Requirement Assignment Tab on Work Order

Hi Gurus,
I am working on capacity planning.I am creating an order & putting some requirement let say 2HR. with the help of capacity levelling in CM25, I am dispatching the manpower against that req, which is getting updated in PM order on requirement assignment tab.After conpletion of job I am  doing techo. Now my qyery is :
1. During teco, requirement assignment tab is not there in order.
2. If I am cancelling that Teco of order, manpower which is udpated thorugh CM25 in order, is getting clear.
Is this the standard system behaviour, if yes, please guide me what is the reason. In case of no, how to solve this.
Thanx in advance

Hi,
As mentioned, it is expected that requirement assignment data is deleted at time of technical completion. Documented in KBA/Note [1634839|https://bosap-support.wdf.sap.corp/sap/support/notes/1634839].
-Paul

Similar Messages

  • Requirement assignment tab in PM order

    Hi, Gurus
    I just want to know ,when and how i can use requirement assignment tab i PM Order . How it can be used.Is there any config sttings for it.
    When i am cretating WC for activity based costing , Requirement assignemnt tab is not there .

    Hi
    There is no config required for requirement assignment tab
    You can split the work using the employees.. and assign particular work hours to them
    - Pithan

  • FM/BAPI to update requirements assignment on a PM order

    Hello,
    I am working on a project which involves building interfaces between a client's SAP ECC system and a third party scheduling system. The orders are created in SAP, interfaced to the third party, where they assign resources and schedule appointments. Hence we need to build is inbound to SAP, to update the "requirements assignment" tab of PM order operations - transaction IW32.
    I have looked at BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN, but this doesn't provide this specific functionality.
    Does anyone know if there is any other type of function module which enables this to be created/updated?
    The data appears to be stored in table KBED - capacity requirements.
    Many thanks in advance,
    Peter

    Hi Balaji,
    After lots of search and trials, I have gave up on the function group CY_BT*.
    I eventually used direct update on the database tables of the Requirements Assignment.
    Using SQL Trace and Runtime Analysis of the transaction IW31/32, I have been able to imitate the standard SAP process for creation, update and deletion and the effect of every scenario on the database tables:
    KBED     Capacity Requirements Records
    KBEZ      Add. data for table KBED (for indiv. capacities/splits)
    KBKO     Header Record for Capacity Requirements
    Combine that with locking mechanism, you will get your results.
    Just build a Z-'BAPI'. The best cost-benefit balance, as far as I am concerned.
    Good luck,
    Kamal.

  • Reqirement Assignment Tab in Maintenence order

    Dear Experts,
    I'm struggling to bring the "Requirement Assignment Tab"in the maintenance order, altough all the pre-requsits in the work centre like Other formula SAP008/SAP004/SAP00 distribution formula  have been maintained including the HRMS is also maintained in work centre.
    I have checked most of the links/threads on google but no success, could some one please help me out is some other configuration is there.
    Sorry forgot to add I need this for Multi Resource Planning so that I can use it in splits of the assignments.
    Your valuable inputs are welcome.

    Garry,
    You get a warning message if you get them the wrong way around.
    The standard settings for PM/CS are:
    Capacities tab: Other formula: SAP008
    Scheduling tab: Other formula: SAP004
    Costing tab: Formula key for costing: SAP008
    They should work as standard - assuming no one has changed the formula settings in the IMG.
    PeteA

  • Field selection in SPRO of Relationship tab in Work Order

    Hi,
    How to make fields visible/invisible of Relationship tab (if there are any other than the visible ones as default). The tab is seen upon clicking of General button in Operations tab of Work Order iw31.
    Thanks
    Faisal

    Relationships are specific to operations, so of course, you should see by selecting each operation separately.
    There are standard fields available, on those, you can hide or make visible. If you want to add new fields which are not standard, there are some screen exits. You may use those to add the fields.
    But I am not sure you can add fields in Relationship matrix. You can use field key to add required fields against each operation.

  • Assign equipment to work order operations

    What configuration is needed to be able to assign a equipment to work order operation ?
    I already have few equipments assigned to a work order (displayed on the objects tab) but I need to assign some equipments to certain operations.

    Sveinn,
      You would need to be in ECC6.0 to be able to do this. This should be available through SPRO under PM> Maintenace and service processing > Functions and setting for order types > Define notification and order integration.Within this you would need to enable the assignment of operations to object list for specific order types.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • Requirements assignment Tab

    Hi,
    I am looking how to enable the Requirements assignment Tab in the Operation Screen of the Order. I think this should be a configuration settingt but I haven't found where. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    Mithun
    We had the same requirement and couldn't find a suitable function module to update the splits.
    From memory the ABAPers eventually solved the issue by writing the data directly into the tables.
    You could try OSS..
    PeteA

  • Generating the RM requirement based on the work order?

    Does Oracle Disceret MFG has the provision of generating the RM requirement based on the work order?

