe
     7232: winlogon.exe
     6888: csrss.exe
     9832: winlogon.exe
    10388: wawrapper.exe
    10352: cpqnimgt.exe
     9496: msiexec.exe
     6068: w3wp.exe
     4748: webalizer.exe
3) I also learned from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/243330/en-us that Sid:          S-1-5-18 means:
SID: S-1-5-18
Name: Local System
Description: A service account that is used by the operating system
That is all great info, but I am not sure I can put together what I have learned to attempt and get closer towards identifying how in the world users are being created and then being assigned administrative group rights.
I am a Linux person mostly, but I am comfortable following a properly explained thread regarding windows 2003 R2 Enterprise issues.
The server is fully patched and it is running Lumension security product. What's more, Norman Malware tracker, tdskiller.exe (Kaspersky) and McAfee rootkitremover.exe have been run without any apparent Malware/Virus infection
Hope someone with advanced admin skills can advise.
Thank you

Hi,
You mentioned that, “I am trying to identify how the following hack is happening”, would you please tell us that why did you think the event represent a hacking behavior?
In a Shared Server Hosting environment, the underlying hosting control panel tool (Hsphere in this case) should be creating only virtual FTP users with a specific group. So no users with Administrative group should be ever created. If this happens,
it constitutes a breach of server security=positive hacking attempt.
>how in the world users are being created and then being assigned administrative group rights.
In addition, would you please be more specific about this question? Did you find the event message on a domain joined machine?
I want to be able to understand in full how/what process is allowing users to be created with Admin rights. In other words, I want to know what IP was used to issue the command, if ASP.net was used (abused in this case), or anything else related to
it so that we can patch this particular hole.
Best Regards,
Amy

Excise Invoice being created before standard Invoice is created

Hi
I create a sales order. With reference to the sales order I create a delivery.
With reference to the delivery, in VF02, if I try to create an Invoice, I get the following message - Excise Invoice created for the Invoice 597500041.
I need the standard invoice to be created first and using the Tcode Ji11n I should create the Excise Invoice.
But instead I get the above message.
What settings should I check and correct.

Dear Vaideeson Marap...
As per my understanding of your question
If excise invoice is being created automatically the movement you create the commercial invoice in (vf01) ,you need to remove the check box in "excise invoice during billing " respective excise group.
Please check and revert
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

While creating a Sales Order , service order is being created

1) VA02 --> given some number for order (71009759 valid sales order for service )
2) trying to create a material ( say SERVICE K in my case and qty 1)
3) now i press save button
4) now i go to IW32 a new service order is being created there.
where should i check for the user exist created which is making the service order to be created automatically
Plz help required....
Regards
venkat sharma
Edited by: venkat sharma gaddala on Mar 26, 2009 8:38 PM

Hi,
Userexit's for IW32
Exit Name           Description
IWO10012            Maintenance order: Priority handling on central header
[Find BADIs for a Transaction   |Re: BADIs for a Transaction]

Library Backups No Longer Being Created in 10.1.2

No matter what I do, Library Backups are no longer being created in 10.1.2. This is happening on all 6 of my production Mac Pros and iMacs. I can change the location of the Library Backup folder, but nothing is ever created in the new location. It's as if FCPX no longer knows how to backup libraries.
Some background...
We are working with Libraries and Media files on our XSAN Volume.
OSX 10.9.3
FCPX 10.1.2
We did not notice the Backups were not being performed until one of our Libraries had an issue and we could not find a single Backup of the library.
What I have tried...
Move Libraries to Local System Volume - Still No Backups.
Change Library Backup Location - Still No Backups.
Toggle Library Backup Location to No Backups and then Back to Backups - Still No Backups.
Ensure Proper Permissions on Library Backup Folder - Still No Backups.
Trash FCPX Preferences - Still No Backups.
ReInstall FCPX - Still No Backups.
I am at a loss at what to do next. I can't even see the backup process happening in console, or any errors that might give me a clue as to why it's not working. Short of trying to reinstall Mac OS on one of my production macs, I see no other alternative. Considering I'm having this issue across our entire production system, I'm wondering if this is a very serious FCPX 10.1.2 bug.
Is anyone else having these issues????

