Requesting more information about field pointer & compact field pointer?

requesting u to give more info regarding field pointer & compact field pointer?

It is called Fieldpoint and compactFieldpoint.
What information do you want? Look on the NI.com website for the systems and modules. Contact your local sales representative.

Similar Messages

For More Information about Self Service tools

Thanks folks for all of your comments, suggestions and recommendations.
I wanted to leave you with our Online Interactive Service Brochure which provides more information about the various ways in which you can interact with Verizon.
The brochure is available at www.verizon.com/service

Verizon has a website for registering for participation in product trials:
https://www36.verizon.com/MM/Protected/TestTrack/SignIn.aspx
Presumably when and if they are ready to invite customers to participate in a test they will add an option there for you to sign up.
FWIW, I am in Keller, TX and I participated in the original TV rollout program and I have not heard or seen anything about an IPv6 trial going on here, meaning I guess that if it is being done here it is probably employees only at this point as spacedebris said.
Justin
Verizon FiOS TV, Internet, and phone
QIP6416-P1, IMG 1.7.1, Build 09.97
Keller, TX 76248

End of memory. Labview + Real time module + Compact Field Point 2120

My name is Michele Ciampichetti, I'm writing from Italy.
Frist of all, excuse for my english.
This is my first experience with Labview, and the application is not so easy. We use Labview 8.2.1
Our system is costituited by two different parts: there is a Compact Field Point 2120 as remote target whit some I/O card, and a PC used to releave data and memorize them (host).
The comunication between the two targets is performed by ethernet lan with Shared Variables not bufferized and not real-time fifo.
The problem is this: the sistem requires a big number of Vis and Variables (about 20 Vis per target and 50 variables localizated in 5 different librarys all in the remote target), and it should store data, acquisited by the FieldPoint, on a database (SQL Server 2005), one time per minute. This storage is made by Labview Database Connectivity Toolkit, and it work correctly. The problem is an excessive consumption of RAM on the PC.
The question is this: The use of many shared variables or vis, bring the memory to always grow? I try to explain myself. When we start our application, after the first minute and registration on the database, the memory grow of approximately 1,3 Megabytes. This is repeated every minute, and after approximately two ours, Labview break down and display "Not enought memory".
We look the on-line help for one solution, and we have found that the variables (local and shared), the concatenate funcion, the array and Vi indicators copy in memory their older value when updated. Is possible that this is the cause of our problem? There is a method to avoid it? How labview uses memory? It is possible set it up for not maintain older value in memory?
We need to run the application up to 4 days for complete its work, is a long test for a climatic room.
We're looking forward to hearing from you.
Best regards
Michele

centerbolt is correct, you can't load a .exe or even run a program on the fieldPoint controller unless you have the Real Time module. However, that does not mean you can't use your FieldPoint bank without the Real Time module.
From LabVIEW for windows you can make calls to the fieldpoint IO using the fieldpoint read/write functions.
This program runs on the PC not the FieldPoint controller. If you loose network connection to the fieldpoint, your program will loose connection to the IO. For many data logging applications this type of arrangement can work just fine. However, if this is the only type of application you are ever going to run, then you may as well not buy the Real Time controller for your fieldpoint but the network controller only.
If your application requires more reliability, and/or greater determinism than can be achieved by running a program on windows, then you should use the LabVIEW Real Time module and develop a program that can run down on the FieldPoint controller independent of windows.
Message Edited by StevenA on 07-22-2008 04:14 PM
SteveA
CLD
FPGA/RT/PDA/TP/DSC
Attachments:
fp pallet.PNG ‏6 KB

What size external Compact Flash does the Compact Field Point 2020 support

I am datalogging with the old Compact Field Point 2020. NI says that the largest Compact Flash card that it supplies and knows the unit supports is 512MB. However I would like to know if it would support larger cards, say up to 4GB. Has anyone tried this?
Pete

I assume that you are using a cFP-2020 and are talking about the removable compact flash available on this device.
National Instruments has only tested this with cards up to 512MB, but it is a standard compact flash interface so it should work with larger. Take a look at the following two documents, which explain this and the type of cards used.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/C4CFE4A4475705F986256CED0009F993?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/3FAFA0DB1B261A7886256D10005B021C?OpenDocument
I hope this helps, if you have any questions let me know
Hannah
NIUK & Ireland

Do compact Field Point devices need special drivers in Lookout?