    Hi,
    If you mean RM requisition as Material indent from Stores , then Yes, Component Pick Slip is the form
    Regards
    S

  • Requirement assignment tab in Maintenance  Work order

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a query ..I want to know the customizing settings for Requiremnt assignment tab in internal operation tab for internal operations in maintenance work order .
    Thanks ,

    Hi sundar ,
    This Path is available in ECC 603 and we are using ECC6 . so not able to get the Path .
    Anyways Thanks for your Help .
    I have one more query  regarding this:
    When I assign one Resource to Reqmnt assignment tab and give any date of  friday then the date is automatically switches to Monday's date . the Work schedule for that person is from Monday to Friday but then also it shifts the date to Monday .
    Can you please suggest on this .
    thanks !!

  • Planning IOndicator in control tab page-Work order

    How does the system assign the indicator "Unplanned, planned and Immediate" to a work order. What are the fields it considers when assigning the Planning indicator in Control tab page of the work order

    It is based on the configuration settings that you have maintained in SPRO:Go to the transaction OIOS or following the path:
    SPRO> Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>maintenance and Service processing>Maintenance and Service Orders->Define Default Values for Planning Indicator for Each Order Type
    These Indicators could be used for Reporting Purposes in IW 38, you could view how many planned orders, unplanned orders and Immediate Orders were there.
    Regards..

  • Error Message while assigning resource to work orders

    Hi All,
    We have the MRS tool integration with service work orders for scheduling. When we assign the resources with 9 hours as duration there is no error. When we allocate more than 9 hours for some resources, not all, we receive the error message as
    " Duration    29,160 S is not a multiple of 15 minutes " .  These duration of secs varies when the duration is varied > 9 hours.
    We have checked the planning board profile configurations but nothing seems to be visible. In customising we have the following settings,
    Time Granularity                 : 15 mins
    Min duraiton of assignments: 15 mins
    Automatic Assignment Splits
    Min duraiton           : 2 hours
    Max overtime hours : 2 hours
    Max Ratio is %       :  75
    Can anyone throw some light on this?
    Regards,
    Selva

    Hi Anil Satya,
    The MRS is integrated with Service Order types and the operations are selected for each order then the assignment of hours takes place in MRS.
    If the assignment is done for 9 hours then there is no such error. These errors are very specific to some personnel numbers ( not for all )  where the duration is more than 9 hours.
    Is there any availability of resources for this operation / job through configuration settings? Why such a question is some resources even when 15 or 20 hours is assigned , no errors exists.
    Hope this explanation provides a better clarity.
    Regards,
    Selva

  • Inspection lot of type 04 in "assignment" tab in Process order

    Hai,
    How do I make the Inspection Lot that was generated based on 04 Inspection Type in the Process Order - "Assignment" tab?
    Thanks in advance,
    Sonali

    Hai,
    Thanks for your reply. I could find the entries for all inspection types under Production order type (for example, PP01) in the config , but could not find entries other than 03 inspection type in PI01 order type (Process Order). Is this standard? How do i get all inspection type entries in Pi01 order type? At least, 04.
    Also, if I have both 03 and 04 active for the material, then which inspection lot the system populates in the "assignment" tab?
    Thanks
    Sonali

  • Issue unit of measure being used in purchasing tab of work order

    Hi, I've got a material with a base unit of measure of 'EA'.  This material has a issue unit of measure 'BOX'.  When I go to add this material as a component to a work order the unit of issue 'BOX' is used as the base unit of measure.  This of course is incorrect.  Can anyone shed any light on this?

    Not sure whether it will help you.
    Have you maintained the relationship in MM in Additional uom tab.
    Also check t code CUNI if any conversion factor you can mention there.
    Regards,
    Divraj

  • MAKE BUSINESS AREA MANDATORY IN ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT TAB IN PURCHASE ORDER.

    What I've done is in dev server is made BUSINESS AREA mandatoy for"A" asset acc assign category, so that while creating a capital purchse order, one should mandatory give input at BUSINESS AREA field in purchase order.
    This all setting i've done in OME9.
    Till now everything is OK in PO creation except the fact that system is not asking for Business area, infact it is picking the same business area which is present in asset code.
    i.e. when i give asset code, it is automatically proposing the business area from asset code and instead i want the system to compulsory ask for business area.
    By this I can be sure that the asset code authenticity...
    Thanks and Regards...
    rahul

    go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Purchase order > defiene screen layout at document level
    and check for the field "Business Area". to do the field as mandatory, the field should be available here.

  • Work Order Requirements Assignment

    Hi PM Gurus,
    I have a situation and am hoping some of you have seen it before.
    I have a created a maintenance work order from a notification. On the work order Operations tab I choose an operation and assign resources on the Requirements Assignment tab (on the bottom left of the screen). Everything is good so far...and the workorder is saved.
    When the workorder is TECO'ed in another step all the requirements assignment for the operation is lost.....am I missing a piece of configuration or is this normal behavior....have any of you seen this happen before and overcome it.
    Please advise.

    Hello  all
    I got this situation that user TECO this work order by mistake, and later he reinstate this, meaning cancel TECO, requirements assignment for the operation is empty , and user would like to expect to see this planned data once again, do you have some solutions?
    BR,
    Michael
    Edited by: Michael Gu on May 24, 2011 7:31 AM

Maybe you are looking for