Tom Wolsky wrote:
Definitely not working as advertised. I made a new library. Imported some stuff. Futzed around. No backup. Waited more than an hour. Made a new project and always immediately a backup appeared.
I've had pretty much the same results trying to sort out what is going on since the 10.1.2 update regards Library Backups.
I'm getting no backups with newly created Libraries like others, tried all sorts of juggling acts in the new settings arrangement trying to find a way in.
What I have so far discovered is that Libraries are not created until a Duplicate Project is created of the original Project for the Library, then it appears to do as expected.
Seems like a bug.
Hope other users can confirm this.
Al

Item Texts Is Not Being Created in BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE

Hi.
I am Using Bapi TO Create Invoice, Every thing is created successfully , but item text is not being created. Code is as below.
DATA: s_vbap TYPE vbap,
            t_billing TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapivbrk WITH HEADER LINE,
            t_datain TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapikomfktx WITH HEADER LINE,
            t_return TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapireturn1 WITH HEADER LINE,
            t_success TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapivbrksuccess WITH HEADER LINE.
      SELECT SINGLE * FROM likp
      WHERE vbeln = v_del_doc_no.
      SELECT SINGLE * FROM lips WHERE
      vbeln = v_del_doc_no.
      t_billing-salesorg = likp-vkorg.
      t_billing-ref_doc = likp-vbeln.
      t_billing-ref_item = lips-posnr.
      t_billing-doc_number = v_del_doc_no.
      t_billing-itm_number = lips-posnr.
*      SELECT SINGLE fkarv FROM tvak
*            INTO t_billing-ordbilltyp
*            WHERE auart EQ zsoa_so_header-auart.
      SELECT SINGLE auart FROM vbak
                  INTO t_billing-ordbilltyp
                  WHERE vbeln EQ order_num.
      t_billing-price_date = sy-datum.
      t_billing-ref_doc_ca = likp-vbtyp.
      t_billing-material = lips-matnr.
      t_billing-plant = lips-werks.
      APPEND t_billing.
      BREAK-POINT.
      CLEAR: t_datain.
     t_datain-ref_doc = v_del_doc_no.
      t_datain-ref_item = '000010'.
      t_datain-applobject = 'VBBP'.
      t_datain-text_id    = '0001'.
      t_datain-langu      = sy-langu.
      t_datain-format_col = '*'.
      t_datain-text_line = 'FSG 2829'.
      APPEND t_datain.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE'
        TABLES
          billingdatain = t_billing
          textdatain    = t_datain
          return        = t_return
          success       = t_success.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
        EXPORTING
          wait = 'X'.
      LOOP AT t_return.
        itab_msg-type = t_return-type.
        itab_msg-msg = t_return-message.
        APPEND itab_msg.
        CLEAR itab_msg.
      ENDLOOP.
      READ TABLE t_success INDEX 1.
      p_i_bill_doc = t_success-bill_doc.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
CLEAR: itab_so_items, itab_so_items[] , delivery_no , itab_return[].
So Text FSG 2829 is not being created in Item Text.....

Hi Tahir,
You can check with the below thread
A question of BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE
Regards,
Pawan

Stop Inbound IDOC's from being created

I want to stop inbound IDOC's for a particular partner (type LS) from being created in our R/3 system. Is there a way to do this? I am aware these can be stopped in the middleware, but this is not possible in our case. I am also aware that I can stop these IDOC's from being processed via the partner profile, however, there will be a huge number of useless IDOC's that will be created in our system and I want to avoid that.
Hence, I do not want the inbound IDOC's to be created in the first place even though they are transmitted to SAP. Is this possible?
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Raghu.

Hi Satwik,
Choose Idoc in WE02.
Get port name, Then in WE21 get RFC name.
Go to transaction SMQS - Here we can block this RFC instead of blocking the queue.
Thanks,
Anil

Request is being created in DMEE in sandbox

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for