We recently switched one of our processes from regular to compact Field Point. We use Lookout 6.0.1 and are having trouble accessing signals from the Field Point object created in Lookout. Do we need a compact Field Point driver, or does the regular driver support compact field point objects. Thanks for your help.

I am using Lookout 6.0.1, that we purchased about 2 and a half years ago. I do not beleive we have updated any drivers in that time. We are able to view, edit and controls signals with MAX, and have saved our edited informations to a new .iak file. We are using a cFP-1804 backplane with a cDO-400, a cAIO-600, and cTC-125 modules and cCB-1 and 3 bases. Our problem is that in Lookout we do not see any of the connected channels listed in the newly created Field Point object when trying to edit connections or modify existing objects like gauges and hypertrends. We entered the .iak file and checked the import alias information box when creating the FP object. I have been able to write to the DO module, by entering the address DO001.00 in the edit connetions menu, but hae not had the same luck with the AIO or TC channels.
<:AtomicElement>Thank your for your help.
<:AtomicElement>Matt

Compact Field Point with Touch Panel

Hi.
Have anyone designed a NI Compact Field Point or Compact RIO with a connected Touch Panel Monitor?
I have an instrument with RS232 output (serial data). Since I am using LabVIEW 8,
the executed application should run in Embedded WinXP. But, I need a touch panel for control and monitoring.
I would appreciate any advise please.
Thanks in advance.
Bon

Hey Bon,
What kind of information are you looking for? NI sells a TPC 2006 device which is a touch panel and runs windows CE. This device can be programmed using LabVIEW PDA. This device has a Ethernet port so that you can also communicate to the cRIO or the cFP. Is this what you are looking to do? You can call in on (888) 280-7645 and a sales person would be able to understand your application much better and advise you accordingly.
Regards,
Chetan K
Application Engineering
NI

Gsm modem with compact field point

Hi,
I need to acquire and send data via ftp using a Compact Field Point (there no possibility to use a lan connection or a phone line). I think a possible solution is the use of a GSM modem. Is it possible to connect the CFP to a service provider and access it via ftp (or web server)?
thank you,
paolo.

Paolo Squillari wrote:
Hi,
I need to acquire and send data via ftp using a Compact Field Point (there no possibility to use a lan connection or a phone line). I think a possible solution is the use of a GSM modem. Is it possible to connect the CFP to a service provider and access it via ftp (or web server)?
thank you,
paolo.
Hello Paolo
I have recently been faced with a similar situation. We have a cFP that is in a remote location and being used to log data and control a vacuum system. We also considered the GSM tool box suggested above, but found that it would be too expensive for the actual functionality we required of it.
Insted we have written our own vi's to send GPRS email etc.
If you need help regarding the proceedure etc just ask
Jan

¿Como veo los VI del compact field point?

Hola aqui de nuevo bueno tengo otra duda... como veo los VI que estan alojados en el compact field point al menos los que algun usuario metio en el cFP...

bueno antes que nada gracias por tu paciencia y por responder mis dudas.... ahora me surge una duda:
.... ya pude entrar al ftp ya le puse el pwd y toda la onda ahora mi duda es que no encuentro los vi en el cfp jejeje me podrias indicar en que carpeta esta los programas (vi) que se estan ejecutando en el cfp... apenas ando "migrando" a este ambiente y si me surgen ese tipo de dudas que para muchos son obvias pero creo que para eso estamos aqui jejeje

PCMCIA connectivity to remote controller (compact Field point)

Hi,
I have an acoustic emissions data acquisition board (Micro DiSP from Physical Acoustics), which can be connected to a Laptop using a PCMCIA connection and the acoustic data can be retrieved by the laptop using labview vi's provided by Physical Acoustics.
However, our intention is to use an Compact Field point (cFP2220) to communicate to the Micro DiSP board and retrive the data. Does anyone know how can a PCMCIA interface be connected to cFP 2220? You ideas will be appreciated.
Thank you
Ravi

rpula,
depending on that Physical Acusitcs API you may be able to communicate with the Compact FieldPoint 2220 through the FieldPoint read and write
Sam S
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Error on compact field point cfp-1808

hello,
why compact field point cfp 1808 not comunicate with lookout field point driver?
i set ip adress yak file and lookout crash. i have on the fieldpoint 5.1 firmware.

What do you mean by "crash"? Any alarms or errors? If possible, please provide some screenshots.
Which version of lookout?
Is everything working with 1808 in MAX?
Please delete all 1808 related configuration in MAX, and let it find 1808 again. Find devices, and save the .iak file. Then try Lookout. Tell me if you can reproduce the "crash" each time you do this.
Ryan Shi
National Instruments

Compact field point compatability with Labview7

I want to puchase a Compact Field point but need to confirm that it is compatiable with Lab view 7.0

It depends:
1) Are you using LabVIEW RT? Or will your LabVIEW 7.0 application run on a PC?
If you are planning on using LabVIEW Real-Time 7.0, then you cannot use the cFP-21x0 controllers. cFP-21x0 controllers support LV RT 7.1 and higher. If you are using a [c]FP-20x0 controller, then you are OK because they are compatible with LabVIEW 7.0.
If you intend to run your application on the PC and use a cFP-180x network interface (or if you use a cFP-20x0, cFP-21x0 controller as a network interface), then you can use LabVIEW 7.0.
2) NOTE: You will need to download FieldPoint 5.0 drivers (or older) from ni.com to get
LabVIEW 7.0 support. The latest FieldPoint driver installer
(FieldPoint 5.0.1) that ships with the hardware installs support
for LabVIEW 7.1 and higher.
-Tommy

Can a field validation point to fields of another record type?

Field Validation based on another Record Type Field
I am trying to build validation into a custom object that sums fields under the Account record type.
The names of the fields from OBI (the table location and field name):
"- Account Custom Metrics".S_INT_13+"- Account Custom Metrics".S_INT_14+"- Account Custom Metrics".S_INT_11
My questions: can a field validation point to fields of another record type? My thought was that if OBI can look across record types than all of CRM should be able to, including field validations.
Thank you,
David

Hi !
I'm afraid this is not possible for the moment. You'll have to wait for the Release 16 I think to have such possibilities.
The R16 will allow you to create workflow rules accross different record types (e.g. Create a task on the Account linked to the service request when a new service request is created). I hope there will be the same possibilities with the validation rules...
Hope this will help, feel free to ask more.
Max

Trying to make "REASON" field as Mandatory field in TODO request

Hi,
I have requested for new user creation/modification in IDM. When TODO request is generated, There is a field "REASON" in the request. I am trying to make this field mandatory. There is no Attribute for this field. How can I make this field mandatory. I have attached the screen shot.
Thank you for your help.
Samrat

Ganesh S wrote:
Hi,
Stefi is referring to is a 'Multi-Value' Attribute's 'Ext.Properties'. (for MX_PENDINGVALUE).
In the approval task screenshot (above) pending value isn't listed.
"MX_PENDING_VALUE" is the entry type on which that mask (in the screenshot) is based.
I'm talking about the attributes and extented properties of the entry type the whole time. I can't make it any clearer than pointing out, that the reason field is set by looking at those properties on the entry type "MX_PENDING_VALUE". You won't find it on the UI mask or with a normal attribute.
Regards,
Steffi.

Can we give more than one value for an Authorization field in Auth-Check.

Hi all,
Can we give more than one value for an Authorization field in Auth-Check.
Ex: AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD <Value 1> <Value 2> <Value 3>.
IF SY-SUBRC 0.
MESSAGE E...
ENDIF.
If yes, please help me with exact syntax.
Think it will be like
ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD: <Value 1>, <Value 2>, <Value 3>.

Hi,
yes we can give more than one field.
program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
   ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
   ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
   ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
please reward points, if it is useful.
satish.

How to hide "Any User" participant from "Request more information" notifica

Can anyone help me on oracle workflow notification?
When a notification is send to the adjustor and if adjustor wants to ask for more information to the Validator then he will press “Request more Information” button after clicking on the button adjustor would be able to fill the requested information as well as there are 2 participant 1. Workflow participant and 2. Any user. my requirement is to hide the “Any user” option from the notification where we have "All employees and users" option in the dropdown.
Thanks,
Gaurav

I have done this by page personalization however i have one more query, I am able to hide “Any user” label as well as dropdown and search field however not able to remove radio/option button previous to the “Any user” label from the page.
Could you please help me on this.
Edited by: user11986433 on Nov 26, 2010 4:15 AM

Requesting more informatio​n about field pointer & compact field pointer?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

Requesting more information about field pointer & compact field pointer?